Lopinavir Trough Concentrations Research Articles

Leveraging physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling to optimize dosing for lopinavir/ritonavir with rifampin in pediatric patients.

Treatment of HIV and tuberculosis co-infection leads to significant mortality in pediatric patients, and treatment can be challenging due to the clinically significant drug-drug interaction (DDI) between lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/RTV) and rifampin. Doubling LPV/RTV results in insufficient lopinavir trough concentrations in pediatric patients. The objective of this study was to leverage physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling to optimize the adjusted doses of LPV/RTV in children receiving the WHO-revised doses of rifampin (15 mg/kg daily). Adult and pediatric PBPK models for LPV/RTV with rifampin were developed, including CYP3A and P-glycoprotein inhibition and induction. Data for LPV/RTV model development and evaluation were available from the pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group. Dosing simulations were next performed to optimize dosing in children (2 months to 8 years of age). Exposure following super-boosted LPV/RTV with 10 and 15 mg/kg PO daily rifampin was simulated. Simulated parameters were within twofold observations for LPV, RTV, and rifampin in adults and children ≥2 weeks old. The model predicted that, in healthy adults receiving 400/100 mg oral LPV/RTV twice daily (BID), co-treatment with 600 mg oral rifampin daily decreased the steady-state area under the concentration vs. time curve of LPV by 79%, in line with the observed change of 75%. Simulated and observed concentration profiles were comparable for LPV/RTV (230/57.5 mg/m2 ) PO BID without rifampin and 230/230 mg/m2 LPV/RTV PO BID with 10 mg/kg PO daily rifampin in pediatric patients. Sixteen mg/kg of super-boosted LPV (LPV/RTV 1:1) PO BID with 15 mg/kg PO daily rifampin achieved simulated LPV troughs >1 mg/L in ≥93% of virtual children weighing 3.0-24.9 kg, which was comparable with 10 mg/kg PO daily rifampin. Super-boosted LPV/RTV with 15 mg/kg rifampin achieves therapeutic LPV troughs in HIV/TB-infected simulated children.

Development of In Situ Self-Assembly Nanoparticles to Encapsulate Lopinavir and Ritonavir for Long-Acting Subcutaneous Injection.

Most antiretroviral medications for human immunodeficiency virus treatment and prevention require high levels of patient adherence, such that medications need to be administered daily without missing doses. Here, a long-acting subcutaneous injection of lopinavir (LPV) in combination with ritonavir (RTV) using in situ self-assembly nanoparticles (ISNPs) was developed to potentially overcome adherence barriers. The ISNP approach can improve the pharmacokinetic profiles of the drugs. The ISNPs were characterized in terms of particle size, drug entrapment efficiency, drug loading, in vitro release study, and in vivo pharmacokinetic study. LPV/RTV ISNPs were 167.8 nm in size, with a polydispersity index of less than 0.35. The entrapment efficiency was over 98% for both LPV and RTV, with drug loadings of 25% LPV and 6.3% RTV. A slow release rate of LPV was observed at about 20% on day 5, followed by a sustained release beyond 14 days. RTV released faster than LPV in the first 5 days and slower than LPV thereafter. LPV trough concentration remained above 160 ng/mL and RTV trough concentration was above 50 ng/mL after 6 days with one subcutaneous injection. Overall, the ISNP-based LPV/RTV injection showed sustained release profiles in both in vitro and in vivo studies.

Pharmacokinetics of antiretroviral and tuberculosis drugs in children with HIV/TB co-infection: a systematic review.

IntroductionManagement of concomitant use of ART and TB drugs is difficult because of the many drug–drug interactions (DDIs) between the medications. This systematic review provides an overview of the current state of knowledge about the pharmacokinetics (PK) of ART and TB treatment in children with HIV/TB co-infection, and identifies knowledge gaps.MethodsWe searched Embase and PubMed, and systematically searched abstract books of relevant conferences, following PRISMA guidelines. Studies not reporting PK parameters, investigating medicines that are not available any longer or not including children with HIV/TB co-infection were excluded. All studies were assessed for quality.ResultsIn total, 47 studies met the inclusion criteria. No dose adjustments are necessary for efavirenz during concomitant first-line TB treatment use, but intersubject PK variability was high, especially in children <3 years of age. Super-boosted lopinavir/ritonavir (ratio 1:1) resulted in adequate lopinavir trough concentrations during rifampicin co-administration. Double-dosed raltegravir can be given with rifampicin in children >4 weeks old as well as twice-daily dolutegravir (instead of once daily) in children older than 6 years. Exposure to some TB drugs (ethambutol and rifampicin) was reduced in the setting of HIV infection, regardless of ART use. Only limited PK data of second-line TB drugs with ART in children who are HIV infected have been published.ConclusionsWhereas integrase inhibitors seem favourable in older children, there are limited options for ART in young children (<3 years) receiving rifampicin-based TB therapy. The PK of TB drugs in HIV-infected children warrants further research.

