Lopinavir Concentrations Research Articles

Comparative study of two MIP-based electrochemical sensors for selective detection and quantification of the antiretroviral drug lopinavir in human serum

Thermal polymerization (TP) and electropolymerization (EP) are the two methods used in this study to explore the molecular imprinting process. To detect the antiviral medication lopinavir (LPV), an inhibitor of enzyme HIV-1 protease that is co-formulated with ritonavir (RTV) to extend its half-life in the body, with greater precision, these methods were merged with an electrochemical sensor. The sensors were created on glassy carbon electrodes (GCE) based on molecularly imprinted polymers (MIP) using TP with methacrylic acid (MAA) functional monomer and EP with p-aminobenzoic acid (PABA) functional monomer. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and electrochemical methods were utilized to examine the technical features of the suggested sensors. For both approaches, the necessary optimization investigations were carried out. Different LPV concentrations, ranging from 1.0 pM to 17.5 pM in drug solution and commercial human serum samples, were used to validate the analytical efficiency of the two sensors and compare their electroanalytical behaviour. For TP-LPV@MIP/GCE and EP-LPV@MIP/GCE, the corresponding limit of detection (LOD) was 2.68 × 10−13 M (0.169 pg mL−1) and 1.79 × 10−13 M (0.113 pg mL−1) in standard solutions, and 2.87 × 10−13 M (0.180 pg mL−1) and 2.91 × 10−13 M (0.183 pg mL−1) in serum samples. For the measurement of LPV in tablet form and serum samples, the proposed TP-LPV@MIP/GCE and EP-LPV@MIP/GCE sensors provide good recovery, demonstrating 99.85–101.16 % and 100.36–100.97 % recovery, respectively. The imprinting factor was utilized to demonstrate the selectivity of the suggested sensors by utilizing several anti-viral drugs that are structurally comparable to LPV. Additionally, the constructed sensors were examined for the potential impacts of interferences and the stability during the storage.

Drug monitoring of antiretroviral drugs in children with perinatal HIV infection

Therapeutic drug monitoring is the practice of measuring the concentration of a drug in patient’s biological fluids to assess the effectiveness and safety of drug therapy. The results of determining the drug level in biological fluids can also indicate noncompliance of therapy regimen and low adherence to therapy.The aim. To compare the concentrations of some antiretroviral drugs (lopinavir, ritonavir, lamivudine, abacavir, zidovudine) in children living with HIV infection of different age groups.Methods. We examined 184 children with perinatal HIV infection who underwent therapeutic drug monitoring of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (lamivudine, abacavir, zidovudine) and protease inhibitors (lopinavir, ritonavir). Children were divided into four age groups. Group 1 included children 1–2 years old (n = 7); group 2 – children 3–5 years old (n = 14); group 3 – children 6–11 years old (n = 78); group 4 – children 12–17 years old (n = 85). The concentration of antiretroviral drugs in blood plasma was determined using high-performance liquid chromatography with mass selective detection.Results. The lowest lopinavir concentration was found in children 12–17 years old (3782 [2117–5046] ng/ml), which was statistically significantly different from the similar values in children 6–11 years old (5614 [3521–7264] ng/ml; p = 0.011). For other antiretroviral drugs, no statistically significant differences in blood plasma concentrations were found in children of different age groups.Conclusion. The lowest lopinavir concentrations are detected in children older than 11 years. For the other studied antiretroviral drugs, this pattern was not revealed

Population Pharmacokinetics of Pediatric Lopinavir/Ritonavir Oral Pellets in Children Living with HIV in Africa.

Antiretroviral therapy for children living with HIV (CLHIV) under 3 years of age commonly includes lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r). However, the original liquid LPV/r formulation has taste and cold storage difficulties. To address these challenges, LPV/r oral pellets have been developed. These pellets can be mixed with milk or food for administration and do not require refrigeration. We developed the population pharmacokinetic (PK) model and assessed drug exposure of LPV/r oral pellets administered twice daily to CLHIV per World Health Organization (WHO) weight bands. The PK analysis included Kenyan and Ugandan children participating in the LIVING studies (NCT02346487) receiving LPV/r pellets (40/10 mg) and ABC/3TC (60/30 mg) dispersible tablets. Population PK models were developed for lopinavir (LPV) and ritonavir (RTV) to evaluate the impact of RTV on the oral clearance (CL/F) of LPV. The data obtained from the study were analyzed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach. Data from 514 children, comprising a total of 2,998 plasma concentrations of LPV/r were included in the analysis. The LPV and RTV concentrations were accurately represented by a one-compartment model with first-order absorption (incorporating a lag-time) and elimination. Body weight influenced LPV and RTV PK parameters. The impact of RTV concentrations on the CL/F of LPV was characterized using a maximum effect model. Simulation-predicted target LPV exposures were achieved in children with this pellet formulation across the WHO weight bands. The LPV/r pellets dosed in accordance with WHO weight bands provide adequate LPV exposures in Kenyan and Ugandan children weighing 3.0 to 24.9 kg.

