Background: This study compares the long-term intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy of standalone MINIject (iSTAR Medical, Belgium) suprachoroidal implantation and two iStent (Glaukos, CA, USA) trabecular bypass implantation using a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: Systematic review of standalone implantation of MINIject or iStent inject with at least 24 months of follow up. The mean and standard deviation of IOP and the number of IOP-lowering medications at baseline and at 24 months were extracted. Weighted estimates of the outcome variables were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis models. Heterogeneity in the outcome measures among the studies was quantified using I². Results: Seven studies (three studies for MINIject and four for iStent) comprising 280 eyes were included. At 24 months, there was a greater reduction in IOP from baseline in the MINIject vs. two iStent cohorts (−9.57 vs. −4.92 mmHg, p = 0.03). The change from baseline in mean medication use was −1.00 with MINIject and −0.56 medications with iStent (p = 0.26). The mean percentage IOP reduction at 24 months ranged from 36.3−42.2% with MINIject compared to 5.2−40.7% with iStent, with greater variability in mean change from baseline in IOP observed in the iStent group (I2 = 96.5% vs. 0%). The most frequent adverse events for MINIject were anterior chamber inflammation, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) loss, hyphema, and conjunctival hemorrhage, and for iStent, these were device obstruction, BCVA loss, IOP spike, and cataract progression. Conclusions: While both MINIject and iStent inject devices resulted in significant reductions in IOP and IOP medication use, standalone MINIject may provide a greater and more consistent reduction in IOP.
Read full abstract