Low Institutional Ownership Research Articles

MD&A tone and stock returns

This paper examines the impact of the MD&A (Management’s Discussion and Analysis) tone on cross-sectional stock returns in the unique context of Chinese A-share companies. We find a significant and positive relationship between the MD&A tone and Chinese stock returns after controlling for quantitative financial metrics. Our results suggest that the MD&A tone provides additional value that further enhances the information quality in MD&A disclosures and market responses. Furthermore, we observe that the textual tone effect is more pronounced for firms with lower institutional ownership, lower financial transparency, in less competitive market environments, and both the information factor and the sentiment factor of MD&A tone positively affect stock returns. Thus, we provide convincing evidence that MD&A narratives can serve as an effective communication tool to facilitate disclosure and mitigate information asymmetry between corporations and investors.

The Effect of Sustainability Reports on FirmValue with Institutional Ownership as a Moderating Variable

Purpose: This research wants to enrich research that studies the effect of sustainability reporting on company performance, which is still inconsistent. In addition, this study considers the supervisory mechanism factor in the form of institutional ownership to determine whether the effect of sustainability reporting on company performance is different in companies with high institutional ownership and companies with low institutional ownership. Method: The study utilized purposive sampling to select companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) that consistently published both sustainability and financial reports from 2017 to 2020, resulting in a sample of 39 companies. For hypothesis testing, the research employed the STATA 17 software, followed by methods such as descriptive analysis, panel data regression analysis, determination of coefficients, and tests for both simultaneous and partial significance. Result: Sustainability reporting positively influences firm value. This study found that institutional ownership moderates the effect of sustainability reporting on firm value. Future research should focus on examining companies within similar sectors to yield more reliable results concerning how sustainability reports affect firm value, considering the specific characteristics of companies across different industry.

Shared analyst coverage, 52-week high, and cross-firm return predictability

In this study, we show that the return predictability of analyst-connected firms is positively correlated with nearness to 52-week high stock prices. Our results are robust to tax loss selling and penny stocks and when controlling for market factors and macroeconomic conditions. The impact of the 52-week high on the analyst-connected momentum effect is stronger among focal stocks of smaller firms, those with lower institutional ownership, and those with less analyst coverage. Moreover, the greater the number of shared analysts, the stronger the relationship between firm fundamentals, resulting in stronger return predictability. When both focal and analyst-connected firms have stock prices near (far from) their 52-week highs, there is a stronger underreaction to good (bad) news about analyst-connected firms.

The effect of academic top executives on corporate social responsibility: potential motivation and its outcomes

This paper investigates whether there is ethical or opportunistic motivation behind academic top executives’ (ATEs) engagement in corporate social responsibility (CSR) by exploring how ATEs relate to CSR practices and their consequences on corporate misbehavior and performance. We find that firms run by ATEs invest more in CSR. Moreover, CSR firms with ATEs are unlikely to be involved in corporate fraud and aggressive tax avoidance, especially when firms have low institutional ownership and fewer analysts and are located in low law enforcement and socially dishonest environments. We also document that the CSR performance brought by ATEs is positively associated with subsequent firm performance. Overall, our study suggests that academic experience has important implications for understanding executives’ ethical leadership and driving firms’ ethical CSR.

Does religious atmosphere affect enterprise digital transformation? Evidence from China

This study examines whether and how religious atmosphere affects enterprise digital transformation. We find religious atmosphere is significantly negatively associated with digital transformation. We also find religion inhibits digital transformation through strengthening risk aversion and weakening innovation consciousness. Additional results show that the effect of religion on enterprise digital transformation is significant primarily in firms with fewer senior executives affiliated with the CPC and managers who possess less conservative personalities. The inhibiting effect is more pronounced for non-state-owned firms and firms with lower institutional ownership. Moreover, the significant effect only exists in areas with lower market competition and weaker government intervention. Moreover, indigenous religious tradition attenuates the positive impact of digital transformation on firm productivity. Overall, our findings provide insights for understanding the role of religion, as an informal institution, in firms’ decision-making in emerging markets.

