Low Molecular Weight Heparin Group Research Articles

Aspirin versus low-molecular-weight heparin for thromboprophylaxis after orthopaedic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The article aimed to compare the efficiency and safety of aspirin with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for thromboprophylaxis in orthopaedic surgery patients. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library database were searched for studies comparing aspirin and LMWH in venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis until 25 April 2023. The outcome measures included deep venous thrombosis(DVT)/Pulmonary embolism(PE) events, major bleeding events, wound complications, wound infection and death. Six studies met the requirements of our meta-analysis, including 12 470 patients in the aspirin group and 10 857 patients in the LMWH group. The meta-analysis showed that results showed that LMWH was superior to aspirin in preventing VTE events (odds ratio (OR) 1.44, 95% CI 1.24-1.68, P < 0.00001), whereas there was no significant difference between them in bleeding events (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.86-1.05, P = 0.33), wound complication (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.28-1.17, P = 0.13), wound infection (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.86-1.47, P = 0.39) and mortality (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.70-1.55, P = 0.83). In addition, subgroup analysis showed that compared with aspirin, LMWH was more likely to reduce the incidence of DVT events in orthopaedic surgery patients (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.33-1.91, P < 0.00001), whereas there was no advantage in reducing the incidence of PE events (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.62-2.40, P = 0.56). Despite the similar safety profiles, this meta-analysis showed that LMWH was significantly superior to aspirin in thromboprophylaxis after orthopaedic surgery. LMWH was still the first-line drug for thrombosis prevention in patients who underwent major orthopaedic surgeries.

Propensity weighted analysis of chemical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis agents in isolated severe traumatic brain injury: An EAST sponsored multicenter study

BackgroundIn patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), clinicians must balance preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) with the risk of intracranial hemorrhagic expansion (ICHE). We hypothesized that low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) would not increase risk of ICHE or VTE as compared to unfractionated heparin (UH) in patients with severe TBI. MethodsPatients ≥ 18 years of age with isolated severe TBI (AIS ≥ 3), admitted to 24 level I and II trauma centers between January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2020 and who received subcutaneous UH and LMWH injections for chemical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (VTEP) were included. Primary outcomes were VTE and ICHE after VTEP initiation. Secondary outcomes were mortality and neurosurgical interventions. Entropy balancing (EBAL) weighted competing risk or logistic regression models were estimated for all outcomes with chemical VTEP agent as the predictor of interest. Results984 patients received chemical VTEP, 482 UH and 502 LMWH. Patients on LMWH more often had pre-existing conditions such as liver disease (UH vs LMWH 1.7 % vs. 4.4 %, p = 0.01), and coagulopathy (UH vs LMWH 0.4 % vs. 4.2 %, p < 0.001). There were no differences in VTE or ICHE after VTEP initiation. There were no differences in neurosurgical interventions performed. There were a total of 29 VTE events (3 %) in the cohort who received VTEP. A Cox proportional hazards model with a random effect for facility demonstrated no statistically significant differences in time to VTE across the two agents (p = 0.44). The LMWH group had a 43 % lower risk of overall ICHE compared to the UH group (HR = 0.57: 95 % CI = 0.32–1.03, p = 0.062), however was not statistically significant. ConclusionIn this multi-center analysis, patients who received LMWH had a decreased risk of ICHE, with no differences in VTE, ICHE after VTEP initiation and neurosurgical interventions compared to those who received UH. There were no safety concerns when using LMWH compared to UH. Level of evidenceLevel III, Therapeutic Care Management

Effectiveness of Taohong Siwu decoction in the prevention of deep vein thrombosis in hip surgery patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of Taohong Siwu Decoction (THSWD) combined with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), as well as THSWD alone, on the incidence of Deep vein thrombosis (DVT), D-dimer levels, prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, and calf swelling in patients undergoing hip fracture or replacement surgery, compared to LMWH. According to the predefined inclusion criteria, we conducted a comprehensive search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the efficacy of THSWD combined with LMWH or THSWD compared to LMWH in patients with hip fractures or undergoing replacement surgery. The search was performed across multiple databases including China National Knowledge Internet, WanFang, Sinomed, Duxiu, PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, Cochrane, and Web of Science from their inception until December 2023. Additionally, relevant literature references were retrieved and hand searching of pertinent journals was conducted. The methodological quality assessment of the included trials was carried out following the guidelines outlined in the Cochrane Handbook. Review Manager 5.4 was applied in analyzing and synthesizing. A total of 18 RCTs with 1353 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that compared with the control group, the combined group had a better effect on the incidence of DVT [RR = 0.32, 95% CI(0.17, 0.58; P = .0002], D-dimer [SMD = -5.88, 95% CI(-7.66, -4.11); P < .00001], VAS [MD = -1.16, 95% CI(-1.81, -0.50); P = .0005], Calf circumference difference [MD = -0.56, 95% CI(-1.05, -0.08); P = .02]. There was no significant difference in PT and APTT between the combined group and the control group. Meta-analysis results show that the D-dimer, incidence of DVT, PT, and APTT did not significantly differ between the THSWD and the LMWH groups. This meta-analysis shows that compared with LMWH, THSWD combined with LMWH has a better efficacy in the treatment of DVT after hip surgery, without a significant increase in the incidence of adverse events. Additionally, the combined therapy can also reduce D-dimer, VAS, and swelling. However, due to the limitations of the included studies (such as small sample size and low-quality evidence), the results need to be further verified in more rigorous multicenter clinical trials with a large sample size.

