Longer Median Overall Survival Research Articles

Surgery for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Following Induction Chemotherapy: A Single-Center Experience.

The use of surgery in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) following induction chemotherapy is increasing. However, most series do not report on the total cohort of patients undergoing surgical exploration; therefore, this single-center study investigates outcomes among all consecutive patients with LAPC who underwent surgical exploration. We conducted a retrospective, single-center analysis including all consecutive patients with LAPC (Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group criteria) who underwent surgical exploration with curative intent (January 2014-June 2023) after induction therapy. Primary outcomes were resection rate and overall survival (OS) from the time of diagnosis. Overall, 127 patients underwent surgical exploration for LAPC, whereby 100 patients (78.7%) underwent resection and 27 patients (21.3%) underwent a non-therapeutic laparotomy due to the extent of vascular involvement (n=11, 8.7%) or occult metastases (n=16, 12.6%). The overall in-hospital/30-day mortality rate was 0.8% and major morbidity was 31.3% (in patients after resection: 1.0% and 33.3%, respectively). The overall 90-day mortality rate was 5.5%, which included 3.1% mortality due to disease progression. Resection was associated with longer median OS {29 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 26-43) vs. 17 months (95% CI 11-26); p<0.001} compared with patients undergoing non-therapeutic laparotomy, with corresponding 5-year OS rates of 28.4% and 7.7%. In Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, only pancreatic body/tail tumors independently predicted OS (hazard ratio 1.788 [95% CI 1.042-3.068]). This single-center series found a resection rate of 78.7% in patients with LAPC selected for surgical exploration, with a low risk of mortality and morbidity in all explored patients and a 5-year OS rate after resection of 28.4%.

Real-world clinical outcomes and economic burden of early discontinuation of taxane therapy among patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

e17043 Background: Despite comprising an important part of the treatment paradigm for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) for over a decade, real-world use of taxanes is hindered by adverse events (AEs). AEs may lead to early treatment discontinuation, which may adversely affect outcomes. The two goals of this study were to determine the proportion of mCRPC patients who discontinue taxanes early (defining the early discontinuation threshold relative to efficacy results associated with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors [ARPIs]) and to evaluate the impact of early discontinuation on clinical outcomes, AEs, and healthcare costs. Methods: This was a retrospective, observational study of adult men with mCRPC treated with an ARPI as their first-line (1L) therapy and who initiated second-line (2L) therapy with another ARPI or a taxane. The Flatiron Health electronic health record database (07/01/2012–06/30/2020) was used to estimate Kaplan-Meier overall survival (OS) curves for the taxane cohort by the number of cycles received; these were compared with patients who received ARPI at 2L. Cox regression modeling and median PFS and OS values were used to identify the number of taxane cycles needed to achieve comparable OS to ARPI. The number of taxane cycles with similar OS outcomes to ARPI was then considered the threshold for early discontinuation. In addition, the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus claims database (01/01/2013–08/31/2021) was used to estimate taxane-related AEs (based on product information) and associated healthcare costs among patients who did and did not discontinue taxanes early. Results: From Flatiron, 473 2L ARPI patients and 214 2L taxane patients were included. Similar clinical characteristics – e.g., prostate-specific antigen level, ECOG performance status, and Gleason score – were observed between the two cohorts. Overall, 2L ARPI was associated with longer median OS (15.4 vs. 13.6 months) than 2L taxane. The number of taxane cycles needed to reach comparable OS to ARPI was determined to be 8. Patients receiving &gt;8 cycles (n=48; 22%) compared to those receiving ≤8 cycles (n=166; 78%) had longer median OS (18.4 vs. 11.9 months, respectively) and PFS (9.0 vs. 4.3 months, respectively). From PharMetrics, 158 2L taxane patients were included. Patients receiving &gt;8 cycles (n=20; 13%) were more likely to experience an AE (95% vs. 88%) than those receiving ≤8 cycles (n=138; 87%) but had lower mean AE-related total healthcare costs per patient per month ($3,429 vs. $6,334). Conclusions: These results suggest that mCRPC patients need to receive &gt;8 cycles of taxane at 2L to receive more clinical benefit than 2L ARPI. However, the vast majority of patients in the study discontinued taxane early, resulting in shorter survival outcomes compared to ARPI.

Survival and mutational differences based on ESR1 and ESR2 expression in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

