Long-term Oral Anticoagulant Treatment Research Articles

A Retrospective Study of Perioperative Nursing Care of Patients After Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion

PurposeTo describe the retrospective audit examining nursing care of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation treated by percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (PLAAC). DesignPLAAC is a new technique for patients with atrial fibrillation unsuited for long-term oral anticoagulation treatment. The nursing care for patients treated by PLAAC has not yet been standardized. MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of 259 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who underwent PLAAC in our department between August 2014 and June 2018. The data included preoperative evaluations, discussions, and preparations, including psychological care and atrial thrombosis screening; postoperative observations, including electrocardiograph monitoring; prevention and care of complications; administration of postoperative anticoagulation therapy; and postoperative education, including detailed discharge guidance and regular follow-up. FindingsAll patients were discharged after 5-10 days of hospitalization. In the perioperative period, 4 cases (1.5%) developed serious complications, including 3 cases (1.2%) of delayed cardiac tamponade, cured by pericardial drainage, and 1 case of a suspected air embolism, which spontaneously recovered. During a mean follow-up period of 25.9 ± 7.9 months, all patients had good adherence to medical instructions and there were no cases of occluder displacement or shedding, thromboembolism, or severe bleeding complications. ConclusionsThe best therapeutic effect of PLAAC is strongly associated with the preoperative and postoperative training of nursing staff and the development of standard nursing procedures, including the establishment of observation and nursing manuals for complications. This study provides nursing practice information to aid in the standardization of nursing procedures for this new type of interventional therapy.

Prehospital management of acute coronary syndrome in patients on long-term direct oral anticoagulant treatment

Despite an increasing incidence of patients suffering from acute coronary syndrome (ACS) under simultaneous treatment with direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC), neither sufficient scientific data nor uniform guidelines for the anticoagulation treatment of these patients are currently available. The aim of this study was to determine the current practice of preclinical treatment of ACS in patients under DOAC treatment. An internet and paper-based survey of emergency physicians, specialists of internal medicine, anesthesiologists, emergency and intensive care physicians was performed concerning the prehospital treatment of ACS in patients under long-term DOAC treatment. Overall, 284 questionnaires were answered. Substantial differences in the current treatment of ACS under long-term DOAC therapy were identified. While 39% of the respondents stated that they administer a combination treatment of heparin and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), 36% renounced the administration of heparin. If a dose reduction was performed, 71% answered that they reduce the heparin dosage. Also, in cases of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction 48% of the physicians renounced the administration of heparin. In Germany there is currently aheterogeneous practice of emergency treatment of ACS patients under DOAC therapy with respect to the administration of heparin and ASA. Therefore, guidelines of the specialist medical societies should address the prehospital emergency anticoagulation management of ACS in patients under therapy with DOAC, which correspond to the needs of patients and emergency physicians.

Direct Anticoagulants and Risk of Myocardial Infarction, a Multiple Treatment Network Meta-Analysis.

We assessed the cardiovascular safety of long-term direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) treatment. A search of the medical literature was performed from inception until May 31, 2019. Inclusion criteria were (1) randomized trial that assessed the clinical efficacy and/or safety of 1 or more DOAC, (2) control group including oral anticoagulation and/or antiplatelet and/or placebo treatment, and (3) the incidence of acute coronary syndrome during follow-up was reported. Fixed-effect and random-effects models were applied. The analyzed outcomes were myocardial infarction (MI), major bleeding, and mortality. Twenty-eight randomized clinical trials (196 761 patients) were included. Rivaroxaban was associated with a 21% reduction in the relative risk of MI when compared to placebo (relative risk [RR]: 0.79 [95% credible interval, CrI: 0.65-0.94]) and a 31% reduction (RR: 0.70 [95% CrI: 0.53-0.89]) when compared to dabigatran. Apixaban resulted in 24% (RR: 0.76 [95% CrI: 0.58-0.99]) and vitamin K antagonists anticoagulation resulted in 19% (RR: 0.81 [95% CrI: 0.65-0.98]) risk reduction compared to dabigatran. The computed probability of being the first best choice of treatment was 61.8% for rivaroxaban. Cardiovascular safety shows considerable heterogeneity among oral anticoagulants. Treatment with rivaroxaban is associated with reduced rate of MI.