Inadequate Lopinavir Concentrations With Modified 8-Hourly Lopinavir/Ritonavir 4:1 Dosing During Rifampicin-based Tuberculosis Treatment in Children Living With HIV.

Lopinavir/ritonavir plasma concentrations are profoundly reduced when co-administered with rifampicin. Super-boosting of lopinavir/ritonavir is limited by nonavailability of single-entity ritonavir, while double-dosing of co-formulated lopinavir/ritonavir given twice-daily produces suboptimal lopinavir concentrations in young children. We evaluated whether increased daily dosing with modified 8-hourly lopinavir/ritonavir 4:1 would maintain therapeutic plasma concentrations of lopinavir in children living with HIV receiving rifampicin-based antituberculosis treatment. Children with HIV/tuberculosis coinfection weighing 3.0 to 19.9 kg, on rifampicin-based antituberculosis treatment were commenced or switched to 8-hourly liquid lopinavir/ritonavir 4:1 with increased daily dosing using weight-band dosing approach. A standard twice-daily dosing of lopinavir/ritonavir was resumed 2 weeks after completing antituberculosis treatment. Plasma sampling was conducted during and 4 weeks after completing antituberculosis treatment. Of 20 children enrolled; 15, 1-7 years old, had pharmacokinetics sampling available for analysis. Lopinavir concentrations (median [range]) on 8-hourly lopinavir/ritonavir co-administered with rifampicin (n = 15; area under the curve 0-24 55.32 mg/h/L [0.30-398.7 mg/h/L]; C max 3.04 mg/L [0.03-18.6 mg/L]; C 8hr 0.90 mg/L [0.01-13.7 mg/L]) were lower than on standard dosing without rifampicin (n = 12; area under the curve 24 121.63 mg/h/L [2.56-487.3 mg/h/L]; C max 9.45 mg/L [0.39-26.4 mg/L]; C 12hr 3.03 mg/L [0.01-17.7 mg/L]). During and after rifampicin cotreatment, only 7 of 15 (44.7%) and 8 of 12 (66.7%) children, respectively, achieved targeted pre-dose lopinavir concentrations ≥1mg/L. Modified 8-hourly dosing of lopinavir/ritonavir failed to achieve adequate lopinavir concentrations with concurrent antituberculosis treatment. The subtherapeutic lopinavir exposures on standard dosing after antituberculosis treatment are of concern and requires further evaluation.

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Bioequivalence of 2 Lopinavir/Ritonavir (200/50mg) Tablets in Healthy Chinese Volunteers: Effect of Food on Absorption.

Lopinavir/ritonavir is an important protease inhibitor for treating HIV-1 infection in patients aged >2 years in combination with other antiretrovirals. The antiviral activity of lopinavir/ritonavir in vivo is mainly derived from lopinavir, while ritonavir improves the bioavailability of lopinavir. This study compared the bioequivalence and safety of 2 lopinavir/ritonavir (200/50mg) formulations under fasted and fed conditions in healthy Chinese volunteers and compared the pharmacokinetic parameters of lopinavir and ritonavir. A randomized, open-label, single-dose, 4-period, crossover bioequivalence was conducted in 72 subjects under fasted and fed conditions. Lopinavir and ritonavir plasma concentrations were analyzed using validated liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Noncompartmental analysis was used to evaluate pharmacokinetic parameters. The 90% confidence intervals of test/reference geometric mean ratio for lopinavir and ritonavir area under the plasma concentration-time curve and maximum drug concentration meets the bioequivalence criteria based on the average bioequivalence method. A high-fat meal delayed the time to the maximum concentration of lopinavir and ritonavir. Therefore, these formulations were bioequivalent in healthy Chinese volunteers under fasting and fed conditions. Moreover, adverse events were more frequent in the fed state, but all were mild.

