Low-dose Angiotensin-converting Enzyme Inhibitor Research Articles

Impact of acute kidney injury in patients prescribed angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors over the first two years of life.

The association of long-term acute kidney injury (AKI) risk with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor use in neonates/infants is poorly understood. We examined this association to identify potential AKI risk factors. We retrospectively evaluated 119 children aged < 2years (72 boys; median age, 5.0months) who received ACE inhibitors for congenital heart disease for ≥ 6months between January 2009 and June 2019. We monitored the occurrence of AKI, defined according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes guidelines. Demographic and clinical data were extracted from medical records. Risk factors associated with AKI onset were identified by a Cox proportional hazards regression analysis of variables previously identified as risk factors of AKI and those significant in a univariate analysis. Thirty-three of 119 patients (28%) developed AKI at a median follow-up of 1.3years (interquartile range, 0.8-3.2years). AKI incidence was 1257 events per 10,000 patient-years. Concomitant tolvaptan use (hazard ratio [HR], 3.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.82-7.97; P < 0.01) and Down syndrome (HR, 3.22; 95% CI, 1.43-7.29; P < 0.01) were identified as independent risk factors of AKI onset. AKI was strongly associated with concomitant tolvaptan use and Down syndrome in our study population. Physicians should consider these factors when prescribing ACE inhibitors for neonates/infants. Low-dose ACE inhibitors slow CKD progression because of their antifibrotic properties. ACE inhibitors may be beneficial for patients with Down syndrome who have underlying CKD in a non-acute setting. Therefore, they should be administered to such patients with caution.

High-dose versus low-dose angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis

ObjectiveTo systematically review evidence comparing the effect of low-dose versus high-dose ACE inhibitors (ACEIs) on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and hospitalisation, functional capacity and side effects in patients with heart...

The Effect of ACE Inhibitor on the Quality of Life amongst Patients with Cancer Cachexia.

Background:ACEI (Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors) inhibits tumor growth and development. Different mechanisms have been proposed for this matter, including the inhibition of enzymes that are involved in extracellular matrix degradation, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) and etc. The present study was designed with the aim to investigate the effects of low dose ACEI on the Quality of Life (QoL) of non-hospitalized gastric cancer patients with cachexia.Materials and Methods:This study was a single-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial conducted in clinics affiliated with Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS). All participants were patients with gastric cancer in cancer cachexia step aged 40-80 years old who had referred to our clinics from October 2013 to April 2014. In the intervention group, patients were assigned to receive ACEI (Captopril) and the placebo group served as control and received placebo during the same time course. They were asked questions in order to fill out QLQ-C30 (Persian Version) questionnaire 3 times; baseline, 1 and 2 months after their first visit. Results:The mean age of patients was 60.55 ± 12.07 (range 31-80) years and the mean BMI of the patients was 17.21 ± 2.31. In the ACEI group, physical functioning and fatigue score changes were significant 1 and 2 months after treatment. The mean of fatigue score decreased significantly in the placebo group. Overall, global health status scores significantly increased in both groups, but other items of QoL did not change significantly. Conclusion:Overall, our results showed that Captopril does not have a significant positive effect on QoL of patients with cancer cachexia.

Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis as a cause for hypertension in an adolescent patient

Atherosclerosis causing renal artery stenosis (RAS) is one of the most common secondary causes of hypertension in adults, but is rare in children. RAS associated with coronary artery stenosis was diagnosed in a teenage patient who presented with intermittent chest pain and elevated blood pressures for 6 years. The diagnosis of RAS was suspected after physical examination revealed an abdominal bruit. Renal ultrasound with Doppler revealed normal appearing kidneys with high velocity in the aorta and renal arteries. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the chest and abdomen demonstrated generalized calcified atherosclerotic narrowing of the arteries including the renal, celiac, superior mesenteric and coronary arteries in the setting of hyperlipidemia. The lipid panel revealed hypercholesterolemia with elevated serum plant sterol concentrations, suggesting the diagnosis of sitosterolemia. Cardiac catheterization demonstrated left anterior descending artery and left circumflex artery stenosis, which required bypass of the left anterior descending artery and stenting of the left circumflex artery. Aggressive lipid control was recommended and he was treated medically with a beta-blocker, low-dose angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, aspirin, statin, and clopidogrel. Although very rare, generalized atherosclerosis caused by genetic disorders should be considered an underlying cause for severe hypertension in children with hyperlipidemia.

