Use Of Long-term Non-invasive Ventilation Research Articles

A Real-Life Study of Combined Treatment with Long-Term Non-Invasive Ventilation and High Flow Nasal Cannula in Patients with End-Stage Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease.

Patients with end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often develop persistent hypoxic or hypercapnic respiratory failure, or a combination of both. Ventilatory support, in terms of a long-term high-flow nasal cannula (LT-HFNC) and long-term non-invasive ventilation (LT-NIV), may be indicated. Often, clinicians choose either one or the other. This paper explores combined treatment with LT-HFNC and LT-NIV in a real-life setting. In total, 33 patients with COPD and persistent respiratory failure were included in this study. Of those, 17 were initiated on LT-HFNC and used it for 595 (374) days and 16 were initiated on LT-NIV and used it for 558 (479) days. On average, patients used respiratory support continuously for 908 (586) days. Baseline characteristics were comparable, apart from PaCO2 at first ventilatory support initiation (LT-HFNC/LT-NIV 7.1 (1.1) kPa/8.8 (0.9) kPa respectively (p = 0.002)). Both groups experienced a reduction in hospitalizations in the first twelve months after treatment initiation, compared to the twelve months before (LT-HFNC p = 0.022 and LT-NIV p = 0.014). In total, 25% of LT-NIV patients stopped treatment after HFNC initiation due to intolerance and 59% stopped LT-HFNC treatment 126 (36) days after LT-NIV initiation as monotherapy was sufficient. In 44% of these patients, LT-HFNC was re-initiated at the end of life. At the time of analysis, 70% of patients had died. In the last three months of life, patients stopped using LT-NIV, whereas 91% used LT-HFNC. In conclusion, the combined use of LT-NIV and LT-HFNC reduced hospitalizations in patients with COPD and persistent respiratory failure. The study indicates that LT-HFNC is well tolerated, and better tolerated than LT-NIV at the very end stages of COPD.

An exposed/unexposed cohort study assessing the effectiveness, the safety and the survival of patients established on home non-invasive ventilation after 80 years old

BackgroundLittle is known about the use of long-term non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in the elderly. We aimed to assess if the effectiveness of long-term NIV of patients ≥ 80 years (older) was not greatly inferior to that of patients < 75 years (younger). MethodsThis retrospective exposed/unexposed cohort study included all patients established on long-term NIV treated at Rouen University Hospital between 2017 and 2019. Follow-up data were collected at the first visit following NIV initiation. The primary outcome was daytime PaCO2 with a non-inferiority margin of 50% of the improvement of PaCO2 for older patients compared to younger patients. ResultsWe included 55 older patients and 88 younger patients. After adjustment on the baseline PaCO2, the mean daytime PaCO2 was reduced by 0.95 (95% CI: 0.67; 1.23) kPa in older patients compared to1.03 (95% CI: 0.81; 1.24) kPa in younger patients for a ratio of improvements estimated at 0.95/1.03 = 0.93 (95% CI: 0.59; 1.27, one-sided p = 0.007 for non-inferiority to 0.50). Median (interquartile range) daily use was 6 (4; 8.1) hours in older versus 7.3 (5; 8.4) hours in younger patients. No significant differences were seen in the quality of sleep and NIV safety. The 24-months survival was 63.6% in older and 87.2% in younger patients. Conclusionseffectiveness and safety seemed acceptable in older patients, with a life expectancy long enough to expect a mid-term benefit, suggesting that initiation of long-term NIV should not be refused only based on age. Prospective studies are needed.

Monitoring Long Term Noninvasive Ventilation: Benefits, Caveats and Perspectives.

