Low-income Uninsured Adults Research Articles

A feasibility study assessing knowledge, vaccine hesitancy, and completion rates of free HPV vaccination in low-income uninsured adults.

Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination rates remain low in the U.S., particularly among minorities and low-income, uninsured patients. We report preliminary data on a pilot study program providing education and free HPV vaccination at a clinic serving low-income uninsured adults. From October 2020 through October 2022, we assessed HPV vaccination knowledge, awareness, and prevalence of hesitancy towards receiving the vaccine among low-income uninsured patients age 18-45. The Parents Attitudes about Childhood Vaccines (PACV) survey was modified and used to evaluate vaccine hesitancy. An educational video on HPV was shown to patients declining vaccination. 43 patients were enrolled. 69.8% had heard of the HPV vaccine and 85.7% were non-hesitant based on PACV scores of 0-49. Black participants had a statistically significant higher PACV score (more hesitant) than White participants. Familiarity with the HPV vaccine correlated with lower PACV scores. Only 27% completed all three HPV vaccine doses. The availability of an education program together with free HPV vaccination are not sufficient to achieve adequate vaccination rates in low-income, uninsured adults. Innovative, culturally sensitive education and supportive interventions, in addition to access to free HPV vaccination, are warranted in order to improve vaccination rates in this underserved population.

Out of the Woodwork: Enrollment Spillovers in the Oregon Health Insurance Experiment.

We analyze the impact of expanded adult Medicaid eligibility on the enrollment of already-eligible children. We analyze the 2008 Oregon Medicaid lottery, in which some low-income uninsured adults were randomly selected to be allowed to apply for Medicaid. Children in these households were eligible for Medicaid irrespective of the lottery outcome. We estimate statistically significant but transitory impacts of adult lottery selection on child Medicaid enrollment: at three months after the lottery, for every 9 adults who enrolled in Medicaid due to winning the lottery, one additional child also enrolled. Our results shed light on the existence, magnitude, and nature of so-called "woodwork effects".

Impact of cash incentives for low-income individuals to seek a primary care visit on mental health outcomes: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial.

We explore whether a cash incentive to see a primary care provider (PCP) improves self-reported depression, anxiety, and pain among low-income patients in a randomized trial. Secondary outcomes of a randomized controlled trial, enrolling low-income uninsured adults to receive cash incentives ($0, $25, $50) to see a PCP. Interview data was collected at enrollment and 12 months later. Health outcomes were measured with the PROMIS depression, anxiety, and pain interference scales. We estimated adjusted logistic regressions to determine whether self-reported improvements occurred in depression, anxiety, or pain. 981 subjects completed surveys 12 months following study enrollment (80% retention). Subjects who were incentivized were 5.7 percentage points more likely to see a PCP in the initial six months (p<0.05). Incentivized subjects were 6 percentage points more likely to experience an improvement in depression and pain at 12 months. Among those who reported high levels of depression and pain at baseline, they were 10.6 and 8 percentage points, respectively, to experience an improvement relative to those who were not incentivized. Meaningful improvements were observed for depression and pain PROMIS domains for subjects randomized to the incentive groups, presumably through their interaction with a PCP and the health care system. This finding was robust for the full sample and a group that reported more severe symptoms at baseline.

Out of the Woodwork: Enrollment Spillovers in the Oregon Health Insurance Experiment

We analyze the impact of expanded adult Medicaid eligibility on the Medicaid enrollment of already-eligible children. To do so, we exploit the 2008 Oregon Medicaid lottery, in which some low-income uninsured adults were randomly selected for the chance to apply for Medicaid. Children in these households were eligible for Medicaid irrespective of whether the household won the lottery. We estimate statistically significant but transitory impacts of adult lottery selection on children’s Medicaid enrollment: for every 9 adults who enroll in Medicaid due to the lottery, one additional child also enrolls at the same time. Our results shed light on the existence, magnitude, and nature of so-called “woodwork effects.

The Value of Medicaid: Interpreting Results from the Oregon Health Insurance Experiment.

We develop a set of frameworks for welfare analysis of Medicaid and apply them to the Oregon Health Insurance Experiment, a Medicaid expansion for low-income, uninsured adults that occurred via random assignment. Across different approaches, we estimate recipient willingness to pay for Medicaid between $0.5 and $1.2 per dollar of the resource cost of providing Medicaid; estimates of the expected transfer Medicaid provides to recipients are relatively stable across approaches, but estimates of its additional value from risk protection are more variable. We also estimate that the resource cost of providing Medicaid to an additional recipient is only 40% of Medicaid's total cost; 60% of Medicaid spending is a transfer to providers of uncompensated care for the low-income uninsured.