Brain microbleeds, anticoagulation, and hemorrhage risk

To assess the association between cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) and future spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) risk in ischemic stroke patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) taking oral anticoagulants. This was a meta-analysis of cohort studies with >50 patients with recent ischemic stroke and documented AF, brain MRI at baseline, long-term oral anticoagulation treatment, and ≥6 months of follow-up. Authors provided summary-level data on stroke outcomes stratified by CMB status. We estimated pooled annualized ICH and ischemic stroke rates from Poisson regression. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) of ICH by CMB presence/absence, ≥5 CMBs, and CMB topography (strictly lobar, mixed, and strictly deep) using random-effects models. We established an international collaboration and pooled data from 8 centers including 1,552 patients. The crude CMB prevalence was 30% and 7% for ≥5 CMBs. Baseline CMB presence (vs no CMB) was associated with ICH during follow-up (OR 2.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19-6.01, p = 0.017). Presence of ≥5 CMB was related to higher future ICH risk (OR 5.50, 95% CI 2.07-14.66, p = 0.001). The pooled annual ICH incidence increased from 0.30% (95% CI 0.04-0.55) among CMB-negative patients to 0.81% (95% CI 0.17-1.45) in CMB-positive patients (p = 0.01) and 2.48% (95% CI 1.2-6.2) in patients with ≥5 CMBs (p = 0.001). There was no association between CMBs and recurrent ischemic stroke. The presence of CMB on MRI and the dichotomized cutoff of ≥5 CMBs might identify subgroups of ischemic stroke patients with AF with high ICH risk and after further validation could help in risk stratification, in anticoagulation decisions, and in guiding randomized trials and ongoing large observational studies.

Improvement of anticoagulant treatment using a dynamic decision support algorithm

Warfarin is the most widely prescribed vitamin K antagonist and in the United States and Europe more than 10 million people are currently in long-term oral anticoagulant treatment. This study aims to retrospectively validate a dynamic statistical model providing dosage suggestions to patients in warfarin treatment. The model was validated on a cohort of 553 patients with a mean TTR of 83%. Patients in the cohort were self-monitoring and managed by a highly specialised anticoagulation clinic. The predictive model essentially consists of three parts handling INR history, warfarin dosage and biological noise, which allows for prediction of future INR values and optimal warfarin dose to stay on INR target. Further, the model is based on parameters initially being set to population values and gradually individualised during monitoring of patients. Time in therapeutic range was used as surrogate quality measure of the treatment, and model-suggested dosage of warfarin was used to assess the accuracy of the model performance. The accuracy of the model predictions measured as median absolute error was 0.53 mg/day (interquartile range from 0.25 to 1.0). The model performance was evaluated by the difference between observed and predicted warfarin intake in the preceding week of an INR measurement. In more than 70% of the cases where INR measurements were outside the therapeutic range, the model suggested a more reasonable dose than the observed intake. Applying the proposed dosing algorithm can potentially further increase the time in INR target range beyond 83%.

The Novel Oral Anticoagulants

After the introduction of warfarin, long-term oral anticoagulation treatment remained unchanged for more than 50 years. Most recently, with the development and approval of new oral anticoagulants, the treatment of medical conditions that require thrombosis prophylaxis and long-term anticoagulation has become more complex. In the case of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention after orthopedic surgery, the new oral agents will be less costly than the parenteral alternative. In other settings (such as atrial fibrillation or treatment of acute VTE), the new agents will offer additional convenience at higher cost, but the degree to which they will reduce clinically important events such as thrombosis or bleeding will be limited, especially for patients on optimally controlled warfarin. As the use of the new oral anticoagulants becomes more widespread, it will be important for all clinicians to have a basic understanding of their pharmacology, advantages, and limitations. Although the need to measure or reverse the effect of these drugs will arise infrequently, clinicians--especially hematologists--will desire evidence-based recommendations about how to manage such scenarios, which will require research studies.