Aspirin is as effective as low molecular weight heparins in preventing symptomatic venous thromboembolism following arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

ObjectiveThe optimal agent for thromboprophylaxis following arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) remains unclear, particularly in patients with a low baseline risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). This retrospective cohort study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of aspirin versus low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) in this specific patient population.MethodsWe analyzed data from patients who underwent ACLR between March 2016 and March 2021, focusing on those with a low risk for VTE. High-risk individuals, identified by factors such as cardiac disease, pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, previous VTE, inflammatory bowel disease, active cancer, and a BMI > 40, were excluded (n = 33). Our approach included a thorough review of medical charts, surgical reports, and pre-operative assessments, complemented by telephone follow-up conducted over a 3-month period by a single investigator. We assessed the incidence of symptomatic VTE, including deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary thromboembolism, as the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes included to complications related to the surgery and thromboprophylaxis. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, univariate logistic regression models, and calculations of incidence rates.ResultIn our study, 761 patients (761 knees) were included, with 458 (60.18%) receiving aspirin and 303 (39.82%) receiving LMWH. The two groups showed no significant differences in demographic factors except for age. The incidence of VTE was reported at 1.31% (10 individuals). Specifically, five patients in the aspirin group (1.09%) and five patients in the LMWH group (1.65%) developed a symptomatic VTE event (p = 0.53). Additionally, the two groups did not significantly differ in terms of other complications, such as hemarthrosis or surgical site infection (p > 0.05). Logistic regression analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in VTE risk between the two groups.ConclusionThis study, focusing on isolated ACLR in patients with a low baseline risk for venous thromboembolism, demonstrated that aspirin is equally effective as low molecular weight heparins for VTE prophylaxis following this surgery.Level of EvidenceIII

A randomized, controlled clinical study of low-molecular-weight heparin improving pregnancy outcomes in PCOS women undergoing IVF: study protocol

BackgroundPolycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), an incidence of 10–15% in women of reproductive age, shows sex hormone disorders, luteal insufficiency, and the tendency of placental villus space thrombus. The incidence of early pregnancy loss in women with PCOS is three to eight times higher than that in non-PCOS women. PCOS women were reported in a pre-thrombotic state, which was manifested by accelerated thrombin production, increased PAI-1 activity, and fibrinogen. Other research also found an over-activated state of women with PCOS in immune system. Therefore, changing the prethrombotic state of PCOS through anticoagulation may be a new way to improve the adverse pregnancy outcome of PCOS. Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is the most common used anticoagulant drug in pregnancy, and it also was proposed for the prevention of recurrent abortion, although the application of LMWH in PCOS population during early pregnancy has not been reported. The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of LMWH on pregnancy outcomes after invitro fertilization-frozen embryo transfer (IVF-FET) in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome.MethodsA total of 356 PCOS women aged between 20 and 38 years which prepared for IVF followed with FET will be enrolled in the study. The patients, from four different hospitals stratified by age and body mass index (BMI), will be randomly divided into the study group who will be treated with LMWH started on the day of progesterone transformation (hormone therapy) during FET cycle and the control group without additional medicine. Serum or urine hCG test will be given 14 days after embryo transfer to confirm biochemical pregnancy. If pregnancy is positive, LMWH+ hormone therapy/hormone therapy will be continued for another 2 weeks. Transvaginal ultrasonography will be performed 14 days later to confirm intrauterine pregnancy. The primary outcome is the ongoing pregnancy, which is defined as intrauterine live fetus with ultrasound after 12 weeks of gestation.DiscussionThis is the first study protocol to investigate the efficacy of LMWH as an adjuvant drug for IVF-FET outcomes in PCOS women, by comparing differences in ongoing pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate, and early pregnancy loss rate between LMWH group and the control group.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov ChiCTR2000036527. Registered on August 24, 2020

