Loss Of Body Hair Research Articles

Patient-Reported Hair Loss and Its Impacts as Measured by the Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes Instrument in Patients Treated with Ritlecitinib: The ALLEGRO Phase 2b/3 Randomized Clinical Trial.

The ALLEGRO phase 2b/3 study investigated the efficacy and safety of ritlecitinib in patients with alopecia areata (AA). To describe the impact of ritlecitinib on patient-reported hair loss using the Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) instrument and evaluate the relationship between clinically meaningful hair regrowth and improvements in patient-reported impacts. In ALLEGRO-2b/3, patients aged ≥ 12 years with AA and ≥ 50% scalp hair loss received once-daily ritlecitinib 50 or 30 mg (± 4-week 200-mg daily loading dose), 10 mg, or placebo for 24 weeks andthen continued ritlecitinib or switched from placebo to ritlecitinib 200/50 or 50 mg for 24 weeks. The AAPPO instrument evaluated improvement in hair loss, emotional symptoms (ES), and activity limitations (AL) from weeks 4 to 48 (secondary endpoint). Mean changes in ES and AL domain scores and individual items at weeks 24 and 48 were calculated for Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score ≤ 20 responders and nonresponders (exploratory endpoint). Overall, 718 patients were randomized. At week 24, 5-36% of patients receiving ritlecitinib 10-200/50 mg reported improvement in scalp hair loss versus 9% receiving placebo. The results for eyebrow, eyelash, and body hair loss were similar. Mean change from baseline in ES and AL scores at weeks 24 and 48 was small and similar between groups. Mean change was larger for individual hair loss and ES items at weeks 24 and 48 in SALT score ≤ 20 responders versus nonresponders. The AAPPO instrument demonstrated the beneficial impact of ritlecitinib on patient-reported hair growth, which was consistent with improvements in clinician-reported outcomes. NCT03732807. INFOGRAPHIC.

Alopecia Areata Treatment Patterns and Satisfaction: Results of a Real-World Cross-Sectional Survey in Europe.

Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune disease that causes scalp, face, and/or body hair loss. Recently, oral treatments with kinases inhibition became the first approved therapies for severe AA. An understanding of the use and effectiveness of traditional therapies in real-world treatment settings is needed to guide integration of novel therapies into the treatment paradigm. This study aimed to describe traditional treatment patterns, dermatologists' reasons for therapy choice, and dermatologists' satisfaction with disease control among patients with AA. Data were drawn from the 2021-2022 Adelphi Real World AA Disease Specific Programme™, a cross-sectional survey of dermatologists and adult patients with AA, conducted in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK. For each patient, using data from patient consultation and medical records, dermatologists reported % scalp hair loss (SHL), characteristics of current and prior AA therapies, and satisfaction with disease control. Overall, 239 dermatologists provided data for 1720 patients with AA. Mean (SD) patient age was 35.8 (11.6) years, and 51% were male. Based on dermatologist perception, among patients with ≤ 10% SHL, 74% were experiencing mild AA, while ≥ 95% of patients with ≥ 50% SHL were experiencing severe/very severe AA. In patients with ≥ 50% SHL, the most common therapies received included systemic immunosuppressants (31%), topical corticosteroids (24%), and oral corticosteroids (24%). Among all patients who had switched therapies, 49%, 26%, and 24% switched because of worsening AA, lack of initial efficacy with prior treatment, and loss of response over time, respectively. Among those with SHL ≥ 50%, dermatologists reported satisfaction with current therapy in < 30% of patients. Dermatologists reported low satisfaction with traditional AA therapies used in patients with extensive SHL, with some patients discontinuing treatment because of worsening disease. This suggests more effective treatments are needed for patients with severe AA.

The Androgen Deprivation Therapy Landscape in 2024 – Co-navigating the Available Options with Prostate Cancer Patients

