Local Recurrence-free Survival Research Articles

Value of the three-dimensional visualization ablation planning system in ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for malignant adrenal tumors: A clinical comparative study.

We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the three-dimensional visualization ablation planning system (3DVAPS) in ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation (US-PMWA) for malignant adrenal tumors (MATs). A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of 62 unilateral MAT cases from March 2011 to November 2022. There were a total of 62 lesions, with a mean maximum diameter of 5.4 ± 2.7 cm (range, 1.4-15.7 cm). The patients were categorized into the following, based on the pre-operative planning method: 3D planning (n = 32) and 2D planning (n = 30) groups. A comparative analysis was performed on various parameters, including ablation techniques, tumor-related prognosis, and incidence of complications. This analysis encompassed indicators, such as overall survival (OS) rate and local tumor progression (LTP), among others. The median follow-up period was 30 months (range, 3-84 months). Notably, compared with the 2D planning group, the 3D planning group exhibited significant disparities in the number of punctures (P = 0.035) and incidence of complications (P = 0.029) and had no significant difference in the OS (P > 0.05) but had a significantly lower LTP rate (6.2% vs. 23.3%, P = 0.033). In the 3D planning group, the sub-group with a tumor diameter of < 5 cm exhibited a significantly less number of punctures (P = 0.039), lower input energy (P = 0.002), and a shorter ablation time (P = 0.001), compared with the sub-group with a tumor diameter of ≥ 5 cm, but there was no significant difference in the LTP and OS rates between the two sub-groups (P > 0.05). The use of 3DVAPS in US-PMWA of MATs was advantageous, especially in lesions with a diameter of ≥ 5 cm. It can help in developing more rational surgical plans, reducing the incidence of complications, and extending the local recurrence-free survival time of patients and can add a certain value for precise treatment and expand the indications for ablation.

Long-term follow-up of protective effects on salivary and swallowing structures and improvement of late xerostomia and dysphagia by level IIb optimisation in clinical target volume of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

This study aimed to assess the long-term effect of level IIb clinical target volume (CTV) optimisation on survival, xerostomia, and dysphagia in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Clinical data of 415 patients with NPC treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy between December 2014 and October 2018 were retrospectively analysed. The patients were categorised into modified and comparison groups. Late xerostomia and dysphagia were evaluated using Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer scoring. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences in late toxicity and dose parameters between both groups were compared. Prognostic factors for survival and late toxicity were assessed using regression analyses. Patients in the modified group developed late xerostomia and dysphagia less frequently than those in the comparison group did (P < 0.001). The mean dose (Dmean) and V26 of parotid glands; Dmean and V39 of submandibular glands; and Dmean of sublingual glands, oral cavity, larynx, and superior, middle, and lower pharyngeal constrictor muscles were lower in the modified group than those in the comparison group (all P < 0.001). Both groups had no significant differences in overall, local recurrence-free, distant metastasis-free, or progression-free survival. The Dmean of the parotid and sublingual glands was a risk factor for xerostomia. The Dmean of the parotid and sublingual glands and middle pharyngeal constrictor muscle was a risk factor for dysphagia. Level IIb optimisation in NPC patients who meet certain criteria specially the exclusion of positive retropharyngeal nodes treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy has the potential to better protect the salivary and swallowing structures, decreasing the development of late radiation-induced xerostomia and dysphagia while maintaining long-term survival.

Conventional versus Hepatic Arteriography and C-Arm CT-Guided Ablation of Liver Tumors (HepACAGA): A Comparative Analysis.

Hepatic Arteriography and C-Arm CT-Guided Ablation of liver tumors (HepACAGA) is a novel technique, combining hepatic-arterial contrast injection with C-arm CT-guided navigation. This study compared the outcomes of the HepACAGA technique with patients treated with conventional ultrasound (US) and/or CT-guided ablation. In this retrospective cohort study, all consecutive patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) treated with conventional US-/CT-guided ablation between 1 January 2015, and 31 December 2020, and patients treated with HepACAGA between 1 January 2021, and 31 October 2023, were included. The primary outcome was local tumor recurrence-free survival (LTRFS). Secondary outcomes included the local tumor recurrence (LTR) rate and complication rate. 68 patients (120 tumors) were included in the HepACAGA cohort and 53 patients (78 tumors) were included in the conventional cohort. In both cohorts, HCC was the predominant tumor type (63% and 73%, respectively). In the HepACAGA cohort, all patients received microwave ablation. Radiofrequency ablation was the main ablation technique in the conventional group (78%). LTRFS was significantly longer for patients treated with the HepACAGA technique (p = 0.015). Both LTR and the complication rate were significantly lower in the HepACAGA cohort compared to the conventional cohort (LTR 5% vs. 26%, respectively; p < 0.001) (complication rate 4% vs. 15%, respectively; p = 0.041). In this study, the HepACAGA technique was safer and more effective than conventional ablation for HCC and CRLM, resulting in lower rates of local tumor recurrence, longer local tumor recurrence-free survival and fewer procedure-related complications.

