Locoregional Progression-free Survival Research Articles

Association of MORC2 expression with progression-free survival in cervical cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

MORC family CW-type zinc finger 2 (MORC2) is a newly identified chromatin remodeling protein, and has been proposed as a prognostic biomarker associated with survival in some types of human cancer, but the role of MORC2 in cervical cancer remains unknown. Here, we investigated the role of MORC2 expression in predicting the survival outcomes of locally advanced cervical cancer patients treated with cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). In this retrospectively study, we detected MORC2 immunohistochemical expression on 55 biopsies from patients who underwent CCRT. The association between the MORC2 expression and various clinicopathological characteristics were analyzed, as were association between MORC2 expression and locoregional failure and progression-free survival (PFS) of cervical cancer patients. MORC2 expression was positively associated with pelvic node metastasis and locoregional failure. Higher MORC2 expression was a significant indicator of worse PFS. Our results suggest that MORC2 expression may be a prognostic indicator in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer undergoing CCRT.

Transarterial chemoembolization for renal cell carcinoma patients with liver metastases in the era of immunotherapy: A case series

Treatment for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has changed rapidly in the past decade with the widespread implementation of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as first-line therapy in metastatic disease. The presence of liver metastases is a poor prognostic indicator but also has the potential to be a target for localized therapy. However, there is limited knowledge on the dynamics and long-term effects of combining liver-directed transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with ICI therapy. We identified four patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC) and liver metastases who were treated concurrently with ICIs and TACE to metastatic liver lesions from our institutional database. We assessed treatment radiological responses and toxicity in this cohort. Liver-directed TACE with concurrent ICI was associated with radiological response or stabilization in all the liver lesions in the four patients in this cohort with a median time to locoregional liver metastasis progression-free survival of 8.3 months (range 6.0–11.1). The concurrent administration of ICI therapy and TACE to liver lesions was well tolerated with no new safety signals and no immune-related toxicities. Combining TACE with ICI in patients with mRCC showed promising response with limited toxicity. Future studies are warranted to clarify treatment timing and validate benefits.

High versus standard radiation dose of definitive chemoradiotherapy combined with immunotherapy for inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A multicenter propensity score matching analysis.

e16118 Background: There is no consensus of the radiation dose for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in the setting of definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) combined with immunotherapy. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of high-dose (HD) versus standard-dose radiotherapy (SD) for locally inoperable ESCC. Methods: Patients with locally advanced unresectable ESCC or advanced ESCC with supraclavicular lymph node metastases only who received high-dose (≥ 60Gy) or standard-dose (50-50.4Gy) radiation in dCRT combined with anti-PD-1 antibody as the first-line treatment from four academic cancer centers were enrolled. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to minimize the potential confounding effects. Results: Between March 2019 and July 2022, 328 patients were enrolled from four cancer centers in China, with 163 patients in the HD and 165 patients in the SD groups, respectively. The median follow-up time in the HD and SD groups were 28.9 and 25.9 months, respectively. There was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) (median OS: not reached in both, P = 0.080), progression-free survival (PFS) (median PFS: not reached vs. 30.3 months, P = 0.073), locoregional progression-free survival (LRPFS) and distant metastasis survival (DM) between the HD and SD groups. After 1:2 PSM, 156 patients in the HD and 78 patients in the SD groups were selected for further analyses. The results remained consistent and showed that the HD group had no significant benefits in OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.50-1.51, P = 0.624), PFS (HR = 0.79, 95%CI = 0.51-1.23, P = 0.300), LRPFS (HR = 0.75, 95%CI = 0.47-1.19, P = 0.228) and DM (HR = 1.05, 95%CI = 0.64-1.73, P = 0.849), compared with the SD group. In terms of failure patterns, the incidences of locoregional failure only (13.5% vs. 16.7%, P = 0.512), distant failure only (10.9% vs. 9.0%, P = 0.648) and synchronous locoregional and distant failure (2.6% vs. 6.4%, P = 0.164) were similar between two groups. No significant difference was found in the incidences of hematological toxicities, esophagitis, pneumonia (12.2% vs. 10.3%, P = 0.664) and fistula (7.1% vs 9.0%, P = 0.603) between the HD and SD groups. Conclusions: Compared with a radiation dose of 50-50.4Gy, the increase in radiation dose (≥60Gy) did not result in survival benefits for inoperable ESCC patients receiving dCRT combined with immunotherapy. Furthermore, similar failure patterns and toxicities were observed between the two treatment groups.

