Low Vision Rehabilitation Research Articles

Outcomes of Multidisciplinary Low-Vision Rehabilitation Using Two Questionnaires and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a low-vision service by using three tools and to identify the specific outcomes obtained from each instrument. Materials and Methods: Patients consecutively visiting the low-vision clinic at Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand, were enrolled. The impact of the prescribed rehabilitation on patient quality of life was measured using three tools: the Low-Vision Quality-Of-Life Questionnaire (LVQOL); the generic EuroQol Five-Dimensional Questionnaire (EQ-5D); and the World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (WHO-ICF). Results: Out of the 104 patients recruited, 76 patients (mean age, 53 ± 16.2 years) completed the questionnaires before and after rehabilitation, which was assessed after 5.8 ± 2.0 months. Post-rehabilitation, the time of follow-up, patients had significant improvements in the mean scores of both the LVQOL scores and mean EQ-5D scores compared to before rehabilitation (P < 0.001), with Cohen’s effect sizes of 0.85 and 0.67, respectively. Subgroup analyses by age, severity, and cause of visual impairment also showed significant improvements in the LVQOL (P < 0.05), but not the EQ-5D score in the blindness severity subgroup. The ICF scores also showed significant improvement in most domains, including seeing functions, mobility across different locations, transportation use, meal preparation, economic self-sufficiency, community life, and recreational activities (P < 0.01). Conclusion: Patients with low vision experienced significant improvements following vision rehabilitation, especially in terms of seeing functions and mobility. Evaluation by different questionnaire types could provide additional information. The WHO-ICF was effective in assessing each domain related to activity performance and participation.

Practice Patterns and Challenges in Managing Inherited Retinal Diseases Across Asia-Pacific: A Survey from the APIED Network

PurposeThe objective of this paper is to shed light on the current landscape of genotyping practices, phenotyping practices and availability of essential vision rehabilitation management for inherited retinal diseases (IRD) in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) Region. MethodsThe 62-item questionnaire was distributed electronically via email. The questions covered five domains: (1) structure of the IRD service and registry/database; (2) genotyping practices; (3) genetic counselling; (4) deep phenotyping practices; (5) low-vision rehabilitation services. ResultsThe survey was completed by 36 of 45 centres in twelve countries and regions in APAC. Among these centres, 42 % reported managing more than 1000 patients. Notably, 39 % of centres lack an IRD database or registry, and 44 % of centres have tested less than one-quarter of their IRD patients. The majority of centres (67 %) do not have genetic counsellors. While there was consistency in the imaging-based investigations, there was marked heterogeneity for functional testing using electrophysiology and formal perimetry. Only 34 % of centres confirmed the availability of access to low-vision assistive devices. ConclusionsThis study reveals several critical gaps in managing IRDs in the APAC region. These include the lack of IRD database/registry in one-third of centres, a substantial proportion of patients remaining genetically undiagnosed, and limited availability of genetic counsellors. The findings also underscore a need to harmonise investigations for evaluating retinal function and identify areas for improvement in the provision of low-vision rehabilitation services.

Theory Is Essential in Promoting the Distinct Value of Occupational Therapy in Rehabilitation of Adults With Low Vision: A Systematic Review.

Evidence for occupational therapy interventions should be grounded in theory to support practitioners' role in the rehabilitation of adults with low vision. To analyze the content of publications on interventions for adults with low vision to determine theories proposed or used to guide interventions and to categorize their level of evidence. CINAHL, Scopus, PubMed, and Embase. A quantitative summative content analysis of articles published from 1984 through 2021. Fourteen articles provided a theoretical rationale for occupational therapy interventions for adults with low vision. Nine provided evidence for interventions supported by theory, and 3 suggested theories to support interventions. Eleven were found in peer-reviewed publications; 10 were in occupational therapy publications. Of the 14, 50% were categorized at the lowest level of evidence. Few high-level studies on occupational therapy interventions for adults with low vision exist that provide a rationale for treatment based on theory. Application of theories provides clinical reasoning that distinguishes occupational therapy interventions from those of other professions serving adults with low vision. If interventions are not grounded in theory, the occupational therapy profession risks losing its distinction from other similar professions in low vision rehabilitation. Plain-Language Summary: This is the first content analysis of theories recommended and used to guide occupational therapy interventions for adults with low vision. This systematic review highlights occupational therapy's distinct value over other professions but also points to a dangerous gap in the literature that threatens practitioners' role in the rehabilitation of adults with low vision.