8526 Background: Estrogen receptor (ER) can activate MAPK signaling but the contribution of the two classical receptors—ER-alpha ( ESR1) and ER-beta ( ESR2) is unclear. Past trials targeting ER and EGFR in NSCLC lacked efficacy. We evaluated the association of ESR1&amp; 2 expression with the genomic landscape and overall survival (OS) in NSCLC. Methods: NSCLC tumors (N = 21603) were tested at Caris Life Sciences (Phoenix, AZ) with NextGen Sequencing of DNA (592-gene or whole exome) and RNA (whole transcriptome). Mutation prevalence (-Mt) was calculated for pathogenic SNVs/indels. ESR1&amp; 2 expression was split into quartiles (transcripts per million, top (-H) and bottom (-L) quartiles were compared). A transcriptomic signature associated with MAPK activation (MPAS, arbitrary units: AU) was applied. The X2 test was applied, p-value was adjusted for multiple comparisons ( p &lt; .05). Real-world OS was obtained from insurance claims and Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated. Results: There was a greater proportion of females in ESR1-H (53%) versus (v) -L (45%, p &lt; .05) but not in ESR2-H v -L (50% v 50%). There was a greater proportion of adenocarcinoma (AD) in ESR1-H (65%) v -L (44%) and a greater proportion of squamous (SCC) tumors in ESR2-H (27%) v -L (15%) ( p &lt; .001 all). The prevalence of EGFR-Mt and KRAS-Mt was greater in ESR1-H v -L and smaller in ESR2-H v -L. (Table) Of all KRAS-Mt, there was a greater percent of KRAS G12C-Mt in ESR1-H (44%) v -L (39%, p = .001). In EGFR-Mt, ESR1-H/ ESR2-H had a higher MPAS (1.4 AU) than ESR1-H/ ESR2-L (.52), ESR1-L/ ESR2-H (.59) or ESR1-L/ ESR2-L (-1.6, p &lt; .05). In KRAS-Mt, ESR1-H/ ESR2-H (1.7 AU) and ESR1-L/ ESR2-H (1.8) had a higher MPAS than ESR1-H/ ESR2-L (.7) or ESR1-L/ ESR2-L (-.7, p &lt; .001). ESR1-H had longer median OS v -L (22 months (m) v 16 m, p &lt; .001) as did ESR2-H v -L (23 m v 15 m p&lt; .001). ESR1-H/ ESR2-H had the longest OS (25 m) followed by ESR1-H/ ESR2-L (18 m), ESR1-L/ ESR2-H (16 m) and ESR1-L/ ESR2-L (14 m, p &lt; .001). In EGFR-Mt, a significant difference in survival since treatment (SST) with osimertinib was seen for ESR1-L/ ESR2-H (40 m, N = 13), ESR1-H/ ESR2-L (36 m, N = 62), ESR1-H/ ESR2-H (34 m, N = 161) and ESR1-L/ ESR2-L (30 m, N = 138, p = .03). In KRAS G12C-Mt, a significant difference in SST was seen with sotorasib; ESR1-H/ ESR2-H had the longest SST (median not reached, N = 17), followed by ESR1-H/ ESR2-L (17 m, N = 17), ESR1-L/ ESR2-L (13 m, N = 34) and ESR1-L/ ESR2-H (1 m, N = 1, p = .002). Conclusions: ESR1-H had a higher percentage of females, AD, and EGFR/ KRAS-mt v ESR1-L while ESR2-H had no sex difference, more SCC, and fewer EGFR/ KRAS-mt v ESR2-L. ESR1-H/ ESR2-H tumors had the highest MPAS and longest OS and there were SST differences with EGFR and KRAS G12C inhibition. ESR1&amp; 2 may play key roles in activating the MAPK pathway and future trials could consider targeted therapy combined with ER inhibition based on ESR1&amp;2 expression. [Table: see text]

Influence of abdominal fat distribution and inflammatory status on post-operative prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study

PurposeTo evaluate the influence of visceral fat area (VFA), subcutaneous fat area (SFA), the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and total inflammation-based systemic index (AISI) on the postoperative prognosis of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) patients.Methods266 NSCLC patients received surgery from two academic medical centers were included. To assess the effect of abdominal fat measured by computed tomography (CT) imaging and inflammatory indicators on patients’ overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used.ResultsKaplan–Meier analysis showed the OS and PFS of patients in high-VFA group was better than low-VFA group (p < 0.05). AISI and SII were shown to be risk factors for OS and PFS (p < 0.05) after additional adjustment for BMI (Cox regression model II). After further adjustment for VFA (Cox regression model III), low-SFA group had longer OS (p < 0.05). Among the four subgroups based on VFA (high/low) and SFA (high/low) (p < 0.05), the high-VFA & low-SFA group had the longest median OS (108 months; 95% CI 74–117 months) and PFS (85 months; 95% CI 65–117 months), as well as the lowest SII and AISI (p < 0.05). Low-SFA was a protective factor for OS with different VFA stratification (p < 0.05).ConclusionVFA, SFA, SII and AISI may be employed as significant prognostic markers of postoperative survival in NSCLC patients. Moreover, excessive SFA levels may encourage systemic inflammation decreasing the protective impact of VFA, which may help to provide targeted nutritional support and interventions for postoperative NSCLC patients with poor prognosis.

The Relationship Between Health-Related Quality of Life and Overall Survival in Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma in CheckMate 214.

In CheckMate 214 (median follow-up, 25.2 months), nivolumab plus ipilimumab yielded greater overall survival (OS) benefit than sunitinib in patients with intermediate-/poor-risk advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index-19 (FKSI-19) was also more favorable for the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group than the sunitinib group. We investigated whether HRQoL scores can predict OS of patients with 5 years follow-up in CheckMate 214. CheckMate 214 was an open-label, phase III trial in previously untreated aRCC (N = 1096). Patients with intermediate-/poor-risk disease (International mRCC Database Consortium prognostic score ≥ 1; n = 847) were randomized to either nivolumab plus ipilimumab or sunitinib monotherapy. Pooled data for OS and FKSI-19 total and subscales (disease-related symptoms [DRS], DRS-physical [DRS-P], and function/well-being [FWB]) were analyzed. Relationships between HRQoL and OS were assessed using Cox proportional hazard models with baseline and longitudinal scores. Associations between HRQoL changes and OS were assessed by landmark analyses. Patients with higher FKSI-19 total and subscale scores at baseline had longer OS than patients with lower scores (HR ≤ 0.834; P < .0001). Longitudinal models indicated stronger associations between HRQoL and OS (HR ≤ 0.69; P < .001 for each). At 3 months after randomization, patients with stable/improved HRQoL versus baseline had longer median OS than patients with worsened/unobserved HRQoL versus baseline (55.9 and 26.0 months, respectively; HR = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.46-0.67; P < .0001). Results at 6-, 9-, and 12-month landmarks were consistent with these findings. In aRCC, patient-reported outcomes are important for HRQoL and prognostic evaluation. NCT02231749; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02231749.

Associations between BMI, morphomics and survival in 528 patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

637 Background: Literature describing associations between patient body mass index (BMI) and survival in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) remains inconsistent. This heterogeneity may be due to studies using pre-diagnosis BMI and including few metastatic patients despite high prevalence at diagnosis. Furthermore, BMI may not adequately reflect other body compositions such as those reflected via morphomic variables (subcutaneous fat, visceral fat, muscle, and fascia) that may have unique associations with survival. In this study, we sought to explore the relationships between detailed body composition in patients with metastatic PDA on both overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Methods: We evaluated data and scans from a phase 3 clinical trial in which 528 patients with metastatic PDA with no prior chemotherapy were randomized to either FOLFIRINOX or modified FOLFIRINOX plus devimistat. No differences in response rate, median PFS or OS were observed. Of the 528 enrolled patients, 377 had baseline CT scans eligible for morphomic evaluation for which Analytic Morphomics was used to measure body composition. For analysis, morphomic variables were summed across the T10-T12 and L1-L4 vertebrae and then divided into tertiles. BMI at diagnosis was evaluated in tertiles and per WHO standards. Cox proportional hazards models and cubic splines were used to evaluate associations between BMI, morphomic variables and PFS, OS. Univariate and multivariate models were evaluated. Kaplan-Meier plots were created to evaluate median survival times between those in the highest and lowest tertiles (R v4.3.1). Results: We did not observe an association between BMI and PDA patient survival: HR (95% CI) comparing BMI ≥30 (obese) to 18.5-24.9 (healthy weight), PFS 0.96 (0.66, 1.39), p-trend=0.80; OS 0.87 (0.64, 1.18), p-trend=0.30. However, multiple morphomic variables were significantly associated with PFS and/or OS in univariate and multivariate models when comparing the highest to lowest tertile. More subcutaneous fat was associated with longer median OS (12.4 vs 10.5 mos, p=0.006; HR (95% CI) 0.41 (0.25-0.68), p-trend=0.001). More dense visceral fat was associated with shorter median PFS (6.0 vs 9.1 mos, p=0.05, HR (95% CI) 1.52 (1.00-2.33), p-trend=0.047). A higher muscle to fascia ratio was associated with longer PFS (9.3 vs 6.5 mos, p=0.03; HR (95% CI) 0.58 (0.38-0.88), p-trend=0.01) and median OS (13.9 vs 10 mos, p=0.005; HR (95% CI) 0.53 (0.38-0.76), p-trend=0.0004). Conclusions: BMI was not associated with PFS or OS in this large prospective study of patients with metastatic PDA receiving chemotherapy. However, morphomic variables including subcutaneous fat area, visceral fat density, and the muscle to fascia ratio were statistically significantly associated with metastatic PDA patient survival.

Abstract C098: Impact of KRAS mutations and co-mutations on clinical outcomes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Abstract Background KRAS is the most frequently mutated gene in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Over the past decade, targeting KRAS has emerged as a promising approach for PDAC treatment. However, the associations between KRAS mutations status and comutation landscape with clinical outcomes remain understudied. We investigated the impact of KRAS mutant allelic status and genomic co-mutations with clinical outcomes. Methods 803 patients with PDAC who underwent CLIA somatic tumor mutation testing at MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) from 1997 to 2023 were identified after an IRB approval. Tumor genomic alterations, demographics, clinical, molecular, and pathological data were extracted from electronic medical records and tumor registry through the Palantir Foundry platform. An external cohort from PanCAN’s Know Your Tumor® dataset with 408 patients served as the validation cohort. Overall Survival (OS) was calculated from the date of initial diagnosis to death or last follow-up. Pearson’s chi-squared tests (or Fisher’s exact tests) were used to determine the association between groups. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the median OS. Results 703 patients had KRAS gene included in the mutation testing at MDACC from 1997 to 2023. KRAS was the top mutated gene (82%), followed by TP53 (69%), then CDKN2A (20%). In KRAS mutant patients, G12D was the most common variant (39%), followed by G12V (31%), then G12R (14%), and Q61 (6%). In patients tested with multi-gene panels, a co-mutation analysis revealed that the most common co-occurring mutations with KRAS mutation was TP53 (75%), followed by CDKN2A (22%), SMAD4 (14%) and ARID1A (10%). The median follow-up was 41 months and median OS was 19 months in the overall population. KRAS mutation status and subtypes was prognostic of OS (p&amp;lt;0.001). Patients with KRAS wildtype had median OS of 38 months and KRASG12R had median OS of 34 months (HR:1.0, 95% CI 0.71-1.5, p=0.88), while patients with KRASQ61 had worst median OS of 20 months (HR: 1.9, 95% CI 1.2-3.0, p=0.006) and KRASG12D had median OS of 22 months (HR: 1.7, 95% CI 1.3-2.3, p&amp;lt;0.001). Similar findings were observed in patients with stage IV disease (n=302), KRASG12D remained associated with significantly worse OS (HR= 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.6, p=0.009). There was a significant enrichment of KRASG12D mutation in metastatic disease compared to localized disease (stage I-III) (OR: 1.7, 95% CI 1.2-2.4, p=0.001) and enrichment of KRASG12R mutation in well and moderately differentiated tumors versus poorly differentiated tumors (OR: 1.7, 95% CI 1.05-2.99, p=0.04). In the external cohort (PanCAN’s Know Your Tumor® dataset), similar findings were observed. KRASG12R was associated with longer median OS (32 months), while KRASQ61 (16 months, HR: 2.6, 95% CI 0.88-7.8, p=0.02) and KRASG12D (23 months, HR: 1.68, 95% CI 1.06-2.65, p=0.04) were associated with significantly worse median OS. Conclusion Allele specific associations of KRAS mutation with clinical outcomes were identified in PDAC. We found better OS with G12R and worse OS with G12D and Q61. Citation Format: Abdelrahman Yousef, Mahmoud Yousef, Saikat Chowdhury, Kawther Abdilleh, Mark Knafl, Paul Edelkamp, Kristin Alfaro-Munoz, Ray Chacko, Jennifer Peterson, Brandon Smaglo, Robert Wolff, Shubham Pant, Michael Lee, Jason Willis, Michael Overman, Sudheer Doss, Lynn Matrisian, Mark Hurd, Rebecca Snyder, Matthew Katz, Huamin Wang, Anirban Maitra, John Paul Shen, Dan Zhao. Impact of KRAS mutations and co-mutations on clinical outcomes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Pancreatic Cancer; 2023 Sep 27-30; Boston, Massachusetts. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(2 Suppl):Abstract nr C098.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Outcomes in Older Adult Patients With Biliary Tract Cancer

The association of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) with survival in the general population of patients with resected biliary tract cancer (BTC) remains controversial. As such, the role of this treatment in the treatment of older adult patients (aged ≥70 years) needs to be evaluated. To describe the patterns of use of AC and compare survival outcomes of AC and observation in older adult patients following resection of BTC. This retrospective cohort study included 8091 older adult patients with resected BTC with data available in the National Cancer Database from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2019. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: AC and observation. The AC cohort was subdivided into single-agent and multiagent AC treatment. Adjuvant chemotherapy vs observation following BTC resection. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) of patients who received AC compared with observation following resection of BTC as evaluated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models. Inverse probability of treatment weighting and propensity score matching were performed to address indication bias. Between 2004 and 2019, of 8091 older adult patients with resected BTC identified (median [range] age, 77 [70-90] years; 5136 women [63.5%]; 2955 men [36.5%]), only one-third (2632 [32.5%]) received AC. There was an increase in the use of AC across the study period from 20.7% (n = 495) in 2004 to 2009 to 41.2% (n = 856) in 2016 to 2019. Age 80 years or older (odds ratio, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.25-0.33; P < .001) and gallbladder primary site (odds ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.61-0.83; P < .001) were associated with a lower odds of AC. Following inverse probability of treatment weighting, as a composite, AC was not associated with improved survival (median OS, 20.5 months; 95% CI, 19.2-21.7 months) compared with observation (median OS, 19.0 months; 95% CI, 18.1-20.3 months). A longer median OS was associated with single-agent AC (21.5 months; 95% CI, 19.9-24.0 months) but not multiagent AC (19.1 months; 95% CI, 17.5-21.1 months) compared with observation (median OS, 17.3 months; 95% CI, 16.1-18.4 months). This improvement in OS with single-agent AC was not apparent on multivariable analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 0.97; 95% CI, 0.89-1.05; P = .44). However, age at diagnosis of 80 years or older (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.28-1.42; P < .001) and treatment at nonacademic centers (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.07-1.20, P < .001) were associated with worse OS. In this cohort study of older adult patients, AC was not associated with an improvement in survival compared with observation following BTC resection. These findings suggest the need for further study of AC for older adult patients who may benefit after curative intent surgery for BTC.

Class II HLA-DRB4 is a predictive biomarker for survival following immunotherapy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are important treatment options for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC). However, not all patients benefit from ICIs and can experience immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Limited understanding exists for germline determinants of ICI efficacy and toxicity, but Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) genes have emerged as a potential predictive biomarker. We performed HLA typing on 85 patients with mNSCLC, on ICI therapy and analyzed the impact of HLA Class II genotype on progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and irAEs. Most patients received pembrolizumab (83.5%). HLA-DRB4 genotype was seen in 34/85 (40%) and its presence correlated with improved OS in both univariate (p = 0.022; 26.3 months vs 10.2 months) and multivariate analysis (p = 0.011, HR 0.49, 95% CI [0.29, 0.85]). PFS did not reach significance (univariate, p = 0.12, 8.2 months vs 5.1 months). Eleven patients developed endocrine irAEs. HLA-DRB4 was the predominant genotype among these patients (9/11, 81.8%). Cumulative incidence of endocrine irAEs was higher in patients with HLA-DRB4 (p = 0.0139). Our study is the first to suggest that patients with metastatic NSCLC patients on ICI therapy with HLA-DRB4 genotype experience improved survival outcomes. Patients with HLA-DRB4 had the longest median OS (26.3 months). Additionally, we found a correlation between HLA-DRB4 and the occurrence of endocrine irAEs.

Abstract A111: Impact of KRAS mutations and co-mutations on clinical outcomes in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Abstract KRAS is the most frequently mutated gene in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Over the past decade, targeting KRAS has emerged as a promising approach for PDAC treatment. However, the associations between KRAS mutations status and comutation landscape with clinical outcomes remain understudied. We investigated the impact of KRAS mutant allelic status and genomic co-mutations with clinical outcomes. 803 patients with PDAC who underwent CLIA somatic tumor mutation testing at MDACC from 1997 to 2023 were identified after an IRB approval. Tumor genomic alterations, demographics, clinical, molecular, and pathological data were extracted from electronic medical records and tumor registry through the Palantir Foundry platform. An external cohort from PanCAN’s Know Your Tumor® dataset with 408 patients served as the validation cohort. Overall Survival (OS) was calculated from the date of initial diagnosis to death or last follow-up. Pearson’s chi-squared tests (or Fisher’s exact tests) were used to determine the association between groups. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the median OS. 703 patients had KRAS gene included in the mutation testing at MDACC from 1997 to 2023. KRAS was the top mutated gene (82%), followed by TP53 (69%), then CDKN2A (20%). In KRAS mutant patients, G12D was the most common variant (39%), followed by G12V (31%), then G12R (14%), and Q61 (6%). In patients tested with multi-gene panels, a co-mutation analysis revealed that the most common co-occurring mutations with KRAS mutation was TP53 (75%), followed by CDKN2A (22%), SMAD4 (14%) and ARID1A (10%). The median follow-up was 41 months and median OS was 19 months in the overall population. KRAS mutation status and subtypes was prognostic of OS (p&amp;lt;0.001). Patients with KRAS wildtype had median OS of 38 months and KRASG12R had median OS of 34 months (HR:1.0, 95% CI 0.71-1.5, p=0.88), while patients with KRASQ61 had worst median OS of 20 months (HR: 1.9, 95% CI 1.2-3.0, p=0.006) and KRASG12D had median OS of 22 months (HR: 1.7, 95% CI 1.3-2.3, p&amp;lt;0.001). Similar findings were observed in patients with stage IV disease (n=302), KRASG12D remained associated with significantly worse OS (HR= 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.6, p=0.009). There was a significant enrichment of KRASG12D mutation in metastatic disease compared to localized disease (stage I-III) (OR: 1.7, 95% CI 1.2-2.4, p=0.001) and enrichment of KRASG12R mutation in well and moderately differentiated tumors versus poorly differentiated tumors (OR: 1.7, 95% CI 1.05-2.99, p=0.04). In the external cohort (PanCAN’s Know Your Tumor® dataset), similar findings were observed. KRASG12R was associated with longer median OS (32 months), while KRASQ61 (16 months, HR: 2.6, 95% CI 0.88-7.8, p=0.02) and KRASG12D (23 months, HR: 1.68, 95% CI 1.06-2.65, p=0.04) were associated with significantly worse median OS. Allele specific associations of KRAS mutation with clinical outcomes were identified in PDAC. We found better OS with G12R and worse OS with G12D and Q61. Citation Format: Abdelrahman Yousef, Mahmoud Yousef, Saikat Chowdhury, Kawther Abdilleh, Mark Knafl, Paul Edelkamp, Kristin Alfaro-Munoz, Ray Chacko, Jennifer Peterson, Brandon Smaglo, Robert Wolff, Shubham Pant, Michael Lee, Jason Willis, Michael Overman, Sudheer Doss, Lynn Matrisian, Mark Hurd, Rebecca Snyder, Matthew Harold Katz, Huamin Wang, Anirban Maitra, John Paul Shen, Dan Zhao. Impact of KRAS mutations and co-mutations on clinical outcomes in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2023 Oct 11-15; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2023;22(12 Suppl):Abstract nr A111.

A Retrospective Chart Review of Treatment Patterns and Overall Survival among a Cohort of Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Mycosis Fungoides in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom

(1) Background: Most patients with mycosis fungoides (MF), a form of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), develop relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease following front-line systemic therapy. This report describes treatment patterns and outcomes from the subpopulation with R/R MF. (2) Methods: This observational, retrospective, cohort study analyzed patient records (1984–2016) from 27 clinical sites in Europe. Outcomes included treatments received, response to first-, second- and third-line treatment, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). (3) Results: Of 104 patients with MF, 100 received second-line and 61 received third-line therapy. The median (range) times from the start of first-line therapy to the first R/R MF and from the first to the second R/R MF were 11.2 (0.3–166.5) and 13.5 (0.0–174.6) months, respectively. Second-and third-line treatment options varied and comprised systemic therapies (85% and 79% of patients, respectively), radiotherapy (32% and 34%, respectively) and topical therapies (48% and 36%, respectively). The median (95% confidence interval [CI]) OS from the diagnosis of the first R/R MF was 11.5 (6.5–not reached [NR]) years and was higher with non-chemotherapy (NR) versus chemotherapy (6.5 years); the estimated median PFS (95% CI) from the time of the first R/R MF was 1.3 (1.0–2.1) years. (4) Conclusions: High rates of R/R disease were observed after second- and third-line treatments in this real-world cohort, with longer median OS in patients receiving non-chemotherapy treatment versus chemotherapy. Following the standard management of MF and using recently approved targeted therapies can help improve patient outcomes in advanced-stage MF.

ASXL1/ TET2 Genotype-Based Risk Stratification Outperforms ASXL1 Mutational Impact and Is Independent of Mutant Variant Allele Fractions (VAF) in CMML

Introduction Truncating ASXL1 mutations in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) are associated with inferior overall survival (OS) and leukemia free survival (LFS). Conversely, loss-of-function mutations in TET2 are associated with better outcomes, with the ASXL1wt/ TET2mut genotype being associated with the best OS and LFS-rates (Coltro G, et al. Leukemia. 2020). Contemporary CMML prognostic scoring systems - such as the Mayo Molecular Model (MMM; Patnaik MM, et al. Leukemia. 2014) and the CPSS-Molecular Model (CMM; Elena C, et al. Blood. 2016) - do not consider concomitant ASXL1/ TET2 mutational status or mutational VAF. We hypothesized that the ASXL1/ TET2 genotype would better risk stratify patients in comparison to ASXL1 mutations alone, and that this effect would be proportional to the underlying mutational VAF. Methods After IRB approval, we compiled a large (n = 888), molecularly annotated database of CMML patients seen at two US medical centers (Mayo Clinic and MD Anderson) via retrospective chart review. All statistical analyses considered the clinical and laboratory parameters obtained at the time of presentation to the respective institution. Categorical variables were compared by Fisher exact or Pearson χ 2 tests and continuous variables by Mann-Whitney U tests. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Survival was assessed via the Kaplan-Meier method. P-values &amp;lt; 0.05 were considered significant. All statistical calculations were performed using the BlueSky Statistics (v10.3.1) interface for R. Results The median age of the cohort was 71 years (range 20 - 94), 67% were male, 46% had proliferative CMML (pCMML), and 19% had CMML-2. The distribution of low, intermediate-1, intermediate-2, and high-risk patients was 15%, 11%, 32%, and 42% by the MMM and 9%, 23%, 40%, and 28% by the CMM, respectively. The most frequently mutated genes were ASXL1 (45%), TET2 (43%), SRSF2 (41%), and RUNX1 (17%), while 40% harbored at least one RAS pathway mutation ( NRAS 16%, CBL 15%, KRAS 8%, PTPN11 4%, FLT3 2%). The median OS and LFS of the entire cohort were 31.8 months (95% CI 28.4 - 33.5 months) and 28.4 months (95% CI 24.6 - 32.1 months), respectively. Patients were stratified into ASXL1wt/ TET2wt (28%), ASXL1mut/ TET2wt (29%), ASXL1wt/ TET2mut (26%), and ASXL1mut/ TET2mut (17%) genotypes. Those with isolated TET2 mutations had the longest median OS (53.6 months; p &amp;lt; 0.02 for all comparisons) whereas those with isolated ASXL1 mutations had the shortest median OS (20.9 months; p &amp;lt; 0.04 for all comparisons); mutations in neither or both genes performed similarly (p = 0.9224; Figure 1A). The same trend was seen for LFS. We further hypothesized that the ASXL1 or TET2 mutation VAF would be more predictive of outcomes than a binary metric. The respective median VAFs were 37% (quartiles 28% - 45%) and 45% (quartiles 40% - 49%). When treated as a continuous variable, however, there was no correlation between either VAF and OS or LFS by both Pearson linear regression and Cox proportional hazard modeling. Unlike the overall cohort, the ASXL1/ TET2 genotypes did not further stratify patients with pCMML, CMML-2, or those considered high risk by the CMM in Kaplan-Meier analyses, suggesting that the high-risk features inherent in these subgroups outweigh the benefits of the TET2 mutation. In contrast, patients considered high-risk by the MMM were further stratified by the ASXL1/ TET2 genotypes. Incorporating TET2 mutations into the MMM as a protective factor (worth -1.5 points) improved detection of low- (≤ 1 point) and high-risk (≥ 4 points) patients, while intermediate-1 and intermediate-2 coalesced into a single intermediate risk category ( Figure 1B). A similar phenomenon was observed when TET2 was incorporated into the CMM (worth -1 point, yielding low- (0 points), intermediate- (1-2 points), and high-risk (≥ 3 points) groups with median OS of 83 months (95% CI 66.2 - 104.2), 34.3 months (95% CI 31.6 - 38.7), and 17.7 months (95% CI 15.7 - 20.2), respectively. Conclusions Truncating and hypomorphic TET2 mutations are associated with better outcomes in CMML, with the ASXL1mut/ TET2wt genotype being associated with improved risk stratification in comparison to ASXL1 mutational status alone. Counterintuitively, in our data set, this stratification was not impacted by mutational VAF, supporting binary mutational assessments in prognostic models.

Clinical, Cytogenetic and Molecular Characterization of a 96 MDS and AML Cohort with TP53 Mutation

Introduction The last European LeukamiaNet (ELN) recommendations (Döhner H. et al. Blood. 2022) and the International Consensus Classification (ICC, Hasserjian R.P. et al. Virchows Arch. 2023) described a new entity, called myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)/ acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with TP53 mutation ( TP53mut), comprising high-risk MDS with an excess of bone marrow blasts cells (more than 10%) and a TP53 mutation (variant allele frequency VAF ≥ 10%). They suggested that MDS and AML represent a biologic continuum rather than two distinct diseases separated by a blast cutoff. Among teams who worked on that topic, T. Grob et al. ( Blood. 2022) studied the molecular characterization of high-risk AML and MDS with TP53mut and suggested that these two types of pathologies should be considered as a single entity, with no difference in molecular characteristics or survival. In this study, we describe the clinical, cytogenetic, and molecular characteristics of a cohort of 96 MDS and AMLs with TP53mut. Patients and methods We included all the patients with AML, MDS/AML, MDS with increased blasts (MDS-IB1) and MDS-low blast (MDS-LB) with at least one TP53mut (VAF ≥ 1%) received between Aug. 2020 and Dec. 2022 at the Institut Paoli-Calmettes (IPC, Marseille, France). Clinical and biological data were extracted retrospectively from the AML IPC database. Morphologic and cytogenetic data were analyzed by standard techniques. NGS was performed using a custom targeted panel of 60 genes (Custom Myeloid Lymphoid Solution, SOPHIA GENETICS). Results We registered 96 patients with a TP53 mutation (VAF ≥ 1%), divided into AML (n=60), MDS/AML (n=14), MDS-IB1 (n=12) and MDS-LB (n=10). Median age was 71 (range, 28-88). Thirty-eight patients had been treated for a prior solid malignancy and 26 patients had a history of myeloid malignancy. TP53mut was detected at diagnosis for 85 patients and at relapse or during follow-up for 12 patients (no NGS data available at diagnosis). We detected 142 mutations in the TP53 gene, mostly missense (73%) between exon 4 and exon 11 with a median VAF of 39% (Figure 1). We found 3 hotspots mutations in positions 273, 248 and 220 with respectively 9, 9 and 8 mutations. Biallelic status (presence of ≥ 2 mutations or a mutation + a deletion) was found in 66 patients (69%). Karyotypes were available for 95 patients. The karyotype was abnormal in 88% of cases, complex in 71% and unfavorable in 80% of cases according to ELN classification or Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (R-IPSS). Complete NGS analysis revealed at least one mutation in 59 of the other genes of the panel in 67 patients (70%), the most frequent being DNMT3A (22%), TET2 (17%), ASXL1 (13%) and PPM1D (11%) (Figure 2). In our cohort of TP53mut LB-MDS (n=10), we found that 9/10 patients had co-mutations in DNMT3A (n=4) , TET2 (n=6) and PPM1D (n=2) genes, 7/10 with biallelic status and 3/10 with complex karyotype. AML and MDS/AML patients with TP53mut detected at diagnosis (n=65) were treated with intensive chemotherapy (n=13), VEN-AZA (n=26), non-intensive therapy (n=14) or best supportive care (BSC, n=12). Seventeen patients were treated with allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (ASCT). With a median follow-up (FU) of 13 months, median overall survival (OS) of the whole cohort was 7 months (ranges, 1-41). Median OS in the AML and MDS/AML group was 6 months (ranges, 1-41). Patients treated with non-intensive approach had the longest median OS (15 months) compared to patients treated with intensive chemotherapy and VEN-based approaches (8 and 6 months, respectively) and patients treated with BSC (1 month, p=0.02). Patients with MDS-IB1 and MDS-LB had 11-months median OS (ranges, 1-28). The four patients treated with upfront ASCT were still alive at the last FU date and have an estimated median OS of 18.5 months (ranges, 6-26). Conclusion Our data confirm that MDS and AML with TP53 mutation are frequently associated with complex karyotypes and have a poor prognosis. nterestingly we identified mutations in PPM1D gene, involved in TP53 pathway, in 11% of cases. Patients with AML or MDS/AML treated with non-intensive approach seem to have the longest OS (15 months). Patients with MDS-IB1 or MDS-LB treated with upfront ASCT seem to have a prolonged OS (18.5 months). Clinical, functional and mechanistic studies are required to complete these findings.

Patterns of progression on first line osimertinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A Swiss cohort study

AimOsimertinib is a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) approved for patients with EGFR mutated non-small cell lung cancer as first-line treatment. However, treatment resistance inevitably emerges and may present as oligo-progressive disease (OPD) or systemic progressive disease (SPD). The incidence of OPD on first-line osimertinib is unknown. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed patients who received first-line osimertinib at 13 Swiss centers. The rate of OPD (PD in ≤ 5 lesions) and treatment outcomes were analyzed. ResultsThe median age of the 148 patients was 68.2 years (range. 38.0–93.3). There were 62 % females, 83 % with a PS ≤ 1, 59 % never smokers, 57 % of patients with an EGFR exon 19 deletion and 37 % with EGFR p.L858R exon 21. 77 % experienced OPD. Median overall survival (OS) was 51.6 months (95 % CI, 38.4–65.0). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 19.2 (95 % CI, 14.3–23.5) and 8.7 (95 % CI, 2.8–15.6) months for patients with common and uncommon EGFR mutations. Patients with OPD compared to SPD had a significantly longer time to treatment failure and longer OS of (22.9 vs. 10.8 months, p < 0.001 and 51.6 vs. 26.4 months, p = 0.004, respectively). The most common organ sites of PD were lung (62 %), brain (30 %), lymph nodes (30 %), bone (27 %) and pleura (27 %). Twenty-six patients (45 %) with OPD received local ablative treatment (LAT). The OS of OPD patients with LAT was 60.0 (95 % CI, 51.6-NA) vs. 51.4 (95 % CI 38.4–65.3) months (p = 0.43) without LAT. ConclusionThe rate of OPD of patients receiving first line osimertinib was 77 %. Patients with OPD had a significantly better OS compared to patients with SPD (51.6 vs. 26.4 months). Patients with OPD receiving LAT had the longest median OS (60.0 months).

Real-world overall survival (OS) of patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) receiving first-line (1L) systemic therapy (tx): Results from IMPACT UC II.

529 Background: Urothelial cancer (UC) is the most common urinary system cancer. The IMPACT UC II study aimed to assess tx patterns and clinical outcomes in pts with mUC treated with platinum-based chemotherapy or immuno-oncology monotherapy (IO-mono) in 1L. Methods: This was a retrospective claims analysis of pts diagnosed with mUC from July 2015 to June 2020 and continuously enrolled for 6 mo before and ≥6 mo after index date (ie, date of first claim) using Optum Research Database, which represents ≈8% of commercially insured and 18% of Medicare Advantage (MAPD) populations. Pts were followed up until disenrollment, study end in August 2021, or death. Analyses examined OS and time to 2L tx (TT2L) in three tx cohorts: cisplatin (cis)-based, carboplatin (carbo)-based, or IO-mono. Results: Of 3,006 pts diagnosed with mUC, 1,037 received 1L tx: 365 (35.2%) with cis-based tx; 337 (32.5%) with carbo-based tx, and 335 (32.3%) with IO-mono. Among treated pts, mean age was 72.5 years (SD, 9.9 years), 72.3% were male, and 77.4% were MAPD insured. At baseline, pts receiving cis-based tx had a lower percentage of ≥3 comorbidities (defined by National Cancer Institute criteria): cis-based, 22.2%; carbo-based, 39.5%; and IO-mono, 45.1%. Among 290 pts (27.9%) receiving 2L tx, carbo-based tx had the shortest median TT2L (5.7 mo). Pts receiving cis-based tx had the longest median OS (27.4 mo). Relative to cis-based tx, multivariable–adjusted mortality risk was 2 times higher with IO-mono (hazard ratio [HR], 2.0; 95% CI, 1.6-2.5) and 1.5 times higher with carbo-based tx (HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.3-1.9) (Table). Conclusions: This study shows that, before avelumab 1L maintenance approval, the majority of pts did not receive any systemic anticancer tx. following mUC diagnosis. In 1L, after multivariable adjustment (including for baseline comorbidities), real-world OS was lower in pts receiving carbo-based tx and IO-mono compared with cis-based tx. Future research should examine outcomes with newer standard of care.[Table: see text]

Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in U.S. Military Veterans Diagnosed With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

IntroductionU.S. veterans in the Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System are managed in a national single-payer system with access to FDA-approved therapies. Prescribing patterns and outcomes of patients with CLL manage in the VA system are described. Patients and MethodsThis is a retrospective analysis of adult patients diagnosed with CLL managed in the VA from January 1999 through December 2020. First line treatment patterns are trended over 20 years. Factors associated with survival were analyzed in both untreated and treated patients. ResultsIn the final analysis, 16,331 patients with CLL were included. The median overall survival (OS) for the whole cohort was 8.7 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.6-8.9). The median OS from diagnosis was 8.9 years (95% CI, 8.6-9.2 in untreated patients with CLL. In treated patients, the median time to first line treatment was 1.9 years (range, 0-21 years), and the median OS from initiation of treatment was 5.0 years (95% CI, 4.8-5.2). First line treatments varied over time, consistent with FDA approval of targeted therapies. Exposure to targeted therapies as either first line or in subsequent lines of therapy was associated longer survival: median OS of 8.5 years (95% CI, 8.0-9.1) compared to 3.5 years (95% CI, 3.5-3.9) in patients who never received targeted therapy (P < .0001). ConclusionPatients treated in the VA have received therapies in line with current evidence-based treatment practices over the past 20 years. Treatment with targeted therapies is associated with longer median OS both in the first line and relapsed/refractory setting.

Survival outcomes in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer undergoing radical vs. partial cystectomy

While radical cystectomy (RC) is the standard of care for muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), partial cystectomy (PC) is an effective alternative in select patients. We sought to examine differences in survival for RC and PC in a hospital-based registry. We identified patients diagnosed with cT2−4 bladder cancer who underwent RC or PC from 2003 to 2015 in the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Using inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) to control for known confounders, we compared the primary outcome of overall survival (OS) in patients who underwent RC vs. PC. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling were used. We performed a secondary survival analysis for a subcohort of patients with cT2, cN0, tumor size ≤5 cm, and no concurrent carcinoma in situ (CIS), who may be optimal candidates for PC. A total of 22,534 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 6.9% (1,457) underwent PC. RC had longer median OS than PC (67.8 vs. 54.1 months) and on Cox regression analysis (HR 0.88, 95% CI, 0.80–0.95, P = 0.002). However, in our subcohort, there was no difference in OS between RC and PC (HR 1.02, 95% CI, 0.9–1.2, P = 0.74). PC was associated with increased time from surgery to any systemic therapy or death in the subcohort. Among patients with clinically organ-confined MIBC, PC appears to afford similar survival outcomes to RC in a large national data set. The safety and tolerability of PC may warrant consideration in highly selected patients.

Clinical and Economic Outcomes in Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Receiving First-Line Systemic Treatment (the IMPACT UC I Study).

The IMPACT UC I study assessed real-world treatment patterns, outcomes, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and costs in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) receiving first-line (1L) systemic treatment after the FDA approval of 1L immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy. This retrospective study used 100% Medicare fee-for-service claims from 1/1/2015 to 6/30/2019 to identify patients aged ≥18 years diagnosed with UC with evidence of metastatic disease, continuously enrolled for 6 months before and after initial diagnosis. Patients were grouped by 1L treatment: cisplatin-containing chemotherapy, carboplatin-containing chemotherapy, ICI monotherapy, or nonplatinum-containing therapy. Unadjusted time on 1L treatment (TOT), overall survival (OS), HCRU, and total healthcare costs were analyzed. Of 18 888 patients with mUC, 8630 (45.7%) had received identified 1L systemic treatment; platinum-containing chemotherapy was the most common (cisplatin-containing chemotherapy, 37.6%; carboplatin-containing chemotherapy, 30.2%). Cisplatin- and carboplatin-containing chemotherapy had the shortest time-to-treatment initiation (median, 1.7-3.0 months) and longest TOT (median, 4.0-4.3 months). Median OS was longest with cisplatin-containing chemotherapy (20.0 months) and shortest with ICI monotherapy (7.6 months). Cisplatin- and carboplatin-containing chemotherapy were associated with highest HCRU; total healthcare costs were approximately 2-fold higher with ICI monotherapy vs other 1L treatments ($10 359 vs $5042-$5709 per patient per month). 1L platinum-containing chemotherapy resulted in the longest median OS and highest HCRU, whereas 1L ICI treatment had the shortest median OS and the highest costs. Over 50% of patients diagnosed with advanced UC (aUC) received no systemic therapy, highlighting the importance of optimal 1L treatment decisions in aUC.

Survival analysis comparing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus perioperative chemotherapy for locoregional gastric cancer.

e16097 Background: Surgical resection is established as the only potentially curative approach for patients with early stage and regional gastric cancer. With a high risk of recurrence that ranges between 40% to 60% for stage II and III disease, combination therapies including chemotherapy and radiation that complement surgery were incorporated as standard of care for Stage &gt;IB disease with clear survival benefit over surgery alone. While the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NCR) or perioperative chemotherapy (PC) for clinical Stage T2 or higher, there has been no consensus on the optimal treatment approach for these patients. Our study sought to compare survival differences between the two therapies. Additionally, we analyzed predictive factors and shifting trends in the choice of treatment over the period of our study i.e., 2010 to 2017. Methods: The National Cancer Database was used to analyze patients with non-metastatic regional gastric cancer diagnosed from 2010 to 2017 staged as clinical T2 or higher. Demographic data and clinicopathological tumor characteristics were assessed using chi-square analysis to assess baseline differences between both groups. The primary outcome was to determine differences in overall survival (OS) using Kaplan Meier (KM) and Cox proportional hazards analysis. The secondary outcome was to evaluate patient related factors associated with the choice of treatment. Results: N = 7475 patients with non-metastatic clinical T2+ gastric cancer were included in the study (NCR: n = 5394, 72.16% vs. PC: n = 2081, 27.84%). The majority of patients were of male sex (75.9%) and within the 50-69 age group (64.5%) for both groups. T3 clinical staging was the most prevalent among both groups (78.0% and 70.3% respectively). Patients receiving PC had longer median OS (49.480 months) than those undergoing NCR (40.970 months). KM curve showed a higher cumulative survival with PC over NCR at 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year endpoints (0.93 vs. 0.85, 0.58 vs. 0.54, and 0.46 vs. 0.40, p&lt;0.0001). Moreover, on multivariate cox regression analysis, OS was inferior in the NCR group (HR 1.57, p&lt;0.001) compared to PC after adjusting for significant covariates. In a subgroup analysis for clinical T3 and T4 tumors, NCR remained associated with worse OS (HR 1.83, p &lt;0.0001) compared to PC. Lastly, patients in the 70-79 and 80-100 age group preferred NCR over the PC approach (OR 0.737 and OR 0.50, p 0.035 and p 0.008, respectively) when compared to the younger population. Cochran-Armitage Trend Test revealed NCR (p &lt;0.0001) and PC (p &lt;0.0001) had an increased trend by year. Conclusions: In our study, PC showed clear survival benefits over NCR in patients with locoregional gastric cancer. Future large-scale clinical trials would aid in adding to our findings and setting guidelines for optimal management of these patients.

Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes for patients with advanced melanoma treated with immunotherapy or targeted therapy.

To identify real-world patterns of first line treatment, treatment sequence and outcomes for older adults diagnosed with advanced melanoma who received immunotherapy or targeted therapy. The study population included older adults (ages 65+) diagnosed with unresectable or metastatic melanoma between 2012 and 2017 and who received first line immunotherapy or targeted therapy. Using the linked surveillance, epidemiology, and end results-medicare data, we described patterns of first line treatment and treatment sequence through 2018. We used descriptive statistics to report patient and provider characteristics by first line treatment receipt and changes in first line therapy use over calendar time. We also described overall survival (OS) and time to treatment failure (TTF) by first line treatment using the Kaplan-Meier method. For patterns of treatment sequence, we reported commonly observed treatment switch patterns by treatment sub-category and calendar year. The analyses included 584 patients (mean age = 76.3 years). A majority (n = 502) received first line immunotherapy. There was a sustained increase in immunotherapy uptake, most notably from 2015 to 2016. The estimated median OS and TTF were longer with first line immunotherapy than with targeted therapy. Individuals treated with CTLA-4 + PD-1 inhibitors had the longest median OS (28.4 months). The most common treatment switch pattern was from a first line CTLA-4 inhibitor to a second line PD-1 inhibitor. Our findings inform understanding of treatment patterns of currently used immunotherapies and targeted therapies in older adults with advanced melanoma. Immunotherapy use has increased steadily with PD-1 inhibitors becoming a dominant treatment option since 2015.