One of the most important developments in the field of mechanical ventilation over the past 15 years has been the emergence of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) as an increasing part of the critical care armamentarium [1]. Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV) is the delivery of mechanical ventilation to patients with respiratory failure without the requirement of an artificial airway. Although NPPV is often used for long-term nocturnal or continuous support of patients with forms of chronic respiratory failure [2], its use is increasingly popular in varied clinical situations in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting as high-level evidence supporting its use continues to accumulate [3–5]. The attraction for NPPV relates primarily to its advantages over invasive mechanical ventilation (Table 1). It has been shown to comparatively decrease resource utilization and circumvent the myriad of complications associated with invasive mechanical ventilation such as upper airway trauma, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and compromise of speech and swallowing [6, 7]. NPPV should, however, be considered in some cases an alternative to invasive mechanical ventilation rather than its replacement [8–12]. Keys to the success of NPPV and to improve clinical outcomes of patients with acute respiratory failure are careful patient selection and a well-designed clinical protocol because failure of NPPV only delays potentially more definitive therapy with invasive ventilation [13]. Decades of experience during the polio epidemics [14, 15] and subsequently [16–18] established long-term nocturnal noninvasive ventilation stabilizes gas exchange and improves symptoms in patients with chronic respiratory failure. For home mechanical ventilation, noninvasive ventilation has a number of advantages over invasive mechanical ventilation, including greater ease of administration, reduced need for skilled caregivers, elimination of tracheostomy-related complications, enhanced patient comfort, and lower cost [19, 20]. However, as is the case in the acute setting, not all patients with chronic respiratory failure are good candidates for noninvasive ventilation. Long-term mechanical ventilation at home now incorporates both ventilator-dependent ([16 h per day ventilatory support) and ventilator-assisted (primarily nocturnal only) individuals, using a variety of devices and interfaces including invasive ventilation and NIV techniques [21]. The diversity of conditions and variability in level of care needed by these individuals means that introducing and maintaining long-term ventilation in the home requires skill and experience on the part of the prescribing center, particularly if the patient is using ventilatory support on a near continuous basis or has a tracheostomy in place for the delivery of ventilation [22–24]. Additionally, introducing medical technology into the home raises a number of issues for the patient and caregivers, as well as local health services, which need to be identified on an individual basis [25, 26].