Strategic Deviation and Corporate Tax Avoidance: A Risk Management Perspective

We examine the association between strategic deviation—defined as the deviation of firms’ resource allocation from that of industry peers—and corporate tax avoidance. By combining the agency perspective with the risk aspect, we argue that managers of firms with high strategic deviation avoid tax compared with those of firms with low strategic deviation. High-strategic-deviant firms who avoid tax are likely to face the risk of compromising firm value. Based on a large sample of 40,168 US firm-year observations for the period 1987–2020, we find evidence supporting our hypothesis. A series of robustness tests validates our main finding. We further provide evidence to suggest that the positive association between strategic deviation and tax avoidance is stronger for deviant firms with high financial constraints, low institutional ownership, firms operating in more competitive markets, and procuring higher auditor provided tax services from incumbent auditors. Importantly, we show that the capital market penalises tax avoidance strategies undertaken by the deviant firms.

Does corporate governance matter in competitive industries? Evidence from brokerage mergers and closures

AbstractWe document that firms in competitive industries experience significantly more deterioration in financial reporting quality after a reduction in analyst coverage due to brokerage closures or mergers, as compared to firms in noncompetitive industries. Most of the effects are mainly driven by firms with smaller initial analyst coverage, lower institutional ownership and greater financial constraints. Importantly, we further show that after brokerage exits, managerial slack increases more for firms in noncompetitive than competitive industries. Consistent with the notion that agency manifestation can take different forms, we provide evidence that competition may curtail some agency issues, such as managerial slack, while also exacerbating other agency issues, such as financial misreporting.

Credit default swaps and corporate ESG performance

This study finds that credit default swap (CDS) trading positively affects a firm's environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance. This effect is more prominent in ESG strengths than ESG concerns. The proposed empirical connection remains valid across endogeneity-controlling methodologies, model specifications, and ESG performance measures. The effect is stronger for firms with stronger bank relationships, higher debt dependence, and more restrictive covenants. Furthermore, improvement in ESG performance is more pronounced for firms with more free cash flow, lower institutional ownership, and higher financial constraints. Our findings reveal the real effects of CDS trading on firm ESG performance.

Managerial flexibility, capacity investment, and inventory levels

We study the effect of managerial time horizon on two key operations decisions: inventory levels and capacity investment. For identification, we exploit a quasi‐natural experiment provided by the staggered adoption of constituency statutes, which alleviate managerial short‐termism by providing legal protection to executives adopting a long‐term approach in their corporate decisions. Using a staggered difference‐in‐differences design, we find that, after the reforms, firms incorporated in constituency states (treated firms) increased inventory and capacity investment by 5.2% and 15.4%, respectively, relative to firms not incorporated in constituency states (control firms). We also find that these increases are gradual and persist over time, suggesting that they are structural in nature. We further show that the effect of constituency statutes on inventory levels and capacity investment are stronger for firms with ex ante higher level of managerial short‐termism, such as firms with low institutional ownership. Performance also increases relatively more for affected firms with higher ex ante managerial short‐termism. Our results pass a battery of robustness and validity tests. Interestingly, while constituency statutes are intended to protect executives from short‐term oriented shareholder sanctions, our findings suggest that these statutes ultimately benefited not only executives, but also potentially the long‐term interest of shareholders. Even in the absence of regulation, executives facing short‐term pressure could intensify communication efforts with shareholders on how specific operational decisions and investments would be beneficial to the company. Notably, executives could use various media channels to help shape retail investors’ attitude toward operational investments that may create future value.

Firm-level political risk and intellectual capital investment: Does managerial ability matter?