The effect and mechanism of low-molecular-weight heparin on the decidualization of stromal cells in early pregnancy

Objective This study aimed to analyze the effect of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) on the decidualization of stromal cells in early pregnancy and explore the effect of LMWH on pregnancy outcomes. Methods Recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA) mouse model (CBA/J × DBA/2) and normal pregnant mouse model (CBA/J × BALB/c) were established. The female mice were checked for a mucus plug twice daily to identify a potential pregnancy. When a mucus plug was found, conception was considered to have occurred 12 h previously. The pregnant mice were divided randomly into a normal pregnancy control group, an RSA model group, and an RSA + LMWH experimental group (n = 10 mice in each group). Halfway through the 12th day of pregnancy, the embryonic loss of the mice was observed; a real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction was used to detect the messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) expressions of prolactin (PRL) and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 1 (IGFBP1) in the decidua of the mice. Additionally, the decidual tissues of patients with RSA and those of normal women in early pregnancy who required artificial abortion were collected and divided into an RSA group and a control group. Decidual stromal cells were isolated and cultured to compare cell proliferation between the two groups, and cellular migration and invasion were detected by membrane stromal cells. Western blotting was used to detect the protein expressions of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), cyclin D1, matrix metalloproteinase- (MMP) 2, and MMP-7 in stromal cells treated with LMWH. Results Compared with the RSA group, LMWH significantly reduced the pregnancy loss rate in the RSA mice (p < 0.05). Compared with the RSA group, the LMWH + RSA group had significantly higher expression levels of PRL and IGFBP1 mRNA (p < 0.01). LMWH promoted the proliferation, migration, and invasion of human decidual stromal cells; compared with the control group, the expression levels of MMP-2, MMP-7, cyclin D1, and PCNA proteins in the decidual stromal cells of the LMWH group increased (p < 0.05). Conclusions The use of LMWH can improve pregnancy outcomes by enhancing the proliferation and migration of stromal cells in early pregnancy and the decidualization of stromal cells.

Low-molecular-weight heparin is associated with lower venous thromboembolism events than factor Xa inhibitors in patients with severe blunt trauma: a cohort study from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a common complication of major trauma. Pharmacological VTE prophylactics are widely used, and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is recommended. Factor Xa inhibitors are increasingly being used for VTE prophylaxis in both medical and surgical patients. Evidence comparing LMWH and factor Xa inhibitors as VTE prophylactics for severe blunt trauma is lacking. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of factor Xa inhibitors and LMHW in VTE prophylaxis. Patients with severe blunt trauma who received LMWH or a factor Xa inhibitor for VTE prophylaxis in the Trauma Quality Improvement Program between 2017 and 2019 were included. The comparison was performed after using propensity score matching. The outcomes included mortality and incidence of DVT, PE, post-prophylactics haemorrhage control procedures and length of stay. After 2:1 propensity score matching, 1128 patients ( n =752, LMHW group; n =376, factor Xa inhibitor group) were included in the analysis. Patients in the LMWH group had fewer VTE events than those in the factor Xa inhibitor group (DVT, 3.7% vs. 7.2%, P =0.013; PE, 0.4% vs. 3.2%, P <0.001). VTE risk was higher in the factor Xa group (DVT: odds ratio, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.12-3.44; P =0.018 and PE: odds ratio, 9.65; 95% CI, 2.91-44.12; P =0.001). The mortality rate was higher in the LMWH group; however, there was no significant difference (4.0% vs. 1.9%; P =0.075). The difference in the risk of undergoing haemorrhage control surgery after VTE prophylaxis between both groups was insignificant (0.3% vs. 0.0%; P =0.333). LMWH was associated with a lower risk of VTE than factor Xa inhibitors in patients with severe blunt trauma. The mortality rate was higher in the LMWH group; however, there was no statistically significant difference observed.

Venous thromboembolism management in people with cystic fibrosis.

Rates of venous thromboembolism (VTE) are increasing in people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF). Providers treating VTE in PwCF have reported low confidence concerning anticoagulant drug selection, dose, duration, and drug-drug interactions. As there are currently no published reports regarding management of VTE in PwCF, our objective was to describe the management of VTE in PwCF. PwCF and VTE at the University of Utah Health were identified through electronic medical record searches. Patients were categorized into one of three treatment groups: warfarin, direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC), and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). The primary outcome was episodes of major bleeding. Secondary outcomes included clinically relevant nonmajor (CRNM) bleeding. Nine PwCF with a total of 12 unique VTE episodes were included in the study, with all but one episode associated with a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC). Of the 12 VTE cases, 25% were treated with warfarin, 50% with a DOAC, and 25% with LMWH. There were no episodes of major bleeding and only one episode of CRNM bleeding (Hemoptysis) in the LMWH group. All anticoagulant doses and durations generally followed guidelines for persons without CF. DOACs were the most common VTE treatment, at doses and duration consistent with guidelines for persons without CF, with no major or CRNM bleeding. VTE treatment in PwCF is generally consistent with guidelines for persons without CF with low rates of bleeding. DOACs are a potential option for treatment of VTE in PwCF, but more research is needed.