Virological failure of antiretroviral therapy and associated social and clinical factors in children and adolescents living with HIV

According to the World Health Organization, sustained virological suppression of 90 % should be achieved among children and adolescents living with HIV / AIDS, which makes it important to assess the prevalence of virological failure of antiretroviral therapy. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of virological failure and the clinical factors associated with it, as well as therapeutic drug monitoring in groups divided by the viral load level among children and adolescents with HIV. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of the medical records of 184 children and adolescents receiving antiretroviral therapy and registered at the Irkutsk Regional Center for the Prevention and Control of AIDS and Infectious Diseases, Irkutsk, was carried out. The study included 172 children aged 1-18 years with perinatal HIV infection. Patients were divided into groups depending on the level of viral load: group 1 – 21 patients with viral load > 1000 copies/ml of plasma, group 2 – 42 patients with viral load 50– 1000 copies/ml of plasma, group 3 – 109 patients with undetectable viral load (< 50 copies/ml). All patients underwent standard tests in accordance with clinical guidelines for the treatment of HIV infection in children, as well as therapeutic drug monitoring. Results. Against the background of ongoing antiretroviral therapy, a significant number of patients 21 / 172 (12,2 %) experienced virological failure. The proportion of children and adolescents with incomplete suppression of HIV replication is 42 / 172 (24,4 %). Statistically significant differences were obtained by changing the ART regimen (p = 0,031). In the first group, the proportion of patients who changed the therapy regimen is 7 / 21 (33,3 %), which is two times less than in the group with a zero viral load of 70 / 109 (64,2 %). There are differences in the proportion of children and adolescents with zero concentrations of ritonavir and lopinavir (p = 0,020 and p = 0,012) in the three compared groups. The distribution of patients with zero concentrations was as follows: for ritonavir in the first group 3 / 17 (17,6 %), in the second – 8/37 (21,6 %), in the third group – 4/80 (5 %); for lopinavir – 4/17 (23,5 %), 6/36 (16,7 %), 3/80 (3,8 %), respectively. Conclusion. This study demonstrates that the prevalence of virological failure among children and adolescents receiving ART remains high. To achieve sustained virological suppression in children and adolescents taking a protease inhibitor regimen, adherence to therapy must be increased. As one of the methods for assessing adherence, therapeutic drug monitoring can be used.

Some pharmacogenetic aspects of the <i>ABCB1</i> gene in lopinavir / ritonavir concentration variability in children with HIV infection: A pilot study

Polymorphic variants of the multidrug resistance gene (ABCB1 or MDR1) are associated with changes in the absorption and transport of drugs in the body. One of the substrates of the ABCB1 transporter is an antiretroviral drug from the class of protease inhibitors, lopinavir. The aim. To research the effect of polymorphic variants C1236T and C3435T in the ABCB1 gene on the plasma concentration of lopinavir / ritonavir in children and adolescents living with HIV infection. Methods. The genotypes of polymorphic variants of the ABCB1 gene were identified in 136 HIV infected children and adolescents; median age – 10 [7–12] years. The plasma concentration of lopinavir / ritonavir was measured from blood taken during the next scheduled appointment as part of dispensary observation at the Irkutsk Regional AIDS Centre using high performance liquid chromatography. Results. The average duration of lopinavir/ritonavir use as part of an antiretroviral therapy was 55 months. Median viral load in patients was 1 [1–2.03] log 10 copies/ mL; the number of CD4 + T cells – 38.36 %. The frequency of occurrence of the 3435T and 1236T alleles of the ABCB1 gene was ~50 %. In carriers of the 3435TT genotype, the median lopinavir concentrations 2 and 12 hours after drug intake were 5050.8 [3615.8–5847.7] and 2665.5 [216–4896.3] ng/mL, respectively. In carriers of the 1236TT genotype, median lopinavir concentrations 2 and 12 hours after drug intake were 4913.5 [3355.1–5733.7] and 3290.6 [159.1–4972.5] ng/mL, respectively. Conclusions. The study did not reveal a significant relationship between the carriage of the C3435T and C1236T genotypes of the ABCB1 gene and the concentrations of lopinavir and ritonavir 2 and 12 hours after drug intake.

Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on the aquatic environment associated with disinfection byproducts and pharmaceuticals

In this study, concentrations of disinfection byproducts (DBPs) and COVID-19 related pharmaceuticals in wastewater effluents and surface water were measured two weeks, three months and eight months after the lockdown in Wuhan. Little temporal variation in DBP concentrations suggested intensified disinfection during the COVID-19 pandemic had limited impacts on the occurrence of DBPs in the aquatic environment. In contrast, the pandemic led to a significant increase in concentrations of lopinavir and ritonavir in wastewater effluents and surface water. The high detection frequency of these pharmaceuticals in surface water after the lockdown highlighted their mobility and persistence in the aquatic environment. The initial ecological risk assessment indicated moderate risks associated with these pharmaceuticals in surface water. As the global situation is still rapidly evolving with a continuous surge in the number of confirmed COVID-19 cases, our results suggest a pressing need for monitoring COVID-19 related pharmaceuticals as well as a systematic evaluation of their ecotoxicities in the aquatic environment.

Seasonal Variation of Antiretroviral Drug Exposure during the Year: The Experience of 10 Years of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.

Although studies show an annual trend for immunosuppressive drugs, particularly during different seasons, no data are available for antiretroviral drugs exposures in different periods of the year. For this reason, the aim of this study was to investigate an association between seasonality and antiretroviral drugs plasma concentrations. Antiretroviral drugs exposures were measured with liquid chromatography validated methods. A total of 4148 human samples were analysed. Lopinavir, etravirine and maraviroc levels showed seasonal fluctuation. In detail, maraviroc and etravirine concentrations decreased further in summer than in winter. In contrast, lopinavir concentrations had an opposite trend, increasing more in summer than in winter. The etravirine efficacy cut-off value of 300 ng/mL seems to be affected by seasonality: 77.1% and 22.9% of samples achieved this therapeutic target, respectively, in winter and summer, whereas 30% in winter and 70% in summer did not reach this value. Finally, age over 50 years and summer remained in the final multivariate regression model as predictors of the etravirine efficacy cut-off. This study highlights the seasonal variation in antiretroviral drugs plasma concentrations during the year, leading to a better understanding of inter-individual variability in drug exposures. Studies are required in order to confirm these data, clarifying which aspects may be involved.

An open-label randomized controlled trial of the effect of lopinavir/ritonavir, lopinavir/ritonavir plus IFN-β-1a and hydroxychloroquine in hospitalized patients with COVID-19

ObjectivesWe evaluated the clinical, virological and safety outcomes of lopinavir/ritonavir, lopinavir/ritonavir–interferon (IFN)-β-1a, hydroxychloroquine or remdesivir in comparison to standard of care (control) in coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) inpatients requiring oxygen and/or ventilatory support. MethodsWe conducted a phase III multicentre, open-label, randomized 1:1:1:1:1, adaptive, controlled trial (DisCoVeRy), an add-on to the Solidarity trial (NCT04315948, EudraCT2020-000936-23). The primary outcome was the clinical status at day 15, measured by the WHO seven-point ordinal scale. Secondary outcomes included quantification of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in respiratory specimens and pharmacokinetic and safety analyses. We report the results for the lopinavir/ritonavir-containing arms and for the hydroxychloroquine arm, trials of which were stopped prematurely. ResultsThe intention-to-treat population included 583 participants—lopinavir/ritonavir (n = 145), lopinavir/ritonavir–IFN–β-1a (n = 145), hydroxychloroquine (n = 145), control (n = 148)—among whom 418 (71.7%) were male, the median age was 63 years (IQR 54–71), and 211 (36.2%) had a severe disease. The day-15 clinical status was not improved with the investigational treatments: lopinavir/ritonavir versus control, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.83, (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55–1.26, p 0.39), lopinavir/ritonavir–IFN–β-1a versus control, aOR 0.69 (95%CI 0.45–1.04, p 0.08), and hydroxychloroquine versus control, aOR 0.93 (95%CI 0.62–1.41, p 0.75). No significant effect of investigational treatment was observed on SARS-CoV-2 clearance. Trough plasma concentrations of lopinavir and ritonavir were higher than those expected, while those of hydroxychloroquine were those expected with the dosing regimen. The occurrence of serious adverse events was significantly higher in participants allocated to the lopinavir/ritonavir-containing arms. ConclusionIn adults hospitalized for COVID-19, lopinavir/ritonavir, lopinavir/ritonavir–IFN–β-1a and hydroxychloroquine improved neither the clinical status at day 15 nor SARS-CoV-2 clearance in respiratory tract specimens.

