Low-dose Computed Tomography Screening Research Articles

Blood microRNA testing in participants with suspicious low-dose CT findings: follow-up of the BioMILD lung cancer screening trial

The proper management of suspicious radiologic findings is crucial to optimize the effectiveness of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer screening trials. In the BioMILD study, we evaluated the utility of combining a plasma 24-microRNA signature classifier (MSC) and LDCT to define the individual risk and personalize screening strategies. Here we aim to assess the utility of repeated MSC testing during annual screening rounds in 1024 participants with suspicious LDCT findings. The primary outcome was two-year lung cancer incidence in relation to MSC test results, reported as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Lung cancer incidence and mortality were estimated using extended Cox models for time-dependent covariates, yielding the respective hazard ratios (HR). Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT02247453. With a median follow-up of 8.5 years, the full study set included 1403 indeterminate LDCT (CTind) and 584 positive LDCT (CT+) results. A lung cancer RR increase in MSC+compared to MSC- participants was observed in both the CTind (RR: 2.5; 95% CI: 1.4-4.32) and CT+ (RR: 2.6; 95% CI: 1.81-3.74) groups and was maintained when considering stage I or resectable tumors only. A 98% negative predictive value in CTind/MSC- and a 30% positive predictive value in CT+/MSC+ lesions were recorded. At seven years' follow-up, MSC+ participants had a cumulative HR of 4.4 (95% CI: 3.0-6.4) for lung cancer incidence and of 8.1 (95% CI: 2.7-24.5) for lung cancer mortality. Our study shows that MSC can be reliably performed during LDCT screening rounds to increase the accuracy of lung cancer risk and mortality prediction and supports its clinical utility in the management of LDCT findings of uncertain malignancy. Italian Association for Cancer Research; Italian Ministry of Health; Horizon2020; National Cancer Institute (NCI); Gensignia LifeScience.

Overdiagnosis of lung cancer in Chinese populations

Abstract Background Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) has been widely-used in employee health examinations in China since 2011. This study was designed based on the Cancer Surveillance data to quantify the overdiagnosis of lung cancer due to the introduction of LDCT in Chinese populations. Methods This registry-based cohort study included 46,978 incident cases and 34,475 deaths of lung cancer from Pudong New Area of Shanghai, China, during 2002-2020. We calculated the age-standardized rates (ASR) and average annual changes (AAC) of mortality and overall, stage-specific and histological type-specific incidence by sex to evaluate the potential overdiagnosis of lung cancer. We further estimated the numbers and proportions of lung cancer cases attributable to overdiagnosis by sex and period based on the comparison between the shape of the age-specific curves with that prior to the introduction of LDCT in the populations. Results The ASR of incidence of lung cancer increased rapidly since 2011 in both men (AAC: 1.90%; 95%CI: 0.87, 2.92) and women (AAC: 4.40%; 95%CI: 3.19, 5.62), whereas the ASR of mortality declined persistently, with AAC of -0.12% (-0.64, 0.39) in men and -0.19% (-0.47, 0.09) in women. The upward trends in incidence were mainly observed in women, for early-stage cancer and for lung adenocarcinoma. Overall, the overdiagnosis rate of lung cancer grew from 22% in 2011-2015 to 50% in 2016-2020 in women. Further analysis demonstrated elevated numbers (proportions) of lung adenocarcinoma cases attributable to overdiagnosis, which increased from 182 (8%) in 2011-2015 to 827(22%) in 2016-2020 in men, and from 1,842 (85%) to 4,171 (89%) in women. Conclusions This registry-based cohort study observed considerable and increasing overdiagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma in Chinese men and women. Guideline is urgently needed to maximize the benefits of LDCT screening and reduce the potential overdiagnosis of lung cancer in the populations. Key messages • The secular trends in incidence and mortality of lung cancer in Chinese populations demonstrated the overdiagnosis since 2011, when the LDCT was used as a part of staff health examination in China. • Overdiagnosis of lung cancer in Chinese populations increased incrementally over time and was mainly observed among women.