Platelet-Based Dose-Adjusted Low Molecular Weight Heparin Treatment Is Efficacious and Safe in Newly Diagnosed Acute Leukemia Patients with Catheter-Related Thrombosis

Introduction: Catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) is a major complication in patients with acute leukemia. Severe thrombocytopenia related to either the concomitant disease or therapy underscores the challenge of CRT management, resulting in the use of suboptimal anticoagulation, potentially leading to high rates of short-term complications, including recurrent thromboembolism and hemorrhage. Due to the paucity of data regarding the impact of reduced-dose anticoagulation on this clinical setting, the current study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of this treatment approach to CRT management in this challenging patient population. Methods: In this retrospective, case-control study, all adult (age ≥18 years) acute leukemia patients, who had arrived at the Rambam Health Care Campus (RHCC, Haifa, Israel) between 1.11.2004-30.6.2022 to receive anti-leukemia therapy via a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line were screened. The inclusion criteria were: patients with acute myeloid, promyelocytic and lymphoid leukemia (AML, APL, and ALL, respectively) and CRT confirmed by Doppler ultrasound within 3 months of leukemia diagnosis. Patients were divided into full- (i.e., 1 mg/kg bid) vs. partial-dose low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) groups. The LMWH dose was based on the platelet count with a cutoff of 50K/L, distinguishing between the selected doses. Primary endpoints: A record of venous thromboembolism (VTE; including pulmonary embolism (PE), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) recurrence within 12 months as well as a major hemorrhage (including intracranial, retinal and gastrointestinal hemorrhage) within 6 months. Secondary endpoints: blood product requirement (unit/day) before and after the CRT diagnosis (from leukemia diagnosis till CRT identification and 90 days or death (if prior) from the event, respectively) assessed in a self-controlled case series manner. Data were collected from the hospital electronic medical records. Chi-square and paired samples Wilcoxon tests were utilized for statistical analysis. Results: Overall,195 patients [aged 54±15 years; 103 (53%) males], diagnosed with CRT were included. The most frequent leukemia diagnosis was AML (n=149; 76%), with ALL and APL established in 23 (12%) patients each. CRT was diagnosed in the left upper limb in 136 (70%) patients, with 99 (46%) patients suffering from DVT. Eighty-eight (45%) patients were treated with full-dose LMWH. Recurrent VTE was identified in 11(12.5%) patients treated with full-dose LMWH vs. 9 (8.4%) receiving partial-dose LMWH (p-value 0.484), while major hemorrhage was diagnosed in 12 (13.6%) patients from the former group vs. 14 (13.0%) patients from the latter group (table 1). Similar results were documented upon stratification to deep vs. superficial CRT, and the leukemia type. The packed red blood cell (RBC) administration rate was lower in the post-CRT phase (0.12 units/day, IQR 0.06-0.20) compared to the pre-CRT phase (0.20 units/day, IQR 0-0.36; p-value &amp;lt;0.0001). Platelet utilization rates were similar in both the pre-CRT and post-CRT phases (0.05 units/day, IQR 0-0.24 and 0.06 units/day, IQR 0.01-0.16, respectively; p-value 0.126). Comparable results were observed in both full and partial-dose LMWH groups. Conclusion: LMWH dose adjustment based on platelet counts, in newly diagnosed acute leukemia patients with CRT, is not associated with higher rates of VTE recurrence. Moreover, this strategy does not result in major hemorrhagic complications even in patients with severe thrombocytopenia. Notably, RBC infusion requirements were lower in the post-CRT diagnosis phase, while platelet transfusion was similar during the pre- and post-CRT phases. This analysis, including a large number of patients, demonstrates that the adjusted therapy is safe and efficient in this challenging clinical scenario.