Prospective phase II trial of preoperative hypofractionated proton therapy for extremity and truncal soft tissue sarcoma: the PRONTO study rationale and design

BackgroundOncologic surgical resection is the standard of care for extremity and truncal soft tissue sarcoma (STS), often accompanied by the addition of pre- or postoperative radiation therapy (RT). Preoperative RT may decrease the risk of joint stiffness and fibrosis at the cost of higher rates of wound complications. Hypofractionated, preoperative RT has been shown to provide acceptable outcomes in prospective trials. Proton beam therapy (PBT) provides the means to decrease dose to surrounding organs at risk, such as the skin, bone, soft tissues, and adjacent joint(s), and has not yet been studied in patients with extremity and truncal sarcoma.MethodsOur study titled “PROspective phase II trial of preoperative hypofractionated protoN therapy for extremity and Truncal soft tissue sarcOma (PRONTO)” is a non-randomized, prospective phase II trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of preoperative, hypofractionated PBT for patients with STS of the extremity and trunk planned for surgical resection. Adult patients with Eastern Cooperative Group Performance Status ≤ 2 with resectable extremity and truncal STS will be included, with the aim to accrue 40 patients. Treatment will consist of 30 Gy radiobiological equivalent of PBT in 5 fractions delivered every other day, followed by surgical resection 2–12 weeks later. The primary outcome is rate of major wound complications as defined according to the National Cancer Institute of Canada Sarcoma2 (NCIC-SR2) Multicenter Trial. Secondary objectives include rate of late grade ≥ 2 toxicity, local recurrence-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival at 1- and 2-years, functional outcomes, quality of life, and pathologic response.DiscussionPRONTO represents the first trial evaluating the use of hypofractionated PBT for STS. We aim to prove the safety and efficacy of this approach and to compare our results to historical outcomes established by previous trials. Given the low number of proton centers and limited availability, the short course of PBT may provide the opportunity to treat patients who would otherwise be limited when treating with daily RT over several weeks. We hope that this trial will lead to increased referral patterns, offer benefits towards patient convenience and clinic workflow efficiency, and provide evidence supporting the use of PBT in this setting.Trial registration: NCT05917301 (registered 23/6/2023).

Significance of lateral lymph node dissection in squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal: a retrospective cohort study.

The JCOG (Japan Clinical Oncology Group) 0212 study did not confirm the noninferiority of mesorectal excision (ME) alone to ME with LLND for rectal or anal adenocarcinomas. Furthermore, the significance of LLND for SCCs remains unknown. We evaluated the significance of lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the anal canal. This retrospective cohort study was conducted in 435 patients with SCCs among 1,781 patients with anal canal tumors. In 40 patients who underwent LLND, the 5-year relapse-free survival (5y-RFS) and 5-year overall survival (5y-OS) were compared between groups with positive and negative histopathological findings. In 71 patients with negative lateral lymph node metastasis in the preoperative diagnosis, the 5y-RFS, 5y-OS, and 5-year local recurrence-free survival were compared between patients who did and did not undergo LLND. The clinical and pathological T stages predicted pathological lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis. There was no statistically significant difference in 5y-RFS and 5y-OS between patients who did and did not undergo LLND. Among patients who underwent LLND, 5y-RFS in those with positive histopathological findings (15.0%) was worse than that in those without (59.2%) (p = 0.002). In patients who underwent LLND, 5y-RFS in those with positive histopathological findings than in those without LLND did not contribute to prognosis.

Unplanned Resections of Soft Tissue Sarcomas-Necessity of Re-Resection?

In soft tissue sarcomas, unplanned resections, or so-called Whoops procedures, do occur quite frequently, thus primarily owing to the abundant presence of benign lesions. Whether re-resection reduces local recurrence or improves overall survival remains a topic of ongoing debate. The principle objective of this study was to analyze the outcomes of patients with soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities or trunk wall after an incidental marginal resection by comparing re-resections to individuals who declined the procedure. A total of 185 patients who underwent unplanned resection were included. These patients were stratified into two groups: Group A (n = 156) underwent re-excision, while Group B (n = 29) was treated conservatively. Depending on the clinical scenario, radio- or chemotherapy was either administered in a neoadjuvant or an adjuvant setting. The presence of residual tumor and metastatic disease was documented. Clinical outcomes, specifically local recurrence (LR), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS), were utilized for evaluation. Group B exhibited significantly larger tumors (p < 0.0001) and a higher mean age than Group A. Among the patients in Group A, 11 (5.9%) had contaminated resection margins (R1), and residual disease (RD) was observed in 93 (59.6%) of the resected specimens. In group B, 10 patients received adjuvant radiotherapy alone, 5 received chemotherapy alone, and 13 underwent a combined approach consisting of both radio- and chemotherapy. In Group A, 8% (n = 12) of the patients developed local recurrence (LR) during the observation period. Conversely, in Group B, this amount was 14% (n = 4) (n.s.). Of the 12 LR in Group A, 10 were found in the subgroup with residual disease. Overall survival and local recurrence-free survival were not significantly different between the groups. A total of 15% (n = 24) of the patients in Group A developed metastatic disease, while 10% (n = 3) in Group B developed metastatic disease (n.s.). Following the reresection of unplanned resected STS, there was no statistically significant difference observed in overall survival or LR compared to patients who did not undergo re-resection. However, within the subgroup of patients with residual disease in the re-resected specimen, the OS was compromised, and the LR rate was higher. Particularly for low-grade lesions, adopting a more conservative approach seems to be justified.

Robotic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a cumulative sum analysis for the learning curve.