This symposium convened during the 2024 European Association of Urology (EAU) Congress in Paris, France, focusing on the multifaceted aspects of prostate cancer (PCa) treatment from the patient’s perspective. The session delved into the nuanced needs, expectations, and treatment experiences encountered by individuals diagnosed with this condition. A pivotal aspect of the discussion centred on the imperative of ensuring patient awareness and informed consent, particularly concerning androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), given its array of potential side effects. ADT, a cornerstone in advanced PCa management, encompasses a spectrum of side effects including both physical and psychological dimensions. These include, but are not limited to, body hair loss, weight fluctuations, mood alterations, decreased libido, cognitive impairments, muscle atrophy, and bone density loss. Effective management of these side effects requires comprehensive support to be provided to patients to mitigate complications and optimise quality of life. The options for ADT were discussed, with their comparative strengths and challenges. ADT strategies take effect over different time periods (from 12 hours up to 4 weeks), exert varying effects on testosterone levels, and carry different side effect profiles. Selecting the optimal course of treatment for localised or locally advanced PCa requires consideration of whether the patient is at intermediate-, high-, or very high-risk of biochemical recurrence, and whether the intermediate-risk disease is classified as favourable intermediate-risk (FIR) or unfavourable intermediate-risk (UIR). While continuous ADT is the standard of care, intermittent ADT has been associated with significantly better quality of life scores for hot flushes, desire for sexual activity, and urinary symptoms, with a trend toward improvement in the level of fatigue. Furthermore, the interplay between PCa, ADT, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) was discussed to underscore the imperative for clinicians to assess the cardiovascular risks associated with ADT, particularly in patients with heightened cardiovascular vulnerability. Mitigating the adverse skeletal effects of ADT mandates a multifaceted approach encompassing nutritional supplementation, exercise regimens, and lifestyle modifications including alcohol cessation and smoking cessation. Integrating a prehabilitation checklist into clinical practice emerges as a pragmatic strategy to facilitate informed discussions regarding the potential adverse effects of ADT, enabling proactive support provision to optimise patient outcomes.

Genetic Polymorphisms of Immunity Regulatory Genes and Alopecia Areata Susceptibility in Jordanian Patients

Background and Objectives: Alopecia areata (AA) is a tissue-specific immune-mediated disorder that affects hair follicles and the nail apparatus. Due to the collapse of hair follicle immune privilege in AA, hair loss ranges in severity from small, localized patches on the scalp to the loss of entire body hair. Although AA is of uncertain etiology, the disease has a common genetic basis with a number of other autoimmune diseases. Materials and Methods: To identify candidate genes that confer susceptibility to AA in the Jordanian population and further understand the disease background, we performed DNA genotyping using case–control samples of 152 patients and 150 healthy subjects. Results: While no significant result was observed in the ten single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), CLEC4D rs4304840 variants showed significant associations with AA development within our cohort (p = 0.02). The strongest associations were for the codominant and recessive forms of rs4304840 (p = 0.023 and p = 0.0061, respectively). Conclusions: These findings suggest that CLEC4D gene variants may contribute to AA pathogenesis among Jordanians. Further advanced genetic analysis and functional investigations are required to elucidate the genetic basis of the disease.

Efficacy of modern methods for assessing the severity of alopecia areata

Purpose of the study. To evaluate the effectiveness of the standardized SALT scale to determine the severity of AA patients.Materials and methods. A one-time retrospective cohort study was conducted. There were 40 patients with AA under supervision. The gender distribution of the patients was as follows: 15 men (36.6%) and 25 (63.3%) women. The average age was 29.4 years in the 18–54 age range.Results. The AA debut varied widely in age range from 2 to 45 years. The average age at which the pathological process began was 18,2±4,4 years. 22.4% of patients with a scalp hair area of more than 25%, as well as hair loss in other areas of the body and changes in the nail.The beginning of AA is fixed to 10 years. More than two relapses occurred in 54.5% of patients with scalp hair lesions of more than 25% and only 9.2% of cases with foetal AA.The following clinical forms were diagnosed: foetal (12 patients), lenticular (ophiasis, inversive ophiasis) (7 patients), multi-focal (11 patients), total and universal (10 patients). According to the SBN Hair Loss State scale, S1 clinically corresponded to focal alopecia, S2 -S4 – ophazis, multi-focal alopecia, S5 – TA and UA. Partial or complete hair loss has been noted in these areas in 38% of patients with S2-S3 and 67% with S4-S5 clinical forms. The combination of different degrees of body hair loss and dystrophy of nail plates in examined AA patients was observed in 25% of cases.Conclusion. In determining the severity of alopecia nest principally not only the size and number of lesions on the skin scalp, but also the nature of hair loss on the skin of the eyebrows and eyelashes, as well as the possible combination of hair loss and dystrophic altered nail plates, which is considered an option for a more severe course of the disease. The SBN system effectively evaluates and describes the clinical variant of AA according to a standardized scale, which can help determine clinical management of patients with different manifestations, as well as predict the course of the disease.

