Low-dose Levonorgestrel Intrauterine System Research Articles

Progestogen addition with low-dose levonorgestrel intrauterine system in menopausal hormone treatment gives less normal breast tissue proliferation than oral norethisterone acetate or medroxyprogesterone acetate.

Background The impact of hormones on the development of breast cancer is despite extensive studies, incompletely understood. Combined estrogen-progestogen treatment augments the risk for breast cancer beyond that of estrogen alone, according to numerous studies. The role of breast cell proliferation as a promoter in the development and growth of breast cancer is well recognized. Materials and methods Seventy-nine patients from three randomised trials were subject to a re-analysis of breast cell proliferation: (1) 22 women received continuous combined treatment with oral estradiol (E2) 2 mg/norethisterone acetate (NETA) 1 mg once daily for 3 months. (2) Thirty-seven women received 2 months of sequential treatment with oral conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) 0.625 mg daily combined with medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) 5 mg for 14/28 days of each cycle. (3) Twenty women received oral estradiol-valerate (E2V) 2 mg daily combined with levonorgestrel (LNG) intrauterine system (IUS), 20 μg/24 h for 2 months. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) (studies 1 and 3) and core needle biopsy (CNB) (study 2) were used for the assessment of breast cell proliferation. Results There were no baseline proliferation differences, but at the end of treatment there was a highly significant between-group difference for E2V/LNG IUS versus the other two groups (p = 0.0025). E2/NETA and CEE treatments gave a 4-7-old increase in proliferation during treatment (p = 0.04) and (p = 0.007), respectively, which was absent in the E2V/LNG group, showing a significant correlation with insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) serum levels. Conclusion E2V in combination with very low serum concentrations of LNG in the IUS gives no increase in proliferation in the normal breast.

Intrauterine Progestin Therapy as a New Approach to Premalignant Endometrial Polyps: A Prospective Observational Study.

Endometrial hyperplastic polyps (EHP) may progress to endometrial carcinoma (EC) if left untreated. We aimed to prospectively investigate the efficacy of the low-dose levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) as therapy for EHP with malignant potential. In total, 37 women with EHP underwent therapy with LNG-IUS containing 13.5 mg levonorgestrel for six months or 4-10 weeks depending on whether the EHP was characterized (by D-score analysis) as low- to medium-risk (n=33) or high-risk (n=4) of coexistent or future EC. Therapy response was defined as complete clearance of hyperplastic glands in post-therapy endometrial biopsy. All women with low- to medium-risk EHP obtained therapy response, whereas only 1 out of 4 with high-risk EHP responded to therapy. None of the women were diagnosed with EC during the study and no serious adverse events occurred. Low-dose LNG-IUS represents a promising therapy for selected women with EHP.

A single-arm phase III study exploring the efficacy and safety of LNG-IUS 8, a low-dose levonorgestrel intrauterine contraceptive system (total content 13.5 mg), in an Asia-Pacific population

ObjectiveThe objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a low-dose levonorgestrel intrauterine system with total content 13.5 mg (average approximately 8 μg/24 h over the first year; LNG-IUS 8; Jaydess®) in an Asia-Pacific population. Study designAn open-label, single-arm phase III study conducted at 25 centers in China, Australia and Korea assessed LNG-IUS 8 use over 3 years in nulliparous and parous women (N=1114) aged 18–40 years with regular menstrual cycles (21–35 days). Primary outcome was pregnancy rate, expressed as the Pearl Index. Secondary outcomes included 3-year cumulative failure rate, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), discontinuation rate, bleeding profile and placement pain. ResultsThe full analysis set comprised 925 women (mean age 31.6 years, 6.4% nulliparous). Overall unadjusted Pearl Index was 0.35 (95% confidence interval 0.15–0.70); the 3-year cumulative failure rate was 0.9% (95% confidence interval 0.4–1.9). TEAEs and study drug-related TEAEs were reported in 70.1% and 31.2% of women, respectively. Overall, 27.9% of women discontinued the study, 16.9% due to adverse events. Frequent or prolonged bleeding (World Health Organization criteria) decreased from the first to the twelfth 90-day reference intervals (from 5.0% to 0.7% and from 44.1% to 3.0%, respectively), and the percentage of women with amenorrhea increased over time (from 0.4% to 10.8%). Pain on placement was reported as “none” or “mild” in 91.9% of women. ConclusionsLNG-IUS 8 was an effective and well-tolerated contraceptive method, providing another option for women in the Asia-Pacific region. ImplicationsIn this phase III study, LNG-IUS 8 was shown to be highly effective and well tolerated in an Asia-Pacific population and was not associated with any new or unexpected safety events. LNG-IUS 8 provides another contraceptive option for women in the Asia-Pacific region.

