Long-term Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Research Articles

STENOSIS: Long-term single versus dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with ischaemic stroke due to intracranial atherosclerotic disease – a randomised trial

RationaleIntracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) is a pathological process that causes progressive stenosis and cerebral hypoperfusion, leading to stroke occurrence and recurrence around the world. The exact duration of dual antiplatelet...

Minimally invasive left atrial appendage occlusion plus reduced dose direct oral anticoagulant to prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation-the LAAO-PlusRE.

The onset of atrial fibrillation (AF) has a direct association with left atrial appendage (LAA) function, as demonstrated by recent studies demonstrating the link between left atrial (LA) wall fibrosis, impaired contractility, and the development of AF. Non-valvular AF (NVAF) affects almost 30 million people worldwide, with this number expected to increase in the next 20 years. It is the main cause of ischemic stroke, with significant subsequent economic and social impact. Currently, the mainstay of stroke prevention in patients with NVAF is oral anticoagulation (OAC), which reduces the incidence of ischemic events at the stake of increased hemorrhagic events. Despite the introduction and widespread use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), which almost completely replaced vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), the adherence to OAC is still low, hindering the efficacy of stroke prevention. Percutaneous LAA occlusion (LAAO) is now indicated (class IIB) in patients with NVAF at increased ischemic risk who cannot undergo OAC. Recently published data demonstrated that a reduced dose of DOAC after percutaneous LAAO is superior to long-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for stroke prevention in the mid-term. One of the possible pitfalls of percutaneous LAAO is postprocedural peri-device leaks (PDLs) that have been associated with increased thromboembolic events. According to LAAOS III results, surgical LAAO during cardiac surgery brings a 33% reduction in risk of stroke at five years, independently from the OAC regimen with a high rate of complete appendage occlusion. The combination of surgical LAAO and reduced dose DOAC might ensure adequate embolic prevention, lowering the hemorrhagic risk. The present manuscript aims to describe the rationale and design of the Minimally Invasive Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Plus REduced Dose DOAC To Prevent Stroke In Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Randomized Clinical Trial (LAAO-PlusRE).

Risk factors for intraoperative in-stent thrombosis during stent-assisted coiling of paraclinoid aneurysms.

To identify independent risk factors for intraoperative in-stent thrombosis (IST) in paraclinoid aneurysms (PAs). 172 PA patents undergoing stent-assisted coiling (SAC) were divided into an IST group (n = 12) and a non-IST group (n = 160). Clinical characteristics, aneurysm morphologies, and laboratory parameters were measured. We performed independent t tests (for normally distributed data) or non-parametric tests (for non-normally distributed data) to compare continuous parameters. Multivariate logistic regression analysis with a stepwise forward method was conducted to determine independent risk factors. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated, and the Delong test was employed for comparisons. Independent risk factors for IST included size ratio (SR) (p < 0.001, odds ratio [OR] = 3.909, confidence interval [CI] = 1.925-7.939), adenosine diphosphate (ADP) inhibition (p = 0.028, OR = 0.967, CI = 0.938-0.996), and reaction time (R) (p = 0.006, OR = 0.326, CI = 0.147-0.725). The combined factors (SR, ADP inhibition, and R) exhibited area under the curves of 0.870, 0.720, 0.716, and 0.697, with cutoff values of 2.46, 69.90%, and 4.65, respectively. The SR, ADP inhibition, and R values were independent risk factors for the IST in the PAs undergoing SAC. For PAs with a large SR, surgeons could prepare for long-term dual antiplatelet therapy before SAC.

Efficacy and Safety of Long-Term Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor is a standard therapy in patients with ischemic vascular diseases (IVD) including coronary artery, cerebrovascular and peripheral arterial diseases, although the optimal duration of this treatment is still debated. Previous meta-analyses reported conflicting results about the effects of long-term and short-term as well as non-DAPT use in various clinical settings. Herein, we conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of different durations of DAPT. We reviewed relevant articles and references from database, which were published prior to April 2023. Data from prospective studies were processed using RevMan5.0 software, provided by Cochrane Collaboration and transformed using relevant formulas. The inclusion criteria involved randomization to long-term versus short-term or no DAPT; the endpoints included at least one of total or cardiovascular (CV) mortalities, IVD recurrence, and bleeding. A total of 34 randomized studies involving 141 455 patients were finally included. In comparison with no or short-term DAPT, long-term DAPT reduced MI and stroke, but did not reduce the total and CV mortalities. Meanwhile, bleeding events were increased, even though intracranial and fatal bleedings were not affected. Besides, the reduction of MI and stroke recurrence showed no statistical significance between long-term and short-term DAPT groups. Long-term DAPT may not reduce the mortality of IVD besides increasing bleeding events, although reduced the incidences of MI and stroke early recurrence to a certain extent and did not increase the risk of fatal intracranial bleeding.