Deciphering the Complex Immunopathogenesis of Alopecia Areata.

Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune-mediated disorder in which the proximal hair follicle (HF) attack results in non-scarring partial to total scalp or body hair loss. Despite the growing knowledge about AA, its exact cause still needs to be understood. However, immunity and genetic factors are affirmed to be critical in AA development. While the genome-wide association studies proved the innate and acquired immunity involvement, AA mouse models implicated the IFN-γ- and cytotoxic CD8+ T-cell-mediated immune response as the main drivers of disease pathogenesis. The AA hair loss is caused by T-cell-mediated inflammation in the HF area, disturbing its function and disrupting the hair growth cycle without destroying the follicle. Thus, the loss of HF immune privilege, autoimmune HF destruction mediated by cytotoxic mechanisms, and the upregulation of inflammatory pathways play a crucial role. AA is associated with concurrent systemic and autoimmune disorders such as atopic dermatitis, vitiligo, psoriasis, and thyroiditis. Likewise, the patient's quality of life (QoL) is significantly impaired by morphologic disfigurement caused by the illness. The patients experience a negative impact on psychological well-being and self-esteem and may be more likely to suffer from psychiatric comorbidities. This manuscript aims to present the latest knowledge on the pathogenesis of AA, which involves genetic, epigenetic, immunological, and environmental factors, with a particular emphasis on immunopathogenesis.

ADAM17 variant causes hair loss via ubiquitin ligase TRIM47-mediated degradation.

Hypotrichosis is a genetic disorder characterized by a diffuse and progressive loss of scalp and/or body hair. Nonetheless, the causative genes for several affected individuals remain elusive, and the underlying mechanisms have yet to be fully elucidated. Here, we discovered a dominant variant in a disintegrin and a metalloproteinase domain 17 (ADAM17) gene caused hypotrichosis with woolly hair. Adam17 (p.D647N) knockin mice mimicked the hair abnormality in patients. ADAM17 (p.D647N) mutation led to hair follicle stem cell (HFSC) exhaustion and caused abnormal hair follicles, ultimately resulting in alopecia. Mechanistic studies revealed that ADAM17 binds directly to E3 ubiquitin ligase tripartite motif-containing protein 47 (TRIM47). ADAM17 variant enhanced the association between ADAM17 and TRIM47, leading to an increase in ubiquitination and subsequent degradation of ADAM17 protein. Furthermore, reduced ADAM17 protein expression affected the Notch signaling pathway, impairing the activation, proliferation, and differentiation of HFSCs during hair follicle regeneration. Overexpression of Notch intracellular domain rescued the reduced proliferation ability caused by Adam17 variant in primary fibroblast cells.

European expert consensus statement on the systemic treatment of alopecia areata.

Alopecia areata is an autoimmune form of non-scarring hair loss. It is usually characterized by limited areas of hair loss. However, the disease may progress to complete scalp and body hair loss (alopecia totalis, alopecia universalis). In patients with alopecia areata hair loss significantly impacts the quality of life. Children and adolescents with alopecia areata often experience bullying, including physical aggression. The disease severity evaluation tools used in clinical practice are: the Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score and the Alopecia Areata Scale (AAS). A SALT score equal to or greater than 20 constitutes a commonly accepted indication for systemic therapy in alopecia areata. When using the AAS, moderate to severe alopecia areata should be considered a medical indication for systemic treatment. Currently, the only two EMA-approved medications for alopecia areata are baricitinib (JAK 1/2 inhibitor) for adults and ritlecitinib (JAK 3/TEC inhibitor) for individuals aged 12 and older. Both are EMA-approved for patients with severe alopecia areata. Other systemic medications used off-label in alopecia areata include glucocorticosteroids, cyclosporine, methotrexate and azathioprine. Oral minoxidil is considered an adjuvant therapy with limited data confirming its possible efficacy. This consensus statement is to outline a systemic treatment algorithm for alopecia areata, indications for systemic treatment, available therapeutic options, their efficacy and safety, as well as the duration of the therapy.

Patients' experiences of primary healthcare and dermatology provision for alopecia.

