This article seeks to understand the distinction between mathematical and philosophical method made by Kant in the pre-critical and critical periods. The central hypothesis is that, in distinguishing mathematics and philosophy, Kant never proposed a philosophical method of mere conceptual analysis. To defend it, we first examine Inquiry concerning the distinctness of the principles of natural theology and morality, trying to highlight that Kant proposes that the appropriate method for philosophy must be based on an inner experience of the object. Then, we examine Discipline of pure reason present in the first Critique, where Kant, after clarifying the difference between philosophy and mathematics, proposes a solution as important as paradoxical: critical philosophy would be responsible for a method of synthesis a priori by concepts. Thus, our reading is opposed to Schelling, who argues that Kant would have proposed a method restricted to the logical analysis of concepts for philosophy.
Read full abstract