Efficacy and safety of a low-dose levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS12) according to age, parity, and body mass index over 5 years of use

Efficacy and safety of a low-dose levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS12) according to age, parity, and body mass index over 5 years of use

A Phase III, single-arm study of LNG-IUS 8, a low-dose levonorgestrel intrauterine contraceptive system (total content 13.5 mg) in postmenarcheal adolescents

ObjectiveTo assess the safety profile of the low-dose levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) total content 13.5mg (average approximate release rate 8μg/24h over the first year; LNG-IUS 8; Jaydess®) in adolescents. Study designIn a Phase III study in 36 European centers, 304 healthy nulliparous or parous postmenarcheal adolescents (12–17years) received LNG-IUS 8 for 12months. The primary outcome was the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Secondary outcomes included: serious TEAEs, adverse events of special interest, overall user satisfaction, discontinuation rate at 12months, and Pearl Index. ResultsLNG-IUS 8 placement was successful in 303/304 participants (99.7%). Overall, 82.6% of participants reported TEAEs, and serious TEAEs and serious study drug-related TEAEs were reported by 7.6% and 1.0% of participants, respectively. No cases of pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy, or uterine perforation were reported. No pregnancies were reported during the 12-month study. At Month 12/study end, the overall user satisfaction rate was 83.9%. Overall, 51 participants (16.8%) prematurely discontinued the study before 12months; 13.8% of participants discontinued owing to TEAEs. ConclusionsNo new or unexpected safety events were associated with the low-dose LNG-IUS 8. The safety profile of LNG-IUS 8 in adolescents was consistent with that previously reported in adults. The high overall user-satisfaction rate at study end and the low discontinuation rate over 12months demonstrate that LNG-IUS 8 is a highly acceptable contraceptive method among adolescents. ImplicationsThis study is the first to assess the low-dose levonorgestrel intrauterine system LNG-IUS 8 (average approximate release rate 8μg/24h over the first year and total content 13.5mg) specifically in females<18years of age and confirms the safety and efficacy of LNG-IUS 8 in an adolescent population.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) 13.5 mg in contraception

BackgroundLevonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) 13.5 mg (total content) is a low-dose levonorgestrel intrauterine system for up to 3 years of use. This analysis evaluated the cost-effectiveness of LNG-IUS 13.5 mg in comparison with short-acting reversible contraceptive (SARC) methods in a cohort of young women in the United States from a third-party payer's perspective. Study designA state transition model consisting of three mutually exclusive health states — initial method, unintended pregnancy (UP) and subsequent method — was developed. Cost-effectiveness of LNG-IUS 13.5 mg was assessed vs. SARC methods in a cohort of 1000 women aged 20–29 years. SARC methods comprise oral contraceptives (OC), ring, patch and injections, which are the methods commonly used by this cohort. Failure and discontinuation probabilities were based on published literature, contraceptive uptake was determined by the most recent data from the National Survey of Family Growth, and costs were taken from standard US databases. One-way sensitivity analysis was conducted around key inputs, while scenario analysis assessed a comparison between LNG-IUS 13.5 mg and the existing IUS, LNG-IUS 20 mcg/24 h. The key model output was cost per UP avoided. ResultsCompared to SARC methods, initiating contraception with LNG-IUS 13.5 mg resulted in fewer UP (64 UP vs. 276 UP) and lower total costs ($1,283,479 USD vs. $1,862,633 USD, a 31% saving) over the 3-year time horizon. Results were most sensitive to the probability of failure on OC, the probability of LNG-IUS 13.5 mg discontinuation and the cost of live births. Scenario analysis suggests that further cost savings may be generated with the initiation of LNG-IUS 20 mcg/24 h in place of SARC methods. ConclusionsFrom a third-party payer perspective, LNG-IUS 13.5 mg is a more cost-effective contraceptive option than SARC. Therefore, women switching from current SARC use to LNG-IUS 13.5 mg are likely to generate cost savings to third-party health care payers, driven principally by decreased UP-related expenditures and long-term savings in contraceptive costs.

Return to fertility after removal of two low-dose levonorgestrel intrauterine systems (LNG-IUS): results from a global, randomized, phase III study

Return to fertility after removal of two low-dose levonorgestrel intrauterine systems (LNG-IUS): results from a global, randomized, phase III study

A multicenter, randomized, phase III study of two low-dose levonorgestrel intrauterine systems (LNG-IUSs) for contraception: a subgroup analyses of efficacy and safety in nulliparous versus parous women

A multicenter, randomized, phase III study of two low-dose levonorgestrel intrauterine systems (LNG-IUSs) for contraception: a subgroup analyses of efficacy and safety in nulliparous versus parous women