Long-term Progression-free Survival Research Articles

Second Chance for Cure: Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy in Oligometastatic Disease.

Local ablative therapy, such as radiotherapy or surgery, plays a key role in treatment of patients with oligometastatic disease. Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) comes to the fore as a safe and effective treatment for patients with a limited number of metastases, even those located in hard-to-reach body sites. Many researchers have suggested that metastatsis-directed therapy could improve long-term progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with oligometastases. This was a retrospective, single-arm, observational study conducted between July 2015 and February 2022. In our institute, 60 patients with controlled primary tumors and one to five metastases were treated with SABR. Prescribed radiation doses ranged from 12 to 60 Gy administered in one to seven fractions. We aimed to determine whether metastatic-directed therapy using SABR for all oligometastases affects OS and PFS and whether the primary tumor or metastatic site influences OS/PFS. The most common primary malignancy types were prostate (n = 14), colorectal (n = 10), lung (n = 7), and breast cancers (n = 6). The median follow-up was 30 months, ranging from 9 to 79. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year PFS and OS rates were 54.9%, 37.0%, and 37.0% and 98.3%, 84.4%, and 73.8%, respectively, and the median time to first progression was 15 (range, 2-32) months. Twenty-four (40%) patients had no recurrence. In our analysis, primary tumor site was not an independent prognostic factor. The metastatic site may influence on patient outcome in cases of localized bone and liver metastases. In our retrospective analysis, SABR was associated with favorable levels of PFS and OS in patients with oligometastases. The limitations of our study were lacking high-level evidence, and randomized studies to compare SABR and palliative standard of care are mandatory.

Predictive Factors of Long-Term Neurologic Outcome and Progression-Free Survival in Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumors: A 10-year Single-Center Cohort Study and Review of the Literature

Intramedullary spinal cord tumors (IMSCTs) are a rare subgroup of neoplasms, encompassing both benign, slow-growing masses, and malignant lesions; radical surgical excision represents the cornerstone of treatment for such pathologies regardless of histopathology, which, on the other hand, is a known predictor of survival and neurologic outcome postsurgery. The present study aims to investigate the relevance of other factors in predicting survival and long-term functional outcomes. We conducted a review of current literature on functional outcomes of IMSCTs, as well as a 10-years prospective analysis of a wide cohort of patients with diagnosis of IMSCTs who underwent surgical resection at our institution. Our series encompasses 60 patients with IMSCTS, among which 36 ependymomas, 6 cavernous angiomas, 5 hemangioblastomas, 6 WHO Grade I-IV astrocytomas, 3 intramedullary spinal metastases and 4 miscellaneous tumors. GTR was achieved in 76,67% of patients, with high preoperative McCormick grade, syringomyelia and changes at neurophysiologic monitoring being the strongest predictors at multivariate analysis (P= 0.0027, P= 0.0017 and P= 0.001 respectively). Consistently with literature, preoperative neurologic function is the most important factor predicting long-term functional outcome (0.17, CI 0.069-0.57 with P= 0.0018), advocating for early surgery in the management of IMSCTs, whereas late complications such as myelopathy and neuropathic pain were present regardless of preoperative function.

Squamous cell carcinoma of the anus successfully treated with multidisciplinary therapy for metachronous metastatic and local recurrences after DCF chemotherapy: a case report

BackgroundDocetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) chemotherapy is reportedly an effective treatment strategy for squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA). However, studies regarding its use in Japanese patients remain scarce.Case presentationHere, we present the case of an 82-year-old woman with SCCA, cStage IIIB. Chemoradiotherapy was initiated after colostomy of the anorectal mass; however, para-aortic lymph node recurrence was observed 3 months after treatment completion. Five courses of DCF chemotherapy were subsequently administered, resulting in a complete response (CR). Two years and 1 month later, the aortic lymph node was enlarged again, and the patient achieved CR again after radiotherapy. Nine months later, local recurrence was detected in the anal canal, and laparoscopic perineal rectal amputation was performed. The patient remains progression-free 5 years and 10 months after the initial treatment and 1 year and 7 months after the final treatment.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that complementary treatment after DCF chemotherapy may be efficacious in Japanese patients with SCCA and help achieve CR. Despite occasional local recurrences, this approach may help achieve long-term progression-free survival.

Treatment outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with driver mutant non-small cell lung cancer and de novo brain metastases

Central nervous system (CNS) metastases can be seen at a rate of 30% in advanced stages for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Growing evidence indicates the predictive roles of driver gene mutations in the development of brain metastases (BM) in recent years, meaning that oncogene-driven NSCLC have a high incidence of BM at diagnosis. Today, 3rd generation targeted drugs with high intracranial efficacy, which can cross the blood–brain barrier, have made a positive contribution to survival for these patients with an increased propensity to BM. It is important to update the clinical and pathological factors reflected in the survival with real-life data. A multi-center, retrospective database of 306 patients diagnosed with driver mutant NSCLC and initially presented with BM between between November 2008 and September 2022 were analyzed. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 12.25 months (95% CI, 10–14.5). While 254 of the patients received tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), 51 patients received chemotherapy as first line treatment. The median intracranial PFS (iPFS) was 18.5 months (95% CI, 14.8–22.2). The median overall survival (OS) was 29 months (95% CI, 25.2–33.0). It was found that having 3 or less BM and absence of extracranial metastases were significantly associated with better mOS and iPFS. The relationship between the size of BM and survival was found to be non-significant. Among patients with advanced NSCLC with de novo BM carrying a driver mutation, long-term progression-free and overall survival can be achieved with the advent of targeted agents with high CNS efficacy with more conservative and localized radiotherapy modalities.