Abstract 14480: Safety and Efficacy of Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs Low Molecular Weight Heparin for Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Cancer

Introduction: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been studied for treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with cancer. However, the trials have shown conflicting results when compared with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Therefore, we aimed to conduct an updated meta-analysis of the available studies. Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing DOAC vs LMWH for VTE treatment in cancer patients were searched from multiple online databases. The primary endpoints of interest were recurrent VTE, major bleeding, clinically relevant non major bleeding (CRNB) and mortality at the longest available follow up. A random-effects model was used to estimate risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Six RCTs, with a total of 3,703 patients - 1,855 in the DOAC group and 1,848 in the LMWH group were included. Around 49% of patients were men and the mean age was 66 years. The follow up duration varied from 3 to 24 months. Patients treated with DOAC, when compared with the LMWH group, had lower risk of recurrent VTE (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.52-0.83, p = 0.0005) (Figure 1), but a higher risk of CRNB (RR 1.63, 95% CI 1.19-2.23, p = 0.002). No significant differences were found between the two groups with regards to major bleeding (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.82-1.71, p = 0.36) (Figure 2) or overall mortality (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.90-1.14, p = 0.78). Conclusions: For treatment of VTE, DOACs as compared with LMWH are associated with significant reduction of recurrent VTE events but with a higher risk of CRNB.

Heparin for Women With Recurrent Miscarriage and Inherited Thrombophilia (ALIFE2): An International Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial

ABSTRACT Thrombophilia has been implicated in the cause of recurrent miscarriage, which affects approximately 3% of couples trying to conceive. International professional guidelines recommend heparin anticoagulation for antiphospholipid syndrome, an acquired thrombophilia responsible for approximately 15% of recurrent miscarriage, but not for other inherited thrombophilias due to an absence of evidence. Many clinicians prescribe heparin to women with recurrent miscarriage and inherited thrombophilia despite the professional recommendations. This international, open-label, randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the effect of low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and standard pregnancy surveillance on livebirth rates in women with recurrent miscarriage and inherited thrombophilia. Women aged 18–42 years with recurrent miscarriages who were attempting to conceive or less than 7 weeks pregnant and had an inherited thrombophilia were recruited across 40 hospitals in 5 countries. Women were randomly assigned to LMWH or no LMWH in a 1:1 ratio. Women randomized to LMWH self-administered it once a day subcutaneously, beginning as soon as possible after a positive pregnancy test and before 7 weeks of gestation and continuing throughout pregnancy. The primary study outcome was livebirth after 24 weeks of gestation. Livebirth was compared across randomized treatment groups using an χ2 test with continuity correction, then a sensitivity analysis with logistic regression to adjust for stratification factors. A total of 326 women were randomized between August 2012 and January 2021. Of these, 164 were randomized to LMWH plus standard care and 162 to standard care alone. In the standard care group, 30 patients ultimately received LMWH for thromboprophylaxis per professional treatment guidelines. The mean age of participants was 33 years, and the median number of miscarriages before randomization was 3 (interquartile range, 2–4), with two thirds of patients having a history of 3 or more miscarriages. The most common thrombophilia diagnoses were heterozygosity for factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A mutation, and protein S deficiency. The livebirth rate was 72% (116/162) in the LMWH group, and 71% (112/158) in the standard care group, and no statistical significant was detected between the groups even after adjustment (odds ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.65–1.78; P = 0.77). No differences in adverse pregnancy outcomes or complications were observed between the groups. Easy bruising was reported by 45% (73) women in the LMWH group and 10% (16) in the standard care group. This randomized controlled trial demonstrates that although LMWH is safe in women with recurrent pregnancy loss and inherited thrombophilia, it does not result in an increased live birth rate compared with standard pregnancy surveillance.

Heparin regimes in head and neck cancer flap surgery: A retrospective cohort study of free flap complications graded by Clavien-Dindo

The purpose of the current study was to compare two different antithrombotic protocols for free flap reconstruction in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients. Postoperative complications were graded using the Clavien–Dindo (CD) classification and compared between the two groups: the low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) group (n = 57) and the unfractionated heparin (UFH) group (n = 59). Patients with HNSCC from January 2010 to January 2022 were included. A total of 116 patients with a mean age of 60.46 years (range 43–83 years) were included in this study. In all, 81 were male (69.8%), and 35 were female (30.2%). Most patients (48.3%) had only grade 1 or 2 complications. CD grades (1–5) were similar between the two groups. Flap loss occurred in 2 patients (1.7%) in the LMWH group (p = 239). Prognostic factors of flap loss were high BMI, hypertension, high T stage, and high N stage. No differences were found between the groups in regard to age, sex, operating times, flap source, recipient vessels and overall complications. The results of this study demonstrate that UFH was as safe and effective as LMWH regarding postoperative complications. Free flap surgery is safe and effective for head and neck reconstruction.