Long term noninvasive ventilation (LTNIV) is a recognized treatment for chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure (CHRF). COPD, obesity-hypoventilation syndrome, neuromuscular disorders, various restrictive disorders, and patients with sleep-disordered breathing are the major groups concerned. The purpose of this narrative review is to summarize current knowledge in the field of monitoring during home ventilation. LTNIV improves symptoms related to CHRF, diurnal and nocturnal blood gases, survival, and health-related quality of life. Initially, patients with LTNIV were most often followed through elective short in-hospital stays to ensure patient comfort, correction of daytime blood gases and nocturnal oxygenation, and control of nocturnal respiratory events. Because of the widespread use of LTNIV, elective in-hospital monitoring has become logistically problematic, time consuming, and costly. LTNIV devices presently have a built-in software which records compliance, leaks, tidal volume, minute ventilation, cycles triggered and cycled by the patient and provides detailed pressure and flow curves. Although the engineering behind this information is remarkable, the quality and reliability of certain signals may vary. Interpretation of the curves provided requires a certain level of training. Coupling ventilator software with nocturnal pulse oximetry or transcutaneous capnography performed at the patient's home can however provide important information and allow adjustments of ventilator settings thus potentially avoiding hospital admissions. Strategies have been described to combine different tools for optimal detection of an inefficient ventilation. Recent devices also allow adapting certain parameters at a distance (pressure support, expiratory positive airway pressure, back-up respiratory rate), thus allowing progressive changes in these settings for increased patient comfort and tolerance, and reducing the requirement for in-hospital titration. Because we live in a connected world, analyzing large groups of patients through treatment of “big data” will probably improve our knowledge of clinical pathways of our patients, and factors associated with treatment success or failure, adherence and efficacy. This approach provides a useful add-on to randomized controlled studies and allows generating hypotheses for better management of HMV.

Outcomes of Long-Term Noninvasive Ventilation Use in Children with Neuromuscular Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objectives: To determine whether children with neuromuscular disorders using long-term noninvasive ventilation (NIV), continuous or bilevel positive airway pressure, have improved health outcomes compared with alternative treatment strategies. Data Sources: This systematic review is an extension of a scoping review. The search strategy used Medical Subject Headings and free-text terms for "child" and "noninvasive ventilation." Studies of humans from 1990 onward were searched in MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (Ebsco), Cochrane Library (Wiley), and PubMed. The results were reviewed for articles reporting on neuromuscular disorders and health outcomes including mortality, hospitalization, quality of life, lung function, sleep study parameters, and healthcare costs. Data Extraction: Extracted data included study design, study duration, sample size, age, type of NIV, follow-up period, primary disease, and primary and secondary outcome measures. Studies were grouped by primary disease into three groups: spinal muscular atrophy, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, and other/multiple neuromuscular diseases. Data Synthesis: A total of 50 articles including 1,412 children across 36 different neuromuscular disorders are included in the review. Mortality is lower for children using long-term NIV compared with supportive care across all neuromuscular disease types. Overall, mortality does not differ when comparing the use of NIV with invasive mechanical ventilation, though heterogeneity suggests that mortality with NIV is higher for spinal muscular atrophy type 1 and lower for other/multiple neuromuscular diseases. The impact of long-term NIV on hospitalization rate differed by neuromuscular disease type with lower rates compared with supportive care but higher rates compared with supportive care use for spinal muscular atrophy type 1, and lower rates compared with before NIV for other/multiple neuromuscular diseases. Overall, lung function was unaltered and sleep study parameters were improved from baseline by long-term NIV use. There are few data to assess the impact of long-term NIV use on quality of life and healthcare costs. Conclusions: Long-term NIV for children provides benefit for mortality, hospitalizations, and sleep study parameters for some sub-groups of children with neuromuscular disorders. High risk of bias and low study quality preclude strong conclusions.