Examining the Prevalence of Adverse Childhood Experiences and Associated Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors Among Low-Income Uninsured Adults.

Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are linked to poor adult health outcomes, including cardiovascular disease. However, little is known about its prevalence, specifically in low-income populations. The objective of this study was to estimate the extent of ACEs in a low-income, nonclinical, uninsured adult population and assess the relationship between ACEs and cardiovascular disease risk factors. This study leverages the OHIE's (Oregon Health Insurance Experiment) study population, uninsured adults who were randomly selected to apply for Medicaid, and data collected through in-person health screenings. We objectively measured obesity, cholesterol, blood pressure, and blood sugar. Smoking, physical activity, and history of chronic disease were self-reported. Independent variables were the 10-item ACEs questions covering neglect, abuse, and household dysfunction. The sample consisted of 12 229 low-income, nonelderly uninsured adults who participated in the OHIE health screenings from 2009 to 2010. A total of 5929 (48%) returned a follow-up survey reporting ACEs in 2012. ACEs were more prevalent in low-income adults compared with previous estimates in a general clinical population, with notably high rates of emotional abuse, emotional neglect, and household dysfunction. ACEs were statistically associated with higher rates of obesity, smoking, and physical inactivity, but not high cholesterol or diabetes mellitus. We detected a strong relationship between ACEs and a self-reported history of a hypertension diagnosis but no statistically significant differences in being hypertensive. This study design allowed us to assess the prevalence of ACEs among uninsured low-income adults and the association between ACEs and clinical indicators of cardiovascular disease risk that are difficult to ordinarily observe. Low-income adults have high rates of ACEs than previous prevalence estimates and ACEs were associated with higher rates of multiple cardiovascular disease risk factors. As states continue to expand Medicaid to the previously uninsured, providers may want to consider incorporating trauma-based approaches to care delivery.

Timely Outpatient Follow-up Is Associated with Fewer Hospital Readmissions among Patients with Behavioral Health Conditions.

Hospital readmissions contribute to high health care costs and are an indicator of poor performance. Reducing readmissions through reconnecting patients to primary care after hospitalization is a solution that is particularly relevant to complex patients with behavioral health conditions. We therefore aimed to examine the rate of follow-up visits among patients with behavioral health conditions and to assess the impact of this visit on the subsequent rate of readmission. In this retrospective, observational study, we analyzed data from low-income uninsured adults with behavioral health conditions (n = 1905) enrolled in a health care coverage program implemented by a California County from 2012 to 2013. We used administrative encounter and eligibility data and 2 logistic regression models to predict the (1) likelihood of a timely follow-up outpatient visit and (2) likelihood of a readmission given a timely outpatient visit. Our outcomes were to calculate the marginal effects of an outpatient visit within 15 days and a readmission within 30 days of the index admission. The 15-day follow-up visit rate was 42% and readmission rate was 13%. Higher severity of illness (2.5%; P = .004; 95% CI, 0.01-0.04) and prior visits to providers (5.8%; P = .000; 95% CI, 0.04-0.08) increased the probability of a follow-up visit within 15 days. Follow-up visits (-2.5%; P = .021; 95% CI, -0.05-0.00) and a shorter index admission (0.5%; P = .039; 95% CI, 0.00-0.01) also reduced the risk of 30-day readmissions. The findings provide evidence that timely linking of behavioral health patients to outpatient care after hospitalization is an effective care transition strategy, as it is likely to reduce readmission rates.

The effect of primary care visits on other health care utilization: A randomized controlled trial of cash incentives offered to low income, uninsured adults in Virginia

We conducted a randomized controlled trial, enrolling low-income uninsured adults in Virginia (United States), to determine whether cash incentives are effective at encouraging a primary care provider (PCP) visit, and at lowering utilization and costs. Subjects were randomized to four groups: untreated controls, and one of three incentive arms with incentives of $0, $25, or $50 for visiting a PCP within six months of group assignment. We used the exogenous variation generated by the experiment to obtain causal evidence on the effects of a PCP visit. We observed modest reductions in non-urgent emergency department visits and increased outpatient visits, but no reductions in overall costs. These findings in utilization are consistent with the expectation that PCPs offer an alternative to the emergency department for non-emergent conditions. Total costs did not decline because any savings from avoiding the emergency department were offset by increased outpatient utilization.

