Longwall Layouts Research Articles

Investigation of ground subsidence response to an unconventional longwall panel layout

Ground subsidence caused by extraction of longwall panels has always been a great concern all over the world. Conventional longwall mining system (CLMS) gives rise to wavy subsidence causing great damage to surface structures. A coal mine in Shanxi, China, utilizes a split-level longwall layout (SLL) for a sub-horizontal No. 8 coal seam to improve the cavability of mudstone interlayer and top coal. This layout, however, also produced unexpectedly favorable surface subsidence. Subsidence of No. 6 and No. 8 longwall panels was monitored while mining was conducted. Field instrumentation and numerical simulation were carried out. It is demonstrated that an asymmetric subsidence profile with stepped subsidence and cracks occurred on the tailgate side but relatively mild and smooth deformation on the other. Due to elimination of conventional parallelepiped gate pillar, No. 6 and No. 8 gobs were connected. Extraction of two SLL panels acted as one supercritical panel. The maximum possible subsidence was reached which lowers the likelihood of potential future secondary subsidence as underground gob fractures and voids have closed. Therefore, SLL is more favorable for post-mining land reuse as gobs are more consolidated underground.

A Comparative Case Study on Stress Redistribution due to Extraction of Conventional and Split-Level Longwall Panels in Deep Inclined Coal Seams

Through field observations, theoretical analysis, and a calibrated numerical model, a study of stress redistribution due to the extraction of longwall panels at depths ranging from 580 to 660 m with a 30° dip angle at Tangshan coal mine is presented in this paper. Conventional and new split-level longwall layouts are compared regarding their stress redistributions. The height of the caved zone is 21.7 m; angles of break of 55.6° on the left and 54.2° on the right side of the gob are observed using cross-measure boreholes. Structural models as well as numerical models are constructed based on the above field data to make the geometry of the gobs closer to the in situ situation and more realistic. Compared with the conventional layout, the theoretical analysis shows that the overall influence of the elevated split-level longwall gob on the lowest intact stratum increases by more than 5.07%, meaning that the split-level longwall layout is more likely to maintain the stability of the overlying strata. This is also corroborated by numerical modeling. Conventional longwall panels and split-level longwall panels with and without considering the gob are all simulated using FLAC3D. Instead of only backfilling the height of the coal seam or the height of the coal seam and the immediate roof, as in many numerical modeling studies in the past, in this study, the whole caved zone is backfilled with “double-yield” material. It is found that along the floor, the split-level longwall gob assumes 23.4% more load than the conventional longwall gob, and the split-level longwall abutment bears 6.2% less load than the conventional longwall abutment; stress arches are developed within the gob; concave-down stress beddings are more evident at higher locations of the gob; a self-supporting structure develops within the gob and surrounding rock mass around the lower end of the gob, forming a protective localized intact destressed zone around the location where the split-level tailgate is situated; the yield zone in the floor of the curved section tends to extends toward the center of the curved part, where the curvature is the maximum; the upper stress concentration zone is within the coal seam, while the lower one is above the coal seam; the upper one is more concentrated.

Review of an Improved Longwall Panel Layout for Ground Control in Longwall Mining

Conventional longwall layout (CLL) for mining coal, trona, etc. is still fraught with problems including low resource recovery, wavy ground surface subsidence, bumps or rockbursts, gateroad support and maintenance, poisonous air hazard, spontaneous combustion in coal mines, instability of equipment at inclined, or steeply inclined working face, etc. In order to improve longwall mining, a novel alternate longwall panel layout that has been employed for over 20 years in China, Australia, and Russia, etc. is proposed termed “split-level longwall layout” (SLL). Gateroads on either end of the same SLL panel are split level, i.e., placed in different levels. This paper provides a review of existing research literature and insights on the problems encountered in CLL and the improvement of the new approach. Theoretical, numerical analysis, and field observation results of the new strategy demonstrate that the problems mentioned above in CLL are mitigated, and the development entries using the improved longwall system have a better stress environment with associated reduction in large roadway convergence, coal bumps or outbursts, and many other issues on ground control. Based on the current development of SLL and the future requirement of mining industry, the prospects as well as its applications, limitations, and concerns for SLL are presented.