This study aimed to assess the learning curve of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 89 patients who underwent robot-assisted intersphincteric resection. All surgeries were performed by the same group of surgeons at our institution between June 2016 and April 2021. The learning curve was evaluated using a cumulative sum analysis and the best-fit curve. The different stages of the learning curve were compared based on patient characteristics and short-term clinical outcomes to evaluate their impact on clinical efficacy. The minimum number of cases required to overcome the learning curve was 47. The learning curve was divided into the learning improvement and proficiency stages. Significant differences were observed in the operation time and the number of lymph nodes between the two stages (P < 0.05), whereas no significant differences were found in intraoperative blood loss, first postoperative exhaust time, postoperative complications, 3-year progression-free survival, overall survival, and local recurrence-free survival (P > 0.05). Robotic-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer exhibits a learning curve that can be divided into two stages: namely, learning improvement and proficiency. Achieving proficiency requires a minimum of 47 surgical cases.

Effect of young age (below 40 years) on oncologic outcomes in Lebanese patients with breast cancer: a matched cohort study

BackgroundDeveloping countries have a significantly higher incidence of breast cancer in patients younger than 40 years as compared to developed countries. This study aimed to examine if young age at diagnosis is an independent prognostic factor for worse survival outcomes in breast cancer as well as the effect of age on Disease-free survival (DFS) and local recurrence free survival (LRFS) after adjusting for various tumor characteristics, local and systemic treatments.MethodsThis is a secondary analysis of prospective cohort of patients from two existing databases. We identified patients with breast cancer aged 40 years or less and we matched them to those older than 40 years. We also matched based on stage and molecular subtypes. In cohort 1, we matched at a ratio of 1:1, while in cohort 2 we matched at a ratio of 1:3.ResultsIn cohort 1, Disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years was significantly shorter for those younger than 40 years (75.6% and 92.7% respectively; p < 0.03). On multivariate analysis, only chemotherapy was found to be significant, while age was not found to be an independent predictor of prognosis. Local recurrence free survival at 5 years was similar between both age categories. Only hormonal therapy is a significant predictor for LRFS at 5 years. In the second cohort, DFS and LRFS at 3 years were similar between those younger and those older than 40 years. On multivariate analysis, no factor including age was found to be an independent predictor of prognosis.ConclusionData in the literature is controversial on the effect of young age on breast cancer prognosis. Our findings could not demonstrate that age is an independent prognostic factor in our population. There is a need for outcomes from larger, prospective series that have longer follow-ups and more data from our region.

Predictive value of FCGBP expression for treatment response and survival in rectal cancer patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy.

Despite neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) being the established standard for treating advanced rectal cancer, clinical outcomes remain suboptimal, necessitating the identification of predictive biomarkers for improved treatment decisions. Previous studies have hinted at the oncogenic properties of the Fc fragment of IgG binding protein (FCGBP) in various cancers; however, its clinical significance in rectal cancer remains unclear. In this study, we first conducted an analysis of a public transcriptome comprising 46 rectal cancer patients. Focusing on cell adhesion during data mining, we identified FCGBP as the most upregulated gene associated with CRT resistance. Subsequently, we assessed FCGBP immunointensity using immunohistochemical staining on 343 rectal cancer tissue blocks. Elevated FCGBP immunointensity correlated with lymph node involvement before treatment (p = 0.001), tumor invasion, and lymph node involvement after treatment (both p < 0.001), vascular invasion (p = 0.001), perineural invasion (p = 0.041), and reduced tumor regression (p < 0.001). Univariate analysis revealed a significant association between high FCGBP immunoexpression and inferior disease-specific survival, local recurrence-free survival, and metastasis-free survival (all p ≤ 0.0002). Furthermore, high FCGBP immunoexpression independently emerged as an unfavorable prognostic factor for all three survival outcomes in the multivariate analysis (all p ≤ 0.025). Enriched pathway analysis substantiated the role of FCGBP in conferring resistance to radiation. In summary, our findings suggest that elevated FCGBP immunoexpression in rectal cancer significantly correlates with a poor response to CRT and diminished patient survival. FCGBP holds promise as a valuable prognostic biomarker for rectal cancer patients undergoing CRT.

Abstract PO1-17-01: Surgical Margins and prognosis of borderline and malignant phyllodes tumors of breast

