Locoregional Therapy For Hepatocellular Carcinoma Research Articles

Locoregional Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide with an average five-year survival rate in the US of 19.6%. With the advent of HBV and HCV treatment and prevention, along with the rising rates of obesity, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and metabolic syndrome are set to overtake infectious causes as the most common cause of HCC. While surgical resection and transplantation can be curative when amenable, the disease is most commonly unresectable on presentation, and other treatment approaches are the mainstay of therapy. In these patients, locoregional therapies have evolved as a vital tool in both palliation for advanced disease and as a bridge to surgical resection and transplantation. In this review, we will be exploring the primary locoregional therapies for HCC in patients with NAFLD, including transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), bland transarterial embolization (TAE), transarterial radioembolization (TARE), and percutaneous ablation.

Pre-transplant Loco-Regional Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Post-transplant Outcomes: A National Study.

The ultimate preferred treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) complicated with cirrhosis and portal hypertension is an orthotopic liver transplant (OLT). Loco regional therapy (LRT) has emerged to prevent tumor growth and progression of disease beyond the Milan criteria to achieve transplant. There is a paucity of data regarding safety, posttransplant survival benefits, and tumor recurrence rate achieved by these LRT modalities. We aim to assess and compare the five-year survival rate and tumor recurrence rate with or without LRT in patients after OLT with diagnosed HCC utilizing the nation's largest dataset. This is a retrospective observational study approved by Saint Louis University institutional review board. We utilized the largest dataset from the years 2003-2013 where pertaining data were gathered from Organ Procurement Transplant Network (OPTN) standard analysis and research files (STAR) through novel linkages with Medicare bills. Descriptive and comparative statistics were performed. 2412 (51.6%) patients received any form of locoregional therapy (single or combination) out of 4669 total study sample size. The overall five-year survival in the study sample was 76.1%. There was statistically no significant improvement seen in five-year posttransplant survival in the group that received one mode of LRT (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.97, P<0.64) or a combination of LRT (aHR 0.94, P<0.58) in comparison to those that received none after adjusting donor and recipient clinical characteristics. However, five-year survival trended higher among those treated with combination therapy over those treated with single LRT or none. Overall HCC recurrence was 4.8%, while no significant difference was noted when comparing above-mentioned groups. Five-year posttransplant survival and HCC recurrence rate were also found to have no difference when compared between above-mentioned groups after adjusting explant pathology. This is the largest retrospective study comparing liver transplant patients with HCC who received LRT to none. Although it did not show any statistically significant benefit of single or combination of LRT on survival or tumor recurrence after liver transplant for HCC patients, the outcomes encourage the safe and feasible use of LRT as a bridging therapy. Our study also suggests an observed pattern of improved posttransplant survival and tumor recurrence rate with combination loco-regional therapy. Larger multicenter prospective studies will be required to achieve the effect size to determine the best therapies for maximizing patient survival cost-effectively.

What is lurking beneath ?An unusual complication of locoregional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

What is lurking beneath ?An unusual complication of locoregional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

3D-CEUS/MRI-CEUS fusion imaging vs 2D-CEUS after locoregional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter prospective study of therapeutic responseevaluation.