Evaluation of super-boosted lopinavir/ritonavir in combination with rifampicin in HIV-1-infected patients with tuberculosis

Rifampicin induces the metabolism of many drugs. To overcome the reduction in serum concentrations of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) when used in combination with rifampicin, 800/200 mg or 400/400 mg doses are used. This study evaluated super-boosted LPV/r (400/400 mg) in HIV/TB co-infected patients for adequate concentrations as well as short-term safety, tolerability and clinical response to therapy. This was an open-label, non-randomised pharmacokinetic (PK) study in HIV/TB patients. The primary objective was to determine the PK profile of super-boosted LPV/r when given with a rifampicin-based TB regimen. Secondary objectives were short-term safety, tolerability and clinical response. Primary endpoints were a lopinavir trough concentration (Cmin) >1.0 µg/mL and a rifampicin maximum concentration (Cmax) of 8-24 µg/mL. Secondary PK endpoints were a rifampicin area under the concentration-time curve from 0-24 h (AUC0-24) of 44-70 µg·h/mL, a lopinavir Cmax of 6-14 µg/mL and a lopinavir AUC0-12 of 56-130 µg·h/mL. Eleven patients (10 male, age 25-43 years) were enrolled. Two patients were discontinued due to non-compliance. A lopinavir Cmin of >1.0 µg/mL was achieved in a least one of the PK samplings in all nine subjects who completed treatment. All patients met lopinavir Cmax and AUC0-12 targets. Five patients achieved the primary endpoint of rifampicin Cmax (≥8 µg/mL) in at least one of the PK samplings, and five achieved the minimum rifampicin AUC0-24 (≥44 µg·h/mL). One grade 3 adverse event was reported. Super-boosted LPV/r was safe and effective in HIV/TB patients. [ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT01700790.].

Lopinavir–ritonavir super-boosting in young HIV-infected children on rifampicin-based tuberculosis therapy compared with lopinavir–ritonavir without rifampicin: a pharmacokinetic modelling and clinical study

Rifampicin reduces lopinavir concentrations in HIV and tuberculosis co-treated patients. We hypothesised that adding ritonavir to co-formulated lopinavir-ritonavir (4:1) to achieve a one-to-one ratio would overcome this drug-drug interaction in young children. We did a prospective, open-label, one-group, one-sequence study at five sites in three South African provinces. We included HIV-infected children with tuberculosis, a bodyweight of 3-15 kg, and a post-conceptional age of more than 42 weeks. Children received the standard four-to-one ratio of lopinavir-ritonavir in the absence of rifampicin-based anti-tuberculosis treatment, whereas super-boosting of lopinavir-ritonavir with additional ritonavir was given orally twice a day to achieve a one-to-one ratio during rifampicin treatment. The primary outcome was the comparison of the proportion of children with predicted lopinavir morning minimum concentrations (Cmin) of more than 1·0 mg/L during super-boosting with the proportion of more than 1·0 mg/L during standard lopinavir-ritonavir treatment without rifampicin. Lopinavir concentrations were determined before and at 1, 2, 4, 6, and 10 h after the morning dose during the second and the last month of tuberculosis co-treatment, and 4-6 weeks after stopping rifampicin. A non-linear mixed-effects model was implemented to interpret the data and Monte Carlo simulations were used to compare the percentage of lopinavir with morning Cmin values of less than 1·0 mg/L for the two dosing schemes. A non-inferiority margin of 10% was used. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02348177. Between Jan 30, 2013, and Nov 9, 2015, 96 children with a median age of 18·2 months (IQR 9·6-26·8) were enrolled. Of these 96 children, 80 (83%) completed the first three pharmacokinetic evaluations. Tuberculosis therapy was started before antiretrovirals in 70 (73%) children. The model-predicted percentage of morning Cmin of less than 1·0 mg/L after tuberculosis treatment without super-boosting was 8·8% (95% CI 0·6-19·8) versus 7·6% (0·4-16·2) during super-boosting and tuberculosis treatment. The difference of -1·1% (95% CI -6·9 to 3·2), at a non-inferiority margin of 10%, confirmed the non-inferiority of lopinavir trough concentrations during rifampicin co-treatment. 19 serious adverse events were reported in 12 participants. Three deaths and a temporary treatment interruption due to jaundice were unrelated to study treatment. Lopinavir exposure with ritonavir super-boosting in a one-to-one ratio during rifampicin-based tuberculosis treatment was non-inferior to the exposure with lopinavir-ritonavir without rifampicin. Safe and effective, field application of super-boosting is limited by poor acceptability. Access to better adapted solid formulations will most likely facilitate public health implementation of this strategy. DNDi, French Development Agency, UBS Optimus Foundation, and Unitaid.

