Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Lowering Therapy Research Articles

Safety and Effectiveness of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol-Lowering Therapy With Evolocumab for Familial Hypercholesterolemia/Hypercholesterolemia in Japan: A Real-World, Postmarketing, Single-Arm Study.

Evolocumab is the first monoclonal antibody against proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 approved in Japan for familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and hypercholesterolemia; however, data on its safety and effectiveness in the real-world setting in Japan are limited. This real-world, postmarketing, single-arm study assessed the safety and effectiveness of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering with evolocumab in patients with homozygous/heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and hypercholesterolemia with high risk in Japan (668 sites). The primary safety end point was the incidence (percentage) and number of patients with adverse drug reactions and serious adverse events during the 104-week follow-up. Primary effectiveness end points included the percentage change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels from baseline to week 12, assessed using 2-sided paired t tests. The safety and effectiveness sets comprised 3724 (homozygous FH, n=108; heterozygous FH, n=2009; hypercholesterolemia with high risk, n=1607) and 2797 (homozygous FH, n=91; heterozygous FH, n=1615; hypercholesterolemia with high risk, n=1091) patients, respectively. Overall, mean age and disease duration were 63.2 and 12.3 years, respectively. Serious adverse drug reactions and serious adverse events were experienced by 0.5% and 10.3% of patients; the incidence rates of myocardial infarction and stroke were 0.7% and 0.3%, respectively. A significant mean±SD percentage change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels was observed at week 12 among patients with homozygous FH (-45.7%±28.2; P<0.001), heterozygous FH (-55.9%±28.8; P<0.001), and hypercholesterolemia with high risk (-63.3%±23.7; P<0.001). Evolocumab was well tolerated, and real-world patients with familial hypercholesterolemia and hypercholesterolemia with high risk in Japan had sustained low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT02808403.

Lesion-level changes induced by low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction: the pre-specified PACMAN-AMI lesion-level analysis

Abstract Background Previous intracoronary imaging studies investigated atherosclerotic changes induced by lipid-lowering therapy in extensive coronary segments, based on anatomical landmarks and irrespective of the baseline atheroma burden. The effects of lipid-lowering therapy focusing on coronary lesions with advanced atherosclerotic features and at presumably higher risk for future events remains largely unknown. Purpose To provide a lesion-level analysis reporting changes in high-risk atherosclerotic features and plaque phenotypes induced by alirocumab versus placebo in addition to high-intensity statin therapy in nonculprit coronary lesions of patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods In this pre-specified lesion-level analysis of the PACMAN-AMI trial, coronary lesions were identified as segments with plaque burden ≥40% defined by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). IVUS, near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) images at baseline and 52-week follow-up were manually matched and lesion-level imaging outcome measures were calculated by analysts blinded to treatment allocation and patient clinical data. The evolution of high-risk plaque phenotypes as defined by each imaging modality (IVUS-defined plaque burden ≥70%, NIRS-defined maximum LCBI 4 mm ≥400, OCT-defined thin-cap fibroatheroma &amp;lt;65µm) was investigated. Results Overall, 591 lesions with available baseline and follow-up imaging were included. Of these, 287 were identified in 118 patients (214 vessels) in the alirocumab arm, and 304 lesions were identified in 127 patients (239 vessels) in the placebo arm. At lesion-level, mean change in percent atheroma volume (PAV) by IVUS was -4.86% with alirocumab vs -2.78% with placebo (difference, -2.02 [-3.00 to -1.05], p&amp;lt;.001), substantially greater than that at vessel-level (Figure 1). At the minimum lumen area (MLA) site, mean change in PAV was -10.14% with alirocumab vs -6.70% with placebo (difference, -3.36 (-4.98 to -1.75, p&amp;lt;0.001). MLA increased by 0.15 mm2 with alirocumab and decreased by 0.07 mm2 in the placebo arm (difference, +0.21, 0.01 to 0.41, p=0.036), whereas arterial remodeling was similar between arms (-0.73±1.61 in alirocumab vs -0.63±1.31 in placebo group, p=0.482). Among lesions with high-risk plaque phenotypes at baseline, those in the alirocumab arm more frequently showed a more stable and less lipid-rich plaque phenotype at follow-up than those in the placebo arm (Figure 2). Conclusions At lesion-level, intense lipid-lowering therapy with alirocumab in addition to high-intensity statin therapy induced extensive PAV regression, substantially greater than described in previous vessel-level analyses. Compared to statin therapy alone, alirocumab treatment was associated with a greater enlargement of the lesion MLA, similar negative arterial remodeling, and a more frequent transition of high-risk plaque phenotypes into more stable, less lipid-rich plaque phenotypes.Figure 1.Figure 2