Increased PD-1 Expression on Circulating T Cells Correlates with Inferior Outcome after Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) is a well-established treatment option for multiple myeloma and malignant lymphoma patients. It is able to induce long-term progression-free survival (PFS) in both patient groups and even provide a cure in patients with aggressive lymphoma. However, relapse is common and has been associated with the pace and quality of immunologic reconstitution after transplantation, as well as with immune cell exhaustion and immunometabolic defects. We aimed to analyze the dynamics of the prototypical exhaustion marker PD-1 on immune cells during reconstitution on high-dose chemotherapy followed by auto-SCT and its impact on PFS. We performed a comprehensive analysis of exhaustion and metabolic markers on immune cells from myeloma and lymphoma patients undergoing auto-SCT using flow cytometry and NanoString technologies. The expression levels of PD-1 were increased during early reconstitution after transplantation on T cells and natural killer (NK) cells, as well as on monocytes. However, while PD-1 expression in NK cells and monocytes normalized over time, PD-1 expression on T cells demonstrated a variable course. Of note, lymphoma patients with continuously increasing PD-1 expression on T cells after auto-SCT had an inferior median PFS of only 146 days, whereas the median PFS was not reached in the lymphoma patients without such a PD-1 expression pattern. T cells from patients with increased PD-1 expression after auto-SCT exhibited an immunometabolic (over)activation and exhausted phenotype compared to T cells from patients with a low PD-1 expression after transplantation, including higher levels of the glycolytic pacemaker enzyme hexokinase 2 and the inhibitory receptor CTLA-4. In addition, proliferating Ki-67+ T cells were more abundant in patients with high PD-1 expression on T cells compared to those with low expression after auto-SCT (11.9% versus 4.2%). PD-1 expression on T cells might serve as an adverse biomarker for lymphoma patients undergoing auto-SCT; however, further validation by larger prospective studies is required.

Alliance for clinical trials in Oncology (Alliance) trial A022101/NRG-GI009: a pragmatic randomized phase III trial evaluating total ablative therapy for patients with limited metastatic colorectal cancer: evaluating radiation, ablation, and surgery (ERASur)

BackgroundFor patients with liver-confined metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), local therapy of isolated metastases has been associated with long-term progression-free and overall survival (OS). However, for patients with more advanced mCRC, including those with extrahepatic disease, the efficacy of local therapy is less clear although increasingly being used in clinical practice. Prospective studies to clarify the role of metastatic-directed therapies in patients with mCRC are needed.MethodsThe Evaluating Radiation, Ablation, and Surgery (ERASur) A022101/NRG-GI009 trial is a randomized, National Cancer Institute-sponsored phase III study evaluating if the addition of metastatic-directed therapy to standard of care systemic therapy improves OS in patients with newly diagnosed limited mCRC. Eligible patients require a pathologic diagnosis of CRC, have BRAF wild-type and microsatellite stable disease, and have 4 or fewer sites of metastatic disease identified on baseline imaging. Liver-only metastatic disease is not permitted. All metastatic lesions must be amenable to total ablative therapy (TAT), which includes surgical resection, microwave ablation, and/or stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) with SABR required for at least one lesion. Patients without overt disease progression after 16–26 weeks of first-line systemic therapy will be randomized 1:1 to continuation of systemic therapy with or without TAT. The trial activated through the Cancer Trials Support Unit on January 10, 2023. The primary endpoint is OS. Secondary endpoints include event-free survival, adverse events profile, and time to local recurrence with exploratory biomarker analyses. This study requires a total of 346 evaluable patients to provide 80% power with a one-sided alpha of 0.05 to detect an improvement in OS from a median of 26 months in the control arm to 37 months in the experimental arm with a hazard ratio of 0.7. The trial uses a group sequential design with two interim analyses for futility.DiscussionThe ERASur trial employs a pragmatic interventional design to test the efficacy and safety of adding multimodality TAT to standard of care systemic therapy in patients with limited mCRC.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05673148, registered December 21, 2022.

The experience of relapsed Burkitt lymphoma treatment with targeted drugs and autologous/allogeneic stem cell transplantation

The use of high-effective, multicomponent, risk-adopted chemoimmunotherapy schemes in children with Burkitt lymphoma reached advanced long-term progression-free survival over 90 % even for high risk patients. Unfortunately, conventional therapeutic strategy for relapsed/refractory disease is not accepted, and the effectiveness of carboplat‑in- and gemcitabine-containing regimens is unsatisfactory. Clinical experience of rituximab, ibrutinib and nivolumab in combination with polychemotherapy and own clinical case of successful relapsed Burkitt lymphoma treatment with targeted therapy and following autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation are presented. Proposed program could achieve a complete remission of Burkitt lymphoma, but short-term after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation diagnosed T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia became fatal for the patient.

Long-Term Survival in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Tivozanib: Analysis of the Phase III TIVO-3 Trial.

Tivozanib is an oral vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with efficacy in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Long-term exploratory analyses from the TIVO-3 trial in relapsed/refractory (R/R) RCC including patients (26%) with prior immuno-oncology (IO) therapy are reported. Patients with R/R advanced RCC that progressed with 2 or 3 prior systemic therapies (≥1 VEGFR TKI) were randomized to tivozanib 1.5 mg QD or sorafenib 400 mg BID, stratified by IMDC risk and previous therapy. Safety, investigator-assessed long-term progression-free survival (LT-PFS), and serial overall survival (OS) were assessed. Mean time on treatment was 11.0 months with tivozanib (n = 175) and 6.3 months with sorafenib (n = 175). Fewer grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred with tivozanib (46%) than sorafenib (55%). Dose modification rates were lower with tivozanib than sorafenib across age/prior IO subgroups; prior IO therapy did not impact dose reductions or discontinuations in either arm. Landmark LT-PFS rates were higher with tivozanib (3 years: 12.3% vs 2.4%; 4 years: 7.6% vs 0%). After 22.8 months mean follow-up, the OS HR was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.70-1.14); when conditioned on 12-month landmark PFS, tivozanib showed significant OS improvement over sorafenib (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.22-0.91; 2-sided P = .0221). Tivozanib demonstrated a consistent safety profile and long-term survival benefit in patients with R/R advanced RCC who were alive and progression free at 12 months. These post hoc exploratory analyses of LT-PFS and conditional OS support a clinically meaningful improvement with tivozanib versus sorafenib in this advanced RCC population.