GAPSS: the Global Anti-Phospholipid Syndrome Score

To develop and validate a risk score [global APS score (GAPSS)] derived from the combination of independent risk for thrombosis and pregnancy loss (PL), taking into account the aPL profile, conventional cardiovascular risk factors and the autoimmune antibody profile. This cross-sectional study included 211 consecutive SLE patients. Data on clinical manifestations, conventional cardiovascular risk factors, aPL profile, ANAs, ENA and anti-dsDNA were collected. Long-term low-dose aspirin, oral anticoagulant and HCQ treatment were also included in the analysis. Patients were randomly divided into two sets by a computer-generated randomized list. We developed GAPSS in the first set of patients (n = 106), assigning the risk factors identified by multivariate analysis weighted points proportional to the β-regression coefficient values. GAPSS was validated in the second set of patients (n = 105). The relationship between GAPPS and thrombosis and/or PL was analysed. In the first set, higher values of GAPSS were seen in patients who experienced thrombosis and/or PL compared with those without clinical events [GAPSS 9.3 (4.8) (range 1-19) and 5.3 (4) (range 0-16), P < 0.001]. Also taken separately, patients who experienced thrombosis or PL showed higher GAPSS compared with those without clinical events [GAPSS 9.6 (4.8) (range 1-19) vs 4.9 (5) (range 0-14), P = 0.027 for thrombosis; 7.3 (5) vs 3.9 (5.1) (range 0-16), P = 0.024 for PL, respectively]. In the second set, the results were similar, with statistically higher values of GAPSS in patients with a clinical history of thrombosis and/or PL compared with those without events [GAPSS 9.5 (5.6) (range 0-20) and 3.9 (4.1) (range 0-17), P < 0.001). Higher values were also seen when subclassifying the patients according to the clinical manifestation, thrombosis or PL [GAPSS 9.5 (5.6) (range 0-20) vs 4.8 (5.4) (range 0-17), P = 0.036 for thrombosis; 7.9 (3.3) vs 3.8 (5.4) (range 0-16), P = 0.037 for PL, respectively). These data propose a substantial improvement in risk prediction of thrombosis or PL in SLE based on assessment of the GAPSS, a quantitative scoring system.

Intramural hematomas of the gastrointestinal system: a 5-year single center experience

PurposeAlthough spontaneous intramural hematomas of the gastrointestinal tract are very rare, they may be observed with the use of oral anticoagulant, though less frequently in cases of hematological malignancy and other bleeding disorders. Cases diagnosed as spontaneous intramural hematoma have been assessed in our clinic.MethodsThe cases, which were diagnosed as spontaneous intramural hematoma in the gastrointestinal tract (SIHGT) following anamnesis, physical examination, biochemical, radiological and endoscopic findings from July 2008 to July 2012, have been assessed retrospectively.ResultsSeven out of 13 cases were women and the mean age was 65.1 years (34 to 82 years). The most frequent complaint on admission was abdominal pain. The most frequent location of SIHGT was the ileum (n = 8). Oral anticoagulant use was the most common cause of etiology (n = 12). In 10 cases, International normalized ratio values were higher than treatment range (2 to 3, where mechanical valve replacement was 2.5 to 3.5) and mean value was 7.6 (1.70 to 23.13). While 12 cases were discharged without problems with medical treatment, one case with acute myeloid leukemia died in the intensive care unit following cerebrovascular attack.ConclusionSpontaneus bleeding and hematomas that may arise in connection with bleeding diathesis may be fatal in cases with long-term oral anticoagulant treatment and insufficient follow-up. In management of these cases, it may be necessary to arrange conservative follow up and/or initialize low molecular weight heparin, and administer vitamin K as well as replace blood products and coagulation factors when indicated.

