Lordosis Correction Research Articles

Cervical Lordosis Correction and Segmental Height in Anterior Cervical Surgeries; The Role of Implant Choice

This study aims to compare the impact of three surgical techniques-stand-alone cage placement (SAC), anterior cervical plate (ACP) fixation, and total disc replacement (TDR)-on cervical lordosis restoration and segmental height after anterior cervical discectomy at C5-6 level. To eliminate the effect of lordosis between different levels, patients operated on at the same level were included in the study. Restoring cervical lordosis is crucial for improving patient outcomes, including pain reduction and preventing mechanical complications. A retrospective screening of 89 patients who underwent single-level C5-6 surgery between 2011 and 2021 was analyzed. Patients were categorized into three groups based on the surgical technique used: SAC, ACP, or TDR. Lordotic angles and segmental heights were measured preoperatively, first-month follow-up, and at the 24-month follow-up. Statistical analysis was conducted using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank test and ANOVA, with a significance threshold set at P<.05. All three techniques resulted in significant early and late postoperative increases in both global and segmental lordosis. The early postoperative height gain was most pronounced in the ACP group. However, no significant differences in lordosis or height preservation were observed among the groups at the 24-month follow-up. These findings align with previous studies, indicating comparable long-term outcomes across these surgical approaches. Stand-alone cage placement, anterior cervical plate fixation, and total disc replacement all effectively restore cervical lordosis and segmental height after anterior cervical discectomy at the C5-6 level. Despite early differences, the long-term results were similar, suggesting that the choice of technique should be based on individual patient needs and specific surgical considerations.

Factors associated with rod fracture following surgery for adult spinal deformity: a single-center retrospective study.

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) has a significant impact on trunk balance and quality of life in the elderly. Postoperative rod fractures pose significant challenges, but the mechanisms of their occurrence are underexplored compared to other complications such as proximal junctional kyphosis. This study investigated factors associated with rod fracture in patients with ASD. A retrospective single-center study analyzed 110 adult patients who underwent spinal deformity correction between 2012 and 2020. Comparative analysis and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were employed to identify factors associated with rod fracture. In this study, rod fracture occurred in 14.5% of patients. The rod fracture group exhibited a larger change in lumbar lordosis (LL), a higher proportion of patients with pre-operatively existing (pre-existing) vertebral fractures, and a greater percentage of patients with a rod diameter of 6mm or less compared to the non-rod fracture group. Univariate Cox regression analysis revealed that rod fracture was associated with pre-existing vertebral fracture, LL change, preoperative sagittal vertical axis, and preoperative pelvic tilt. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified pre-existing vertebral fractures and the amount of LL change as independent factors associated with rod fractures. Pre-existing vertebral fractures and the magnitude of lumbar lordosis correction are independent risk factors for rod fracture following ASD surgery. Surgeons should consider these factors during preoperative planning to reduce the risk of postoperative rod fracture. IV.

Impact of Segmental Lordosis Restoration During Degenerative Spinal Fusion on Two-Year Adjacent Segment Disease and Revision Rates.

Retrospective cohort study. Assess the impact of inadequate correction of L4-S1 lordosis during transforaminal lumber interbody fusion (TLIF) on adjacent segment disease and revision rates. Restoring alignment is an important consideration in spinal fusions. Failure to correct to level-specific alignment goals could promote the development of adjacent segment disease. As such, it is crucial to investigate the role of sagittal segmental alignment on clinical outcomes following short segment lumbar fusion. Patients who underwent 1- to 3-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and had two-year outcomes data were included in this retrospective cohort study. Segmental lumbar lordosis was assessed in all patients with L3-L4, L4-L5, and L5-S1 constructs. Demographics, radiographic spinopelvic alignment, and complications were compared in a sub-group of patients fused at L4-S1 with adequate (i.e., within 35-45°) and inadequate (i.e., <35°) L4-S1 lordosis. Among the 168 included patients, mean age was 61.7 years, 56.0% were female, and mean follow-up was 32.3 months. Segmental lumbar lordosis did not change significantly after TLIF of L3-L4, L4-L5, or L5-S1 (P>0.05). Two-year postoperatively, 32.7% developed adjacent segment disease and 19.6% underwent revisions. After stratification by adequate (N=15) or inadequate (N=54) restoration of L4-S1 lordosis following initial TLIF surgery, adequately-restored patients had higher preoperative L4-S1 lordosis (Adequately-Restored=39.3° vs Inadequately-Restored=29.5°, P<0.001) and lower two-year postoperative adjacent segment disease (6.7% vs. 33.3%, P=0.032) and revision (5.7% vs. 25.9%, P=0.l33) rates. Adjacent segment disease patients had higher implant-related complications (Adjacent Segment Disease=36.8% vs No Adjacent Segment Disease=8.0%, P=0.008) and subsequent revisions (61.1% vs. 8.7%, P<0.001). Adjacent segment disease and revisions after degenerative lumbar spinal fusion are common. In this cohort, suboptimal restoration of L4-S1 lordosis was associated with higher rates of adjacent segment disease and subsequent revisions, thus highlighting the importance of restoring sagittal alignment in degenerative spine surgery. III.

