Low-frequency Acoustic Hearing Research Articles

Variables Affecting Cochlear Implant Performance After Loss of Residual Hearing.

Determine variables that influence post-activation performance for cochlear implant (CI) recipients who lost low-frequency acoustic hearing. A retrospective review evaluated CNC word recognition for adults with normal to moderately severe low-frequency hearing (preoperative unaided thresholds of ≤70 dB HL at 250 Hz) who were implanted between 2012 and 2021 at a tertiary academic center, lost functional acoustic hearing, and were fit with a CI-alone device. Performance scores were queried from the 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24-month post-activation visits. A linear mixed model evaluated the effects of age at implantation, array length (long vs. mid/short), and preoperative low-frequency hearing (normal to mild, moderate, and moderately severe) on speech recognition with a CI alone. 113 patients met the inclusion criteria. There was a significant main effect of interval (p < 0.001), indicating improved word recognition post-activation despite loss of residual hearing. There were significant main effects of age (p = 0.029) and array length (p = 0.038), with no effect of preoperative low-frequency hearing (p = 0.171). There was a significant 2-way interaction between age and array length (p = 0.018), indicating that older adults with mid/short arrays performed more poorly than younger adults with long lateral wall arrays when functional acoustic hearing was lost. CI recipients with preoperative functional low-frequency hearing experience a significant improvement in speech recognition with a CI alone as compared to preoperative performance-despite the loss of low-frequency hearing. Age and electrode array length may play a role in post-activation performance. These data have implications for the preoperative counseling and device selection for hearing preservation candidates. 4 Laryngoscope, 134:1868-1873, 2024.

Acoustically Evoked Compound Action Potentials Recorded From Cochlear Implant Users With Preserved Acoustic Hearing.

Less traumatic intracochlear electrode design and the introduction of the soft surgery technique allow for the preservation of low-frequency acoustic hearing in many cochlear implant (CI) users. Recently, new electrophysiologic methods have also been developed that allow acoustically evoked peripheral responses to be measured in vivo from an intracochlear electrode. These recordings provide clues to the status of peripheral auditory structures. Unfortunately, responses generated from the auditory nerve (auditory nerve neurophonic [ANN]) are somewhat difficult to record because they are smaller than the hair cell responses (cochlear microphonic). Additionally, it is difficult to completely segregate the ANN from the cochlear microphonic, complicating the interpretation and limiting clinical applications. The compound action potential (CAP) is a synchronous response of multiple auditory nerve fibers and may provide an alternative to ANN where the status of the auditory nerve is of primary interest. This study is a within-subject comparison of CAPs recorded using traditional stimuli (clicks and 500 Hz tone bursts) and a new stimulus (CAP chirp). We hypothesized that the chirp stimulus might result in a more robust CAP than that recorded using traditional stimuli, allowing for a more accurate assessment of the status of the auditory nerve. Nineteen adult Nucleus L24 Hybrid CI users with residual low-frequency hearing participated in this study. CAP responses were recorded from the most apical intracochlear electrode using a 100 μs click, 500 Hz tone bursts, and chirp stimuli presented via the insert phone to the implanted ear. The chirp stimulus used in this study was CAP chirp generated using parameters from human-derived band CAPs ( Chertoff et al. 2010 ). Additionally, nine custom chirps were created by systematically varying the frequency sweep rate of the power function used to construct the standard CAP chirp stimulus. CAPs were recorded using all acoustic stimuli, allowing for within-subject comparisons of the CAP amplitude, threshold, percentage of measurable CAP responses, and waveform morphology. Considerable variation in response morphology was apparent across stimuli and stimulation levels. Clicks and CAP chirp significantly evoked identifiable CAP response more compared to 500 Hz tone bursts. At relatively high stimulation levels, the chirp-evoked CAPs were significantly larger in amplitude and less ambiguous in morphology than the click-evoked CAPs. The status of residual acoustic hearing at high frequencies influenced the likelihood that a CAP could be reliably recorded. Subjects with better preserved hearing at high frequencies had significantly larger CAP amplitudes when CAP chirp was used. Customizing the chirp stimulus by varying the frequency sweep rates significantly affected the CAP amplitudes; however, pairwise comparisons did not show significant differences between chirps. CAPs can be measured more effectively using broadband acoustic stimuli than 500 Hz tone bursts in CI users with residual low-frequency acoustic hearing. The advantage of using CAP chirp stimulus relative to standard clicks is dependent on the extent of preserved acoustic hearing at high frequencies and the stimulus level. The chirp stimulus may present an attractive alternative to standard clicks or tone bursts for this CI population when the goal is to record robust CAP responses.

