Longer Overall Survival Research Articles

Homologous recombination deficiency score is an independent prognostic factor in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) represents an impairment in the homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway, crucial for repairing DNA double-strand breaks and contributing to genomic instability in cancer. The HRD score may be a more reliable biomarker than HRR-related gene mutations for identifying patients sensitive to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. Despite its relevance in various cancers, the HRD score remains underexplored in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We retrospectively analyzed HRD scores in 96 ESCC patients, examining correlations with clinical characteristics and survival outcomes, and validated our findings using the TCGA dataset. Genomic sequencing utilized a custom superHRD next-generation sequencing panel, and HRD scores were calculated from 54,000 single-nucleotide polymorphisms using Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum tests and two cut-off points for analysis. Higher HRD scores correlated with advanced tumor stages, recurrence, and mutations in TP53 and ABCB1, while APC mutations were linked to lower HRD scores. Patients with high HRD scores had significantly shorter disease-free survival (p = 0.013) and a trend toward shorter overall survival (OS) (p = 0.005), particularly those not receiving adjuvant therapy. Conversely, HRD-high patients undergoing adjuvant therapy showed a trend toward longer OS (p = 0.015). Multivariate analysis identified HRD as an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio = 2.814 for recurrence, p = 0.015). Validation with the TCGA dataset supported these findings. This study highlights the associations between HRD scores, clinical characteristics, and genomic mutations in ESCC, suggesting HRD as a potential prognostic biomarker. HRD assessment may aid in patient stratification and personalized treatment strategies, warranting further investigation to validate the therapeutic implications of HRD scores in ESCC.

Immunoparesis recovery in newly diagnosed transplant ineligible multiple myeloma patients, an independent prognostic factor that complements minimal residual disease.

Information on the prognostic value of immunoparesis (IP) recovery in multiple myeloma (MM) patients has been only generated in some observational and retrospective studies. We have evaluated the prognostic impact of IP recovery and its association with minimal residual disease (MRD) in a series of 113 newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible (NDTI) patients, that received fix duration treatment (18 cycles of VMP/lenalidomide-dexamethasone) within the PETHEMA/GEM2010MAS65 trial and who achieved CR or VGPR. Immunoglobulin levels were measured at diagnosis, at the end of treatment (after cycle 18th) and during subsequent follow up whereas MRD was analyzed only at the end of the treatment (after cycle 18th). We found that patients who had IP at diagnosis and recovered it during or after treatment had longer progression free survival (PFS) [p < 0.001; HR 0.32 (0.19-0.52)] and longer overall survival (OS) [p = 0.007; HR 0.40 (0.20-0.80)] compared to those who failed to recover it. When we analyzed IP recovery in MRD negative patients, we found that those cases with IP recovery had longer PFS [p = 0.007; HR 0.31 (0.13-0.76)] and longer OS [p = 0.012; HR 0.21 (0.06-0.80)] as compared to MRD negative patients but without IP recovery. In conclusion, IP recovery confers better prognosis in NDTI-MM patients with fixed duration treatment who achieve CR or VGPR and the prognostic value of MRD can be complemented when combined with IP recovery.

Association between Tumor Size at the Time of Disease Progression and Survival Outcomes.

This study evaluates the prognostic significance of tumor size at disease progression (PD) and depth of response (DOR) in cancer patients. We performed post hoc analysis using data from six prospective clinical trials conducted by the Korean Cancer Study Group. Patients with tumor size at PD was categorized into 'Mild PD' and 'Significant PD' based on the cutoff values of relative change from baseline using maximally selected rank statistics. The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between PD and DOR categories. Among the 194 evaluable patients, 130 experienced PD. A 35.48% decrease from baseline in tumor size at PD was chosen for the cutoff between mild and significant PD for OS (mild PD: tumor size from the baseline ≤ -35.48%; significant PD > -35.48%). The mild PD had superior OS compared to the significant PD (25.8 vs. 12.8 months; Hazard ratio [HR] 0.47, 95% CI 0.266-0.843, p=0.009). When using an exploratory cutoff based on whether the tumor size was below vs. exceeded from the baseline (mild PD: tumor size from the baseline ≤ 0%; significant PD > 0%), OS remained significantly longer in the mild PD (17.1 vs. 11.8 months; HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.392-0.932, p=0.021). The greatest DOR was associated with the longest OS and PFS (p<0.001 for both). Tumor size at PD and DOR were significant prognostic factors for progressive disease. Maintaining a sufficiently reduced tumor size even during PD was associated with better survival outcomes.