Clinical Practice Recommendations for Antithrombotic Management of Peripheral Artery Disease: An Indian Perspective

Abstract Currently, there are no guidelines or consensus recommendations on the antithrombotic management of peripheral artery disease (PAD) from an Indian perspective. In this article, we have summarized clinical practice recommendations on antithrombotic management of (i) asymptomatic chronic PAD (cPAD), (ii) symptomatic cPAD (intermittent claudication [IC] and chronic limb-threatening ischemia [CLTI]), and (iii) after revascularization (endovascular and surgical). An electronic search of the PubMed database was undertaken to identify relevant articles. Various combinations of keywords such as PAD, chronic peripheral arterial disease, asymptomatic chronic peripheral arterial disease, symptomatic chronic peripheral arterial disease, dual antiplatelet therapy, single antiplatelet therapy, dual pathway inhibition, antithrombotic, revascularization, endovascular, and surgical were used. Randomized controlled trials, case reports, practice guidelines, systematic literature reviews, and meta-analyses were screened and assessed. A roundtable meeting of experts (n = 13) was conducted to arrive at clinical practice recommendations. Experts made their decisions based on the evidence and guideline recommendations. In patients with asymptomatic cPAD and significant peripheral artery stenosis (PAS), long-term single antiplatelet therapy may be considered at the discretion of the clinician. There is no clear evidence in favor of long-term dual antiplatelet therapy in symptomatic cPAD. Experts agreed that low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin should be considered in patients with asymptomatic cPAD with &gt;50% PAS and conditions such as diabetes and polyvascular disease. This combination was also suggested in patients with IC, CLTI, postendovascular (stent based/nonstent), and surgical revascularization to reduce cardiovascular and limb ischemic risk, including major amputation in the absence of high bleeding risk or other contraindications.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in a Saphenous Vein Graft Failure: A Case Report

Abstract: Recent published data from the Society of Thoracic Surgery (STS) national database displayed that among patients aged &gt;65 years old who survived following an initial coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) operation, rates of repeat revascularization at 1, 5, 10, and 18 years were 2%, 8%, 16%, and 25%, respectively. The most preferred mode of revascularization was percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). While remain the most frequently used conduits beside left internal mammary artery (LIMA), saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) have high failure rates. Percutaneous coronary intervention in SVGs is associated with an increased risk of distal coronary embolization, commonly resulting in periprocedural MI. We reported a 79-year-old male patient admitted due to progressive symptoms of chronic coronary syndrome. The patient had a history of hypertension and a CABG surgery in 2012. Electrocardiogram showed ischemia and old myocardial infarction (OMI) in inferior leads as well as poor R wave progression in the precordial leads. Transthoracic echocardiogram displayed a normal ejection fraction but impaired left ventricular (LV) diastolic relaxation. Diagnostic coronary angiography revealed a 70% tubular stenosis in proximal part of SVG supplying posterior descending artery, patent LIMA graft to left anterior descending artery, and complex lesion on native vessel (chronic total occlusion in mid right coronary artery). Implantation of drug eluting stent in SVG-posterior descending artery was performed. Direct-stenting PCI technique using undersized-stent was done to prevent any complications. In conclusion, despite the high risk of complications, vein graft intervention was successfully performed without any complications. Since the high rates of in-stent restenosis following PCI in SVGs, long-term dual antiplatelet therapy should be commenced in this patient. Keywords: saphenous vein graft; vein graft intervention; percutaneous coronary intervention

Shortened Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Contemporary Clinical Review

Percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation is an integral aspect of minimally interventional cardiac procedures. The technology and techniques behind stent design and implantation have evolved rapidly over several decades. However, continued discourse remains around optimal peri- and post-interventional management with dual antiplatelet therapy to minimise both major cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events and iatrogenic bleeding risk. Standard guidelines around dual antiplatelet therapy historically recommended long-term dual antiplatelet therapy for 12 months (with consideration for &gt;12 months in certain patients); however, emerging data and generational improvements in the safety of drug-eluting stents have ushered in a new era of short-term therapy to reduce the incidence of major bleeding events. This case review will provide an overview of the current state of guidelines around duration of dual antiplatelet therapy and examine recent updates and continued gaps in existing research.