Low-dose Enalapril Reduces Angiotensin II and Attenuates Diabetic-induced Cardiac and Autonomic Dysfunctions

Activation of renin-angiotensin system has been linked to cardiovascular and autonomic dysfunctions in diabetes. Experiments were performed to investigate the effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), enalapril, on cardiac and autonomic functions in diabetic rats. Diabetes was induced by streptozotocin (50 mg/kg), and rats were treated with enalapril (1 mg · kg(-1) · d(-1)). After 30 days, evaluations were performed in control, diabetic, and enalapril-treated groups. Cardiac function was evaluated by echocardiography and through cannulation of the left ventricle (at baseline and in response to volume overload). Heart rate and systolic blood pressure variabilities were evaluated in the time and frequency domains. Streptozotocin rats had left ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunctions, expressed by reduced ejection fraction and increased isovolumic relaxation time. The ACEI prevented these changes, improved diastolic cardiac responses to volume overload and total power of heart rate variability, reduced the ACE1 activity and protein expression and cardiac angiotensin (Ang) II levels, and increased angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 activity, despite unchanged blood pressure. Correlations were obtained between Ang II content with systolic and diastolic functions and heart rate variability. These findings provide evidence that the low-dose ACEI prevents autonomic and cardiac dysfunctions induced by diabetes without changing blood pressure and associated with reduced cardiac Ang II and increased angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 activity.

Differential effects of late-life initiation of low-dose enalapril and losartan on diastolic function in senescent Fischer 344 × Brown Norway male rats

No proven pharmacological therapies to delay or reverse age-related diastolic dysfunction exist. We hypothesized that late-life low-dose (non-blood-pressure-lowering) angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition vs. angiotensin II receptor blockade would be equally efficacious at mitigating diastolic dysfunction in the senescent Fischer 344 × Brown Norway rat. Enalapril (10mg/kg/day; n = 9) initiated at 24months of age and continued for 6months, increased myocardial relaxation (e'), reduced Doppler-derived indices of filling pressure (E/e'), favorably lowered the ratio of phospholamban-SERCA2 and reduced oxidative stress markers, Rac1 and nitrotyrosine, in aged hearts. Treatment with losartan (15mg/kg/day; n = 9) similarly mitigated signs of cardiac oxidative stress, but impairments in diastolic function persisted when compared with untreated rats (n = 7). Our findings favor the idea that the lusitropic benefit of low-dose angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor initiated late in life may be related to an antioxidant-mediated modulation of SERCA2, resulting in improved relaxation rather than via overt effects on cardiac structure or blood pressure.

糖尿病性腎症に対する低用量アンジオテンシンII受容体拮抗薬/低用量利尿薬/カルシウム拮抗薬の三剤併用療法の腎保護作用

Combination therapy with angiotensin receptor antagonist(ARB) plus angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor(ACE-I) (ARB/ACE-I) was efficacious in reducing proteinuria in patients with progressive renal disease. However, this therapy may be associated with the worsening of anemia and hyperkalemia. The present study addressed whether or not triple therapy with low-dose ARB, low-dose diuretic (D) and calcium channel blocker(CCB) (ARB/D/CCB) is as effective as therapy with low-dose ARB/ACE-I in retarding the progression of overt diabetic nephropathy. In the triple therapy, the patients were initially subjected to monotherapy with CCB for 24 weeks. Low-dose ARB and low-dose D were added to the treatment for an additional 24-week period. In parallel, patients undergoing double therapy were initially treated with low-dose ACE-I alone for 24 weeks, and then low-dose ARB was added for an additional 24-week period. The results were as follows: 1) In the triple therapy, blood pressure was reduced by 9 mmHg in systole and 5 mmHg in diastole (not significant) compared to monotherapy with CCB. There was a significant decline in proteinuria (3.3 +/- 1.2 g/day in the CCB-treated period vs. 2.1 +/- 1.0 g/day in the ARB/D/CCB-treated period, n = 12, p = 0.0143). Furthermore, a significant improvement in the slope of reciprocal serum creatinine concentration(1/Cr) was found in response to triple therapy(1/Cr: -0.0118 +/- 0.0009 in the CCB-treated vs. -0.0035 +/- 0.0028(I/mg/dl/month) in the ARB/D/CCB-treated period, n = 12, p < 0.001). There was neither a worsening of anemia nor an increase in the serum potassium(K) concentration. 2) In the double therapy, blood pressure was reduced by 12 mmHg in systole(p = 0.0079, n = 11) and 6 mmHg in diastole(n = 11, p = 0.0037) compared to the monotherapy with ACE-I. A significant improvement in the slope of 1/Cr was found in the double therapy(1/Cr: -0.0095 +/- 0.0052 in the ACE-I treated period vs. -0.0029 +/- 0.0028(I/mg/dl/month) in the ARB/ACE-I, n = 11, p < 0.001). In addition, there was a substantial reduction in hematocrit and increase in serum K concentration. The present result suggests that triple therapy consisting of ARB/D/CCB is as efficacious as double therapy with ARB/ACE-I in protecting the kidney from the progression in patients with diabetic overt nephropathy. The former may be expected to have less adverse effects.