Long-term non-invasive ventilation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): 2021 Canadian Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline update

BACKGROUND: Chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure is common in advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and it is associated with adverse outcomes such as repeat hospitalization and death. Long-term non-invasive ventilation (NIV) has been used with uncertain efficacy in this condition, but recent clinical trials suggest possible survival benefit and reduced hospitalization under specific circumstances with this therapy. METHODS: The purpose of this guideline update is to assess current evidence regarding long-term NIV in the treatment of chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure specifically related to advanced COPD. A representative multidisciplinary panel of expert clinicians undertook a formal clinical practice guideline development process. Four key clinical questions were defined according to the Patient/problem, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (PICO) approach. The panel performed a systematic literature review, assessed and graded the relevant evidence and made evidence-based recommendations. RESULTS: There is supportive evidence for the use of long-term NIV to improve survival in patients with stable COPD with significant chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure. The use of this therapy may also lead to reduced hospital readmission rates when applied to patients who were recently hospitalized for an acute hypercapnic exacerbation and in whom the elevated partial pressure of carbon dioxide in arterial blood (PaCO2) persists 2 to 4 weeks after the index hospitalization. Studies demonstrating benefit of long-term NIV targeted very selected patient populations and used very specific methodology, both of which are likely key elements for NIV success. Although there is no evidence from clinical trials directly comparing high-intensity versus low-intensity NIV, most successful clinical trials have used the former ventilation strategy. Therefore, when opting for long-term NIV in patients with COPD and chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure, we suggest using high-intensity ventilation (sufficient inspiratory pressures to meaningfully reduce PaCO2). We found no evidence to support the use of volume-assured pressure ventilation over standard pressure preset ventilation, which is currently the preferred mode. CONCLUSIONS: This 2021 guideline update represents an important shift from the previous recommendation against the use of long-term NIV in most patients with COPD and chronic hypercapnia, toward its suggested use. Based on the reported survival and hospital readmission rate benefits, we suggest long-term NIV in highly selected patients with COPD and chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure along with the use of specific and closely monitored ventilatory strategies.

Long-Term Non-invasive Ventilation in Children: Current Use, Indications, and Contraindications.

This review focuses on the delivery of non-invasive ventilation—i.e., intermittent positive-pressure ventilation—in children lasting more than 3 months. Several recent reviews have brought to light a dramatic escalation in the use of long-term non-invasive ventilation in children over the last 30 years. This is due both to the growing number of children receiving care for complex and severe diseases necessitating respiratory support and to the availability of LT-NIV equipment that can be used at home. While significant gaps in availability persist for smaller children and especially infants, home LT-NIV for children with chronic respiratory insufficiency has improved their quality of life and decreased the overall cost of care. While long-term NIV is usually delivered during sleep, it can also be delivered 24 h a day in selected patients. Close collaboration between the hospital complex-care team, the home LT-NIV program, and family caregivers is of the utmost importance for successful home LT-NIV. Long-term NIV is indicated for respiratory disorders responsible for chronic alveolar hypoventilation, with the aim to increase life expectancy and maximize quality of life. LT-NIV is considered for conditions that affect respiratory-muscle performance (alterations in central respiratory drive or neuromuscular function) and/or impose an excessive respiratory load (airway obstruction, lung disease, or chest-wall anomalies). Relative contraindications for LT-NIV include the inability of the local medical infrastructure to support home LT-NIV and poor motivation or inability of the patient/caregivers to cooperate or understand recommendations. Anatomic abnormalities that interfere with interface fitting, inability to protect the lower airways due to excessive airway secretions and/or severely impaired swallowing, or failure of LT-NIV to support respiration can lead to considering invasive ventilation via tracheostomy. Of note, providing home LT-NIV during the COVID 19 pandemic has become more challenging. This is due both to the disruption of medical systems and the fear of contaminating care providers and family with aerosols generated by a patient positive for SARS-CoV-2 during NIV. Delay in initiating LT-NIV, decreased frequency of home visits by the home ventilation program, and decreased availability of polysomnography and oximetry/transcutaneous PCO2 monitoring are observed. Teleconsultations and telemonitoring are being developed to mitigate these challenges.