Meta-analysis of 3-month vs 12-month dual anti-platelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention

Abstract Background The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in the era of second generation drug-eluting stents is a matter of debate as increasing evidence suggests that shorter periods of DAPT are feasible and reduce bleeding events. However, the non-inferiority design of the published trials regarding ischemic events still raises doubt on its effectiveness. Methods We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate short-term (≤ 3 months) vs long-term (≥ 12 months) DAPT after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central were searched from inception to February 2023 to identify randomized controlled trials that compared outcomes of patients between these two regimens. Primary outcome of interest included a composite of ischemic events (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, re-revascularization and stroke) and secondary outcome was major bleeding as assessed by Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) classification ≥ 3 after 1 year of follow up. Event rates were extracted and Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effects model was used to perform the meta-analysis. Results We identified a total of 5 trials with 18.682 randomized patients. The use of short-term DAPT was not associated with increased risk of ischemic events (0.90 [0.75-1.08], p=0.250; Figure 1) and was associated with reduced risk of major bleeding (0.74 [0.65-0.84], p&amp;lt;0.001; Figure 2). Conclusion The present meta-analysis provides an updated data on the use of DAPT duration. Short-term DAPT appears to be equivalent to long-term DAPT regarding ischemic risk and a superior strategy in optimizing bleeding risk reduction.Forest plot of ischemic outcomesForest plot of bleeding outcomes

236 Assessing communication of duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy on discharge letters: an acute stroke unit audit

Abstract Background Short term Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy (DAPT) is commonly used for secondary prevention of major acute ischemic stroke events. However, long-term DAPT is associated with increased risk of bleeding without reduction in cardiovascular events. Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are often co-prescribed for prevention of gastroduodenal toxicity of DAPT, but long-term use has potential side effects. This audit aims to assess if clear instructions are provided regarding to duration of DAPT prescription in stroke medicine unit in tertiary referral hospital. Methods Retrospective analysis Electronic Medical Records (EMRs; discharge and clinical letters) who were admitted with TIA or AIS in 3-month period, excluding those who were transferred back to their referring hospital. Results 100 patients’ EMRs were reviewed. 34 were discharged on DAPT. 21 patients were reviewed in stroke OPD while 6 were readmitted to hospital. DAPT duration was documented in Discharge Letters (DL) of 28 patients (82%). In 28 (82%) patients, recommended durations of DAPT were documented in DL, 5(18%) of those were still inappropriately on DAPT on returning to OPD/readmission. 1 out of the 6 patients with no clear documentation of DAPT duration on DL were still inappropriately on DAPT. 22 patients were co-prescribed PPI, 19 of those had no documented recommended plan for PPI post completion of DAPT, and 12 of those were still on PPI on returning to OPD/readmission. 3 patients had a documented plan for PPI post completion of DAPT, 2 were still on PPI on returning to OPD/readmission. Conclusion Results were presented in stroke unit teaching. Key recommendations included education of NCHDs regarding clear documentation and communication with patients, pharmacists and GPs. Improvement in EMRs to highlight DAPT plan. Regular audits in this area.

Short Versus Long Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents Implantation in Patients with Diabetes.

Duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains uncertain, with increasing data suggestive of acceptable short-term duration. Metabolically accelerated atherosclerosis associated with diabetes makes it essential to study short-term DAPT in this subgroup. With limited studies determining optimal DAPT strategies after second-generation stents in this subset, we aimed to establish the optimal duration of DAPT in the diabetic population using second-generation stents. To determine optimal DAPT duration in diabetic population undergoing PCI in 2nd generation stents. We conducted an electronic database search of randomized controlled trials from PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases. A meta-analysis was conducted comparing outcomes of short-term (3-6 months) DAPT therapy versus long-term (12 months) DAPT therapy in the diabetic population undergoing PCI with second-generation stents. A total of 5 randomized controlled trials were included with a total of 3117 diabetic patients. Short-term DAPT did not show any statistical difference from long-term DAPT in achieving primary outcomes (relative ratio: 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68-1.35, P = 0.84). Overall mortality (OR 0.92; 95% CI, 0.52-1.63, P = 0.98), myocardial infarction [odds ratio (OR)OR 1.02; 95% CI, 0.53-1.94, P = 0.85], stent thrombosis (OR 1.20; 95% CI, 0.55-2.60, P = 0.55), target vessel revascularization (OR 1.10; 95% CI, 0.45-2.73, P = 0.74), and stroke (OR 0.50; 95% CI, 0.082-2.43, P = 0.81) did not show any statistical difference between the 2 groups. Similarly, a subgroup analysis of study population comparing 6 versus 12 months of DAPT in diabetic population did not show any difference in net primary outcomes (relative ratio: 0.86, 95% CI 0.45-1.45, P = 0.60). There was no significant heterogeneity noted between the 2 groups. This meta-analysis showed no statistically significant benefit of longer DAPT over shorter DAPT therapy in patients undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stent in patients with diabetes.