Alliance A022101: A pragmatic randomized phase III trial evaluating total ablative therapy for patients with limited metastatic colorectal cancer—Evaluating radiation, ablation, and surgery (ERASur).

TPS236 Background: For patients with oligometastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), aggressive local therapy of isolated metastases, particularly in the liver, has been associated with long-term progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) primarily based on retrospective evidence. However, in patients with limited metastatic CRC that is deemed inoperable or those with additional disease outside of the liver or lungs, the role of local ablative therapies, including microwave ablation (MWA) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), to render patients disease free is less clear. Further, despite the long history of treating oligometastatic CRC with local therapy, which is provider biased and not evidence based, questions remain regarding the benefit of extending the paradigm of metastatic directed therapy to patients with more extensive disease. This trial seeks to use a pragmatic multimodality approach that mirrors the current clinical dilemma. This study is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of adding total ablative therapy (TAT) of all sites of disease to standard of care systemic treatment in those with limited metastatic CRC. Methods: A022101 is a National Clinical Trials Network randomized phase III study planned to enroll 364 patients with newly diagnosed metastatic CRC (BRAF wild-type, microsatellite stable) with ≤4 sites of metastatic disease on baseline imaging. Liver-only metastatic disease is not permitted, and lesions must be amenable to any combination of surgical resection, MWA, and/or SBRT with SBRT required for at least one lesion. Patients receive first-line systemic therapy for 4-6 months and are then randomized 1:1, stratified by number of metastatic organ sites (1-2 vs. 3-4), timing of metastatic disease diagnosis (de novo vs. secondary), and presence of metastatic disease outside the liver and lungs in at least one site. Patients in Arm 1 will receive TAT which consists of treatment of all metastatic sites with SBRT ± MWA ± surgical resection followed by standard of care systemic therapy. Patients in Arm 2 will continue with standard of care systemic therapy alone. The primary endpoint is OS. Secondary endpoints include event-free survival, treatment-related toxicities, and local recurrence with exploratory biomarker analyses. The study needs 346 evaluable patients combined in the 2 arms to demonstrate an improvement in OS with a hazard ratio of 0.7 to provide 80% power with a one-sided alpha of 5%. The trial utilizes a group sequential design with two interim analyses (25% and 50% of events) for futility. The trial activated in January 2023 and recruitment is ongoing. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org. U10CA180820 (ECOG-ACRIN); U10CA180868 (NRG); U10CA180888 (SWOG). Clinical trial information: NCT05673148 .

Long-Term Results of a Phase 1 Dose Escalation Trial of Ablative Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is increasingly used for oligometastatic disease as well as palliation, but treatment protocols for non-spine bone and nodal metastases are lacking, with a wide variety of schedules applied. Therefore, a prospective dose-escalation trial was initiated, involving 90 patients, among whom 52 (58%) had primary prostate tumors, 13 had breast tumors (14%), and 25 (28%) had other primary tumor types. All visible lymph node and/or non-spine bone oligometastases were treated in three consecutive cohorts: 5×7.0 Gy, 3×10.0 Gy, or 1×20.0 Gy. Initial results revealed no dose-limiting toxicity after a median follow-up of 17.2 months. This update provides information on long-term toxicity, local failure (LF), and progression-free survival (PFS). After a median follow-up of 50 months, no new safety signals were observed. Grade 2 toxicity was 13%, 7% and 10% in the respective cohorts (p=0.9), without grade 3-5 toxicities. LF rates were 9%, 3%, and 6% (P=.5) for the respective treatment groups, with an overall cumulative risk of LF of 7% (95% CI 2-12) at 4 years. Median PFS was 16.5 months (95% CI 9.8-21.5), and 4-year PFS was 21% (95% CI 14-32). Median overall survival across groups was not reached (95% CI 52.8 – not reached), 4-year OS was 68% (95% CI 59-78). A subset of patients (23%) remained long-term disease-free, 37% had oligoprogressive disease at first recurrence and 40% developed polymetastatic relapse. In conclusion, the safe and effective use of dose-escalated single-fraction SBRT for bone and lymph node metastases is supported by this trial, especially considering patient-convenience and cost-effectiveness. Caution is needed when generalizing these outcomes beyond breast and prostate cancer, given their underrepresentation in our study.