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of 3D contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)/MRI-CEUS fusion imaging with 2D-CEUS in assessing the response of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to locoregional therapies in a multicenter prospective study. A consecutive series of patients with HCC scheduled for locoregional treatment were enrolled between April 2021 and March 2023. Patients were randomly divided into 3D-CEUS/MRI-CEUS fusion imaging group (3D/fusion group) or 2D-CEUS group (2D group). CEUS was performed 1 week before and 4-6 weeks after locoregional treatment. Contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) 4-6 weeks after treatment was set as the reference standard. CEUS images were evaluated for the presence or absence of viable tumors. Diagnostic performance criteria, including sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC), were determined for each modality. A total of 140 patients were included, 70 patients in the 2D group (mean age, 60.2 ± 10.4 years) and 70 patients in the 3D/fusion group (mean age, 59.8 ± 10.6 years). The sensitivity of the 3D/fusion group was 100.0% (95% CI: 75.9, 100.0), higher than that of the 2D group (55.6%, 95% CI: 22.7, 84.7; p = 0.019). The specificity of the 3D/fusion group was 96.3% (95% CI: 86.2, 99.4), which was comparable to that of the 2D group (98.4%, 95% CI: 90.0, 99.9; p = 0.915). The AUC of the 3D/fusion group was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.95, 1.00), higher than that of the 2D group (0.77, 95% CI: 0.56, 0.98; p = 0.020). 3D-CEUS/MRI-CEUS fusion imaging exhibits superior diagnostic accuracy in evaluating the treatment response to locoregional therapies for HCC. 3D-CEUS/MRI-CEUS fusion imaging can be applied for post-treatment assessment of residual tumors in HCC undergoing locoregional treatment, offering potential benefits in terms of accurate diagnosis and clinical management. Evaluating for HCC recurrence following locoregional therapy is important. 3D-CEUS/MRI-CEUS fusion imaging achieved a higher sensitivity than 2D-CEUS in assessing residual tumors after locoregional therapies. 3D-CEUS/MRI-CEUS fusion imaging can help clinicians intervene early in residual HCC lesions after locoregional treatment.

Validation of LI-RADS Treatment Response Algorithm after Loco-Regional Therapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Abstract Background Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third cause of cancer related death worldwide and liver cirrhosis is the most common predisposing factor for HCC. Loco-regional therapy as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) have very important role as potentially curative or palliative methods for treatment of HCC. Objective To investigate the potential application of LI-RADS Treatment Response [LRTR] algorithm in terminology and diagnostic performance after local- regional treatment of hepatic lesions. Methods During the period from September 2021 to March 2022, the present study included 31 patients: 26 were males and 5 were females with hepatocellular carcinoma treated by loco-regional therapy including 21 conventional TACE and 10 RF. Their ages ranged between 51 - 80 years with mean age of 70 years old. Results There were excellent inter-observer agreements between both reader radiologists regarding the classification of treated HCC: LR-TR viable, LR-TR non- viable and LR-TR equivocal according to major features of LIRADS. DWI and ADC as well as T1 and T2 pre-contrast signal are considered good ancillary features in evaluating post treatment response of treated HCC. Conclusion Our study demonstrates that LIRADS treatment response algorithm is a good reporting system for explaining the outcome of the treated HCC with loco-regional therapy as it doesn’t depend only on APHE and mentions that there is expected post-treatment enhancement pattern that does not denote viability. This isn’t found in modified RECIST criteria.

REPLACE: A phase III, randomized, open-label trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of regorafenib and pembrolizumab versus locoregional therapy (LRT) with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or transarterial radioembolization (TARE), for the first-line treatment of intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with beyond up-to-7 criteria.

TPS4200 Background: Intermediate-stage HCC represents a heterogeneous population, posing unique challenges for therapeutic management. With the advent of effective systemic therapies for unresectable HCC, the treatment landscape for intermediate-stage extends beyond LRT, particularly in patients with high tumor burden. The growing evidence about the benefit of systemic therapy in intermediate-stage HCC led to the inclusion in some recent guidelines of systemic therapy as the first choice of treatment in TACE-unsuitable patients with intermediate-stage HCC. Despite these recommendations, no randomized clinical trial has been published comparing LRT with TACE/TARE versus systemic therapy in patients with intermediate-stage HCC and high tumor burden. Methods: REPLACE is a phase III, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial that will compare the efficacy and safety of LRT with TACE/TARE versus systemic therapy, for the first-line treatment of intermediate-stage HCC with beyond up-to-7 criteria. Eligible participants will be randomized 1:1 to receive regorafenib (90 mg orally q.d. on days 1 to 21 of a 4-week cycle), and pembrolizumab (400 mg i.v. on day 1 of a 6-week cycle) or LRT with TACE or TARE, and will be stratified according to geographic region (Asia vs. non-Asia), ECOG Performance Status (0 vs 1) and Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) grade (1 vs 2). Patients must have intermediate-stage HCC with beyond up-to-seven criteria (Up-to-7 criteria = largest tumor diameter (cm) + number of tumors ≤7), measurable disease per RECIST 1.1, disease not amenable to curative treatment but amenable to LRT with TACE or TARE, no prior systemic or LRT for HCC, except for successful resection and/or ablation completed ≥ 6 months prior to randomization. Patients will be treated until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or other treatment discontinuation criteria is met. The primary endpoint is progression free survival (PFS), assessed locally by the Investigator using mRECIST for HCC. Secondary endpoints include PFS assessed locally by the Investigator using RECIST 1.1; PFS centrally assessed using mRECIST and RECIST 1.1; overall survival; overall response rate according to RECIST v.1.1 and mRECIST based on the Investigator’s and central assessment; time to unTACEable progression; duration of response; safety and tolerability of the trial treatments, and patient reported outcomes for health-related quality of life. The estimated enrollment is 496 patients from approximately 14 countries. Recruitment started in October 2023 and is currently ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04777851 .