Polish guidelines for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism. 2012 update

The overall objective of the Polish guidelines for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism is to increase patient benefit and safety by appropriate prevention and treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism as well as proper management of the complications associated with antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy. These guidelines apply to adult trauma, cancer, surgical, and medical patients as well as those at increased risk of venous thromboembolism. Specific recommendations have been formulated for pregnant women, patients requiring surgery while receiving long-term oral anticoagulant treatment, and patients undergoing regional anesthesia and/or analgesia. We chose to update the existing Polish guidelines with the use of the most recent high-quality international guidelines that we identified and adjusted the final product to Polish cultural and organizational setting. We based our recommendations primarily on the 9th edition of the American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines on Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, the European Society of Cardiology Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism, the 3rd edition of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Evidence-Based Guidelines on Regional Anesthesia in the Patient Receiving Antithrombotic or Thrombolytic Therapy, the ACOG practice bulletin on thromboembolism in pregnancy (Number 123), and Guidance from the Scientific and Standardisation Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis on the Duration of Anticoagulant Therapy after a First Episode of Unprovoked Pulmonary Embolus or Deep Vein Thrombosis, as well as two other Polish practice guidelines on the prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism and the management of patients treated with oral direct inhibitors of factor X or factor II. To make recommendations regarding specific management issues that had not been addressed in other guidelines, or whenever the panel members felt they needed additional information to reach the decision, we also consulted the authors of guidelines developed by other professional societies and organizations as well as additional sources of evidence. For each adapted recommendation, we explicitly assessed its relevance and applicability in the context of the healthcare system in Poland. When necessary, we explicitly stated the rationale for modification of the previously published recommendations and judgements about the values and preferences we assumed. The information regarding reimbursement of drugs mentioned in the recommendations was added in chapters 6-9 and 13 and approved by the National Health Fund. The final version of the practice guidelines was officially approved by the scientific societies and institutions listed at the beginning of the document.

“Triple Therapy” Rather Than “Triple Threat”: A Meta-analysis of the Two Antithrombotic Regimens After Stent Implantation in Patients Receiving Long-term Oral Anticoagulant Treatment

An increasing number of patients with an indication for long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC) have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation (PCI-s). However, the optimal antithrombotic treatment for these patients is currently unknown. The purpose of this study was to characterize the benefits and risks of triple antithrombotic therapy (combined aspirin, clopidogrel, and OAC) after stent implantation in patients under long-term OAC treatment compared with dual antiplatelet therapy (combined aspirin and clopidogrel). The study consisted of clinical controlled trials with ≥ 3 months of follow-up that compared triple antithrombotic therapy with dual antiplatelet therapy after stent implantation in patients undergoing long-term OAC treatment. Nine clinical trials included 1,996 participants. The meta-analysis was feasible because the grouping criterion was similar. The meta-analysis of the prevention of a major adverse cardiovascular event shows triple antithrombotic therapy to be more efficacious than dual antiplatelet therapy (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.42-0.86; P = .005). There was a significant reduction in all-cause mortality with triple antithrombotic therapy compared with dual antiplatelet therapy. The meta-analysis of major bleeding in the first 6 months during follow-up shows significantly more events with triple antithrombotic therapy (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.05-4.29; P = .04). Based on our analysis, triple antithrombotic therapy is substantially more efficacious in reducing the occurrence of cardiovascular events and mortality in PCI-s patients with an indication for long-term OAC, compared with dual antiplatelet therapy. Although triple therapy predisposes patients to an increased risk of bleeding, especially major bleeding, it is the better choice for patients with a low bleeding risk.

Polish guidelines for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism 2009 update

The overall objective of the Polish guidelines for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism is to increase patient benefit and safety by appropriate prevention and treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism as well as proper management of the complications associated with antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy. These guidelines apply to adult trauma, cancer, surgical, and medical patients as well as those at increased risk of venous thromboembolism. Specific recommendations have been formulated for pregnant women, patients requiring surgery while receiving long-term oral anticoagulant treatment, and patients undergoing regional anesthesia and/or analgesia. We systematically identified all current clinical practice guidelines concerning the prevention and/or treatment of venous thromboembolism and assessed their methodological quality using the AGREE instrument. We chose to update existing Polish guidelines by adapting the most recent high quality guidelines that we identified to Polish cultural and organizational setting rather than develop all recommendations de novo. We based our recommendations primarily on the 8th edition of the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy and on the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism. To make recommendations regarding specific management issues that had not been addressed in ACCP guidelines, or whenever panel members felt they needed additional information to reach the decision we also consulted guidelines developed by other professional societies and organizations as well as additional sources of evidence. For each recommendation we explicitly assessed its relevance and applicability in the context of health care system in Poland. We adapted recommendations when necessary, explicitly stating the rationale for modification and judgements about the values and preferences we assumed. We developed original recommendations on the use of new oral anticoagulants that have recently become available, following the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