Preliminary outcomes of boron neutron capture therapy for head and neck cancers as a treatment covered by public health insurance system in Japan: Real-world experiences over a 2-year period.

Since June 2020, boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) has been a health care service covered by health insurance in Japan to treat locally advanced or recurrent unresectable head and neck cancers. Therefore, we aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of BNCT as a health insurance treatment and explore its role among the standard treatment modalities for head and neck cancers. We retrospectively analyzed data from patients who were treated using BNCT at Kansai BNCT Medical Center, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, between June 2020 and May 2022. We assessed objective response rates based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, and adverse events based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Additionally, we conducted a survival analysis and explored the factors that contributed to the treatment results. Sixty-nine patients (72 treatments) were included in the study, with a median observation period of 15 months. The objective response rate was 80.5%, and the 1-year locoregional control, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 57.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 43.9%-68.3%), 42.2% (95% CI: 30.1%-53.8%), and 75.4% (95% CI: 62.5%-84.5%), respectively. Locoregional control was significantly longer in patients with earlier TNM staging and no history of chemotherapy. BNCT may be an effective treatment option for locally advanced or recurrent unresectable head and neck cancers with no other definitive therapies. If definitive surgery or radiation therapy are not feasible, BNCT should be considered at early disease stages.

Anti‑epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody therapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer: A systematic review of phase III clinical trials.

The present systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of anti-EGFR therapy in combination with radiotherapy (RT) or with chemoradiation compared with the existing standard of care for the treatment of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC). The PubMed, SCOPUS, EMBASE and COCHRANE databases were searched and 12 phase III randomized controlled trials were included. The effectiveness of the anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody cetuximab was evaluated in nine trials. Nimotuzumab (one trial), zalutumumab (one trial) and panitumumab (one trial) were the monoclonal antibodies evaluated in the remaining three trials. One study tested the effectiveness of adding cetuximab to radical RT and found that patients with LAHNSCC exhibited improvement in locoregional control (LRC), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared with those of patients treated with RT alone. A total of three studies tested the effectiveness of adding an anti-EGFR agent to chemoradiation. Of these, a single institution study in which patients received cisplatin at 30 mg/m2 weekly, instead of the standard doses of 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks or 40 mg/m2 every week, reported significant improvement in PFS with the addition of nimotuzumab to chemoradiotherapy without an improvement in overall survival. However, the other two studies indicated that, when added to standard chemoradiation, the anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies cetuximab or zalutumumab did not improve survival outcomes. Two phase III trials evaluated RT plus an anti-EGFR agent compared with chemoradiation alone. Of these, one study reported inferior outcomes with cetuximab-RT in terms of OS and LRC, whereas the other study with panitumumab plus RT failed to prove the non-inferiority. Two trials evaluated induction chemotherapy followed by cetuximab-RT compared with chemoradiotherapy and reported no benefits in terms of OS or PFS. Furthermore, one study evaluated induction chemotherapy followed by cetuximab-RT compared with induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy and found no improvement in OS or PFS. Finally, three phase III trials tested the effectiveness of cetuximab plus RT in the treatment of human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma, and found it to be inferior compared with cisplatin-RT in terms of OS, PFS and failure-free survival. Based on the aforementioned findings, it is difficult to conclude that anti-EGFR therapy in any form has an advantage over conventional chemoradiation in the treatment of LAHNSCC.

Phase I/II study of stereotactic body radiotherapy boost in patients with cervical cancer ineligible for intracavitary brachytherapy

PurposeStereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) boost is a promising treatment for cervical cancer patients who are ineligible for intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT). The aim of this multicenter, single-arm, phase I/II study was to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of SBRT boost.Materials and methodsICBT-ineligible patients with untreated cervical cancer were enrolled. Patients underwent whole-pelvic radiotherapy (45 Gy in 25 fractions) with SBRT boost to the primary lesion. In the phase I dose-escalation cohort (3 + 3 design), patients were treated with SBRT boost of 21 or 22.5 Gy in three fractions. Although dose-limiting toxicity was not confirmed, a dose of 21 Gy was selected for the phase II cohort because it was difficult to reproduce the pelvic organs position in two patients during the phase I trial. The primary endpoint was 2-year progression-free survival.ResultsTwenty-one patients (phase I, n = 3; phase II, n = 18) were enrolled between April 2016 and October 2020; 17 (81%) had clinical stage III–IV (with para-aortic lymph node metastases) disease. The median (range) follow-up was 40 (10–84) months. The initial response was complete response in 20 patients and partial response in one patient. The 2-year locoregional control, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 84%, 67%, and 81%, respectively. Grade ≥ 3 toxicity was confirmed in one patient each in the acute (diarrhea) and late (urinary tract obstruction) phases.ConclusionThese findings suggested that a SBRT boost is more effective than the conventional EBRT boost and can be an important treatment option for ICBT-ineligible patients with cervical cancer.Study registrationThis study was registered at the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000036845).