Clinical Characteristics of Long-Term Survivors Treated with BCMA CAR T Cell

Introduction Anti-BCMA(B-cell maturation antigen) CAR-T therapy, a novel and efficacious method for treating relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), has been approved and applied in clinics. Here, we report the survival analysis and clinical characteristics associated with long-term survivors (complete response at 18 months) after CAR-T cell therapy. Methods Between 1 January 2018 and 1 February 2023, 22 consecutive patients with relapsed/refractory MM were enrolled in a clinical trial of BCMA CAR T cells (registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04500431). This study was approved by the Tongji Hospital of Tongji University Ethics Committee, and written informed consent was provided by each patient. They all were treated with a single infusion of CAR-T cells. FC chemotherapy regimen was administered before transfusion. The median number of CAR-T cells transfused was 5.0 (range 4.0-6.6) ×10 6/kg. Long-term efficacy and related clinical characteristics were evaluated. Results In the 22 patients treated, the overall response rate was 77% (17 of 22). With a median follow-up of 24 months (range, 4-52), the median PFS were 17 months. The adverse events within 30 days after infusion were well tolerated. Toxic hematologic effects were the most common grade ≥3 events, including neutropenia (68%), anemia (54%), and thrombocytopenia (36%).Only 1 patient experienced grade 1 neurologic toxicity.No patients experienced severe infection within 30 days after infusion. Detailed patient baseline characteristics are described in Tables 1. During follow-up after CAR T-cell therapy, the complete response rate was 36.3%(8/22), 40.9(9/22) and 27.2(6/22) at 12 months, 18 months and 24 months, respectively. At 18 months, the patients achieved the highest complete response rate. Baseline characteristics, such as age, sex, isotype, ECOG, high-risk cytogenetics, prior lines of therapy, percentage of plasma blasts in bone marrow, serum monoclonal protein and extramedullary disease in the 9 complete response patients at 18 months were similar to other progressive disease 13 patients. However, the significant differences of International Staging system stage(p=0.034) and Durie-Salm staging system(p=0.002) at baseline were observed between the 9 complete response patients and 13 progressive disease patients at 18 months(Table 1). The International Staging system stage(area under curve 0.80) and Durie-Salm staging system(area under curve 0.86) predicted the outcome of patients at 18 months well. Durie-Salmon Staging system was published in 1975, which used commonly available clinical parameters including calcium, hemoglobin, bone lesions, creatinine level and serum or urine monoclonal protein. The ISS staging system was proposed in 2005 based on baseline serum levels of beta2-microglobulin (β2M) and albumin. And there was no statistically significant difference in the baseline serum levels of beta2-microglobulin, albumin, calcium, bone lesions and creatinine level between the 9 complete response patients and 13 progressive disease patients at 18 months. As figure 1 illustrates, the hemoglobin of 9 complete response patients was higher than that of 13 progressive disease patients with statistical significance at 9 time-points: PreFC(117.6±20.7 vs 94.6±23.6 , p = 0.028), D -4(113.6±15.9 vs 86.0±25.7 , p = 0.016), D -3(107.8±11.8 vs 84.6±23.0 , p = 0.027), D -2(117.6±20.7 vs 94.6±23.6 , p = 0.0009), D -1(111.0±19.9 vs 81.8±19.0 , p = 0.013), D0(107.1±20.4 vs 83.0±22.8 , p = 0.029), D1(107.7±19.1 vs 84.2±24.3 , p = 0.032), D4(104.1±14.9 vs 82.7±19.9 , p = 0.015), D5(103.4±19.1 vs 82.2±18.3 , p = 0.018). In the univariate Cox regression analysis, the hemoglobin at PreFC(hazard ration (HR) = 0.97; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.95-1; p = 0.029), D -4(HR=0.96 ;95% CI:0.92-1, p = 0.012), D -3 (HR=0.97 ;95% CI:0.94-1, p = 0.029), D -2(HR=0.93 ;95% CI:0.89-1, p = 0.003), D -1(HR=0.97 ;95% CI:0.95-1, p = 0.047), D0(HR=0.97 ;95% CI:0.94-1, p = 0.038), D1(HR=0.97 ;95% CI:0.94-1, p = 0.044), D4(HR=0.95 ;95% CI:0.92-1, p = 0.01) and D5(HR=0.97 ;95% CI:0.94-1, p = 0.027) were relative factors of prognosis. Conclusions These long-term follow-up data in patients after BCMA CAR -T therapy suggest that baseline ISS ,DS staging and hemoglobin at 9 time-points display opposing association with long-term progression-free survival.

Real-World Outcomes Following Dose Modifications of First-Line Ibrutinib in Patients with Waldenström Macroglobulinemia

Background: In patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM), continuous once-daily ibrutinib-based therapy has been associated with long-term progression-free survival. In addition, patients who continued ibrutinib-based treatment had better survival outcomes than those who discontinued treatment within the first few years. Evidence based on a single-center retrospective study suggests that dose reduction (DR) can be used to effectively manage ibrutinib-related adverse events (AEs) and avoid early treatment discontinuation. However, real-world data on outcomes in patients with WM after ibrutinib DR are limited. In this real-world study, we analyzed short-term (1-year follow-up) dosing patterns and time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) in patients with WM, with and without DR, who were receiving first-line (1L) ibrutinib. Methods: Medicare Fee-for-Service closed-claim medical or pharmacy records were used to identify patients diagnosed with WM who initiated 1L single-agent ibrutinib (420 mg/day) from January 2014 to December 2020. Observed patients were enrolled in Medicare ≥12 months before and after ibrutinib initiation and had post-initiation AEs (both prevalent and incident AEs with DR recommendation from the US Prescribing Information), as identified via ICD-9 or ICD-10 codes. Ibrutinib DR was defined as a reduction of the starting dose following the first AE within the 1-year follow-up period. Patients without a DR were defined as those who had received ibrutinib 420 mg per day during the 1-year follow-up period. Patients with a DR in the absence of AEs and patients with a DR prior to any AE were excluded from the analysis. Demographics, clinical characteristics, time to first AE, and TTD were analyzed among cohorts with and without DR. TTD was defined and evaluated as the time from first observed AE after ibrutinib initiation to the earliest occurrence of (1) a gap of >120 days between the end of 1L therapy and the follow-up period, (2) initiation of a next line of therapy, or (3) death. TTD was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methodology, log rank test, and a Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for baseline and time-varying covariates. Results: We identified 404 patients (DR, n = 58 [14%]; no DR, 346 [86%]). Overall, 249 patients (62%) were men, 267 patients (66%) had hypertension, 55 patients (14%) had atrial fibrillation, and 114 patients (28%) had other cardiovascular conditions at baseline. The mean ± SD age at baseline was 77 ± 8 years. In both cohorts, the median Charlson Comorbidity Index was 4.0. Among the 404 patients, mean ± SD time from ibrutinib initiation to first AE was 28 ± 44 days. Mean ± SD time between first AE and DR was 137 ± 102 days. Mean TTD was 8.3 months (DR) and 6.2 (no DR) ( P = 0.018; Figure). At 6 and 12 months of follow-up, fewer patients with DR discontinued treatment compared with patients without DR (6 months: 24% vs 46%, P = 0.002; 12 months: 36% vs 50%, P = 0.064). After controlling for baseline and time-varying demographic and clinical characteristics, patients with DR were not significantly more likely to discontinue treatment compared with patients without DR (hazard ratio [95% CI], DR vs no DR: 1.24 [0.86-1.78]). Conclusion: These short-term (1-year follow-up) findings suggest TTD was not impacted by DR of ibrutinib following AEs. Thus, ibrutinib DR can be an effective strategy to manage AEs while maintaining clinical efficacy. Of note, causal association between AE and subsequent DR cannot be inferred from the claims database due to the cross-sectional nature of this study.