Differences in cardiovascular risk in the general population of low and high altitude residents in Peru. HIGH Altitude CArdiovascular REsearch Latin America Population Study (HIGHCARE-LAPS)

Abstract Introduction Living at high altitude (HA) is associated with profound changes in cardiovascular physiology, mostly caused by chronic hypoxia. Available data from high income countries (Switzerland, Austria) suggest beneficial effects of moderate altitude residence in terms of cardiovascular risk. Little is known, however, about cardiovascular risk profile in long-term residents of higher altitudes from low-income countries. Aim To compare cardiovascular risk estimated with validated score in population-based samples of permanent residents of low and high-altitude communities in Peru. Methods Study participants (adults permanently residing at either low or high altitude) were recruited by sex- and age-stratified random multistage cluster sampling from the general population of urban areas at different altitudes in Peru (lowlanders: &amp;lt;500 m above sea level, highlanders: cities at 3287 m, 3824 m and 4330 m). For all participants questionnaire-based information, conventional blood pressure (BP; 3 seated measurements with a validated oscillometric device) and laboratory variables were obtained. Based on the collected data atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk was estimated according to Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE, previously calibrated in South American population). Participants below 40 years of age, with ASVCD history, with LDL-C≥190 mg/dL or on LDL-C lowering therapy were excluded from this analysis. Results The analysis included 146 lowlanders and 373 highlanders, most of whom had low 10-year ASVCD risk, with the median estimated risk being significantly higher among lowlanders. Comparisons between the groups in terms of principal variables of interest are reported in the Table. The highlanders were slightly younger, had lower BMI, conventional BP, HDL cholesterol, lower prevalence of antihypertensive medication and of diabetes, and higher heart rate. In a multivariable model the difference in ASCVD risk between lowlanders and highlanders was significant (p=0.0009) after adjusting for BMI and socio-economic variables but not after systolic BP was included in the model (p=0.800). Conclusions Residence at HA is associated with a lower estimated ASCVD risk in the general population of Peru, mainly because of lower BP levels. Considering that the prognostic value of cardiovascular risk estimates in highland populations is unknown, longitudinal cohort studies would be required to assess whether this finding is associated with a lower rate of cardiovascular events.