Impact of adaptive radiotherapy on survival in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

To investigate the clinical significance of adaptive radiotherapy (ART) in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Eligible patients were treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy using IMRT. Planning computed tomography in ART was performed during radiotherapy, and replanning was performed. Since ART was started in May 2011 (ART group), patients who were treated without ART up to April 2011 (non-ART group) were used as the historical control. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate overall survival (OS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). LRFS for the primary tumor (LRFS_P) and regional lymph node (LRFS_LN) were also studied for more detailed analysis. Statistical significance was evaluated using the log-rank test for survival. The ART group tended to have higher radiation doses. The median follow-up period was 127 months (range, 10 to 211 months) in the non-ART group and 61.5 months (range, 5 to 129 months) in the ART group. Compared to the non-ART group, the ART group showed significantly higher 5-year PFS (53.8% vs. 81.3%, p = 0.015) and LRFS (61.2% vs. 85.3%, p = 0.024), but not OS (80.7% vs. 80.8%, p = 0.941) and DMFS (84.6% vs. 92.7%, p = 0.255). Five-year LRFS_P was higher in the ART group (61.3% vs. 90.6%, p = 0.005), but LRFS_LN did not show a significant difference (91.9% vs. 96.2%, p = 0.541). Although there were differences in the patient backgrounds between the two groups, this study suggests the potential effectiveness of ART in improving locoregional control, especially in the primary tumor.

Adult head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma: radiotherapy- based treatment, outcomes, and predictors of survival

BackgroundAdult head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma (HNRMS) is an exceptionally rare malignancy, and there is a paucity of data and research dedicated to understanding its characteristics and management in adult populations. This study aimed to assess the outcomes and identify survival predictors in adult HNRMS.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated 42 adult patients (> 16 years) with HNRMS who received radiotherapy (RT)-based treatment at our institute between 2008 and 2022. We analysed the clinical characteristics and prognosis of these patients, including the locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), using the Kaplan–Meier method. The chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were used to analyse differences between groups for dichotomous and categorical variables, respectively. Survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Prognostic variables were assessed through univariate Cox analyses.ResultsThe median patient age was 28 years (range, 16–82 years). Alveolar RMS was the most common histological type, observed in 21 patients (50.0%), followed by embryonal in 16 patients (38.1%). The anatomic sites of origin were orbital in one (2.4%), parameningeal in 26 (61.9%), and non-orbital/non-parameningeal in 15 (35.7%) patients. Nineteen patients (45.2%) had regional lymph node metastasis, and five patients (11.9%) presented with distant metastatic disease. Distant metastasis (n = 17) was the primary cause of treatment failure. At a median follow-up of 47.0 months, the 5-year LRFS, PFS, and OS rates were 69.0%, 39.7%, and 41.0%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that tumour size, lymph node involvement, and the local treatment pattern (surgery and RT vs. RT alone) were significant predictors of survival.ConclusionsThe main failure pattern in patients with HNRMS receiving RT-based treatment was distant metastasis. Tumour size > 5 cm and lymph node involvement were predictors of worse LRFS. Multimodality local treatment, combining surgery and RT, is effective and provides survival benefits.

Consolidation chemotherapy after definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a multicenter non-inferiority phase III randomized clinical trial

BackgroundDefinitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (dCCRT) is the gold standard for the treatment of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the potential benefits of consolidation chemotherapy after dCCRT in patients with esophageal cancer remain debatable. Prospective randomized controlled trials comparing the outcomes of dCCRT with or without consolidation chemotherapy in patients with ESCC are lacking. In this study, we aim to generate evidence regarding consolidation chemotherapy efficacy in patients with locally advanced, inoperable ESCC.MethodsThis is a multicenter, prospective, open-label, phase-III randomized controlled trial comparing non-inferiority of dCCRT alone to consolidation chemotherapy following dCCRT. In total, 600 patients will be enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either consolidation chemotherapy after dCCRT (Arm A) or dCCRT alone (Arm B). Overall survival will be the primary endpoint, whereas progression-free survival, locoregional progression-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and treatment-related toxicity will be the secondary endpoints.DiscussionThis study aid in further understanding the effects of consolidation chemotherapy after dCCRT in patients with locally advanced, inoperable ESCC.Trial registrationChiCTR1800017646.