Efficacy and safety of lenvatinib combined with anti-PD-1 antibodies plus GEMOX chemotherapy as non-first-line systemic therapy in advanced gallbladder cancer

BackgroundLenvatinib, programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) antibodies, and gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) chemotherapy have shown significant antitumor activity as first-line therapy against biliary tract cancer. This study evaluated their efficacy and safety as non-first-line therapy in advanced gallbladder cancer (GBC).MethodsPatients with advanced GBC who received lenvatinib combined with anti-PD-1 antibodies and GEMOX chemotherapy as a non-first-line therapy were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and safety.ResultsA total of 36 patients with advanced GBC were included in this study. The median follow-up time was 11.53 (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.2–20.9) months, and the ORR was 36.1%. The median OS and PFS were 15.1 (95% CI: 3.2–26.9) and 6.1 (95% CI: 4.9–7.2) months, respectively. The disease control rate (DCR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) were 75% and 61.1%, respectively. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that patients with programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression had significantly longer PFS and OS than those without PD-L1 expression. Additionally, patients with a neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) < 5.57 had a longer OS than those with an NLR ≥ 5.57. All patients experienced adverse events (AEs), with 61.1% experiencing grade 3 or 4 AEs, including myelosuppression (13.9%) and fatigue (13.3%), alanine transaminase or aspartate transaminase levels (8.3%), and diarrhea (8.3%). No grade 5 AEs were reported.ConclusionAnti-PD-1 antibodies combined with lenvatinib and GEMOX chemotherapy are effective and well-tolerated as a non-first-line therapy in advanced GBC. PD-L1 expression and baseline NLR may potentially predict treatment efficacy.

Morphomics, Survival, and Metabolites in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

Associations of body mass index (BMI) with survival in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) have substantial variability in literature, potentially due to heterogeneous patient populations and retrospective analyses. Additionally, BMI may inadequately describe body composition (ie, morphomics; including subcutaneous and visceral fats, muscle, and fascia), which might have independent biological roles and associations with survival. To study the associations of BMI and morphomics with survival and metabolomics in metastatic PDA. This cohort study prospectively collected patient data, imaging, and serum on the phase 3 trial (Avenger500), which investigated the efficacy and safety of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX) versus modified FOLFIRINOX plus devimistat. The randomized trial accrued 528 patients with chemotherapy-naive, metastatic PDA from Europe, Israel, Korea, and the US between 2018 and 2020. In the present study, per-protocol patients with L1 to L4, T10 to T12 vertebral levels were evaluated. Data analysis occurred from January 2023 to April 2024. Patient data were collected by clinical staff. Morphomics were analyzed from baseline imaging. Metabolites were extracted from baseline serum. A multifaceted statistical approach evaluated associations of BMI and morphomics with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Associations of morphomics with metabolites were also studied. Of the 528 initial patients, 476 (median [IQR] age, 63 [56-68] years; 280 male [58.8%]; median [IQR] BMI, 25.0 [22.1-25.9]) were evaluable for the present study. BMI (obese [≥30] compared with normal [18.5-24.9]) was not associated with OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.90; 95% CI, 0.67-1.22; P for trend = .33). More subcutaneous fat was associated with longer OS (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.41-0.94; P for trend = .02). Higher visceral fat density was associated with shorter PFS (HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.23-2.48; P for trend = .002) and OS (HR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.12-2.00; P for trend = .008). A higher muscle-to-fascia ratio was associated with longer PFS (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.40-0.84; P for trend = .005) and OS (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.41-0.75; P for trend = 1.7 × 10-4). Subcutaneous fat was positively associated with long-chain fatty acid metabolism including pristanic acid, decanoylcarnitine, decenoylcarnitine, and octanoylcarnitine. Muscle-to-fascia was positively associated with metabolites including acetylcarnosine (β = 0.34; 95% CI, 0.21-0.47; P = 1.27 × 10-6). In cohort study of patients with metastatic PDA, BMI was not associated with survival. Higher visceral fat density, subcutaneous fat area, and muscle-to-fascia ratio were associated with survival independent of BMI. The latter 2 were associated with higher levels of animal product metabolism. These findings could represent novel focuses for prognostication and intervention to improve survival of patients with PDA.