Alopecia describes a group of dermatological conditions characterised by hair loss, which are either non-scarring or scarring in nature, and range from bald patches to complete body hair loss, to general thinning. In the UK, the General Practitioner (GP) is typically the first point of contact, and some patients are referred for specialist dermatology consultation. However, little is known about how individuals with alopecia in the UK experience the care provided by the National Health Service. We aimed to understand patients' perceptions of primary healthcare and dermatology provision. Further, we aimed to investigate how care provision and patients' overall patient journey might be improved in the UK, and how these lessons may apply internationally. An online mixed methods survey was distributed by Alopecia UK to UK-based individuals with alopecia. Open-ended text responses were analysed using qualitative content analysis. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive analyses and dependent measures t-tests. A total of 291 participants completed the survey. They reported neutral-to-partial dissatisfaction with their GP appointments, with greater satisfaction in their most recent compared to their first appointment. Participants highlighted positive experiences with GPs and dermatologists as well as areas for improvement. Participants also expressed a desire for a greater degree of support and understanding about the psychological impact of alopecia. Results highlight the importance of being empathic and caring healthcare professionals for patients with alopecia, the need for training for GPs on alopecia, as well as a simplified and joined up pathway between primary and secondary healthcare.

Effectiveness of oral tofacitinib treatment on patients with moderate-to-severe alopecia areata in Iran.

Alopecia areata is an inflammatory hair loss and a common autoimmune disease. Conducting treatment studies on alopecia areata is difficult due to unpredictable periods and even spontaneous recovery from the disease. In this study, the effectiveness of tofacitinib in treating alopecia areata was investigated. The severity of the disease was evaluated using the Alopecia Severity Tool (SALT), and based on the medical history and patient's documents and photos, the score before and after the treatment was obtained. The patients were prescribed tofacitinib tablets at a dose of 5 mg twice a day for at least 6 months and were followed for a minimum of 18 months. No side effect was observed in 97.9% of the patients. After 6 months, except for three patients who did not need any maintenance dose, others needed an average daily intake of 7 mg of tofacitinib. After 18 months, the hair loss decreased by 6.45 times compared to the beginning and by 0.5 times compared to the end of 6 months (p < 0.05). In addition, it was found that body hair loss decreased 4 times compared to the beginning and 0.6 times compared to the end of 6 months (p < 0.05). The reduction of nail involvement after 18 months and 6 months was 1.2 times and 0.6, respectively, (p < 0.05). Treatment of alopecia areata with tofacitinib is recommended due to its effectiveness in reducing hair loss on the head, body, and nail involvement with few reversible side effects.

Inhibition of T-cell activity in alopecia areata: recent developments and new directions.

Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune disease that has a complex underlying immunopathogenesis characterized by nonscarring hair loss ranging from small bald patches to complete loss of scalp, face, and/or body hair. Although the etiopathogenesis of AA has not yet been fully characterized, immune privilege collapse at the hair follicle (HF) followed by T-cell receptor recognition of exposed HF autoantigens by autoreactive cytotoxic CD8+ T cells is now understood to play a central role. Few treatment options are available, with the Janus kinase (JAK) 1/2 inhibitor baricitinib (2022) and the selective JAK3/tyrosine kinase expressed in hepatocellular carcinoma (TEC) inhibitor ritlecitinib (2023) being the only US Food and Drug Administration-approved systemic medications thus far for severe AA. Several other treatments are used off-label with limited efficacy and/or suboptimal safety and tolerability. With an increased understanding of the T-cell-mediated autoimmune and inflammatory pathogenesis of AA, additional therapeutic pathways beyond JAK inhibition are currently under investigation for the development of AA therapies. This narrative review presents a detailed overview about the role of T cells and T-cell-signaling pathways in the pathogenesis of AA, with a focus on those pathways targeted by drugs in clinical development for the treatment of AA. A detailed summary of new drugs targeting these pathways with expert commentary on future directions for AA drug development and the importance of targeting multiple T-cell-signaling pathways is also provided in this review.

The Efficacy and Adverse Effects of Corticosteroid Pulse Therapy in Alopecia Areata: A Review Article.

Alopecia areata (AA) is a common, non-scarring, autoimmune hair loss disorder, varying in severity from small round hairless patches to the total loss of scalp or body hair. As steroid pulse therapy outcomes for AA vary, this study aimed to review the related literature regarding the efficacy, relapse rates, side effects, and prognostic factors associated with the response to different pulse corticosteroid treatments. We performed a literature search on August 29, 2022, to provide an overview of the efficacy of pulse steroid therapy in patients with AA. The terms "pulse steroid therapy AND alopecia areata" and "pulse corticosteroid therapy AND alopecia areata" were searched on PubMed and Google Scholar. A total of 24 articles were assessed. There was no difference in outcomes and side effects between intravenous and oral pulse corticosteroid therapy. The relapse rate and efficacy depended on the time of AA onset, age, and AA type: improved outcomes and decreased relapse were linked with recent onset (<6 months), a younger age (<10 years), and the multifocal type of AA. Patients with a past medical history of atopy, nail pitting, or thyroid disease and those with severe forms of AA like alopecia totalis and alopecia universalis had the least improvement. All kinds of mentioned systemic pulse corticosteroids effectively induce hair regrowth in AA. Betamethasone pulse seems to be the most effective agent (followed by intramuscular triamcinolone), especially in severe cases, but more side effects may accompany it. Combining this agent with other medications can reduce the dosage and side effects. Pulses of prednisolone and methylprednisolone are less effective but safer, as they have low relapse rates and adverse effects. A combination of them with other drugs can increase their efficacy.

Epidemiology of alopecia areata and population-wide comorbidities in Germany: analysis of longitudinal claimsdata.

Alopecia areata (AA) is a chronic, immune-mediated disease characterized by acute-onset hair loss. The hair loss can range from small, circumscribed hairless areas on the scalp to complete loss of hair on the head and body hair. However, data on the epidemiology of AA are limited. Current evaluations are lacking in Germany. The aim of this study was to evaluate the epidemiology and comorbidity of AA in Germany based on claims data. A representative 40% sample of all adults who were insured with a German statutory health insurance company (DAK-Gesundheit) between 2016 and 2020 was evaluated (n = 2.88 million). Based on at least one relevant outpatient or inpatient diagnosis of International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 L63, the annual AA prevalence and incidence (ICD-10 L63) were calculated for 2016 to 2020. Different case definitions were used for diagnosis validation. In addition, the occurrence of comorbidities in patients with AA was investigated. In 2020, AA prevalence was 210 cases per 100 000 and incidence 72 cases per 100 000. Compared with persons without AA, those with AA significantly more often had atopic dermatitis [rate ratio (RR) 2.9], pruritus (RR 2.7), lupus erythematosus (RR 2.4), urticaria (RR2.3) and psoriasis (RR 2.2). Women were affected slightly more often than men (0.2% vs. 0.1%). On a regional level, higher prevalence and incidence rates were found in Brandenburg (prevalence 332 cases per 100 000; incidence 116 cases per 100 000), Hesse (prevalence 344cases per 100 000; incidence 124 cases per 100 000) and Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania (prevalence 303 cases per 100 000; incidence 111per100 000). AA is a common immune-mediated skin condition with marked regional variations in Germany. For a complete understanding of epidemiology, complementary population-based studies including clinical characteristics of AA are useful.

의복의 기원과 발달에 관한 연구

This study aimed to provide basic humanistic data for clothing education by shedding light on&#x0D; the origins and historical development of clothing. The study’s content encompassed the evolution of&#x0D; mankind, the origin of clothing, and the development of clothing during the Paleolithic Age. The&#x0D; study was conducted in the form of a literature review.&#x0D; The study revealed several key findings. First, the evolutionary processes of Hospitalophithecus,&#x0D; Homo habilis, Homo erectus, and Homo sapiens were characterized by constitutions such as 'bipedal&#x0D; locomotion (upright walking),’ 'enhanced manual dexterity and tool-making abilities,’ ‘expansion of&#x0D; brain capacity', and the 'reduction of body hair'. Enemy Evolution and 'Move Out of Africa'. This&#x0D; progression ultimately led to the emergence of Homo erectus, the first archaic hominid to move out&#x0D; of Africa with all the hallmarks of physical evolution. Subsequently, more advanced Neanderthals&#x0D; and, later, Homo sapiens arrived in Europe about 50,000 years ago. Homo sapiens exhibited modern&#x0D; human attributes, including high cognitive functions and the sophisticated development of the body&#x0D; and hands.&#x0D; Second, considering the constitutional characteristics of human evolution, the migration of early&#x0D; humans from Africa to colder regions, and the loss of body hair, it is estimated that the earliest&#x0D; forms of clothing were worn by Homo erectus between 1.8 million and 1 million years ago.&#x0D; Third, the evolution of clothing during the Paleolithic period saw the development of fur waist&#x0D; covers by Homo erectus, followed by the adoption of sloppy fur pants and tops by Neanderthal.&#x0D; Homo sapiens, characterized by their cognitive prowess, advanced clothing by tailoring clothes using&#x0D; needles. In the Late Paleolithic period, marked by cultural characteristics, clothing evolved to&#x0D; include not only the weaving of cellulose fibers and the basic structural elements seen in&#x0D; contemporary clothing, but it also reached a level of sophistication with neat and elaborate&#x0D; decorations.

