Low Osmolar Ionic Contrast Media Research Articles

Antithrombotic Effects of Ionic and Non-ionic Contrast Media in Nonhuman Primates

Thromboembolic complications have been attributed to the use of radiographic contrast media (CM) during interventional procedures for arterial revascularization. However, due to the low frequency of adverse events, comparisons between different CM have been difficult to perform, although it has been suggested that ionic (vs. non-ionic) CM may be associated with fewer thrombotic events. The present study was undertaken using well-characterized baboon thrombosis models in order to compare different CM under physiologically relevant and controlled conditions of blood flow, exposure time, and CM concentration. Three CM were studied: ioxaglate, iohexol, and iodixanol. CM were locally infused into the proximal segment of femoral arteriovenous shunts. Palmaz-Schatz stents (4 mm i.d.) and expanded tubular segments (9 mm i.d.), which exhibited venous-type flow recirculation and stasis, were deployed into the shunts distally. Saline was infused in identical control studies. Blood flow was maintained at 100 ml/min. Thrombosis was measured over a blood exposure period of 2 hours by gamma camera imaging of 111In-platelets and by gamma counting of deposited 125I-fibrin. CM concentrations within the flowfield were predicted using computational fluid dynamics. At infusion rates of 0.1 and 0.3 ml/min, the low-osmolar ionic CM ioxaglate reduced both platelet and fibrin deposition on the stents by 75-80% (p <0.005), while both iohexol and iodixanol reduced platelet deposition by 30-50% (p <0.05). In the regions of low shear flow, ioxaglate (0.3 ml/min) also reduced platelet deposition significantly (by 52% vs. control results; p <0.05). Thus the three agents evaluated--ioxaglate, iohexol, and iodixanol--all produced anticoagulant and antiplatelet effects and were inherently antithrombotic in vivo. The most striking effects were seen with the low osmolarity, ionic contrast agent ioxaglate.

In vivo effects of contrast media on coronary thrombolysis

Objectives. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the influence of radiographic contrast media (CM) on alteplase-induced coronary thrombolysis.Background. Contrast media inhibit fibrinolysis in vitro and interact with endothelial cells, platelets and the coagulation system. The in vivo effects of CM on thrombolysis are not known.Methods. Occlusive coronary artery thrombosis was induced in 4 groups of 10 dogs by the copper coil technique. After 70 min of occlusion the dogs were randomized to intracoronary injection of 2 ml kg−1of either saline, a low-osmolar ionic CM (ioxaglate), a low-osmolar nonionic CM (iohexol) or a high-osmolar ionic CM (amidotrizoate). Thrombolysis with alteplase and co-therapy with aspirin and heparin was initiated after 90 min of occlusion. The coronary artery flow was monitored with an electromagnetic flowmeter throughout the experiment.Results. Iohexol and amidotrizoate, but not ioxaglate, were associated with longer reperfusion delays (time to optimal reperfusion: 67 ± 48 min and 65 ± 49 min, respectively, vs. 21 ± 11 min after placebo; p < 0.05) and shorter periods of coronary perfusion (optimal perfusion time: 21 ± 26 min and 21 ± 28 min, respectively, vs. 58 ± 40 min after placebo; p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed between groups with regard to activated partial thromboplastin times, circulating thrombin-antithrombin III complex concentrations and fibrinogen.Conclusions. In this animal model administration of iohexol and amidotrizoate before thrombolysis significantly delayed reperfusion. This interaction should be considered in the design of clinical trials of thrombolytic therapy that evaluate coronary artery patency and in patients receiving local infusions of fibrinolytic agents.

Low-osmolar ionic contrast media was better than nonionic media for ischemic complications of angioplasty

Source Citation Grines CL, Schreiber TL, Savas V, et al. A randomized trial of low osmolar ionic versus nonionic contrast media in patients with myocardial infarction or unstable angina undergoing ...

A randomized trial of low osmolar ionic versus nonionic contrast media in patients with myocardial infarction or unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

Objectives. The purpose of this study was to determine prospectively whether the differences in anticoagulant and antiplatelet effects of ionic and nonionic contrast media alter angiographic or clinical outcomes in patients with unstable ischemic syndromes undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.Background. The interaction of platelets and thrombin with the endothelium of injured vessels contributes to thrombosis and restenosis after coronary angioplasty. Case reports and retrospective observations have reported an increased risk of thrombosis with the use of nonionic contrast media.Methods. A total of 211 patients with acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina undergoing coronary angioplasty were randomized to receive nonionic or ionic low osmolar contrast media. Coronary angiograms were assessed by a technician blinded to the study contrast media, and clinical events were monitored by an independent nurse for 1 month.Results. Patients receiving the ionic media were significantly less likely to experience decreased blood flow during the procedure (8.1% vs. 17.8%, p = 0.04). After the angioplasty, residual stenosis, vessel patency, the incidence of moderate to large thrombi and use of adjunctive thrombolytic therapy were similar between the two groups. However, patients receiving ionic media had fewer recurrent ischemic events requiring repeat catheterization (3.0% vs. 11.4%, p = 0.02) and repeat angioplasty during the initial hospital stay (1.0% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.06). One month after angioplasty, patients receiving ionic contrast media reported significantly fewer symptoms of any angina (8.5 vs. 20.0%, p = 0.04) or of angina at rest (1.4% vs. 11.8%, p = 0.01) and a reduced need for subsequent bypass surgery (0% vs. 5.9%, p = 0.04), compared with patients receiving the nonionic media.Conclusions. These findings demonstrate that in patients with unstable ischemic syndromes undergoing coronary angioplasty, the use of ionic low osmolar contrast media reduces the risk of ischemic complications acutely and at 1 mouth after the procedure. Therefore, low osmolar ionic contrast media should be strongly certified when performing interventions in patients with unstable angina or myocardial infarction.