Slim Modiolar Electrode Placement in Candidates for Electroacoustic Stimulation.

To determine rates of hearing preservation and performance in patients who met candidacy for electroacoustic stimulation (EAS) and were implanted with a slim modiolar electrode (CI532 or CI632). Adult patients meeting Food and Drug Administration criteria for electroacoustic stimulation (preoperative low-frequency pure-tone average [LFPTA] less than 60 dB at 125, 250, and 500 Hz and monosyllabic word scores between 10% and 60% in the ear to be implanted), who received a slim modiolar electrode were included. Main outcome measures included rates of hearing preservation, defined as a LFPTA ≤80 dB at 125, 250, and 500 Hz, as well as postoperative low-frequency pure-tone threshold shifts, consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) word scores and AzBio sentences in noise scores. Forty-six patients met inclusion criteria during a 4-year period. Mean (standard deviation) preoperative LFPTA was 34.5 (13.0) dB, and 71.7% had preserved hearing at initial activation. The mean LFPTA shift in patients who preserved hearing at initial activation was 19.7 (14.6) dB, compared with 62.6 (17.7) dB in patients who did not preserve hearing as per our definition. Perioperative steroid use was not different in patients with and without preserved hearing (X 2 (1, N = 46) = 0.19, p = .67, V = 0.06). One year after surgery, 57% of patients had a decline in LFPTA >80 dB and were no longer considered candidates for EAS, with 34.7% still retaining low-frequency thresholds ≤80 dB. CNC word scores at 1 year were 69.9% and 61.4% among individuals with and without preserved low-frequency hearing respectively, measured in their CI ear alone, in their regular listening condition of EAS or electric only ( t (32) = 1.13, p = 0.27, d = 0.39, 95% CI = -6.51, 22.86). Device use time did not differ between groups. Among adults with preserved residual hearing at 1 year (n = 16), 44% used EAS, although there was no significant difference in performance between EAS users and nonusers with preserved hearing. Loss of residual hearing over time did not result in a decline in speech perception performance. The present study demonstrated favorable early rates of hearing preservation with a slim modiolar array. Performance was not significantly different in individuals with and without preserved low-frequency acoustic hearing, independent of EAS use. Compared with reports of short electrode use, the loss of residual hearing in patients implanted with this array did not impact speech perception performance.

Phantom Stimulation for Cochlear Implant Users With Residual Low-Frequency Hearing.

Objective:In cochlear implants (CIs), phantom stimulation can be used to extend the pitch range toward apical regions of the cochlea. Phantom stimulation consists of partial bipolar stimulation, in which current is distributed across two intracochlear electrodes and one extracochlear electrode as defined by the compensation coefficient σ. The aim of this study was, (1) to evaluate the benefit of conveying low-frequency information through phantom stimulation for cochlear implant (CI) subjects with low-frequency residual hearing using electric stimulation alone, (2) to compare the speech reception thresholds obtained from electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) and electric stimulation in combination with phantom stimulation (EPS), and (3) to investigate the effect of spectrally overlapped bandwidth of speech conveyed via simultaneous acoustic and phantom stimulation on speech reception thresholds.Design:Fourteen CI users with ipsilateral residual hearing participated in a repeated-measures design. Phantom stimulation was used to extend the frequency bandwidth of electric stimulation of EAS users towards lower frequencies without changing their accustomed electrode-frequency allocation. Three phantom stimulation configurations with different σ’s were tested causing different degrees of electric field shaping towards apical regions of the cochlea that may affect the place of stimulation. A baseline configuration using a moderate value of σ () for all subjects, a configuration that was equivalent to monopolar stimulation by setting σ to 0 () and a configuration that used the largest value of σ for each individual subject (). Speech reception thresholds were measured for electric stimulation alone, EAS and EPS. Additionally, acoustic stimulation and phantom stimulation were presented simultaneously (EAS+PS) to investigate their mutual interaction. Besides the spectral overlap, the electrode insertion depth obtained from cone-beam computed-tomography scans was determined to assess the impact of spatial overlap between electric and acoustic stimulation on speech reception.Results:Speech perception significantly improved by providing additional acoustic or phantom stimulation to electric stimulation. There was no significant difference between EAS and EPS. However, two of the tested subjects were able to perform the speech perception test using EAS but not using EPS. In comparison to the subject’s familiar EAS listening mode, the speech perception deteriorated when acoustic stimulation and phantom stimulation conveyed spectrally overlapped information simultaneously and this deterioration increased with larger spectral overlapConclusions:(1) CI users with low-frequency acoustic residual hearing benefit from low-frequency information conveyed acoustically through combined EAS. (2) Improved speech reception thresholds through low-frequency information conveyed via phantom stimulation were observed for EAS subjects when acoustic stimulation was not used. (3) Speech perception was negatively affected by combining acoustic and phantom stimulation when both stimulation modalities overlapped spectrally in comparison to the familiar EAS.