Design and rationale of the WOEST trial: What is the Optimal antiplatElet and anticoagulant therapy in patients with oral anticoagulation and coronary StenTing (WOEST)

Long-term oral anticoagulant treatment is obligatory in patients (class I) with mechanical heart valves and most patients with atrial fibrillation. When these patients undergo percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting, there is also an indication for treatment with aspirin and clopidogrel. However, triple therapy is known to increase the risk of bleeding complications. Unfortunately, there are no prospective data available to resolve this issue. Nevertheless, it all comes down to finding the ideal therapy in patients with indications of both chronic anticoagulation therapy and percutaneous intervention to prevent thrombotic complications (eg, stent thrombosis) without increasing the risk of bleeding. This prospective randomized multicenter study will assess the hypothesis that after percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation in patients on oral anticoagulant therapy, the combination of oral anticoagulation therapy and clopidogrel 75 mg/d reduces the risk of bleeding and is not inferior to triple therapy treatment with respect to the prevention of thrombotic complications. Multicenter, international, open-label randomized trial evaluating triple therapy (clopidogrel + oral anticoagulants + aspirin) in patients with an indication for oral anticoagulants who undergo coronary stenting versus the combination of oral anticoagulants and clopidogrel. The primary outcome is the combination of TIMI and GUSTO minor and major bleeding up to 30 days and 1 year. The secondary outcomes are major adverse cardiac events. The sample size is 496. No prospective randomized study has yet addressed the issue of optimal antiplatelet therapy in patients with chronic oral anticoagulant therapy undergoing coronary stenting. Therefore, the WOEST trial will help to define new guidelines for patients with indication for chronic anticoagulation who need coronary stenting.

Abstract 4270: Comprehensive Meta-Analysis on Oral Anticoagulants for the Secondary Prevention of Coronary Artery Disease Including more than 50,000 Patients

Recurrent events remain frequent among patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Several trials have appraised the role of oral anticoaugulants in the secondary prevention of CAD, but with inconclusive results. We thus aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of long-term oral anticoagulant treatment in patients with CAD. Potentially eligible studies were searched systematically. The primary end-point was the occurrence of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. In addition, we appraised individual components of the primary end-point, as well as the risk of major and minor bleedings. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals were computed according to fixed/random effect methods. A total of 61 randomized controlled trials were retrieved, including 57,983 patients. After a median follow-up of 12 months, oral anticoagulants significantly reduced the risk of death, myocardial infarction or stroke in comparison to control therapy (OR=0.74 [0.65– 0.83], p&lt;0.001), as well as death from all causes (p&lt;0.001), myocardial infarction (p&lt;0.001), and stroke (p&lt;0.001), despite an increase in major (p&lt;0.001) and minor bleedings (p&lt;0.001). Stratification for control therapy showed that benefits were maintained when anticoagulants were compared to placebo or standard therapy without any antithrombotic medication (p0.05), despite significant increases in bleeding rates (p&lt;0.001), whereas significant benefits in terms of reduction of stroke risk occurred when comparing oral anticoagulants versus oral antiplatelet agents alone (p&lt;0.001). Specifically, an International Normalized Ratio (INR) between 2.0 and 3.0 appear critical to minimize bleeding risk and maximize antithrombotic effects. Oral anticoagulants significantly prevent adverse events in patients with established CAD in comparison to standard therapy without any antithrombotic medication. Comparisons of oral antiplatelet agents versus oral anticoagulants alone or oral anticoagulants plus oral antiplatelet agents showed conversely that oral anticoagulant therapy can achieve a favorable risk-benefit balance only in subjects without increased bleeding risk are selected and INR is maintained between 2.0 and 3.0.