Cross-sectional study of assessment of lung cancer (LC) screening awareness in an underserved community in the Bronx, New York.

155 Background: LC remains the second most diagnosed cancer but is the leading cause of cancer death in the USA, accounting for 21% of all cancer deaths. Despite advances in screening and treatment, it remains the principal cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Notably, survival rates have improved from 21% to 25% over the past 5 years. However, LC screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) is underutilized, with only 5.8% of eligible individuals screened in 2021. Methods: A prospective 29-question survey was conducted at St. Barnabas Health Care System in the Bronx, NY, from February to April 2024. The survey included patients aged 50-80, both former and active smokers. Data on demographics, social determinants, and knowledge of LC and LDCT screening were collected and processed using JASP Version 0.18.3. The study aimed to assess the community's knowledge of lung cancer screening, with demographic characteristics as secondary outcomes. Results: From all the surveys collected, 115 met the inclusion criteria, 53% male (61) and 47% female (54), with no significant difference between proportions (p=0.576). The median age was 63 years. Race: 73% were Hispanic, 22% Black, and 5% White, with significant differences from an equal distribution (p< 0.001). Legal Status, citizens (74%), followed by green card holders (17%). Most of the patients lived in the USA for over 20 years (90%), with very few having lived for less than five years (1%), indicating a long-term residency trend (p < 0.001). Education Level: high school education was the most common (58%), followed by middle school (17%) and elementary school (15%). Doctorate and graduate degrees were less common (7%). 91% of patients were aware of the relationship between cigarette smoking and LC, while 9% did not (p<0.001). On the other hand, 66% believed there was a relationship between e-cigarette use and LC, while 44% believed there was not. Patients with an income greater than $50,000 have significantly more knowledge of the screening tool for LC (STLC), as indicated by a Chi-square value of 50.87 (p < 0.05, with a critical value of 5.99). Patients with low education levels have less knowledge of the existing STLC, with a Chi-square of 143.587 (p<0.05 and a critical value of 9.488). Conclusions: Our study highlights critical disparities in LC awareness and knowledge of screening tools among different demographic groups. There is a clear need for targeted educational initiatives, especially for lower-income and less-educated populations, to improve understanding of LC risks associated with both traditional and electronic cigarette use. The significant presence of long-term Hispanic residents suggests that culturally tailored interventions could be particularly effective. Addressing these gaps is essential for enhancing lung cancer prevention and early detection efforts across diverse communities.

Large cell carcinoma of the lung: LDCT features and survival in screen-detected cases.

To investigate the early radiological features and survival of Large Cell Carcinoma (LCC) cases diagnosed in low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening trials. Two radiologists jointly reviewed the radiological features of screen-detected LCCs observed in NLST, ITALUNG, and LUSI trials between 2002 and 2016, comprising a total of 29,744 subjects who underwent 3-5 annual screening LDCT examinations. Survival or causes of death were established according to the mortality registries extending more than 12years since randomization. LCC was diagnosed in 30 (4%) of 750 subjects with screen-detected lung cancer (LC), including 15 prevalent and 15 incident cases. Three additional LCCs occurred as interval cancers during the screening period. LDCT images were available for 29 cases of screen-detected LCCs, and 28 showed a single, peripheral, and well-defined solid nodule or mass with regularly smooth (39%), lobulated (43%), or spiculated (18%) margins. One case presented as hilar mass. In 9 incident LCCs, smaller solid nodules were identified in prior LDCT examinations, allowing us to calculate a mean Volume Doubling Time (VDT) of 98.7±47.8 days. The overall five-year survival rate was 50%, with a significant (p=0.0001) difference between stages I-II (75% alive) and stages III-IV (10% alive). LCC is a fast-growing neoplasm that can escape detection by annual LDCT screening. LCC typically presents as a single solid peripheral nodule or mass, often with lobulated margins, and exhibits a short VDT. The 5-year survival reflects the stage at diagnosis.