Bimodal Benefits Revealed by Categorical Perception of Lexical Tones in Mandarin-Speaking Kindergarteners With a Cochlear Implant and a Contralateral Hearing Aid.

Purpose Pitch reception poses challenges for individuals with cochlear implants (CIs), and adding a hearing aid (HA) in the nonimplanted ear is potentially beneficial. The current study used fine-scale synthetic speech stimuli to investigate the bimodal benefit for lexical tone categorization in Mandarin-speaking kindergarteners using a CI and an HA in opposite ears. Method The data were collected from 16 participants who were required to complete two classical tasks for speech categorical perception (CP) with CI + HA device condition and CI alone condition. Linear mixed-effects models were constructed to evaluate the identification and discrimination scores across different device conditions. Results The bimodal kindergarteners showed CP for the continuum varying from Mandarin Tone 1 and Tone 2. Moreover, the additional acoustic information from the contralateral HA contributes to improved lexical tone categorization, with a steeper slope, a higher discrimination score of between-category stimuli pair, and an improved peakedness score (i.e., an increased benefit magnitude for discriminations of between-category over within-category pairs) for the CI + HA condition than the CI alone condition. The bimodal kindergarteners with better residual hearing thresholds at 250 Hz level in the nonimplanted ear could perceive lexical tones more categorically. Conclusion The enhanced CP results with bimodal listening provide clear evidence for the clinical practice to fit a contralateral HA in the nonimplanted ear in kindergarteners with unilateral CIs with direct benefits from the low-frequency acoustic hearing.

Assessing the Quality of Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing: Implications for Combined Electroacoustic Stimulation With Cochlear Implants.

There are many potential advantages to combined electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS) with a cochlear implant (CI), including benefits for hearing in noise, localization, frequency selectivity, and music enjoyment. However, performance on these outcome measures is variable, and the residual acoustic hearing may not be beneficial for all patients. As such, we propose a measure of spectral resolution that might be more predictive of the usefulness of the residual hearing than the audiogram alone. In the following experiments, we measured performance on spectral resolution and speech perception tasks in individuals with normal hearing (NH) using low-pass filters to simulate steeply sloping audiograms of typical EAS candidates and compared it with performance on these tasks for individuals with sensorineural hearing loss with similar audiometric configurations. Because listeners with NH had similar levels of audibility and bandwidth to listeners with hearing loss, differences between the groups could be attributed to distortions due to hearing loss. Listeners with NH (n = 12) and those with hearing loss (n = 23) with steeply sloping audiograms participated in this study. The group with hearing loss consisted of 7 EAS users, 14 hearing aid users, and 3 who did not use amplification in the test ear. Spectral resolution was measured with the spectral-temporal modulated ripple test (SMRT), and speech perception was measured with AzBio sentences in quiet and noise. Listeners with NH listened to stimuli through low-pass filters and at two levels (40 and 60 dBA) to simulate low and high audibility. Listeners with hearing loss listened to SMRT stimuli unaided at their most comfortable listening level and speech stimuli at 60 dBA. Results suggest that performance with SMRT is significantly worse for listeners with hearing loss than for listeners with NH and is not related to audibility. Performance on the speech perception task declined with decreasing frequency information for both listeners with NH and hearing loss. Significant correlations were observed between speech perception, SMRT scores, and mid-frequency audiometric thresholds for listeners with hearing loss. NH simulations describe a "best case scenario" for hearing loss where audibility is the only deficit. For listeners with hearing loss, the likely broadening of auditory filters, loss of cochlear nonlinearities, and possible cochlear dead regions may have contributed to distorted spectral resolution and thus deviations from the NH simulations. Measures of spectral resolution may capture an aspect of hearing loss not evident from the audiogram and be a useful tool for assessing the contributions of residual hearing post-cochlear implantation.

Electro-Tactile Stimulation Enhances Cochlear-Implant Melody Recognition: Effects of Rhythm and Musical Training.