EDUC’AVK: Reduction of Oral Anticoagulant-related Adverse Events After Patient Education: A Prospective Multicenter Open Randomized Study

Long-term oral anticoagulation treatment is associated with potential morbidity. Insufficient patient education is linked to poorly controlled anticoagulation. However the impact of a specific educational program on anticoagulation related morbidity remains unknown. To evaluate the effect of an oral anticoagulation patient education program in reducing both hemorrhagic and recurrent thrombotic complications. We conducted a prospective, multicenter open randomized study, comparing an interventional group who received a specific oral anticoagulation treatment educational program with a control group. Eligible patients were older than 18 and diagnosed as having deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism requiring therapy with a vitamin K antagonist for 3 months or more. Our primary outcome was the occurrence of hemorrhagic or thromboembolic events. During the 3-month follow-up the main outcome criteria were observed 20 times (6.6% of patients), 5 (3.1%) in the experimental and 15 (10.6%) in the control group. Consequently, in multivariate analysis, the cumulative risk reduction in the experimental group was statistically significant (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.1-0.7, p < 0.01). Patient education using an educational program reduced VKA-related adverse event rates.

Oral Anticoagulants Versus Antiplatelet Therapy for Preventing Stroke in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation and No History of Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attacks

Graeme J. Hankey MD, FRCP Section Editor: Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cardiac arrhythmia, affecting about 0.7% of the general population.1,2 Its prevalence increases with age; about 5% of people over age 65 years and 10% of people over the age of 80 years experience AF.1 Nonvalvular AF carries an increased risk of stroke mediated by embolism of stasis-precipitated thrombi originating in the left atrial appendage. Both oral anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents have proven effective for stroke prevention in many patients at high risk for vascular events (ie, for secondary prevention), but primary stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular AF potentially merits separate consideration because of the suspected cardioembolic mechanism of most strokes in AF patients. We set out to characterize the relative effect of long-term oral anticoagulant treatment compared with antiplatelet therapy on major vascular events in patients with nonvalvular AF and no history of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials …

Recurrent Venous Thrombosis in Patients with Polycythemia Vera and Essential Thrombocythemia

PurposeThe risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia has been scarcely addressed, and whether long-term oral anticoagulant treatment or acetylsalicylic acid should be recommended after first occurrence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is unknown. This multicenter cohort study was aimed to assess the rate of recurrent VTE in patients with polycythemia vera or essential thrombocythemia in comparison with a control group of individuals with previous VTE and without neoplastic diseases. Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively estimated the rate of recurrence in 79 patients with myeloproliferative disorders (MPDs; polycythemia vera/essential thrombocythemia, 45/34) and with a previous proximal DVT. Patients were divided into 2 groups. The first comprised 41 patients who received acetylsalicylic acid after 6 months of oral anticoagulant treatment. The second group was composed of 38 patients given long-term oral anticoagulant treatment without acetylsalicylic acid. The majority of patients were treated with cytotoxic drugs. The results were compared with the recurrences seen in 176 patients without cancer with previous proximal DVT given short-term oral anticoagulant treatment. ResultsIn the patients with polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia, the rate of recurrent DVT was higher in the group receiving acetylsalicylic acid (32%) compared with the group on oral anticoagulant treatment (16%), although not statistically significant. The rate of recurrent DVT in MPD cases receiving acetylsalicylic acid was quite similar to that of patients without cancer (33%). The cumulative probability of recurrent VTE indicated a trend of fewer events in the MPD cases on long-term oral anticoagulant treatment. In the patients with MPDs, the incidence of major bleeding during oral anticoagulant treatment or acetylsalicylic acid was 1% and 0.5% patient-years (years of observation), respectively. ConclusionThis retrospective analysis would suggest a long-term oral anticoagulant treatment after a first DVT in patients with polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia. However, this indication should be weighed against the risk of major hemorrhagic events that seems lower during long-term prophylaxis with acetylsalicylic acid. Therefore, a prospective clinical trial comparing acetylsalicylic acid in patients with polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia with oral anticoagulant treatment in the prevention of recurrent VTE is warranted.