Comparative efficacy of colchicine and intensive LDL-C lowering in patients with ASCVD receiving statins: a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Abstract Background Adding intensive low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering treatments or colchicine to statins resulted in additional cardiovascular benefits. However, the relative efficacy and priority of these agents are unclear. Purpose We aimed to compare the effects of these supplementary agents on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD) receiving statins. Methods We performed a systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis on randomized controlled trials. The primary efficacy endpoint was the main adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), and the secondary efficacy endpoints were myocardial infarct, stroke, coronary revascularization, cardiovascular death and all-cause mortality. The safety endpoints were treatment discontinuation and non-cardiovascular death. Colchicine was used as reference treatment. Random-effects model was used in case of high heterogeneity, the fixed-effects model was preferred otherwise. We ranked the comparative effects of all drugs with surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) probabilities. Results 17 trials totaling 85823 participants treated with colchicine, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor, Niemann-Pick C1-like 1 protein (NPC1L1) inhibitor and ATP citrate lyase (ACL) inhibitor were included. Compared with colchicine, NPC1L1 inhibitor was associated with increased risk of MACE (risk ratio [RR]: 1.39, 1.21-1.59), stroke (RR: 1.81, 1.09-3.00) and coronary revascularization (RR: 1.36, 1.11-1.68), and PCSK9 inhibitor was associated with increased risk of MACE (RR: 1.27, 1.10-1.46). However, NPC1L1 inhibitor (RR: 0.68, 0.48-0.96) and PCSK9 inhibitor (RR: 0.64, 0.44-0.93) were associated with reduced risk of non-cardiovascular death in comparison to colchicine. PCSK9 inhibitors had a lower risk of MACE (RR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.85-0.98) and coronary revascularization (RR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.81-0.97) compared with NPC1L1 inhibitor. Although no regimen prolonged survival, colchicine had the lowest rank at non-cardiovascular death and the worse performance on all-cause mortality. Conclusions In patients with ASCVD receiving statins, inflammation-inhibiting with colchicine seems to be superior to intensive LDL-C lowering therapy with PCSK9 inhibitor or NPC1L1 inhibitor in cardiovascular prevention. However, using colchicine as an alternative to intensive lipid-lowering therapy may need to be weighed against the greater cardiovascular benefits and the potential harms of higher non-cardiovascular death. Given the worse performance of colchicine on survival based on current evidence, colchicine may be more appropriate for patients who have been treated with intensive LDL-C-lowering agents but still have recurrent cardiovascular events.Forest plots of included agentsRadar plot of treatments based on SUCRA

Treatment status of LDL-C lowering therapy according to genetic variant in familial hypercholesterolemia: From the Korean familial hypercholesterolemia (KFH) registry

Treatment status of LDL-C lowering therapy according to genetic variant in familial hypercholesterolemia: From the Korean familial hypercholesterolemia (KFH) registry

Beyond LDL-C: unravelling the residual atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk landscape-focus on hypertriglyceridaemia.

Historically, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk profile mitigation has had a predominant focus on low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). In this narrative review we explore the residual ASCVD risk profile beyond LDL-C with a focus on hypertriglyceridaemia, recent clinical trials of therapeutics targeting hypertriglyceridaemia and novel modalities addressing other residual ASCVD risk factors. Hypertriglyceridaemia remains a significant ASCVD risk despite low LDL-C in statin or proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor-treated patients. Large population-based observational studies have consistently demonstrated an association between hypertriglyceridaemia with ASCVD. This relationship is complicated by the co-existence of low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Despite significantly improving atherogenic dyslipidaemia, the most recent clinical trial outcome has cast doubt on the utility of pharmacologically lowering triglyceride concentrations using fibrates. On the other hand, purified eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), but not in combination with docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), has produced favourable ASCVD outcomes. The outcome of these trials suggests alternate pathways involved in ASCVD risk modulation. Several other pharmacotherapies have been proposed to address other ASCVD risk factors targeting inflammation, thrombotic and metabolic factors. Hypertriglyceridaemia poses a significant residual ASCVD risk in patients already on LDL-C lowering therapy. Results from pharmacologically lowering triglyceride are conflicting. The role of fibrates and combination of EPA and DHA is under question but there is now convincing evidence of ASCVD risk reduction with pure EPA in a subgroup of patients with hypertriglyceridaemia. Clinical guidelines should be updated in line with recent clinical trials evidence. Novel agents targeting non-conventional ASCVD risks need further evaluation.

Course of the effects of LDL-cholesterol reduction on cardiovascular risk over time: A meta-analysis of 60 randomized controlled trials