Biomechanical imaging biomarker during chemoradiotherapy predicts treatment response in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Objective. For response-adapted adaptive radiotherapy (R-ART), promising biomarkers are needed to predict post-radiotherapy (post-RT) responses using routine clinical information obtained during RT. In this study, a patient-specific biomechanical model (BM) of the head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) was proposed using the pre-RT maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and tumor structural changes during RT as evaluated using computed tomography (CT). In addition, we evaluated the predictive performance of BM-driven imaging biomarkers for the treatment response of patients with HNSCC who underwent concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Approach. Patients with histologically confirmed HNSCC treated with definitive CCRT were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent CT two times as follows: before the start of RT (pre-RT) and 3 weeks after the start of RT (mid-RT). Among these patients, 67 patients who underwent positron emission tomography/CT during the pre-RT period were included in the final analysis. The locoregional control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) prediction performances of whole tumor stress change (TS) between pre- and mid-RT computed using BM were assessed using univariate, multivariate, and Kaplan–Meier survival curve analyses, respectively. Furthermore, performance was compared with the pre and post-RT SUVmax, tumor volume reduction rate (TVRR) during RT, and other clinical prognostic factors. Main results. For both univariate, multivariate, and survival curve analyses, the significant prognostic factors were as follows (p < 0.05): TS and TVRR for LC; TS and pre-RT FDG-SUVmax for PFS; and TS only for OS. In addition, for 2 year LC, PFS, and OS prediction, TS showed a comparable predictive performance to post-RT FDG-SUVmax. Significance. BM-driven TS is an effective prognostic factor for tumor treatment response after CCRT. The proposed method can be a feasible functional imaging biomarker that can be acquired during RT using only routine clinical data and may provide useful information for decision-making during R-ART.

Neoplasia-related and treatment-induced lymphopenia: impact on the outcome of chemoradiotherapy in laryngeal cancer

Introduction The role of the immune system in the efficacy of radiotherapy (RT) has been well established. We examined the role of neoplasia-related and treatment-induced lymphopenia in the outcome of RT or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in squamous cell laryngeal cancer. Materials and Methods We retrospectively analyzed a series of 135 laryngeal carcinomas treated with radical or postoperative RT/CRT. Six lymphocyte-related variables were defined and examined: i. lymphocyte counts (LCs) before a brief course of induction chemotherapy, ii. pre-RT LCs, iii. post-RT LCs, iv. pre-RT neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (N/L), v. pre-RT monocyte/lymphocyte ratio (M/L), and vi. pre-RT platelet/lymphocyte ratio (Pt/L). Results RT and CRT resulted in a significant decrease of LCs at the end of therapy, and this was significantly more prominent in patients treated with radical intent and neck irradiation (median LC nadir 810/μl vs. 1250/μl; p = .0003). Induction chemotherapy did not intensify the lymphotoxic effect of RT. LCs lower than the 33rd percentile before RT (<1718/μl) and after RT (<720/μl) were significantly linked to poor locoregional progression-free survival (LRFS; p = .02 and p = .08, respectively) and disease-specific overall survival (OS; p = .02 and p = .03, respectively). This was also confirmed multivariate analysis (LRFS: p = .006/HR = 2.41 and p = .08/HR = 1.76, respectively; OS: p = .001/HR = 3.06 and p = .02/HR = 2.07, respectively). High pre-RT N/L, M/L, and Pt/L ratios were also of ominous prognostic relevance. Conclusions Both neoplasia-related and RT-induced lymphopenia define the outcome of RT in terms of locoregional failure, incidence of metastasis, and, finally, disease-specific survival of patients with laryngeal cancer. Restoration of pre-RT lymphopenia and protection of peripheral lymphocytes during RT emerge as critical issues that demand therapeutic interventions to maximize the efficacy of RT/CRT in patients with laryngeal cancer.