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Concise Review for Clinicians.

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) combines two antiplatelet agents to decrease the risk of thrombotic complications associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases. Emerging data about the duration of DAPT is being published continuously. New approaches are trying to balance the time, benefits, and risks for patients taking DAPT for established cardiovascular diseases. Short-term dual DAPT of 3-6 months, or even 1 month in high-bleeding risk patients, is equivalent in terms of efficacy and effectiveness compared to long-term DAPT for patients who experienced percutaneous coronary intervention in an acute coronary syndrome setting. Prolonged DAPT beyond 12 months reduces stent thrombosis, major adverse cardiovascular events, and myocardial infarction rates but increases bleeding risk. Extended DAPT does not significantly benefit stable coronary artery disease patients in reducing stroke, myocardial infarction, or cardiovascular death. Ticagrelor and aspirin reduce cardiovascular events in stable coronary artery disease with diabetes but carry a higher bleeding risk. Antiplatelet therapy duration in atrial fibrillation patients after percutaneous coronary intervention depends on individual characteristics and bleeding risk. Antiplatelet therapy is crucial for post-coronary artery bypass graft and transcatheter aortic valve implantation; Aspirin (ASA) monotherapy is preferred. Antiplatelet therapy duration in peripheral artery disease depends on the scenario. Adding vorapaxar and cilostazol may benefit secondary prevention and claudication, respectively. Carotid artery disease patients with transient ischemic attack or stroke benefit from antiplatelet therapy and combining ASA and clopidogrel is more effective than ASA alone. The optimal duration of DAPT after carotid artery stenting is uncertain. Resistance to ASA and clopidogrel poses an incremental risk of deleterious cardiovascular events and stroke. The selection and duration of antiplatelet therapy in patients with cardiovascular disease requires careful consideration of both efficacy and safety outcomes. The use of combination therapies may provide added benefits but should be weighed against the risk of bleeding. Further research and clinical trials are needed to optimize antiplatelet treatment in different patient populations and clinical scenarios.

Relation between duration of dual antiplatelet therapy and risk of ischemic stroke after stent-assisted treatment of cerebral aneurysm (DAPTS ACE-registry)

BackgroundThe optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with cerebral aneurysm who undergo stent-assisted coil embolization (SACE) has not been established. We aimed to clarify the association between...

Short Versus Long-Term Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients at High Bleeding Risk Undergoing PCI in Contemporary Practice: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis.

Patients at high bleeding risk (HBR patients) represent an important subset of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). It remains unclear whether a shortened duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) confers benefits compared with prolonged duration of DAPT in this patient population. The aim of this study was to investigate and compare bleeding and ischemic outcomes among HBR patients receiving short- versus long-term DAPT after PCI. A meta-analysis of studies comparing short-term (1-3months) and long-term (6-12months) DAPT after PCI with second-generation drug-eluting stents in HBR patients was performed. Six studies [1 randomized controlled trial (RCT), 2 RCT subanalyses, and 3 prospective propensity-matched studies] involving 15,908 patients were included in the meta-analysis. During a follow-up of 12months, short-term DAPT was associated with a reduction in major bleeding events [odds ratio (OR) 0.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42-0.95; p = 0.03, I2 = 71] and comparable definite/probable stent thrombosis, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), and ischemic stroke, compared with long-DAPT. Single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) with aspirin was comparable to SAPT with P2Y12 inhibitor, with no treatment-by-subgroup interaction for major bleeding events (p-interaction = 0.27). In studies including patients presenting with MI, a trend of more frequent MI was noted in the short-DAPT arm (OR 1.25, 95% CI 0.98-1.59; p = 0.07; I2 = 0). In a sensitivity analysis comparing 3- and 12-month DAPT, the 3-month DAPT strategy was associated with a higher risk of ischemic stroke (OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.15-4.87; p = 0.02, I2 = 0%). Short-term DAPT after PCI in HBR patients was associated a reduction in major bleeding events and similar ischemic outcomes. However, a higher risk of ischemic stroke and MI at 1 year of follow-up was seen in some subsets.