L4-L5 anatomy classification system for lateral lumbar interbody fusion.

Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), developed by Dr. Luiz Pimenta in 2006, allows access to the spinal column through the psoas major muscle. The technique has many advantages, such as reduced bone and muscular tissue damage, indirect decompression, larger implants, and lordosis correction capabilities. However, this technique also has drawbacks, with the most notorious being the risk of spinal pathologies due to indirect injury of the lumbar plexus, but with low rates of persistent injuries. Therefore, several groups have proposed classifications to help identify patients at a greater risk of presenting with neurological deficits. The present work proposes a classification system that relies on simple observation of easily identifiable key structures to guide lateral L4-L5 LLIF decision-making. Patients aged > 18 years who underwent preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between 2022 and 2023 were included until 50 high-quality images were acquired. And excluded as follow Anatomical changes in the vertebral body or major psoas muscles prevent the identification of key structures or poor-quality MRIs. Each anatomy was classified as type I, type II, or type III according to the consensus among the three observers. Fifty anatomical sites were included in this study. 70% of the L4-L5 anatomy were type I, 18% were type II, and 12% were type III. None of the type 3 L4-L5 anatomies were approached using a lateral technique. The proposed classification is an easy and simple method for evaluating the feasibility of a lateral approach to-L4-L5.

Single Position Prone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Review of the Current Literature.

Spinal fusion, vital for treating various spinal disorders, has evolved since the introduction of the minimally invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF) by Pimenta in 2001. Traditionally performed in the lateral decubitus position, LLIF faces challenges such as intraoperative repositioning, neurological complications, and lack of access to lower lumbar levels. These challenges lead to long surgery times, increased rates of perioperative complications, and increased costs. The more recently popularized prone lateral approach mitigates these issues primarily by eliminating patient repositioning, thereby enhancing surgical efficiency, and reducing operative times. This review examines the progression of spinal fusion techniques, focusing on the advantages and recent findings of the prone lateral approach compared to the traditional LLIF. The prone lateral approach has shown improved patient outcomes, including lower blood loss and shorter hospital stays, and has been validated by multiple studies for its safety and efficacy compared to the LLIF approach. Significant enhancements in postoperative metrics, such as the Oswestry Disability Index, Visual Analog Scale, and radiological improvements have been noted. Comparatively, the prone lateral approach offers superior segmental lordosis correction and potentially better subjective outcomes than the lateral decubitus position. Despite these advances, both techniques present similar risks of neurological complications. Overall, the prone lateral approach has emerged as a promising alternative in lumbar interbody fusion, combining efficiency, safety, and improved clinical outcomes.

Corner Osteotomy as the more Advanced Approach to Deformity Correction in Adult Spinal Deformity: A Retrospective Comparative Study Between Two Osteotomy Techniques.

A retrospective study. To investigate the usefulness of corner osteotomy (CO) in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) by comparing with pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) for lordosis correction. PSO remains a valuable procedure for patients with ASD, but it has a limit to obtaining correction angles exceeding 45° in patients with a large pelvic incidence or with previous spinal fusion surgeries. Theoretically, CO can exceed the limitation of PSO and can achieve a wide range of correction angles. However, no study has analyzed the clinical data and usefulness of CO. This study included 115 patients (mean age 71.1y, mean follow-up period 78.9mo) with ASD who underwent deformity correction using PSO or CO. Comparative analysis was performed on spinopelvic parameters including segmental angle (SA) around the osteotomy site, and clinical and surgical assessment between the PSO and corner groups. In the corner group, the postoperative SA (35° vs. -39.3°, P=0.004) and the degree of SA correction (34.8° vs. 39.7°, P=0.004) were greater, and a broader range of SA correction was also possible (18-51° vs. 18-61°). Although the operative time was longer in the corner group (316.8min vs. 342.3min, P=0.014), the estimated blood loss (EBL) was lower (2841.3mL vs. 2465.4mL, P=0.032). There was no difference in major complication rates, but the frequency of rod fracture (RF) was lower in the corner group (36/27 vs. 1/51, P<0.05). CO showed a greater SA correction and achieved a broader range of SA correction angles than PSO with no difference in the incidence of major complications. In addition, the EBL and the frequency of RF were lower. Based on these results, we expect that CO can serve as a promising surgical alternative to PSO for spinal deformity correction among patients with ASD.

P143. Impact of cephalad vs caudal lumbar lordosis correction on spinal shape and outcomes of complex deformity spine surgery

P143. Impact of cephalad vs caudal lumbar lordosis correction on spinal shape and outcomes of complex deformity spine surgery

Three-dimensional deformity correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients: what are the benefits of hybrid apical sublaminar bands versus all-pedicle screws?

The amount of three-dimensional (3D) correction with apical sublaminar band (hybrid-SLB) technique has not been compared to all-pedicle screw instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) using detailed axial correction metrics or comparable rod types. Our purpose is to compare 3D improvement in AIS deformities following posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion (PSIF) with hybrid-SLB and segmental correction to all-pedicle screw correction. Patients ages 10-18 years with AIS who underwent PSIF between 2015 and 2022 and had preoperative and postoperative EOS imaging were included. Electronic medical records were reviewed for demographic, Lenke classification, operative technique, and 3D EOS data. Average changes in major and minor Cobb angle, axial rotation, thoracic kyphosis, and lumbar lordosis were compared. Ninety-five patients met inclusion criteria with 55 in the hybrid-SLB group (mean age 14.9 ± 1.9 years) and 40 in all-pedicle screw (mean age 14.7 ± 2.1 years). While all-pedicle screw demonstrated greater correction of major (45.7 ± 13.4 vs 37.9 ± 14.3 degrees; P = 0.008) and minor (28.7 ± 13.1 vs 17.8 ± 12.5 degrees; P = 0.001) Cobb angles, hybrid-SLB showed greater increase in T4-T12 kyphosis (13.3 ± 15.3 vs 5.6 ± 13.5 degrees; P = 0.01). Correction of T1-T12 kyphosis, axial rotation, and lumbar lordosis was similar between groups. 3D EOS analysis of AIS patients before and after PSIF revealed that all-pedicle screw constructs had greater overall coronal plane correction and hybrid-SLB had greater thoracic sagittal plane correction. Axial corrective abilities were similar. Hybrid-SLB may have advantages for correction of thoracic lordosis or hypokyphosis. Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Sequential correction of sagittal vertical alignment and lumbar lordosis in adult flatback deformity

BackgroundFlatback deformity, or lumbar hypolordosis, can cause sagittal imbalance, causing back pain, fatigue, and functional limitation. Surgical correction through osteotomies and interbody fusion techniques can restore sagittal balance and relieve pain. This study investigated sagittal vertical alignment (SVA) and lumbar lordosis correction achieved through sequential procedures on human spine specimens. MethodsHuman T10-sacrum specimens were stratified into 2 groups: degenerative flatback specimens had smaller L1-S1 lordosis compared to the iatrogenic group (26.1°±15.0° vs. 47.8°±19.3°, p<.05). Specimens were mounted in the apparatus in simulated standing posture with a nominal sacral slope of 45 degrees and subjected to a 400N compressive follower preload. Sequential correction of degenerative lumbar flatback deformity involved: anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) at L5-S1, ALIF at L4-5, lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) at L2-3 and L3-4, and posterior column osteotomy (PCO) at L2-3 and L3-4. In iatrogenic specimens, flatback deformity was created by performing a posterior in-situ immobilization using pedicle screw instrumentation at L4-L5-S1 followed by distraction across the pedicle screws. We then performed LLIF at L2-3 and L3-4, followed by PCO at L2-3 and L3-4. ResultsStatistically significant incremental corrections were noted in SVAs and lordosis after L5-S1 ALIF, L4-5 ALIF, and PCO in degenerative flatback specimens. For the iatrogenic group, statistically significant worsening was noted in measures of standing alignment after L4-L5-S1 hypolordotic fusion. Subsequent LLIF at L2-3 and L3-4 did not significantly improve sagittal alignment. However, after PCO at L2-3 and L3-4, final alignment parameters were not significantly different than preoperative baseline values prior to hypolordotic fusion. ConclusionsALIF cages in the lower lumbar segments significantly improved sagittal alignment in degenerative flatback specimens. In the upper lumbar segments, LLIF cages alone were ineffective at enhancing lumbar lordosis. LLIF cages in conjunction with PCO improved alignment parameters in degenerative and iatrogenic flatback deformities.