Histological Changes in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Post-locoregional Therapy

Locoregional therapies are widely practiced in treatment of primary hepatocellular carcinoma and metastatic carcinoma to the liver as they provide a more targeted treatment with lesser side effects. Transarterial chemo-embolisation and selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) are a few examples. However, histopathological findings after locoregional therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma are rarely reported. We reported a case of a 61-year-old man with underlying Hepatitis B and subsequent hepatocellular carcinoma who was treated with SIRT followed by wedge liver resection. Macroscopically, the specimen showed a well-defined mass with areas of fibrosis and haemorrhage. Microscopic examination showed 70% tumour necrosis with numerous microspheres surrounded by multinucleated giant cells with histiocytes and chronic inflammatory cells. Currently, the patient is well with regular follow-up. The latest ultrasound findings showed no residual liver lesion in the background of liver cirrhosis. Although assessment of treatment response following locoregional therapy based on histopathological findings are not widely practiced, recognising histopathological changes such as tumour necrosis, provide valuable insight to a patient’s prognosis. Minimal to absent tumour necrosis implies poor response, limiting further locoregional therapy option. Findings of numerous microspheres might pose a diagnostic challenge as they mimic fungal organisms. Hence, histological examination with aid of special stains like periodic acid Schiff (PAS) and Grocott’s methenamine silver stain may be useful.

Locoregional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma: Thecurrent status and future perspectives.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common cancers and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Locoregional therapies (LRTs) play a crucial role in HCC management and are selectively adopted in real-world practice across various stages. Choosing the best form of LRTs depends on technical aspects, patient clinical status and tumour characteristics. Previous studies have consistently highlighted the efficacy of combining LRTs with molecular targeted agents in HCC treatment. Recent studies propose that integrating LRTs with immune checkpoint inhibitors and molecular targeted agents could provide substantial therapeutic benefits, a notion underpinned by both basic and clinical evidence. This review summarised the current landscape of LRTs in HCC and discussed the anticipated outcomes of combinations with immunotherapy regimens.

New insights into mechanisms and interventions of locoregional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is responsible for a significant number of cancer-related deaths worldwide and its incidence is increasing. Locoregional treatments, which are precision procedures guided by imaging to specifically target liver tumors, play a critical role in the management of a substantial portion of HCC cases. These therapies have become an essential element of the HCC treatment landscape, with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) being the treatment of choice for patients with intermediate to advanced stages of the disease. Other locoregional therapies, like radiofrequency ablation, are highly effective for small, early-stage HCC. Nevertheless, the advent of targeted immunotherapy has challenged these established treatments. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown remarkable efficacy in clinical settings. However, their specific uses and the development of resistance in subsequent treatments have led clinicians to reevaluate the future direction of HCC therapy. This review concentrates on the distinct features of both systemic and novel locoregional therapies. We investigate their effects on the tumor microenvironment at the molecular level and discuss how targeted immunotherapy can be effectively integrated with locoregional therapies. We also examine research findings from retrospective studies and randomized controlled trials on various combined treatment regimens, assessing their validity to determine the future evolution of locoregional therapies within the framework of personalized, comprehensive treatment.