Spring 2007 Meeting of the Association of British Clinical Diabetologists

Spring 2007 Meeting of the Association of British Clinical Diabetologists

Oral anticoagulants versus antiplatelet therapy for preventing stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and no history of stroke or transient ischemic attacks

Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) carries an increased risk of stroke mediated by embolism of stasis-precipitated thrombi originating in the left atrial appendage. Both oral anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents have proven effective for stroke prevention in most patients at high risk for vascular events, but primary stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular AF potentially merits separate consideration because of the suspected cardio-embolic mechanism of most strokes in AF patients. To characterize the relative effect of long-term oral anticoagulant treatment compared with antiplatelet therapy on major vascular events in patients with non-valvular AF and no history of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (June 2006). We also searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2006), MEDLINE (1966 to June 2006) and EMBASE (1980 to June 2006). We contacted the Atrial Fibrillation Collaboration and experts working in the field to identify unpublished and ongoing trials. All unconfounded, randomized trials in which long-term (more than four weeks) adjusted-dose oral anticoagulant treatment was compared with antiplatelet therapy in patients with chronic non-valvular AF. Two review authors independently selected trials for inclusion, assessed quality and extracted data. The Peto method was used for combining odds ratios after assessing for heterogeneity. Eight randomized trials, including 9598 patients, tested adjusted-dose warfarin versus aspirin (in dosages ranging from 75 to 325 mg/day) in AF patients without prior stroke or TIA. The mean overall follow up was 1.9 years/participant. Oral anticoagulants were associated with lower risk of all stroke (odds ratio (OR) 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54 to 0.85), ischemic stroke (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.68) and systemic emboli (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.90). All disabling or fatal strokes (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.04) and myocardial infarction (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.01) were substantially but not significantly reduced by oral anticoagulants. Vascular death (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.15) and all cause mortality (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.18), were similar with these treatments. Intracranial hemorrhages (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.20 to 3.28) were increased by oral anticoagulant therapy. Adjusted-dose warfarin and related oral anticoagulants reduce stroke, disabling stroke and other major vascular events for those with non-valvular AF by about one third when compared with antiplatelet therapy.

Recurrent intracardiac thrombosis as an unusual manifestation of inherited thrombophilia

Patients with inherited thrombophilia are at high risk for the development of venous thrombosis that manifests mainly as deep venous thrombosis of the legs and/or pulmonary embolism. We report spontaneous right-sided intracardiac thrombosis in a young man as an unusual manifestation of inherited thrombophilia. The diagnosis of thrombophilia was confirmed by demonstration of the prothrombin-G20210A-mutation in the homozygous state. A second spontaneous intracardiac thrombosis occurred 3 years after discontinuation of oral anticoagulant treatment. This indicates the high risk for recurrence in patients developing intracardiac thrombosis in the absence of an underlying cardiac disease and warrants long-term oral anticoagulant treatment.

Osteoporose bei Patienten unter oraler Antikoagulantien-Therapie

Osteoporosis is thought to be one possible side-effect of oral anticoagulant therapy, especially after long-term treatment. Nevertheless, data concerning this problem only exist from earlier years. Therefore, we decided to look for the incidence of osteoporosis in patients under long-term oral anticoagulant treatment. 30 patients (15 female, 15 male) - age between 38 and 77 years (average age 65,1+/-11,2 years) were examined. Group A: 10 patients with a capture time between 0,5 - 5 years, Group B: 10 patients with a capture time between 6 - 11 years, Group C: 10 patients with a capture time more than 11 years. The control group consisted 30 healthy persons - age between 39 and 81 years (18 female, 12 male, average age 61,5 +/- 12 years). In 21 out of 30 patients (9 female, 12 male) osteoporosis was found due to results of x-ray and bone-density-measurements. In 9 patients (6 female, 3 male) no osteoporosis was detected. No correlation between appearance of osteoporosis and duration of oral anticoagulant treatment was detected. Nevertheless, the number of patients presenting with osteoporosis in comparison with the control group was highly unexpected and astonishing. While treating patients with oral anticoagulants the possibility of appearing osteoporosis should be kept in view. In those circumstances the therapy should be supported by calcium and vitamin D.