Predicting Immediate Lordosis Restoration After Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and the Effect of Posterior Column Osteotomies

Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) can be combined with posterior column osteotomies (PCOs) to maximize lordotic correction. This study compares radiographic changes in regional and segmental lordosis in patients undergoing ALIF with and without PCOs. Patients >18 years old who underwent ALIF at 1 or 2 segments at a single institution (January 2014-July 2020) were included. Preoperative and postoperative radiographic parameters were determined, and a propensity-matched analysis was performed. Ninety-nine patients (53 [54%] men) underwent ALIF at 129 levels (mean [SD], 1.3 [0.46] levels; median [range] age, 61 [32-83] years). PCOs were performed in 13 (13%) patients at 19 (15%) segments. PCOs included 13 Schwab grade 1 and 6 grade 2 osteotomies. All measures, including lumbar lordosis, segmental lordosis, disc angle, and neural foramen height, increased significantly after surgery (p≤0.003). In the propensity-matched analysis, PCO was associated with greater increases in lumbar lordosis (14.9° vs. 8.2°, p=0.02), segmental lordosis (14.0° vs. 9.6°, p=0.03), and disc angle (15.0° vs. 10.2°, p=0.046). The change in disc angle more closely approximated the inherent lordosis of the cage when PCO was performed (94% vs. 62%, p=0.004). Performing PCOs and ALIFs significantly increased the radiographic correction of overall and segmental lordosis in the selected patient cohort. The disc angle achieved with ALIF without PCOs was approximately 60% of the cage lordosis. The addition of PCO allowed for greater segmental compression, enabling the disc angle to reach nearly 100% of the inherent interbody cage lordosis.

Ideal Lumbar Lordosis Correction in Patients with Adult Spinal Deformity Without Adversely Impacting Pelvic Tilt and Pelvic Incidence Minus Lumbar Lordosis: A Study of 426 Cases.

Retrospective study. To determine the ideal pelvic incidence (PI) - lumbar lordosis (LL) range to prevent pelvic tilt (PT) undercorrection while avoiding PI-LL overcorrection following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. PI-LL and PT are the important sagittal parameters to be restored to an adequate range by surgery. Ideal PI-LL target without causing PI-LL overcorrection and PT undercorrection has not been documented. We included patients with ASD undergoing ≥5-level fusion including the sacrum. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to calculate the lower limit of the ideal PI-LL without causing PI-LL overcorrection and the upper limit of ideal PI-LL without causing PT undercorrection. The calculated ideal PI-LL was validated in terms of proximal junctional kyphosis and failure (PJK and PJF) rates and clinical outcomes. Analyses were performed according to age subgroups (<70 and ≥70y). In total, 426 patients were included in the study. Female patients were predominant (85.4%), with a mean age of 69.8 years. The lower limits of PI-LL were calculated as 4.9° for all patients, 2.3° for patients aged <70 years, and 7.9° for patients aged ≥70 years. Meanwhile, the upper limits of PI-LL were calculated as 12.7° for all patients, 12.5° for patients aged <70 years, and 13.3° for patients aged ≥70 years. There were no significant differences in the PJK and PJF rates among the new three PI-LL groups. Clinical outcomes were significantly better in patients with the ideal PI-LL group than those in patients with overcorrection or undercorrection groups for all age groups. The ideal PI-LL correction target without adversely impacting PT and PI-LL was calculated at 2.3°-12.5° for patients aged <70 years and 7.9°-13.3° for patients aged ≥70 years. These guideline parameters may help ensure optimal clinical outcomes without increasing the risk of PJK/F.

Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomies for Surgical Correction of Fixed Sagittal Imbalance: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Disruption of the spine's sagittal balance is associated with significant negative impacts on quality of life. Compared with other spinal osteotomies, pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO), which can potentially offer greater correction, is considered technically challenging and performed at lower rates. The aim of this study was to review the use of PSO to correct fixed sagittal imbalance and assess its efficacy and associated perioperative complications. In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, the PubMed, EBSCO host, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar databases were queried for full-text English manuscripts published from 1961 to 2022, exploring PSO for the management of fixed sagittal imbalance. Studies were included if they reported preoperative and postoperative radiographic measurements. The mean Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies (MINORS) for included articles was 9.6 ± 1.1. The outcomes of interest included etiology, operative time, blood loss, complications, radiographic outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed using a random-effects, inverse variance-weighted meta-analysis of observational data. Pre and postoperative radiographic and clinical outcomes were compared using a Student t-test. Fourteen studies with 595 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that the mean operative time was 7.2 ± 2.0 hours, and the average blood loss was 2033 ± 629 mL. After PSO, there was a significant improvement in sagittal vertebral axis (12.41-3.92 cm, P = .0003), LL (13.35°-42.60°, P = .000002), PSO angle (5.11° to -26.91°, P = .0001), and Oswestry Disability Index (55.36-27.35, P = .02). Common complications include pseudarthrosis (8.1%), neurological deficits (7.8%), and proximal junctional failure (6.0%). PSO offers significant correction of sagittal vertebral axis, lumbar lordosis, PSO angle, and Oswestry Disability Index scores despite its reduced utilization in recent years. Blood loss and high complication rates must be considered when evaluating the efficacy of this procedure; however, surgeon experience and operative techniques can be used to reduce morbidity.

Restoring L4-S1 Lordosis Shape in Severe Sagittal Deformity: Impact of Correction Techniques on Alignment and Complication Profile

Severe sagittal plane deformity with loss of L4-S1 lordosis is disabling and can be improved through various surgical techniques. However, data is limited on the differing ability of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO), and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) to achieve alignment goals in severely malaligned patients. To examine surgical techniques aimed at restoring L4-S1 lordosis in severe adult spinal deformity (ASD). Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. A total of 96 patients who underwent ALIF, PSO, and TLIF were included in this study. The following data were observed for all cases: patient demographics, spinopelvic parameters, complications, and PROMs. Severe ASD patients with preoperative PI-LL >20°, L4-S1 lordosis <30°, and full body radiographs and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at baseline and six-week postoperative visit were included. Patients were grouped into ALIF (1-2 level ALIF at L4-S1), PSO (L4/L5 PSO), and TLIF (1-2 level TLIF at L4-S1). Comparative analyses were performed on demographics, radiographic spinopelvic parameters, complications, and PROMs. Among the 96 included patients, 40 underwent ALIF, 27 underwent PSO, and 29 underwent TLIF. At baseline, cohorts had comparable age, sex, race, Edmonton frailty scores and radiographic spinopelvic parameters (p>0.05). However, PSO was performed more often in revision cases (p<0.001). Following surgery, L4-S1 lordosis correction (p=0.001) was comparable among ALIF and PSO patients and caudal lordotic apex migration (p=0.044) was highest among ALIF patients. PSO patients had higher intraoperative estimated blood loss (p<0.001) and motor deficits (p=0.049), and in-hospital ICU admission (p=0.022) and blood products given (p=0.004) but were otherwise comparable in terms of length of stay, blood transfusion given, and postoperative admission to rehab. Likewise, 90-day postoperative complication profiles and six-week PROMs were comparable as well. ALIF can restore L4-S1 sagittal alignment as powerfully as PSO, with fewer intra-operative and in-hospital complications. When feasible, ALIF is a suitable alternative to PSO and likely superior to TLIF for correcting L4-S1 lordosis among patients with severe sagittal malalignment.

Hip Osteoarthritis in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Severe Adult Spinal Deformity: Prevalence and Impact on Spine Surgery Outcomes.