Impact and optimal timing of local therapy addition in borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer after FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy

BackgroundTo evaluate the efficacy and optimal timing of local treatment in patients with borderline resectable (BR) or locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) treated with upfront FOLFIRINOX. MethodBetween 2015 and 2020, 258 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) were analysed. Treatment outcomes were compared between systemic treatment group (ST) and multimodality treatment groups (MT) using Kaplan–Meier curves and log-rank test. The MT were stratified as follows: FOLFIRINOX + radiation therapy (RT) (MT1), FOLFIRINOX + surgical resection (MT2), and FOLFIRINOX + RT + surgical resection (MT3). ResultsWith median follow-up period of 18 months, the 2-year overall survival (OS) for the ST was 22.0%, and it was significantly worse than MT (MT1, 46.3%; MT2, 65.7% and MT3; 90.2%; P < .001). The 2-year locoregional progression free survival (LRPFS) and overall PFS in ST were 10.7% and 7.0%, which were also significantly lower than those of MT (2-year LRPFS: MT1, 31.8%; MT2, 45.3%; MT3, 81.0%; 2-year overall PFS: MT1, 23.3%; MT2, 35.0%; MT3, 66.3%; P < .001). In time-varying multivariate Cox proportional hazard model, local treatment contributed to better treatment outcomes, with adjusted hazard ratios of 0.568 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.398-0.811), 0.490 (95% CI, 0.331-0.726), and 0.656 (95% CI, 0.458–0.940) for OS, LRPFS, and overall PFS, respectively. The time window of 11–17 months after FOLFIRINOX appeared to demonstrate the maximal efficacy of local treatments in OS. ConclusionsAdding local treatment in BR/LAPC patients treated with upfront FOLFIRINOX seemed to contribute in improved treatment outcomes, and it showed maximal efficacy in OS when applied 11-17 months after the initiation of FOLFIRINOX. We suggest that administration of sufficient period of upfront FOLFIRINOX may intensify the efficacy of local treatments, and well controlled prospective trials are expected.

Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy as Primary Treatment for Residual Bladder Cancer After Transurethral Resection

The aim of this study was to determine whether escalating the local radiation dose can improve the outcome of residual bladder cancer after transurethral resection of bladder tumor without increasing treatment-related toxicity. The treatment plans and medical records of patients with bladder cancer treated with curative-intent radiation therapy between 2008 and 2020 were reviewed. Those who had residual tumors in the computed tomography simulation images were included. A cumulative radiation dose higher than 6600 cGy was defined as dose escalation. The effect of dose escalation on 3-year locoregional control, progression-free survival, and overall survival was evaluated. A total of 149 patients with residual tumors were identified. The median follow-up period was 27.5 months. Among them, 51 patients received an escalated radiation dose, and 98 received a standard dose in the residual tumor area. Patients in the dose-escalation group had higher 3-year locoregional control (65.6% vs 27.8%; P < .001) and progression-free survival (42.6% vs 18.2%; P < .001) than the standard-dose group. Overall survival also showed a trend favoring the dose-escalation group (54.9% vs 36.2%; P=.059). In the multivariate analyses, the differences between the dose-escalation and standard-dose groups were significant in terms of locoregional control (hazard ratio, 0.32; CI, 0.18-0.59; P=<.001) and progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.51; CI, 0.32-0.82; P=.005). There was no statistical difference in acute and chronic treatment-related toxicities between the 2 groups. The outcome of residual bladder cancer after transurethral resection of bladder tumor could be improved by dose-escalated radiation therapy.

Updated evidence of primary tumor resection in stage IV breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: In stage IV breast cancer, surgical resection of the primary tumor was traditionally performed solely to palliate symptoms such as bleeding, infection, or pain. The ongoing discussion has shown that there are many research gaps in the current literature and differences in clinical practice. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis was designed to evaluate how primary tumor resection (PTR) affects the overall survival (OS) of patients with stage IV breast cancer. Method: A thorough literature search was completed using different databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Library) to find papers contrasting PTR with no PTR. The quality of research articles was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 Tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Review Manager 5.4 was used to determine how much demographic and clinical factors contribute to heterogeneity through subgroup and meta-regression analysis. Results: Data derived from 44 observational studies (OS) and four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including 227,889 patients were analyzed. Of all cases, 150,239 patients were included in the non-PTR group, and 70,795 patients in the PTR group (37 observational studies and 4 randomized control trials). The pooled outcomes of four RCT studies (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 1.03, 95%CI: 0.67-1.58; I 2 = 88%; P &lt; 0.0001; chi-square 24.57) favor non-PTR. While pooled outcomes of 43 observational studies showed PTR significantly improved OS (HR = 0.66, 95%CI: 0.61-0.71; I 2 = 87%; P &lt; 0.00001; chi-square 359.12). Additionally, subgroup analysis that compared PTR with non-PTR in patients with stage IV breast cancer for progression free-survival (HR = 0.89, 95%CI: 0.62-1.28; P = 0.03; I 2 = 71%) and locoregional progression-free survival (LPFS) (HR = 0.33, 95%CI: 0.14-0.74; P = 0.0004; I 2 = 87%) was found to be significant favoring the PTR group. Distant progression-free survival (DPFS) had a non-significant relationship (HR = 0.42, 95%CI: 0.29-0.60; P = 0.12; I 2 = 53%), while overall, there was a significant relationship (HR = 0.49, 95%CI: 0.32-0.75; P &lt; 0.00001; I 2 = 90%). Subgroup analysis revealed that PTR is beneficial in patients with bone metastasis (HR = 0.83, 95%CI: 0.68-1.01; P = 0.01; I 2 = 56%), with one metastatic site (HR = 0.75, 95%CI: 0.63-0.59; P = 0.006; I 2 = 62%), but not in patients with positive margins (HR = 0.84, 95%CI: 0.67-1.06; P = 0.07; I 2 = 61%), negative margins (HR = 0.61, 95%CI: 0.59-0.63, P = 1.00; I 2 = 0%). Most of the patients in PTR and non-PTR groups belonged to white compared to other ethnic groups. Overall, observational studies were of high quality, while RCTs were of low quality. Conclusion: The current research suggests that PTR may be discussed as a possible option.