Background and aimsIndividuals with or at high risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) often receive long-term treatment with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering therapies, but whether the effects of LDL-C reduction remain stable over time is uncertain. This study aimed to establish the course of the effects of LDL-C reduction on cardiovascular risk over time. MethodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) of LDL-C lowering therapies were identified through a search in MEDLINE and EMBASE (1966–January 2023). The primary analyses were restricted to statins, ezetimibe, and proprotein convertase subtilisin–kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, with other therapies included in sensitivity analyses. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to establish the hazard ratio (HR) for major vascular events (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, coronary revascularization, or stroke) per 1 mmol/L LDL-C reduction. Course of the effects over time was assessed using random-effects meta-regression analyses for the association between follow-up duration, age, and the HR for major vascular events per 1 mmol/L LDL-C reduction. Additionally, treatment-by-time interactions were evaluated in an individual participant data meta-analysis of six atorvastatin trials. ResultsA total of 60 RCTs were identified (408,959 participants, 51,425 major vascular events). The HR for major vascular events per 1 mmol/L LDL-C reduction was 0.78 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.75–0.81). Follow-up duration was not associated with a change in the HR for major vascular events (HR for change per year 0.994; 95 % CI 0.970–1.020; p = 0.66). The HR attenuated with increasing age in primary prevention (HR for change per 5 years 1.097; 95 % CI 1.031–1.168; p = 0.003), but not secondary prevention (HR for change per 5 years 0.987; 95 % CI 0.936–1.040; p = 0.63). Consistent results were found for statin trials only, and all trials combined. In the individual participant data meta-analysis (31,310 participants, 6734 major vascular events), the HR for major vascular events did not significantly change over follow-up time (HR for change per year 0.983; 95 % CI 0.943–1.025; p = 0.42), or age (HR for change per 5 years 1.022; 95 % CI 0.990–1.055; p = 0.18). ConclusionsBased on available RCT data with limited follow-up duration, the relative treatment effects of LDL-C reduction are stable over time in secondary prevention, but may attenuate with higher age in primary prevention.

VXX-401, a novel anti-PCSK9 vaccine, reduces LDL-C in cynomolgus monkeys

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) remains the leading cause of disease burden in the world and is highly correlated with chronic elevations of LDL-C. LDL-C-lowering drugs, such as statins or monoclonal antibodies against proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), are known to reduce the risk of cardiovascular diseases; however, statins are associated with limited efficacy and poor adherence to treatment, whereas PCSK9 inhibitors are only prescribed to a “high-risk” patient population or those who have failed other therapies. Based on the proven efficacy and safety profile of existing monoclonal antibodies, we have developed a peptide-based vaccine against PCSK9, VXX-401, as an alternative option to treat hypercholesterolemia and prevent ASCVD. VXX-401 is designed to trigger a safe humoral immune response against PCSK9, resulting in the production of endogenous antibodies and a subsequent 30–40% reduction in blood LDL-C. In this article, VXX-401 demonstrates robust immunogenicity and sustained serum LDL-C-lowering effects in nonhuman primates. In addition, antibodies induced by VXX-401 bind to human PCSK9 with high affinity and block the inhibitory effect of PCSK9 on LDL-C uptake in a hepatic cell model. A repeat-dose toxicity study conducted in nonhuman primates under good laboratory practices toxicity indicated a suitable safety and tolerability profile, with injection site reactions being the main findings. As a promising safe and effective LDL-C-lowering therapy, VXX-401 may represent a broadly accessible and convenient option to treat hypercholesterolemia and prevent ASCVD.

Abstract 16434: 104-Week Safety and Effectiveness of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol-Lowering Therapy With Evolocumab in Patients With Familial Hypercholesterolemia/Hypercholesterolemia in Japan: Results of Post-Marketing Surveillance