Hip osteoarthritis (OA) is common in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). Limited data exist on the prevalence of hip OA in patients with ASD, or on its impact on baseline and postoperative alignment and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Therefore, this paper will assess the prevalence and impact of hip OA on alignment and PROMs. Patients with ASD who underwent L1-pelvis or longer fusions were included. Two independent reviewers graded hip OA with the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) classification and stratified it by severity into non-severe (KL grade 1 or 2) and severe (KL grade 3 or 4). Radiographic parameters and PROMs were compared among 3 patient groups: Hip-Spine (hip KL grade 3 or 4 bilaterally), Unilateral (UL)-Hip (hip KL grade 3 or 4 unilaterally), or Spine (hip KL grade 1 or 2 bilaterally). Of 520 patients with ASD who met inclusion criteria for an OA prevalence analysis, 34% (177 of 520) had severe bilateral hip OA and unilateral or bilateral hip arthroplasty had been performed in 8.7% (45 of 520). A subset of 165 patients had all data components and were examined: 68 Hip-Spine, 32 UL-Hip, and 65 Spine. Hip-Spine patients were older (67.9 ± 9.5 years, versus 59.6 ± 10.1 years for Spine and 65.8 ± 7.5 years for UL-Hip; p < 0.001) and had a higher frailty index (4.3 ± 2.6, versus 2.7 ± 2.0 for UL-Hip and 2.9 ± 2.0 for Spine; p < 0.001). At 1 year, the groups had similar lumbar lordosis, yet the Hip-Spine patients had a worse sagittal vertebral axis (SVA) measurement (45.9 ± 45.5 mm, versus 25.1 ± 37.1 mm for UL-Hip and 19.0 ± 39.3 mm for Spine; p = 0.001). Hip-Spine patients also had worse Veterans RAND-12 Physical Component Summary scores at baseline (25.7 ± 9.3, versus 28.7 ± 9.8 for UL-Hip and 31.3 ± 10.5 for Spine; p = 0.005) and 1 year postoperatively (34.5 ± 11.4, versus 40.3 ± 10.4 for UL-Hip and 40.1 ± 10.9 for Spine; p = 0.006). This study of operatively treated ASD revealed that 1 in 3 patients had severe hip OA bilaterally. Such patients with severe bilateral hip OA had worse baseline SVA and PROMs that persisted 1 year following ASD surgery, despite correction of lordosis. Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Four-level ACDF surgical series 2000–2022: a systematic review of clinical and radiological outcomes and complications

Objective The primary objective of this investigation is to systematically scrutinize extant surgical studies delineating Four-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (4L ACDF), with a specific emphasis on elucidating reported surgical indications, clinical and radiological outcomes, fusion rates, lordosis correction, and the spectrum of complication rates. Methods The literature review was conducted in adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, employing the MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, and Scopus databases. This analysis encompasses studies implementing the 4L ACDF procedure, with detailed extraction of pertinent data pertaining to surgical methodologies, types of employed interbody cages, clinical and radiological endpoints, rates of fusion, and the incidence of complications. Results Among the 15 studies satisfying inclusion criteria, a marginal increment in the year 2022 (21.4%) was discerned, with a preponderance of study representation emanating from China (35.7%) and the United States (28.6%). 50% of the studies were single-surgeon studies. Concerning follow-up, studies exhibited variability, with 42.9% concentrating on periods of five years or less, and an equivalent proportion extending beyond this timeframe. Across the amalgamated cohort of 2457 patients, males constituted 51.6%, manifesting a mean age range of 52.2–61.3 years. Indications for surgery included radiculopathy (26.9%) and myelopathy (46.9%), with a predilection for involvement at C3–7 (24.9%). Meta-analysis yielded an overall complication rate of 16.258% (CI 95%: 14.823%–17.772%). Dysphagia (4.563%), haematoma (1.525%), hoarseness (0.205%), C5 palsy (0.176%) were the most prevalent complications of 4L ACDF. Fusion rates ranging from 41.3% to 94% were documented. Conclusion The 4L ACDF is commonly performed to address mylopathy and radiculopathy. While the surgery carries a complication rate of around 16%, its effectiveness in achieving bone fusion can vary considerably.

Improvement in Pain, Quality of Life, and Urinary Dysfunction following Correction of Lumbar Lordosis and Reduction in Lumbar Spondylolistheses Using Chiropractic BioPhysics® Structural Spinal Rehabilitation: A Case Series with >1-Year Long-Term Follow-Up Exams.

(1) Background: Lumbar spondylolisthesis affects ~20% of the US population and causes spine-related pain and disability. (2) Methods: This series reports on three patients (two females and one male) aged 68-71 years showing improvements in back pain, quality of life (QOL), and urinary dysfunction following correction of lumbar spondylolistheses using CBP® spinal rehabilitation. Pre-treatment radiographs showed lumbar hyperlordosis (-49.6°, ideal is -40°) and anterolisthesis (14.5 mm, ideal is 0 mm). Pre-treatment patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) included a numeric rating scale (NRS) for back pain (7.3/10, ideal is 0), urinary urgency (8/10, ideal is 0), and SF-36 physical (PCS) and mental component score (MCS) (29.8 and 46.6, ideal is 46.8 and 52.8). Patients underwent 2-3 CBP® sessions per week to correct lumbar hyperlordosis and lumbar anterolistheses. (3) Results: Post-treatment radiographs showed improvements in lumbar curvature (-42.8°) and anterolisthesis (4.2 mm). Post-treatment PROMs showed improvements in NRS for back pain (1/10), urinary urgency (2.3/10), and SF-36 PCS and MCS (50.2 and 57.7). Long-term follow-up radiographs and PROMs showed maintained improvements. (4) Conclusions: This series documents the first-recorded long-term corrections of lumbar spondylolisthesis and concomitant improvements in back pain, urinary urgency, and QOL using CBP®. This series provides evidence for CBP® as a non-surgical approach to lumbar spinal rehabilitation and the possible impacts of spinal alignment on pain, urinary dysfunction, and QOL.