Caprini risk assessment model combined with D-dimer to predict the occurrence of deep vein thrombosis and guide intervention after laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer

BackgroundTo explore the diagnostic value of Caprini risk assessment model (2005) combined with D-dimer for deep vein thrombosis, and to exclude patients with low incidence of thrombosis who might not need anticoagulation after surgery.MethodsA total of 171 colorectal cancer patients who underwent surgery from January 2022 to August 2022 were enrolled in this study. Caprini risk assessment model was used to evaluate patients the day before surgery, and full-length venous ultrasonography of lower extremity was used to assess whether patients had thrombosis one day before surgery and the sixth day after surgery. The value of D-dimer was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays on the first day after surgery, and clinical data of patients were collected during hospitalization.ResultsA total of 171 patients were divided into IPC Group and IPC + LMWH Group according to whether low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) were used to prevent thrombus after surgery. Eventually, 17.6% (15/85) patients in IPC Group and 7% (6/86) patients in IPC + LMWH Group developed DVT. Through separate analysis of IPC Group, it is found that Caprini score and D-dimer were independent risk factors for DVT (Caprini OR 3.39 [95% CI 1.38–8.32]; P = 0.008, D-Dimer OR 6.142 [95% CI 1.209–31.187]; P = 0.029). The area under ROC curve of Caprini risk assessment model is 0.792 (95% CI 0.69–0.945, P < 0.01), the cut-off value is 9.5, and the area under ROC curve of D-dimer is 0.738 (95%CI 0.555–0.921, P < 0.01), the cut-off value is 0.835 μg/mL, and the area under the ROC curve was 0.865 (95% CI 0.754–0.976, P < 0.01) when both of them were combined. Based on decision curve analysis, it is found that Caprini risk assessment model combined with D-dimer can benefit patients more. All patients are divided into four groups. When Caprini score < 10 and D-dimer < 0.835 μg/mL, only 1.23% (1/81) of patients have thrombosis and LMWH has little significance. When Caprini score > 10 and D-dimer > 0.835 μg/mL, the incidence of DVT is 38.7% (12/31) and LMWH should be considered.ConclusionsThe Caprini risk assessment model and D-dimer can provide more accurate risk stratification for patients after laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer.

661 Evaluating the Efficacy of Post-Operative VTE Prophylaxis in Fragility Hip Fractures: DOAC vs LMWH

Abstract Aim Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are licensed for use as venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in elective hip surgery however low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is the mainstay for VTE prophylaxis in hip surgery following fragility fractures. Due to social distancing regulations during the COVID pandemic in 2021, it became increasingly difficult for community nurses to administer LMWH injections post-operatively whilst DOACs offered a less invasive alternative. This study aims to evaluate efficacy of DOACs in comparison to LMWH as VTE prophylaxis following hip surgery in fragility fractures. Method Retrospective, population-based cohort study of patients discharged on VTE prophylaxis with LMWH and DOAC in 2019 and 2021 respectively following fragility hip fracture. Data was obtained through National Hip Fracture Database and electronic medical records. Data collected included patient demographics, comorbidities, current medications, time to surgery, level of independence pre- and post-discharge and length of stay. Main outcomes assessed were incidence of VTE within 6 months. Results A total of 200 randomly selected patients were included. Following discharge, incidence of VTE was 1% in the LMWH group (n = 100) and 1% in the DOAC group (n = 100). All patients received LMWH and TED anti-embolism stockings as an inpatient. Average length of time on DOAC following discharge was 3.5 weeks. Conclusions The study shows non-inferiority of DOACs in VTE prophylaxis post-operatively when compared to LMWH. It supports a case for their use in post-operative management of fragility hip fractures. Further data surrounding compliance to DOAC following discharge will allow accurate evaluation of its efficacy.

Aspirin versus LMWH for VTE prophylaxis after orthopedic surgery.

Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is often used to prevent perioperative venous thrombosis after surgery, but aspirin is also recommended by academics. Studies were searched in electronic databases until February 24, 2023. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of aspirin and LMWH for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in patients after orthopedic surgery. The outcomes were death from any causes, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), etc. This study was registered with INPLASY, number 202320117. Six randomized controlled trials enrolled 13,851 patients with postoperative joint surgery. The risk of DVT was comparable between the two groups when aspirin was combined with mechanical devices (RR 0.61 [95% CI 0.27-1.39], I² = 62%, P = 0.24). No significant differences in all cause death, PE, wound infection, and wound complication were found between the aspirin and LMWH groups. In this meta-analysis, the mortality rate was comparable between the aspirin and LMWH groups. However, aspirin alone had a higher risk of DVT than LMWH. Based on the results of this meta-analysis, we suggest aspirin combined with mechanical devices for VTE prophylaxis in patients after orthopedic surgery.

