Reviewed by: Hunter-Gatherers: An Interdisciplinary Perspective Daniel Sellen Hunter-Gatherers: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, edited by Catherine Panter-Brick, Robert H. Layton, and Peter Rowly-Conwy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2001. 341 pp. $30.00 (paperback), $85.50 (hardback). Hunter-Gatherers is an important collection that aims to combine a broader range of perspectives than recent books on hunter-gatherers have, and the editors seek to summarize current understanding of the enormous diversity in ecology, biology, and social organization and activity of hunting and gathering populations. After a brief introductory chapter by the editors that reviews the different approaches to definition and characterization of hunter-gatherers, the ensuing 10 chapters take a cross-cultural, diachronic, and comparative approach to a number of issues of special relevance to hunter-gatherers. These issues include behavioral ecology (B. Winterhalder); the archeological record on complexity and relationship to agriculture (P. Rowly-Conwy); the analysis of variability in technology (R. Torrence); comparison of present and past subsistence and technology (S. L. Kuhn and M. C. Stiner); the prehistory and history of hunter-gatherer language shift and language spread (P. McConvell); key debates concerning demography (R. Pennington); nutritional ecology (M. R. Jenike); evolutionary responses to climate, diet, and disease (A. Froment); approaches to the study of artwork and artistry (M. W. Conkey); and relations with non-hunter-gatherers and nation-states (R. Layton). I expect that several of these chapters will become widely cited by human biologists. Bruce Winterhalder offers one of the most concise and lively of his several summaries of the application of optimal foraging theory to humans. An initial section summarizes how we can analyze the strategic importance of variation in diet resource selection and patch residence, habitat use, residential and logistic mobility, field processing, harvest transportation, and territoriality. Then Winterhalder provides a timely and concise review of recently generated theoretical debate and data on food transfers in the context of hunter-gatherer social foraging and group life. Teasing apart the evolutionary and human biological implications of scrounging, reciprocity, showing off, costly signaling, risk minimization, and possibly other unnoticed forms of food transfer is an exciting challenge for behavioral ecological and nutritional anthropologists, and it has the potential to contribute enormously to models of the evolution of human sociality, life history, and diversity in hunter-gatherer and other subsistence strategies. The chapter could serve as a primer for students interested in these sorts of studies, although [End Page 407] one might quibble that the discussion of the four "regular features" of hunter-gatherers (apparent underproduction and lack of material accumulation, food sharing, egalitarianism, and gendered division of labor) excludes "complex" hunter-gatherers such as those in the American Pacific Northwest and archeological populations from Central Europe, Japan, and other regions. Mark Jenike offers a helpful summary and review of most of the available data on diet composition, energy intake, physical activity, and body size and proportion among recent and extant hunter-gatherer populations. These data, although piecemeal and drawn from only a handful of populations, evidence a striking diversity in adaptive response to the socioecological factors that link bodies and diets in different settings. The figure in the chapter that shows the range of body mass index values for men and women in various populations in relation to cut-offs indicating chronic energy deficiency (CED) is especially valuable. Although the figure confirms the general impression that hunter-gatherers are usually able to avoid serious undernutrition, the indication that women are at risk of CED in smaller populations and the observation that for many populations these aggregate mean values are close to the 18.5 cut-off value force us to reject the notion that hunter-gatherers rarely experienced nutritional stress. Rather, Jenike presents a picture of modern hunter-gatherers as having diverse and highly plastic biocultural responses to different dimensions of food shortage, and he concludes that mild to moderate nutritional stress is almost certainly underdetected among ancient hunter-gatherers. Renee Pennington marshals various lines of data to support the argument that human population growth was almost negligible throughout most of our foraging history because of infertility resulting from infectious disease. Although the inference that "there were so few of us for...