Return to Activities of Daily Living After Fusion to the Pelvis for Adult Spinal Deformity

Study Design: Cross-sectional survey and retrospective review of prospectively-collected data. Objective: To investigate return to activities among adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients following long-segment fusion to the pelvis. Summary of Background Data: No prior studies have assessed the extent and timing of return to employment, driving, and walking among a single cohort of ASD patients. Methods: Patients who underwent thoracolumbar ASD surgery between 2016-2021 with ≥1 year follow-up were included (posterior-only, ≥3 levels of fusion to pelvis). A cross-sectional survey was implemented to evaluate preoperative and postoperative activity tolerance. Patients were categorized into (1)Better/Unchanged or (2)Worse groups based on their postoperative activity tolerance to allow for comparison of demographics and perioperative variables. Results: Ninety-five patients were included (mean age:64.3±10.1 years; body mass index (BMI):27.3±6.1 kg/m2; levels fused:8 [range 3-16]; follow-up:43.5 months). Most patients endorsed improved capacity to walk (improved:64.2%, unchanged:17.9%, worse:17.9%) and navigate stairs (improved:52.6%, unchanged:33.7%, worse:13.7%) postoperatively. Seventy-five (97.4%) patients returned to driving (4.1±10.8 months) and 44 (88.0%) patients returned to work (5.4±8.0 months). Patients with decreased walking tolerance were more likely to have greater lumbar lordosis correction (37.2±10.5° vs. 18.6±16.7°, P=0.02) and worse Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) at long-term follow-up (40.2±11.0 vs. 48.0±9.6, P=0.03). Patients with decreased ability to navigate stairs were more likely to have undergone revision fusion (69.2% vs. 28.0%, P=0.003) and have greater BMI (30.7±5.8 vs. 26.7±6.0 kg/m2, P=0.04). Patients requiring the use of a postoperative assistive walking device were more likely to have undergone revision fusion (66.7% vs. 27.5%, P=0.003), exhibit greater BMI (31.4±7.2 vs. 26.5±5.6 kg/m2, P=0.004), longer operative times (285.1±79.9 vs. 244.5±63.4 minutes, P=0.03), and worse PROMIS-PF at long-term follow-up (39.9±5.1 vs. 47.7±10.5, P=0.04). Conclusion: Despite the reduced range of motion caused by spinopelvic fusion, a majority of patients are able to successfully return to ADLs after deformity surgery.

Predicting adequate segmental lordosis correction in lumbar spinal stenosis patients undergoing oblique lumbar interbody fusion: a focus on the discontinuous segment

PurposeTo identify the factors associated with a correction of the segmental angle (SA) with a total change greater than 10° in each level following minimally invasive oblique lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-OLIF).MethodsPatients with lumbar spinal stenosis who underwent single- or two-level MIS-OLIF were reviewed. Segments with adequate correction of the SA >10° after MIS-OLIF in immediate postoperative radiograph were categorized as discontinuous segments (D segments), whereas those without such improvement were assigned as continuous segments (C segments). Clinical and radiological parameters were compared, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with SA correction >10° after MIS-OLIF.ResultsOf 211 segments included, 38 segments (18.0%) were classified as D segments. Compared with C segments, D segments demonstrated a significantly smaller preoperative SA (mean ± standard deviation [SD], − 1.1° ± 6.7° vs. 6.6° ± 6.3°, p < 0.001), larger change of SA (mean ± SD, 13.5° ± 3.4° vs. 3.1° ± 3.9°, p < 0.001), and a higher rate of presence of facet effusion (76.3% vs. 48.6%, p = 0.002). Logistic regression revealed preoperative SA (odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval (CI)]:0.733 [0.639–0.840], p < 0.001) and facet effusion (OR [95% CI]:14.054 [1.758–112.377], p = 0.027) as significant predictors for >10° SA correction after MIS-OLIF.ConclusionPreoperative kyphotic SA and facet effusion can predict SA correction >10° following MIS-OLIF. For patients with lordotic SA and no preoperative facet effusion, supplemental procedures, such as anterior column release or posterior osteotomy, should be prepared for additional lumbar lordosis correction required for remnant global sagittal imbalance after MIS-OLIF.