Erratum: Differential expression of hepatic cancer stemness and hypoxia markers in residual cancer after locoregional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Erratum: Differential expression of hepatic cancer stemness and hypoxia markers in residual cancer after locoregional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Locoregional Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma prior to Liver Transplant: Comparative Pathologic Necrosis, Radiologic Response, and Recurrence

PurposeTo compare pathologic tumor necrosis rates after locoregional therapies (LRTs) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) prior to liver transplantation and evaluate radiologic-pathologic correlation along with posttransplant HCC recurrence. Materials and MethodsConsecutive patients with solitary HCC bridged or downstaged with LRT from 2010 to 2022 were included. LRTs were transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), radioembolization (yttrium-90 [90Y]), ablation, and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Upfront combination therapy options were TACE/ablation and TACE/SBRT. Subsequent therapy crossover due to local recurrence was allowed. Posttreatment imaging closest to the time of transplant, explant histopathologic necrosis, and tumor recurrence after transplant were reviewed. ResultsSeventy-three patients met inclusion criteria, of whom 5 (7%) required downstaging. 90Y alone (n = 36) and multimodal therapy (pooled upfront combination and crossover therapy, n = 23) resulted in significantly greater pathologic necrosis compared with TACE alone (n = 14; P = .01). High dose 90Y radiation segmentectomy (≥190 Gy; n = 27) and TACE/ablation (n = 7) showed highest rates of complete pathologic necrosis (CPN)—63% (n = 17) and 71% (n = 5), respectively. Patients with CPN had a mean lesion size of 2.5 cm, compared with 3.2 cm without CPN (P = .04), irrespective of LRT modality. HCC recurrence was more common in patients without CPN (16%, 6/37) than in those with CPN (3%, 1/36; P = .11). Using Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS), a nonviable imaging response was 75% sensitive and 57% specific for CPN. ConclusionsRadiation segmentectomy and multimodal therapy significantly improved CPN rates compared with TACE alone. A LI-RADS treatment response of nonviable did not confidently predict CPN.

Combination Therapy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors with Locoregional Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is estimated to be the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally, and its overall prognosis is dismal because most cases are diagnosed at a late stage and are unamenable to curative treatment. The emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has dramatically improved the therapeutic efficacy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma; however, their response rates remain unsatisfactory, partly because >50% of HCC exhibit an ICI-nonresponsive tumor microenvironment characterized by a paucity of cytotoxic T cells (immune-cold), as well as difficulty in their infiltration into tumor sites (immune excluded). To overcome this limitation, combination therapies with locoregional therapies, including ablation, transarterial embolization, and radiotherapy, which are usually used for early stage HCCs, have been actively explored to enhance ICI efficacy by promoting the release of tumor-associated antigens and cytokines, and eventually accelerating the so-called cancer-immunity cycle. Various combination therapies have been investigated in early- to late-phase clinical trials, and some have shown promising results. This comprehensive article provides an overview of the immune landscape for HCC to understand ICI efficacy and its limitations and, subsequently, reviews the status of combinatorial therapies of ICIs with locoregional therapy for HCC.

Repeated loco-regional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma is associated with inferior outcome after living donor liver transplantation in cirrhotic patients: Erratum.

Repeated loco-regional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma is associated with inferior outcome after living donor liver transplantation in cirrhotic patients: Erratum.