The Role of High-Dose Regimens Followed By Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Salvage Chemotherapy-Sensitive DLBCL Patients

CONCLUSION INTRODUCTION： It has been reported that lisocabtagene maraleucel improved event-free survival and complete response rate compared with standard care as second -line therapy for early relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (rrDLBCL) patients(pts). However, CAR T-cell therapy could not be available for some candidates with rrDLBCL due to socioeconomical issues and manufacturing limitations. High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) is a conventional curative treatment for salvage chemotherapy-sensitive DLBCL. We have devised AECC regimen (Usui, Clin Lymph; 2005, and Yano, Clin Lymph and Myeloma; 2007) for auto-SCT. Further, we have also used ranimustine (MCNU) based MEAM regimen due to not availability for carmustine in Japan. In this retrospective study, we compared the efficacy and safety of AECC with MEAM. METHODS： We retrospectively analyzed 68 pts with DLBCL who received AECC or MEAM followed by auto-SCT from January 2006 to December 2021 at the Jikei University Hospital and the Jikei University Kashiwa Hospital. AECC regimen consists of nimustine 200mg/m 2 on day -7 to day -6, etoposide (ETP) 30mg/kg on day -5 to day -4, cyclophosphamide 60mg/kg on day -3 to day -2, carboplatin 700mg/m 2 on day -3 to day -2. MEAM regimen consists of MCNU 300 mg/m 2 on day -7, ETP 200 mg/m 2 on day -6 to day -3, cytarabine 200 mg/m 2 q12 hrs on day -6 to day -3, and melphalan 140 mg/m 2 on day -2. In this study, early relapsed DLBCL (erDLBCL) was defined as DLBCL pts relapsed within 2 years from diagnosis. We retrospectively analyzed overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events (AE). Thirty-five pts received AECC and 33 pts MEAM in DLBCL, respectively. AECC was mainly used from 2006 to 2013, and MEAM was used from 2014 to 2021. The patient characteristics between AECC and MEAM were as bellows; the median follow-up time for survival was 109 (0-193) vs 35(1-83) months ( P <0.01), the median age at auto-SCT was 54(25-65) vs 58 (40-68) years ( P = 0.01), 66% vs 61% were male ( P = 0.80), the median years from diagnosis to auto-SCT was 1.43(0.39-12.79) vs 1.67(0.39-22.40) years ( P = 0.41), the number of pts who receive 2 lines of therapy before auto-SCT were 18 vs 23 ( P = 0.144). Disease status at auto-SCT in the AECC and MEAM groups were 16 vs 12 pts in complete response (CR), 15 vs 21 pts in partial response (PR), and 4 vs 0 pts in stable disease or progressive disease (SD/PD) ( P = 0.06). The 2-year OS and PFS rates in the AECC and MEAM groups were 76.9% vs 68.3% ( P =0.323), and 68.2% vs 59.4% ( P =0.137), respectively. In addition, we focused er DLBCL pts whose disease status at auto-SCT was CR or PR, named as “chemotherapy-sensitive er DLBCL”. Twenty-one pts were treated with AECC and 19 pts were received MEAM. The patient characteristics between AECC and MEAM were as bellows; the median age at auto-SCT in the AECC group was younger than those in the MEAM group (53(25-65) vs 60 (47-68) years, P = 0.01), the number of pts with CR in the AECC group was higher than those in the MEAM group. (10 vs 3, P = 0.046). The OS and PFS in the AECC group were significantly higher than those in the MEAM group (2-year OS 85.4% vs 48.5% ( P = 0.019), and 2-year PFS 75.6% vs 39.0% ( P <0.01), respectively). Additionally, AECC achieved long-term survival with 8-year OS and PFS of 80.4% and 75.6% in the chemotherapy-sensitive er DLBCL, respectively. At the time of data analysis, deaths had been reported in 12 of 35 pts in the AECC and 12 of 33 in the MEAM. The most common cause of death was disease progression (10 pts in the AECC and 8 in the MEAM). Non-relapse mortality (NRM) was observed in 2 pts of the AECC (drug-induced cardiomyopathy (n = 2)), and 4 of the MEAM (liver failure (n = 2), pneumonia (n = 1), and suicide (n = 1)). It should be mentioned that grade 3 or higher heart failure was observed in the AECC group (n = 8) compared to in the MEAM group (n = 0). Treatment related mortality (TRM) within 100 days was 2 pts in the AECC group due to cardiomyopathy and 0 in the MEAM group. AECC followed by auto-SCT achieved both long-term OS and PFS compared to MEAM in chemotherapy-sensitive er DLBCL pts. Further validation for efficacy is needed due to the differences in patient's background and follow-up period in the study. However, AECC was associated with a higher incidence of cardiac toxicity and TRM within 100 days. It was suggested that auto-SCT with AECC may be a treatment option when CAR T-cell therapy was not available.