Olaparib as maintenance therapy in non resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma associated with homologous recombination deficiency profile: A French retrospective multicentric AGEO real-world study

BackgroundPancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a poor prognosis. The POLO trial showed that olaparib (PARP inhibitor) improved progression-free survival (PFS) but not overall survival (OS), when used as maintenance therapy after ≥ 16 weeks of disease control with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with germline (g) BRCA 1 or 2 pathogenic variants (PV) metastatic PDAC. However, real-world data on the effectiveness of olaparib are missing. MethodsPatients with unresectable PDAC associated with somatic (s) or (g)BRCA1/2 and (g)non-BRCA-HRD PV (i.e. other homologous recombination deficiency/HRD genes) who were treated with olaparib between 2020–2023 were included. The primary objective was to describe treatment patterns. Secondary exploratory objectives included OS and PFS in patients treated with olaparib according to the POLO trial or not, OS and PFS in patients with (g)HRD PV-associated PDAC versus (s)PVs, olaparib safety profile and factors associated with olaparib poor outcomes. ResultsAmong 85 patients, 45.9 % received olaparib as defined by the POLO trial. No difference in OS and PFS was observed between patients who received olaparib according to the POLO trial versus not. Patients with (g)HRD PV-associated PDAC had better OS compared to others (22.3 versus 10.5 months, p = 0.038). Factors associated with olaparib poor outcomes included a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and the use of olaparib outside the recommendations of the POLO trial. Few grade ≥ 3 adverse events were reported (9.4 %). ConclusionPatients with (g)HRD PV-associated PDAC had longer OS than those with (s)HRD PV. Olaparib use beyond the scope of the POLO trial was associated with poor outcomes.

Association of various RAS codon mutations and prognostic outcomes of patients with colorectal liver metastases after hepatectomy.

The prognostic and predictive value of RAS mutations in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) who have undergone hepatectomy holds substantial importance. The present study aimed to investigate the impact of different RAS codon mutations on long-term survival in CRLM patients. A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinicopathological data from 399 CRLM patients with RAS mutations who underwent hepatectomy between January 2000 and December 2020. The RAS mutation gene status was assessed in KRAS codons (G12, G13, Q61, and A146) and NRAS codons (G12, G13, and Q61). Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier plotter and compared using the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to analyze the clinicopathological data. In the entire cohort, patients with KRAS G12 mutations exhibited the most favorable prognosis (p = 0.018). Comparatively, patients harboring KRAS Q61 mutations experienced poorer overall survival (OS) with a median of 15 months versus 33 months (p = 0.011) when compared to those with KRAS G12 mutations. Moreover, patients with NRAS Q61 mutations also showed decreased OS with a median of 26 months versus 33 months (p = 0.020) in comparison to KRAS G12 mutation patients. The results of multivariate analysis showed that both KRAS Q61 mutation (HR 2.130; 95% CI 1.088-4.168; p = 0.027) and NRAS Q61 mutation (HR 2.877; 95% CI 1.398-5.922; p = 0.004) were independent influencing factors of OS. Based on all identified risk factors, patients with RAS mutation were divided into high-risk and low-risk groups. Notably, in the high-risk group, the incorporation of postoperative chemotherapy was associated with longer OS, while it did not improve the survival of patients in the low-risk group. KRAS Q61 and NRAS Q61 mutations are promising predictors for OS in CRLM patients after hepatectomy. Postoperative chemotherapy may significantly benefit CRLM patients with RAS mutations, particularly those identified as high-risk.

Real-world (rw) treatment (tx) patterns and clinical outcomes among patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) receiving first-line (1L) systemic tx and avelumab 1L maintenance (1LM): Results from the IMPACT UC-III study.