P4.04C.08 Sensitivity of Artificial Intelligence in Low-dose Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer

P4.04C.08 Sensitivity of Artificial Intelligence in Low-dose Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer

Lung Nodule Management in Low-Dose CT Screening for Lung Cancer: Lessons from the NELSON Trial.

Screening with low-dose CT (LDCT) in a high-risk population, as defined by age and smoking behavior, reduces lung cancer-related mortality. However, LDCT screening presents a major challenge. Numerous, mostly benign, nodules are seen in the lungs during screening. The question is how to distinguish the malignant from the benign nodules. Various studies use different protocols for nodule management. The Dutch-Belgian NELSON (Nederlands-Leuvens Longkanker Screenings Onderzoek) trial, the largest European lung cancer screening trial, used distinctions based on nodule volumetric assessment and growth rate. This review discusses key findings from the NELSON study regarding the characteristics of screening-detected nodules, including nodule size and its volumetric assessment, growth rate, subtype, and their associated malignancy risk. These results are compared with findings from other screening studies and current recommendations for lung nodule management. By examining differences in nodule management strategies and providing a comprehensive overview of outcomes specific to lung cancer screening, this review aims to contribute to the broader discussion on optimizing lung nodule management in screening programs.

Does low-dose CT screening save lives in lung cancer?

Does low-dose CT screening save lives in lung cancer?

EP.04A.11 Patients Reported Outcomes in Short- And Long-Term Lung Cancer Survivors Who Were Diagnosed via Chest Low-Dose CT Screening

EP.04A.11 Patients Reported Outcomes in Short- And Long-Term Lung Cancer Survivors Who Were Diagnosed via Chest Low-Dose CT Screening

Perceptions and Interest in Lung Cancer Screening by Smoking Status: A Cross-Sectional Study of HINTS 6 (2022).

Lung cancer screening guidelines prioritize individuals with a history of smoking due to their higher risk of the disease. Our study examines the awareness and interest in low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer screening among different smoking statuses using data from the National Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 6 (2022). We analyzed data from HINTS 6, including 3915 participants on smoking status, LDCT screening, and telehealth use. Participants were categorized as current smokers, former smokers, and non-smokers. Current smokers had the highest likelihood of being recommended for LDCT screening (OR: 7.1, aOR: 10.4) compared with non-smokers. Former smokers also had increased odds of screening recommendations (OR: 3.1, aOR: 3.4) than non-smokers. Despite higher screening recommendations, current smokers exhibited significantly lower interest in cancer screening (interest rating score: 2.1) compared with non-smokers (interest rating score: 2.4) and former smokers (interest rating score: 2.5). Current smokers rated their telehealth care experiences more positively in terms of care quality compared with non-smokers. Our findings underscore a gap in cancer screening interest among current smokers despite their higher likelihood of being recommended for LDCT screening. The favorable perception of telehealth among current smokers provides an opportunity to enhance engagement and promote LDCT scan through telehealth care.

Abstract A132: Missed Opportunities? Regional availability of Low Dose CT lung cancer screening facility locations in the year prior to diagnoses: A descriptive comparison of American Indian and Non-Hispanic White lung cancer patients in North Carolina