Sex Difference in the Impact of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy using Cilostazol for Secondary Stroke Prevention: A Sub-Analysis of CSPS.com.

Although some sex differences in stroke have been reported, differences in the effects of antiplatelet therapy for secondary stroke prevention have not been clarified. In the Cilostazol Stroke Prevention Study combination trial, patients with high-risk, non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke between 8 and 180 days after onset treated with aspirin or clopidogrel alone were recruited and randomly assigned to receive either monotherapy or dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) using cilostazol and followed up for 0.5-3.5 years. The primary efficacy outcome was recurrence of ischemic stroke. The safety outcome was severe or life-threatening hemorrhage. Outcomes were analyzed by sex. A total of 1,320 male patients and 558 female patients were included. The male patients had more risk factors than the female patients. In male patients, the primary endpoint occurred at a rate of 2.0 per 100-patient years in the DAPT group and 5.1 per 100 patient-years in the monotherapy group (hazard ratio (HR), 0.40; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.23-0.68). In male patients, DAPT prolonged the time to recurrent stroke by 4.02-fold (95% CI, 1.63-9.96) compared with monotherapy. In female patients, the average annual event rates were 2.7 per 100 patient-years in the DAPT group and 3.3 per 100 patient-years in the monotherapy group (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.37-1.84). Safety outcomes did not differ significantly in both male and female patients. Long-term DAPT using cilostazol reduced the recurrence of ischemic stroke and prolonged the recurrence-free time in male patients, but not in female patients.

Individualized or Uniform De-Escalation Strategies for Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Review of Clinical Trials with Platelet Function Testing and Genetic Testing-Based Protocols.

This comprehensive literature review assessed the effectiveness of precision medicine approaches in individualizing P2Y12 de-escalation strategies, such as platelet function testing guidance, genetic testing guidance, and uniform de-escalation, for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Analyzing six trials with a total of 13,729 patients, the cumulative analyses demonstrated a significant reduction in major adverse cardiac events (MACE), net adverse clinical events (NACE), and major and minor bleeding events with P2Y12 de-escalation. Specifically, the analysis found a 24% reduction of MACE and a 22% reduction of adverse event risk (relative risk (RR) 0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.71-0.82, and RR: 0.78, 95% CI 0.67-0.92, respectively). Reductions in bleeding events were highest with uniform unguided de-escalation, followed by guided de-escalations, while ischemic event rates were similarly lower across all three strategies. Although the review highlights the potential of individualized P2Y12 de-escalation strategies to offer a safer alternative to the long-term potent P2Y12 inhibitor-based dual antiplatelet therapy, it also indicates that laboratory-guided precision medicine approaches may not yet offer the expected benefits, necessitating further research to optimize individualized strategies and evaluate the potential of precision medicine approaches in this context.

Safety and efficacy of the Pipeline Flex embolization device with Shield Technology for the acute treatment of ruptured internal carotid artery pseudoaneurysms: a multi-institution case series.

Ruptured blister, dissecting, and iatrogenic pseudoaneurysms are rare pathologies that pose significant challenges from a treatment standpoint. Endovascular treatment via flow diversion represents an increasingly popular option; however, drawbacks include the requirement for dual antiplatelet therapy and the potential for thromboembolic complications, particularly acute complications in the ruptured setting. The Pipeline Flex embolization device with Shield Technology (PED-Shield) offers reduced material thrombogenicity, which may aid in the treatment of ruptured internal carotid artery pseudoaneurysms. The authors conducted a multi-institution, retrospective case series to determine the safety and efficacy of PED-Shield for the treatment of ruptured blister, dissecting, and iatrogenic pseudoaneurysms of the internal carotid artery. Clinical, radiographic, treatment, and outcomes data were collected. Thirty-three patients were included in the final analysis. Seventeen underwent placement of a single device, and 16 underwent placement of two devices. No thromboembolic complications occurred. Four patients were maintained on aspirin alone, and all others were treated with long-term dual antiplatelet therapy. Among patients with 3-month follow-up, 93.8% had a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2. Complete occlusion at follow-up was observed in 82.6% of patients. PED-Shield represents a new option for the treatment of ruptured blister, dissecting, and iatrogenic pseudoaneurysms of the internal carotid artery. The reduced material thrombogenicity appeared to improve the safety of the PED-Shield device, as this series demonstrated no thromboembolic complications even among patients treated with only single antiplatelet therapy. The efficacy of PED-Shield reported in this series, particularly with placement of two devices, demonstrates its potential as a first-line treatment option for these pathologies.