Comparative Efficacy of Oral Apixaban and Subcutaneous Low Molecular Weight Heparins in the Treatment of Cancer-Associated Thromboembolism: A Meta-Analysis.

Cancer patients' risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE) is four to seven times higher than the general population. Cancer-associated VTE (CA-VTE), is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients. Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) has historically been the mainstay treatment ofCA-VTE; however, complications such as bleeding and recurrent VTE make it challenging to manage these patients. Recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have proven that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are as efficacious as LMWHs in treating CA-VTE. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to ascertain the efficacy and safety of LMWH and Apixaban for the treatment of CA-VTE.A systematic review was conducted using Medline, Embase, and Scopus, databases for all cohort studies, case-control studies, and RCTs in English comparing cancer patients undergoing treatment with Apixaban or LMWH to treat CA-VTE from inception-May 2023. The Review Manager program, version 5.4.1, was used for statistical analysis and the Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effects models to calculate the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and the inverse variance approach to get the weighted mean difference for the continuous outcomes. Q-test for heterogeneity was used to examine statistical heterogeneity and an I2 statistics value >50%was defined as significant heterogeneity. A total of four studies were included, and the total number of patients was 1,632 across all studies. The Apixaban group was associated with a statistically significant increase in minor bleeding (RR 1.57; 95% CI (1.12, 2.21); p=0.009; I2=0%), but not for major and total bleeding. The Apixaban group showed a statistically significant lower risk of recurrent VTE when compared to the LMWH group (RR: 0.61; 95% CI (0.41, 0.92); p=0.02; I2 = 7%), and there was no statistically significant difference in terms of mortality between the two groups (RR: 0.89;95% CI (0.73, 1.09); I2=0). Our findings suggest that Apixaban may be a favorable anticoagulant option for managing cancer-associated thromboembolism, as it demonstrated a lower risk of recurrent VTE. The risk of bleeding with DOAC in gastrointestinal cancers warrants further investigation.

Determinants of Late Venous Thromboembolic Events After Acute Isolated Superficial Vein Thrombosis in Daily Practice: 12 Month Results of the INSIGHTS-SVT Study

Long term incidence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) and bleeding events in patients with superficial vein thrombosis (SVT) was investigated. In this prospective, observational study, patients with acute SVT were treated at the discretion of the responsible physician. The primary efficacy outcome was symptomatic VTE including deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and recurrent or extending SVT. The primary safety outcome was clinically relevant bleeding, recorded at periodic clinic visits over a 12 month period. The mean age of 872 patients with 12 month follow up was 60.6 ± 14.5 years, 64.5% were female, 80.1% had chronic venous disease (defined as chronic venous insufficiency and or varicose veins), and 41.9% had a history of VTE. They were receiving fondaparinux in 62.1% (mean duration 34.9 ± 15.7 days), low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in 25.0% (mean duration 26.2 ± 23.2 days), any other anticoagulants in 6.2%, and no anticoagulant in 6.7%. At 12 months, 108 patients (14.3%) achieved the primary efficacy outcome. The most common VTE event was recurrent or extending SVT in 11.0%, followed by symptomatic DVT in 2.7%, symptomatic PE in 2.4%, hospitalisation due to VTE in 1.8%, and death in 1.1%. Clinically relevant bleeding events occurred in 2.1% of patients, and major bleedings in 0.3%. By drug, the rate of the primary efficacy outcome was highest in the LMWH group (22.4%) and lowest in the fondaparinux group (10.4%). In a multivariable model, patients with events between three months and 12 months were significantly more likely to have higher BMI (hazard ratio [HR] 1.06; p= .002), history of VTE (HR 2.89; p= .002), and severe systemic infections (HR 7.59; p= .006). The risk of symptomatic VTE remained elevated over 12 months of follow up. Therefore, anticoagulation beyond 45 days may be considered in patients with risk factors. [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02699151.].

Factors affecting continuous renal replacement therapy duration in critically ill patients: A retrospective study.

This study aimed to analyze the factors affecting continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) duration in critically ill patients and provide a reference for clinical treatment. We divided patients into regional citrate anti-coagulation (RCA) and low-molecular-weight-heparin (LMWH) groups according to the anti-coagulation method and collected the relevant data, to analyze the factors associated with CRRT time. Compared with the LMWH group, the RCA group had a longer mean treatment time (55.36 ± 22.57 vs. 37.65 ± 27.09 h, p < 0.001), lower transmembrane pressure, and lower filter pressure, regardless of vascular access site. Multivariable linear regression analysis showed a significant correlation between anti-coagulation patterns, filter pressure at CRRT discontinuation, nurses' level of intensive care unit experience, pre-machine fibrinogen level, and CRRT time. Anti-coagulation is the most important factor affecting CRRT duration. Filter pressure, nurses' level of intensive care unit experience, and fibrinogen level also affecting CRRT duration.