390 Background: Avelumab 1LM is a standard of care for pts with mUC that has not progressed after 1L platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC). Immuno-oncology (IO) monotherapy is considered in pts with mUC who are ineligible to receive PBC. Recently approved 1L tx options include enfortumab vedotin + pembrolizumab and nivolumab + gemcitabine/cisplatin. This US retrospective study examined pt characteristics, tx patterns, and clinical outcomes among pts with mUC receiving 1L tx, including avelumab 1LM. Methods: Pts with mUC (bladder cancer; stage IIIB or IV, or ≥2 claims with ICD-10 diagnoses for metastatic cancer) aged ≥18 years, who initiated 1L tx (index date) from Jan 1, 2020 to Jul 31, 2023, were identified from the Healthcare Integrated Research Database (HIRD®; claims and clinical data from the health plan’s Cancer Care Quality Program). Clinical outcomes, including time to next tx (TTNT; time from 1L tx initiation to second-line tx) and overall survival (OS), were evaluated post index date. Pt characteristics and tx patterns were summarized using descriptive statistics. Avelumab 1LM use was identified on/after June 30, 2020 and ≤90 d after 1L PBC discontinuation. OS from the start of 1L tx or 1LM was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Results: Of 2,820 pts with mUC, 1L tx was PBC in 37.0% (n=1,044), IO monotherapy in 39.0% (n=1,099), and other tx in 24.0% (n=677; antibody-drug conjugates and non-PBC). Among pts who received 1L PBC, 15.0% (n=157) initiated avelumab 1LM within 90 days of completing 1L PBC. Avelumab uptake in 2020-2023 by year was 10.8% (Jun-Dec 2020), 29.9%, 34.4%, and 24.8% (Jan-Aug 2023), respectively; 38.9% of pts were still receiving avelumab at the end of the study period. In the 1L PBC and IO cohorts, mean age (SD) was 65.5 (11.1) and 74.6 (10.7) years, respectively. 60% of pts were male. In the 1L PBC and 1L IO monotherapy cohorts, respectively, median follow-up (IQR) was 11.2 (5.6-20.3) and 8.6 (4.0-17.7) months (mo); median TTNT (IQR) was 4.8 (2.8-8.3) and 5.5 (2.8-11.0) mo; and median OS (95% CI) was 29.7 (25.1-37.2) and 20.0 (17.1-25.6) mo. In pts who received avelumab 1LM, median follow-up (IQR) from start of 1L PBC was 14.6 (9.2-21.3) mo; median TTNT (IQR) was 7.6 (6.2-12.3) mo; median time on avelumab tx was 5.0 (1.8-10.2) mo; and 1- and 2-year OS rates, respectively, from start of avelumab 1LM were 78% and 65%, and from start of 1L PBC were 84% and 68% (median OS was not estimable because &gt;50% of pts remained alive at the end of the study period). Conclusions: Despite advances in 1L tx for mUC, IO monotherapy remains a prevailing option for older, commercially insured patients in the US. In this descriptive rw study, pts treated with 1L PBC had longer OS than pts treated with 1L IO monotherapy. Future studies with longer follow-up are needed to further evaluate pt outcomes.

Efficacy of timing‑dependent infusion of nivolumab in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Although an association exists between the timing of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) administration and therapeutic efficacy in several types of cancer, to the best of our knowledge, no reports exist regarding this relationship in gastric cancer (GC). The present study aimed to evaluate the optimal timing of ICI (nivolumab) administration in patients with advanced GC. A total of 58 consecutive patients with advanced GC who received nivolumab monotherapy after ≥2 chemotherapy regimens were retrospectively evaluated. These patients were divided into two groups according to the median time of nivolumab administration: i) Early-timing and (ii) late-timing groups, and the efficacy was assessed in both groups. The early-timing group had significantly longer overall survival (OS) than the late-timing group [median OS 8.2 months; 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.2-12.9 vs. median OS 5.4 months; 95% CI, 3.6-6.1]. Moreover, patients in the early-timing group had significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) than those in the late-timing group (median PFS 2.6 months; 95% CI, 1.3-3.9 months vs. median PFS 1.6 months; 95% CI, 0.9-2.1 months). Furthermore, univariate analysis showed that early timing, immune-related adverse events and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug administration were associated with longer OS and PFS. Cutoff Finder analysis revealed that the optimal timing of nivolumab administration for achieving better outcomes was before 12:06 p.m. Nivolumab administration in the morning, especially before 12:06 p.m., had a better clinical impact on patients with advanced GC.

Contribution of Immunoscore to Survival Prediction in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

The presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) has been demonstrated as a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer after surgical resection of malignancy, but knowledge on their role in pancreatic cancer is lacking. The Immunoscore (IS) assesses TILs at the core of the tumor (CT) and invasive margin (IM) and is being evaluated as a new concept in tumor immunity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between IS and prognosis in PDAC. The IS was analyzed by immunohistochemistry using surgical tissue blocks from 131 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who underwent surgery to investigate the relationship between immune cell infiltration into the tumor and prognosis in PDAC. A high IS in both CT and IM of the tumor was significantly associated with prolonged overall survival (OS) (p<0.01) and relapse-free survival (RFS) (p<0.01). In multivariate logistic regression models adjusted for clinical pathology data, IS predicted survival and recurrence (p<0.01 and p<0.01, respectively). Moreover, in patients who received preoperative chemotherapy, a high IS was statistically significantly associated with longer OS and RFS (p<0.01 and p<0.01, respectively). The immunohistochemically assessed IS might be a useful prognostic marker for patients with PDAC who underwent primary tumor resection.