Phase 2 Clinical Trial of Simultaneous Boost Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy With 3 Dose Gradients in Patients With Stage I-II Nasal Type Natural Killer/T-Cell Lymphoma: Long-Term Outcomes of Survival and Quality of Life

The aim of this study was to investigate the treatment results and long-term quality of life in patients with early-stage extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma who were prospectively treated with simultaneous boost intensity modulated radiation therapy (SIB-IMRT) with 3 dose gradients. Sixty patients with stage I-II nasal cavity natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (NKTCL) and Waldeyer's ring NKTCL were enrolled in a single-arm, prospective, phase 2 clinical trial from August 2011 to April 2015. All patients were treated with definitive radiation therapy combined with short-course induction chemotherapy. A newly designed SIB-IMRT scheme was uniformly adopted, with 54.6 Gy for the gross tumor volume (GTV) of the primary tumor and GTV of the positive lymph nodes, 50.7 Gy for the high-risk clinical target volume (CTV), and 45.5 Gy for the low-risk CTV, all delivered in 26 daily fractions. Before SIB-IMRT, L-asparaginase-based induction chemotherapy was used in 95.0% (57/60) of patients. With a median follow-up time of 95.8 months, the 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 83.3%, 81.7%, and 88.3%, respectively. Dosimetric analysis in the first 21 patients showed satisfying conformality for planning target volume of GTV, high-risk CTV, and low-risk CTV, while the organs at risk were well protected. The results of long-term quality-of-life investigations in patients without progression were favorable, and nasal discomfort was the most common symptom. No grade 3 or 4 acute or late toxicities were observed. The scheme of target volume delineation and dose setting that we designed has favorable clinical effects with mild side effects in treating patients with stage I-II nasal cavity NKTCL and Waldeyer's ring NKTCL.

Is radical radiotherapy with/without surgery an effective treatment in the lymphoepithelial carcinoma of the salivary gland？

BackgroundThere is limited information of radical radiotherapy (RT) on lymphoepithelial carcinoma of salivary gland (LECSG) regarding to the rarity of the disease. We conducted this retrospective study that evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of radical RT with/without surgery in LECSG.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients that were pathologically diagnosed of LECSG and had definite or suspicious residual disease. The prescribed dose given to P-GTV and/or P-GTV-LN was 66 to 70.4 Gy. The clinical target volume (CTV) involved ipsilateral salivary gland and corresponding lymph node drainage area.ResultsA total of 56 patients were included. With a median follow-up of 60 months (range: 8 to 151 months), the 1-, 5-, and 10-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 94.6%, 84.7% and 84.7%; locoregional progression-free survival (LRPFS) rates were 98.2%, 87.4% and 87.4%; distance metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates were 94.6%, 86.7% and 86.7%; and overall survival (OS) rates were 98.2%, 92.4% and 89.0%, respectively. A total of 7 patients without surgery were included. All patients were alive and only one patient experienced failure of distant metastasis four months after RT. The results of univariate analysis showed that compared with N stage, the number of positive lymph nodes (2 positive lymph nodes) was better prognostic predictor especially in PFS. There were no treatment-related deaths and most toxicities of RT were mild.ConclusionsRadical RT with/without surgery in LECSG for definite or suspicious residual disease is feasibility and efficacy. Most toxicities of RT were mild due to the target volume involved ipsilateral area.