The Impact of Medicaid Expansion on Voter Participation: Evidence from the Oregon Health Insurance Experiment

In 2008, a group of uninsured low-income adults in Oregon was selected by lottery for the chance to apply for Medicaid. Using this randomized design and state administrative data on voter behavior, we analyze how a Medicaid expansion affected voter turnout and registration. We find that Medicaid increased voter turnout in the November 2008 Presidential election by about 7 percent overall, with the effects concentrated in men (18 percent increase) and in residents of democratic counties (10 percent increase); there is suggestive evidence that the increase in voting reflected new voter registrations, rather than increased turnout among pre-existing registrants. There is no evidence of an increase in voter turnout in subsequent elections, up to and including the November 2010 midterm election.

Medicaid's Role in Health Reform and Closing the Coverage Gap.

Medicaid coverage matters for millions of low-income Americans, and especially for those with ongoing and serious health challenges. A source of comprehensive and affordable coverage, Medicaid has long been a cornerstone of federal and state efforts to improve access and health outcomes for very poor and medically vulnerable populations. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) leveraged Medicaid's role in serving the poor to broaden the program's reach to millions of low-income uninsured adults, and positioned the program as a fundamental component of the newly established continuum of public and private coverage. Looking ahead, if more states embrace the Medicaid expansion, there is the potential to build on this progress to significantly reduce the number of uninsured Americans.

Effects of Expanded California Health Coverage on Hospitals: Implications for ACA Medicaid Expansions.

To assess the effects on hospitals of early California actions to expand insurance coverage for low-income uninsured adults after passage of the Affordable Care Act. Data from the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development and the California Department of Health were merged with U.S. census data for 294 short-term general hospitals during the period 2009-2012. A difference-in-difference analysis was conducted with hospitals in counties that did not implement insurance expansions used as a comparison group. Variables examined included payer mix, costs of unreimbursed care, and hospital operating margin. Sensitivity analyses were conducted as well as a triple difference analysis. Effects were estimated for hospitals overall and by ownership type. California insurance expansions primarily benefited for-profit hospitals, with these facilities experiencing significant decreases in self-pay patients, increases in county-covered patients, and reductions in charity care. Most models yielded no significant change in payer mix and conflicting changes in unreimbursed care for nonprofit hospitals. California hospitals that treated the most uninsured prior to insurance expansions did not as a group experience substantial benefit in terms of reduced uninsured burden or better financial performance after program expansions occurred.

Medicaid Expansion Under the Affordable Care Act: Potential Changes in Receipt of Mental Health Treatment Among Low-Income Nonelderly Adults With Serious Mental Illness.

We designed this study to examine differences in receipt of mental health treatment between low-income uninsured nonelderly adults with serious mental illness (SMI) who were eligible for Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and their existing Medicaid counterparts. Assessing these differences might estimate the impact of the Medicaid expansion efforts under the ACA on receipt of mental health treatment among uninsured nonelderly adults with SMI. We examined data from 2000 persons aged 18 to 64 years who participated in the 2008 to 2013 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, had income below 138% of the federal poverty level, met SMI criteria, and either were uninsured (n = 1000) or had Medicaid-only coverage (n = 1000). We defined SMI according to the Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration Reorganization Act. We used descriptive analyses and logistic regression modeling. In the 28 states currently expanding Medicaid, the model-adjusted prevalence (MAP) of receiving mental health treatment among Medicaid-only enrollees with SMI (MAP = 71.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 65.74%, 76.29%) was 30.1% greater than their uninsured counterparts (MAP = 54.8%; 95% CI = 48.16%, 61.33%). In the United States, the MAP of receiving mental health treatment among Medicaid-only enrollees with SMI (MAP = 70.4%; 95% CI = 65.67%, 74.70%) was 35.9% higher than their uninsured counterparts (MAP = 51.8%; 95% CI = 46.98%, 56.65%). Estimated increases in receipt of mental health treatment because of enrolling in Medicaid among low-income uninsured adults with SMI might help inform planning and implementation efforts for the Medicaid expansion under the ACA.

Medicaid expansion in opt-out states would produce consumer savings and less financial burden than exchange coverage.