Treatment with Daratumumab Plus Bortezomib, Cyclophosphamide, and Dexamethasone May Result in Both Hematologic and Metabolic Complete Response to Achieve Long-Term Progression Free Survival Among Patients Presenting with Extra-Medullary Disease: A European Myeloma Network Study (EMN19)

Introduction: Multiple myeloma (MM) with extramedullary disease (EMD) is an aggressive disease that requires innovative treatment strategies. Methods: The ongoing multinational, open-label phase 2 EMN19 trial (NCT04166565) enrolled patients (pts) with MM and EMD either as newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) or at first relapse (RMM). Pts received Daratumab (Dara) in combination with bortezomib (V), Cyclophosphamide (C), and Dexamethasone (D) (DaraVCD), either until disease progression or for a maximum of 36 months, along with autologous stem cell transplantation. Response to treatment was assessed using both the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) and the Impetus criteria for evaluating the EMD responses. Complete metabolic response (CMR) was defined as: Deauville scores 1, 2 or 3, with absence of FDG-avid bone marrow lesion(s), irrespective of a persistent mass on CT, or complete disappearance of EMD. Partial metabolic response as: Deauville score of 4 or 5 with decreased uptake compared to baseline and absence of structural progression development on CT or 50% reduction in EMD size. MRD assessment was performed locally at the time of CR or at an earlier time point, as per clinical practice. Pts without MRD assessment were included in the denominator when estimating the MRD(-) rate. Pts who had discontinued treatment by Cycle 4 were considered as non-responders (both in terms of hematologic and EMD response). Progression-Free Survival (PFS) was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analysis with Firth's correction was used for the estimation of the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: A cohort of 40 pts (73% NDMM; 28% RMM) was enrolled. The mean age was 58 years, with 22 (55%) of the pts being male. At baseline, 33 (83%) of the pts were in stage ≤II of the International Staging System and 6 (15%) were classified as high-risk according to FISH (t(4;14), t(14;16) and/or del17p). Among the pts, 22 (55%) had extramedullary plasmacytomas (PCTs), 14 (35%) had paraosseous involvement, and 4 (10%) had both. The median number of PCTs per pt was 2. At the cut-off date with a median follow-up (FU) of 23 months, 17 (43%) pts were still on treatment, while 23 (58%) had discontinued treatment mainly due to disease progression (13, 33%), inadequate response at the end of cycle 3 (5, 13%) or death (3, 8%). In the overall population, deepest responses were as follows: MRD(-) was achieved by 15 (38%) pts, ≥Complete response (CR) by 18 (45%) pts, ≥VGPR by 30 (75%) pts with an overall response rate (ORR) of 80% (32 pts). The median (range) time to MRD(-) was 19 months (4-33); 13 of the 15 MRD(-) pts were NDMM. Median PFS (24-months PFS rate) was 26 months (56%) in NDMM and 15 months (36%) in RMM. Overall, 28/40 (70%) pts had a concurrent hematologic and EMD response of partial response (PR) or better; the best hematologic responses achieved among those pts were: MRD(-) (15 pts), ≥CR (16 pts), VGPR (10 pts) and PR (2 pts). Additionally, 4/40 pts had a response of ≥PR (1 stringent CR, 1 CR and 2VGPR) without achieving an EMD response, while 8/40 pts had discontinued treatment by cycle 4 and did not have a hematologic or EMD response. The combinations of hematologic and EMD responses for 28 pts with concurrent hematologic and EMD response are shown in Figure 1. As seen in Figure 2, pts with concurrent hematologic CR (hemCR) and CMR had the best outcomes in terms of PFS, while having only one type of response (hematologic or EMD) was associated with inferior outcomes compared to having a response in and outside of marrow (p<0.001 overall and in NDMM). Overall, the respective HRs (95% CI) were: no response vs both types: 20.5 (3.5-119.8), p<0.001; one type vs both types: 8.3 (1.2-58.2), p=0.034. The median (range) time to first concurrent hemCR and CMR was 6 months (3-15); for pts achieving only one type of response (hemCR or CMR) the median (range) time to first response was 5 months (1-11). Conclusions: After a median FU of 23 months of DaraVCD treatment, 33% of the pts have achieved both deep hematological responses with MRD(-) and CMR resulting in a median PFS of 20 months. However, having only one type of response (hemCR or CMR) is associated with an inferior outcome. These results, in terms of response, are comparable to those found in the LYRA study in which NDMM EMD pts are treated using a similar DaraVCD protocol. Even in this high-risk population of unmet need, long-term deep responses can be achieved with DaraVCD in and outside of marrow.

PET4 Response As an Independent Predictor of Long-Term Outcomes in ECHELON2 (A+CHP Vs. CHOP) in CD30+PTCL