Abstract INTRODUCTION American Indians (AI) have much higher incidence rates of lung cancer (LC) compared with non-Hispanic Whites (NHW) in the US. While low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening facilitates early detection of lung cancer, it is unknown how available LDCT screenings are to racially and geographically diverse populations in North Carolina (NC). To address this gap in knowledge, we conducted a descriptive study to characterize incident LC cases among AIs and NHWs, the distance from their location at diagnosis to the nearest LDCT screening facility and explored whether distance was associated with late-stage LC diagnoses. Methods Data were obtained from the Cancer Information and Population Health Resource (CIPHR), which comprise data from NC Central Cancer Registry (CCR) as well as public and private health insurance claims for the state. We identified ZIP codes and dates of rendered service for facilities providing LDCT by searching through claims from 2015-20. In addition, we identified incident LC cases among AIs and NHWs aged ≥18 years, from 2015-19. We assembled lists of LDCT facilities that existed in the year prior to each incident LC case. We calculated the minimum centroid to centroid distance to all facilities. Clinical attributes included age at diagnosis, sex, histology, stage at diagnosis, and rurality as measured by Rural Urban Commuting Area. Risk ratios were calculated for late-stage LC diagnoses across a range of thresholds for patient’s distance to nearest LDCT screening facility for AIs and NHWs. Results We identified 388 AI and 26,867 NHW incident LC cases in NC between 2015-20. Compared to NHWs, the median age at diagnosis for AIs was 5 years younger (AI: 65 vs. NHW: 69); more frequently male (AI: 54% vs NHW: 51%); and almost twice as likely to reside in rural areas (AI: 52% vs. NHW: 28%). There were no differences in late-stage LC diagnoses (AI: 54% vs. NHW: 52%). For distance (in miles) to the nearest LDCT screening facility, the median [Interquartile range] was twice as high for AIs (9.9 miles [0.8, 16.30]) compared to NHWs (5.3 miles [0, 12.1]). Among NHWs, there were statistically significant associations between distance and late-stage LC diagnosis at the shortest distance threshold of 5 miles (RR=1.04; 95%CL: 1.02, 1.07) through the threshold of 30 miles (RR=1.10 95%CL: 1.05, 1.15). There was no association across any distance threshold among AI lung cancer patients. Conclusions The large difference in accessibility of LDCT screening was not strongly associated with metastatic lung cancer diagnoses, possibly because so many patients were diagnosed late, reflecting poor early detection across all populations. We found that 80% of AIs with LC lived more than 10 miles away from LDCT screening facilities. This geographic distance may increase difficulty accessing cancer care geographically, and contribute to suboptimal LC screening rates. If efforts are to be made to increase early detection and improve survival, accessibility needs to be addressed on different dimensions. Citation Format: Bradford E. Jackson, Marc Emerson, Daniel Carrizosa, Chris Baggett, Lisa Spees, Joel Begay, Ana Salas, Yadurshirni Raveendran, Tomi Akinyemiju, Rachel Denlinger-Apte, Stephanie Wheeler, Ronny Bell. Missed Opportunities? Regional availability of Low Dose CT lung cancer screening facility locations in the year prior to diagnoses: A descriptive comparison of American Indian and Non-Hispanic White lung cancer patients in North Carolina [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr A132.

Abstract B046: Factors influencing patient decision-making to complete Low Dose CT screening for lung cancer

Abstract As part of a randomized, controlled trial (RCT) to increase lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose CT scan (LDCT) within the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma’s tribal health system, we conducted a qualitative study to explore the barriers behind patient decisions to forego screening. Thirty eligible participants who had been in the RCT for at least one year were identified as LCS completers (n=7) or non-completers (n=23). A single interviewer completed all interviews using a semi-structured interview guide, designed to explore experiences, barriers/facilitators to LCS, factors influencing screening decisions, and suggested strategies for expanding the LCS program into the community. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed using conventional content analysis. Most non-completers reported having no conversations about the availability of LCS with their primary care provider (PCP) or receiving any information about the LCS program. In contrast, the completers all reported PCP-initiated discussions about the LCS program, their risk factors, and an overview of the testing process. Key themes that emerged included fears, e.g., being unsure about what the test involves, afraid of being diagnosed with lung cancer and what might follow, and afraid of dying. Some voiced concerns, e.g., feeling guilty as active smokers and being stigmatized should they be diagnosed with lung cancer. Many participants posited that there was no reason for screening without symptoms. Lack of understanding, especially about cancer care, was identified as a contributing factor. Suggested strategies to increase the reach into the community included using existing infrastructure within Choctaw Nation, such as disseminating information through the tribal newsletter, inserts in prescription refills, and notifications via the patient portal. Community education programs at local community centers, particularly around senior citizen meals, were offered as strategies to change the perception that lung cancer is a death sentence. Hosting an informational booth at the annual tribal Labor Day festival was commonly suggested. In conclusion, multiple reasons were cited for forgoing LDCT screening. In this tribal setting, findings are similar to ones documented in other settings. This suggests that interventions to overcome these challenges may build off known evidence-based interventions, such as the recommendations for cancer prevention documented by the Community Preventive Services Task Force. Addressing fears through multiple educational approaches and adapting strategies from the American Lung Association to address stigma could lead to enhanced interventions. Finally, capitalizing on tribal resources (newsletter) and tribal events to increase LCS awareness may be promising strategies to improve screening in the local tribal setting. Citation Format: Kathleen Dwyer, Zsolt Nagykaldi, Mark Doescher, Dorothy A. Rhoades. Factors influencing patient decision-making to complete Low Dose CT screening for lung cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr B046.