Pharmacokinetics and Drug-Drug Interactions of Lopinavir-Ritonavir Administered with First- and Second-Line Antituberculosis Drugs in HIV-Infected Children Treated for Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis.

Lopinavir-ritonavir forms the backbone of current first-line antiretroviral regimens in young HIV-infected children. As multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis (TB) frequently occurs in young children in high-burden TB settings, it is important to identify potential interactions between MDR-TB treatment and lopinavir-ritonavir. We describe the pharmacokinetics of and potential drug-drug interactions between lopinavir-ritonavir and drugs routinely used for MDR-TB treatment in HIV-infected children. A combined population pharmacokinetic model was developed to jointly describe the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir and ritonavir in 32 HIV-infected children (16 with MDR-TB receiving treatment with combinations of high-dose isoniazid, pyrazinamide, ethambutol, ethionamide, terizidone, a fluoroquinolone, and amikacin and 16 without TB) who were established on a lopinavir-ritonavir-containing antiretroviral regimen. One-compartment models with first-order absorption and elimination for both lopinavir and ritonavir were combined into an integrated model. The dynamic inhibitory effect of the ritonavir concentration on lopinavir clearance was described using a maximum inhibition model. Even after adjustment for the effect of body weight with allometric scaling, a large variability in lopinavir and ritonavir exposure, together with strong correlations between the pharmacokinetic parameters of lopinavir and ritonavir, was detected. MDR-TB treatment did not have a significant effect on the bioavailability, clearance, or absorption rate constants of lopinavir or ritonavir. Most children (81% of children with MDR-TB, 88% of controls) achieved therapeutic lopinavir trough concentrations (>1 mg/liter). The coadministration of lopinavir-ritonavir with drugs routinely used for the treatment of MDR-TB was found to have no significant effect on the key pharmacokinetic parameters of lopinavir or ritonavir. These findings should be considered in the context of the large interpatient variability found in the present study and the study's modest sample size.

Are Prophylactic and Therapeutic Target Concentrations Different?: the Case of Lopinavir-Ritonavir or Lamivudine Administered to Infants for Prevention of Mother-to-Child HIV-1 Transmission during Breastfeeding.

The ANRS 12174 trial assessed the efficacy and tolerance of lopinavir (LPV)-ritonavir (LPV/r) prophylaxis versus those of lamivudine (3TC) prophylaxis administered to breastfed infants whose HIV-infected mothers were not on antiretroviral therapy. In this substudy, we assessed LPV/r and 3TC pharmacokinetics to evaluate the percentage of infants with therapeutic plasma concentrations and to discuss these data in the context of a prophylactic treatment. Infants from the South African trial site underwent blood sampling for pharmacokinetic study at weeks 6, 26, and 38 of life. We applied a Bayesian approach to derive the 3TC and LPV pharmacokinetic parameters on the basis of previously published pharmacokinetic models for HIV-infected children. We analyzed 114 LPV and 180 3TC plasma concentrations from 69 infants and 92 infants, respectively. A total of 30 LPV and 20 3TC observations were considered missing doses and discarded from the Bayesian analysis. The overall population analysis showed that 30 to 40% of the infants did not reach therapeutic targets, regardless of treatment group. The median LPV trough concentrations at weeks 6, 26, and 38 were 2.8 mg/liter (interquartile range [IQR], 1.7 to 4.4 mg/liter), 5.6 mg/liter (IQR, 3.2 to 7.7 mg/liter), and 3.4 mg/liter (IQR, 2.3 to 7.3 mg/liter), respectively. The median 3TC area under the curve from 0 to 12 h after the last drug intake were 5.6 mg · h/liter (IQR, 4.1 to 7.8 mg · h/liter), 5.9 mg · h/liter (IQR, 5.1 to 7.5 mg · h/liter), and 7.3 mg · h/liter (IQR, 4.9 to 8.5 mg · h/liter) at weeks 6, 26, and 38, respectively. Use of the therapeutic doses recommended by the WHO would have resulted in a higher proportion of infants achieving the targets. However, no HIV-1 infection was reported among these infants. These results suggest that the prophylactic targets for both 3TC and LPV may be lower than the therapeutic ones. For treatment, the WHO dosing guidelines should be suitable to maintain values above the therapeutic pharmacokinetic targets in most infants. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT00640263.).