In the twenty-three states that have decided against expanding Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act, uninsured adults who would have been eligible for Medicaid and have incomes at or above the federal poverty guidelines are generally eligible for Marketplace (insurance exchange) premium tax credits and plans with generous benefits. This study compared estimated out-of-pocket spending for care and premiums, as well as the financial burdens they impose, for the families of these adults under two simulation scenarios: obtaining coverage through a silver plan with subsidized cost sharing and enrolling in expanded Medicaid. Compared with Marketplace coverage, Medicaid would more than halve average annual out-of-pocket spending ($938 versus $1,948), while dramatically reducing the percentage of adults in families with out-of-pocket expenses exceeding 10 percent or 20 percent of income (6.0 percent versus 17.1 percent and 0.9 percent versus 3.7 percent, respectively). Larger reductions would be seen for families with smokers, who under Medicaid would no longer be subject to Marketplace tobacco user surcharges. Medicaid expansion may offer a greater opportunity than access to Marketplace insurance to promote the financial well-being of previously uninsured low-income adults.

The effects of expanding public insurance to rural low-income childless adults.

This study measures the change in health care use after enrollment into a new public insurance program for low-income childless adults. The data sources include claims from a large integrated health system in rural Wisconsin and Medicaid enrollment files, January 2007-September 2012. We employ a regression discontinuity design to measure the causal effect of public insurance enrollment on counts of outpatient, emergency department, and inpatient events for 2years following enrollment for a sample of previously uninsured low-income adults in rural Wisconsin. Public insurance enrollment led to substantial increases in outpatient visits including preventive visits, but not mental health visits. Public insurance enrollment also led to increases in inpatient stays, but the study is inconclusive on whether it led to an increase in ED visits. Public insurance expansions to childless adults have the potential to impact the use of health care. The large increase in Medicaid coverage and reduction in rates of uninsurance anticipated to result from the Affordable Care Act should increase the use of inpatient and outpatient services, but they will have an uncertain impact on the use of ED among rural populations.

Characteristics of Uninsured Low-Income Adults in States Expanding vs Not Expanding Medicaid

Characteristics of Uninsured Low-Income Adults in States Expanding vs Not Expanding Medicaid

Oregon's coordinated care organizations.

Whenever Medicaid is mentioned, Oregon always seems to be at the center of attention and controversy.Two decades ago, Oregon's efforts to prioritize expenditures through the systematic and public ranking of medical services created a storm of controversy, as well as worldwide debate over the morality and administrative feasibility of (at least supposed) rationing of services to control Medicaid expenditures (Oberlander, Marmor, and Jacobs 2001).Within the past year, the Oregon Health Insurance Experiment (OHIE) has made front-page news. In 2008, Oregon opened a waiting list for a limited number of low-income uninsured adults to receive Medicaid. State officials drew names by lottery from ninety thousand people who had signed up for a waiting list. This lottery structure made possible a rigorous randomized trial, within which one could explore the impact of Medicaid enrollment on health services use, physical and mental health, and the burdens of medical debt (Finkelstein et al. 2012. Most recently, OHIE hit the front pages with its finding that enrolling uninsured adults into Medicaid increased rates of emergency department use (Pollack 2014; Taubman et al. 2014.Delivery system innovations receive less attention than do issues of apparent rationing or expanded Medicaid access. Yet these are scarcely less important. Oregon's coordinated care organizations (CCOs) represent one of the nation's most ambitious efforts to improve quality and cost-effectiveness while reducing expenditures through medical homes and improved coordination of care. Steven Howard, Stephanie Bernell, Jangho Yoon, and Jeff Luck's Point essay enthusiastically supports these new arrangements, citing early indications that CCOs have reduced emergency department visits and hospitalizations. Eric Stecker's Counterpoint is more skeptical, noting how the CCO experiment could founder.1As we seek to address significant cost and quality challenges in American health care, much rides on the ability of innovations such as CCOs to overcome the inertia, fragmentation, and incentive pathologies embedded in fee-for-service models. As of this writing, the jury is out.

The Impact of Medicaid on Labor Market Activity and Program Participation: Evidence from the Oregon Health Insurance Experiment.

In 2008, a group of uninsured low-income adults in Oregon was selected by lottery for the chance to apply for Medicaid. Using this randomized design and 2009 administrative data, we find no significant effect of Medicaid on employment or earnings. Our 95 percent confidence intervals allow us to reject that Medicaid causes a decline in employment of more than 4.4 percentage points, or an increase of more than 1.2 percentage points. Medicaid increases food stamps receipt, but has little, if any, impact on receipt of other measured government benefits, including SSDI.

Health Status, Risk Factors, and Medical Conditions Among Persons Enrolled in Medicaid vs Uninsured Low-Income Adults Potentially Eligible for Medicaid Under the Affordable Care Act

Under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), states can extend Medicaid eligibility to nearly all adults with income no more than 138% of the federal poverty level. Uncertainty exists regarding the scope of medical services required for new enrollees. To document the health care needs and health risks of uninsured adults who could gain Medicaid coverage under the ACA. These data will help physicians, other clinicians, and state Medicaid programs prepare for the possible expansions. Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007-2010 were used to analyze health conditions among a nationally representative sample of 1042 uninsured adults aged 19 through 64 years with income no more than 138% of the federal poverty level, compared with 471 low-income adults currently enrolled in Medicaid. Prevalence and control of diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia based on examinations and laboratory tests, measures of self-reported health status including medical conditions, and risk factors such as measured obesity status. Compared with those already enrolled in Medicaid, uninsured adults were less likely to be obese and sedentary and less likely to report a physical, mental, or emotional limitation. They also were less likely to have several chronic conditions. For example, 30.1% (95% CI, 26.8%-33.4%) of uninsured adults had hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, or diabetes compared with 38.6% (95% CI, 32.0%-45.3%) of those enrolled in Medicaid (P = .02). However, if they had these conditions, uninsured adults were less likely to be aware of them and less likely to have them controlled. For example, 80.1% (95% CI, 75.2%-85.1%) of the uninsured adults with at least 1 of these 3 conditions had at least 1 uncontrolled condition, compared with 63.4% (95% CI, 53.7%-73.1%) of adults enrolled in Medicaid. Compared with adults currently enrolled in Medicaid, uninsured low-income adults potentially eligible to enroll in Medicaid under the ACA had a lower prevalence of many chronic conditions. A substantial proportion of currently uninsured adults with chronic conditions did not have good disease control; projections based on sample weighting suggest this may represent 3.5 million persons (95% CI, 2.9 million-4.2 million). These adults may need initial intensive medical care following Medicaid enrollment.

THE OREGON HEALTH INSURANCE EXPERIMENT: EVIDENCE FROM THE FIRST YEAR.

In 2008, a group of uninsured low-income adults in Oregon was selected by lottery to be given the chance to apply for Medicaid. This lottery provides an opportunity to gauge the effects of expanding access to public health insurance on the health care use, financial strain, and health of low-income adults using a randomized controlled design. In the year after random assignment, the treatment group selected by the lottery was about 25 percentage points more likely to have insurance than the control group that was not selected. We find that in this first year, the treatment group had substantively and statistically significantly higher health care utilization (including primary and preventive care as well as hospitalizations), lower out-of-pocket medical expenditures and medical debt (including fewer bills sent to collection), and better self-reported physical and mental health than the control group.

The Cost of Medicaid Coverage for the Uninsured: Evidence From Buncombe County, North Carolina

The Affordable Care Act gives states the option to expand state Medicaid programs to cover many who are currently uninsured. The potential financial impact has not been thoroughly examined. We characterized the health risk of uninsured adults in Buncombe County, North Carolina, relative to that of local Medicaid recipients, to estimate the cost of expanding Medicaid coverage to include the uninsured. We obtained de-identified patient enrollment and claims data for 2008 from the Division of Medical Assistance, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services and from the 3 safety-net providers who care for most of the county's low-income uninsured adults. We used the Chronic Illness and Disability Payment System (CDPS) risk-adjustment tool to measure the relative health risk of the two populations. Based on actual spending in the Medicaid group and its health risk relative to that of the uninsured, we then projected how much it would have cost to provide Medicaid coverage for these uninsured in 2008. We estimated, based on CDPS adjustment for demographics and diagnoses, that these uninsured adults would have incurred costs 13% greater than those of the actual nondisabled adult Medicaid population. The projected cost of providing Medicaid coverage to these uninsured would have been $4,320 per person. Data were drawn from only the 3 major safety-net organizations and therefore excluded care obtained from other safety-net providers. Also, this sample of uninsured people included some who are ineligible for Medicaid because of their citizenship status. Furthermore, Medicaid enrollment might lead to increased utilization, revealing a greater burden of illness than we detected. In Buncombe County, uninsured adults who enroll in expanded Medicaid are likely to have somewhat more costly health problems than do currently enrolled nondisabled adults.