Background: Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) are uncommon, heterogeneous, and often aggressive subtypes of lymphoma characterized by a high risk of progression even after combination chemotherapy. The phase III, ECHELON-2 trial showed that the combination of brentuximab vedotin with chemotherapy (A+CHP) in patients (pts) with CD30-positive PTCLs improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to CHOP. In PTCL, positron emission tomography (PET) is a valuable way to assess disease burden and stage at the time of diagnosis and evaluate treatment response. Prior retrospective studies have shown that interim and end of treatment PET may predict outcomes; however, there are no prospective studies confirming their predictive value. In the ECHELON-2 study, PET4 outcomes were prospectively collected, and the objective of this exploratory analysis is to investigate the potential for interim PET scans to predict treatment response and long-term outcomes. Objective: To evaluate the role of interim 18F-FDG PET imaging (PET4) in predicting end of treatment (EOT) response, progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in pts (pts) with CD30+PTCL treated with A+CHP or CHOP in the ECHELON-2 trial. Methods: The ECHELON-2 trial included prospective 18F-FDG PET scans and assessment of treatment response including long-term PFS per investigator and OS. PET4 status was based on Deauville score by Independent Review Facility (IRF) assessment using scans at the cycle 4 response assessment. Deauville scores 1-3 are considered negative (PET4neg) and 4-5 positive (PET4pos). EOT response is the best response after completion of study treatment and prior to long term follow up per Cheson 2007 by IRF assessment. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate PFS and OS; p-values are based on stratified log-rank tests. All analyses are exploratory, and p-values are descriptive. Results: In this study, 452 pts were included, with 226 randomized to the A+CHP treatment arm and 226 to the CHOP treatment arm; median follow up was 66.8 months (range 0-90). Of randomized pts, 32 pts in the A+CHP arm and 41 pts in the CHOP arm were not evaluable for PET4. The overall results showed that the PET4neg evaluable subgroup had a higher proportion of pts achieving complete responses (CR) than PET4pos (80% vs. 9%) at EOT (Table 1). In pts assessed for PET4, pts who were PET4neg had improved PFS and OS in both the A+CHP and CHOP treatment arms (Figure 1). For A+CHP pts, those who achieved PET4neg had an improved PFS [HR 0.36, CI-95 (0.19-0.66), p=0.0006] and OS [HR 0.38, CI-95 (0.18-0.78), p=0.0060] compared to those who were PET4pos. Similarly, pts in the CHOP arm who achieved PET4neg had an improved PFS [HR 0.26, CI-95 (0.17-0.41), p<0.0001] and OS [HR 0.24, CI-95 (0.14-0.41), p< 0.0001] compared to those who were PET4pos. Among pts with anaplastic large cell lymphoma (sALCL) (n=316), 19 pts in the A+CHP arm and 32 in the CHOP arm were not evaluable for PET4. The results in this subgroup show that 128/143 (90%) A+CHP pts who had PET4 assessments achieved PET4neg. These pts experienced improved PFS [HR 0.28, CI-95 (0.14-0.60), p=0.0004] and OS [HR 0.38, CI-95 (0.16-0.94), p 0.0292] compared to PET4pos pts. For CHOP pts who had PET4 assessments 98/122 (80%), achieved PET4neg; these pts experienced improved PFS [HR 0.31, CI-95 (0.12-0.55), p<0.0001] and improved OS [HR 0.25, CI-95 (0.12-0.25), p= 0.0002] compared to PET4pos pts. Conclusion: In an exploratory analysis of interim PET imaging as part of the ECHELON-2 study, PET4neg by Deauville was associated with improved PFS and OS in both the A+CHP and CHOP arms. Our findings support the use of PET4 response in PTCL as a predictor of outcomes in both the A+CHP and CHOP pts. These findings emphasize the potential of PET scans to enhance risk stratification, individualize therapy decisions, and improve pt outcomes in the management of PTCLs. Further analysis will be presented at the meeting.

Early complete response as a validated surrogate marker in extranodal marginal zone lymphoma systemic therapy

AbstractExtranodal marginal zone lymphoma (EMZL) has a very indolent course, and the validation of surrogate markers could accelerate novel therapies. Although prognostic markers do exist, no surrogate markers have been validated in EMZL. We hypothesized that time to complete response within 24 months (TTCR24) and complete response (CR) at 24 months (CR24) could be valid surrogate markers of progression-free survival (PFS). The International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group 19 phase 3 trial showed the advantage of double therapy (rituximab + chlorambucil) over single therapy (rituximab or chlorambucil) on PFS. We used 2 recently published single-trial approaches to assess whether TTCR24 and CR24 were good surrogate markers of 8-year PFS (8y-PFS). Among the 401 patients, 264 (66%) reached a CR in the first 24 months, of which 222 (84%) remained in CR at month 24. The cumulative incidence of CR over time was significantly higher in patients under double therapy (hazard ratio, 1.75; P < .001). The double therapy arm was associated with a higher CR24 rate, a shorter TTCR24, and a longer 8y-PFS. The estimated proportion of treatment effect on 8y-PFS explained by TTCR24 was 95% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27-1.87). CR24 was also a strong surrogate marker because it mediated 90% (95% CI, 0.51-2.22) of the treatment effect on PFS and its natural indirect effect was significant throughout the follow-up. We found that TTCR24 predicted 95% and that CR24 mediated 90% of the treatment effect on long-term PFS. Therefore, TTCR24 and CR24 could be used in clinical trials as informative and valid early indicators of treatment effect on PFS. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00210353.

Cost-Effectiveness of Anti-BCMA Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Despite its promising outcomes, anti-BCMA chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy (CAR-T) is the most expensive myeloma treatment developed to date, and its cost-effectiveness is an important issue. This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of anti-BCMA CAR-T compared to standard antimyeloma therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. The model included myeloma patients in Japan and the United States who have received ≥3 prior lines of antimyeloma therapy, including immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies. A Markov model was constructed to compare the CAR-T strategy, in which patients receive either idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) or ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) followed by 3 lines of multiagent chemotherapy after relapse, and the no CAR-T strategy, in which patients receive only chemotherapy. Data from the LocoMMotion, KarMMa, and CARTITUDE-1 trials were extracted. Several assumptions were made regarding long-term progression-free survival (PFS) with CAR-T. Extensive scenario analyses were made regarding regimens for no CAR-T strategies. The outcome was an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) with willingness-to-pay thresholds of ¥7,500,000 in Japan and $150,000 in the United States. When a 5-year PFS of 40% with cilta-cel was assumed, the ICER of the CAR-T strategy versus the no CAR-T strategy was ¥7,603,823 per QALY in Japan and $112,191 per QALY in the United States over a 10-year time horizon. When a 5-year PFS of 15% with ide-cel was assumed, the ICER was ¥20,388,711 per QALY in Japan and $261,678 per QALY in the United States over a 10-year time horizon. The results were highly dependent on the PFS assumption with CAR-T and were robust to changes in most other parameters and scenarios. Although anti-BCMA CAR-T can be cost-effective even under current pricing, a high long-term PFS is necessary.

