Low-trait Subjects Research Articles

Implicit Memory and Anxiety: Perceptual Identification of Emotional Stimuli

The perceptual identification paradigm was used to examine implicit memory performance in high- and low-trait anxious subjects. A series of threat-related and neutral words was presented in different colours during the encoding phase. Subjects were required to encode the stimuli by naming the colour while ignoring the semantic content of the words (Experiment 1), by simply reading the words (Experiment 2) or by naming the colour of the words and the words themselves (Experiment 3). Experiment 1 demonstrated the predicted emotional Stroop effect, with high-trait subjects taking relatively longer than low-trait subjects to name the colour of the threat-related as compared to the neutral stimuli. All three experiments revealed a significant implicit memory effect overall, with more primed than unprimed words being correctly identified during the perceptual identification task. Subjects in all experiments also identified more of the threat-related than neutral words. Although Experiment 2 found that, overall, the high-trait subjects identified relatively fewer threat-related words than neutral words in comparison to the low-trait subjects, none of the experiments offered any support for the prediction of a threat-related implicit memory bias in hightrait anxiety.

Effects of encoding and anxiety on implicit and explicit memory performance

Normal subjects high and low in trait anxiety were presented with a series of threat-related and neutral words. Subjects encoded the words by either simply reading them or by using self-referenced imagery. Following an unrelated filler task, subjects were presented with an implicit memory task (word-fragment completion; Study 1) or with an explicit memory task (recall; Study 2). No differences were found between subjects high and low in trait anxiety on the explicit task. However, a different pattern of results was demonstrated for the high- and low-trait subjects following self-referenced imagery and read-only encoding for threat-related and neutral stimuli. This dissociation between explicit and implicit memory in anxiety supports the model proposed by Williams, Watts, MacLeod and Mathews ( Cognitive psychology and emotional disorders, 1988).

Anxiety and the allocation of attention to threat.

Using a probe detection technique we have recently demonstrated that anxious subjects consistently deploy attention towards threat-related stimuli, whereas non-anxious controls tend to move attention away from such material (MacLeod, Mathews, & Tata, 1986). The current study employed the same paradigm but attempted to distinguish the role of trait and state anxiety by testing high- and low-trait students when state anxiety was relatively low (12 weeks before a major examination) and again when it was relatively high (one week before this examination). High-trait subjects alone tended to shift attention towards generally threatening material on both test occasions. Results for examination-related stimuli were more complex. Increased proximity to the examination was associated with an increase in attentional bias towards such threat stimuli in high-trait subjects, but with increased attentional avoidance of such stimuli in low-trait subjects. It is suggested that the attentional response to currently relevant stress-related stimuli may be associated with neither trait nor state anxiety alone, but with an interactive function involving both these variables. These results are discussed in relation to existing models of emotion and cognition, and alternative interpretations of the findings are considered.