This paper examines the impacts of firm-level political risks on intellectual capital investment decisions and how managerial ability adjusts this relationship. Using a broad sample of U.S firms from 2002 to 2021, our results show that firms with higher political risks reduce their investment in intellectual capital. This impact is more prominent for high-tech firms and firms with high financial distress, external financial dependence, and lower institutional ownership. Further, we find supportive evidence that managerial ability can prevent a substantial dimension (around 20%–40%) of the destructive impact of political risk on intellectual capital investment, which is also driven by firm-specific characteristics. These findings hold after a battery of robustness tests.

The informational role of analyst coverage on firm innovation: evidence from China

ABSTRACT We examine the effect of financial analysts’ informational and monitoring roles on firm innovation in the developing Chinese market. The findings demonstrate that analyst coverage has a positive influence on the number of corporate patent and invention applications. Causality is established by using an instrumental variable, and is reinforced by implementing a regression-discontinuity design (RDD) based on index reconstitutions and a difference-in-difference (DiD) analysis using the Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect program as a plausible exogenous shock. Further, the positive effects are more pronounced for firms with severer financial constraints, higher information asymmetry, lower tolerance for failure among investors, and lower institutional ownership. These findings indicate that the informational role of financial analysts is more salient than their monitoring role in the context of developing markets.

Using REIT Follow-on Equity Offerings to Pay down Credit Line Balances: Bank Certification or Monitored Financial Flexibility?

Using hand collected data from offering prospectuses and other corporate filings, we examine the market response to real estate investment trust (REIT) follow-on stock offerings’ stated uses of proceeds. We also track REIT banking relationships over time. Consistent with the idea of bank certification, we show that markets react relatively favorably to REIT equity offers where issuers have lending relationships with affiliates of the underwriters. However, we also find that reactions are most favorable where REIT issuers intend to repay their bank’s line of credit, regardless of the bank’s affiliation with the underwriters. This pattern is particularly strong among smaller firms with lower institutional ownership. We posit that credit line repayments preserve benefits of bank monitoring while enhancing financial flexibility. Further examination reveals that this monitored financial flexibility is the dominant effect.

Corporate sustainability policies and corporate investment efficiency: Evidence from the quasi-natural experiment in China

This paper studies the impact of green disclosure on firm investment efficiency, leveraging a policy experiment in China. Since 2012, the Chinese government has begun to implement the Ambient Air Quality Standards (AQS), which have strengthened the requirements for green disclosure throughout the country. We exploit the rollout of the AQS and find that tightening the green disclosure requirements significantly increases corporate investment efficiency. This increase is primarily driven by a reduction in underinvestment among non-state-owned firms and firms with low institutional ownership. Further analysis suggests that the alleviation of agency problems and the reduction of financial constraints are the two main mechanisms through which green disclosure influences firm investment efficiency. Our findings provide valuable policy implications, indicating that strengthening green disclosure standards can have a substantial positive impact on firm investment outcomes.

Is your surname remunerative? Surname favorability and CEO compensation

We find that CEOs with more favorable surnames receive significantly higher compensation. The estimated effect of surname favorability is unique and incremental to the documented effects of various firm, board, and CEO characteristics. CEOs with French or German surnames receive significantly lower compensation after the French and German governments' opposition to the Iraq war. Surname favorability is not associated with corporate investments, disclosure policies, or firm performances. The results are more pronounced for professional (i.e., non-founder) or short-tenured CEOs and for firms with lower institutional ownership. Surname favorability reduces the likelihood of forced CEO turnover following poor stock performance but is not associated with a CEO's self-serving behaviors. Our results suggest that the effect of surname favorability is attributable to inefficient contracting by the board of directors. Our findings have implications for corporate stakeholders who have committed to the efficient contracting of CEO compensations.

Is corporate environmental investment a strategic risk management tool? Evidence from short selling threats

This study examines whether corporate environmental investment is employed as a strategic management tool in response to short-selling threats. Using a difference-in-differences approach, we find that corporate environmental investment increases in response to short-selling threats in threatened firms. The impact is more pronounced for firms with greater financial opacity and lower institutional ownership, which is consistent with the risk management hypothesis. Furthermore, we document that companies tend to increase their environmental disclosure in complement to the increase in environmental investment. We also find significant increases in environmental voluntary over regulatory investment after the firms have been added to the short-selling list. Additional analysis suggests that environmental investment reduces overinvestment and investment inefficiency, and it is negatively associated with stock price crash risk.