Peripheral blood cell count composite score as a prognostic factor in patients with colorectal cancer

Objective: To develop a prognostic prediction model for patients with colorectal cancer based on a peripheral blood cell composite score (PBCS) system. Methods: This retrospective observational study included patients who had primary colorectal cancer without distant metastasis, who did not undergo radiotherapy or chemotherapy before surgery, who did not receive leukocyte or platelet-raising therapy within 1 month before surgery, and whose postoperative pathology confirmed colorectal adenocarcinoma with complete tumor resection. Patients with severe anemia, infection, or hematologic diseases before surgery, as well as those with severe heart, lung, or other important organ diseases or concurrent malignant tumors, were excluded. In total, 1021 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent surgical treatment in the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from April 2018 to April 2020 were retrospectively included as the training set (766 patients) and the internal validation set (255 patients). Additionally, using the same criteria, 215 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent surgical treatment in another treatment group from March 2015 to December 2020 were selected as the external validation set. The "surv_cutpoint" function in R software was used to analyze the optimal cut-off values of neutrophils, lymphocytes, and platelets, and a PBCS system was established based on the optimal cut-off values. The scoring rules of the PBCS system were as follows: Neutrophils and platelets below the optimal cut-off value = 1 point, otherwise 0 points; Lymphocytes above the optimal cut-off value = 1 point, otherwise 0 points. The scores of the three cell types were added together to obtain the PBCS. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to explore the correlation between patients' clinicopathological features and prognosis, and a nomogram was constructed based on the Cox regression analysis to predict patients' prognosis. The accuracy of the nomogram prediction model was validated using the C-index, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis. Results: The optimal cut-off values for neutrophils, lymphocytes, and platelets were 4.40×109/L, 1.41×109/L, and 355×109/L, respectively. The patients were divided into high and low groups according to the optimal cut-off values of these cells. Survival curve analysis showed that a high lymphocyte count (training set: P=0.042, internal validation: P=0.010, external validation: P=0.029), low neutrophil count (training set: P=0.035, internal validation: P=0.001, external validation: P=0.024), and low platelet count (training set: P=0.041, internal validation: P=0.030, external validation: P=0.024) were associated with prolonged overall survival (OS), with statistically significant differences in all cases. Survival analysis of different PBCS groups showed that patients with a high PBCS had longer OS than those with a low PBCS (P<0.05). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis results showed that aspirin use history, vascular thrombus, neural invasion, CA19-9, N stage, operation time, M stage, and PBCS were independent factors affecting OS (all P<0.05). The PBCS was also an independent factor affecting disease-specific survival (P<0.05), but not progression-free survival (P>0.05). The above independent risk or protective factors were included in R software to construct a nomogram for predicting OS. The C-index (0.873), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (threshold probability: 0.0%-75.2%) all indicated that the nomogram prediction model had good predictive performance for OS. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the PBCS constructed based on preoperative peripheral blood levels of neutrophils, lymphocytes, and platelets is an independent factor associated with the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer. The nomogram model constructed based on this score system exhibits good predictive efficacy for the prognosis of these patients.

Impact of PIPAC-Oxaliplatin on Functional Recovery, Good Days, and Survival in a Refractory Colorectal and Appendiceal Carcinomatosis: Secondary Analysis of the US PIPAC Collaborative Phase 1 Trial

BackgroundPressurized intraperitoneal aerosolized chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a novel, minimally invasive, safe, and repeatable method to treat carcinomatosis. Evidence regarding the clinical benefit (quality of life and survival) of PIPAC compared with that of conventional standard therapy (ST) is lacking.MethodsThis is the secondary analysis of the phase 1 US-PIPAC trial for refractory colorectal and appendiceal carcinomatosis. A PIPAC cohort was compared with a retrospective cohort of consecutive patients receiving ST. The primary outcome was number of good days (number of days alive and out of the hospital). The secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and objective functional recovery (daily step count).ResultsThe study included 32 patients (PIPAC, 12; ST, 20) with similar baseline characteristics. Compared with the ST cohort, the PIPAC cohort had lower median inpatient hospital stays (> 24 h) within 6 months (0 vs 1; p = 0.015) and 1 year (1 vs 2; p = 0.052) and higher median good days at 6 months (181 vs 131 days; p = 0.042) and 1 year (323 vs 131 days; p = 0.032). There was no worsening of HRQoL after repeated PIPACs. Step counts diminished immediately after PIPAC but returned to baseline within 2–4 weeks. Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated a favorable association between receipt of PIPAC and OS (median, 11.3 vs 5.1 months; p = 0.036).ConclusionCompared with ST, PIPAC was associated with higher number of good days, reduced hospitalization burden, and longer OS without a negative impact on HRQoL with repeated PIPACs. These findings are foundational for evaluation of PIPAC in a randomized clinical trial.