Analysis of gateroad stability at two longwall mines based on field monitoring results and numerical model analysis

Coal mine longwall gateroads are subject to changing loading conditions induced by the advancing longwall face. The ground response and support requirements are closely related to the magnitude and orientation of the stress changes, as well as the local geology. This paper presents the monitoring results of gateroad response and support performance at two longwall mines at a 180-m and 600-m depth of cover. At the first mine, a three-entry gateroad layout was used. The second mine used a four-entry, yield-abutment-yield gateroad pillar system. Local ground deformation and support response were monitored at both sites. The monitoring period started during the development stage and continued during first panel retreat and up to second panel retreat. The two data sets were used to compare the response of the entries in two very different geotechnical settings and different gateroad layouts. The monitoring results were used to validate numerical models that simulate the loading conditions and entry response for these widely differing conditions. The validated models were used to compare the load path and ground response at the two mines. This paper demonstrates the potential for numerical models to assist mine engineers in optimizing longwall layouts and gateroad support systems.

Comparison of rockburst occurrence during extraction of thick coal seams using top-coal caving versus slicing mining methods

In recent years, rockbursts have occurred frequently during the mining of thick coal seams in China. Use of the top-coal caving or slicing mining method to extract these thick seams may result in distinct geomechanical responses in the strata and, in turn, the pattern of rockburst occurrence around longwall layouts. To establish a thorough understanding of which method (caving or slicing) is better when it comes to preventing rockbursts during the extraction process, a suite of in situ rockburst measurements was conducted. Six typical rockburst-prone collieries were monitored during which a total of 110 rockburst events occurred. Numerical modelling was used to help interpret the observations. Here, we focus on the analysis of these field observations and the numerical simulations employed to develop a conceptual model for rockburst occurrence during caving mining of thick coal seams. We find that caving mining has a certain rockburst-reducing effect in that the method significantly decreases, or even avoids, the occurrence of rockbursts at coalfaces. Moreover, it reduces the scope of the damage likely to be incurred and the severity and frequency of rockbursting. According to the conceptual model, the rockburst-prone area during caving mining is generally the roadway section located a certain distance ahead of the coalface. This distance, which is roughly 10–54 m, is consistent with the rockburst damage observed on site (mostly 10–50 m ahead of the coalface). This rockburst pattern arises because caving mining results in reduced stress concentration, less bottom coal being retained, and wider-ranging fracture zones around the mine openings, especially ahead of the coalface. This makes the rock surrounding the mine openings less likely to accumulate high levels of elastic energy that need releasing and hence it is more difficult to induce rockbursting. Therefore, it is recommended that the top-coal caving method should be the preferred method of extraction when mining coal seams of a certain thickness.

A limit equilibrium fracture zone model to investigate seismicity in coal mines

This paper explores possible synergies between techniques used to minimise seismicity in deep South African gold mines and their applicability to control coal bumps. The paper gives a summary of the techniques used in the deep gold mines and a critical appraisal if these are useful in coal mines. The techniques typically include control of mining rate, preconditioning, optimisation of extraction sequences and centralised blasting. Of particular interest to the coal bump problem is an experimental limit equilibrium fracture zone model implemented in a displacement discontinuity code. This was recently developed for the gold mines to enable the interactive analysis of complex tabular mine layout extraction sequences. The model specifically accommodates energy dissipation computations in the developing fracture zone near the edges of these excavations. This allows the released energy to be used as a surrogate measure of ongoing seismic activity and addresses a number of the weaknesses in the traditional usage of this quantity as a criterion for the design of seismically active layouts. This paper investigates the application of the model to a hypothetical coal longwall layout and the specific problem of coal bumps.