Dissecting the idiosyncratic volatility puzzle: A fundamental analysis approach

This paper argues fundamental information help resolve information uncertainty that leads to high idiosyncratic volatility premium. The IVOL-return relation is negative for stocks with poor fundamental strength but positive for stocks with strong fundamental strength. The arrival of fundamental news weakens the negative IVOL effect. Our findings are robust for alternative model specifications. Moreover, the negative IVOL effect dominates the positive IVOL effect due to arbitrage asymmetry that buying is easier than short selling stocks. Consistent with arbitrage asymmetry, the negative IVOL effect is stronger for stocks with low institutional ownership and following high investor sentiment. Overall, we provide a simple fundamental-based explanation for idiosyncratic volatility puzzle.

Mandatory Disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility and the Quality of Earnings Management

Using the exogenous shock caused by the mandatory corporate social responsibility (CSR) information disclosure policy in 2008, this paper examines the impact of mandatory CSR information disclosure on the earnings management activities of listed firms in China from the perspective of external corporate regulation based on the Difference-in-Differences (DID) method. The results show that mandatory CSR information disclosure can significantly improve the quality of firms’ earnings management. The mechanism analysis shows that the policy’s enhancement of the effectiveness of external regulation by regulators and the media played an important role in curbing firms’ earnings management activities. The heterogeneity analysis shows that the inhibitory effect of mandatory CSR disclosure policy on firms’ earnings management activities is better in firms with lower analyst coverage and lower institutional ownership. The study further extends the mechanism of the impact of mandatory CSR disclosure on firms’ earnings management activities, and provides practical guidance on how to improve the quality of firms’ earnings management and enhance the efficiency of corporate governance.

The Simultaneous Effect Dividend Policy and Debt Policy

This study aims to examine dividend policies for companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the 2018-2022 period. Agency theory argues that dividend policy can reduce agency costs and reduce agency conflicts. The percentage of institutional ownership is used as a proxy for agency costs and can be used as a mechanism for lowering agency conflict. The total sample is 44 companies listed on the IDX. The estimation uses the pooling data method and 3SLS. This research develops a simultaneous system econometric model. This study argues that high institutional ownership leads to higher agency conflict, as management and institutions collaborate to prioritize their interests over other shareholders. Conversely, low institutional ownership leads to disputes between management, low institutional, and public shareholders. The entrenchment argument predicts higher conflict in high institutional ownership, while the convergence argument predicts common agency conflict in common institutional ownership.

Local Newspaper Layoffs and Workplace Safety*

AbstractWe investigate the role of the local media in curtailing undesirable behaviors of local corporations. We examine the effects of local newspaper layoffs on the workplace safety levels of local firms, finding that firms' total case rates of workplace injuries increase following newspaper layoffs. We also show the mechanisms of reductions in safety‐related expenditures and increased workloads. Cross‐sectional tests find that the monitoring role of these newspapers is more important for firms with weaker labor unions or lower institutional ownership. Overall, our results suggest that local newspapers serve as key corporate monitors and essential information intermediaries, mitigating firms' undesirable behavior.

Corporate digital transformation and financialization: Evidence from Chinese listed firms

We examine the relationship between digital transformation and corporate financialization using Chinese-listed firms from 2007 to 2021. Results show that digital transformation facilitates corporate financialization, and this positive relationship is pronounced among firms with high agency costs and low institutional ownership. We find that the profit-chasing motive for financialization is the predominant driving force. To verify the motivation, we find that risk-taking behaviors and the yield spreads between financial and tangible assets increase along with the digital transformation. To avoid excessive financialization, corporate managers and regulatory agencies should strengthen their corporate governance under digital transformation.