Services Provided by the Brooks Rehabilitation Center for Low Vision: A Retrospective Chart Review

Abstract Date Presented 03/23/24 This retrospective chart review served to describe the client outreach and functional outcomes of a low vision rehabilitation program at Brooks Rehabilitation in Jacksonville, Florida. Primary Author and Speaker: Sarah E. Blaylock Additional Authors and Speakers: Sarah LaRosa Contributing Authors: Katelyn W. Jordan, Megan Bewernitz

Effectiveness of Mp-3 Microperimetric Biofeedback Fixation Training for Low Vision Rehabilitation in Patients Treated with Corticosteroid IVT in Retinal Vein Occlusions [Letter]

Effectiveness of Mp-3 Microperimetric Biofeedback Fixation Training for Low Vision Rehabilitation in Patients Treated with Corticosteroid IVT in Retinal Vein Occlusions [Letter]

The Role Of Social Workers In Low Vision Rehabilitation Services At The Worth Foundation

Low vision is a form of visual impairment that limits daily activities and cannot be corrected with glasses, contact lenses, medication, or surgery (Jennifer Hissett 2008, 1032-33). Social workers have unique abilities in carrying out their role as professional experts in implementing low vision services at LAYAK Foundation's. One of the social institutions in Jakarta that participates in the implementation of social welfare that raises the issue of low vision is Yayasan Pelayanan Anak dan Keluarga (LAYAK). So the researcher wants to see what role social workers can play in helping low vision disabilities overcome limitations through the LAYAK Foundation's rehabilitation services. Research using qualitative methods using observation techniques, interviews and also using documentation studies, researchers focus the problem on the role of social workers carried out in rehabilitation services at LAYAK Foundation. Based on Walter A Fridlander's theory, the role of social workers is divided into 7 roles, namely as a catalyst, informator, mediator, motivator, counselor, facilitator and educator. In the research findings, it can be concluded that the role of social workers in increasing client independence in rehabilitation services at the LAYAK Foundation has advantages and disadvantages.

Access to low vision rehabilitation services in Australia: practitioner perspective

ABSTRACT Clinical relevance The burden of vision loss is both personal and economic. Having reduced vision can restrict access to education, job opportunities, and other activities, and patients can require substantial government funds for treatment and rehabilitation. An in-depth investigation of barriers and enablers is required to improve access to low vision rehabilitation services. Background Several clinical trials have demonstrated the effectiveness of low vision rehabilitation services, leading to improved clinical and functional abilities. However not all patients make use of these resources. Methods A purposive sample of primary eyecare practitioners (optometrists and orthoptists who held a variety of roles in clinical practice, academia and low vision specific organisations) were invited to participate in focus groups that were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. The resulting data were de-identified, cleaned, independently coded by two researchers and compared. Data were analysed using an interpretative phenomenological approach that included inductive thematic analysis. Results Of the 21 practitioners attending the five focus groups, 67% were female and 33% were male. The participants were optometrists and orthoptists with a wide range (4 to 20+ years) of clinical experience in eyecare service delivery. Four major themes emerged from the analysis: three themes focus on identifying barriers, while one theme highlighted potential enablers. These themes encompassed barriers impacting referral frequency, practitioner knowledge, patient experience, and enablers that suggest improvement options for enhancing low vision services. Conclusion Miscommunication between service providers, miscommunication between patients and clinicians, late referral, cost of services and social stigma were major barriers preventing patients from receiving low vision services. Most practitioners admitted limited knowledge of the scope of services provided by low vision organisations, suggesting there is a need for enablers such as professional development, improved communication between service providers, enhanced referral guidelines and increased public awareness.

Training and learning support for people with vision impairment in the use of smartphones and applications (apps): an exploratory Australasian survey.