Characteristics and outcomes in children on long-term mechanical ventilation: the experience of a pediatric tertiary center in Rome

BackgroundChildren with chronic respiratory failure and/or sleep disordered breathing due to a broad range of diseases may require long-term ventilation to be managed at home. Advances in the use of long-term non-invasive ventilation has progressively leaded to a reduction of the need for invasive mechanical ventilation through tracheostomy. In this study, we sought to characterize a cohort of children using long-term NIV and IMV and to perform an analysis of those children who showed significant changes in ventilatory support management.MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study of pediatric (within 18 years old) patients using long-term, NIV and IMV, hospitalized in our center between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2017. A total of 432 children were included in the study. Long Term Ventilation (LTV) was defined as IMV or NIV, performed on a daily basis, at least 6 h/day, for a period of at least 3 months.Results315 (72.9%) received non-invasive ventilation (NIV); 117 (27.1%) received invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Children suffered mainly from neuromuscular (30.6%), upper airway (24.8%) and central nervous system diseases (22.7%). Children on IMV were significantly younger when they start LTV [NIV: 6.4 (1.2–12.8) years vs IMV 2.1 (0.8–7.8) years] (p < 0.001)]. IMV was likely associated with younger age at starting ventilatory support (aOR 0.9428; p = 0.0220), and being a child with home health care (aOR 11.4; p < 0.0001). Overtime 39 children improved (9%), 11 children on NIV (3.5%) received tracheostomy; 62 children died (14.3%); and 74 children (17.1%) were lost to follow-up (17.8% on NIV, 15.4% on IMV).ConclusionsChildren on LTV suffered mainly from neuromuscular, upper airways, and central nervous system diseases. Children invasively ventilated usually started support younger and were more severely ills.

Long-term Non-Invasive Ventilation in Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The use of long-term non-invasive ventilation (NIV) to treat sleep and breathing disorders in children has increased substantially in the last decade; however, less data exist about its use in infants. Given that infants have distinct sleep and breathing patterns when compared to older children, the outcomes of infants on long-term NIV may differ as well. The aim of this study is to systematically review the use and outcomes of long-term NIV in infants. Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, CINAHL (via EbscoHOST), PubMed, and Wiley Cochrane Library were systematically searched from January 1990 to July 2017. Studies on infants using long-term NIV outside of an acute care setting were included. Data were extracted on study design, population characteristics, and NIV outcomes. A total of 327 studies were full-text reviewed, with final inclusion of 60. Studies were distributed across airway (40%), neuromuscular (28%), central nervous system (10%), cardio-respiratory (2%), and multiple (20%) disease categories. Of the 18 airway studies reporting on NIV outcomes, 13 (72%) reported improvements in respiratory parameters. Of the 12 neuromuscular studies exclusively on spinal muscular atrophy type 1 (SMA1), six (50%) reported decreased hospitalizations and nine (75%) reported on mortality outcomes. Risk of bias was moderate to serious, and quality of the evidence was low to very low for all studies. Most studies had an observational design with no control group, limiting the potential for a meta-analysis. The outcomes reported in studies differed by the disease category being studied. Studies on airway conditions showed improvements in respiratory parameters for infants using NIV. Studies on neuromuscular disorder, which were almost exclusively on SMA1, reported decreased hospitalizations and prolonged survival. Overall, it appears that NIV is an effective long-term therapy for infants. However, the high risk of bias and low quality of the available evidence limited strong conclusions.

Cohorte de patients nouvellement traités par ventilation non invasive à domicile. Étude observationnelle, prospective et multicentrique