Repeated CT scans on 12,984 Asians to diagnose lung cancer once it is suspected.

In Taiwan, lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related fatalities, resulting in substantial healthcare expenses. This research aims to evaluate both the frequency and the costs of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) in individuals suspected of having lung cancer until their diagnosis of cancer. LDCT screening was not conducted on a population-wide scale, and asymptomatic participants had to cover the expenses for the screening personally or reimburse from other sources. If the screening results were positive or suspicious, National Health Insurance (NHI) could be utilized for subsequent follow-up examinations. This cohort study utilized the NHI Database and focused on individuals with suspected cases of lung cancer identified between 2010 and 2014.A total of 17,572 suspected new lung cancer cases were initially identified and assigned to the relevant International Classification of Diseases codes. Individuals with suspected lung cancer received a diagnosis following an average follow-up period of 2.24 (95%CI, 2.11-2.37) years, and required the use of 2.36 (95%CI, 2.20-2.51) repeated CT scans. The NHI expenditures incurred by the use of CT scans for monitoring suspected lung cancer cases were relatively modest.

Assessing Bronchiectasis Progression in Low-dose Screening for Lung Cancer: Frequency and Predictors.

Bronchiectasis is associated with loss of lung function, substantial use of health care resources, and increased morbidity and mortality in people with cardiopulmonary diseases. We assessed the frequency of progression or new development of bronchiectasis and predictors of progression in participants in low-dose computed tomography (CT) screening programs. We reviewed our prospectively enrolled screening cohort in the Early Lung and Cardiac Action Program cohort of smokers, aged 40 to 90, between 2010 and 2019, and medical records to assess the progression of bronchiectasis after five or more years of follow-up after baseline low-dose CT. Logistic and multivariate-analysis-of-covariance regression analyses were used to examine factors associated with bronchiectasis progression. Among 2182 baseline screening participants, we identified 534 (mean age: 65±9y; 53.6% women) with follow-up screening of 5+ years (median follow-up: 103.2mo). Of the 534 participants, 34 (6.4%) participants had progressed (25/126, 19.8%) or newly developed (9/408, 2.2%) bronchiectasis. Significant predictors of progression (progressed+newly developed) were: age (P=0.03), pack-years of smoking (P=0.004), baseline components of the ELCAP Bronchiectasis Score, including the severity of bronchial dilatation (P=0.01), its extent (P=0.01), bronchial wall thickening (P=0.04), and mucoid impaction (P<0.001). Assuming similar progression rates, ~136 out of 2182 participants are expected to progress on follow-up screening. This study sheds light on bronchiectasis progression and its significant predictors in a low-dose CT screening program. We recommend reporting bronchiectasis as participants who have smoked are at increased risk, and continued assessment over the entire period of participation in the low-dose CT screening program would allow for the identification of possible causes, early warning, and even early treatment.

The Azygos Esophageal Recess Is Not to Be Missed in Screening Lung Cancer With LDCT.

Lesion overlooking and late diagnostic workup can compromise the efficacy of low-dose CT (LDCT) screening of lung cancer (LC), implying more advanced and less curable disease stages. We hypothesized that the azygos esophageal recess (AER) of the right lower lobe (RLL) might be an area prone to lesion overlooking in LC screening. Two radiologists reviewed the LDCT examinations of all the screen-detected incident LCs observed in the active arm of 2 randomized clinical trials: ITALUNG and national lung screening trial. Those in the AER were compared with those in the remainder of the RLL for possible differences in diagnostic lag according to the Lung-RADS 1.1 recommendations, size, stage, and mortality. Six (11.7%) of 51 screen-detected incident LCs of the RLL were located in the AER. The diagnostic lag time was significantly longer (P=0.046) in the AER LC (mean 14±9mo) than in the LC in the remaining RLL (mean 7.3±1mo). Size and stage at diagnosis were not significantly different. All 6 subjects with LC in the AER and 16 (35.5%) of 45 subjects with LC in the remaining RLL (P=0.004) died of LC after a median follow-up of 12 years. Our retrospective study indicates that AER might represent a lung region of the RLL prone to have early LC overlooked due to detection or interpretation errors with possible detrimental consequences for the subject undergoing LC screening.

Lung cancer screening in never smokers.

Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer screening has been established in smokers, but its role in never smokers remains unclear. The differences in lung cancer biology between smokers and nonsmokers highlight the importance of a discriminated approach. This overview focuses on the emerging data and implementation challenges for LDCT screening in nonsmokers. The first LDCT screening study in nonsmokers enriched with risk factors demonstrated a lung cancer detection rate double that of the phase 3 trials in smokers. The relative risk of lung cancer detected by LDCT has also been found to be similar amongst female never smokers and male ever smokers in Asia. Majority of lung cancers detected through LDCT screening are stage 0/1, leading to concerns of overdiagnosis. Risk prediction models to enhance individual selection and nodule management could be useful to enhance the utility of LDCT screening in never smokers. With appropriate risk stratification, LDCT screening in never smokers may attain similar efficacy as compared to smokers. A global effort is needed to generate evidence surrounding optimal screening strategies, as well as health and economic benefits to determine the suitability of widespread implementation.

Gender-specific outcomes of low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer detection: A retrospective study in Chinese never-smoker population.

Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) has emerged as a pivotal tool for detecting lung cancer among ever-smokers. This study aims to evaluate the gender-specific outcomes of LDCT screening within the Chinese never-smoking population. We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study, which analyzed LDCT screening outcomes for 42,018 asymptomatic participants. Specifically, we focused on assessing gender-specific differences in the prevalence of pulmonary nodules, and the incidence of lung cancer diagnosis among never-smokers. Among the 42,018 eligible participants, 41.50% were females and 58.50% were males. Most participants were non-smokers (77.57%), with a significantly higher proportion of non-smokers among females than males (99.33% vs. 62.14%). Pulmonary nodules were identified in 2.66% of participants, with a higher prevalence in females (2.99%) than males (2.43%) (p < 0.001). Non-smoking females had a higher incidence of positive nodules than non-smoking males (2.98% vs. 2.38%, p < 0.001). Invasive biopsies were performed in 334 individuals with nodules, confirming lung cancer in 258 cases. The majority of these cancer cases were non-smokers (212), with non-smoking females showing a higher incidence (0.85%) compared to males (0.43%) (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the false-positive rates between non-smoking females (0.14%) and males (0.13%). Multivariate analysis showed that never-smoking women were more likely to undergo biopsies (OR 1.65, p = 0.0016) and had a higher, though not statistically significant, probability of lung cancer diagnosis (OR 1.84, p = 0.06). This study elucidates sex-based differences within the Chinese population, revealing a higher prevalence of pulmonary nodules and lung cancers among non-smoking females. These findings offer valuable reference for both clinical practice and future research initiatives.

Real-world first round results from a charity lung cancer screening program in East Asia.

Screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) has been proven to potentially reduce the rate of mortality of lung cancer. Lack of real-world data outside of protocolized trials has been cited as an impediment to its more widespread implementation, especially in Asia. This report aims to provide such real-world data. A single round of LDCT was provided through a community-based charity program in Hong Kong, China to asymptomatic adults with a family history of lung cancer and/or smoking history. Anonymized data from this program were analyzed. LDCT was performed for 99 participants, including 98 (99%) who had one or more family members with history of lung cancer, and 70 (71%) who were never-smokers. After a single round of screening, a positive LDCT was noted in 47 participants (47%). A sister with a history of lung cancer (28% vs. 8%, P=0.01) and a multiplex family (MF) (47% vs. 23%, P=0.02) were factors associated with a positive LDCT. After a median period of 10 months (range, 5-16 months) following LDCT, lung cancer (all adenocarcinoma) was diagnosed as a direct consequence of positive LDCT findings in six participants (6%), of whom four had stage I disease and five received surgery with curative intent. In the 47 participants with a positive LDCT, having a sister with a history of lung cancer was associated with an increased risk of lung cancer (relative risk =5.23; 95% confidence interval: 1.09-25.21). Detected lesions categorized as Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) 3 or above (odds ratio =12.08; 95% confidence interval: 1.27-114.64) or deemed by an experienced specialist to be suspicious (odds ratio =63.33; 95% confidence interval: 5.48-732.29) were significantly more likely to turn out to be a lung cancer. This real-world data demonstrates that a single round of LDCT screening at a community level in East Asia can detect potentially curable lung cancer at a rate comparable to those reported by protocolized trials. When considering future LDCT screening programs in East Asia, a family history of lung cancer may be a key factor indicating a person for screening, and how features of a LDCT-detected lesion should trigger further intervention warrant further definition.

Application of artificial intelligence in lung cancer screening: A real-world study in a Chinese physical examination population.

With the rapid increase of chest computed tomography (CT) images, the workload faced by radiologists has increased dramatically. It is undeniable that the use of artificial intelligence (AI) image-assisted diagnosis system in clinical treatment is a major trend in medical development. Therefore, in order to explore the value and diagnostic accuracy of the current AI system in clinical application, we aim to compare the detection and differentiation of benign and malignant pulmonary nodules between AI system and physicians, so as to provide a theoretical basis for clinical application. Our study encompassed a cohort of 23 336 patients who underwent chest low-dose spiral CT screening for lung cancer at the Health Management Center of West China Hospital. We conducted a comparative analysis between AI-assisted reading and manual interpretation, focusing on the detection and differentiation of benign and malignant pulmonary nodules. The AI-assisted reading exhibited a significantly higher screening positive rate and probability of diagnosing malignant pulmonary nodules compared with manual interpretation (p < 0.001). Moreover, AI scanning demonstrated a markedly superior detection rate of malignant pulmonary nodules compared with manual scanning (97.2% vs. 86.4%, p < 0.001). Additionally, the lung cancer detection rate was substantially higher in the AI reading group compared with the manual reading group (98.9% vs. 90.3%, p < 0.001). Our findings underscore the superior screening positive rate and lung cancer detection rate achieved through AI-assisted reading compared with manual interpretation. Thus, AI exhibits considerable potential as an adjunctive tool in lung cancer screening within clinical practice settings.

Integrating cardiovascular risk assessment into mobile low-dose CT lung screenings in rural Appalachia: A comprehensive analysis of the relationship between lung cancer risk, coronary artery calcium burden, and cardiovascular risk reduction strategies

ObjectiveMobile low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung screenings are part of an outreach program in rural Appalachia to detect early lung cancer. Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring on LDCT can identify calcium deposits in coronary arteries and can prompt consideration of risk modification for prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. It is not known if Lung CT Screening Reporting & Data System (Lung-RADS) scoring correlates with CAC scores. There is no clear guidance for patients undergoing LDCT screenings to receive follow-up regarding CAC or prevention of associated CVD risk. MethodsThis was a retrospective review of mobile LDCT LCS in adults with no known history of CVD. CT images were obtained at 100 kVp with a slice thickness of 3 mm. Agatston CAC scoring was performed retroactively. Lung-RADS scores were categorized as: Negative (1), Benign (2), Probably Benign (3), and Suspicious (4). CAC scoring was grouped as 0, 1–100, 101–399, and ≥400. Descriptive statistics and chi-square analyses were utilized. ResultsA total of 526 LDCT screenings were included. Over 54 % of patients had coronary calcification on LDCT LCS. 161 patients (30.6 %) had a CAC score of ≥100 and 75 patients (14.3 %) had a CAC score ≥400. Of patients with a CAC score ≥100, 7.5 % received referrals for follow-up after the LDCT screen and 9.3 % had additional cardiac testing. Of those with a CAC score ≥100 not already on a statin (45.3 %) and not already on aspirin (63.3 %), few were started within 3 months of LDCT for prevention (8.2 % and 5.9 % respectively). Among patients with a Lung-RADS score of 4, 17 % had a CAC score >400, whereas only 12 % with a Lung-RADS score of 1 fell into the same CAC category. Higher Lung-RADS scores correlated with fewer patients with CAC of 0. A significant correlation was observed between higher Lung-RADS scores and elevated CAC scores (p = 0.02). ConclusionIn patients with no CVD history, coronary artery calcification was frequently identified on mobile LDCT lung screenings in rural communities. Patients with higher probabilities of malignant lung nodules may also be at increased risk for significant coronary artery disease. Calcium scoring from LDCT screenings allowed for simultaneous assessment of lung cancer and CVD risk. Unfortunately, few referrals or CVD prevention medications were initiated. Awareness of CAC score utility, follow-up for identified coronary calcifications, and consideration of primary prevention medications when indicated, would be beneficial in patients undergoing LDCT lung screenings, especially in rural areas with limited healthcare access.

Cost-Effectiveness of Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screenings for Lung Cancer in High-Risk Populations: A Markov Model.

Domestic and foreign studies on lung cancer have been oriented to the medical efficacy of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT), but there is a lack of studies on the costs, value and cost-effectiveness of the treatment. There is a scarcity of conclusive evidence regarding the cost-effectiveness of LDCT within the specific context of Taiwan. This study is designed to address this gap by conducting a comprehensive analysis of the cost-effectiveness of LDCT and chest X-ray (CXR) as screening methods for lung cancer. Markov decision model simulation was used to estimate the cost-effectiveness of biennial screening with LDCT and CXR based on a health provider perspective. Inputs are based on probabilities, health status utility (quality-adjusted life years (QALYs)), costs of lung cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment from the literatures, and expert opinion. A total of 1,000 simulations and five cycles of Markov bootstrapping simulations were performed to compare the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) of these two screening strategies. Probability and one-way sensitivity analyses were also performed. The ICUR of early lung cancer screening compared LDCT to CXR is $-24,757.65/QALYs, and 100% of the probability agree to adopt it under a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of the Taiwan gross domestic product (GDP) per capita ($35,513). The one-way sensitivity analysis also showed that ICUR depends heavily on recall rate. Based on the prevalence rate of 39.7 lung cancer cases per 100,000 people in 2020, it could be estimated that LDCT screening for high-risk populations could save $17,154,115. LDCT can detect more early lung cancers, reduce mortality and is cost-saving than CXR in a long-term simulation of Taiwan's healthcare system. This study provides valuable insights for healthcare decision-makers and suggests analyzing cost-effectiveness for additional variables in future research.