Clinical Impact of Skeletal Muscle Mass and Nutritional Status in Patients with Recurrent or Advanced Gastric Cancer Treated with Nivolumab

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of skeletal muscle mass and nutritional status in gastric cancer patients treated with nivolumab monotherapy as late-line treatment. Methods: We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective study of 90 gastric cancer patients who previously received anti-PD-1 therapy (nivolumab). On computed tomography images captured before nivolumab induction, the skeletal muscle index (SMI, cm2/m2) was defined as the erector muscle area (cm2) divided by the height (m) squared. Patients were divided into two groups: those with SMI-high (n = 45) and those with SMI-low (n = 45). Prognostic nutritional index (PNI) was also calculated before nivolumab induction. The associations of SMI and PNI with response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), and safety were analyzed. Results: The cutoff values for SMI were determined as 13.45 for males and 10.41 for females. SMI-high was significantly associated with a higher RR (odds ratio = 12.36, p = 0.02) and DCR (odds ratio = 2.97, p = 0.02). Although not significant, PNI-high also tended to be associated with a higher RR. Multivariate analysis showed that SMI-high was independently associated with a higher RR and higher DCR in gastric cancer. Moreover, prognostic analyses revealed that SMI-high (log-rank test p = 0.008) and PNI-high (log-rank test p = 0.0008) were significantly associated with longer OS since nivolumab induction. SMI-high was also associated with longer PFS (log-rank test p = 0.03). There were no significant differences in immune-related adverse event between SMI-low and SMI-high. Conclusion: SMI and PNI were associated with nivolumab efficacy in gastric cancer patients. Management of skeletal muscle loss and nutritional status in gastric cancer patients who will receive nivolumab would be beneficial to enhance survival outcomes.

Prognostic value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma treated with systemic chemotherapy

Objectives Although systemic chemotherapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has made progress, ensuring long-term survival remains difficult. There are several reports on the usefulness of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in predicting the prognosis of PDAC, but few reports in systemic chemotherapy. We hereby investigated the usefulness of NLR in systemic chemotherapy for PDAC. Materials and methods A retrospective study was conducted on patients with advanced PDAC treated with first-line systemic chemotherapy. Cox regression hazards models were performed to analyze the association between baseline patient characteristics and the initial treatment response, and overall survival (OS). Results A total of 60 patients with PDAC were enrolled. At baseline, there were significant differences in NLR and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), as well as the selection rate of combination chemotherapy, between patients with partial response or stable disease and those with progressive disease. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that NLR < 3.10, combination chemotherapy, and CA19-9 < 1011 U/mL were significant and independent predictive factors of the initial treatment response. Meanwhile, NLR < 3.10 and combination chemotherapy were independently associated with longer OS. Moreover, OS was significantly prolonged in patients with NLR < 3.10, regardless of whether combination chemotherapy or monotherapy. Patients with NLR < 3.10 at baseline had a significantly higher conversion rate to third-line chemotherapy and a longer duration of total chemotherapy. Conclusions This study suggests that NLR may be a useful marker for predicting the initial treatment response to first-line chemotherapy and the prognosis for patients with advanced PDAC.

A National Cancer Database Analysis of the Characteristics and Outcome of Colon Cancer According to Type of Preexisting Adenoma

BackgroundThe vast majority of colon cancers occur in pre-existing adenomas. Little is known about the impact of adenoma type on behavior and outcome of subsequent carcinomas. The present study aimed to assess characteristics, behavior, and outcome of colon adenocarcinoma based on histologic type of pre-existing adenoma. MethodsUS-National Cancer Database was searched between 2005 and 2019 for patients with colonic adenocarcinoma with known adenoma type who underwent colectomy. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to type of adenoma in which carcinoma developed: tubular adenoma (TA), villous adenoma (VA), and tubulovillous adenoma (TVA)-associated carcinomas. The main outcome of the study was 5-year overall survival (OS). Results66,854 patients were included. 79.3% of carcinomas originated from TVA, 10.2% from VA, and 0.5% from TA. Patients with adenocarcinoma in VA were more often female whereas carcinomas in TA affected patients of Asian race more often. Approximately one-third of carcinomas in villous and tubulovillous adenomas were in the cecum whereas one-third of carcinomas in tubular adenomas were in the sigmoid colon. More TA-associated carcinomas were of clinical T1-2 stage (30.2% vs. 20.8%; P < .001), clinical N0 stage (69% vs. 62.2%, P < .001), and high grade (15.9% vs. 11.5%, P < .001) compared to VA-associated carcinomas. Patients with TA-associated carcinomas had longer mean OS than patients with VA and TVA-associated carcinomas (130.1 vs. 116.9 vs. 123.5 months, P < .0001). ConclusionsAdenocarcinomas that arose in TA had more T1-2 stage and N0 stage, higher grade, and longer OS than did adenocarcinomas that arose in VA and TVA.