Electro-acoustic stimulation (EAS) enhances speech and music perception in cochlear-implant (CI) users who have residual low-frequency acoustic hearing. For CI users who do not have low-frequency acoustic hearing, tactile stimulation may be used in a similar fashion as residual low-frequency acoustic hearing to enhance CI performance. Previous studies showed that electro-tactile stimulation (ETS) enhanced speech recognition in noise and tonal language perception for CI listeners. Here, we examined the effect of ETS on melody recognition in both musician and nonmusician CI users. Nine musician and eight nonmusician CI users were tested in a melody recognition task with or without rhythmic cues in three testing conditions: CI only (E), tactile only (T), and combined CI and tactile stimulation (ETS). Overall, the combined electrical and tactile stimulation enhanced the melody recognition performance in CI users by 9% points. Two additional findings were observed. First, musician CI users outperformed nonmusicians CI users in melody recognition, but the size of the enhancement effect was similar between the two groups. Second, the ETS enhancement was significantly higher with nonrhythmic melodies than rhythmic melodies in both groups. These findings suggest that, independent of musical experience, the size of the ETS enhancement depends on integration efficiency between tactile and auditory stimulation, and that the mechanism of the ETS enhancement is improved electric pitch perception. The present study supports the hypothesis that tactile stimulation can be used to improve pitch perception in CI users.

Intraoperative Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential (ECAP) Measurements in Traditional and Hearing Preservation Cochlear Implantation.

In current practice, the status of residual low-frequency acoustic hearing in hearing preservation cochlear implantation (CI) is unknown until activation two to three weeks postoperatively. The intraoperatively measured electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP), a synchronous response from electrically stimulated auditory nerve fibers, is one of the first markers of auditory nerve function after cochlear implant surgery and such may provide information regarding the status of residual low-frequency acoustic hearing. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between intraoperative ECAP at the time of CI and presence of preoperative and postoperative low-frequency acoustic hearing. A retrospective case review. Two hundred seventeen adult ears receiving CI (42 Advanced Bionics, 82 Cochlear, and 93 MED-EL implants). Intraoperative ECAP and CI. ECAP measurements were obtained intraoperatively, whereas residual hearing data were obtained from postoperative CI activation audiogram. A linear mixed model test revealed no interaction effects for the following variables: manufacturer, electrode location (basal, middle, and apical), preoperative low-frequency pure-tone average (LFPTA), and postoperative LFPTA. The postoperative residual low-frequency hearing status was defined as preservation of unaided air conduction thresholds ≤90 dB at 250 Hz. Electrode location and hearing preservation data were analyzed individually for both the ECAP threshold and ECAP maximum amplitude using multiple t-tests, without assuming a consistent standard deviation between the groups, and with alpha correction. The maximum amplitude, in microvolts, was significantly higher throughout apical and middle regions of the cochlea in patients who had preserved low-frequency acoustic hearing as compared with those who did not have preserved hearing (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0088, respectively). ECAP threshold, in microamperes, was significantly lower throughout the apical region of the cochlea in patients with preserved low-frequency acoustic hearing as compared with those without preserved hearing (p = 0.0099). Basal electrode maximum amplitudes and middle and basal electrode thresholds were not significantly correlated with postoperative low-frequency hearing. Apical and middle electrode maximum amplitudes and apical electrode thresholds detected through intraoperative ECAP measurements are significantly correlated with preservation of low-frequency acoustic hearing. This association may represent a potential immediate feedback mechanism for postoperative outcomes that can be applied to all CIs.

Vibrotactile Stimulation Based on the Fundamental Frequency Can Improve Melodic Contour Identification of Normal-Hearing Listeners With a 4-Channel Cochlear Implant Simulation.

Cochlear implant (CI) users’ poor speech recognition in noise and music perception may be both due to their limited access to pitch cues such as the fundamental frequency (F0). Recent studies showed that similar to residual low-frequency acoustic hearing, vibrotactile presentation of the F0 significantly improved speech recognition in noise of CI users. The present study tested whether F0-based vibrotactile stimulation can improve melodic contour identification (MCI) of normal-hearing listeners with acoustically simulated CI processing. Each melodic contour consisted of five musical notes with one of nine contour patterns (rising, falling, or flat in each half of the contour). The F0 of the middle note was 220 or 880 Hz, and the frequency intervals between adjacent notes were 1, 3, or 5 semitones. The F0 of each note was extracted in real time and transposed to a vibration frequency centered around 110 Hz at the right forearm top. MCI was tested in five experimental conditions (with a 4- or 8-channel CI simulation alone, vibrotactile stimulation alone, and 4- or 8-channel CI simulation plus vibrotactile stimulation), each after the same amount of brief training was provided. Results showed that discrimination of vibrotactile stimuli significantly improved from chance to near perfect as the vibration frequency interval increased from 0.25 to 3 semitones. The MCI performance with vibrotactile stimulation alone was similar to that with the 4-channel CI simulation alone, but was significantly worse than that with the 8-channel CI simulation alone. Significant improvement in MCI performance with the addition of vibrotactile stimulation was only found with the 4-channel CI simulation when the middle F0 was 880 Hz and when the frequency intervals were 3 or 5 semitones. The improvement in MCI performance with than without vibrotactile stimulation was significantly correlated with the baseline MCI performance with 4-channel CI simulation alone or with the MCI performance difference between vibrotactile stimulation and 8-channel CI simulation. Therefore, when the simulated or real CI performance is relatively poor, vibrotactile stimulation based on the F0 may improve MCI with acoustic CI simulations and perhaps in real CI users as well.