Multitask Learning with Convolutional Neural Networks and Vision Transformers Can Improve Outcome Prediction for Head and Neck Cancer Patients.

Neural-network-based outcome predictions may enable further treatment personalization of patients with head and neck cancer. The development of neural networks can prove challenging when a limited number of cases is available. Therefore, we investigated whether multitask learning strategies, implemented through the simultaneous optimization of two distinct outcome objectives (multi-outcome) and combined with a tumor segmentation task, can lead to improved performance of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and vision transformers (ViTs). Model training was conducted on two distinct multicenter datasets for the endpoints loco-regional control (LRC) and progression-free survival (PFS), respectively. The first dataset consisted of pre-treatment computed tomography (CT) imaging for 290 patients and the second dataset contained combined positron emission tomography (PET)/CT data of 224 patients. Discriminative performance was assessed by the concordance index (C-index). Risk stratification was evaluated using log-rank tests. Across both datasets, CNN and ViT model ensembles achieved similar results. Multitask approaches showed favorable performance in most investigations. Multi-outcome CNN models trained with segmentation loss were identified as the optimal strategy across cohorts. On the PET/CT dataset, an ensemble of multi-outcome CNNs trained with segmentation loss achieved the best discrimination (C-index: 0.29, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.22-0.36) and successfully stratified patients into groups with low and high risk of disease progression (p=0.003). On the CT dataset, ensembles of multi-outcome CNNs and of single-outcome ViTs trained with segmentation loss performed best (C-index: 0.26 and 0.26, CI: 0.18-0.34 and 0.18-0.35, respectively), both with significant risk stratification for LRC in independent validation (p=0.002 and p=0.011). Further validation of the developed multitask-learning models is planned based on a prospective validation study, which has recently completed recruitment.

Pembrolizumab with Chemoradiation as Treatment for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Analysis of Safety and Efficacy of the PCR-MIB Phase 2 Clinical Trial (ANZUP 1502)

BackgroundRadiation may improve the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibition. This study investigates the combination of pembrolizumab and chemoradiation (CRT) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). ObjectiveTo assess the feasibility and safety of pembrolizumab combined with CRT for MIBC. Design, setting, and participantsA single-arm phase 2 trial was performed with 28 participants having cT2-T4aN0M0 MIBC (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–1; estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥40 ml/min; no contraindications to pembrolizumab) suitable for CRT. InterventionWhole bladder radiation therapy (RT; 64 Gy in 32 daily fractions, over 6.5 wk, combined with cisplatin (35 mg/m2 intravenously [IV] weekly, six doses) and pembrolizumab (200 mg IV q3 weeks, seven doses), both starting with RT. Surveillance cystoscopy/biopsy and computerised tomography scans performed 12 and 24 wk after CRT. Outcome measurements and statistical analysisThe primary endpoint was feasibility, determined by a prespecified satisfactory low rate of grade 3 or worse nonurinary toxicity or completion of planned CRT according to defined parameters. Secondary endpoints were complete cystoscopic response, locoregional progression-free survival (LRPFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS). Results and limitationsTwenty-eight patients were enrolled with a 31-mo median follow-up. Six had Grade >3 nonurinary adverse events during/within 12 wk after treatment; three had more than one cisplatin dose reduction. The 24-wk post-CRT complete response (CR) rate was 88%. Eight patients developed metastatic disease, and three had nonmetastatic progression. The DMFS at 2 yr is 78% (95% confidence interval [CI] 54–90%), with LRPFS at 2 yr of 87% (95% CI 64–96%) and median OS of 39 mo (95% CI 17.1–not evaluable). Limitations are the single-arm design and sample size. ConclusionsCombining pembrolizumab with CRT for MIBC was feasible, with manageable toxicity and promising CR rates. Patient summaryImmunotherapy treats nonmetastatic/metastatic bladder cancer effectively. We combined pembrolizumab with chemotherapy and radiation to assess its safety and impact on treatment delivery. The combination was feasible with encouraging early activity. Further larger trials are warranted.