S3877 Hepatic Abscess Development Following Locoregional Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Decompensated Cirrhosis &amp; Prior Biliary Manipulation: A Case Series

S3877 Hepatic Abscess Development Following Locoregional Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Decompensated Cirrhosis &amp; Prior Biliary Manipulation: A Case Series

Role of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Prospective Single Institute Experience

Patients diagnosed with Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) complicated with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) have a limited number of treatment options available and are associated with an overall poor prognosis. With the recent developments in the field of radiation therapy, the role of radiotherapy particularly Stereotactic Body radiotherapy (SBRT) has increased as a loco-regional therapy for HCC. This study was planned to evaluate the role of SBRT in Locally advanced HCC complicated with PVTT and its role as loco-regional therapy. We conducted a prospective study that included patients diagnosed with HCC complicated with PVTT Child-Turcotte Pugh (CTP) Class A/B with a maximum score of 7, diagnosed on triple phase Contrast-Enhanced - MRI unsuitable for other ablative procedures. Patients with Bilirubin levels > 4 mg/dl, active Hepatitis, CTP score >7, normal liver volume <700cc or history of prior radiotherapy were excluded from the study. Patients underwent a contrast enhanced 4D-CT simulation with abdominal compression and were planned for SBRT using VMAT technique. Patients were followed-up as per Institute protocol. CECT or MRI for a radiological response was done for response assessment using mRECIST criteria version 1.1. A baseline MRI was done at one-month post-SBRT to understand any RT changes in the liver and to differentiate from tumor progression during the response assessment at three months. A total of 22 patients with HCC were recruited and received SBRT to PVTT, with a dosage between 30-42 Gy over 6 fractions treated on alternate days. Patients were assessed post-treatment with triphasic CE-MRI every 3 months as per institute protocol. Five patients had achieved Complete response in form of Portal vein recanalization. Three patients had Partial response to the treatment. Seven patients maintained stable disease status whereas six patients had disease progression during the entire course of treatment. The response rate (CR+PR) to treatment was 36.3% at the time of analysis. The Overall Response rate (CR+PR+SD) was 69%. No grade 3 or 4 toxicities were observed and treatment was tolerated well by patients. Kaplan-Meier method was applied to calculate the survival probability at various follow-up intervals. The median time for overall survival was 25 months ((95% CI: 15-35). Out of the 22 subjects included in the study, 6 patients died. There was a 78% survival probability at 12 months and a 68% survival probability at 18 months of follow-up. This prospective single-arm study demonstrated the vital role of SBRT in the treatment of Hepatocellular carcinoma with Portal vein tumor thrombosis and its efficacy in terms of achieving excellent local control with relatively lesser toxicities compared with existing treatment modalities. Patients have shown benefit post-treatment in terms of thrombus reduction and restoration of Portal vein flow making them suitable for further treatment like Resection or TACE.

Cancer Immunology: Impact of Radioembolization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Immune Response Modulation.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most prevalent primary liver cancer and the fourth most common cause of cancer mortality. The tumor microenvironment is increasingly recognized as having a central role in HCC carcinogenesis; factors such as tumor and immune cell interactions, cytokines, and extracellular matrix have key roles. Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is a locoregional therapy for HCC that not only has a direct tumoricidal effect but also induces an immune response against tumor cells with subsequent immunogenic cell death. This TARE-induced tumor immunogenicity occurs through enhancement of tumor-associated antigen expression and recruitment and diversification of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. In addition, immunologic biomarkers, including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte count, and cytokine levels, may be useful for predicting outcomes after TARE. Early data are promising regarding the potential synergistic benefit of treatment algorithms that combine TARE and immunotherapies, and interest is growing in the clinical application of such combinations. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of cancer immunology, summarize the available data on the biologic effects of TARE on local and systemic immune responses, and explore the potential role of the combination of TARE and immunotherapy for HCC.

Abstract 5465: Immune cell dynamics of patients and mice with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with anti-PD-L1 plus anti-CTLA-4 combination therapy