Low-molecular-weight heparin therapy reduces 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis-3 by improving inflammation and coagulopathy.

Sepsis is a syndromic response to infection and is associated with high mortality, thus imposing a significant global burden of disease. Although low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) has been recommended to prevent venous thromboembolism, its anticoagulant and anti-inflammatory effects in sepsis remain controversial. Owing to the modification of the Sepsis-3 definition and diagnostic criteria, further evaluation of the efficacy and benefit population of LMWH is required. We performed a retrospective cohort study to assess whether LMWH improved the inflammation, coagulopathy, and clinical outcomes against Sepsis-3 and to identify the target patients. All patients diagnosed with sepsis at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University (the largest general hospital in northwest China) from January 2016 to December 2020 were recruited and re-evaluated using Sepsis-3 criteria. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 88 pairs of patients were categorized into the treatment and control groups based on subcutaneous LMWH administration. Compared with the control group, a significantly lower 28-day mortality was observed in the LMWH group (26.1 vs. 42.0%, p = 0.026) with a comparable incidence of major bleeding events (6.8 vs. 8.0%, p = 0.773). Cox regression analysis showed that LMWH administration was the independent protective factor for septic patients (aHR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.29-0.81; p = 0.006). Correspondingly, the LMWH treatment group showed a significant improvement in inflammation and coagulopathy. Further subgroup analysis showed that LMWH therapy was associated with favorable outcomes in patients younger than 60 years and diagnosed with sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC), ISTH overt DIC, non-septic shock, or non-diabetics and in patients included in the moderate-risk group (APACHE II score 20-35 or SOFA score 8-12). Our study results showed that LMWH improves 28-day mortality by improving inflammatory response and coagulopathy in patients meeting Sepsis-3 criteria. The SIC and ISTH overt DIC scoring systems can better identify septic patients who are likely to benefit more from LMWH administration.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin and Recurrent VTE in Patients With Cancer

In patients with cancer who have venous thromboembolism (VTE) events, long-term anticoagulation with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is recommended to prevent recurrent VTE. The effectiveness of a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) compared with LMWH for preventing recurrent VTE in patients with cancer is uncertain. To evaluate DOACs, compared with LMWH, for preventing recurrent VTE and for rates of bleeding in patients with cancer following an initial VTE event. Unblinded, comparative effectiveness, noninferiority randomized clinical trial conducted at 67 oncology practices in the US that enrolled 671 patients with cancer (any invasive solid tumor, lymphoma, multiple myeloma, or chronic lymphocytic leukemia) who had a new clinical or radiological diagnosis of VTE. Enrollment occurred from December 2016 to April 2020. Final follow-up was in November 2020. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either a DOAC (n = 335) or LMWH (n = 336) and were followed up for 6 months or until death. Physicians and patients selected any DOAC or any LMWH (or fondaparinux) and physicians selected drug doses. The primary outcome was the recurrent VTE rate at 6 months. Noninferiority of anticoagulation with a DOAC vs LMWH was defined by the upper limit of the 1-sided 95% CI for the difference of a DOAC relative to LMWH of less than 3% in the randomized cohort that received at least 1 dose of assigned treatment. The 6 prespecified secondary outcomes included major bleeding, which was assessed using a 2.5% noninferiority margin. Between December 2016 and April 2020, 671 participants were randomized and 638 (95%) completed the trial (median age, 64 years; 353 women [55%]). Among those randomized to a DOAC, 330 received at least 1 dose. Among those randomized to LMWH, 308 received at least 1 dose. Rates of recurrent VTE were 6.1% in the DOAC group and 8.8% in the LMWH group (difference, -2.7%; 1-sided 95% CI, -100% to 0.7%) consistent with the prespecified noninferiority criterion. Of 6 prespecified secondary outcomes, none were statistically significant. Major bleeding occurred in 5.2% of participants in the DOAC group and 5.6% in the LMWH group (difference, -0.4%; 1-sided 95% CI, -100% to 2.5%) and did not meet the noninferiority criterion. Severe adverse events occurred in 33.8% of participants in the DOAC group and 35.1% in the LMWH group. The most common serious adverse events were anemia and death. Among adults with cancer and VTE, DOACs were noninferior to LMWH for preventing recurrent VTE over 6-month follow-up. These findings support use of a DOAC to prevent recurrent VTE in patients with cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02744092.