Pretreatment MR-based radiomics in patients with glioblastoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic endpoints

PurposeRecent studies have shown promise of MR-based radiomics in predicting the survival of patients with untreated glioblastoma. This study aimed to comprehensively collate evidence to assess the prognostic value of radiomics in glioblastoma. MethodsPubMed-MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science were searched to find original articles investigating the prognostic value of MR-based radiomics in glioblastoma published up to July 14, 2023. Concordance indexes (C-indexes) and Cox proportional hazards ratios (HRs) of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were pooled via random-effects modeling. For studies aimed at classifying long-term and short-term PFS, a hierarchical regression model was used to calculate pooled sensitivity and specificity. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed using the Higgin inconsistency index (I2). Subgroup regression analysis was performed to find potential factors contributing to heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed via funnel plots and the Egger test. ResultsAmong 1371 abstracts, 18 and 17 studies were included for qualitative and quantitative data synthesis, respectively. Respective pooled C-indexes and HRs for OS were 0.65 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.58–0.72) and 2.88 (95 % CI, 2.28–3.64), whereas those for PFS were 0.61 (95 % CI, 0.55–0.66) and 2.78 (95 % CI, 1.91–4.03). Among 4 studies that predicted short-term PFS, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.77 (95 % CI, 0.58–0.89) and 0.60 (95 % CI, 0.45–0.73), respectively. There was a substantial between-study heterogeneity among studies with the survival endpoint of OS C-index (n = 9, I2 = 83.8 %). Publication bias was not observed overall. ConclusionPretreatment MR-based radiomics provided modest prognostic value in both OS and PFS in patients with glioblastoma.

Alliance A022101: A Pragmatic Randomized Phase III Trial Evaluating Total Ablative Therapy for Patients with Limited Metastatic Colorectal Cancer – Evaluating Radiation, Ablation and Surgery (ERASur)

For patients with oligometastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), aggressive local therapy of isolated metastases, particularly in the liver, has been associated with long-term progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) primarily based on retrospective evidence. However, in patients with limited metastatic CRC that is deemed inoperable or those with additional disease outside of the liver or lungs, the role of local ablative therapies, including microwave ablation (MWA) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), to render patients disease free is less clear. Further, despite the long history of treating oligometastatic CRC with local therapy, which is provider biased and not evidence based, questions remain regarding the benefit of extending the paradigm of metastatic directed therapy to patients with more extensive disease. This trial seeks to use a pragmatic multimodality approach that mirrors the current clinical dilemma. This study is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of adding total ablative therapy (TAT) of all sites of disease to standard of care systemic treatment in those with limited metastatic CRC. A022101 is a National Clinical Trials Network randomized phase III study planned to enroll 364 patients with newly diagnosed metastatic CRC (BRAF wild-type, microsatellite stable) with 4 or fewer sites of metastatic disease on baseline imaging. Liver-only metastatic disease is not permitted, and lesions must be amenable to any combination of surgical resection, MWA, and/or SBRT with SBRT required for at least one lesion. Patients receive first-line systemic therapy for 4-6 months and are then randomized 1:1, stratified by number of metastatic organ sites (1-2 vs. 3-4), timing of metastatic disease diagnosis (de novo vs. secondary), and presence of metastatic disease outside the liver and lungs in at least one site. Patients in Arm 1 will receive TAT which consists of treatment of all metastatic sites with SBRT ± MWA ± surgical resection followed by standard of care systemic therapy. Patients in Arm 2 will continue with standard of care systemic therapy alone. The primary endpoint is OS. Secondary endpoints include event-free survival, treatment-related toxicities, and local recurrence with exploratory biomarker analyses. The study needs 346 evaluable patients combined in the 2 arms to demonstrate an improvement in OS with a hazard ratio of 0.7 to provide 80% power with a one-sided alpha of 5%. The trial utilizes a group sequential design with two interim analyses (25% and 50% of events) for futility. The trial activated in January 2023. Recruitment is ongoing.

Comparison of statistical methods for extrapolating survival in previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: results based on the POLARIX study

Objective The ongoing Phase III randomized POLARIX study (GO39942; NCT03274492) demonstrated significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) with polatuzumab vedotin plus rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and prednisone (Pola-R-CHP) versus rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) in patients with previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). We compared statistical methodologies to extrapolate long-term PFS data from POLARIX.Materials and methods This analysis explored four different approaches to extrapolate the POLARIX data: standard parametric survival, mixture-cure, landmark, and spline models. The resulting extrapolation curves were validated via comparison with the corresponding Kaplan–Meier (KM) curves from POLARIX and the POLARIX-like population of the Phase III GOYA study (NCT01287741; R-CHOP arm).Results The R-CHOP PFS KM curve from the GOYA validation set was well aligned with the POLARIX KM curve. As we anticipated that PFS in POLARIX would evolve similarly to that of GOYA, the data from GOYA were used to externally validate the extrapolated modelling results. While all four statistical methods were able to fit the data to the POLARIX KM curve, the mixture-cure model was the most accurate in predicting long-term PFS in the GOYA external validation set. In the mixture-cure model, generalized gamma distribution estimated 64% (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 56–71%) of patients to have long-term remission in the R-CHOP arm of POLARIX and GOYA, and 75% (95% CI: 70–79%) in the Pola-R-CHP arm of POLARIX. A limitation of this study was the comparison of the statistical models only in the PFS KM curves, since it was not possible to determine which statistical method was more appropriate to extrapolate the overall survival KM curves.Conclusions Within this analysis, the mixture-cure model provided the best prediction of long-term outcomes from the primary PFS analysis of the POLARIX study.