Cohort of patients initiated to home ventilation. Observational and prospective study. The effectiveness of home noninvasive ventilation (NIV) for chronic respiratory failure (CRF) is well established. However, few data are available about home NIV prescription and utilization according to the different etiologies of respiratory failure. The ANTADIR Federation, in partnership with the Ventilatory Support Group of the French Speaking Pulmonary Society, has set up a national, observational and multicenter cohort study. The main goal of this study is to analyze the clinical data justifying home NIV prescription in patients with chronic respiratory insufficiency. The secondary objectives will be to assess: the evolution of comorbidities or their occurrence, hospitalizations, NIV compliance, dropout and survival. The population includes patients with chronic respiratory failure newly initiated onto NIV, both in a stable state and following an acute exacerbation who qualify for long-term NIV. Data collected include: diagnosis and comorbidities, age, sex, BMI, biomarkers (hematocrit, arterial blood gases, total CO2) and functional data (FEV1, VC, TLC), nocturnal results (SaO2, PtcCO2), type of ventilator used, ventilator parameters and mask type. Follow-up data will be collected at 4 months, 1 year and 2 years and will include: hospitalizations, changes in prescription, adherence, dropouts and deaths. This work will make it possible to obtain new scientific information on long-term NIV use in France.

Interfaces and ventilator settings for long-term noninvasive ventilation in COPD patients.

IntroductionThe establishment of high-intensity (HI) noninvasive ventilation (NIV) that targets elevated PaCO2 has led to an increase in the use of long-term NIV to treat patients with chronic hypercapnic COPD. However, the role of the ventilation interface, especially in more aggressive ventilation strategies, has not been systematically assessed.MethodsVentilator settings and NIV compliance were assessed in this prospective cross-sectional monocentric cohort study of COPD patients with pre-existing NIV. Daytime arterialized blood gas analyses and lung function testing were also performed. The primary end point was the distribution among study patients of interfaces (full-face masks [FFMs] vs nasal masks [NMs]) in a real-life setting.ResultsThe majority of the 123 patients studied used an FFM (77%), while 23% used an NM. Ventilation settings were as follows: mean ± standard deviation (SD) inspiratory positive airway pressure (IPAP) was 23.2±4.6 mbar and mean ± SD breathing rate was 16.7±2.4/minute. Pressure support ventilation (PSV) mode was used in 52.8% of patients, while assisted pressure-controlled ventilation (aPCV) was used in 47.2% of patients. Higher IPAP levels were associated with an increased use of FFMs (IPAP <21 mbar: 73% vs IPAP >25 mbar: 84%). Mean compliance was 6.5 hours/day, with no differences between FFM (6.4 hours/day) and NM (6.7 hours/day) users. PaCO2 assessment of ventilation quality revealed comparable results among patients with FFMs or NMs.ConclusionThis real-life trial identified the FFM as the predominantly used interface in COPD patients undergoing long-term NIV. The increased application of FFMs is, therefore, likely to be influenced by higher IPAP levels, which form part of the basis for successful application of HI-NIV in clinical practice.

S85 Initiation of long-term non-invasive ventilation enables successful weaning from prolonged mechanical ventilation

IntroductionProlonged mechanical ventilation is an increasing workload for intensive care units (ICU). Units distinct from ICU can provide step-down care for stable slow-to-wean patients and facilitate weaning by the use...

Long-Term Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) for COPD Patients with Chronic Respiratory Failure

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major health issue worldwide, with disease burden, healthcare costs, and mortality rates all significant and increasing. Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is used to manage acute exacerbations of COPD associated with mild-to-moderate acidosis. Continuing NIV after discharge can reduce the risk of re-exacerbation, and decrease hospitalisation rates and healthcare resource use. A number of positive effects have been documented during NIV treatment in patients with stable hypercapnic COPD. These include reductions in hypercapnia and hypoxaemia, improvements in quality of life (QoL) and neuropsychological function, reduced hospital admissions and costs, and improved benefit from pulmonary rehabilitation. The effect of NIV targeting carbon dioxide reduction on long-term survival remains to be clearly determined, but is the subject of ongoing research. Overall, accumulating evidence suggests that NIV also has a role in the long-term management of stable hypercapnic COPD. It is expected that long-term NIV will be most useful for the subgroup of patients with frequent exacerbations of disease. Co-morbidities such as obesity, heart failure, or sleep-disordered breathing could further support the use of long-term NIV in the setting of stable hypercapnic COPD.