Introduction: Evolocumab is the first monoclonal antibody against proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 approved in Japan for familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and hypercholesterolemia (HC). Aims: This study assessed the 104-week safety and effectiveness of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)-lowering therapy with evolocumab in patients with FH (homo/heterozygous) and HC in a real-world setting in Japan. Methods: Overall, 3721 and 2792 patients (108 and 91 homozygous FH, 2007 and 1613 heterozygous FH, 1606 and 1088 HC) from 668 clinical sites comprised the safety and effectiveness analysis sets, respectively. Primary safety endpoints: incidence (%) and number of patients with adverse drug reactions and serious adverse events. Effectiveness endpoints: % change in LDL-C from baseline at Week 12 (n=2386, primary endpoint) and Weeks 4-104 (secondary endpoint). Results: Mean age: 63.2 years; female: 33.8%. The mean±SD follow-up duration was 545.5±218.8 days. Adverse drug reaction subject incidence was 5.2%. Serious adverse event subject incidence was 8.9% (330/3721). The adverse event incidences of myocardial infarction and stroke were 0.6% (n=23/3721) and 0.6% (n=21/3721; 0.3% ischemic stroke [n=12]/0.2% hemorrhagic stroke [n=9]), respectively. Table 1 shows adverse events by lowest achieved LDL-C levels. The mean±SD % change in LDL-C from baseline to Weeks 12 and 104 were –45.7%±28.2% (n=84) and –50.9±21.1% (n=48) in homozygous FH patients ( P &lt;0.001 vs baseline; two-sided paired t -test), –56.0%±28.9% (n=1440) and –54.5±28.3% (n=905) in heterozygous FH patients ( P &lt;0.001), and –63.3%±23.7% (n=862) and –60.8±28.1% (n=352) in HC patients ( P &lt;0.001), respectively. Conclusions: There were no trends between the lowest achieved LDL-C levels and adverse events in Japanese patients. Evolocumab was well tolerated and sustained LDL-C reduction in patients with FH and HC in a real-world clinical setting in Japan.

Impact of Intensive Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol-Lowering Therapy on Coronary Artery Plaques in Acute Coronary Syndrome

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is associated with a high incidence of unstable plaques beyond the culprit lesion, leading to early recurrence of cardiovascular events. Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) can be used to noninvasively observe plaques throughout the coronary arteries. To evaluate the impact of intensive low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)-lowering therapy on quantitative changes in coronary plaque, assessed using CCTA in a study population with ACS. In total, 81 consecutive patients with ACS who underwent CCTA at discharge and at 1-year follow-up from April 2018 to March 2020 were analyzed. The patients were divided into 2 groups: those who achieved LDL-C <70 mg/100 ml and those who did not. Changes in plaque morphology within and between the 2 groups were compared using CCTA. A total of 198 vessels were analyzed. The calcified plaque volume was significantly increased in the LDL-C <70 group (65.8 ± 80.1 mm3 to 73.6 ± 83.7 mm3, p=0.007), whereas no significant change was observed in the LDL-C ≥70 group (106.9 ± 161.7 mm3 to 105.7 ± 137.5 mm3, p=0.552). Percent change in low-attenuation plaque volume in the LDL <70 group was significantly lower than in the LDL-C ≥70 group (17.2 ± 90.9% vs 84.4 ± 162.6%, p=0.020). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that the target LDL-C level for low-attenuation plaque volume regression was 64 mg/100 ml. In conclusion, noninvasive CCTA demonstrated that intensive LDL-C lowering in high-risk patients with ACS could potentially lead to plaque stabilization.

Prescribing of Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol-lowering Therapies and Eligibility for Use of Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/kexin Type 9 Monoclonal Antibodies Early After ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction

Prescribing of Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol-lowering Therapies and Eligibility for Use of Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/kexin Type 9 Monoclonal Antibodies Early After ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction

Genetics, Safety, Cost-Effectiveness, and Accessibility of Injectable Lipid-Lowering Agents: A Narrative Review.

Cardiovascular disease causes significant personal, financial, and societal burden and is a major cause of mortality and morbidity globally. Dyslipidemia has proven to be a major factor that contributes to its increased incidence; thus, since a long time, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-lowering therapies have been employed to reduce coronary artery disease-associated mortality. The first-line therapy for hyperlipidemia and dyslipidemia is statins. Evidence showed that statins decrease the level of LDL-C resulting in a lower risk of CVD (20-25% for every decrease of 1 mmol/L). However, due to statin intolerance in some patients and despite using maximal doses, they have not been successful in lowering cardiovascular-associated mortality. Moreover, bococizumab was recently suspended due to its higher immunogenicity with time, resulting in less efficacy with long-term use. Alternatives to statins are PCSK9 inhibitors which are administered subcutaneously every two or four weeks. They are injectables with considerable lipid-lowering properties. This narrative review discusses their genetics, safety, tolerability, and cost-effectiveness. It also quantifies their benefit in certain subgroups by analyzing the findings from recent randomized clinical trials. Current data from phase 2 and 3 trials (ORION, ODYSSEY, and FOURIER) suggest a favorable profile for evolocumab, alirocumab, and inclisiran with minimal tolerable side effects and superior efficacy in statin-intolerant patients. Their cost-effectiveness has not yet been established clearly, but future outcomes seem promising.