Improving stress environment in development entries through an alternate longwall mining layout

Most coal mines in China use the longwall mining system. High stresses are frequently encountered around development entries at deep mines. This paper presents an alternate longwall mining layout for thick coal seams to minimize ground control problems. In a conventional longwall panel layout, development entries on both ends of the panel are located along the floor, and a coal pillar (chain pillar) is left between adjacent panels to ensure stability. Gateroads on either end of a longwall panel using the layout proposed in this paper are located at different vertical levels within a thick coal seam or in a geologically split coal seam for improved stability. The headgate entry/ies are driven along the floor while the tailgate entry/ies are driven along the roof. Therefore, a longwall face has a gradually elevated or curved section on one end of the panel. For the adjacent panel, the development entry may be located directly below the development entry of the previous panel or may be offset horizontally with respect to it. Based on physical and numerical modeling approaches, it is demonstrated that the stress environment for development entries employing the longwall layout is significantly improved; ground control problems are therefore minimized.

Monitoring and modelling of gas dynamics in multi-level longwall top coal caving of ultra-thick coal seams, Part II: Numerical modelling

The longwall top coal caving method, which enables the most productive exploitation of thick/ultra-thick coal seams, may result in a distinct geomechanical response of strata and associated gas emission patterns around longwall layouts. A two-way sequential coupling of a geomechanical and a reservoir simulator for the modelling of gas emissions around a longwall top coal caving (LTCC) panels was developed building on the understanding established from the analysis of in-situ gas pressure and concentration measurements carried out at Coal Mine Velenje in Slovenia. Model findings have shown that the modelling method implemented can reproduce the dynamic changes of stresses and gas pressure around a LTCC face and predict the total gas emissions and mixed gas concentrations accurately. It was found that, in LTCC panels, although the rate of gas emission from mined coal depends highly on the coal face advance, floor coal and roof goaf act as a constant and steady gas source accounting for a considerable part of the overall gas emission. Research has shown that, at first and/or second mining levels of multi-level LTCC mining, a notable stress relief and pore pressure drop induced by fracturing of the mined and roof coal can be experienced within 40m ahead of the face-line. In the floor coal, on the other hand, the pore pressure change was found to extend to 20m below the mining horizon. Model results have clearly shown the permeability enhancement and gas mobilisation zones around the LTCC panel, which can be the target zones for gas drainage boreholes.

CFD modelling of longwall goaf gas flow to improve gas capture and prevent goaf self-heating

CFD models have been developed to investigate the longwall goaf gas flow patterns under different mining and geological control conditions. The longwall goaf was treated as porous regions and gas flow was modelled as a momentum sink added to the momentum equation. Gas desorption from the caved goaf and destressed coal seams within the mining disturbed area was modelled as additional mass sources in the continuity equation. These CFD models were developed according to specific longwall layouts and calibrated against field monitoring data. Two case studies were presented demonstrating the application of CFD modelling of goaf gas flow characteristics for improved goaf gas capture and the reduction of oxygen ingress into the goaf areas for self-heating prevention. Results from the case studies indicate that the optimum goaf drainage strategy would be a combination of shallow (near the face) and deep holes to improve the overall drainage efficiency and gas purity. For gassy longwall faces retreating against the seam dip, it is recommended to conduct cross-measure roof hole drainage targeting the fractured zones overlying the return corner, rather than high capacity surface goaf drainage deep in the goaf.

Fault proximity surveys in coal using guided seismic waves?Numerical modelling

Guided seismic waves are generated at lateral discontinuities in coal seams as an integral part of the mechanics of scattering downgoing body waves from a surface energy source. Numerical and laboratory model studies undertaken for both thin and thick coal seam waveguides show that small faults generate recognizable diffraction patterns by convertingP andS waves into channel wave arrivals at in-seam geophones on a walkawayVSP profile. These results suggest that in-seam geophones can be used during subsequent surface reflection surveys so as to improve mine profitability by optimising longwall layout in faulted ground.

Longwall layouts and roadway design for effective strata control in advance and retreat mining : BLADES, MJ UNIV. NOTTINGHAM, GB WHITTAKER, BN UNIV. NOTTINGHAM, GB 3F, 1T, 6R. MIN. ENGR. V133, N161, APR. 1974, P277–288

Longwall layouts and roadway design for effective strata control in advance and retreat mining : BLADES, MJ UNIV. NOTTINGHAM, GB WHITTAKER, BN UNIV. NOTTINGHAM, GB 3F, 1T, 6R. MIN. ENGR. V133, N161, APR. 1974, P277–288