A comparison of safety and efficacy between long-term DAPT and intensive statins combined with short-term DAPT for acute ischemic stroke

ObjectivesThe current study compared the safety and efficacy of long-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT, aspirin plus clopidogrel) and intensive rosuvastatin with short-term DAPT for acute ischemic stroke (AIS).MethodsA total of 220 patients were enrolled 72 h after the onset of mild to moderate AIS, and divided into a control group treated with 21-day DAPT and a study group treated with intensive rosuvastatin with 7-day DAPT on a voluntary basis. The primary outcome was recurrent ischemic stroke and hemorrhage during a 90-day follow-up period in an intention-to-treat analysis. The secondary outcome was clinical efficacy with respect to alleviating existing focal nerve defect symptoms. A Cox proportional-hazards model was used to evaluate treatment differences.ResultsClinical efficacy was evident in 87.3% of patients in the study group, compared with 84.3% in the control group (p = 0.042). Recurrent ischemic stroke occurred in 9 patients (7.6%) in the study group and in 9 (8.8%) in the control group (p = 0.767). Hemorrhage occurred in 6 patients (5.1%) in the study group and in 15 (14.7%) in the control group (p = 0.023). In comparisons of levels of ALT, AST, LDH, and CK in the two groups before and 2 weeks after therapy, only CK differed significantly (p < 0.001).ConclusionsCompared to long-term DAPT, intensive rosuvastatin with short-term DAPT was equivalent in reducing the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke. It alleviated symptoms more rapidly, and significantly reduced the risk of bleeding, without causing an increase in transaminase or muscle enzymes.Clinical trial registrationChina Clinical Trial Registration Center (ChiCTR1800017809)

Short- versus long-term Dual AntiPlatelet Therapy for Stent-Assisted treatment of CErebral aneurysm (DAPTS ACE): a multicenter, open-label, randomized clinical trial

BackgroundThe optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after stent-assisted coil embolization (SACE) for cerebral aneurysm remains uncertain. This randomized trial of short- versus long-term Dual AntiPlatelet Therapy for Stent-Assisted...

Antithrombotic Management in AF Patients Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A European Perspective.

AF is a highly prevalent disease, often requiring long-term oral anticoagulation to prevent stroke or systemic embolism. Coronary artery disease, which is common among AF patients, is often referred for myocardial revascularisation by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), which requires dual antiplatelet therapy to minimise the risk of stent-related complications. The overlap of AF and PCI is a clinical conundrum, especially in the early post-procedural period, when both long-term oral anticoagulation and dual antiplatelet therapy are theoretically indicated as a triple antithrombotic therapy. However, stacking drugs is not a desirable option because of the increased bleeding risk. Several strategies have been investigated to mitigate this concern, including shortening triple antithrombotic therapy duration and switching to a dual antithrombotic regimen. This review analyses the mechanisms underlying thrombotic complications in AF-PCI, summarises evidence surrounding antithrombotic therapy regimens and reports and comments on the latest European guidelines.

The Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Clinical Outcomes after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Different Stent Sizes.

This study aimed to investigate the possible relationship between different stent sizes and clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with diabetes treated with drug-eluting stents (DESs) and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing elective PCI with the DES were entered into a retrospective cohort between 2003 and 2019. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as the combined endpoint of revascularization, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death, were recorded. The participants were categorized according to the stent size: 27 mm for length and 3 mm for diameter. DAPT (aspirin and clopidogrel) was used for at least 2 years for diabetics and 1 year for nondiabetics. The median duration of follow-up was 74.7 months. Out of 1630 participants, 29.0% had diabetes. The diabetics constituted 37.8% of those with MACE. The mean diameter of the stents in the diabetics and nondiabetics was 2.81±0.29 mm and 2.90±0.35 mm, respectively (P>0.05). The mean stent length was 19.48±7.58 mm and 18.92±6.64 mm in the diabetics and nondiabetics, respectively (P>0.05). After adjustments for confounding variables, MACE was not significantly different between the patients with and without diabetes. Although MACE incidence was not affected by stent dimensions in the patients with diabetes, the nondiabetic patients implanted with a stent length exceeding 27 mm experienced MACE less frequently. Diabetes did not influence MACE in our population. Additionally, stents of different sizes were not associated with MACE in patients with diabetes. We propose that using the DES supplemented by long-term DAPT and tight control of glycemic status after PCI could decrease the adverse consequences of diabetes.