Hair Loss Profiles and Ritlecitinib Efficacy in Patients with Alopecia Areata: Post Hoc Analysis of the ALLEGRO Phase 2b/3 Study.

Ritlecitinib demonstrated efficacy in patients with alopecia areata (AA) in the ALLEGRO phase 2b/3 study (NCT03732807). However, hair loss presentation may vary based on location (e.g., scalp, eyebrow/eyelash, body). Here, we sought to identify distinct hair loss profiles at baseline and evaluate whether they affected the efficacy of ritlecitinib. Patients with AA aged ≥ 12years with ≥ 50% scalp hair loss were randomized to daily ritlecitinib 10mg (assessed for dose ranging only), 30 or 50mg (± 4-week, 200-mg loading dose), or placebo for 24weeks. Latent class analysis (LCA) identified hair loss profiles based on four baseline measurements: clinician-reported extent of scalp (Severity of Alopecia Tool score), eyebrow hair loss, eyelash hair loss, and patient-reported body hair loss. Logistic regression evaluated ritlecitinib (50 and 30mg) efficacy vs placebo using Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) and Patient Satisfaction with Hair Growth (P-Sat; amount, quality, and overall satisfaction) responses at Week 24, adjusting for key covariates, including latent class membership. LCA identified five latent classes: (1) primarily non-alopecia totalis (AT; complete loss of scalp hair); (2) non-AT with moderate non-scalp involvement; (3) extensive scalp, eyebrow, and eyelash involvement; (4) AT with moderate non-scalp involvement;and (5) primarily alopecia universalis (complete scalp, face, and body hair loss). Adjusting for latent class membership, patients receiving ritlecitinib 30 or 50mg were significantly more likely to achieve PGI-C response (30mg: odds ratio, 8.62 [95% confidence interval, 4.42-18.08]; 50mg: 12.29 [6.29-25.85]) and P-Sat quality of hair regrowth (30mg: 6.71 [3.53-13.51]; 50mg: 8.17 [4.30-16.46]) vs placebo at Week 24. Results were similar for P-Sat overall satisfaction and amount of hair regrowth. Distinct and clinically relevant hair loss profiles were identified in ALLEGRO-2b/3 participants. Ritlecitinib was efficacious compared with placebo, independent of hair loss profile at baseline. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03732807.

Alopecia Areata: The Clinician and Patient Voice.

Alopecia areata (AA), an autoimmune disorder of hair follicles, results in varying degrees of scalp, facial, and body hair loss. In addition, it is associated with profound psychosocial and quality-of-life impairments, which can lead to anxiety and depression. The clinical course is unpredictable, with spontaneous remissions and relapses. There is no cure, and current treatments are limited by their efficacy, safety, and high relapse rates after discontinuation. This article reviews clinician and patient perspectives on AA, based on clinician and physician surveys, and discusses the unmet needs and gaps in care. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(10 Suppl):s5-10.

Alopecia Areata: Current Treatments and New Directions.

Alopecia areata is an autoimmune hair loss disease that is non-scarring and is characterized by chronic inflammation at the hair follicle level. Clinically, patients' presentation varies from patchy, circumscribed scalp involvement to total body and scalp hair loss. Current management is guided by the degree of scalp and body involvement, with topical and intralesional steroid injections as primarily first-line for mild cases and broad immunosuppressants as the mainstay for more severe cases. Until recently, the limited number of blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials for this disease had made establishing an evidence-based treatment paradigm challenging. However, growing insights into the pathogenesis of alopecia areata through blood and tissue analysis of human lesions have identified several promising targets for therapy. T-helper (Th)1/interferon skewing has traditionally been described as the driver of disease; however, recent investigations suggest activation of additional immune mediators, including the Th2 pathway, interleukin (IL)-9, IL-23, and IL-32, as contributors to alopecia areata pathogenesis. The landscape of alopecia areata treatment has the potential to be transformed, as several novel targeted drugs are currently undergoing clinical trials. Given the recent US FDA approval of baricitiniband ritlecitinib, Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are a promising drug class for treating severe alopecia areata cases. This article will review the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of current treatments for alopecia areata, and will provide an overview of the emerging therapies that are leading the revolution in the management of this challenging disease.

Treatment Response to Diphenylcyclopropenone in Patients with Alopecia Totalis/Universalis.

Alopecia totalis (AT) and Alopecia universalis (AU) are forms of Alopecia areata (AA) which represent the strongest predictor of poor prognosis since spontaneous regrowth is <10%. Topical immunotherapy agent, diphenylcyclopropenone (DPCP) has shown clinical efficacy with limited side effects in severe forms of AA. However, its specific role in AT/AU characterized by complete hair loss over the scalp can help highlight the efficacy of the drug with fewer confounders. Data were collected from 18 patients diagnosed with AT/AU and treated with topical immunotherapy with DPCP as per protocol by Happle et al. Baseline Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score and subclass was recorded. In the case of AU, baseline body hair loss score was also recorded. Patients were reassessed after 6 months of treatment in terms of change in SALT score and hair regrowth was assessed using the Global Assessment Score. The side effects during treatment were also assessed and recorded. Eighteen patients of whom eleven (61.1%) were diagnosed as AU and seven (38.9%) as AT were treated. The mean age was 21.6, with a male: female ratio of 3:2. The comorbidities noted were atopy in six (33.3%), atopy and hypothyroidism in one (5.5%), Down's syndrome in two (11.1%), and hypothyroidism alone in one (5.5%) patient. The mean duration of disease at the time of presentation was 3 years and all patients had remained refractory to various other modalities of treatment. All patients had a baseline SALT score of 100 corresponding to S5. After 6 months of treatment, 27.7% of patients did not show any response (SALT score S5), 16.6% had a score of S4, 11.1% had a score of S3, 11.1% had a score of S2, 22.2% had a score of S1, and 11.1% had a score of S0. On assessing improvement in body hair loss score, 36.3% of patients showed no improvement, 36.3% showed partial improvement, and 27.2% of patients showed complete body hair regrowth. About 55.5% of patients developed notable side effects that included severe local reactions, cervical lymphadenopathy, acne and pigmentation at the site of application as well as untreated sites. The AT/AU subtypes of AA, was amenable to treatment with contact immunotherapeutic agent DPCP with a >75% hair regrowth in 33.3% of patients. The castling phenomenon was seen in 63.6% of AU patients. The adverse effects noted were not severe enough to deter treatment.

BG01 Confirming small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptide E as a cause of nonsyndromic hypotrichosis

Abstract Hereditary nonsyndromic hypotrichosis comprises at least 15 genetically distinct but phenotypically overlapping disorders. Affected individuals generally have hair at birth, which sheds during infancy or childhood. Severity ranges from partial alopecia to complete loss of scalp and body hair, with phenotypic variability between and within families. Genetic testing is essential for accurate diagnosis and counselling. We describe a case where several factors contributed to a delay in genetic diagnosis. A female child of nonconsanguineous White parents was born at term with normal hair that started to shed at 2 weeks of age. By 6 weeks of age, there was a complete absence of scalp, eyelash and eyebrow hair. There was no relevant family history apart from atopy. On examination at 3.3 years of age, she had total alopecia apart from some hairs in the external auditory canals. Nails, teeth and sweating were normal. She appeared developmentally normal and healthy apart from mild eczema with persistent erythema on both cheeks. The differential diagnosis included autoimmune alopecia and genetic nonsyndromic hypotrichosis. She was recruited to the 100 000 Genomes Project, but primary analysis did not identify any causative variants. Reanalysis using a limited gene-agnostic approach identified heterozygosity for the c.1A&amp;gt;G; p.(Met1?) variant in small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptide E (SNRPE) that was not present in parents. This variant is not present in the gnomAD population database and is predicted to alter the initiation codon of SNRPE. It has been reported de novo in a British girl with sparse scalp hair and eyelashes and absent eyebrows, and in eight affected members of a Spanish family whose phenotypes ranged from sparse eyebrows and eyelashes to complete alopecia (Pasternack SM, Refke M, Paknia E et al. Mutations in SNRPE, which encodes a core protein of the spliceosome, cause autosomal dominant hypertrichosis simplex. Am J Hum Genet 2013; 92:81–7). This condition has been designated hypotrichosis type 11. SNRPE encodes a core protein of U small nuclear ribonucleoproteins, which are essential to the removal of introns from pre-mRNA and thus critical for the post-transcriptional modification of RNA. In our case, review of the primary analysis showed that the incorrect gene panel was applied (‘familial cicatricial alopecia’ instead of ‘nonsyndromic hypotrichosis’) and that SNRPE was listed as ‘amber’ for hypotrichosis, meaning ‘moderate evidence for this gene–disease association and should not yet be used for genome interpretation’. Genomics England has now incorporated nonsyndromic hypotrichosis into the ‘ectodermal dysplasia’ panel, with SNRPE now listed as ‘green’ for hypotrichosis 11, meaning a ‘high level of evidence for this gene–disease association’. This case emphasizes the importance of revisiting negative results as knowledge evolves.