Validation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol equations in pediatric population.

Several studies have shown a high prevalence of dyslipidemia in children. Since childhood lipid concentrations continue into adulthood, recognition of lipid abnormalities in the early period is crucial to prevent the development of future coronary heart disease (CHD). Low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is one of the most used parameters in the initiation and follow-up of treatment in patients with dyslipidemia. It is a well known fact that LDL-C lowering therapy reduces the risk of future CHD. Therefore, accurate determination of the LDL-C levels is so important for the management of lipid abnormalities. This study aimed to validate different LDL-C estimating equations in the Turkish population, composed of children and adolescents. A total of 3,908 children below 18 years old at Sivas Cumhuriyet University Hospital (Sivas, Turkey) were included in this study. LDL-C was directly measured by direct homogeneous assays, i.e., Roche, Beckman, Siemens and estimated by Friedewald's, Martin/Hopkins', extended Martin-Hopkins' and Sampson's formulas. The concordances between the estimations obtained by the formulas and the direct measurements were evaluated both overall and separately for the LDL-C, triglycerides (TG) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) sublevels. Linear regression analysis was performed and residual error plots were generated between each estimation and direct measurement method. Coefficient of determination (R 2) and mean absolute deviations were also evaluated. The overall concordance of Friedewald, Sampson, Martin-Hopkins and the extended Martin-Hopkins formula were 64.6%, 69.9%, 69.4%, and 84.3% for the Roche direct assay, 69.8%, 71.6%, 73.6% and 80.4% for the Siemens direct assay, 66.5%, 68.8%, 68.9% and 82.1% for the Beckman direct assay, respectively. The extended Martin-Hopkins formula had the highest concordance coefficient in both overall and all sublevels of LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and TG. When estimating the LDL-C categories, the highest underestimation degrees were obtained with the Friedewald formula. Our analysis, conducted in a large pediatric population, showed that the extended Martin-Hopkins equation gives more reliable results in estimation of LDL-C compared to other equations.

Magnitude of low-density lipoprotein reduction and impact on major cardiovascular outcomes.

Magnitude of low-density lipoprotein reduction and impact on major cardiovascular outcomes.

Implementing an Innovative Lipid Management Technique Using siRNA LDL-C Lowering Therapy: Lessons Learned in an NHS Primary Care Practice With Worked Case Examples.

The UK Government partnered with industry to tackle cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the first NHS population health agreement. The ambition was to prevent 150 000 strokes, heart attacks and dementia cases over the next 10 years with a new siRNA LDL-C lowering therapy (Inclisiran) delivered within Integrated Care Services by primary care to support a comprehensive approach to lipid management. Following the approval of inclisiran, and guidance published by the National Institute for Health & Care Excellence (NICE) on its use, this paper has been created by a UK general practice to share real-world observations of cases and the potential service benefits of rolling out this innovative drug treatment. The process of identifying patients at risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and lessons learned from implementing in practice is also addressed. Workstreams were developed to rapidly roll out a low clinical burden enhanced lipid management program incorporating siRNA LDL-C lowering therapy into primary care practice. (1) Multi-disciplinary team (MDT) education program based on freely available Academic Health Science Network (AHSN), National Institute for Health & Care Excellence (NICE), and commercial materials. (2) Automated searches using a software program were run to identify "at-risk" patients alongside manual case-finding in everyday clinics. (3) Patients were invited for review using multi-channel modalities. (4) Where appropriate, treatment was commenced after consent was obtained. (5) Automated recall systems are used to ensure follow-up; initially at 3 months, then every 6 months. Enhanced lipid management as a secondary prevention measure is achievable in line with national guidance and objectives. The methodology and education/training processes used in combination with reconstructing the management process can help practice staff realize the program benefits, which in turn can lead to a shift in behavior where all staff embed manual case-finding of high-risk patients into everyday consultations and reviews; enabling rapid identification of eligible patients. Taking a multi-disciplinary, holistic approach to new initiatives reduces service burden, particularly for GPs. Leveraging resources from the AHSN and others removes additional training pressures often associated with new initiatives and provides a wealth of educational material to support primary care MDT upskilling.