Inhibition of CYP3A7 DHEA-S Oxidation by Lopinavir and Ritonavir: An Alternative Mechanism for Adrenal Impairment in HIV Antiretroviral-Treated Neonates

Prophylactic antiretroviral therapy (ART) in HIV infected pregnant mothers and their newborns can dramatically reduce mother-to-child viral transmission and seroconversion in the neonate. The ritonavir-boosted lopinavir regimen, known as Kaletra, has been associated with premature birth and transient adrenal insufficiency in newborns, accompanied by increases in plasma dehydroepiandrosterone 3-sulfate (DHEA-S). In the fetus and neonates, cytochrome P450 CYP3A7 is responsible for the metabolism of DHEA-S into 16α-hydroxy DHEA-S, which plays a critical role in growth and development. In order to determine if CYP3A7 inhibition could lead to the adverse outcomes associated with Kaletra therapy, we conducted in vitro metabolic studies to determine the extent and mechanism of CYP3A7 inhibition by both ritonavir and lopinavir and the relative intrinsic clearance of lopinavir with and without ritonavir in both neonatal and adult human liver microsomes (HLMs). We identified ritonavir as a potent inhibitor of CYP3A7 oxidation of DHEA-S (IC50 = 0.0514 μM), while lopinavir is a much weaker inhibitor (IC50 = 5.88 μM). Furthermore, ritonavir is a time-dependent inhibitor of CYP3A7 with a KI of 0.392 μM and a kinact of 0.119 min–1, illustrating the potential for CYP3A mediated drug–drug interactions with Kaletra. The clearance rate of lopinavir in neonatal HLMs was much slower and comparable to the rate observed in adult HLMs in the presence of ritonavir, suggesting that the addition of ritonavir in the cocktail therapy may not be necessary to maintain effective concentrations of lopinavir in neonates. Our results suggest that several of the observed adverse outcomes of Kaletra therapy may be due to the direct inhibition of CYP3A7 by ritonavir and that the necessity for the inclusion of this drug in the therapy may be obviated by the lower rate of lopinavir clearance in the neonatal liver. These results may lead to a reconsideration of the use of ritonavir in neonatal antiretroviral therapy.

Neglecting Plasma Protein Binding in COVID-19 Patients Leads to a Wrong Interpretation of Lopinavir Overexposure.

Boffito et al. recalled the critical importance to correctly interpret protein binding. Changes of lopinavir pharmacokinetics in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) are a perfect illustration. Indeed, several studies described that total lopinavir plasma concentrations were considerably higher in patients with severe COVID‐19 than those reported in patients with HIV. These findings have led to a reduction of the dose of lopinavir in some patients, hypothesizing an inhibitory effect of inflammation on lopinavir metabolism. Unfortunately, changes in plasma protein binding were never investigated. We performed a retrospective cohort study. Data were collected from the medical records of patients hospitalized for COVID‐19 treated with lopinavir/ritonavir in intensive care units or infectious disease departments of Toulouse University Hospital (France). Total and unbound concentrations of lopinavir, C reactive protein, albumin, and alpha‐1‐acid glycoprotein (AAG) levels were measured during routine care on the same samples. In patients with COVID‐19, increased total lopinavir concentration is the result of an increased AAG‐bound lopinavir concentration, whereas the unbound concentration remains constant, and insufficient to reduce the severe acute respiratory syndrome‐coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) viral load. Although international guidelines have recently recommended against using lopinavir/ritonavir to treat severe COVID‐19, the description of lopinavir pharmacokinetics changes in COVID‐19 is a textbook case of the high risk of misinterpretation of a total drug exposure when changes in protein binding are not taken into consideration.

Plasma Concentrations and Safety of Lopinavir/Ritonavir in COVID-19 Patients.

