Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Biopsy Research Articles

Endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ-from Papanicolaou test to hysterectomy: a series of 74 cases.

Endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) is not always identified on cervical Papanicolaou (Pap) test cytology because the Pap test has relatively low sensitivity for the diagnosis endocervical glandular lesions. We performed a retrospective study to determine the relative sensitivity of different diagnostic approaches, including Pap tests, cervical biopsy and/or endocervical curettage, loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP), and hysterectomy specimens. Cases of endocervical AIS diagnosed from August 2005 to January 2019 were retrieved from our institution's pathology databases, and their clinicopathologic features were reviewed. A total of 74 patients with endocervical AIS with or without concurrent squamous intraepithelial lesions or cervical neoplasms were identified. Their mean age at diagnosis was 39.9 years. More than one half of the cases of AIS were not detected from screening Pap tests but were diagnosed during histologic examination of cervical biopsy or endocervical curettage, LEEP, or cone biopsy specimens (~66%). Only a few patients had had a definitive diagnosis of AIS from the Pap tests (10.8%). Other abnormal glandular cytology included atypical glandular cells, not otherwise specified (16.2%), atypical glandular cells favoring neoplasia (5.4%), and atypical glandular cells suspicious for malignancy (1.3%). Abnormal squamous cytology was common in the study population (54%), with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion the most common finding (30%). AIS was diagnosed in 31 of 42 cervical biopsies or curettages, with 16 cases an incidental finding and 15 cases confirming previous abnormal glandular cytology. In addition, AIS was identified in 51 of 53 LEEPs. Approximately 41.5% of those undergoing LEEP had a previous diagnosis of AIS, and 54.7% of the cases were incidental findings. More than one half of the AIS cases harbored significant concurrent cervical lesions, including 26.7% with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, 5.7% with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, 1.9% with invasive squamous cell carcinoma, 20.9% with invasive adenocarcinoma, and 6.7% with microinvasive adenocarcinoma. Our results have demonstrated that the ability to detect AIS with routine screening Pap testing or biopsy/curettage has variable efficacy depending on the screening methods. Given the relatively low combined sensitivity of Pap testing and biopsy/endocervical curettage in the diagnosis of AIS, all LEEPs and cervical cone biopsies performed for squamous cell abnormalities should be thoroughly evaluated for glandular lesions.

Retrospective Review of Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure (LEEP) Outcomes at a Tertiary Hospital in Zambia.

There is a lack of knowledge on the histologic outcomes of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) biopsies in the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of cervical cancer in Zambia. This study determined the outcomes of LEEP biopsies and associated factors at a tertiary hospital. We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients evaluated at a tertiary hospital cervical cancer screening centre. From the database, we identified patients who underwent LEEP between January 2015 and June 2018. We extracted demographic data, HIV data, and LEEP biopsy results. A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. 137 charts were identified, and 114 were included in the final analysis. 23 were excluded for missing histology. The mean age of participants was 36.3 ± 9.6. Histology outcomes revealed that 37% had cervicitis, while CIN 1, 2, and 3 contributed to 27%, 14%, and 3%, respectively. Squamous cell cancer was present in 8% (age groups 35–49) and was three times higher (13%) in HIV-positive compared to HIV-negative participants (3.8%). Normal histology accounted for 11%. Increasing age (P=0.029), less than tertiary education (P=0.0011), and being married (P=0.017) increased the chances of having cancer in the chi-square analysis, while single women had lower odds of having CIN 1 (OR = 0.012) in the multinomial logistic regression. There is a need for increased cervical cancer screening and training in precancer treatment and holistic consideration of other factors like age in addition to the positive VIA test in advising patients on treatment options.

Expression of p16 and HPV E4 on biopsy samples and methylation of FAM19A4 and miR124-2 on cervical cytology samples in the classification of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions.

The decision to treat a cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) by loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) relies heavily on a colposcopy‐directed biopsy showing high‐grade (H)SIL. Diagnosis is often supported by p16, an immunohistochemical (IHC) biomarker of high‐risk (hr)HPV E7 gene activity. Additional potential markers include methylation of tumor suppressor genes FAM19A4/miR124‐2 in cervical cytology for advanced transforming HSIL and the IHC marker HPV E4 for productive, potentially regressing lesions. In 318 women referred for colposcopy, we investigated the relationship between staining patterns of p16 and E4 IHC in the worst biopsy, and the relation of these to FAM19A4/miR124‐2 methylation status in cytology. E4‐positive staining decreased with increasing SIL/CIN grade from 41% in LSIL to 3% in HSIL/CIN3. E4 positivity increased with grade of p16 when p16 expression was limited to the lower two third of the epithelium (r = 0.378), but fell with expression over. Loss of E4 expression in the worst lesion was associated with the methylation of FAM19A4/miR124‐2. We also examined whether these biomarkers can predict the histological outcome of the LEEP biopsy in a subgroup of 119 who underwent LEEP treatment. About 85% of women with ≥lower two third p16 staining/E4‐negative HSIL biopsies and 65% with limited p16 staining/E4‐positive HSIL biopsies had ≥HSIL in the LEEP specimen (P = .025). p16 expression in a biopsy is related both to viral production and transformation, while decreased E4 expression relates to methylation, indicating advanced HSIL. p16 expression in ≥2/3 of the epithelium and absent E4 indicate likely HSIL on a subsequent LEEP specimen.

