Background and Aims: For non-severe male factor infertility patients with poor and sub-optimal ovarian response, are there any differences in reproduction outcomes between IVF (in vitro fertilization) and ICSI (intracytoplasmic sperm injection) methods? Methods: Retrospective cohort study. Patients with non-severe male infertility and poor ovarian response who underwent in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection at the Center for Reproductive Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital between 2009 and 2019 were included in this study (n = 30,352). Results: In all groups, intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles involved older patients and a longer duration of infertility, while body mass index, AMH, and bFSH levels were similar. Independent of the number of oocytes retrieved, intracytoplasmic sperm injection significantly increased the fertilization rate, while in vitro fertilization cycles showed a higher implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and live birth rate. No differences were observed in most obstetric outcomes, including abortion, early abortion, multiple fetus, cesarean delivery, gestational age, and congenital malformations rates. However, in vitro fertilization cycles showed higher preterm delivery rates and lower birth weights in groups with 4-6, and 7-9 oocytes retrieved. A higher female/male infant ratio was observed in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles when 4-6 oocytes were retrieved. Conclusions: In patients with non-severe male infertility and poor or suboptimal ovarian response, even if intracytoplasmic sperm injection increased the fertilization rate, in vitro fertilization exhibited significant advantages in implantation, clinical pregnancy, and live birth rates. Our study indicates that poor ovarian response is not an indication for intracytoplasmic sperm injection in couples with non-severe male infertility.