Systemic sclerosis and autoimmune hepatitis

To the editor: We read with great interest the case study report of Rodrigues et al. [1] regarding concurrent systemic sclerosis (SSc) and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). The coexistence of AIH and some connective tissue diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, Sjogren’s syndrome, and systemic lupus erythematosus is well known; but the coexistence of SSc and AIH is very rare. To date, only a few cases have been reported. The authors described an SSc patient who diagnosed with positive antimitochondrial antibody (AMA) concomitant with AIH. They reported about 17% of AIH patients may be positive for AMA. However, it is important to note that AMA positivity can also be seen in nearly one quarter of patients with SSc [2]. Recently, we reported an AIH patient with SSc treated with prednisolone 50 mg/day, azathioprin 50 mg/day, and low-dose angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor. This approach showed us that such patients can be treated with high-dose steroid. After immunosuppressive therapy, biochemical remission was achieved in our patient; but in follow-up, portal hypertension and esophageal varices were developed. After careful evaluation of the patient reported by Rodrigues et al., we noticed that the patient’s INR value increased from 1.06 to 1.24. For that reason, we concluded that the patient was in hepatic failure despite of biochemical remission [1, 2]. In conclusion, large population-based studies may not be feasible due to rarity of the condition. However, we might conclude an acceptable approach from such individual cases. It should be kept in mind that biochemical response may not reflect complete remission in patient with AIH.

Metabolic effects of low dose angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor in dietary obesity in the rat

Background and aimsGiven the recent observation of a local renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in adipose tissue, and its association with obesity-related hypertension, the metabolic effects of treatment with a low dose angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) were investigated in a rodent model of diet-induced obesity. Methods and resultsMale Sprague Dawley rats were exposed to either standard laboratory chow (12% calories as fat) or palatable high fat (30% calories as fat) diet for 12 weeks. A subset from both dietary groups was given low dose ACEI in drinking water (perindopril, 0.3mg/kg/day) throughout the study. The high fat diet increased body weight, adiposity, circulating leptin and insulin and in the liver we observed fat accumulation and increased tissue ACE activity. Treatment with perindopril decreased food intake and circulating insulin in both diet groups, and hepatic ACE activity in high fat fed animals only. Decreased plasma leptin concentration with ACE inhibition was only evident in chow fed animals. These effects were independent of any blood pressure lowering effect of ACE inhibition. ConclusionChronic low dose ACEI treatment reduced circulating insulin and leptin levels with some reduction in food intake in chow fed rats. Fewer beneficial effects were observed in obesity, and further work is required to investigate higher ACEI doses. Our data suggest a reduction in hepatic ACE activity may affect lipid accumulation and other inflammatory responses, as well as improving insulin resistance. Our findings may have implications for maximizing the clinical benefit of ACEI in patients without overt cardiovascular complications.

Cardiovascular impact of exercise and drug therapy in older hypertensives with coronary heart disease: PREHACOR study

Our aim in this study was to examine the relationship between regular exercise and major cardiovascular events in hypertensive elderly with established coronary heart disease (CHD) in the primary care setting. The PREHACOR study recruited 3193 hypertensive patients, aged 74 +/- 6 years, 67% male, with CHD. Regular exercise assessed by questionnaire was defined as recreational activity >20 min/day, >3 times/week. Endpoints at 6 months were new cardiovascular events (NCEs: myocardial infarction and hospitalization for stroke, unstable angina, congestive heart failure, or coronary revascularization). New cardiovascular events occurred in 376 patients (11.8%), with 17 deaths (0.5%). New cardiovascular events patients were older, with higher body mass index, and were more likely to have diabetes, arrhythmia, history of congestive heart failure, and noncardiac organ damage than non-NCE patients. Blood pressure was significantly and similarly reduced in both groups. Multivariate logistic regression associated NCEs positively and independently with a history of congestive heart failure (odds ratio [OR] 2.50; confidence interval [CI] = 1.9-3.23), noncardiac target organ damage (OR 1.51; CI = 1.20-1.90), and beta-blocker use (OR 1.28; CI = 1.02-1.59), and inversely and independently with combination low-dose angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor + diuretic therapy (OR 0.66; CI = 0.45-0.95) and regular exercise (OR 0.70; CI = 0.54-0.90). Regular exercise is significantly associated with fewer major cardiovascular events in hypertensive elderly subjects with established CHD.

The contribution of observational studies to the knowledge of drug effectiveness in heart failure

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the golden standard for the assessment of drug efficacy. Little is known about the add-on value of observational studies in heart failure (HF). We aimed to assess the contribution of observational studies to actual knowledge regarding the effectiveness of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), and beta-blockers (BB) in HF. Observational studies that assessed the effectiveness of ACEI and BB in HF were identified by searching Medline, Embase, Cochrane Database (1990-2005) and the bibliographies of published articles. Cohort, case-control and time-series analysis studies were considered for inclusion. Studies with <100 patients and those who did not perform a multivariate analysis were excluded. A total of 23 cohort studies met the inclusion criteria. Studies of ACEI and BB showed a decrease in mortality with drug use in elderly patients with a broad range of ejection fraction (EF), and in those with depressed EF. Additionally, they showed a decrease in mortality in patients with renal insufficiency. The effect of ACEI and BB in HF with preserved EF was not clear, although last evidence suggests a potential benefit. Low-dose ACEI and BB may have beneficial effects. Target doses of ACEI seemed superior to low doses, but there was no clear dose-response relationship. Observational studies in HF validate the effectiveness of ACEI and BB in populations underrepresented or excluded from RCTs. Observational studies of drug effectiveness provide relevant additional information for clinical practice.

Suppression of Choroidal Neovascularization by Inhibiting Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme: Minimal Role of Bradykinin

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), also known as kininase II, functions not only to convert angiotensin I to angiotensin II, but also to cleave bradykinin into inactive fragments. Thus, ACE inhibition causes the tissue accumulation of bradykinin, exerting either of two opposite effects: anti- or proangiogenic. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the role of bradykinin in the development of choroidal neovascularization (CNV), with or without ACE inhibition. Laser photocoagulation was used to induce CNV in wild-type C57BL/6J mice and angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1-R)-deficient mice. Wild-type mice were pretreated with the ACE inhibitor imidapril, with or without the bradykinin B2 receptor (B2-R) antagonist icatibant daily for 6 days before photocoagulation, and the treatment was continued daily until the end of the study. CNV response was analyzed by volumetric measurements using confocal microscopy 1 week after laser injury. The mRNA and protein levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1, and monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP)-1 in the retinal pigment epithelium-choroid complex were examined by RT-PCR and ELISA, respectively. ACE inhibition led to significant suppression of CNV development to the level seen in AT1-R-deficient mice. B2-R blockade together with high-dose but not low-dose ACE inhibition resulted in more potent suppression of CNV than did ACE inhibition alone. B2-R blockade alone exhibited little or no effect on CNV. VEGF, ICAM-1, and MCP-1 levels, elevated by CNV induction, were significantly suppressed by ACE inhibition. VEGF but not ICAM-1 or MCP-1 levels were further attenuated by B2-R blockade with ACE inhibition. These results suggest a limited contribution of the kallikrein-kinin system to the pathogenesis of CNV, in which the renin-angiotensin system plays more essential roles for facilitating angiogenesis. The present study indicates the possibility of ACE inhibition as a novel therapeutic strategy to inhibit CNV.

Aspirin Use and Outcomes in a Community-Based Cohort of 7352 Patients Discharged After First Hospitalization for Heart Failure

The safety of aspirin in heart failure (HF) has been called into question, particularly in those patients (1) without coronary disease, (2) with renal dysfunction, or (3) treated with low-dose angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and high-dose aspirin. We examined prescription patterns and outcomes (all-cause mortality and/or HF readmission) in patients discharged from 103 Canadian hospitals between April 1999 and March 2001 after a first hospitalization for HF. Of 7352 patients with HF (mean age, 75 years; 44% without coronary disease and 29% with renal dysfunction), 2785 (38%) died or required HF readmission within the first year. Compared with nonusers, aspirin users were no more likely to die or require HF readmission (hazard ratio [HR], 1.02 [0.91 to 1.16]), even in patients without coronary disease (HR, 0.98 [0.78 to 1.22]) or patients with renal dysfunction (HR, 1.13 [0.94 to 1.36]). On the other hand, users of ACE inhibitors were less likely to die or require HF readmission (HR, 0.87 [0.79 to 0.96]), even if they were using aspirin (HR, 0.86 [0.77 to 0.95]). There were no dose-dependent interactions between aspirin and ACE inhibitors. In this observational study, aspirin use was not associated with an increase in mortality rates or HF readmission rates, and aspirin did not attenuate the benefits of ACE inhibitors, even in patients without coronary disease, patients with renal dysfunction, or patients treated with high-dose aspirin and low-dose ACE inhibitors.

Treatment with low-dose angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) plus angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) in pediatric patients with IgA nephropathy

Treatment with low-dose angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) plus angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) in pediatric patients with IgA nephropathy

Treatment with low-dose angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) plus angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) in pediatric patients with IgA nephropathy

IgA nephropathy associated with heavy proteinuria is considered a more progressive form of this disease. In this report, we describe the favorable clinical effect of combination therapy with low doses of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) and angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) in the chronic stage of pediatric IgA nephropathy associated with heavy proteinuria. We initially used ACEI for seven children with IgA nephropathy and heavy proteinuria who did not achieve remission with the routine treatment including steroids. With ACEI therapy alone, only three patients showed an antiproteinuric response. In one of the three patients, the proteinuria decreased by half, but was still over 1 g/day. In the other four patients, the proteinuria did not decrease. In these five patients, of whom one partial was a responder and four were non-responders for ACEI, ARB was added, and in marked contrast to ACEI therapy alone, the antiproteinuric effect was significantly augmented (p < 0.01). The antiproteinuric response induced by combination therapy was not accompanied by blood pressure changes. Urinary low-molecular protein and N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase (NAG) levels tended to decrease after both ACEI alone and combination therapy. These data indicate that inhibition therapy of the angiotensin system not only decreases proteinuria levels but also protects renal tubular cells. Moreover, there were no obvious side effects associated with this therapy during the follow-up period of our clinical trial. In conclusion, this report shows that the combination of low doses of ACEI and ARB might provide marked antiproteinuric and long-term renoprotective effects in pediatric IgA nephropathy, with this approach appearing to be both well-tolerated and safe.

Consistency of the beneficial effect of metoprolol succinate extended release across a wide range dose of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and digitalis

Background The effects of β-blockade with different extent of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and digitalization are unknown. To assess the effect of metoprolol succinate controlled release/extended release (CR/XL) combined with high versus low doses of ACEI and digitalis, we analyzed data from The Metoprolol CR/XL Randomized Intervention Trial in Chronic Heart Failure (MERIT-HF) in which patients with heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% were randomized to metoprolol CR/XL versus placebo. Methods and results Outcome was analyzed separately for those on a low dose (≤median) of the ACEI or digitalis versus high dose (>median). The mean dose of ACEI in the high-dose group (n = 1457) was 3 times higher than that in the low-dose group (n = 2094). Mortality was reduced to a similar extent in the high- and low-dose ACEI subgroups (RR = .69 versus .64, respectively). Corresponding figures for combined mortality/all hospitalization and for mortality/hospitalization for heart failure were .85 versus .83, and .70 versus .68, respectively. Likewise, reduction in total mortality with metoprolol CR/XL was similar in patients receiving no digitalis (n = 1447; RR = .56), low dose (n = 1122; RR = .71), or high dose (n = 1421; RR = .71). Conclusion This analysis of MERIT-HF demonstrates consistent and similar improvement in outcome of patients receiving metoprolol CR/XL when combined with either a high or low dose of an ACEI or digitalis, or no digitalis at all. Thus regardless of ACEI and digitalis dose and whether patients are treated with digitalis or not, it is very important to add a β-blocker to the existing heart failure therapy. β-blockers should not be withheld until target doses of ACEI have been achieved.

Use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy and dose-related outcomes in older adults with new heart failure in the community.

To evaluate the dose-related benefit of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor therapy among older adults with heart failure and to evaluate whether low-dose ACE inhibitor therapy is better than none. Observational cohort study. Community-dwelling older adults in Ontario, Canada. We identified 16539 adults 66 years or older who survived 45 days following their first heart failure hospitalization discharge. Multivariate techniques including propensity scores were used to study the association between the dose of ACE inhibitor therapy dispensed and 3 outcomes: survival, survival or heart failure rehospitalization, and survival or all-cause hospitalization at 1 year of follow-up. Logistic regression models explored the association between initial dose dispensed and subsequent dose reduction or drug cessation. Overall, 10793 (65.3%) of patients were dispensed ACE inhibitor therapy, with more than a third (3935; 36.5%) initiated on low-dose therapy. Relative to dispensing of low-dose ACE inhibitor therapy, nonuse was associated with increased mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02 to 1.22). Dispensing medium-dose therapy provided a benefit similar to low-dose (HR, 0.94; CI, 0.86 to 1.03) and dispensing of high-dose therapy was associated with improved survival benefit (HR, 0.76; CI, 0.68 to 0.85). Relative to dispensing of low-dose ACE inhibitor therapy, dispensing high-dose conferred a benefit (HR, 0.87; CI, 0.80 to 0.95) on the composite outcome of 1-year mortality or heart failure hospitalization and the composite outcome of 1-year mortality or all-cause hospitalization (HR, 0.87; CI, 0.81 to 0.93). Relative to those dispensed low-dose ACE inhibitor therapy, those initially dispensed high-dose therapy were twice as likely to have their subsequent dose reduced or the therapy discontinued (odds ratio, 2.36; CI, 2.07 to 2.69). Our findings suggest that when possible, older adults should be titrated to the higher doses of ACE inhibitor therapy evaluated in clinical trials. If older adults cannot tolerate higher doses, then low-dose ACE inhibitor therapy is superior to none. High-dose ACE inhibitor therapy is not as well tolerated as lower doses.

Do evidence-based treatments provide incremental benefits to patients with congestive heart failure already receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors? A secondary analysis of one-year outcomes from the assessment of treatment with lisinopril and survival (ATLAS) study

Background: In patients with congestive heart failure (CHF), use of submaximal doses of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (ie, low-dose ACE inhibitors) represents usual care in routine clinical practice, whereas high-dose ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, and digoxin have each been shown to improve outcomes. Objective: We examined whether treatment with high dose-ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, and digoxin would each provide incremental benefits over that achieved with usual care and whether concurrent use of high-dose ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, and digoxin would provide maximal benefits. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of a randomized, controlled, active-comparator trial. Specifically, we studied 1-year outcomes data from the Assessment of Treatment with Lisinopril and Survival trial (ATLAS), which assessed high-dose ACE inhibitors (mean dosage, 33.2 mg daily lisinopril) versus low-dose ACE inhibitors (mean dosage, 4.5 mg daily lisinopril) in patients of any age with advanced CHF in 287 centers in 19 countries in the 1990s. In our analysis, patients were classified by their use of low-dose or high-dose ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, and/or digoxin at the time of randomization. The primary outcome of interest was the ATLAS composite end point of all-cause mortality or hospitalization for any reason at 1 year. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to adjust for baseline differences in patient characteristics. Results: The 3164 patients in the ATLAS study had a mean (SD) age of 64 (10) years; 2516 patients (80%) were men and 648 (20%) were women; mean (SD) left-ventricular ejection fraction was 23% (6%); and 2671 patients (84%) had New York Heart Association class III or IV symptoms. At 1 year, the mortality rate was 13% (408 patients); 43% (1369 patients) had ≥1 hospitalization; and the composite end point of mortality or hospitalization was 47% (1489 patients). Most patients (2873; 91%) remained on their initial treatment regimen. Compared with low-dose ACE inhibitors (n = 471), the composite end point decreased incrementally with the use of high-dose ACE inhibitors (n = 475) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.93; P = NS), high-dose ACE inhibitors plus beta-blockers (n = 72) (aOR, 0.89; P = NS), and high-dose ACE inhibitors plus beta-blockers plus digoxin (n = 77) (aOR, 0.47; P = 0.006). In absolute proportions, patients receiving high-dose ACE inhibitors plus beta-blockers plus digoxin for 1 year had 12% fewer deaths and hospitalizations than patients receiving low-dose ACE inhibitors alone. Conclusions: Compared with usual care for patients with CHF, in this analysis, an evidence-based strategy that incorporated high-dose ACE inhibitors plus beta-blockers plus digoxin was associated with incrementally greater reductions in morbidity and mortality. These findings support treatment guidelines that recommend the concurrent use of all available proven efficacious treatment in patients with advanced CHF.

High-versus low-dose ACE inhibitor therapy in chronic heart failure.

To discuss the controversy associated with the optimal dosing of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in the management of patients with systolic heart failure; specifically, to review data related to the use of high-dose ACE inhibitors related to both neurohormonal and clinical outcomes associated with doses similar to, lower than, and higher than those used in the large, randomized clinical trials. Primary, review, and meta-analysis articles were identified by MEDLINE search (1987-September 2002) and through secondary sources. All of the articles identified from the data sources were evaluated, and all information deemed relevant was included in this discussion. All available comparative dose trials, both prospective and retrospective, were evaluated for clinical and neurohormonal outcomes. The majority of data comparing the effect of high- with low-dose ACE inhibitors on neurohormonal outcomes demonstrate dose-related reduction in various neurohormonal measurements including plasma ACE, aldosterone, atrial natriuretic peptide, B-type natriuretic peptide, and interleukin-6 levels. Clinical endpoints including New York Heart Association class and heart failure-related hospitalizations were reduced by higher doses, but a dose-related survival benefit has not been demonstrated. Differences in duration of therapy and study design may account for variability in neurohormonal and morbidity results among various studies. Despite documented underutilization in clinical practice of doses of ACE inhibitors demonstrated in large controlled trials to improve morbidity and mortality, clinicians should attempt to reach these target doses if possible in patients with heart failure. Higher doses may improve surrogate markers for heart failure without impacting survival.

Effects of low-dose combination therapy with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and a diuretic on flow-mediated vasodilation in hypertensive patients: a 6-month, single-center study

Background Combination therapy with an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor and a diuretic has been shown to be highly effective in hypertension. Clinical trials have demonstrated that ACE inhibitors may improve endothelial cell dysfunction in hypertension. However, the effectiveness of the combination treatment in endothelial cell dysfunction is unknown. Objective This study investigated the effects of a new low-dose combination, perindopril 2 mg plus indapamide 0.625 mg, on brachial artery flow–mediated vasodilation (FMD) and left ventricular diastolic function in hypertension. Methods Patients aged 18 to 75 with newly diagnosed stage I or II hypertension were eligible. Endothelium-dependent brachial artery FMD and endothelium-independent vasodilation were assessed at baseline. Patients were treated with oral perindopril 2 mg plus indapamide 0.625-mg tablets once daily for 6 months. FMD measurements were then repeated. Percentage changes in FMD from baseline to 6 months, as well as left ventricular diastolic function parameters (isovolumic relaxation time [IVRT] and mitral diastolic E-wave deceleration time [EDT]), indicated the effectiveness of the intervention. Results Twenty-nine Turkish patients were enrolled (17 women, 12 men; mean [SD] age, 54.5 [9.5] years [range, 38–75 years]). The mean (SD) baseline FMD was 7.00% (2.39%) (endothelial cell dysfunction) and increased significantly to 8.68% (2.78%) at 6 months ( P = 0.02); FMD improved in 15 patients (51.7%). At baseline and 6 months of therapy, mean (SD) IVRT was 101.7 (12.4) ms and 95.5 (7.7) ms, respectively ( P<0.001), and EDT was 234.7 (33.9) ms and 217.9 (25.6) ms, respectively ( P<0.001). Conclusions In this small sample of hypertensive patients, a low-dose combination ACE inhibitor and diuretic significantly improved brachial artery FMD and left ventricular diastolic function. The improvement in FMD values was independent of the stage of hypertension. These findings suggest a relationship between improvement in endothelial cell function and diastolic function.