Binaural interference with simulated electric acoustic stimulation.

Preserved low-frequency acoustic hearing in cochlear implant (CI) recipients affords combined electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) that could improve access to low-frequency acoustic binaural cues and enhance spatial hearing. Such benefits, however, could be undermined by interactions between electrical and acoustical inputs to adjacent (spectral overlap) or distant (binaural interference) cochlear places in EAS. This study simulated EAS in normal-hearing listeners, measuring interaural time difference (ITD) and interaural level difference (ILD) discrimination thresholds for a low-frequency noise (simulated acoustic target) in the presence or absence of a pulsatile high-frequency complex presented monotically or diotically (simulated unilateral or bilateral electric distractor). Unilateral distractors impaired thresholds for both cue types, suggesting influences of both binaural interference (which appeared more consistently for ITD than ILD) and physical spectral overlap (for both cue types). Reducing spectral overlap with an EAS gap between 1 and 3 kHz consistently improved binaural sensitivity. Finally, listeners displayed significantly lower thresholds with simulated bilateral versus unilateral electric stimulation. The combined effects revealed similar or better thresholds in bilateral full spectral overlap than in unilateral EAS gap conditions, suggesting that bilateral implantation with bilateral acoustic hearing preservation could allow for higher tolerance of spectral overlap in CI users and improved binaural sensitivity over unilateral EAS.

Hybrid Music Perception Outcomes: Implications for Melody and Timbre Recognition in Cochlear Implant Recipients.

To examine whether or not electric-acoustic music perception outcomes, observed in a recent Hybrid L24 clinical trial, were related to the availability of low-frequency acoustic cues not present in the electric domain. Prospective, repeated-measures, within-subject design. Academic research hospital. Nine normally hearing individuals. Simulated electric-acoustic hearing in normally hearing individuals. Acutely measured melody and timbre recognition scores from the University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music Perception (CAMP) test. Melody recognition scores were consistently better for listening conditions that included low-frequency acoustic information. Mean scores for both acoustic (73.5%, S.D. = 15.5%) and electric-acoustic (67.9%, S.D. = 21.2%) conditions were significantly better (p < 0.001) than electric alone (39.2%, S.D. = 18.1%). This was not the case for timbre recognition for which scores were more variable across simulated listening modes with no significant differences found in mean scores across electric (36.1%, S.D. = 17.7%), acoustic (38.0%, S.D. = 20.4%), and electric-acoustic (40.7%, S.D. = 19.7%) conditions (p > 0.05). Recipients of hybrid cochlear implants demonstrate music perception abilities superior to those observed in traditional cochlear implant recipients. Results from the present study support the notion that electric-acoustic stimulation confers advantages related to the availability of low-frequency acoustic hearing, most particularly for melody recognition. However, timbre recognition remains more limited for both hybrid and traditional cochlear implant users. Opportunities remain for new coding strategies to improve timbre perception.

Factors Affecting Bimodal Benefit in Pediatric Mandarin-Speaking Chinese Cochlear Implant Users.