Abstract Background. To determine the appropriate surgical margin and identify predictive factors for recurrence and prognosis of borderline and malignant phyllodes tumor (PT) of the breast. Methods. A retrospective review of patients with borderline and malignant PT treated from March 2011 to December 2022 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University were conducted. The main endpoints of this research were local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine the impacts of different variables on LRFS and DFS, and to calculate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results. Of 155 patients with phyllodes tumors, 87 (56.1%) were classified as borderline while 68 (43.9%) were malignant. All patients included underwent operation, with a median age of 47 years (range,12-66 years) and a median tumor size of 60 mm (range,15-300 mm). Initial surgical margins &amp;lt; 1cm in 72 (46.5%) patients, of which 28 (38.9%) underwent reoperation, resulting in 45 (28.4%) patients with a margin &amp;lt; 1cm and 111 (71.6%) patients with a margin ≥1cm. At a median follow-up period of 66 months (range 3-146 months), local recurrence was observed in 36 patients (23.2%), and distant metastasis occurred in 10 patients (6.5%). In this cohort, the rates of 5-year LRFS was significantly higher in the surgical margin ≥1 cm group than in the surgical margin &amp;lt; 1 cm group (83.8% vs 50.4%, log-rank P&amp;lt; 0.001), both for the borderline (log-rank P=0.010) and the malignant PT (log-rank P&amp;lt; 0.001).Similarly, for both borderline (log-rank P=0.019) and malignant PT (log-rank P&amp;lt; 0.001), the rates of 5-year DFS was significantly higher in the surgical margin ≥1 cm group than in the surgical margin &amp;lt; 1 cm group (80.3% vs 47.5%, log-rank P=0.002). For 72 patients with the initial margin &amp;lt; 1 cm, 5-year DFS for undergoing reoperation to achieve a margin ≥1 cm and remaining with a margin &amp;lt; 1 cm were84.1% and 47.5%, respectively (P=0.008). In univariate analysis of the entire cohort, age, fibroadenoma surgery history, surgical methods, and surgical margins emerged as predictive factors for LRFS (P=0,003, 0.019, 0.026, and0.001, respectively), whereas age, reproductive history, fibroadenoma surgery history, tumor size and surgical margins were predictors of DFS (P= 0,011, 0.025, 0.039, 0.022, and0.002, respectively).In multivariate analysis, age&amp;lt; 45 years (HR=2.186, 95%CI:1.105-4.328, P=0.025)and surgical margins&amp;lt; 1cm (HR=2.181, 95%CI:1.021-4.659, P=0.044) were independent risk factors of LRFS. Independent risk factors for DFS included tumor size&amp;gt;5cm (HR=2.265, 95%CI:1.113-4.606, P=0.024) and surgical margins &amp;lt; 1cm (HR=2.689, 95%CI:1.438-5.027, P=0.002). Conclusion. For borderline and malignant PT, surgical margins of at least 1 cm should be achieved for a better prognosis. Patients aged &amp;lt; 45 years with a high risk of local recurrence and larger tumor patients with poor prognosis, multiple therapy modalities may be required for these high-risk patients. Survival curves for impact of variables on LRFS and DFS Table 1 Univariate and multivariate analysis of LRFS of PTs of the breast (n=155) Table 2 Univariate and multivariate analysis of DFS of PTs of the breast (n=155) Citation Format: lu Gan, Jialin Su. Surgical Margins and prognosis of borderline and malignant phyllodes tumors of breast [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-17-01.

Abstract PO5-02-08: Prognostic value of serum lipid levels in breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A retrospective exploratory analysis of the prospective cohort

Abstract 【Background】 Lipid metabolism is one of the most conspicuous metabolic changes in malignant tumors. Previous studies confirmed that higher levels of “adverse lipids” might lead to poor outcomes and lipid-lowering drugs could act as a protective role in improving the prognosis of breast cancer patients. Nevertheless, few studies have clarified the impact of serum lipid levels and their changes on the tumor prognosis. Particularly for breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, little has been studied whether their lipid levels or changes during neoadjuvant chemotherapy can serve as a valid prognostic factor. 【Methods】This study enrolled patients who received surgical treatment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in Renji Hospital from March 2016 to December 2020. Patients were included if they were female aged 18 years or older; had pathologically confirmed unilateral invasive breast cancer; had tumor of at least 2cm in size without distant metastasis (T1-4, N0-3, M0); and underwent radical surgery for breast cancer successfully after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We retrospectively gathered the baseline clinicopathological information and lipid metabolism-related biomarkers from electronic medical records. The study endpoints were disease free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), relapse free survival (RFS), distance recurrence free survival (DRFS), and local recurrence free survival (LRFS). The prognostic value of each lipid levels and their variation levels were systematically evaluated and the importance of lipid biomarkers were ranked by Random Forest. 【Results】 The baseline clinicopathological information and lipid metabolism biomarkers were available from 200 eligible patients. As of the last follow-up in March 2023, 11 patients died, 24 experienced DFS events and 20 underwent RFS events. It showed no significant correlations of lipid levels before (baseline) and after (preoperative) neoadjuvant chemotherapy with any survival outcome. However, we found that the relative increase of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) led to poorer DFS (P=0.003), RFS (P=0.01), DRFS (P=0.01), and LRFS (P=0.0039), meanwhile the relative increase of total cholesterol (TC) and non-high-density lipoprotein (NHDL) during neoadjuvant period was significantly related to the worse prognosis (TC, DFS P=0.0084; NHDL, DFS P=0.031, RFS P=0.009) as well. After adjusted by multiple factors, the adverse impacts of increasing TC (DFS P=0.005; RFS P=0.026), LDL (DFS P=0.004; RFS P=0.006) and NHDL (DFS P=0.032; RFS P=0.014) on DFS or RFS were still maintained. The results of Random Forest revealed that LDL changes and Body Mass Index (BMI) ranked higher in terms of predicting survival outcomes. Based on these data, BMI &amp;gt;25.4 kg/m2 or LDL elevation &amp;gt;0.54 mmol/L were defined as High-risk Lipid Metabolism (HLM), while BMI ≤ 25.4 kg/m2 and LDL elevation ≤ 0.54 mmol/L were regarded as Low-risk Lipid Metabolism (LLM). Compared to LLM, HLM had a worse OS (P=0.026), DFS (P=0.0011) and RFS (P=0.0011). 【Conclusion】Our study demonstrated that the relative elevation of LDL, TC and NHDL levels during neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an independent prognostic risk factor for breast cancer patients. It was also the first time to propose the concept of high-risk lipid metabolism (HLM). 【keywords】Breast cancer, Lipid metabolism, Low-density lipoprotein (LDL), Body Mass Index (BMI), Prognosis. Citation Format: Xinru Chen, Wenjin Yin, Yingying Zhao, Jinsong Lu. Prognostic value of serum lipid levels in breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A retrospective exploratory analysis of the prospective cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-02-08.

Abstract PO4-19-10: Selective Avoidance of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy In HER-2 Positive/Triple Negative Breast Cancer Patients With Excellent Radiologic Response to the Breast and Axilla

Abstract Background Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for breast cancer (BC) is downstaging inoperable tumors into operable tumors and de-escalating breast/axillary surgery. According to advanced NACT, dual human epidermal growth factor-2 (HER2) blockage in HER2-positive BC, carboplatin, and immunotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) revealed pathologic complete response (ypCR) rates of up to 68% and 80%, the indications for NACT have expanded to early BC and the expected ypCR rate has increased. Therefore, it may be reasonable to consider omitting surgery in cases with excellent responses to NACT. Although sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is minimally invasive, some patients still experience complications such as lymphedema, pain, sensory loss, and axillary web syndrome. Several recent retrospective studies and pilot prospective studies have reported axillary pathologic complete response (ApCR) is highly correlated with breast pathologic complete response (BpCR). In cN0 with HER2+ BC and TNBC, the ApCR rate in BpCR after NACT was reported up to 100%, and in cN1 with HER2+ BC and TNBC, the ApCR rate in BpCR after NACT was reported about 85%. There are many studies predicting BpCR using radiologic imaging such as breast mammography (MMG), ultrasonography (USG), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, the combination of tri-modality (MMG, USG, MRI) could not confirm BpCR. The current study is screened in cT1-3N0-1M0, HER2+ or TNBC, and planned breast-conserving surgery (BCS) patients after NACT with excellent response at the combination of tri-modality imaging (breast MMG, breast USG, breast MRI) and with expected BpCR at physical examination. Methods Trial design The ASLAN trial is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, clinical study. The five tertiary care hospitals in South Korea are participating which are members of the Korean Breast Cancer Study Group (KBCSG). Eligibility Inclusion criteria: women aged 20-69; cT1-3N0-1M0; HER2+ or TNBC (defined by ER-negative (&amp;lt; 10% positive cells in IHC) and PR-negative (&amp;lt; 10% positive cells in IHC)); expected complete remission at physical examination and radiological expected Tumor size ≤ 2cm or non-mass enhancement ≤ 4cm at breast MRI after standard NACT; planned breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with whole-breast irradiation; ECOG performance status 0-1. Exclusion criteria: SLNB before NACT; previous axillary surgery; bilateral BC; pregnancy. Intervention In eligible patients, BCS was performed. After BCS, patients who showed BpCR are enrolled with the omission of SLNB. Patients with no BpCR proceed with routine axillary surgery. Sample size calculation The assumption for an acceptable 5-year RFS ≥84% is based on previous study findings. The calculated total case number for per-protocol analysis is N=178. By Jun 2023, 153 patients had been enrolled and the target accrual of 178 patients is expected to be complete by Dec 2023. Study outcomes Primary endpoint: 5-year recurrence-free survival. Secondary endpoint: local recurrence-free survival, breast cancer-specific survival, overall survival, ipsilateral axillary recurrence interval, distant metastasis-free survival, contralateral breast-free survival, re-operation rate according to breast biopsy after NACT, adverse event, and quality of life. Accrual Plans The first patient was enrolled on Sep 2021. Among 223 patients who were screened, 153 patients have been enrolled in Jun 2023. We plan to complete the target accrual by Dec 2023. Conclusion The primary aim of the ASLAN trial is to demonstrate the oncologic safety of omitting axillary surgery for the excellent response after NACT in HER2+ or TNBC, early breast cancer patients undergoing BCS and adjuvant RT ASLAN trial, altogether with the EUBREAST-01 and ASCIS trials, will answer the very important question that may alter the axillary surgery in highly selected patients after NACT Citation Format: Jai Min Ryu, Wonshik Han, Han-Byoel Lee, Sung Gwe Ahn, Hee Jeong Kim, Hyung Seok Park, Ji Soo Choi, Hyunjun Lee, Hae Young Kim, Jeong Eon Lee. Selective Avoidance of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy In HER-2 Positive/Triple Negative Breast Cancer Patients With Excellent Radiologic Response to the Breast and Axilla [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-19-10.

Abstract PO1-22-09: Current margin assessment practice for breast-conserving surgery in China: a single institution audit

Abstract Background The appropriate negative margin width following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for both ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive carcinoma (IC) has witnessed a shift towards de-escalation in international guidelines. However, there are limited nationwide data regarding margin assessment practice for BCS in China. This study aims to clarify the current real-world status of margin assessment from a single institution audit and secondarily to update the evidence on the association between margin width and local recurrence. Methods Eligible cases were derived from an extensive series of consecutive unselected patients with early invasive breast cancer who were treated with BCS at the Department of Breast Surgery in Shanghai Cancer Center Fudan University (FUSCC) between January 2015 and December 2017. Patient demographic and clinicopathological information as well as follow-up data were extracted from the hospital's electronic medical records. Pathological evaluation of negative margins was defined as no ink on tumor for IC in accordance with the SSO/ASTRO consensus guidelines released in 2014. Where applicable, margins were categorized as tumor on ink (involved), close margins (no tumor on ink but ≤1 mm), clear margins (1-2 mm), wide margins (2-5 mm), and wider margins (&amp;gt;5 mm). The positive margin rate (PMR), reoperation rate, and ipsilateral breast recurrence (IBR) rate were calculated according to different margin widths. Multivariable analyses of factors associated with re-excision were performed using binary logistic regression. Kaplan‒Meier survival curve analysis was performed for local recurrence-free survival (LRFS). Results A total of 2707 patients were enrolled in the current study, with a total PMR of 2.7%. The distribution of margin width revealed that wider margins (&amp;gt;5 mm) were optimized by most surgical oncologists (2092/2707, 77.3%) for BCS in our center. Additionally, the reoperation rates were 1.9% in the whole population, accounting for 48.3%, 7.5%, 4.2%, 0.8%, and 0.4% in each margin group. Specifically, among 247 patients with margins ≤2 mm, 41 (16.6%) received reoperation either by margin re-excision or mastectomy. Multivariable analyses identified that lobular histology, no selective additional resection and in situ pathology of involved/close margins are independent factors of re-excision recommendation. With a median follow-up of 54.3 months, the incidence of IBR was 1.7% in the whole cohort, representing for 5.2%, 4.2%, 2.8%, 1.9%, and 1.3% in each margin group, respectively. Kaplan‒Meier survival curve analysis showed a marginally significant difference in 5-year LRFS between groups with margins &amp;gt;2 mm and margins ≤2 mm (95.9% vs 97.8%, Table 1). Conclusions A wider margin width was preferably adopted in the routine practice of BCS. Our audit was aligned with previous evidence that a minimum clear margin of 2 mm is associated with a lower reoperation rate but favorable local control. Patients with margins no more than 2 mm were more likely to have re-excision in cases of lobular histology, no selective additional resection, and in situ pathology of involved/close margins. Ipsilateral breast recurrence models by margin status Citation Format: Feilin Qu, Cheng-Jia Shen, Wen-Tao Yang, Jun-Jie Li, Guangyu Liu, Zhi-Ming Shao. Current margin assessment practice for breast-conserving surgery in China: a single institution audit [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-22-09.

Abstract PO4-20-05: An open label phase III randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy of Post-chemotherapy Axillary Conservation Surgery in breast cancer (PACS)

Abstract Background- Axillary lymph nodes (ALN) status is the most important prognostic factor in breast cancer. Traditionally, a complete axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) has been standard of care for those patients who have a positive node pre-chemotherapy. However, lately axillary conservation is paving its way in the post-chemotherapy setting as well to avoid significant morbidity of ALND. Most sentinel node biopsy studies have failed to achieve the desired false negative rate(FNR). (Boughey JC et al, JAMA. 2013 Oct; Kuehn T et al, Lancet Oncol. 2013; Boileau JF et al, J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jan).We previously reported a low FNR of low axillary sampling (LAS) in the post-chemotherapy setting. (Parmar et al, JCO-GO, 2021) We are conducting a phase III, randomised controlled trial of LAS versus complete ALND in post-chemotherapy negative (ypN0) axilla. Aims and objectives- The primary objective is to assess the non-inferiority of LAS in patients who are rendered ypN0 by pre-operative chemotherapy with disease-free survival as primary end point. The secondary objectives are comparing the morbidity of ALND (lymphedema, paraesthesia, and shoulder dysfunction) in the LAS and ALND arms, and to evaluate the impact on overall survival, local, regional, and distant recurrence free survival and quality of life. Trial design- This is a prospective, open label, randomised, phase III trial where histologically proven, non-metastatic, cT1-4,N0-2 breast cancer patients who are rendered ycN0 after pre-operative systemic chemotherapy are being accrued. Patients with prechemo N3 disease, inflammatory breast cancer, recurrent disease, pregnancy associated breast cancer are being excluded from the study. The chemotherapy regimens and surgical assessment is as per standard institutional protocols. After obtaining informed consent, patients undergo LAS during surgery and lymph nodes(LN) are sent for frozen section analysis. If any LN is found to be involved, a complete ALND is carried out. If the staging procedure is negative, then patients are randomised into 2 groups- observation v/s complete ALND. Stratification factors are T stage, N stage, Hormone receptor status, Her2 receptor status and number of chemotherapy cycles taken. Morbidity assessment is done with- Constans shoulder score, arm volumetry, paraesthesia assessment, and a QOL questionnaire- Self-reported Breast cancer Lymphedema Symptom Experience Index (BCLSEI). A baseline assessment pre-surgery is followed by 6 monthly morbidity assessments and regular oncologically relevant follow-up up to 5 years. A two-sided log-rank test with an overall sample size of 2316 with a 10% dropout rate (1158 in ALND and 1158 in LAS group) achieves 80% power at a 0.05 significance level to detect a hazard ratio of 1.16 (upper limit of non-inferiority) when the proportion surviving in the control group is 0.71. An interim analysis will be carried out at 25% events and conditional power will be calculated. If the conditional power is below 20%, then the study will be discontinued for futility. The study has been approved by Institutional Ethics Committee (CTRI/2022/07/044461) Expected Study and Results- We started accrual in February 2023 and have screened 63 and randomized 45 patients until now. Ours is a first large randomised prospective study in the post-chemotherapy axillary management setting which will help us understand the efficacy of axillary conservation surgery in patients who are node negative post neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In future, lesser morbid procedures than LAS like targeted axillary dissection can be tested in the same trial. However, LAS as a technique of axillary conservation suits resource constraints and high volume setting such as ours. Citation Format: Shalaka Joshi, Jessicka Shah, Pallavi Daphale, Rohini Hawaldar, Anuradha Daptardar, Ayushi Sahay, Tanuja Shet, Palak Popat, Tabassum Wadasadawala, Nita Nair, Vani Parmar, Bipin Bandre, Shabina Siddique, Vaibhav Vanmali, Sudeep Gupta, Rajendra Badwe. An open label phase III randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy of Post-chemotherapy Axillary Conservation Surgery in breast cancer (PACS) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-20-05.

