Abstract Background Several randomized trials have indicated a benefit from endovascular therapy in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients. In some centers, interventional cardiologists with previous large carotid stenting experience can play significant role for this treatment. Objectives We present retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of endovascular treatment of stroke (EVTS) performed by interventional cardiologists in collaboration with neurologists in 46 patients in single center. Methods Between 2014 and 2017 46 consecutive AIS patients underwent EVT, men 69.7% (7 with posterior circulation stroke and 5 with wake-up stroke), with mean age 64.6±13 years and average National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of 12.2±5 at presentation. During the same period of time 20 patients, 16 men, at mean age 69.4±12, and NIHSS score 11.8±7 received IVT. In the EVT group two methods were applied: Method 1, Supraselective intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) alone or IAT plus balloon angioplasty (PBA); Method 2, Aspiration with Penumbra aspiration system (PAS) or Combination of PAS plus low dose IAT. Results The mean symptoms onset-to-treatment (needle) time (ONT) in the EVT group was 221.7±121.5 minutes, and 185.5±34.9 in the IVT group (p=0.19T). Conscious sedation and local anesthesia was used in 84.7% of the patients (40), general anesthesia in 15.2%; preprocedural MRI was performed in 58.7% and CT in 71.7% of the patients. In the EVT group successful reperfusion (TICI 2b-3 flow) was achieved in 35 (76.1%) patients: in 73.9% with Method 1 and in 86.7% with Method 2 (p=0.44). Poor or no recanalization (TICI 0–1-2a) was observed in 26.1%. Twenty six of 46 patients (56.5%) treated with endovascular methods and respectively 9 (45%) with IVT demonstrated favorable clinical outcome of mRS score 0–2 at 90 days (p=0.91). The overall 3-month mortality was 15.2%, 13% after EVT and 20% after IVT (p=0.48). Conclusions Our initial experience with EVT of AIS performed by trained cardiologists with carotid experience is encouraging, with a relatively moderate to high rate of successful angiographic recanalization and good clinical results. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None