Antiretroviral Treatment Efficacy and Safety in Older HIV-Infected Adults.

Highly active antiretroviral therapy (ART) and its widespread availability have revolutionized the landscape of HIV care and patient outcomes, transforming infection with HIV into a manageable chronic condition rather than a life-limiting disease. This transformation has created an older patient demographic. The effect that older age has on the outcomes of ART is not completely understood. Limited data are available in older individuals due to underrepresentation in clinical trials. To better understand this relationship, we conducted a literature search to assess the impact of older age on the outcomes of ART in the older HIV-infected population, including immunologic and virologic outcomes, mortality, disease progression, toxicity of ART, and pharmacokinetic considerations. In addition, package inserts of antiretroviral (ARV) medications were reviewed for efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetic information pertaining to the older population. Most studies in older adults (50yrs or older) demonstrated slower and blunted CD4 immune recovery but better virologic suppression in response to ART. Higher rates of mortality and faster disease progression have been observed in adults 50 years and older, particularly during the first year after ART initiation. HIV-infected patients aged50years and older appear to be at greater risk for certain ART-associated toxicities including nephrotoxicity, decline in bone mineral density and bone fracture, symptomatic peripheral neuropathy, and cardiovascular disease including myocardial infarction. The available literature suggests that clinicians should consider avoiding agents such as tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in older patients with risk factors for renal impairment and/or osteoporosis. If TDF is used in patients aged50years or older, more frequent monitoring should be considered. Older age was a significant predictor for higher atazanavir exposure and higher lopinavir trough concentration at 24weeks. The clinical implications of these findings are unknown. It is imperative that future development of novel ARV drug therapies includes a greater proportion of older subjects in clinical trials.

Impact of body weight and missed doses on lopinavir concentrations with standard and increased lopinavir/ritonavir doses during late pregnancy

To assess the influence of body weight and missed doses on lopinavir pharmacokinetics with standard and increased doses of lopinavir/ritonavir melt extrusion tablets during late pregnancy. Lopinavir concentration data during the third trimester of pregnancy were pooled from clinical trials in Thailand (NCT00409591) and the USA (NCT00042289). A total of 154 HIV-infected pregnant women receiving either 400/100 mg (standard) or 600/150 mg (increased) twice daily had lopinavir plasma concentration data available. Population parameters were estimated using non-linear mixed-effects regression models. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to estimate the probability of achieving target lopinavir trough concentrations (>1.0 mg/L) with standard and increased doses of lopinavir/ritonavir during pregnancy. The median (range) age, weight and gestational age were 28 years (18-43), 62 kg (45-123) and 33 weeks (29-38), respectively. Body weight influenced lopinavir oral clearance (CL/F) and volume of distribution (V/F). Population estimates of lopinavir CL/F and V/F were 6.21 L/h/70 kg and 52.6 L/70 kg, respectively. Based on simulations, the highest risk of subtherapeutic trough concentrations was for women weighing >100 kg using the standard dose (∼ 7%), while the risk was <2% with the 600/150 mg dose for women weighing 40-130 kg. After a missed dose, 61% of women have lopinavir concentrations below target prior to the next dose with the standard dose compared with 42% with the increased dose. Standard dosing provides adequate lopinavir trough concentrations for the majority of pregnant women but increased doses may be preferable for women weighing >100 kg and with a history of lopinavir/ritonavir use and/or adherence issues.

CYP3A4*22 (c.522-191 C>T; rs35599367) is associated with lopinavir pharmacokinetics in HIV-positive adults.

The CYP3A4*22 (c.522-191 C>T; rs35599367) single nucleotide polymorphism has been associated with lower CYP3A4 mRNA expression and activity. We investigated the association of CYP3A4*22 with the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir through a population pharmacokinetic approach. The minor allele frequency for CYP3A4*22 was 0.035, and seven of 375 patients had a combination of CYP3A4*22 and SLCO1B1 521T>C alleles. Lack of information on the ethnicity in this cohort should be considered as a limitation. However, in the final model, the population clearance was 5.9 l/h and patients with CYP3A4*22/*22 had 53% (P=0.023) lower clearance compared with noncarriers. In addition, the combined effect of CYP3A4*22 with SLCO1B1 521T>C (previously shown to be associated with lopinavir plasma concentration) was analysed. We observed a 2.3-fold higher lopinavir trough concentration (Ctrough) in individuals with CYP3A4*22/*22, a 1.8-fold higher Ctrough with SLCO1B1 521CC and a 9.7-fold higher Ctrough in individuals homozygous for both single nucleotide polymorphisms, compared with noncarriers. A simulated dose-reduction scenario showed that 200/100 mg lopinavir/ritonavir was adequate to achieve therapeutic concentration in individuals with CYP3A4*22/*22 alone or in combination with SLCO1B1 521CC. These data further our understanding of the genetic basis for variability in the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir.

Lopinavir Plasma Concentrations and Virological Outcome with Lopinavir-Ritonavir Monotherapy in HIV-1-Infected Patients

There is significant intra- and intersubject variability in lopinavir (LPV) plasma concentrations after standard dosing; thus, this prospective study was conducted to determine whether low plasma LPV concentrations could be associated with virological outcome throughout lopinavir-ritonavir maintenance monotherapy (mtLPVr) in the clinical practice setting. If this hypothesis would be confirmed, LPV drug monitoring could improve the efficacy of mtLPVr regimens. Patients with previous virological failure (VF) on protease inhibitor-based regimens were also included if the genotypic resistance tests showed no major resistance mutation associated with reduced susceptibility to lopinavir-ritonavir. VF was defined as 2 consecutive determinations of HIV RNA levels of >200 copies/ml. Efficacy was analyzed by per-protocol analysis. Plasma LPV trough concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography using a UV detector. A total of 127 patients were included (22% with previous failure on protease inhibitors). After 96 weeks, the efficacy rate was 82.3% (95% confidence interval [CI(95)], 75.3 to 89.3%). Virological efficacy was independent of LPV plasma concentrations even when LPVr was given once daily. An adherence of <90% (HR, 4.4 [CI(95), 1.78 to 10.8; P = 0.001]) and the presence of blips in the preceding 12 months (HR, 3.06 [CI(95), 1.17 to 8.01; P = 0.022]) were the only variables independently associated with time to VF. These findings suggest that the LPV concentrations achieved with the standard doses of LPVr are sufficient to maintain virological control during monotherapy and that measurement of LPV concentrations is not useful for predicting virological outcome. Tight control of viral replication in the previous months and strict adherence throughout the mtLPVr regimen could improve the virological efficacy of this maintenance regimen.

Discordant Associations Between SLCO1B1 521T→C and Plasma Levels of Ritonavir-boosted Protease Inhibitors in AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study A5146

Among HIV-positive patients prescribed ritonavir-boosted lopinavir, SLCO1B1 521T→C (rs4149056) is associated with increased plasma lopinavir exposure. Protease inhibitors (PIs) are also substrates for cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A and ABCB1, which are induced by NR1I2. We characterized relationships between ABCB1, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, NR1I2, and SLCO1B1 polymorphisms and trough PI concentrations among AIDS Clinical Trials Group study A5146 participants. At study entry, subjects with virologic failure on PI-containing regimens initiated new ritonavir-boosted PI regimens. We studied associations between week 2 PI plasma trough concentrations and 143 polymorphisms in these genes, including 4 targeted polymorphisms. Among 275 subjects with both drug concentrations and genetic data, allelic frequencies of SLCO1B1 521T→C were 15%, 1%, and 8% in whites, blacks, and Hispanics, respectively. Further analyses were limited to 268 white, black, or Hispanic subjects who initiated ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (n = 98), fosamprenavir (n = 69), or saquinavir (n = 99). Of targeted polymorphisms, SLCO1B1 521T→C tended to be associated with higher lopinavir concentrations, with a 1.38-fold increase in the mean per C allele (95% confidence interval, 0.97-1.96; n = 98; P = 0.07). With fosamprenavir, SLCO1B1 521T→C was associated with lower amprenavir concentrations, with a 35% decrease in the mean per C allele (geometric mean ratio 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.94; n = 69; adjusted P = 0.02). There was no significant association with saquinavir concentrations, and none of the remaining 139 exploratory polymorphisms were statistically significant after correcting for multiple comparisons. With ritonavir-boosted PIs, a SLCO1B1 polymorphism that predicts higher lopinavir trough concentrations seems to predict lower amprenavir trough concentrations. The mechanism underlying this discordant association is uncertain.

Lopinavir Plasma Concentrations and Serum Lipids in Therapy Na&amp;#239;ve HIV-Patients: A Sub Analysis of the FREE Study

Antiretroviral therapy in HIV patients is known for its negative effect on the cardiovascular system. One of the major adverse events in patients on lopinavir is increasing lipids. Hyperlipidaemia together with chronic inflammation by HIV-infection itself makes these patients prone for cardiovascular diseases.The purpose of this study (a sub study within the FREE-study) was to determine if higher plasma lopinavir (LPV) concentrations lead to increase of serum lipids. Plasma drug concentrations were analysed up to week 24 in a prospective cohort of HIV antiretroviral therapy naive patients who started on a regimen of zidovudine, lamivudine and ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (FREE study). Prospectively we measured plasma lopinavir concentrations from baseline to week 24 in 72 naive HIV-patients starting on lopinavir (59 males and 13 females). A total of 210 samples were analysed, with at least 2 samples in every patient. Mean LPV trough concentration was 4.3 mg/L (± 2.1). The median intra-subject variation in LPV level was 38% (range 4% - 111%). Serum lipids were not correlated to LPV plasma concentrations possibly due to the wide intra-individual variability in LPV trough levels. Monitoring of plasma lopinavir and subsequent dose adjustment of LPV will not be useful to prevent hyperlipidaemia in HIV-patients treated with lopinavir.

Age-Related Changes in Plasma Concentrations of the HIV Protease Inhibitor Lopinavir

The advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy in the treatment of HIV disease has substantially extended the lifespan of individuals infected with HIV resulting in a growing population of older HIV-infected individuals. The efficacy and safety of antiretroviral agents in the population are important concerns. There have been relatively few studies assessing antiretroviral pharmacokinetics in older patients. Thirty-seven subjects aged 18-30 years and 40 subjects aged 45-79 years, naive to antiretroviral therapy, received lopinavir/ritonavir (400/100) bid, emtricitibine 200 mg qd, and stavudine 40 mg bid. Trough lopinavir concentrations were available for 44 subjects, collected at 24, 36, and 96 weeks. At week 24, older age was associated with higher lopinavir trough concentrations, and a trend was observed toward older age being associated with higher lopinavir trough concentrations when all time points were evaluated. In the young cohort, among subjects with two or more measurements, there was a trend toward increasing intrasubject trough lopinavir concentrations over time. Using a nonlinear, mixed-effects population pharmacokinetic model, age was negatively associated with lopinavir clearance after adjusting for adherence. Adherence was assessed by patient self-reports; older patients missed fewer doses than younger patients (p = 0.02). No difference in grade 3-4 toxicities was observed between the two age group. Older patients have higher trough lopinavir concentrations and likely decreased lopinavir clearance. Age-related changes in the pharmacokinetics of antiretroviral drugs may be of increasing importance as the HIV-infected population ages and as older individuals comprise an increasing proportion of new diagnoses.

Pharmacokinetics and 48 week efficacy of low-dose lopinavir/ritonavir in HIV-infected children--authors' response

Sir, We thank Neely and Rakhmanina for their helpful comments on our article. We agree that these are pilot data on the use of low-dose lopinavir/ritonavir in children that need larger efficacy trials before implementation in practice and also emphasize that the clinical implication of this study is limited to HIV-infected children who are naive to protease inhibitors (PIs). However, we strongly believe that the concept of lower dosing of lopinavir/ritonavir is a valid research agenda especially for low and middle income countries. By the end of 2008, UNAIDS reported that 730000 children were in need of antiretroviral therapy. Only 275500 children, or 38%, had access to lifesaving medications, showing that cost issues still have a significant impact on public health programmes. According to WHO guidelines, the recommended first-line regimen is a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based regimen; PI-based regimens are used for second-line therapy. However, based on reports from Asia and Africa, – 5 16%–26% of children experienced treatment failure and subsequently needed to switch to a second-line regimen, so the demand for a PI drug regimen is in the range of 50000–100000 children. The 70% dose reduction simply means that for every three children, one child is treated for free. The report from the Liverpool therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) registry with data from 439 HIV-infected adults in Europe showed that .50% of patients had a lopinavir trough level .5000 ng/mL. The Kaledose trial also showed that reducing the dose of lopinavir/ritonavir from 400/100 to 266/66 mg among HIV-infected adult patients who were stable on the lopinavir/ritonavir regimen and had a high lopinavir trough level (defined as .5000 ng/mL) had no effect on treatment efficacy but significantly reduced the triglyceride level at 48 weeks. These studies support the need for optimization of lopinavir dosage not only for resource-limited settings but also globally in both adults and children. The heat-stable lopinavir/ritonavir tablet formulation, comprising either 100/25 or 200/50 mg lopinavir/ritonavir, has less pharmacokinetic variability compared with a soft gel or oral solution. The lopinavir TDM data derived from 54 Thai children showed a median lopinavir trough concentration of 6700 ng/mL, with 96% of children having lopinavir levels .4000 ng/L. A pharmacokinetic study of a low-dose lopinavir/ritonavir tablet formulation among Thai children is underway. The study plans to enrol 24 children with body weight .25 kg. Children weighing between 25 and 35 kg will be the subject of two pharmacokinetic studies comparing standard dosing using three tablets of 100/25 mg lopinavir/ritonavir and low dosing using two tablets. Children weighing .35 kg will be evaluated in a pharmacokinetic study comparing four versus three tablets.

Drug-Drug Interaction Between Itraconazole and the Protease Inhibitor Lopinavir/Ritonavir

To report the results of therapeutic drug monitoring of lopinavir/ritonavir and itraconazole concentrations in an HIV-infected male who was treated for histoplasmosis. A 34-year-old HIV-infected man who had recently initiated efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy was diagnosed with disseminated Histoplasma capsulatum infection. In the hospital, lopinavir/ritonavir 400 mg/100 mg twice daily replaced efavirenz to avoid efavirenz-itraconazole interactions. After 14 days of liposomal amphotericin B therapy, itraconazole solution was initiated at 150 mg twice daily for 3 days, followed by 200 mg daily. Prior to itraconazole initiation, lopinavir trough concentration was 7.4 mg/L. The lopinavir trough concentration 15 days later, after 14 days of itraconazole, was 6.8 mg/L. An itraconazole concentration measured 2 hours post-dose on day 15 of oral therapy was 1.9 microg/mL. After 2 weeks of liposomal amphotericin, urine Histoplasma antigen was 27.23 ng/mL; after 5 months of oral itraconazole therapy, it decreased to 5.24 ng/mL. Plasma HIV RNA decreased 4.26 log(10) in 5 months to less than 40 copies/mL. The patient has demonstrated marked clinical improvement. In this case, dosing recommendations of itraconazole 200 mg daily with lopinavir/ritonavir were appropriate. Lopinavir trough concentrations were not significantly different following the addition of itraconazole and were above the minimum target of 1 mg/L in treatment-naïve patients. The itraconazole concentration was above the recommended concentration of at least 1 microg/mL. The dose of itraconazole was reduced to 200 mg daily as recommended by current guidelines, and therapeutic drug monitoring of both itraconazole and lopinavir concentrations confirmed that no further dosage adjustments were necessary.

Assessing the Impact of Substance use and Hepatitis Coinfection on Atazanavir and Lopinavir Trough Concentrations in HIV-Infected Patients During Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

Atazanavir (ATV) and lopinavir (LPV) are widely used HIV-1 protease inhibitors. Like with other protease inhibitors, careful monitoring of potential drug-drug and drug-disease interactions in clinical practice is necessary. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of substance use and hepatitis virus coinfection on plasma ATV and LPV trough concentrations in HIV-positive substance users and nonusers. Individuals established on ATV (300 mg and 100 mg ritonavir daily) or LPV (400 mg and 100 mg ritonavir twice daily)-containing regimens completed two clinical visits (trough and directly observed therapy) during which dosing characteristics, concomitant medication, and substance use were recorded. Trough plasma concentrations (22-26 hours for ATV and 10-14 hours for LPV) were measured using LCMSMS. The influence of substance use was evaluated by Kruskal-Wallis test. Substance use was associated with a marked decrease in trough LPV concentrations during the trough visit (median, 5.536 and 3.791 microg/mL for nonsubstance users and substance users, respectively, P = 0.029). Significantly lower LPV trough levels were also noted among patients with active hepatitis C virus coinfection evaluated as an independent variable (median, 2.253 and 5.927 microg/mL for active and inactive/no hepatitis C virus infection, respectively, P = 0.032). Substance use and hepatitis virus coinfection had limited effects on ATV trough levels. In this cohort, despite the wide interindividual variability of ATV and LPV trough concentrations, significant associations between substance use and active hepatitis C virus infection and low LPV trough concentrations were observed. Further work is needed to assess the optimal dosing regimen when using LPV in HIV-infected substance users.

Multidrug Resistance 1 Polymorphisms and Trough Concentrations of Atazanavir and Lopinavir in Patients with HIV

HIV-infected patients receiving protease inhibitors may benefit from therapeutic drug monitoring-assisted dose adjustment to achieve target plasma concentrations. However, efflux pumps such as permeability-glycoprotein, which is encoded by the multidrug resistance (MDR)1 gene, may decrease intracellular drug concentrations, thus reducing the amount of drug at the site of action. Plasma concentrations of protease inhibitors and CD4 cell count response have been associated with the T allele at the MDR1 C3435T locus. We examined MDR1 single nucleotide polymorphisms in a cohort of patients in whom therapeutic drug monitoring is ongoing through a research protocol. In a multicenter study, genotypic analyses at two MDR1 loci, C3435T and G2677T, were performed by a real-time polymerase chain reaction method using DNA from 103 patients categorized as substance users or nonusers on atazanavir or lopinavir as the primary antiretrovirals. Allelic frequencies were determined as a function of racial/ethnic background, substance use status and trough concentrations of atazanavir and lopinavir. The C/T and G/T alleles at the MDR1 C3435T and G2677T loci were equally frequent in the Caucasian population, but the wild-type alleles were more prevalent in the African-American population (59% homozygous [CC] and 32% heterozygous [CT] for C3435T; 80% homozygous [GG] and 16% heterozygous [GT] for G2677T). The frequencies in the Hispanic population were 46% CC and 38% CT for C3435T, and 58% GG and 38% GT for G2677T. No significant differences were seen in allele frequencies for MDR1 polymorphisms in substance user versus nonuser groups. Trough plasma concentrations of atazanavir or lopinavir were not correlated with the variant T allele. These data confirm the higher prevalence of wild-type alleles of the MDR1 gene in African-Americans and the linkage disequilibrium between C3435T and G2677T loci. The T allele at the MDR1 C3435T and G2677T loci was not associated with higher atazanavir or lopinavir trough concentrations.

A Computer-Based System to aid in the Interpretation of Plasma Concentrations of Antiretrovirals for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

To develop a computer-based system for modelling and interpreting plasma antiretroviral concentrations for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Data were extracted from a prospective TDM study of 199 HIV-infected patients (CCTG 578). Lopinavir (LPV) and efavirenz (EFV) pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were modelled using a Bayesian method and interpreted by an expert committee of HIV specialists and pharmacologists who made TDM recommendations. These PK models and recommendations formed the knowledge base to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) system that could estimate drug exposure, interpret PK data and generate TDM recommendations. The modelled PK exposures and expert committee TDM recommendations were considered optimum and used to validate results obtained by the AI system. A group of patients, 67 on LPV, 46 on EFV and three on both drugs, were included in this analysis. Correlations were high for LPV and EFV estimated trough and 4 h post-dose concentrations between the Al estimates and modelled values (r > 0.79 for all comparisons; P < 0.0001). Although trough concentrations were similar, significant differences were seen for mean predicted 4 h concentrations for EFV (4.16 microg/ml versus 3.89 microg/ml; P = 0.02) and LPV (7.99 microg/ml versus 8.79 microg/ml; P < 0.001). The AI and expert committee TDM recommendations agreed in 53 out of 69 LPV cases [kappa (kappa) = 0.53; P < 0.001] and 47 out of 49 EFV cases (kappa = 0.91; P < 0.001). The AI system successfully estimated LPV and EFV trough concentrations and achieved good agreement with expert committee TDM recommendations for EFV- and LPV-treated patients.

Lopinavir Plasma Levels in Salvage Regimes by a Population of Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy-Treated HIV-1–Positive Patients

Increased lopinavir (LPV) exposure obtained in vivo through combination with low-dose ritonavir may overcome a certain grade of resistance but not all. We sought to analyze LPV variability and possible risk factors. LPV trough plasma concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography after 1, 4, and 12 weeks from salvage regimens and tested in both univariate and multivariate regression analyses with age, gender, weight, risk factors for HIV acquisition, hepatitis C virus reactivity, hepatitis B surface antigen positivity, baseline aspartate transferase (AST) or alanine transferase (ALT) levels, creatinine, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) or tenofovir as concomitant drugs, and NNRTIs administered in the previous regimen. Fifty-six patients were included into the study. Among them, 8 of 56 (14.3%) at week 1, 12 of 56 (21.4%) at week 4, and 9 of 56 (16.1%) at week 12 had suboptimal LPV plasma concentrations, defined as trough concentration less than 4 microg/mL. No correlation was found between LPV trough concentrations and assessed variables. In conclusion, pharmacokinetic variability and low LPV concentrations have been found, supporting the use of therapeutic drug monitoring in those starting this drug.