Pharmaco-invasive therapy: Early implementation of statins and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors after acute coronary syndrome.

Elevated LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) plays a major role in atheroma formation and inflammation. Medical therapy to lower elevated LDL-C is the cornerstone for reducing the progression of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Statin therapy, and more recently, other drugs such as proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, have proven efficacy in long-term lowering of LDL-C and therefore diminish cardiovascular risk. During an acute coronary syndrome (ACS), a systemic inflammatory response can destabilize other non-culprit atherosclerotic plaques. Patients with these vulnerable plaques are at high risk of experiencing recurrent cardiovascular events in the first few years post-ACS. Initiating intensive LDL-C lowering therapy in these patients with statins or PCSK9 inhibitors can be beneficial via several pathways. High-intensity statin therapy can reduce inflammation by directly lowering LDL-C, but also through its pleiotropic effects. PCSK9 inhibitors can directly lower LDL-C to recommended guideline thresholds, and could have additional effects on inflammation and plaque stability. We discuss the potential role of early implementation of statins combined with PCSK9 inhibitors to influence these cascades and to mediate the associated cardiovascular risk, over and above the well-known long-term beneficial effects of chronic LDL-C lowering.

Lipid Modification to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk in Secondary Prevention Patients with Special Emphasis on PCSK9 Inhibitor Requirement: An Analysis Based on Delphi Panel Approach.

The aim of this study is to analyze the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-lowering therapies in secondary prevention patients by analyzing their plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, current treatment, considering their inadequate response to medications (as defined in current guidelines), and the requirement for a protein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor. Delphi panel is used to seek expert consensus of experienced 12 cardiologists. A questionnaire consisting of 6 main questions is used to reflect the opinion of the expert panelists on the practices of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-lowering therapies of patients with high and very high cardiovascular risk. Patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease are covered in this present analysis. According to expert opinion data, 18.6% of the patient population with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is estimated to have experienced recurrent vascular events. The current treatment of the patient population is 39.7% on high dose, 36.9% on low/moderate dose of statin, 13.1% on maximum tolerated dose statin+ezetimibe, and 1.2% on maximum tolerated dose statin+ezetimibe+protein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor. The percentage of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease patients with inadequate treatment response is estimated to be 20.2% in those using "maximum tolerated dose statin+ezetimibe." The proportion of patients who will need to be treated with a protein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor increases as their low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels rises from 9.1% in 70-99 mg/dL to 50.8% in ≥160 mg/dL for these patients. According to expert opinion, although a substantial proportion of patients with secondary prevention have not achieved low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals, the use of protein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors is very low. Since the questionnaire subject to panel discussion did not include any question elaborating the issue, the discrepancy between the recommendation of the related guidelines and Turkish practice needs further studies for the explanation.

Abstract 11952: Physician Preferences for Treatment of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Among Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease - A Discrete Choice Experiment

Introduction: Around 80% of patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) do not achieve adequate reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in current clinical practice, especially among patients on statin monotherapy. Greater understanding of attributes favored by prescribing physicians may improve treatment outcomes. Methods: To understand attributes of putative statin ‘add-on’ LDL-C lowering therapies, we conducted a discrete choice experiment survey of 200 U.S. cardiologists and 50 primary care physicians (PCPs). The survey presented a series of discrete choices to respondents, systematically varied across 8 treatment attributes: % LDL-C reduction, myalgias, other side effects, route and frequency of administration, time to prior authorization, patient out-of-pocket cost (OOPC) and adherence. Data were analyzed using logistic regression with clustering and heterogeneity adjustments to estimate preference weights for each attribute. Results: Both cardiologists and PCPs most valued efficacy in LDL-C reduction, with odds ratio (OR) for treatment preference of 1.69 per additional 10% reduction in LDL-C, and minimization of monthly OOPC with OR of 0.90 per $10 increase. Cardiologists preferred injectable therapies, with 57.5% of respondents preferring a drug with attributes of a small interfering RNA (siRNA) injectable and 16.4% preferring attributes of a proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 inhibitor (PCSK9i) biologic over oral ezetimibe therapy, as compared to only 2.8% preference for siRNA injectable among PCPs vs. oral therapy. Across all respondents, preference for injectables was higher for patients with history of nonadherence, with 55.7% preferring a drug with health-care practitioner-based injection every 6 months and 25.4% preferring a drug with properties of monoclonal antibody-based home injections once or twice monthly. Conclusions: Results indicate LDL-C lowering efficacy is a primary driver of physician prescribing preferences, with PCPs placing increasing consideration on OOPC. For patients with suboptimal adherence - the majority of those seen in clinical practice - U.S. physicians are more likely to prefer less-frequent injectable to oral therapies.

Integrated guidance to enhance the care of children and adolescents with familial hypercholesterolaemia: Practical advice for the community clinician.

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a highly penetrant monogenic disorder present from birth that markedly elevates plasma low‐density lipoprotein (LDL)‐cholesterol (LDL‐C) concentration and, if untreated, leads to premature atherosclerosis and coronary artery disease (CAD). At a prevalence of 1:250 individuals, with over 90% undiagnosed, recent estimates suggest that there are approximately 22 000 children and adolescents with FH in Australia and New Zealand. However, the overwhelming majority remain undetected and inadequately treated until adulthood or after their first cardiac event. The guidance in this paper aims to increase awareness about paediatric FH and provide practical advice for the diagnosis and management of FH in children and adolescents. Recommendations are given on the detection, diagnosis, assessment and management of FH in children and adolescents. Recommendations are also made on genetic testing, including counselling and the potential for universal screening programmes. Practical guidance on management includes treatment of non‐cholesterol risk factors, and safe and appropriate use of LDL‐C lowering therapies, including statins, ezetimibe, PCSK9 inhibitors and lipoprotein apheresis. Models of care for FH need to be adapted to local and regional health care needs and available resources. Targeting the detection of FH as a priority in children and young adults has the potential to alter the natural history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and recognise the promise of early detection for improving long‐term health outcomes. A comprehensive implementation strategy, informed by further research, including assessments of cost–benefit, will be required to ensure that this new guidance benefits all families with or at risk of FH.

Adherence to lipid monitoring and its impact on treatment intensification of LDL-C lowering therapies at an urban academic medical center

Lipid monitoring is recommended by treatment guidelines to assess efficacy and adherence to lipid lowering therapy, but the available data is mostly limited to integrated health delivery systems with less diverse populations. To determine the proportion of patients that completed appropriate lipid monitoring at an urban academic medical center and whether lipid monitoring is associated with treatment intensification. Adults prescribed ≥1 LDL-C lowering therapy and with ≥1 outpatient encounter during 2018 and 2019 were included. Appropriate lipid monitoring was defined as ≥1 lipid panel obtained during the 12 month follow up period. Treatment intensification was defined as a dose increase, change to a higher intensity statin, or addition of a new LDL-C lowering therapy. The association between lipid monitoring and treatment intensification were assessed using regression models. Of the 12,332 patients on LDL-C lowering therapy, 88% had ≥1 lipid panel. The average patient was 60 years of age, 50% were female, and 50% identified as black or African American. On regression analysis (odds ratio [OR], 95% confidence interval [CI]), lipid monitoring occurred less frequently in adults >75 years of age (0.63, 0.44 to 0.90), black or African American individuals (0.78, 0.69 to 0.89), and those insured by Medicaid (0.72, 0.61 to 0.86). The odds of treatment intensification steadily increased with the number of lipid panels compared to those without lipid monitoring. Lipid monitoring is associated with treatment intensification but occurs less frequently in adults >75 years of age, black or African American individuals, and those insured by Medicaid.