Efficacy and safety of RS plus bevacizumab versus RS plus fruquintinib as the third-line therapy in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: A real-world propensity score matching study.

This study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of the combination of raltitrexed, S-1 (RS), and fruquintinib with the combination of RS and bevacizumab in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This retrospective cohort included mCRC patients who received the RS plus fruquintinib or regorafenib as the third-line therapy from May 2019 to April 2023. A propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to balance the baseline characteristics of all patients. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response, and safety of the two regimens were evaluated. Of the 153 patients enrolled, 123 patients received the RS plus bevacizumab and 30 patients received the RS plus fruquintinib. After PSM, 30 pairs were analyzed. Patients treated with RS plus fruquintinib had a longer PFS than those treated with RS plus bevacizumab before PSM (5.0 months vs. 4.3 months, p=0.008) and after PSM (5.0 months vs. 4.4 months, p=0.012). A longer OS was also observed in RS plus fruquintinib group before PSM and after PSM, but there was no statistic difference between two groups after PSM. Both objective response rate and disease control rate were higher in the RS plus fruquintinib cohort than those in the RS plus bevacizumab cohort before PSM, and the difference in values between the two groups reduced after PSM. The adverse effects (AEs) of both groups were well tolerated. In patients with refractory mCRC, RS plus fruquintinib demonstrated a superior OS, PFS than RS plus bevacizumab and had manageable AEs.

Comprehensive analysis of cuproptosis-related genes involved in prognosis and tumor microenvironment infiltration of colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common malignancy, with high incidence and high mortality rates. Cuproptosis, a novel form of copper-induced programmed cell death, contributes to tumor progression. However, whether cuproptosis-related genes (CRGs) play a role in CRC remains unclear. This study aims to elucidate the role of CRGs in CRC development, patient prognosis, and immune response. We performed bioinformatics analysis of the differential expression of CRGs between CRC and normal tissues. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were employed to identify risk factors, which were used to construct a risk score model. Patients with CRC were categorized into high- and low-risk groups based on their median risk scores. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to verify the predictive accuracy of the risk model. A nomogram was developed for CRC through univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. The chemotherapeutic drug sensitivity was compared between patients with high and low CDKN2A/DLAT expression using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Spearman's correlation and TISIDB database analyses were conducted to determine relationships between CDKN2A or DLAT and immune cell infiltration. Eight of ten identified CRGs exhibited significant differential expression between CRC and normal tissues. Among the eight significant differential expression CRGs, CDKN2A and DLAT were identified as independent risk factors for predicting overall survival (OS) in CRC. Patients with CRC in the low-risk group had longer OS than those in the high-risk group. The risk score model had good predictive accuracy for OS. Based on CDKN2A, DLAT and some clinical characteristics, a prognostic nomogram was developed to predict OS for CRC patients and showed good predictive ability. CDKN2A and DLAT expressions were significantly associated with chemotherapeutic drug sensitivity and immune cell infiltration in CRC, and the molecular subtypes and immune subtypes differed between CDKN2A and DLAT. Our research revealed the prognostic value of CRGs, particularly CDKN2A and DLAT, in CRC and demonstrated the relationship between CDKN2A/DLAT and immune infiltration in CRC, thereby contributing to the outcome evaluation of patients with CRC and identifying novel targets for CRC immunotherapy.

Predictive value of prognostic nutritional index as prognostic biomarkers in patients with lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Several research have indicated the significant potential of the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) as a prognostic biomarker in lymphoma patients. However, there is some inconsistency in the findings of a few studies. Hence, to offer a thorough evaluation of the predictive significance of PNI in lymphoma patients, we performed a meta-analysis to examine the prognostic value of PNI for survival outcomes in lymphoma patients. We conducted a comprehensive search for pertinent works published up until December 2023 in databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. We obtained hazard ratio (HR) data related to survival outcomes and computed aggregated HRs with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to evaluate the correlation between PNI and both overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in lymphoma patients. By analyzing data from 1260 patients in 28 studies, we found that PNI levels were associated with prognosis in lymphoma patients. High PNI levels predicted that patients had longer OS (HR: 0.46, 95% CI 0.37-0.58, P < 0.05) and better PFS (HR: 0.56, 95% CI 0.45-0.70, P < 0.05). Subgroup analyses showed that the predictive ability of PNI for patient prognosis may differ depending on the type of lymphoma. In addition, we found that the critical PNI value had greater predictive potential at 40-45 and above 45. Our study suggests a strong association between PNI and prognostic outcomes in lymphoma patients, indicating that PNI holds substantial prognostic value in this population.

Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Combined Lenvatinib and PD-1 Inhibitor Showed Improved Survival for Infiltrative Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

Lenvatinib and programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor on infiltrative hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have obtained demonstrated efficacy and still need improvement. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has shown promising results for advanced HCC. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of HAIC combined Lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor versus Lenvatinib combined PD-1 inhibitor for infiltrative HCC. A total of 232 patients were enrolled. There were 114 patients received Lenvatinib combined PD-1 inhibitor (Len+PD-1 group) and 118 patients received HAIC combined Lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor (HAIC+Len+PD-1 group). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and safety of patients were compared between the two groups by propensity score-matching (PSM). The 6-, 12-, and 24-month OS rates were 93.8%, 65.1% and 13.4% in Len+PD-1 group, and 100%, 77.3% and 32.1% in HAIC+Len+PD-1 group, respectively. The 3-, 6-, and 12-month PFS rates were 86.4%, 45.7% and 14.1% in Len+PD-1 group, and 95.1%, 59.3% and 25.9% in HAIC+Len+PD-1 group, respectively. The HAIC+Len+PD-1 group had obviously better survival than the Len+PD-1 group both in OS (P=0.002) and PFS (P=0.004). Subgroup analysis revealed that OS in patients with metastasis was improved with HAIC+Len+PD-1 treatment. Patients with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) response after treatment showed better survival than the non-response. In addition, HAIC+Len+PD-1 group showed manageable adverse events (AEs). Patient with infiltrative HCC, HAIC+Len+PD-1 treatment had longer OS and PFS than Len+PD-1 treatment. Early AFP response was an effective indicator of better survival and tumor response to therapy.

Anoikis-related subtype and prognosis analyses based on bioinformatics, and an expression verification of ANGPTL4 based on experiments of lung adenocarcinoma.

Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is one of the most common malignant tumors with high mortality. Anoikis resistance is an important mechanism of tumor cell proliferation and migration. Our research is devoted to exploring the role of anoikis in the diagnosis, classification, and prognosis of LUAD. We downloaded the expression profile, mutation, and clinical data of LUAD from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. The "ConsensusClusterPlus" package was then used for the cluster analysis, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to establish the prognostic model. We verified the reliability of the model using a Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) data set. A gene set variation analysis (GSVA) was conducted to investigate the functional enrichment differences in the different clusters and risk groups. The CIBERSORT algorithm and a single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) were used to analyze immune cell infiltration. The tumor mutation burden (TMB) and Tumor Immune Dysfunction and Exclusion (TIDE) scores were used to evaluate the patients' sensitivity to immunotherapy. Immunohistochemical staining of tissue microarrays was used to verify the correlation between ANGPTL4 expression and the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of LUAD patients. First, we screened 135 differentially expressed anoikis-related genes (ARGs) and 23 prognosis-related ARGs from TCGA-LUAD data set. Next, 494 LUAD samples were allocated to cluster A and cluster B based on the 23 prognosis-related ARGs. The Kaplan-Meier (K-M) analysis showed the overall survival (OS) of cluster B was better than that of cluster A. The clinicopathological characteristics and functional enrichment analyses revealed significant differences between clusters A and B. The tumor microenvironment (TME) analysis showed that cluster B had more immune cell infiltration and a higher TME score than cluster A. Subsequently, a LASSO Cox regression model of LUAD was constructed with ten ARGs. The K-M analysis showed that the low-risk patients had longer OS than the high-risk patients. The receiver operating characteristic curve, nomogram, and GEO data set verification results showed that the model had high accuracy and reliability. The level of immune cell infiltration and TME score were higher in the low-risk group than the high-risk group. The high-risk group had stronger sensitivity to immune checkpoint block therapy and weaker sensitivity to chemotherapy drugs than the low-risk group. ANGPTL4 expression was correlated with stage, tumor differentiation, tumor size, lymph node metastasis, and OS. We discovered novel molecular subtypes and constructed a novel prognostic model of LUAD. Our findings provide important insights into subtype classification and the accurate survival prediction of LUAD. We also identified ANGPTL4 as a prognostic indicator of LUAD.