Background:Although the efficacy of lopinavir/ritonavir has not been proven, it has been proposed as an off-label treatment for COVID-19. Previously, it has been reported that the plasma concentrations of lopinavir significantly increase in inflammatory settings. As COVID-19 may be associated with major inflammation, assessing the plasma concentrations and safety of lopinavir in COVID-19 patients is essential.Methods:Real-world COVID-19 data based on a retrospective study.Results:Among the 31 COVID-19 patients treated with lopinavir/ritonavir between March 18, 2020 and April 1, 2020, higher lopinavir plasma concentrations were observed, which increased by 4.6-fold (interquartile range: 3.6–6.2), compared with the average plasma concentrations in HIV. Lopinavir concentrations in all except one patient were above the upper limit of the concentration range of HIV treatment. Approximately one to 5 patients prematurely stopped treatment mainly because of an ADR related to hepatic or gastrointestinal disorders.Conclusions:Lopinavir plasma concentrations in patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 were higher than expected, and they were associated with the occurrence of hepatic or gastrointestinal adverse drug reactions. However, a high plasma concentration may be required for in vivo antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2, as suggested by previous studies. Therefore, in the absence of adverse drug reaction, lopinavir dosage should not be reduced. Caution is essential because off-label use can be associated with a new drug safety profile.

3D-printing of lopinavir printlets by selective laser sintering and quantification of crystalline fraction by XRPD-chemometric models

The objectives of this study were to develop and characterize amorphous lopinavir (LPV) printlets and to the quantify crystalline fraction of LPV in the printlets by X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD)-chemometric models. Amorphous printlets (4.5 mm diameter × 3 mm height) of various LPV concentrations were fabricated by selective laser sintering (SLS) 3D technique. The printlets were characterized for physicochemical properties. The XRPD data in conjunction with chemometric method were used to quantify the crystalline fraction of the drug. The LPV content in the printlets was 95.2–100.9%, disintegration time was < 2 min, and dissolution was fast (>90% of LPV was dissolved in < 30 min). The porosity of the printlets increased with an increase in the LPV percentage. The differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and XRPD data of the printlets demonstrated that the majority of LPV was present in amorphous form. The XRPD-chemometric models showed good linearity and low root mean squared error, standard error, and bias. Models validation showed that the actual values of crystalline and amorphous fractions of the drug were close to the predicted values. These results demonstrated the feasibility of fabricating amorphous printlets by SLS method, and the application of the XRPD-chemometric models to quantify low fractions of crystalline drug in the 3D formulations if they are formed due to process or environment related variables.

Targeted delivery of lopinavir to HIV reservoirs in the mesenteric lymphatic system by lipophilic ester prodrug approach

The combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) can efficiently suppress HIV replication, but the cessation of cART usually results in viral rebound, mostly due to the presence of viral reservoirs. The mesenteric lymphatic system, including mesenteric lymph nodes (MLNs), is an important viral reservoir into which antiretroviral drugs poorly penetrate. In this work, we proposed a novel lipophilic ester prodrug approach, combined with oral lipid-based formulation, to efficiently deliver lopinavir (LPV) to the mesenteric lymph and MLNs. A series of prodrugs was designed using an in-silico model for prediction of affinity to chylomicrons (CMs), and then synthesized. The potential for mesenteric lymphatic targeting and bioconversion to LPV in physiologically relevant media was assessed in vitro and ex vivo. Subsequently, LPV and selected prodrug candidates were evaluated for their in vivo pharmacokinetics and biodistribution in rats. Oral co-administration of lipids alone could not facilitate the delivery of unmodified LPV to the mesenteric lymphatic system and resulted in undetectable levels of LPV in these tissues. However, a combination of the lipophilic prodrug approach with lipid-based formulation resulted in efficient targeting of LPV to HIV reservoirs in mesenteric lymph and MLNs. The maximum levels of LPV in mesenteric lymph were 1.6- and 16.9-fold higher than protein binding-adjusted IC90 (PA-IC90) of LPV for HIV-1 (140 ng/mL) following oral administration of simple alkyl ester prodrug and activated ester prodrug, respectively. Moreover, the concentrations of LPV in MLNs were 1.1- and 7.2-fold higher than PA-IC90 following administration of simple alkyl ester prodrug and activated ester prodrug, respectively. Furthermore, the bioavailability of LPV was also substantially increased following oral administration of activated ester prodrug compared to unmodified LPV. This approach, especially if can be translated to other antiretroviral drugs, has potential for reducing the size of HIV reservoirs within the mesenteric lymphatic system.

Population pharmacokinetics of lopinavir/ritonavir in Covid-19 patients.