Occupational therapists working in low vision rehabilitation make recommendations for assistive technology (AT) and provide training in AT use for people with vision impairment (PVI) to support participation and independence. Smartphones and apps are an important AT for PVI, yet little is known about the training needs of PVI or what training is currently provided. Research exploring PVI's learning and training experiences is required to inform training development. This study aimed to explore the perspectives, needs, and recommendations of PVI from Australia and Singapore on smartphone training methods. An online survey collected data between November 2020 to February 2021. Participants were recruited from Australia and Singapore using purposeful sampling. The survey had three sections: (i) demographics, (ii) use of smartphones and apps, and (iii) training. It consisted of 26 closed and open-ended questions. The quantitative results from the survey were analysed descriptively, and responses to open-ended questions were analysed using content analysis. Sixty-eight PVI responded to the survey, with 34 (50%) participants from each country. There were more Australians (n = 19/34, 55.9%) who had accessed formal training compared to Singaporeans (n = 11/34, 32.3%). Participants valued both formal and informal training, and self-training was the most used method for informal training (Australia: n = 29/34, 85%, Singapore: n = 22/34, 64.7%). Participants stated they preferred individualised formal training that caters to their learning needs and is provided by patient and knowledgeable trainers. They also preferred formal training, which is flexible and convenient to access, including online training with peers. Findings such as providing individualised training, ensuring increased awareness of formal training, and using both formal and informal training methods can be considered by occupational therapists to enhance and develop training for PVI in the use of smartphones and apps. Consumers were involved at the development stage. Three people with vision impairment reviewed and provided feedback on the survey's accessibility and content.

The influence of assistive technologies on experiences of risk among older adults with age-related vision loss (ARVL).

Living with risk is a salient part of everyday living and although risk affects everyone, older adults are often regarded as a high-risk group, particularly older adults who are aging with a disability, such as vision loss. A prominent focus within low vision rehabilitation is the provision, and training, of older adults in the use of low vision assistive devices as a strategy to manage risks in both the home and community environment. This study aimed to unpack the influence of assistive technologies on experiences of risk among eleven older adults (aged 65+) with age-related vision loss. This critical ethnographic study used home tours, the go-along method, and a semi-structured in-depth interview. The study identified five prevailing themes including: 1) Moving away from the individualization of risk; 2) The cost of assistive technologies as a risk contributor; 3) Practicing 'responsible living'; Technology as an adaptive strategy to risk taking; 4) Resisting the label of 'at risk'; The influence of technology on self-identity; and 5) Technology as a substitution versus supplement for social connectedness. The study findings highlight the importance of moving beyond a technico-scientific perspective of risk, in which risk is framed as an objective phenomenon located in older adults' bodies, and instead framing risk within a broader sociocultural perspective which moves our attention to those contextual or environmental factors that shape experiences of risk for older adults with vision loss.

Confidence in low vision rehabilitation and attitudes towards further learning: A survey of UK optometrists.

Optometrists are well positioned to help expand low vision (LV) services and improve their availability and accessibility. Determinants of participation in LV service provision must be well understood to facilitate successful service expansion. This survey aimed to investigate optometrists' professional confidence in the delivery of LV services and attitudes towards further learning. An online survey was emailed to a sample of College of Optometrists members. Respondents rated their confidence in different areas of core optometric practice; confidence in LV was compared with confidence in other areas. Respondents also rated their confidence in undertaking multiple tasks involved in LV service delivery and in routine optometric practice; confidence was compared between optometrists who do and do not work in a LV service. Attitudes towards learning more about assessing and supporting patients with a vision impairment (VI) were recorded. The survey received 451 recorded responses (15.1% response rate). Optometrists who do not work in a LV service reported significantly lower confidence in LV than in other areas of core optometric practice, whereas optometrists who work in a LV service reported significantly higher confidence in LV than in other areas. Additionally, optometrists who do not work in a LV service reported significantly lower confidence in all tasks involved in LV service delivery than optometrists who work in a LV service (p < 0.001 for all tasks). Approximately 80% of respondents were interested in learning more about assessing and supporting patients with a VI. Optometrists who do not work in a LV service have relatively low confidence in LV, which could contribute to low motivation to participate in LV service provision. There is sizeable interest in learning more about assessing and supporting patients with a VI, which could help to increase motivation to participate in LV service provision.

Effectiveness of Mp-3 Microperimetric Biofeedback Fixation Training For Low Vision Rehabilitation in Patients Treated With Corticosteroid Ivt in Retinal Vein Occlusions.

The success of fixation training using microperimetric biofeedback (MP-3 MBFT) in the realm of visual rehabilitation for patients with central vision loss caused by macular pathologies is well established. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of visual rehabilitation with microperimetric biofeedback in consolidating the benefits obtained, with the goal of reducing the need for repeated intravitreal injections (IVT). Specifically, the focus is on the eyes of patients with central vision loss treated with slow-release corticosteroid IVT following retinal venous thrombosis (RVO), aiming to enhance and maintain postoperative efficacy. This retrospective review involved the examination of 44 eyes affected by macular edema due to RVO associated with central vision loss. Patients were divided into two groups, with only one undergoing ten sessions of 10-minute visual rehabilitation with a microperimeter (MP-3 MBFT) after IVT over a period of 20 weeks. All the treated patients demonstrated good tolerance to the procedure, with no reported complications. A comparison of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), retinal sensitivity recorded with a microperimeter, and pre-IVT fixation stability revealed statistically significant improvements at the end of the first month after IVT. However, the treatment group continued to exhibit superior and more enduring results at four months post-IV. The synergistic use of MP-3 MBFT rehabilitation after IVT with slow-release corticosteroids has proven particularly effective in improving BCVA and long-term fixation stability. This led to a significant reduction in the number of required IVTs, with no related adverse events. The authors argue that biofeedback utilization represents a noninvasive therapeutic option devoid of contraindications and easy to implement and that it positively contributes to the overall patient experience regarding quality of life in advanced stages of macular diseases.

Health Management Service Models for the Elderly with Visual Impairment: A Scoping Review.

The incidence of visual impairment(VI) in older people is gradually increasing. This review aimed to summarise the evidence on existing health management models and strategies for older adults with VI to improve health-related and vision-related quality of life (QoL) in older people. Based on the framework of the scoping review methodology of Arksey and O'Malley (2005), a comprehensive literature search of relevant literature published between January 2010 and June 2022 in PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, Wanfang database, Sinomed and the grey literature. Finally, 31 articles were included. The health management model had a multidisciplinary team low vision rehabilitation model, medical consortium two-way management model, low vision community comprehensive rehabilitation model, medical consortium-family contract service model, screening-referral-follow-up model, and three-level low vision care model. The health management strategy covers nine aspects, the combination of multi-element strategies is feasible, and network information technology has also shown positive results. In the future, under the Internet and hierarchical management model, we should provide demand-based personalized support to rationalize and scientifically achieve hierarchical management and improve resource utilization efficiency and eye health outcomes.

Assessment of Level of Awareness and Barriers to Low Vision Rehabilitation Among Optometrists in Pakistan

Introduction: Low vision rehabilitation provides strategies to substitute for visual impairment and the resultant limitations of low vision by enhancing remaining vision and other sensory or motor abilities in individuals. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the level of knowledge of and perceived barriers to providing low vision rehabilitation by optometrists in Pakistan. Methods: In this qualitative, cross-sectional study, a convenient sample of 100 participants was included and a structured, validated, self-administered questionnaire was provided to collect demographic information and to identify the level of knowledge, awareness, and perceived barriers regarding low vision rehabilitation. Data was analyzed using frequency distribution and Pearson's chi-square test to understand the significance of barriers to low vision care provision. Results: A total of 100 participants completed the study questionnaire (59 males, 41 females) with a mean age of 26 (±6.1 SD) years. Eighty-two participants (82%) had an adequate understanding of low vision as per WHO's criteria. However, 47% of participants failed to identify the steps of low vision rehabilitation. Newly graduated practicing optometrists (i.e., those with less than 3 years’ experience) had a significantly better understanding of low vision definition and low vision rehabilitation steps, as compared to more experienced optometrists ( p &lt; .05). Also, those working in private practices were more likely to consider low vision rehabilitation as less profitable ( p = .025, odds ratio = 2.56, CI = 1.1–5.8), compared to those working in hospitals. Discussion: Lack of training and unavailability of low vision devices are major barriers, as perceived by optometrists in Pakistan. Rigorous attempts are needed to educate eye care practitioners specifically optometrists about the availability and usage of low-cost, improved-quality, and up-to-date low vision devices in the country. Implications for practitioners: Continuous professional development through refresher courses is crucial to enhance knowledge of low vision rehabilitation. Educating optometrists to adopt a multidisciplinary and empathetic approach toward patient management may improve patients’ satisfaction and success with rehabilitative services.