While fundamental frequency (F0) cues are important to both lexical tone perception and multitalker segregation, F0 cues are poorly perceived by cochlear implant (CI) users. Adding low-frequency acoustic hearing via a hearing aid in the contralateral ear may improve CI users' F0 perception. For English-speaking CI users, contralateral acoustic hearing has been shown to improve perception of target speech in noise and in competing talkers. For tonal languages such as Mandarin Chinese, F0 information is lexically meaningful. Given competing F0 information from multiple talkers and lexical tones, contralateral acoustic hearing may be especially beneficial for Mandarin-speaking CI users' perception of competing speech. Bimodal benefit (CI+hearing aid - CI-only) was evaluated in 11 pediatric Mandarin-speaking Chinese CI users. In experiment 1, speech recognition thresholds (SRTs) were adaptively measured using a modified coordinated response measure test; subjects were required to correctly identify 2 keywords from among 10 choices in each category. SRTs were measured with CI-only or bimodal listening in the presence of steady state noise (SSN) or competing speech with the same (M+M) or different voice gender (M+F). Unaided thresholds in the non-CI ear and demographic factors were compared with speech performance. In experiment 2, SRTs were adaptively measured in SSN for recognition of 5 keywords, a more difficult listening task than the 2-keyword recognition task in experiment 1. In experiment 1, SRTs were significantly lower for SSN than for competing speech in both the CI-only and bimodal listening conditions. There was no significant difference between CI-only and bimodal listening for SSN and M+F (p > 0.05); SRTs were significantly lower for CI-only than for bimodal listening for M+M (p < 0.05), suggesting bimodal interference. Subjects were able to make use of voice gender differences for bimodal listening (p < 0.05) but not for CI-only listening (p > 0.05). Unaided thresholds in the non-CI ear were positively correlated with bimodal SRTs for M+M (p < 0.006) but not for SSN or M+F. No significant correlations were observed between any demographic variables and SRTs (p > 0.05 in all cases). In experiment 2, SRTs were significantly lower with two than with five keywords (p < 0.05). A significant bimodal benefit was observed only for the 5-keyword condition (p < 0.05). With the CI alone, subjects experienced greater interference with competing speech than with SSN and were unable to use voice gender difference to segregate talkers. For the coordinated response measure task, subjects experienced no bimodal benefit and even bimodal interference when competing talkers were the same voice gender. A bimodal benefit in SSN was observed for the five-keyword condition but not for the two-keyword condition, suggesting that bimodal listening may be more beneficial as the difficulty of the listening task increased. The present data suggest that bimodal benefit may depend on the type of masker and/or the difficulty of the listening task.

Electric and Acoustic Stimulation in Cochlear Implant Recipients with Hearing Preservation.

Hearing loss affects 30 million people in the United States, and a subset of these patients have normal low-frequency hearing and ski-sloped high-frequency hearing loss. For these patients, hearing aids alone may not provide adequate benefit. Cochlear implantation alone has been utilized to improve speech perception. The addition of high-frequency electric hearing to low-frequency acoustic hearing in these patients is beneficial. Technical improvements have allowed preservation of low-frequency hearing in cochlear implant recipients, allowing for electric and acoustic stimulation in the same ear with significant improvements in speech perception, sound localization, music appreciation, and quality of life.

Electric and acoustic harmonic integration predicts speech-in-noise performance in hybrid cochlear implant users

BackgroundPitch perception of complex tones relies on place or temporal fine structure-based mechanisms from resolved harmonics and the temporal envelope of unresolved harmonics. Combining this information is essential for speech-in-noise performance, as it allows segregation of a target speaker from background noise. In hybrid cochlear implant (H-CI) users, low frequency acoustic hearing should provide pitch from resolved harmonics while high frequency electric hearing should provide temporal envelope pitch from unresolved harmonics. How the acoustic and electric auditory inputs interact for H-CI users is largely unknown. Harmonicity and inharmonicity are emergent features of sound in which overtones are concordant or discordant with the fundamental frequency. We hypothesized that some H-CI users would be able to integrate acoustic and electric information for complex tone pitch perception, and that this ability would be correlated with speech-in-noise performance. In this study, we used perception of inharmonicity to demonstrate this integration. MethodsFifteen H-CI users with only acoustic hearing below 500 Hz, only electric hearing above 2 kHz, and more than 6 months CI experience, along with eighteen normal hearing (NH) controls, were presented with harmonic and inharmonic sounds. The stimulus was created with a low frequency component, corresponding with the H-CI user's acoustic hearing (fundamental frequency between 125 and 174 Hz), and a high frequency component, corresponding with electric hearing. Subjects were asked to identify the more inharmonic sound, which requires the perceptual integration of the low and high components. Speech-in-noise performance was tested in both groups using the California Consonant Test (CCT), and perception of Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) words in quiet and AzBio sentences in noise were tested for the H-CI users. ResultsEight of the H-CI subjects (53%), and all of the NH subjects, scored significantly above chance level for at least one subset of the inharmonicity detection task. Inharmonicity detection ability, but not age or pure tone average, predicted speech scores in a linear model. These results were significantly correlated with speech scores in both quiet and noise for H-CI users, but not with speech in noise performance for NH listeners. Musical experience predicted inharmonicity detection ability, but did not predict speech performance. ConclusionsWe demonstrate integration of acoustic and electric information in H-CI users for complex pitch sensation. The correlation with speech scores in H-CI users might be associated with the ability to segregate a target speaker from background noise using the speaker's fundamental frequency.