ObjectiveTo develop a population pharmacokinetic model for lopinavir boosted by ritonavir in coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) patients.MethodsConcentrations of lopinavir/ritonavir were assayed by an accredited LC-MS/MS method. The population pharmacokinetics of lopinavir was described using non-linear mixed-effects modeling (NONMEM version 7.4). After determination of the base model that better described the data set, the influence of covariates (age, body weight, height, body mass index (BMI), gender, creatinine, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), C reactive protein (CRP), and trough ritonavir concentrations) was tested on the model.ResultsFrom 13 hospitalized patients (4 females, 9 males, age = 64 ± 16 years), 70 lopinavir/ritonavir plasma concentrations were available for analysis. The data were best described by a one-compartment model with a first-order input (KA). Among the covariates tested on the PK parameters, only the ritonavir trough concentrations had a significant effect on CL/F and improved the fit. Model-based simulations with the final parameter estimates under a regimen lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100 mg b.i.d. showed a high variability with median concentration between 20 and 30 mg/L (Cmin/Cmax) and the 90% prediction intervals within the range 1–100 mg/L.ConclusionAccording to the estimated 50% effective concentration of lopinavir against SARS-CoV-2 virus in Vero E6 cells (16.7 mg/L), our model showed that at steady state, a dose of 400 mg b.i.d. led to 40% of patients below the minimum effective concentration while a dose of 1200 mg b.i.d. will reduce this proportion to 22%.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s00228-020-03020-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Effect of Systemic Inflammatory Response to SARS-CoV-2 on Lopinavir and Hydroxychloroquine Plasma Concentrations.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) leads to inflammatory cytokine release, which can downregulate the expression of metabolizing enzymes. This cascade affects drug concentrations in the plasma. We investigated the association between lopinavir (LPV) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) plasma concentrations and the levels of the acute-phase inflammation marker C-reactive protein (CRP). LPV plasma concentrations in 92 patients hospitalized at our institution were prospectively collected. Lopinavir-ritonavir was administered every 12 hours, 800/200 mg on day 1 and 400/100 mg on day 2 until day 5 or 7. HCQ was given at 800 mg, followed by 400 mg after 6, 24, and 48 h. Hematological, liver, kidney, and inflammation laboratory values were analyzed on the day of drug level determination. The median age of study participants was 59 (range, 24 to 85) years, and 71% were male. The median durations from symptom onset to hospitalization and treatment initiation were 7 days (interquartile range [IQR], 4 to 10) and 8 days (IQR, 5 to 10), respectively. The median LPV trough concentration on day 3 of treatment was 26.5 μg/ml (IQR, 18.9 to 31.5). LPV plasma concentrations positively correlated with CRP values (r = 0.37, P < 0.001) and were significantly lower when tocilizumab was preadministered. No correlation was found between HCQ concentrations and CRP values. High LPV plasma concentrations were observed in COVID-19 patients. The ratio of calculated unbound drug fraction to published SARS-CoV-2 50% effective concentrations (EC50) indicated insufficient LPV concentrations in the lung. CRP values significantly correlated with LPV but not HCQ plasma concentrations, implying inhibition of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) metabolism by inflammation.

Abnormal laboratory findings and plasma concentration monitoring of lopinavir and ritonavir in COVID-19.

It is not known whether the adverse events (AEs) associated with the administration of lopinavir and ritonavir (LPV/r) in the treatment of COVID-19 are concentration-dependent. In a retrospective study of 65 patients treated with LPV/r and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for severe forms of COVID-19 (median age: 67; males: 41 [63.1%]), 33 (50.8%) displayed a grade ≥2 increase in plasma levels of hepatobiliary markers, lipase and/or triglycerides. A causal relationship between LPV/r and the AE was suspected in 9 of the 65 patients (13.8%). At 400 mg b.i.d., the plasma trough concentrations of LPV/r were high and showed marked interindividual variability (median [interquartile range]: 16,600 [11,430-20,842] ng/ml for lopinavir and 501 [247-891] ng/ml for ritonavir). The trough lopinavir concentration was negatively correlated with body mass index, while the trough ritonavir concentration was positively correlated with age and negatively correlated with prothrombin activity. However, the occurrence of abnormal laboratory values was not associated with higher trough plasma concentrations of LPV/r. Further studies will be needed to determine the value of TDM in LPV/r-treated patients with COVID-19.