Efficacy and safety of ritlecitinib in adults and adolescents with alopecia areata: a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 2b–3 trial

Alopecia areata is characterised by non-scarring loss of scalp, face, or body hair. We investigated the efficacy and safety of ritlecitinib, an oral, selective dual JAK3/TEC family kinase inhibitor, in patients with alopecia areata. In this randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 2b-3 trial done at 118 sites in 18 countries, patients aged 12 years and older with alopecia areata and at least 50% scalp hair loss were randomly assigned to oral ritlecitinib or placebo once-daily for 24 weeks, with or without a 4-week loading dose (50 mg, 30 mg, 10 mg, 200 mg loading dose followed by 50 mg, or 200 mg loading dose followed by 30 mg), followed by a 24-week extension period during which ritlecitinib groups continued their assigned doses and patients initially assigned to placebo switched to ritlecitinib 50 mg or 200 mg loading dose followed by 50 mg. Randomisation was done by use of an interactive response system and was stratified by baseline disease severity and age. The sponsor, patients, and investigators were masked to treatment, and all patients received the same number of tablets to maintain masking. The primary endpoint was Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score 20 or less at week 24. The primary endpoint was assessed in all assigned patients, regardless of whether they received treatment. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03732807. Between Dec 3, 2018, and June 24, 2021, 1097 patients were screened and 718 were randomly assigned to receive ritlecitinib 200 mg + 50 mg (n=132), 200 mg + 30 mg (n=130), 50 mg (n=130), 30 mg (n=132), 10 mg (n=63), placebo to 50 mg (n=66), or placebo to 200 mg + 50 mg (n=65). 446 (62%) of 718 patients were female and 272 (38%) were male. 488 (68%) were White, 186 (26%) were Asian, and 27 (4%) were Black or African American. Of 718 patients randomly assigned, 104 patients discontinued treatment (34 withdrew, 19 adverse events [AEs], 12 physician decision, 12 lack of efficacy, 13 lost to follow up, five rolled over to long-term study transfer, four pregnancies, two protocol deviations, one declined to attend follow-up due to COVID-19, one attended last visit very late due to COVID-19, and one non-compliance). At week 24, 38 (31%) of 124 patients in the ritlecitinib 200 mg + 50 mg group, 27 (22%) of 121 patients in the 200 mg + 30 mg group, 29 (23%) of 124 patients in the 50 mg group, 17 (14%) of 119 patients in the 30 mg group, and two (2%) of 130 patients in the placebo group had a response based on SALT score 20 or less. The difference in response rate based on SALT score 20 or less between the placebo and the ritlecitinib 200 mg + 50 mg group was 29·1% (95% CI 21·2-37·9; p<0·0001), 20·8% (13·7-29·2; p<0·0001) for the 200 mg + 30 mg group, 21·9% (14·7-30·2; p<0·0001) for the 50 mg group, and 12·8% (6·7-20·4; p=0·0002) for the 30 mg group. Up to week 48 and including the follow-up period, AEs had been reported in 108 (82%) of 131 patients in the ritlecitinib 200 mg + 50 mg group, 105 (81%) of 129 patients in the 200 mg + 30 mg group, 110 (85%) of 130 patients in the 50 mg group, 106 (80%) of 132 patients in the 30 mg group, 47 (76%) of 62 patients in the 10 mg group, 54 (83%) of 65 patients placebo to ritlecitinib 200 mg + 50 mg in the extension period, and 57 (86%) of 66 patients in the placebo to 50 mg group. The incidence of each AE was similar between groups, and there were no deaths. Ritlecitinib was effective and well tolerated in patients aged 12 years and older with alopecia areata. Ritlecitinib might be a suitable treatment option for alopecia areata in patients who are candidates for systemic therapy. Pfizer.