The discrimination of voice cues in simulations of bimodal electro-acoustic cochlear-implant hearing.

In discriminating speakers' voices, normal-hearing individuals effectively use two vocal characteristics, vocal pitch (related to fundamental frequency, F0) and vocal-tract length (VTL, related to speaker size). Typical cochlear-implant users show poor perception of these cues. However, in implant users with low-frequency residual acoustic hearing, this bimodal electro-acoustic stimulation may provide additional voice-related cues, such as low-numbered harmonics and formants, which could improve F0/VTL perception. In acoustic noise-vocoder simulations, where added low-pass filtered speech simulated residual hearing, a strong bimodal benefit was observed for F0 perception. No bimodal benefit was observed for VTL, which seems to mainly rely on vocoder spectral resolution.

Electro-tactile stimulation (ETS) enhances cochlear-implant Mandarin tone recognition.

ObjectiveElectro-acoustic stimulation (EAS) is an effective method to enhance cochlear-implant performance in individuals who have residual low-frequency acoustic hearing. To help the majority of cochlear implant users who do not have any functional residual acoustic hearing, electro-tactile stimulation (ETS) may be used because tactile sensation has a frequency range and perceptual capabilities similar to that produced by acoustic stimulation in the EAS users.MethodsFollowing up the first ETS study showing enhanced English sentence recognition in noise,1 the present study evaluated the effect of ETS on Mandarin tone recognition in noise in two groups of adult Mandarin-speaking individuals. The first group included 11 normal-hearing individuals who listened to a 4-channel, noise-vocoded, cochlear-implant simulation. The second group included 1 unilateral cochlear-implant user and 2 bilateral users with each of their devices being tested independently. Both groups participated in a 4-alternative, forced-choice task, in which they had to identify a tone that was presented in noise at a 0-dB signal-to-noise ratio via electric stimulation (actual or simulated cochlear implants), tactile stimulation or the combined ETS.ResultsWhile electric or tactile stimulation alone produced similar tone recognition (∼40% correct), the ETS enhanced the cochlear-implant tone recognition by 17–18 percentage points. The size of the present ETS enhancement effect was similar to that of the previously reported EAS effect on Mandarin tone recognition. Psychophysical analysis on tactile sensation showed an important role of frequency discrimination in the ETS enhancement.ConclusionTactile stimulation can potentially enhance Mandarin tone recognition in cochlear-implant users who do not have usable residual acoustic hearing. To optimize this potential, high fundamental frequencies need to be transposed to a 100–200 Hz range.

Speech Understanding in Complex Listening Environments by Listeners Fit With Cochlear Implants

The aim of this article is to summarize recent published and unpublished research from our 2 laboratories on improving speech understanding in complex listening environments by listeners fit with cochlear implants (CIs). CI listeners were tested in 2 listening environments. One was a simulation of a restaurant with multiple, diffuse noise sources, and the other was a cocktail party with 2 spatially separated point sources of competing speech. At issue was the value of the following sources of information, or interventions, on speech understanding: (a) visual information, (b) adaptive beamformer microphones and remote microphones, (c) bimodal fittings, that is, a CI and contralateral low-frequency acoustic hearing, (d) hearing preservation fittings, that is, a CI with preserved low-frequency acoustic in the same ear plus low-frequency acoustic hearing in the contralateral ear, and (e) bilateral CIs. A remote microphone provided the largest improvement in speech understanding. Visual information and adaptive beamformers ranked next, while bimodal fittings, bilateral fittings, and hearing preservation provided significant but less benefit than the other interventions or sources of information. Only bilateral CIs allowed listeners high levels of speech understanding when signals were roved over the frontal plane. The evidence supports the use of bilateral CIs and hearing preservation surgery for best speech understanding in complex environments. These fittings, when combined with visual information and microphone technology, should lead to high levels of speech understanding by CI patients in complex listening environments. http://cred.pubs.asha.org/article.aspx?articleid=2601622.

Hearing Preservation in Pediatric Cochlear Implantation.

Currently, there is a paucity of literature evaluating hearing preservation outcomes in children following cochlear implantation. The objective of the current study is to report pediatric hearing preservation results following cochlear implantation with conventional full-length electrodes. Retrospective review (2000-2016). Tertiary referral center. All pediatric patients with a ≤ 75 dB preoperative low-frequency pure tone average (LFPTA; 250-500 Hz average), who underwent cochlear implantation with a conventional length electrode. Cochlear implantation. Complete, partial, minimal, or no hearing preservation following cochlear implantation (Skarzynski et al., 2013); maintenance of functional low frequency hearing (≤85 dB LFPTA). A total of 43 ears, in 35 pediatric patients, met inclusion criteria. The mean age at time of implantation was 8.6 years (range, 1.4-17.8 yr), 20 (57.1%) patients were female, and 25 (58.1%) cases were left-sided.The mean preoperative ipsilateral low frequency PTA and conventional four-frequency PTA (500, 1000, 2000, 3000 Hz average) were 54.2 dB (range, 15-75 dB) and 82.2 dB (range, 25-102.5 dB), respectively. The mean low frequency PTA and conventional four-frequency PTA shifts comparing the pre- and first postoperative audiogram were Δ25.2 dB (range, -5 to 92.5 dB) and Δ18.3 dB (range, -8.8 to 100 dB), respectively. Overall, 17 (39.5%) ears demonstrated complete hearing preservation, 19 (44.2%) ears partial hearing preservation, 0 minimal hearing preservation, and 7 (16.3%) exhibited no measurable acoustic hearing after surgery. In total, 28 (65.1%) ears maintained functional low-frequency hearing (i.e., ≤85 dB LFPTA) based on the initial postoperative audiogram. There was no statistically significant difference in the initial low frequency PTA shift comparing lateral wall and perimodiolar electrodes (Δ22.2 versus Δ28.1 respectively; p = 0.44), cochleostomy and round window insertions (Δ25.2 vs. Δ24.7 respectively; p = 0.95), or statistically significant association between age at implantation and low frequency PTA shift (r = 0.174; p = 0.26).In total, 22 ears in 19 patients had serial audiometric data available for review. Over a mean duration of 43.8 months (range, 2.6-108.3 mo) following surgery, the mean low frequency PTA and conventional four-frequency PTA shift comparing the initial postoperative and most recent postoperative audiogram was Δ9.7 dB (range, -27.5 to 57.5 dB) and Δ8.1 dB (range, -18.8 to 31.9 dB), respectively. Varying levels of hearing preservation with conventional length electrodes can be achieved in most pediatric subjects. In the current study, 82% of patients maintained detectable hearing thresholds and 65% maintained functional low-frequency acoustic hearing. These data may be used to guide preoperative counseling in pediatric patients with residual acoustic hearing. Additionally, the favorable rates of hearing preservation achieved in children provide further evidence for the expansion of pediatric cochlear implant candidacy to include patients with greater degrees of residual hearing.

Hearing Preservation Cochlear Implants: A Review of Potential Mechanisms of Hearing Loss After Implantation

Hearing preservation cochlear implants (CIs) are specifically designed to preserve residual low-frequency acoustic hearing for use together with electrically stimulated high-frequency hearing. This combined electro-acoustic stimulation (EAS) provides a promising treatment option for patients with severe high-frequency hearing loss, but with some residual low-frequency hearing, and has been shown to improve speech perception, especially in background noise, music perception, and sound source localization. Thus, preservation of residual hearing should be a priority in treatment.Although residual low-frequency hearing is successfully preserved to varying degrees in many patients, some patients experience a loss of residual hearing following implantation. A wide range of potential causes of, or contributors to, loss of residual hearing in EAS CI users have been proposed. In this paper, we review the evidence for several of the proposed causes of hearing loss with EAS CI. We conclude that its etiology is likely a multifactorial, heterogeneous phenomenon. Furthermore, we suggest that studies to further elucidate effects of ischemia on lateral wall function and maintenance of endocochlear potential in the context of EAS CI implantation and use are needed.

Experiments on Auditory-Visual Perception of Sentences by Users of Unilateral, Bimodal, and Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Five experiments probed auditory-visual (AV) understanding of sentences by users of cochlear implants (CIs). Sentence material was presented in auditory (A), visual (V), and AV test conditions to listeners with normal hearing and CI users. (a) Most CI users report that most of the time, they have access to both A and V information when listening to speech. (b) CI users did not achieve better scores on a task of speechreading than did listeners with normal hearing. (c) Sentences that are easy to speechread provided 12 percentage points more gain to speech understanding than did sentences that were difficult. (d) Ease of speechreading for sentences is related to phrase familiarity. (e) Users of bimodal CIs benefit from low-frequency acoustic hearing even when V cues are available, and a second CI adds to the benefit of a single CI when V cues are available. (f) V information facilitates lexical segmentation by improving the recognition of the number of syllables produced and the relative strength of these syllables. Our data are consistent with the view that V information improves CI users' ability to identify syllables in the acoustic stream and to recognize their relative juxtaposed strengths. Enhanced syllable resolution allows better identification of word onsets, which, when combined with place-of-articulation information from visible consonants, improves lexical access.