"See and treat" LEEP biopsy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2/3

Purpose of investigation: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) biopsy using a see-and-treat strategy, and compare outcomes after biopsy, inpatient LEEP and ablation, and inpatient conization with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2/3. Materials and Methods: The authors performed a retrospective study including 300 women with CIN2/3 who were followed up ≥ 6 months following outpatient LEEP/inpatient LEEP and ablation/inpatient conization. Recurrence, additional treatment for recurrence, pregnancy, and term delivery following treatment were evaluated. Results: During the median follow-up duration of 22 months, recurrences were significantly more common following LEEP biopsy (39%) compared to LEEP and ablation (13%) and conization (16%) and were managed by repeat LEEP. Pregnancy and full-term delivery rates following LEEP biopsy were significantly higher. Conclusion: See-and-treat LEEP biopsy was safely performed in the outpatient department. Pregnancy rates and full-term deliveries following LEEP biopsy appear favorable.

Clinical significance of a negative loop electrosurgical excision procedure biopsy in patients with biopsy-confirmed high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

We sought to determine which clinical factors can predict this phenomenon and to better understand the clinical significance of negative loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) findings through long-term follow-up. We identified 559 patients with biopsy-confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 (CIN 2, 3) who were treated by LEEP between February 2001 and December 2010. Preconization clinical characteristics, as well as high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) status, were analyzed as possible predictors of an absence of a lesion in the specimen. The clinical significance of an absence of a lesion in the specimen, as well as other factors, was evaluated by Cox hazard regression analysis in terms of recurrence. No lesion on the LEEP specimen was found in 102 (18.2%) of 559 patients with CIN 2,3 on punch biopsy. Punch biopsy status of CIN 2, low HPV viral load (<100 relative light units [RLU]), and negative or positive HPV infection other than type 16 were significantly related to no lesion in the LEEP specimen. Postoperative HPV persistence (≥10 RLU) and same-type HPV detection were significantly related to recurrent disease of CIN 2+ (p < .001). The recurrence of patients with no lesion in LEEP did not statistically differ from that of patients with a lesion in the LEEP specimen (p = .390). The absence of a lesion in the LEEP specimen is very common. A negative LEEP is associated with a persistence/recurrence rate similar to that of positive LEEP. We recommend that the follow-up for patients with no lesion in the LEEP specimen should be the same as that for patients with a lesion.

Comparison of cold knife cone biopsy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure in the management of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ: What is the gold standard?

ObjectiveTo compare the outcomes of patients with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ (ACIS) treated with cold knife cone (CKC) biopsy or loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) for the treatment of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ (ACIS). Study designThis is a retrospective, population-based cohort study of Western Australian patients with ACIS diagnosed between 2001 and 2012. Outcomes included pathological margin status and the incidence of persistent or recurrent endocervical neoplasia (ACIS and adenocarcinoma) during follow-up (<12months) and surveillance (≥12months) periods. ResultsThe study group comprised 338 patients including 107 (32%) treated initially by LEEP and 231 (68%) treated by CKC biopsy. The mean age was 33.2years (range 18 to 76years) and median follow-up interval was 3.6years (range <1year to 11.8years). Overall, 27 (8.0%) patients had ACIS persistence/recurrence while 9 (2.7%) were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma during the follow-up and surveillance periods. No patient died of cervical cancer within the study period. There were no significant differences in the incidence of persistent and/or recurrent endocervical neoplasia according to the type of excisional procedure. Patients with positive biopsy margins were 3.4 times more likely to have disease persistence or recurrence. Conclusion(s)LEEP and CKC biopsy appear equally effective in the treatment of ACIS for women wishing to preserve fertility. Patients undergoing conservative management for ACIS should be closely monitored, particularly if biopsy margins are positive in initial excision specimens. Patients and their clinicians should be aware of the potential risks of residual and recurrent disease.

Same day colposcopic examination and loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) presents minimal overtreatment and averts delay in treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in Kenyatta National Hospital, Kenya