Pharmacokinetics of lopinavir/ritonavir oral solution to treat COVID-19 in mechanically ventilated ICU patients.

BackgroundThe combination lopinavir/ritonavir is recommended to treat HIV-infected patients at the dose regimen of 400/100 mg q12h, oral route. The usual lopinavir trough plasma concentrations are 3000–8000 ng/mL. A trend towards a 28 day mortality reduction was observed in COVID-19-infected patients treated with lopinavir/ritonavir.ObjectivesTo assess the plasma concentrations of lopinavir and ritonavir in patients with severe COVID-19 infection and receiving lopinavir/ritonavir.Patients and methodsMechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 infection included in the French COVID-19 cohort and treated with lopinavir/ritonavir were included. Lopinavir/ritonavir combination was administered using the usual adult HIV dose regimen (400/100 mg q12h, oral solution through a nasogastric tube). A half-dose reduction to 400/100 mg q24h was proposed if lopinavir Ctrough was >8000 ng/mL, the upper limit considered as toxic and reported in HIV-infected patients. Lopinavir and ritonavir pharmacokinetic parameters were determined after an intensive pharmacokinetic analysis. Biological markers of inflammation and liver/kidney function were monitored.ResultsPlasma concentrations of lopinavir and ritonavir were first assessed in eight patients treated with lopinavir/ritonavir. Median (IQR) lopinavir Ctrough reached 27 908 ng/mL (15 928–32 627). After the dose reduction to 400/100 mg q24h, lopinavir/ritonavir pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed in nine patients. Lopinavir Ctrough decreased to 22 974 ng/mL (21 394–32 735).ConclusionsIn mechanically ventilated patients with severe COVID-19 infections, the oral administration of lopinavir/ritonavir elicited plasma exposure of lopinavir more than 6-fold the upper usual expected range. However, it remains difficult to safely recommend its dose reduction without compromising the benefit of the antiviral strategy, and careful pharmacokinetic and toxicity monitoring are needed.

Assessment of lamivudine, zidovudine, lopinavir, and ritonavir plasma levels in HIV-positive pregnant women: Drug monitoring application to improve patient safety.

Simultaneous therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) is critical during pregnancy in order to improve clinical follow-up, monitor viral load, and patient adherence to treatment.A modified simple and fast ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry and electrospray ionization (UPLC-ESI-MS/MS) method was developed and validated according to national and international guidelines for the simultaneous determination of lamivudine (LMV), zidovudine (ZDV), lopinavir (LPV), and ritonavir (RTV) concentrations in 100-μL plasma sample of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-positive pregnant women. Protein precipitation using 0.1% formic acid in cold acetonitrile was used for sample preparation. The chromatographic separation was achieved with a run-time of 3.0 minutes and 3-μL injection on an ethylene bridged hybrid C18 column (2.1 μm × 50 mm, 1.7 μm), under gradient conditions using acetonitrile and formic acid (0.1%).The chromatographic method was used to analyze 10 plasma samples from 8 HIV pregnant women as a clinical patient routinely follow-up by applying TDM criteria.The protonated precursor/product ion transitions for LMV (230.18/112.08), ZDV (268.22/127.10), LPV (629.55/447.35), and RTV (721.50/296.20) were recorded in multiple-reaction-monitoring (MRM) mode. The calibration curve was linear in the range of 50-3,000, 75-4,500, 250-15,000, and 25-1,500-ng/mL for LMV, ZDV, LPV, and RTV, respectively. The range of accuracy was 97.2% to 100.1% and precision 3.4% to 12.7%. The method showed specificity and matrix effect values of < 15%. Minimum absolute recovery percentages (%CV) were 90.5 (5.4), 90.8 (5.0), 95.4 (3.5), and 93.7 (6.9), for LMV, ZDV, LPV, and RTV, respectively. Drug concentrations in patient samples had high inter-individual variability with %CV of 91.98%, 77.54%, 53.80%, and 92.16% for ZDV, LMV, LPV, and RTV, respectively. Two of the 8 patients showed no adherence due to the absence of Protease Inhibitors (PIs) levels in plasma.This technique demonstrated to be effective in therapeutic drug monitoring and is intended to be used in population pharmacokinetics specifically for HIV-positive pregnant women.