Abstract Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the major causes for cancer-related death. Single agent immunotherapy or combined immunotherapy have become the standard of care in advanced HCC. Recently, the combination of durvalumab (dur) plus a single dose of 300 mg tremelimumab (trem) (STRIDE regimen) have received FDA approval based on results from the HIMALAYA trial. However, immune responses have not been studied in detail. We tested the combination of 4 × 75 mg trem plus dur and locoregional therapies in HCC at and conducted correlative studies. Methods: We enrolled 28 patients with biopsy proven advanced HCC in an open-labeled phase 2 trial using dur and trem combined with ablative therapies (NCT02821754). Patients received four doses of 75mg trem every 4 weeks and 1500mg dur every 4 weeks until progression. Patients underwent an interventional radiologic procedure (RFA/TACE) on day 36. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and serum from patients enrolled were collected at baseline and after 1 cycle (day 28). PBMC was analyzed by multicolor spectral cytometry using a 17 antibody pan immune cell panel and a 25 antibody T cell panel. Serum samples from patients were collected at baseline and on day 28. Serum samples were analyzed with a 34-plex cytokine/chemokine array. Mice with orthotopically injected HCC (RIL-175 and Hep55.1C) were treated with anti-PD-L1 plus anti-CTLA4 and followed for tumor responses. Hepatic lymphocytes, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and splenocytes were analyzed by spectral cytometry from mice treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Results: 28 patients with advanced HCC were enrolled in this study. The best clinical response for treatment was the following, partial response (PR, n=5), stable disease (SD, n=12), progressive disease (PD, n=8), and not evaluable (n=3). Median PFS and OS were 4.5 and 20.8 months respectively. Patient PBMC analysis demonstrated an increase of regulatory T cells 1.65 times from baseline after 28 days in all patients. The frequency of Tbet+CD4+ T cells showed a non-significant increase in patients demonstrating a PR. Serum cytokine analysis revealed the levels of IL-18, IL-10, CCL-2, and VEGF-a increased in responders after treatment. in contrast, an increase of IL-6 and TNF-alpha after treatment was found only in patients with PD. In animal experiments, the size of liver tumors treated with anti-PDL1 and anti-CTLA4 were significantly smaller than that with isotype controls. The lymphocytes in the adjacent livers and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were analyzed. PD1+CD8+ T cells and Tbet+CD4+ T cells in the liver and TILs increased with combination treatment. Conclusion: Anti-PD-L1 and anti-CTLA4 combination therapy have an anti-tumor effect on HCC. We observed an expansion of PD1+ CD8+ T cells and Tbet+ CD4+ T cells. Citation Format: Yuta Myojin, Benjamin Ruf, Mohamed-Reda Benmebarek, Kylynda Bauer, Rajiv Trehan, Kelley Coffman, Chi Ma, Cecilia B. Monge, Changqing Xie, Tim Greten. Immune cell dynamics of patients and mice with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with anti-PD-L1 plus anti-CTLA-4 combination therapy. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 5465.

Evaluating treatment response following locoregional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: A review of the available serological and radiological tools for assessment

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an aggressive primary malignancy of the liver and is the third most common cause of cancer-related global mortality. There has been a steady increase in treatment options for HCC in recent years, including innovations in both curative and non-curative therapies. These advances have brought new challenges and necessary improvements in strategies of disease monitoring, to allow early detection of HCC recurrence. Current serological and radiological strategies for post-treatment monitoring and prognostication and their limitations will be discussed and evaluated in this review.

Image-guided percutaneous locoregional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer and the 3rd leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Treatment options include surgical resection, liver transplantation, imageguided percutaneous locoregional options, external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and systemic therapies. Treatment choice depends on the stage of the disease and patient's characteristics including performance status and liver function. Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system, with its recent 2022 update, is one of the most widely endorsed staging system. Locoregional therapies (LRT) are recommended for very early stage (BCLC-0), early stage (BCLC-A), and the two first subgroups of intermediate stage (BCLC-B). Image-guided percutaneous locoregional therapies include ablation, mainly thermal ablation with radiofrequency (RFA), microwave ablations (MWA) and cryoablation, transarterial embolization (TAE, also known as bland embolization), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), drug-eluding beadstransarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE), combination of ablation with embolization, transarterial radioembolization (TARE) also known as selective internal radioembolization therapy, and hepatic artery infusion (HAI). While ablation is recognized as a curative therapy, all intra-arterial therapies are considered non-curative options. There is growing evidence that TARE, through radiation segmentectomy, can be considered a curative intent treatment in appropriate selective patients. In this article, we will review indications, complications, and outcomes of locoregional therapies for HCC.

The locoregional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

The locoregional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma