Localization Of G Protein-coupled Receptors Research Articles

Compartmentalised cAMP signalling in the primary cilium.

cAMP is a universal second messenger that relies on precise spatio-temporal regulation to control varied, and often opposing, cellular functions. This is achieved via selective activation of effectors embedded in multiprotein complexes, or signalosomes, that reside at distinct subcellular locations. cAMP is also one of many pathways known to operate within the primary cilium. Dysfunction of ciliary signaling leads to a class of diseases known as ciliopathies. In Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD), a ciliopathy characterized by the formation of fluid-filled kidney cysts, upregulation of cAMP signaling is known to drive cystogenesis. For decades it has been debated whether the primary cilium is an independent cAMP sub-compartment, or whether it shares a diffusible pool of cAMP with the cell body. Recent studies now suggest it is a specific pool of cAMP generated in the cilium that propels cyst formation in ADPKD, supporting the notion that this antenna-like organelle is a compartment within which cAMP signaling occurs independently from cAMP signaling in the bulk cytosol. Here we present examples of cAMP function in the cilium which suggest this mysterious organelle is home to more than one cAMP signalosome. We review evidence that ciliary membrane localization of G-Protein Coupled Receptors (GPCRs) determines their downstream function and discuss how optogenetic tools have contributed to establish that cAMP generated in the primary cilium can drive cystogenesis.

Physiological Condition-Dependent Changes in Ciliary GPCR Localization in the Brain.

Primary cilia are cellular appendages critical for diverse types of Signaling. They are found on most cell types, including cells throughout the CNS. Cilia preferentially localize certain G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and are critical for mediating the signaling of these receptors. Several of these neuronal GPCRs have recognized roles in feeding behavior and energy homeostasis. Cell and model systems, such as Caenorhabditis elegans and Chlamydomonas, have implicated both dynamic GPCR cilia localization and cilia length and shape changes as key for signaling. It is unclear whether mammalian ciliary GPCRs use similar mechanisms in vivo and under what conditions these processes may occur. Here, we assess two neuronal cilia GPCRs, melanin-concentrating hormone receptor 1 (MCHR1) and neuropeptide-Y receptor 2 (NPY2R), as mammalian model ciliary receptors in the mouse brain. We test the hypothesis that dynamic localization to cilia occurs under physiological conditions associated with these GPCR functions. Both receptors are involved in feeding behaviors, and MCHR1 is also associated with sleep and reward. Cilia were analyzed with a computer-assisted approach allowing for unbiased and high-throughput analysis. We measured cilia frequency, length, and receptor occupancy. We observed changes in ciliary length, receptor occupancy, and cilia frequency under different conditions for one receptor but not another and in specific brain regions. These data suggest that dynamic cilia localization of GPCRs depends on properties of individual receptors and cells where they are expressed. A better understanding of subcellular localization dynamics of ciliary GPCRs could reveal unknown molecular mechanisms regulating behaviors like feeding.

Nuclear Location Bias of HCAR1 Drives Cancer Malignancy by Multiple Routes

IntroductionG‐Protein Coupled Receptors (GPCR) are virtually involved in all physiological processes. HCAR1 (GPR81), as a GPCR, is endogenously activated by lactate and has been shown to promote cancer malignancy via higher level of glycolysis due to Warburg effect. Its expression level is highly elevated in many cancers and negatively correlates with patient’s prognosis. However, its mechanism of action is not well understood.On the other hand, nuclear localization of several GPCRs have been described albeit it is unusual feature for them. Additionally, it has been shown that nuclear GPCRs can perform functions distinct from their cell surface counterparts in vivo. Here we demonstrate HCAR1 has a nuclear localization and this localization pattern promotes cancer malignancy by multiple routes.Methods and ResultsWe determined HCAR1 nuclear localization pattern by cell fractionation, immunofluorescence confocal imaging and TEM. Site‐directed mutagenesis showed ICL3 and phosphorylation of C‐terminal domains are required for nuclear localization. We also demonstrated that this localization is ligand independent and there is a pool of nuclear HCAR1 (N‐HCAR1) in the cells. We show N‐HCAR1 induces intra‐nuclear signaling through Gi and Gßγ by WB and ELISA leading to increased phosphorylation of nuclear AKT and ERK resulting in increased cancer cell survival and proliferation. Our ChIP‐sequencing data shows N‐HCAR1 binds to the genes regulating transcription and promoting expression of genes involved in cell migration and we validated this in cellulo proving N‐HCAR1 promotes migration. We identified N‐HCAR1 interactome by Bio‐ID coupled with mass spectrometry and found, it interacts with proteins involved in ribosome biogenesis, translation and DNA damage repair and our experimental data demonstrates that specifically the N‐HCAR1 promotes these three process in cellulo. Additionally, we identified the transcriptomic signature of N‐HCAR1 and showed it regulated a larger gene network than its plasma membrane counterpart. Concordantly, our in vivo tumor xenografts and tail vein injections proves that tumors without N‐HCAR1 have smaller size and tumor mass and lower metastatic rate as well.ConclusionHere we show an unusual localization of a GPCR in the nucleus and provide evidence that N‐HCAR1 specifically promotes various hallmarks of cancer malignancy. The effect of N‐HCAR1 is validate in vivo in tumor xenografts as well. Understanding these mechanisms can provide targets and cues for therapeutic developments.

Insights into the role of N‐linked glycosylation in directing plasma membrane localization of GPCRs expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Glycosylation is the biochemical process of the attachment of sugar moieties or carbohydrates to proteins during co‐translational or post‐translational modification (PTM). It is one of many types of protein modifications that naturally occurs during the process of protein expression in organisms like Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Baker’s yeast). For natively expressed proteins, glycosylation can be critical for proper protein processing and can also be important for the production of proteins in a stable and biologically active state. For proteins that are non‐natively, or heterologously, expressed in these organisms, glycosylation can lead to improper processing and ultimately produce proteins with little to no biological relevance. This proves to be an undesirable effect for the elucidation of protein structure. However, large quantities of protein are required for structural analysis, presenting a significant obstacle for structural biologists and those who use heterologous expression as a means to acquire large quantities of protein. This problem becomes significantly more challenging for membrane proteins.Membrane proteins are an elusive class of biomolecules that reside or closely associate with the lipid bilayers of cells and encompass transporters, receptors and channel pores, to name a few. They play an intrinsic role in maintaining proper cell function including signaling and selective uptake of extracellular ions and small molecules. G‐protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) constitute one of the largest groups of membrane proteins across the plant and animal kingdoms. Despite being of scientific and medical interest, GPCRs and many integral membrane proteins are notoriously difficult to isolate and work with because of their hydrophobicity, structural flexibility and instability in the absence of the cell membrane. Optimized experimental conditions often vary from protein to protein and necessitate a systematic approach to achieve. This typically requires labor and resource intensive efforts. The goal of this work is to uncover new insights into the role of post‐translational processing and protein localization in the cell. Using a combination of fluorescence microscopy and bioinformatics we formulated an approach to investigate the effects of N‐linked glycosylation on plasma membrane localization of GPCRs expressed in S. cerevisiae. We postulate a critical link between plasma membrane localization and expression of “ligand active” or structurally relevant GPCRs. Previous studies of the human adenosine A2A receptor (hA2AR) show it readily localizes to the plasma membrane during expression in yeast, while the human dopamine D2 receptor (hD2R) does not. A sequence comparison of the two reveals three putative N‐linked glycosylation sites at the N‐terminal extracellular region of hD2R which is lacking in hA2AR. Using a chimera of these two receptors prepared with a C‐terminal GFP tag, we show the chimera does not traffic to the plasma membrane similarly to full‐length hA2AR, suggesting N‐linked glycosylation strongly influences functional high‐level expression of GPCRs and possibly other membrane proteins in yeast.

Comparison of Ciliary Targeting of Two Rhodopsin-Like GPCRs: Role of C-Terminal Localization Sequences in Relation to Cilium Type.

Primary cilia exhibit a distinct complement of proteins, including G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that mediate sensory and developmental signals. The localization of GPCRs to the ciliary membrane involves ciliary localization sequences (CLSs), but it is not known how CLSs might relate to cilium type. Here, we studied the localization of two rhodopsin (RHO)-like GPCRs, somatostatin receptor (SSTR3) and RHO, in three types of cilia, from inner medullary collecting duct (IMCD3) cells, hTERT-RPE1 cells (possessing pocket cilia), and rod photoreceptors (whose cilia grow into elaborate phototransductive outer segments). SSTR3 was localized specifically to all three types of cilia, whereas RHO showed more selectivity for the photoreceptor cilium. Focusing on C-terminal CLSs, we characterized a novel CLS in the SSTR3 C terminus, which was required for the robust ciliary localization of SSTR3. Replacing the C terminus of RHO with this SSTR3 CLS-enhanced ciliary localization, compared with full-length RHO in IMCD3 and hTERT-RPE1 cells. Addition of the SSTR3 CLS to the single transmembrane protein CD8A enabled ciliary localization. In hTERT-RPE1 cells, a partial SSTR3 CLS added to CD8A effected specific localization to the periciliary (pocket) membrane, demonstrating C-terminal localization sequence targeting to this domain. Using retinas from mice, including both sexes, we show that deletion of the C terminus of RHO reduced the rod outer segment localization and that addition of the SSTR3 C-terminal CLS to the truncated RHO partly rescued this mislocalization. Overall, the study details elements of the different C termini of SSTR3 and RHO that are major effectors in determining specificity of cilium (or pericilium) localization among different types of cilia.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The localization of G-protein-coupled receptors to primary cilia is key to many types of signal transduction. After characterizing a novel C-terminal CLS in SSTR3, we investigated how SSTR3 and RHO localization to the cilium relates to C-terminal CLSs and to cilium type. We found that the SSTR3 C-terminal CLS was effective in three different types of cilia, but the RHO C terminus showed a clear localization preference for the highly elaborate photoreceptor cilium. When added to CD8A, part of the SSTR3 CLS promoted specific periciliary membrane localization in hTERT-RPE1 cells, demonstrating an effective CLS for this domain. Thus, we demonstrate that elements of the C termini of SSTR3 and RHO determine different localization patterns among different types of cilia.

HCAR1 Nuclear Location Bias Drives Cancer Malignancy by Multiple Routes

Introduction G-Protein Coupled Receptors (GPCR) are virtually involved in all physiological processes. HCAR1 (GPR81), as a GPCR, is endogenously activated by lactate and has been shown to promote cancer malignancy via higher level of glycolysis due to Warburg effect. Its expression level is highly elevated in many cancers and negatively correlates with patient's prognosis. However, its mechanism of action is not well understood. On the other hand, nuclear localization of several GPCRs have been described albeit it is unusual feature for them. Additionally, it has been shown that nuclear GPCRs can perform functions distinct from their cell surface counterparts in vivo. Here we demonstrate HCAR1 has a nuclear localization and this localization pattern promotes cancer malignancy by multiple routes. Methods and Results We determined HCAR1 nuclear localization pattern by cell fractionation, immunofluorescence confocal imaging and TEM. Site-directed mutagenesis showed ICL3 and phosphorylation of C-terminal domains are required for nuclear localization. We also demonstrated that this localization is ligand independent and there is a pool of nuclear HCAR1 (N-HCAR1) in the cells. We show N-HCAR1 induces intra-nuclear signaling through Gi and Gßγ by WB and ELISA leading to increased phosphorylation of nuclear ATK and ERK resulting in increased cancer cell survival and proliferation. Our ChIP-sequencing data shows N-HCAR1 binds to the genes regulating cell migration and we validated this in cellulo proving N-HCAR1 promotes migration. We identified N-HCAR1 interactome by Bio-ID coupled with mass spectrometry and found, it interacts with proteins involved in translation and DNA damage repair and our experimental data demonstrates that specifically the N-HCAR1 promotes both of those process in cellulo. Concordantly, our in vivo tumor xenografts and tail vein injections proves that tumors without N-HCAR1 have smaller size and tumor mass and lower metastatic rate as well. Conclusion Here we show an unusual localization of a GPCR in the nucleus and provide evidence that N-HCAR1 contributes to tumor malignancy by promoting classical GPCR signaling intra-nuclearly, directly regulating gene expression (opposed to signaling output) leading to increased cell migration, promoting translation and DNA damage repair, all hallmarks of cancer malignancy. The effect of N-HCAR1 is validate in vivo in tumor xenografts as well. Understanding these mechanisms can provide targets and cues for therapeutic developments.

Isolation of Lipid Rafts by the Detergent-Based and Non-detergent-Based Methods for Localization of GPCRs with Immunoblotting and Laser Scanning Confocal Microscopy.

The understanding of how biological membranes are organized and how they function has constantly been evolving over the past decades. Instead of just serving as a medium in which specific proteins are located, certain parts of the lipid bilayer contribute to platforms that assemble signaling complexes by providing a microenvironment that facilitates effective protein-protein interactions. G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and relevant signaling molecules, including the heterotrimeric G proteins, key enzymes such as kinases and phosphatases, trafficking proteins, and secondary messengers, preferentially partition to these highly organized cell membrane microdomains, called lipid rafts. Lipid rafts are essential for the trafficking and signaling of GPCRs. The study of GPCR biology in the context of lipid rafts involves the localization of the GPCR of interest in lipid rafts, at the basal state and upon receptor agonism, and the evaluation of the biological functions of the GPCR in appropriate cell lines. The lack of standardized methodologies to study lipid rafts, in general, and of the workings of GPCRs in lipid rafts, in particular, and the inescapable drawbacks of current methods have hampered the complete understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms. Newer methodologies that allow the study of GPCRs in their native form are needed. The use of complementary approaches that produce mutually supportive results appears to be the best way for drawing conclusions with regard to the distribution and activity of GPCRs in lipid rafts.

Domains of Activated GPCRs Mediated by Membrane Curvature

The existence of domains of G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), as well as the mechanisms that may lead to their formation, has been the subject of speculation and debate1,2. Here we demonstrate the existence of a novel domain-formation mechanism whereby coupling of receptor spontaneous curvature to the shape of cellular membranes can readily lead to the formation of receptor domains3. Since this mechanism relies on receptor conformation it spontaneously segregates different receptor conformational states. Consequently, the spatiotemporal characteristics and composition of such domains are regulated by effectors of receptor activation (ligands, proteins etc.). Furthermore, since the observed apparent domain size “replicates” the topographical features present in the cellular membrane, it is readily regulated by all conditions that affect membrane morphology in real time. These findings are consistent with previous findings from our lab demonstrating the preferential localization of GPCRs in highly curved filopodia4. We predict this fundamental biophysical mechanism to contribute to the localization of transmembrane proteins in general in a manner that is specific to their conformational landscape. 1Sungkaworn T. et al. Nature, 2017 2Zheng H. et al, PNAS 2008 3Iversen et al. Nat Chem Biol. 2015 4Rosholm et al. Nat Chem Biol. 2017

CaMello-XR enables visualization and optogenetic control of Gq/11 signals and receptor trafficking in GPCR-specific domains

The signal specificity of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) including serotonin receptors (5-HT-R) depends on the trafficking and localization of the GPCR within its subcellular signaling domain. Visualizing traffic-dependent GPCR signals in neurons is difficult, but important to understand the contribution of GPCRs to synaptic plasticity. We engineered CaMello (Ca2+-melanopsin-local-sensor) and CaMello-5HT2A for visualization of traffic-dependent Ca2+ signals in 5-HT2A-R domains. These constructs consist of the light-activated Gq/11 coupled melanopsin, mCherry and GCaMP6m for visualization of Ca2+ signals and receptor trafficking, and the 5-HT2A C-terminus for targeting into 5-HT2A-R domains. We show that the specific localization of the GPCR to its receptor domain drastically alters the dynamics and localization of the intracellular Ca2+ signals in different neuronal populations in vitro and in vivo. The CaMello method may be extended to every GPCR coupling to the Gq/11 pathway to help unravel new receptor-specific functions in respect to synaptic plasticity and GPCR localization.

RABL2 positively controls localization of GPCRs in mammalian primary cilia.

The primary cilium, a solitary protrusion from most mammalian cells, functions as a cell sensor by receiving extracellular signals through receptors and channels accumulated in the organelle. Certain G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) specifically localize to the membrane compartment of primary cilia. To gain insight into the mechanisms that regulate ciliary GPCR sorting, we investigated the atypical small GTPase RAB-like 2 (RABL2; herein referring to the near-identical human paralogs RABL2A and RABL2B). RABL2 recruitment to the mother centriole is dependent on the distal appendage proteins CEP164 and CEP83. We found that silencing of RABL2 causes mis-targeting of ciliary GPCRs, GPR161 and HTR6, whereas overexpression of RABL2 resulted in accumulation of these receptors in the organelle. Ablation of CEP19 and the intraflagellar transport B (IFT-B) complex, which interact with RABL2, also leads to mis-localization of GPR161. RABL2 controls localization of GPR161 independently of TULP3, which promotes entry of ciliary GPCRs. We further demonstrate that RABL2 physically associates with ciliary GPCRs. Taken together, these studies suggest that RABL2 plays an important role in trafficking of ciliary GPCRs at the ciliary base in mammalian cells.

Roles of NHERF Family of PDZ-Binding Proteins in Regulating GPCR Functions.

Multicellular organisms are equipped with an array of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that mediate cell-cell signaling allowing them to adapt to environmental cues and ultimately survive. This is mechanistically possible through complex intracellular GPCR machinery that encompasses a vast network of proteins. Within this network, there is a group called scaffolding proteins that facilitate proper localization of signaling proteins for a quick and robust GPCR response. One protein family within this scaffolding group is the PSD-95/Dlg/ZO-1 (PDZ) family which is important for GPCR localization, internalization, recycling, and downstream signaling. Although the PDZ family of proteins regulate the functions of several receptors, this chapter focuses on a subfamily within the PDZ protein family called the Na+/H+ exchanger regulatory factors (NHERFs). Here we extensively review the predominantly characterized roles of NHERFs in renal phosphate absorption, intestinal ion regulation, cancer progression, and immune cell functions. Finally, we discuss the future perspectives and possible clinical application of targeting NHERFs in several disorders.

Localization and signaling of GPCRs in lipid rafts.

The understanding of how biological membranes are organized and how they function has evolved. Instead of just serving as a medium in which certain proteins are found, portions of the lipid bilayer have been demonstrated to form specialized platforms that foster the assembly of signaling complexes by providing a microenvironment that is conducive for effective protein-protein interactions. G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and relevant signaling molecules, including the heterotrimeric G proteins, key enzymes such as kinases and phosphatases, trafficking proteins, and secondary messengers, preferentially partition to these highly organized cell membrane microdomains, called lipid rafts. As such, lipid rafts are crucial for the trafficking and signaling of GPCRs. The study of GPCR biology in the context of lipid rafts involves the localization of the GPCR of interest in lipid rafts, at the basal state and upon receptor agonism, and the evaluation of the biological functions of the GPCR in appropriate cell lines. The lack of standardized methodology to study lipid rafts, in general, and of the workings of GPCRs in lipid rafts, in particular, and the inherent drawbacks of current methods have hampered the complete understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms. Newer methodologies that allow the study of GPCRs in their native form are needed. The use of complementary approaches that produce mutually supportive results appear to be the best way for drawing conclusions with regards to the distribution and activity of GPCRs in lipid rafts.

Identification of G Protein-Coupled Receptors (GPCRs) in Primary Cilia and Their Possible Involvement in Body Weight Control.

Primary cilia are sensory organelles that harbor various receptors such as G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). We analyzed subcellular localization of 138 non-odorant GPCRs. We transfected GPCR expression vectors into NIH3T3 cells, induced ciliogenesis by serum starvation, and observed subcellular localization of GPCRs by immunofluorescent staining. We found that several GPCRs whose ligands are involved in feeding behavior, including prolactin-releasing hormone receptor (PRLHR), neuropeptide FF receptor 1 (NPFFR1), and neuromedin U receptor 1 (NMUR1), localized to the primary cilia. In addition, we found that a short form of dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2S) is efficiently transported to the primary cilia, while a long form of dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2L) is rarely transported to the primary cilia. Using an anti-Prlhr antibody, we found that Prlhr localized to the cilia on the surface of the third ventricle in the vicinity of the hypothalamic periventricular nucleus. We generated the Npy2r-Cre transgenic mouse line in which Cre-recombinase is expressed under the control of the promoter of Npy2r encoding a ciliary GPCR. By mating Npy2r-Cre mice with Ift80 flox mice, we generated Ift80 conditional knockout (CKO) mice in which Npy2r-positive cilia were diminished in number. We found that Ift80 CKO mice exhibited a body weight increase. Our results suggest that Npy2r-positive cilia are important for body weight control.

Microtubules Shape GPCR Spatiotemporal Membrane Organization and Function by Scaffolding Cortical Signaling Hubs

G-protein coupled receptors (GPCR) activity is precisely regulated in space and time, however the exact molecular mechanisms regulating GPCR localization within the plasma membrane are still poorly defined. Combining single receptor tracking and a diffusion state classification method together with imaging of early downstream signaling events, we explored the activity of two GPCR subtypes, the prostanoid EP2 and EP4 receptors. Although both receptors trigger the Gαs-cAMP pathway, we found that EP4-mediated cAMP production is stronger but transient, whereas EP2 induces shallow but continuous cAMP levels. This is structured by the dynamic localization of slowly diffusing EP4, but not EP2, in elongated areas of the cell membrane that are templated by the underlying cortical microtubule network and allow EP4 to interact with its downstream interactors. These results reveal a new paradigm of dynamic plasma membrane organization based on sub-membraneous microtubules that scaffold hubs for GPCR signaling initiation and attenuation.

Diverse Cell Type-Specific Mechanisms Localize G Protein-Coupled Receptors to Caenorhabditis elegans Sensory Cilia

The localization of signaling molecules such as G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to primary cilia is essential for correct signal transduction. Detailed studies over the past decade have begun to elucidate the diverse sequences and trafficking mechanisms that sort and transport GPCRs to the ciliary compartment. However, a systematic analysis of the pathways required for ciliary targeting of multiple GPCRs in different cell types in vivo has not been reported. Here we describe the sequences and proteins required to localize GPCRs to the cilia of the AWB and ASK sensory neuron types in Caenorhabditis elegans. We find that GPCRs expressed in AWB or ASK utilize conserved and novel sequences for ciliary localization, and that the requirement for a ciliary targeting sequence in a given GPCR is different in different neuron types. Consistent with the presence of multiple ciliary targeting sequences, we identify diverse proteins required for ciliary localization of individual GPCRs in AWB and ASK. In particular, we show that the TUB-1 Tubby protein is required for ciliary localization of a subset of GPCRs, implying that defects in GPCR localization may be causal to the metabolic phenotypes of tub-1 mutants. Together, our results describe a remarkable complexity of mechanisms that act in a protein- and cell-specific manner to localize GPCRs to cilia, and suggest that this diversity allows for precise regulation of GPCR-mediated signaling as a function of external and internal context.

Cannabinoid receptor trafficking in peripheral cells is dynamically regulated by a binary biochemical switch

The cannabinoid G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) CB1 and CB2 are expressed in different peripheral cells. Localization of GPCRs in the cell membrane determines signaling via G protein pathways. Here we show that unlike in transfected cells, CB receptors in cell lines and primary human cells are not internalized upon agonist interaction, but move between cytoplasm and cell membranes by ligand-independent trafficking mechanisms. Even though CB receptors are expressed in many cells of peripheral origin they are not always localized in the cell membrane and in most cancer cell lines the ratios between CB1 and CB2 receptor gene and surface expression vary significantly. In contrast, CB receptor cell surface expression in HL60 cells is subject to significant oscillations and CB2 receptors form oligomers and heterodimers with CB1 receptors, showing synchronized surface expression, localization and trafficking. We show that hydrogen peroxide and other nonspecific protein tyrosine phosphatase inhibitors (TPIs) such as phenylarsine oxide trigger both CB2 receptor internalization and externalization, depending on receptor localization. Phorbol ester-mediated internalization of CB receptors can be inhibited via this switch. In primary human immune cells hydrogen peroxide and other TPIs lead to a robust internalization of CB receptors in monocytes and an externalization in T cells. This study describes, for the first time, the dynamic nature of CB receptor trafficking in the context of a biochemical switch, which may have implications for studies on the cell-type specific effects of cannabinoids and our understanding of the regulation of CB receptor cell surface expression.

TULP3 bridges the IFT-A complex and membrane phosphoinositides to promote trafficking of G protein-coupled receptors into primary cilia

Primary cilia function as a sensory signaling compartment in processes ranging from mammalian Hedgehog signaling to neuronal control of obesity. Intraflagellar transport (IFT) is an ancient, conserved mechanism required to assemble cilia and for trafficking within cilia. The link between IFT, sensory signaling, and obesity is not clearly defined, but some novel monogenic obesity disorders may be linked to ciliary defects. The tubby mouse, which presents with adult-onset obesity, arises from mutation in the Tub gene. The tubby-like proteins comprise a related family of poorly understood proteins with roles in neural development and function. We find that specific Tubby family proteins, notably Tubby-like protein 3 (TULP3), bind to the IFT-A complex. IFT-A is linked to retrograde ciliary transport, but, surprisingly, we find that the IFT-A complex has a second role directing ciliary entry of TULP3. TULP3 and IFT-A, in turn, promote trafficking of a subset of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), but not Smoothened, to cilia. Both IFT-A and membrane phosphoinositide-binding properties of TULP3 are required for ciliary GPCR localization. TULP3 and IFT-A proteins both negatively regulate Hedgehog signaling in the mouse embryo, and the TULP3-IFT-A interaction suggests how these proteins cooperate during neural tube patterning.

Spatial organization of transmembrane receptor signalling

The spatial organization of transmembrane receptors is a critical step in signal transduction and receptor trafficking in cells. Transmembrane receptors engage in lateral homotypic and heterotypic cis-interactions as well as intercellular trans-interactions that result in the formation of signalling foci for the initiation of different signalling networks. Several aspects of ligand-induced receptor clustering and association with signalling proteins are also influenced by the lipid composition of membranes. Thus, lipid microdomains have a function in tuning the activity of many transmembrane receptors by positively or negatively affecting receptor clustering and signal transduction. We review the current knowledge about the functions of clustering of transmembrane receptors and lipid-protein interactions important for the spatial organization of signalling at the membrane.

Lipid Raft-Mediated Regulation of G-Protein Coupled Receptor Signaling by Ligands which Influence Receptor Dimerization: A Computational Study

G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest family of cell surface receptors; they activate heterotrimeric G-proteins in response to ligand stimulation. Although many GPCRs have been shown to form homo- and/or heterodimers on the cell membrane, the purpose of this dimerization is not known. Recent research has shown that receptor dimerization may have a role in organization of receptors on the cell surface. In addition, microdomains on the cell membrane termed lipid rafts have been shown to play a role in GPCR localization. Using a combination of stochastic (Monte Carlo) and deterministic modeling, we propose a novel mechanism for lipid raft partitioning of GPCRs based on reversible dimerization of receptors and then demonstrate that such localization can affect GPCR signaling. Modeling results are consistent with a variety of experimental data indicating that lipid rafts have a role in amplification or attenuation of G-protein signaling. Thus our work suggests a new mechanism by which dimerization-inducing or inhibiting characteristics of ligands can influence GPCR signaling by controlling receptor organization on the cell membrane.

Signalosomes: delivering cardioprotective signals from GPCRs to mitochondria

Signalosomes: delivering cardioprotective signals from GPCRs to mitochondria