Abstract PO4-18-09: SMALL: Open Surgery versus Minimally invasive vacuum-Assisted excision for smaLL screen-detected breast cancer – a UK phase III randomised multi-centre trial

Abstract Background: Mammographic screening programmes reduce breast cancer mortality but detect many small good-prognosis tumours which may not progress. Screen-detected cancers are currently treated with standard surgery and adjuvant therapies, with associated morbidities. There is a need to reduce overtreatment of good prognosis tumours and numerous studies are evaluating omission of radiotherapy in low-risk disease. However, there is little evidence to support surgical de-escalation, although percutaneous minimally invasive treatment approaches have been described. Vacuum-assisted excision (VAE) is in widespread use for management of lesions of uncertain malignant potential and benign lesions. SMALL (ISRCTN 12240119) is designed to determine the feasibility of using this approach to treat small invasive tumours detected within the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme. Methods: SMALL is a phase III multicentre randomised trial comparing standard surgery with VAE for screen-detected cancers. Main eligibility criteria are age ≥47 years, unifocal grade 1 tumours with maximum diameter 15mm, strongly ER/PR+ve and HER2-ve, with negative axillary staging. Patients are randomised 2:1 to VAE or surgery, with no axillary surgery in the VAE arm. Completeness of excision is assessed radiologically, and if excision is incomplete, patients undergo surgery. Adjuvant radiotherapy and endocrine therapy are mandated in the VAE arm but may be omitted following surgery. Co-primary end-points are: 1. Non-inferiority comparison of the requirement for a second procedure following excision 2. Single arm analysis of local recurrence (LR) at 5 years following VAE Recruitment of 800 patients will permit demonstration of 10% non-inferiority of VAE for requirement of a second procedure. This ensures sufficient patients for single arm analysis of LR rates, where expected LR free survival is 99% at 5 years, with an undesirable survival probability after VAE of 97%. To ensure that the trial as a whole only has 5% alpha, the significance level for each co-primary outcome is set at 2.5% with 90% power. The Data Monitoring Committee will monitor LR events to ensure these do not exceed 3% per year. Secondary outcome measures include time to ipsilateral recurrence, overall survival, complications, quality of life and health economic analysis. A novel feature of SMALL is the integration of a QuinteT Recruitment Intervention (QRI), which aims to optimise recruitment to the study. Recruitment challenges are identified by analysing recruiter/patient interviews and audio-recordings of trial discussions, and by review of trial screening logs, eligibility and recruitment data and study documentation. Solutions to address these are developed collaboratively, including individual/group recruiter feedback and recruitment tips documents. Results: SMALL opened in December 2019, but recruitment halted in 2020 for 5 months due to COVID-19. At 6th July 2023, 39 centres are open, with 300 patients randomised from 32 of these, with a randomisation rate of approximately 45%, and a per site recruitment rate of 0.4-0.5 patients/month. Despite the pandemic, SMALL achieved the internal pilot feasibility targets and continues to recruit to the main study, with estimated completion of recruitment in June 2025. Drawing from preliminary QRI findings and insights from patient representatives, a recruitment tips document has been circulated (on providing balanced information about treatments, encouraging recruiters to engage with patient preferences, and explaining randomisation). Individual recruiter feedback has commenced and wider feedback is being delivered across sites via recruitment training workshops. Conclusion: Despite pandemic-related challenges, SMALL has excellent recruitment to date and is expected to have a global impact on treatment of breast cancer within mammographic screening programmes. SMALL is funded by the UK NIHR HTA programme award 17/42/32 Citation Format: Stuart McIntosh, Charlotte Coles, David Dodwell, Kenneth Elder, Jessica Foster, Claire Gaunt, Amanda Kirkham, Iain Lyburn, Sangeetha Paramasivan, Jenna Morgan, Sarah Pinder, Shelley Potter, Tracy Roberts, Nisha Sharma, Hilary Stobart, Elizabeth Southgate, Sian Taylor-Phillips, Matthew Wallis, Daniel Rea. SMALL: Open Surgery versus Minimally invasive vacuum-Assisted excision for smaLL screen-detected breast cancer – a UK phase III randomised multi-centre trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-18-09.

What is an Adequate Margin During Sublobar Resection of ≤3cm N0 Subsolid Lung Adenocarcinomas?

Sublobar resection offers non-inferior survival vs. lobectomy for ≤2cm NSCLC and is commonly employed for subsolid tumors. While data exists for solid tumors, the minimum adequate margin of resection for subsolid adenocarcinomas remains unclear. Retrospective review of 1101 adenocarcinoma resections at our institution, 2006-2022. tumors≤3cm with ≥10% radiographic ground glass, excised by sublobar resection. positive nodes, positive or unreported margin. The primary outcome was rate of local recurrence(LR) at multiple thresholds of margin distance. Relationship between margin distance and solid-component size was also explored. 194 patients met inclusion criteria. Median(IQR) tumor diameter and margin distance were 12(9-17)mm and 10(5-17)mm, respectively. Median follow-up was 42.5 months. There was a progressive increase in LR with diminishing margin (0.1cm decrements) from 1.5cm to 0.5cm. The difference in the rate of LR between "over"(n=143) and "under"(n=51) was most significant at 0.5cm [8/51(15.7%) vs. 6/143(4.2%),p=0.01] but did not reach α adjusted for multiple comparisons. On Cox regression for LR-free survival (LRFS), margin ≤0.5cm(p=0.19) and %solid component (p=0.14) trended to significance. Combining these using margin-distance-to-solid-component-size ratio, a ratio≤1 did show a significantly higher rate of local recurrence [7(14.3%) vs. 2(2.0%),p=0.009]. Treatment of local recurrences provided at least intermediate-term survival in 87% of recurrences (median post-recurrence follow-up 44 months). During sublobar resection of subsolid lung adenocarcinomas, margin-to-solid-component-size ratio>1.0 appears to be a more reliable factor than margin distance alone to minimize local recurrence. Local recurrence, however, may not impact survival in patients with subsolid adenocarcinomas if timely treatment is administered.