Background: Screening for cancer of the cervix at Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH), follows the recommended three-step strategy; Papanicolaou (Pap) smear, colposcopy/biopsy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP)/biopsy. This approach poses the following challenges: multiple clinic visits, costly, time consuming, long turnaround time to treatment, non-compliance and loss-to-follow-up. Objective: To determine the agreement between histologies following colposcopy and LEEP amongst women in KNH as a forerunner for opportunity to shift from the three-step approach to the two-step “see and treat” (same-day colposcopy and LEEP) approach. Methods: This was a retrospective descriptive cohort of Women who underwent LEEP procedure between January 2008 and 31st December 2010 following the three-step approach at KNH, Kenya. Results: A total of 124 patients out of the 132 patients who underwent LEEP were included in the analysis. The 8 patients excluded had missing files. HIV infected, uninfected or unknown women are similar socio-demographically. The mean (SD) age for the HIV infected, uninfected and unknown is 37 (6), 33 (10) and 35 (9) years respectively. Colposcopic and LEEP biopsy histology within patients demonstrated a high weighted kappa statistics agreement of 84%. LEEP increased diagnosis of invasive cancer. Patients had a median (IQR) 5 (4 - 6) clinic visits from Pap smear to LEEP treatment. It took median (IQR) 55 (27 - 116) days between Pap smear to colposcopy result and 167 (101 - 276) days between Pap smear results to LEEP treatment. If a LEEP procedure were to be performed in this cohort of women on the same day of the colposcopy biopsy a median (IQR) 77 (55 - 137) days could have been saved. Conclusion: There is a high agreement between colposcopy and LEEP biopsies in our setting offering a window of opportunity to perform “See and Treat” same-day colposcopy and LEEP treatment procedure, skipping the colposcopy biopsy stage.

Comparison of LEEP biopsy and colposcopical biopsy in the diagnosis of CIN

Objective To compare the diagnostic clinical significance between loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) and colposcopical biopsy for cervical intracpithelial neoplasia(CIN). Methods 130 cases of pa-tients diagnosed as CIN under colposcopical biopsy were treated by LEEP in court of gynecology clinic. The conven-tional pathologic diagnosis was recorded in all conization specimens. Results The coincidence rate between colpo-scopical biopsy and LEEP biopsy in CIN Ⅰ, CIN Ⅱ, CIN Ⅲ (not comprised carcinoma in situ) was 55.26%,66.10% ,78.79% respectively;The total coincidence rate was 66.15%. The accuracy of colposcopic biopsy for diag-nosing CINⅢ was higher than that for CIN Ⅰ and CIN Ⅱ,but there was no statistical difference. Conclusion Colpo-scopical biopsy for cervical lesions can be achieved for the frist time the results of pathology, have limitations. LEEP biopsy can compensate partially the deficiency of colposcopic biopsy. In a dear diagnosis of CIN, LEEP biopsy and colposcopical biopsy may complement each other, and achieve thcrpeutic effects. Key words: CIN; LEEP; colposcopy biopsy

Pilot Study of Prevalence of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Genotypes in Israeli Jewish Women Referred for Colposcopic Examination

The objective of the present study was to determine the prevalence of high-risk (HR) human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes in a group of Israeli Jewish women referred for colposcopic examination. Scrape specimens were prospectively collected from 84 women referred for colposcopic examination. All the women underwent Papanicolaou (Pap) smears and colposcopies, and some also underwent cervical or loop electrosurgical excision procedure biopsy. HR HPV was detected in scrape specimens (Amplicor HPV test; Roche Molecular Systems), and the individual genotypes in these specimens were identified (HPV GenoArray test kit; Hybribio Ltd., Hong Kong). Forty-one (49%) specimens were positive by the Amplicor HPV test. Sixty-four samples (41 positive and 23 negative by the Amplicor HPV test) were also assayed by use of the HPV GenoArray kit. The overall level of agreement between the two assays was 93.8% (Cohen's kappa = 0.98). HR genotypes were found in 37/41 (90%) HPV-positive samples. The prevalences of the HR HPV genotypes in the 37 HPV-positive samples were 41% of patients for HPV type 16 (HPV-16), 22% for HPV-39, 19% for HPV-52, and 14% for HPV-18. Forty-one percent of these patients were infected with a single HR genotype, whereas 59% were infected with mixtures of HR genotypes. The presence of a relatively high percentage of HPV types 39 and 52 and the relatively high incidence of infections with mixtures of genotypes may be one of the reasons for the low rate of conversion from high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions to invasive carcinoma in Israeli women. Larger and more comprehensive studies are warranted to investigate this issue in greater detail.

The efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure as compared to cold-knife cone biopsy in patients with unsatisfactory colposcopy.

Our aim was to determine whether the loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) is as efficacious as cone biopsy in patients with cervical dysplasia and unsatisfactory colposcopy. Fifty-four patients with unsatisfactory coiposcopic findings underwent a LEEP procedure for the treatment of their cervical dysplasia. These patients were compared to 41 patients who had a cold-knife cone biopsy for the same indication. LEEP procedures were carried out to a standard ectocervical excision depth of 6 mm and then excised centrally to an endocervical depth of an additional 3 mm. An endocervical curettage was performed after the excision procedure. Patients were examined every 4 to 6 months after treatment with a Papanicolaou smear and colposcopy. The pretreatment cytology and cervical biopsies, histology of LEEP and cone biopsy specimens, and follow-up cytology between the two groups were compared by chisquare analysis. No statistical difference was seen in the pretreatment cervical smears between the LEEP and cone biopsy groups. All LEEP and cone biopsy specimen resection margins were negative. No difference was evident in the grade of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia between the LEEP and cone biopsy groups. Follow-up cervical smear results were similar in both groups. One patient required a cone biopsy for persistent disease 8 months after her LEEP treatment. LEEP appears to be as safe and effective as cone biopsy in patients with unsatisfactory colposcopy.