The Effects of Abdominal Obesity and Sagittal Imbalance on Sacroiliac Joint Pain After Lumbar Fusion

BACKGROUND: Postoperative sacroiliac joint pain (SIJP) is a common manifestation of failed back surgery syndrome after a posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). However, there is currently no consensus on the risk factors for SIJP after PLIF. OBJECTIVES: We explored the effects of abdominal obesity and sagittal imbalance on SIJP after PLIF. STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective observational cohort study. SETTING: This study occurred at the Department of Spinal Surgery at a hospital affiliated with a medical university. METHODS: A total of 401 patients who underwent PLIF from June 2018 to June 2021 were enrolled in this study. 36 patients experienced postoperative SIJP. In contrast, a matched group comprised 72 non-SIJP patients. We used 1:2 propensity score matching to compare obesity features and sagittal spine parameters in the 2 groups. Inflammatory cytokines and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were measured in the SIJP group. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients (8.98%) experienced SIJP during the follow-up. Compared with the non-SIJP group, patients with postoperative SIJP had a higher body mass index (BMI), greater abdominal obesity, a higher incidence of pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis greater than 10°, and a higher incidence of a sagittal vertical axis greater than 5 cm (P &lt; 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the area under the curve for waist circumference was greater than that for BMI (0.762 vs. 0.650, P = 0.049). Logistic regression analysis revealed that the risk factors for SIJP were abdominal obesity, a pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis of greater than 10°, and a sagittal vertical axis greater than 5 cm (P &lt; 0.05). In patients with SIJP, interleukin 6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and VAS scores were higher in the abdominal obesity group than in the non-abdominal obesity group (P &lt; 0.05). LIMITATIONS: There was no uniform diagnosis of SIJP, so the incidence rate of SIJP might not be accurate. CONCLUSIONS: The significant predictors of SIJP were abdominal obesity and sagittal imbalance. Patients with abdominal obesity showed higher levels of inflammatory markers and pain intensity. More attention should be paid to body shape and the angle of correction of lumbar lordosis before lumbar surgery. KEY WORDS: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion, sacroiliac joint pain, abdominal obesity, sagittal imbalance, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis, sagittal vertical axis, inflammatory cytokines, visual analog scale

Risk factors of instrumentation failure after laminectomy and posterior cervical fusions (PCF)

BackgroundFor patients with multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy, laminectomy and posterior cervical fusions (PCF) with instrumentation are widely accepted techniques for symptom relief. However, hardware failure is not rare and results in neck pain or even permanent neurological lesions. There are no in-depth studies of hardware-related complications following laminectomy and PCF with instrumentation.MethodsThe present study was a retrospective, single centre, observational study. Patients who underwent laminectomy and PCF with instrumentation in a single institution between January 2019 and January 2021 were included. Patients were divided into hardware failure and no hardware failure group according to whether there was a hardware failure. Data, including sex, age, screw density, end vertebra (C7 or T1), cervical sagittal alignment parameters (C2-C7 cervical lordosis, C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis, T1 slope, Cervical lordosis correction), regional Hounsfield units (HU) of the screw trajectory and osteoporosis status, were collected and compared between the two groups.ResultsWe analysed the clinical data of 56 patients in total. The mean overall follow-up duration was 20.6 months (range, 12–30 months). Patients were divided into the hardware failure group (n = 14) and no hardware failure group (n = 42). There were no significant differences in the general information (age, sex, follow-up period) of patients between the two groups. The differences in fusion rate, fixation levels, and screw density between the two groups were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The failure rate of fixation ending at T1 was lower than that at C7 (9% vs. 36.3%) (p = 0.019). The regional HU values of the pedicle screw (PS) and lateral mass screw (LMS) in the failure group were lower than those in the no failure group (PS: 267 ± 45 vs. 368 ± 43, p = 0.001; LMS: 308 ± 53 vs. 412 ± 41, p = 0.001). The sagittal alignment parameters did not show significant differences between the two groups before surgery or at the final follow-up (p > 0.05). The hardware failure rate in patients without osteoporosis was lower than that in patients with osteoporosis (14.3% vs. 57.1%) (p = 0.001).ConclusionsOsteoporosis, fixation ending at C7, and low regional HU value of the screw trajectory were the independent risk factors of hardware failure after laminectomy and PCF. Future studies should illuminate if preventive measures targeting these factors can help reduce hardware failure and identified more risk factors, and perform long-term follow-up.