Involved Site Radiotherapy in HPV Positive Oropharyngeal Cancer: Patterns of Failure Analysis Across Prospective De-Escalation Trials

HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancers (HPV+OPC) have a favorable prognosis with ongoing efforts to reduce long term toxicity while maintaining oncologic outcomes. One method under investigation includes lowering the elective radiation dose or in some cases omitting radiation to elective lymphatic nodal stations. Furthermore, pre-clinical evidence demonstrates that elective nodal irradiation blunts the anti-tumor immune response in head and neck cancer. This is a pooled secondary analysis reporting patterns of failure in patients (pts) with HPV+OPC enrolled on consecutive induction chemo- or chemoimmunotherapy (IC) based response-adaptive de-escalation trials and treated with involved-site radiotherapy (ISRT). Pts treated on two prospective phase II trials as well as on a prospective cohort registry were included for analysis. Pts with ≥ 50% response to IC based on RECIST 1.1 who received de-escalated definitive radiotherapy (RT) or concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) with ISRT were evaluable. Pts with locally advanced low risk or high-risk HPV+OPC (LR and HR, respectively) were eligible for enrollment. Pts were considered to have HR if at least one of the following criteria was met: T4 primary, N2c-N3 disease (AJCC 7th ed.), or > 10-20 pack years smoking. In the first trial, pts with ≥ 50% response to IC received RT to gross disease plus a 1.5 cm margin (PTV1) and to the next echelon of uninvolved nodes (PTV2). Pts with LR received 50 Gy in 2 Gy daily fractions without chemotherapy; pts with HR received 30 Gy in 1.5 Gy BID fractions to PTV2 with a 15 Gy sequential boost to PTV1 with CRT. In the subsequent trial, pts with ≥ 50% response received RT to PTV1 alone to 50 Gy in 2 Gy daily fractions; concurrent CRT was included if pts had HR. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method for progression free survival (PFS), locoregional PFS (LRPFS), and overall survival (OS). Patterns of failure analysis was performed by comparing RT plans to radiographic surveillance scans. Of 172 evaluable pts, 119 (69.2%) achieved a ≥ 50% response to IC and received definitive ISRT. 45 (37.8%) pts evaluated received RT to gross disease only plus margin without the next nodal echelon included. With a median follow up of 46 (IQR 34-65) months, 3-year PFS, LRPFS, and OS with their 95% confidence intervals were 96.2% (90.1-98.5%), 97.1% (91.1-99.0%), and 96.2% (90.3-98.6%), respectively. All locoregional failures were in-field and in the high dose region. No failures were observed in the RT omitted neck. This prospective experience demonstrates feasible volume de-escalation using IC response-based selection with progressively smaller elective volumes over time. Notably, despite a marked reduction in elective treatment volume, there were no regional out-of-field failures. IC may allow for selection of pts with favorable tumor biology and microscopic disease sterilization in the regional nodes. Further efforts at elective nodal de-escalation are needed.

Total ablative stereotactic body radiotherapy to primary and oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma in medically inoperable cases: An institutional analysis

ABSTRACT Introduction: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been found to be an effective and safe modality with excellent oncological outcome in medically inoperable primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and oligometastases. There is scarcity of data on the synchronous delivery of SBRT to primary and oligometastatic RCC in patients unfit for nephrectomy. Here, we report the findings of a retrospective study of prospectively collected data on “total ablative SBRT.” Methods: Oligometastatic RCC patients with intact primary tumors were enrolled between May 2021 and June 2022. SBRT was synchronously delivered to the primary tumor and metastases. Demographics, treatment, oncologic outcomes, and toxicity were assessed. Kaplan–Meier estimates were generated for oncologic outcomes. The primary endpoint of this study was feasibility and tolerability. Results: Eleven patients were enrolled between May 2021 and June 2022. One patient died at 2 months after SBRT due to viral pneumonitis (possibly COVID pneumonia). Nine patients (82%) had metastatic disease, while 2 (18%) were stage II. The average maximal diameter of primary was 68.7 mm (range, 23–128 mm). The SBRT doses for primary and metastasis ranged from 40 to 55 Gray (Gy) in 5 to 7 fractions and 22 to 40Gy in 2 to 5 fractions, respectively. The median follow-up period was 10.5 months (Range: 4–15 months). Response assessment was available for ten patients. Local control, marginal control, regional control and initial oligometastatic control (OMC) rates were 100%. OMC declined to 87.5% as one patient had recurrence in irradiated subcarinal lymphnode at 7 months. The metastatic control rate was 80% and loco-regional progression-free survival was 8 months (range, 4–15 months). Toxicities were minimal and manageable. At the last follow–up, 7 of 11 patients were alive with an overall survival of 63.5%. Six patients received systemic therapy after SBRT. Conclusions: Synchronous delivery of SBRT to primary and oligometastatic sites in patients unfit for nephrectomy was feasible and tolerable with good locoregional control. The total ablative SBRT strategy needs to be explored in similar cohorts.