Low-titer Group O Whole Blood Research Articles

Whole blood: total blood product ratio impacts survival in injured children.

Some studies in both children and adults have shown a mortality benefit for the use of low titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) compared to component therapy for traumatic resuscitation. Although LTOWB is not widely available at pediatric trauma centers, its use is increasing. We hypothesized that in children who received whole blood after injury, the proportion of whole blood in relation to the total blood product resuscitation volume would impact survival. The trauma database from a single academic pediatric level 1 trauma center was queried for pediatric (age < 18 years) recipients of LTOWB after injury (years 2015-2022). Weight-based blood product (LTOWB, red blood cells, plasma and platelet) transfusion volumes during the first 24 hours of admission were recorded. The ratio of LTOWB to total transfusion volume was calculated. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Multivariable logistic regression model adjusted for the following variables: age, sex, mechanism of injury, injury severity score, shock index, and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score. Adjusted odds ratio representing the change in the odds of mortality by a 10% increase in the LTOWB:total transfusion volume ratio was reported. There were 95 pediatric LTOWB recipients included in the analysis, with median (IQR) age of 10 years (5-14), 58% male, median (IQR) injury severity score of 26 (17-35), 25% penetrating mechanism. The median(IQR) volume of LTOWB transfused was 17 (15-35) mL/kg. LTOWB comprised a median (IQR) of 59% (33-100) of the total blood product resuscitation. Among patients who received LTOWB, there was a 38% decrease in in-hospital mortality for each 10% increase in the proportion of WB within total transfusion volume (p < 0.001) after adjusting for age, sex, mechanism of injury, injury severity score, shock index, and GCS score. Increased proportions of LTOWB within the total blood product resuscitation was independently associated with survival in injured children. Based on existing data that suggests safety and improved outcomes with whole blood, consideration may be given to increasing the use of LTOWB over CT resuscitation in pediatric trauma resuscitation. Level 3 Evidence; Observational Cohort Study.

Reconsidering Fresh Frozen Plasma Availability to Reduce Blood Product Waste During Massive Transfusion Events in Trauma.

Within component therapy of massive transfusion protocol (MTP) in trauma, thawed plasma is particularly susceptible to expiring without use given its short 5-day shelf life. Optimizing the number of thawed products without compromising safety is important for hospital resource management. The goal is to examine thawed plasma utilization rates in trauma MTP events and optimize the MTP cooler content at our Level I trauma center. Trauma MTP activations from 01/2019 to 12/2022 were retrospectively reviewed. During the study period, blood products were distributed in a 12:12:1 ratio of packed red blood cells (pRBC): plasma: platelets per cooler, with up to 4 additional units of low-titer, group O whole blood (LTOWB) available. The primary measure was percent return of unused, thawed plasma. There were 367 trauma MTP activations with a median (IQR) activation call-to-first cooler delivery time of 8 (6-10) minutes. 73.0% of thawed plasma was returned to the blood bank unused. In one third of MTP activations, all dispensed plasma was returned. The majority (74.1%) of patients required 6 or fewer units of plasma. In 81.5% of activations, 10 or fewer units of plasma and 10 or fewer units of pRBC were used. The majority of trauma MTP requirements may be accommodated with a reduced cooler content of 6 units pRBC, 6 units plasma, and 1 pheresis platelets, buffered by up to 4 units LTOWB (approximates 4 units of pRBC/4 units plasma), in conjunction with a sub-10min cooler delivery time. Follow-up longitudinal studies are needed.

Receipt of RhD-positive whole blood for life-threatening bleeding in female children: A survey in alloimmunized mothers regarding minimum acceptable survival benefit relative to risk of maternal alloimmunization to anti-D.

Low-titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) for treatment of hemorrhagic shock sometimes necessitates transfusion of RhD-positive units due to short supply of RhD-negative LTOWB. Practitioners must choose between using RhD-positive LTOWB when RhD-negative is unavailable against the risk to a female of childbearing potential of becoming RhD-alloimmunized, risking hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) in future children, or using component therapy with RhD-negative red cells. This survey asked females with a history of red blood cell (RBC) alloimmunization about their risk tolerance of RhD alloimmunization compared to the potential for improved survival following transfusion of RhD-positive blood for an injured RhD negative female child. A survey was administered to RBC alloimmunized mothers. Respondents were eligible if they were living in the United States with at least one red cell antibody known to cause HDFN and if they had at least one RBC alloimmunized pregnancy. Responses from 107 RBC alloimmmunized females were analyzed. There were 32/107 (30%) with a history of severe HDFN; 12/107 (11%) had a history of fetal or neonatal loss due to HDFN. The median (interquartile range) absolute improvement in survival at which the respondents would accept RhD-positive transfusions for a female child was 4% (1%-14%). This was not different between females with and without a history of severe or fatal HDFN (p = .08 and 0.38, respectively). Alloimmunized mothers would accept the risk of D-alloimmunization in a RhD-negative female child for improved survival in cases of life-threatening bleeding.

Survey of policies at US hospitals on the selection of RhD type of low-titer O whole blood for use in trauma resuscitation.

Low-titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) use is increasing due to data suggesting improved outcomes and safety. One barrier to use is low availability of RhD-negative LTOWB. This survey examined US hospital policies regarding the selection of RhD type of blood products in bleeding emergencies. A web-based survey of blood bank directors was conducted to determine their hospital's RhD-type selection policies for blood issued for massive bleeding. There was a 61% response rate (101/157) and of those responses, 95 were complete. Respondents indicated that 40% (38/95) use only red blood cells (RBCs) and 60% (57/95) use LTOWB. For hospitals that issue LTOWB (N = 57), 67% are supplied only with RhD-positive, 2% only with RhD-negative, and 32% with both RhD-positive and RhD-negative LTOWB. At sites using LTOWB, RhD-negative LTOWB is used exclusively or preferentially more commonly in adult females of childbearing potential (FCP) (46%) and pediatric FCP (55%) than in men (4%) and boys (24%). RhD-positive LTOWB is used exclusively or preferentially more commonly in men (94%) and boys (54%) than in adult FCP (40%) or pediatric FCP (21%). At sites using LTOWB, it is not permitted for adult FCPs at 12%, pediatric FCP at 21.4%, and boys at 17.1%. Hospitals prefer issuing RhD-negative LTOWB for females although they are often ineligible to receive RhD-negative LTOWB due to supply constraints. The risk and benefits of LTOWB compared to the rare occurrence of hemolytic disease of the fetus/newborn (HDFN) need further examination in the context of withholding a therapy for females that has the potential for improved outcomes.

Ethical considerations in the use of RhD-positive blood products in trauma.

Prehospital and early in-hospital use of low titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) for life-threatening bleeding has been independently associated with improved survival compared to component therapy. However, when RhD-positive blood products are administered to RhD-negative females of childbearing potential (FCP), there is a small future risk of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). This raises important ethical questions that must be explored in order to justify the use of RhD-positive blood products, including LTOWB, both in clinical practice and research. This essay explores the ethical challenges related to RhD-positive blood product administration to RhD-negative or RhD-unknown FCPs as a first-line resuscitation fluid in the trauma setting. These ethical issues include: issues related to decision-making, ethical analysis based on the doctrine of double effect (DDE), and attendant obligations incurred by hospitals that administer RhD-positive blood to FCPs. Ethical analysis through the use of the DDE demonstrates that utilization of RhD-positive blood products, including LTOWB, in the early resuscitation of FCPs is an ethically appropriate approach. By accepting the risk of HDFN, hospitals generate obligations to promote blood donation, evaluate for alloimmunization and counsel patients on the future risk of HDFN, and maintain an understanding of the ethical rationale for RhD-positive blood transfusion.

The Efficacy of Low-Titer Group O Whole Blood Compared With Component Therapy in Civilian Trauma Patients: A Meta-Analysis.

To assess if transfusion with low-titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) is associated with improved early and/or late survival compared with component blood product therapy (CT) in bleeding trauma patients. A systematic search of PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science was performed from their inception through December 1, 2023. Key terms included injury, hemorrhage, bleeding, blood transfusion, and whole blood. All studies comparing outcomes in injured civilian adults and children who received LTOWB versus CT were included. Data including author, publication year, sample size, total blood volumes, and clinical outcomes were extracted from each article and reported following the Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. Main outcomes were 24-hour (early) and combined 28-day, 30-day, and in-hospital (late) mortality rates between recipients of LTOWB versus CT, which were pooled using random-effects models. Of 1297 studies reviewed, 24 were appropriate for analysis. Total subjects numbered 58,717 of whom 5,164 received LTOWB. Eleven studies included adults-only, seven included both adults and adolescents, and six only included children. The median (interquartile range) age for patients who received LTOWB and CT was 35 years (24-39) and 35.5 years (23-39), respectively. Overall, 14 studies reported early mortality and 22 studies reported late mortality. LTOWB was associated with improved 24-hour survival (risk ratios [RRs] [95% CI] = 1.07 [1.03-1.12]) and late (RR [95% CI] = 1.05 [1.01-1.09]) survival compared with component therapy. There was no evidence of small study bias and all studies were graded as a moderate level of bias. These data suggest hemostatic resuscitation with LTOWB compared with CT improves early and late survival outcomes in bleeding civilian trauma patients. The majority of subjects were injured adults; multicenter randomized controlled studies in injured adults and children are underway to confirm these findings.

The first two years of the use of low titer group O whole blood during French Military overseas operations: A retrospective study.

On the battlefield, hemorrhage is the main cause of potentially preventable death. To reduce mortality due to hemorrhagic injuries, the French Military Medical Service (FMMS) has deployed low titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) since June 2021 during operation BARKHANE in the Sahel-Saharan strip. Questions persist regarding the circumstances under which the FMMS employs LTOWB during overseas operations. We performed a retrospective analysis of all LTOWB transfused by the FMMS during overseas operations in the Sahel-Saharan strip between June 1, 2021, and June 1, 2023. Information was collected from battlefield forward transfusion sheets. Over the 2-year study period, 40 units of LTOWB were transfused into 25 patients. Of the 25 patients, 18 were combat casualties and seven were transfused for non-trauma surgery. Of the 40 units of LTOWB transfused, 22 were provided during Role 2 care, 11 during tactical medical evacuation (MEDEVAC), and seven in light and mobile surgical units. Among combat casualties, LTOWB was the first blood product transfused in 13 patients. In combat casualties, 6 h post-trauma, the median ratio of plasma: red blood cells (RBCs) was 1.5, and the median equivalent platelet concentrate (PC) transfused was 0.17. No immediate adverse events related to LTOWB transfusion were reported. LTOWB is transfused by the FMMS during overseas operations from the tactical MEDEVAC until Role 2 care. Deployment of LTOWB by the FMMS enables an early high-ratio plasma/RBC transfusion and an early platelet transfusion for combat casualties.

Maternal and child life years gained by transfusing low titer group O whole blood in trauma: A computer simulation.

Using low titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) is increasingly popular for resuscitating trauma patients. LTOWB is often RhD-positive, which might cause D-alloimmunization and hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) if transfused to RhD-negative females of childbearing potential (FCP). This simulation determined the number of life years gained by the FCP and her future children if she was resuscitated with LTOWB compared with conventional component therapy (CCT). The model simulated 500,000 injured FCPs of each age between 0 and 49 years with LTOWB mortality relative reductions (MRRs) compared with components between 0.1% and 25%. For each surviving FCP, number of life years gained was calculated using her age at injury and average life expectancy for American women. The number of expected future pregnancies for FCPs that did not survive was also based on her age at injury; each future child was assigned the maximum lifespan unless they suffered perinatal mortality or serious neurological events from HDFN. The LTOWB group with an MRR 25% compared with CCT had the largest total life years gained. The point of equivalence for RhD-positive LTOWB compared to CCT, where life years lost due to severe HDFN was equivalent to life years gained due to FCP survival/future childbearing, occurred at an MRR of approximately 0.1%. In this model, RhD-positive LTOWB resulted in substantial gains in maternal and child life years compared with CCT. A >0.1% relative mortality reduction from LTOWB offset the life years lost to HDFN mortality and severe neurological events.

Deploying whole blood to the battlefield-The Israel Defense Forces Medical Corps initial experience during the 2023 war.

Military and prehospital medical organizations invest significant resources to advance the treatment of trauma patients aiming to reduce preventable deaths. Focus is on hemorrhage control and volume resuscitation with blood products, with adoption of Remote Damage Control Resuscitation (RDCR) guidelines. The Israel Defense Forces Medical Corps (IDF-MC) has been using tranexamic acid and freeze-dried plasma (FDP) as part of its RDCR protocol for more than a decade. In recent years, low-titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) has been integrated, on IDF evacuation helicopters and expanded to mobile ambulances, complementing FDP use in treating trauma patients in state of profound shock. During the war that erupted in October 2023, the IDF-MC made a decision to bring LTOWB forward, and to equip every combat brigade level mobile intensive care units with LTOWB, onboard armored vehicles. The goal was to make whole blood available as close as possible to the point of injury and within minutes from time of injury. We describe the IDF-MCs' efforts to bring LTOWB to the front lines and present four cases in which LTOWB was administered. All patients were young male, with significant blood loss following penetrating injuries. One patient died in the operating room, following hospital arrival and emergency thoracotomy. The others survived. Our initial experience with bringing LTOWB as close as possible to the point of injury during high intensity fighting is encouraging, showing patient benefit along with logistic feasibility. After action reports and data collection will continue.

Low titer group O whole blood and risk of RhD alloimmunization: Rationale for use in Finland.

Prehospital low-titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) used for patients with life-threatening hemorrhage is often RhD positive. The most important complication following RhD alloimmunization is hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). Preceding clinical use of RhD positive LTOWB, we estimated the risk of HDFN due to LTOWB prehospital transfusion in the Finnish population. We collected data on prehospital transfusions in Tampere and Helsinki University Hospital areas. Using the mean of reported alloimmunization rates in trauma studies (24%) and a higher reported rate representing trauma patients of 13-50 years old (42.7%), we estimated the risk of HDFN and extrapolated it to the whole of Finland. We estimated that in Finland, with the current prehospital transfusion rate we would see 1-3 cases of severe HDFN due to prehospital LTOWB transfusions every 10 years, and fetal death due to HDFN caused by LTOWB transfusion less than once in 100 years. The estimated risk of serious HDFN due to prehospital LTOWB transfusion in the Finnish population is similar to previous estimates. As Finland routinely screens expectant mothers for red blood cell antibodies and as the contemporary treatment of HDFN is very effective, we support the prehospital use of RhD positive LTOWB in all patient groups.

Prescreened Whole O Blood Group Walking Blood Bank Capabilities for Nontraditional Maritime Medical Receiving Platforms: A Case Series.

Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) guidelines recognize low-titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) as the resuscitative fluid of choice for combat wounded. Utilization of prescreened LTOWB in a walking blood bank (WBB) format has been well described by the Ranger O low-titer blood (ROLO) and the United States Marine Corps Valkyrie programs, but it has not been applied to the maritime setting. We describe three WBB experiences of an expeditionary resuscitative surgical system (ERSS) team, attached to three nontraditional maritime medical receiving platforms, over 6 months. Significant variations were identified in the number of screened eligible donors, the number of LTOWB donors, and the timely arrival at WBB activation sites between the platforms. Overall, 95% and 84% of the screened eligible group O blood donors on the Arleigh Burke Class Destroyer (DDG) and Nimitz Class Aircraft Carrier (CVN), respectively, were determined to be LTOWB. However, only 37% of the eligible screened group O blood donors aboard the Harper's Ferry Class Dock Landing Ship (LSD) were found to be LTOWB. Of the eligible donors, 66% did not complete screening, with 52% citing a correctable reason for nonparticipation. LTOWB attained through WBBs may be the only practical resuscitative fluid on maritime platforms without inherent blood product storage capabilities to perform remote damage control resuscitation. Future efforts should focus on optimizing WBBs through capability development, education, and training efforts.

Low-titer group O whole blood in military ground ambulances: Lessons from the Israel Defense Forces initial experience.

Cold-stored low-titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) has become increasingly utilised in both prehospital and in-hospital settings for resuscitation of traumatic haemorrhage. However, implementing the use of LTOWB to ground medical teams has been limited due to logistic challenges. In 2022, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) started using LTOWB in ambulances for the first time in Israel. This report details the initial experience of this rollout and presents a case-series of the first patients treated with LTOWB. Between January-December 2022, seven trauma patients received LTOWB administered by ground IDF intensive care ambulances after presenting with profound shock. Median time from injury to administration of LTOWB was 35 min. All patients had evidence of severe bleeding upon hospital arrival with six undergoing damage control laparotomy and all but one surviving to discharge. The implementation of LTOWB in ground medical units is in its early stages, but continued experience may demonstrate its feasibility, safety, and effectiveness in the prehospital setting. Further research is necessary to fully understand the indications, methodology, and benefits of LTOWB in resuscitating severely injured trauma patients in this setting.

Incompatible plasma transfusion is not associated with increased mortality in civilian trauma patients

ABSTRACTBackgroundThe introduction of low titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) that contains potentially ABO-incompatible plasma and the increasing use of group A plasma, due to shortages of AB plasma, in trauma patients whose ABO group is unknown could put the recipients of incompatible plasma at risk of increased morbidity and mortality. This study evaluated civilian trauma patient outcomes following receipt of incompatible plasma.MethodsOne trauma center’s patient contributions to three multicenter studies of different trauma resuscitation strategies was analyzed; these patients were separated into two groups based on receipt of only compatible plasma versus receipt of any quantity of incompatible plasma. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine if receipt of incompatible plasma was associated with 24-hour or 30-day mortality.ResultsThere were 347 patients eligible for this secondary analysis with 167 recipients of only compatible plasma and 180 recipients of incompatible plasma. The two groups were well matched demographically and on both prehospital and hospital arrival vital signs. The median (IQR) volume of incompatible plasma received by these patients was 684 ml (342, 1229). There was not a significant difference between the groups in 24-hour and 30-day mortality, nor in in-hospital or intensive care unit lengths of stay. In the Cox proportional-hazards regression model for both 24-hour and 30-day survival, receipt of incompatible plasma was not independently predictive of either mortality endpoint.ConclusionReceipt of incompatible plasma was not independently associated with increased mortality in trauma patients. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Variations in low titer group O whole blood practices in the United States

Aims: Blood banking is a strictly monitored industry in the United States (US) with regulatory bodies and accrediting agencies establishing and enforcing standards for the collection, testing, and transfusion of blood products. However, there is a lack of standardization for the increasingly popular blood product low titer group O whole blood (LTOWB). The aims of our survey were to assess the degree of variation in the processes and procedures involved in the collection, manufacture, testing, storage, and transfusion of LTOWB products, which could serve as a resource for establishing future standards. Methods: A survey was written using Qualtrics software. The link to the online survey was sent via email to individuals practicing within blood collection and transfusing facilities in the US. The email addresses were obtained using contact databases from two professional immunohematology and transfusion medicine organizations and one specialist in blood banking (SBB) academic program. Results: A total of 64 responses demonstrates vastly varying practices between facilities among the donor acceptance criteria, antibody titer testing methodology, frequency of donor testing, antibody isotype tested, acceptable titer level, blood component manufacturing process, unit limit per patient, and where and when the units are transfused. Conclusion: The collection and transfusion of LTOWB products continues to increase in the US, but there is notable variability in the manufacture, testing, storage, and transfusion of LTOWB products due to the few defined standards regarding LTOWB including an established acceptable titer threshold. The degree of variation among facilities that collect, test, and transfuse LTOWB is clearly apparent throughout the US.

An assessment of the safety, hemostatic efficacy, and clinical impact of low-titer group O whole blood in children and adolescents.

Low-titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) use has been associated with improved survival and less blood transfusions in adult trauma patients. Its use in pediatric trauma has been shown to be safe when using leukoreduced, LTOWB with anti-A, anti-B antibody titers of <1:50. We set out to evaluate the safety, hemostatic potential, and impact on pediatric outcomes at a center using non-leukoreduced, LTOWB with anti-A, anti-B antibody titers of <1:200. Patients younger than 18 years, who received emergency-release, uncrossed matched blood, and presented to our trauma center from November 2017 to April 2021 were included. Patients were divided into those receiving any LTOWB and those receiving only RBC and or plasma (COMP). Primary outcome was 30-day survival. One hundred sixty-four patients received emergency release blood products. Of these, 73 received at least one unit of LTOWB. The LTOWB group were younger (14 years vs. 13 years), more likely to be male (87% vs. 49%), and to have sustained penetrating trauma (44% vs. 23%); all p < 0.05. Low-titer group O whole blood patients received more blood than their COMP counterparts prior to arrival. Serial hemolysis panels (K+, bilirubin, LDH, haptoglobin) obtained at 24 hours, 48 hours, and 72 hours were similar between groups; all p > 0.05. There was no difference in survival by univariate analysis but after adjusting for inverse probability of treatment weights there was an observed association between WB administration and improved survival, with an odds ratio of 2.48 (1.15-5.47). Non-leukoreduced, LTOWB in anti-A/anti-B antibody titers of <1:200 appear safe in children and adolescents. While patients receiving LTOWB had more evidence of shock, higher torso injury severity, and received more prehospital blood products, there may be a mortality benefit with whole blood. Larger, multicenter studies are needed. Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

Delayed Leukoreduction of whole blood with a platelet-sparing filter to increase low-titer group O whole blood production in the United States.

Demand for low-titer Group O whole blood (LTOWB) is increasing for trauma. The whole blood (WB) platelet-sparing (WB-SP) filter enables leukoreduction (LR) while retaining platelet quantity and function; however, in the United States WB must be filtered and placed in the cold within 8 h of collection. A longer processing window would facilitate improved logistics and supply of LR-WB to meet the growing medical need. This study evaluated the impact of increasing filtration timing from <8 h to <12 h on the quality of LR-WB. Thirty WB units were collected from healthy donors. Control units were filtered within 8 h and test units within 12 h of collection. WB was tested throughout 21 days of storage. Hemolysis, WBC content, component recovery, and 25 additional markers of WB quality were tested including hematologic and metabolic markers, RBC morphology, aggregometry, thromboelastography, and p-selectin. There were 0 failures for residual WBC content, hemolysis, or pH, and no differences in component recovery between arms. Few differences in metabolic parameters were observed, but the small effect size suggests these are not clinically significant. Trends throughout storage were similar and filtration timing did not impact hematological parameters, platelet activation and aggregation, or hemostatic capacity. Our studies showed that extending filtration timing from 8 to 12 h from the collection does not significantly impact the quality of LR-WB. Characterization of the platelets demonstrated that storage lesions were not exacerbated. Extending the time from collection to filtration will improve LTOWB inventory in the United States.

Transfusion of ABO-group identical red blood cells following uncrossmatched transfusion does not lead to higher mortality in civilian trauma patients.

Questions persist about the safety of switching non-group O recipients of group O uncrossmatched red blood cells (RBC) or low titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) to ABO-identical RBCs during their resuscitation. The database of an earlier nine-center study of transfusing incompatible plasma to trauma patients was reanalyzed. The patients were divided into three groups based on 24-h RBC transfusion: (1) group O patients who received group O RBC/LTOWB units (control group, n = 1203), (2) non-group O recipients who received only group O units (n = 646), (3) non-group O recipients who received at least one unit of group O and non-group O units (n = 562). Fixed marginal effect of receipt of non-O RBC units on 6- and 24-h and 30-day mortality was calculated. The non-O patients who received only group O RBCs received fewer RBC/LTOWB units and had slightly but significantly lower injury severity score compared to control group; non-group O patients who received both group O and non-O units received significantly more RBC/LTOWB units and had a slightly but significantly higher injury severity score compared to control group. In the multivariate analysis, the non-O patients who received only group O RBCs had significantly higher mortality at 6-h compared to the controls; the non-group O recipients of O and non-O RBCs did not demonstrate higher mortality. At 24-h and 30-days, there were no differences in survival between the groups. Providing non-group O RBCs to non-group O trauma patients who also received group O RBC units is not associated with higher mortality.

Receipt of low titer group O whole blood does not lead to hemolysis in children weighing less than 20 kilograms.

The safety of Low Titer Group O Whole Blood (LTOWB) transfusion has not been well-studied in small children. This is a single-center retrospective cohort study of pediatric recipients of RhD-LTOWB (June 2016-October 2022) who weigh less than 20 kilograms. Biochemical markers of hemolysis (lactate dehydrogenase, total bilirubin, haptoglobin, and reticulocyte count) and renal function (creatinine and potassium) were recorded on the day of LTOWB transfusion and post-transfusion days 1 and 2. Group O and non-Group O recipients were compared. Twenty-one children were included. Their median (interquartile range [IQR]) weight was 12 kg (12-18) with minimum 2.8 kg, and median (IQR) age was 3 years (1.75-5.00) with minimum 0.08 years (29 days old). The most common indication for transfusion was trauma (17/21; 81%). The median (IQR) volume of LTOWB transfused was 30 mL/kg (20-42). There were 9 non-group O and 12 group O recipients. There were no statistically significant differences in the median concentrations of any of the biochemical markers of hemolysis or the renal function markers between the non-group O and the group O recipients at any of the three time points (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). There were also no statistically significant differences in demographic parameters or clinical outcomes including 28-day mortality, length of stay, ventilator days, and venous thromboembolism between the groups. No transfusion reactions were reported in either group. These data suggest LTOWB use is safe in children weighing less than 20 kg. Further multi-center studies and larger cohorts are needed to confirm these results.

Emergency transfusion with whole blood versus packed red blood cells: A study of 1400 patients.

Low-titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) is increasingly used for emergency transfusion. We studied whether initial release of LTOWB compared with packed red blood cells (pRBCs) reduced overall blood requirements for patients needing emergency transfusion. Secondary outcomes examined included survival and non-lethal adverse clinical outcomes. A retrospective, single-center, before-versus-after study compared patients transfused with emergency-release, uncrossmatched pRBC followed by component therapy (2016-2019) versus patients transfused with emergency-release, uncrossmatched LTOWB followed by component therapy (2019-2022). Outcomes were available for 602 patients in the pRBC group versus 749 in the whole blood group. The two groups were similar for age, sex, race, estimated blood volume, ABO blood groups, and underlying diagnosis. Use of LTOWB was associated with increased blood product use at 24 h (4.0 (2.0-12.0) in pRBC group versus 6.5 (4.2-12.7) in LTOWB group, p < .0001) and at 7 days (5.5 (3.0-13.0) in pRBC group versus 7.3 (4.3-14.3) in LTOWB group, p < .0001). Initial use of LTOWB was not associated with improved 24 h or 30 day survival nor lower incidence of non-lethal adverse clinical outcomes compared with pRBC. Our study showed a statistically significant increase in total blood use and blood acquisition costs for patients receiving initial emergency transfusion with LTOWB compared with pRBC. The initial use of LTOWB offered no advantage over component therapy for 30 day survival or selected non-lethal adverse outcomes.

Not as “D”eadly as once thought – the risk of D-alloimmunization and hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn following RhD-positive transfusion in trauma

ABSTRACTThe use of blood products to resuscitate injured and massively bleeding patients in the prehospital and early in-hospital phase of the resuscitation is increasing. Using group O red blood cells (RBC) and low titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) avoids an immediate hemolytic reaction from recipient’s naturally occurring anti-A and – B, but choosing the RhD type for these products is more nuanced and requires the balancing of product availability and survival benefit against the risk of D-alloimmunization, especially in females of childbearing potential (FCP) due to the possible future occurrence of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). Recent models have estimated the risk of fetal/neonatal death from HDFN resulting from D-alloimmunization of an FCP during her trauma resuscitation at between 0-6.5% depending on her age at the time of the transfusion and other societal factors including trauma mortality, her age when she becomes pregnant, frequency of different RHD genotypes in the population, and the probability that the woman will have children with different fathers; this is counterbalanced by an approximately 24% risk of death from hemorrhagic shock. This review will discuss the different models of HDFN outcomes following RhD-positive transfusion as well as the results of recent surveys where the public was asked about their preferences for urgent transfusion in light of the risks of fetal/neonatal adverse events.