Lighting assessment in low-vision rehabilitation: Implementing N-Lited

Lighting assessments have been part of low-vision rehabilitation for decades, but more structured and evidence-based approaches have emerged in recent years. In Denmark, a mixed-method semi-structured protocol for lighting assessment was developed and tested as a pilot study from 2017–2019, and it showed promising results, in that it improved the visually impaired participants’ quality of life. Innovations are often developed in pilot studies, but implementing new approaches across communities of practice poses difficulties due to both individual and organizational norms. N-Lited is an implementation project that entails the dissemination of knowledge and instructions as well as practical trials, and its protocol has been implemented in seven low-vision centers from 2022–2023. Based on participants’ observations, document analysis of the framework, and a midway evaluation that assessed the potential for scalability and diffusion, this paper discusses the learning and change processes in the interpretation and role of the lighting measurements and lighting assessments in this project. Beyond mere instrumental learning, the findings reveal that it is crucial to address how individuals learn how to explore and question the difficulties that reveal mismatches or reconfigurations of values, norms, and assumptions to ensure a successful implementation of the method. The changing role of lighting measurements, from instrumental to more reflective, also illustrates the importance of the practical application and learning-by-doing aspects that are essential for learning how to reflect and “think with the metrics.” Furthermore, metrics and tools are an important part of the community of practice’s shared language. The uncertainty of navigating between the uniformity of the protocol and the flexibility needed for incorporating the method into individual professionals’ practices and the various organizational contexts emphasizes the relevance of the process of learning how to manage methodological innovations in practice.

LOW VISION IN RETINITIS PIGMENTOSA: HOW TO ENHANCE FUNCTIONAL VISION IN PSEUDOPHAKIC PATIENT

Introduction : Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP) could lead to various visual impairments, including decreased visual acuity, poor dark adaptation, decreased contrast sensitivity, poor color vision, visual field constriction, leading to low vision (LV). LV in RP decreases patient’s quality of life (QoL) and Independence. We aim to report a successful case of LV management in a bilateral pseudophakic patient with RP.&#x0D; Case Illustration : A 33-year-old man came with progressively blurred vision in both eyes (BE) that worsen 6 months ago. Ophthalmologic examination revealed his uncorrected visual acuity for right eye (RE) and left Eye (LE) was 6/60 and 4/60. The patient had cataract surgeries and IOLs implantation on BE in 2021. Funduscopic examination revealed the bone spicule appearance, blood vessel attenuation, and waxy disc pallor on BE. Humphrey's examination showed a peripheral visual field defect. Decreased contrast sensitivity and poor color vision were also found.&#x0D; Discussion : The patient was managed by LV aids and rehabilitation. Spectacle clarified distant and near vision with best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) 6/21 and 0.8 M on BE, photochromic lenses aided in adapting to various lighting levels and as a UV protection, and the addition of illumination and color contrast enhancement improved vision in dim light. A convex mirror to be used as a field- enhancement spotting tool. Rehabilitation enhances his head tracking, scanning, and habitual spotting skills. Improvement of QoL has been recorded using LVQoL questionnaires.&#x0D; Conclusion : LV management are vary based on an individual’s level of functional vision and personal preferences. Optimal LV management could enhance patient QoL and Independence.

Primary congenital glaucoma: We are always on the way.

Primary congenital glaucoma (PCG), a developmental glaucoma occurring due to angle anomaly, earns growing concerns among ophthalmologists for its vision-damaging attribute. The incidence of PCG varies among races and geographic regions and is mostly genetically associated. Theories have been posed in attempt to address the etiology of this congenital maldevelopment and in the meanwhile providing evidence for feasibility of PCG surgeries. In regard to the clinical aspects of this entity, both the clinical characteristics and general principals of management are introduced, with angle surgeries highlighted for clarifying details including their success rates, key points for a successful surgical intervention, postoperative management, and follow-up strategies. Taking patients' vision-associated quality of life into consideration, we stressed that further perceptual learning and low vision rehabilitation are momentous. However, much has yet to be elucidated in respect of the truly comprehensive pathogenesis underneath as well as means by which clinical outcomes of PCG can be further improved. We are now looking forward to innovative therapeutic approaches like gene therapy in specific genes in the future, with the hope of improving their life-long visual quality in those young patients.

Low vision Rehabilitation: Barriers and prospects

Low vision Rehabilitation: Barriers and prospects

Interpretation of the Visual Field in Neuro-ophthalmic Disorders.

In this review, we will describe current methods for visual field testing in neuro-ophthalmic clinical practice and research, develop terminology that accurately describes patterns of field deficits, and discuss recent advances such as augmented or virtual reality-based perimetry and the use of artificial intelligence in visual field interpretation. New testing strategies that reduce testing times, improve patient comfort, and increase sensitivity for detecting small central or paracentral scotomas have been developed for static automated perimetry. Various forms of machine learning-based tools such as archetypal analysis are being tested to quantitatively depict and monitor visual field abnormalities in optic neuropathies. Studies show that the combined use of optical coherence tomography and standard automated perimetry to determine the structure-function relationship improves clinical care in neuro-ophthalmic disorders. Visual field assessment must be performed in all patients with neuro-ophthalmic disorders affecting the afferent visual pathway. Quantitative visual field analysis using standard automated perimetry is critical in initial diagnosis, monitoring disease progression, and guidance of therapeutic plans. Visual field defects can adversely impact activities of daily living such as reading, navigation, and driving and thus impact quality of life. Visual field testing can direct appropriate occupational low vision rehabilitation in affected individuals.

Low vision rehabilitation program in patients with myopic macular degeneration: A case series

Aims/Purpose: Patients with pathologic myopia are at risk of developing myopic macular degeneration (MMD) that leads to vision loss and irreversible visual impairment. Working age and elderly populations are affected by loss of productivity and quality of life. Low vision services should offer specialized training programs to help patients to overcome the difficulties in daily living activities. The aim of this study was to describe the results of a low vision rehabilitation program (LVR) in patients with MMD.Methods: Five patients (8 eyes) with MMD were included in the LVR at an ophthalmology clinic in Portugal. The LVR had a length of 8 weeks and was divided into two phases. The first phase included the use of prisms for image relocation (IR) with eccentric viewing exercises to stabilize the preferred retinal locus. At the second phase, training with low vision aids was performed. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) for distance and near, contrast sensitivity (CS), reading speed (RS) and face recognition were compared pre and post rehabilitation.Results: Patients had MMD category 3 (patchy chorioretinal atrophy) and 4 (macular atrophy) in the best eye. Vision impairment varied between mild and severe. The IR prisms varied from 2 to 6 prism dioptres. Electronic devices were the most prescribed low vision aids. At the end of the LVR, the outcomes were good in all patients. BCVA increased by two to three lines, CS increased by two to four lines, RS increased by 40 to 60 words per minute and face recognition improved in all patients.Conclusions: The LVR was beneficial, improving visual function and functional vision outcomes in all patients. LVR programs seem to be effective in patients with pathologic myopia. Longitudinal studies are necessary to ascertain the long‐term efficacy of LVR.

Effects of low-vision rehabilitation on reading speed and depression in age-related macular degeneration: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a prevalent eye disease, which can lead to vision loss, impacting daily functioning. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of low-vision rehabilitation techniques such as magnifiers, telescopes, and microperimeter feedback, on improving reading speed and reducing depression in AMD patients. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis. A systematic search of databases MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE (OVID), and CINHAL (EBSCO), gray literature including ClinicalTrials.gov and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global (ProQuest), Conferences of The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, American Academy of Ophthalmology, and Canadian Ophthalmological Society were done from inception to 27 July 2022. Fixed-effect and random-effect models were applied to account for heterogeneity between studies. Publication bias was checked through funnel plots. A total of 33 studies (2611 subjects) were included;14 studies were included in the meta-analysis (1123 subjects) and 19 were included in the qualitative analysis. We found a non-significant increase in reading speed (effect size [ES] = 0.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [−0.18, 0.23]) for studies comparing patients who received no low-vision rehabilitation, versus the intervention group of AMD patients who received low-vision rehabilitation. We also found a significant decrease in reading speed (ES = −0.92, 95% CI = [−1.46, −0.39]) between studies evaluating the difference in reading speed at baseline visits compared to the follow-up visits in AMD patients who received low-vision rehabilitation. Low-vision rehabilitation was also found to result in a decrease in depression severity when compared to control groups, as well as from initial assessment to subsequent follow-up visits. Individuals with AMD who engaged in low-vision rehabilitation demonstrated improved reading speeds compared to their own baseline and to those who did not receive any interventions. Furthermore, these interventions also contributed to a reduction in symptoms of depression.