Utility of CT Radiomics and Delta Radiomics for Survival Evaluation in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.

A high incidence rate of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) has been observed in Southeast Asia compared to other parts of the world. Radiomics is a computational tool to predict outcomes and may be used as a prognostic biomarker for advanced NPC treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Recently, radiomic analysis of the peripheral tumor microenvironment (TME), which is the region surrounding the gross tumor volume (GTV), has shown prognostic usefulness. In this study, not only was gross tumor volume (GTVt) analyzed but also tumor peripheral regions (GTVp) were explored in terms of the TME concept. Both radiomic features and delta radiomic features were analyzed using CT images acquired in a routine radiotherapy process. A total of 50 patients with NPC stages III, IVA, and IVB were enrolled between September 2004 and February 2014. Survival models were built using Cox regression with clinical factors (i.e., gender, age, overall stage, T stage, N stage, and treatment dose) and radiomic features. Radiomic features were extracted from GTVt and GTVp. GTVp was created surrounding GTVt for TME consideration. Furthermore, delta radiomics, which is the longitudinal change in quantitative radiomic features, was utilized for analysis. Finally, C-index values were computed using leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) to evaluate the performances of all prognosis models. Models were built for three different clinical outcomes, including overall survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and progression-free survival (PFS). The range of the C-index in clinical factor models was (0.622, 0.729). All radiomics models, including delta radiomics models, were in the range of (0.718, 0.872). Among delta radiomics models, GTVt and GTVp were in the range of (0.833, 0.872) and (0.799, 0.834), respectively. Radiomic analysis on the proximal region surrounding the gross tumor volume of advanced NPC patients for survival outcome evaluation was investigated, and preliminary positive results were obtained. Radiomic models and delta radiomic models demonstrated performance that was either superior to or comparable with that of conventional clinical models.

Combined pretreatment neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio predicts survival and prognosis in patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective study

The clinical significance of the combination of neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) is unclear. This study investigated the predictive value of pretreatment NLR (pre-NLR) combined with pretreatment PLR (pre-PLR) for the survival and prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). A total of 765 patients with non-metastatic NPC from two hospitals were retrospectively analyzed. The pre-NLR-PLR groups were as follows: HRG, high pre-NLR and high pre-PLR. MRG, high pre-NLR and low pre-PLR or low pre-NLR and high pre-PLR. LRG, neither high pre-NLR nor high pre-PLR. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to identify the cutoff-value and discriminant performance of the model. We compared survival rates and factors affecting the prognosis among different groups. The 5-year overall survival (OS), local regional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) of NPC patients in HRG were significantly poorer than those in MRG and LRG. The pre-NLR-PLR score was positively correlated with T stage, clinical stage, ECOG, and pathological classification. Multivariate cox regression analysis showed that pre-NLR-PLR scoring system, ECOG, pre-ALB, pre-CRP and pre-LMR were independent risk factors affecting 5-year OS, LRRFS and DMFS. The ROC curve showed that area under the curve (AUC) values of pre-NLR-PLR of 5-year OS, LRRFS and DMFS were higher than those of pre-NLR and pre-PLR. pre-NLR-PLR is an independent risk factor for the prognosis of NPC. The pre-NLR-PLR scoring system can be used as an individualized clinical assessment tool to predict the prognosis of patients with non-metastatic NPC more accurately and easily.

The impact of tumor budding and single-cell invasion on survival in patients with stage III/IV locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma- results from a prospective cohort study.

Tumor budding (TB) refers to the presence of small clusters of tumor cells at the invasive front of a malignant tumor. Single tumor cell invasion (SCI) is an extreme variant of TB, in which individual loose tumor cells are present at the invasive front. Both TB and SCI are important histomorphologic risk factors postulated to indicate loss of cellular cohesion. In this study, we investigated the influence of TB and SCI on different survival outcomes in patients with locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). We included 129 patients with locally advanced OSCC (pT3-4) from a single-center, prospectively maintained cohort. We examined the association of TB and SCI with the presence of occult lymph node metastasis using a logistic regression model. Survival probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and cumulative incidence functions. The association of TB and SCI on overall survival (OS), oral cancer-specific survival (OCSS), and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) was investigated using Cox's proportional hazards regression models. TB was detected in 98 (76%) of the tumors, while SCI was observed in 66 (51%) patients. There was a significant association between TB and the occurrence of occult lymph node metastasis (OR=3.33, CI: 1.21-10.0). On multivariate analysis, TB had no detectable impact on survival outcomes. However, SCI showed a higher risk for local recurrence (Hazards ratio (HR): 3.33, CI: 1.19 - 9.27). This study demonstrates that TB and SCI in locally advanced OSCC function as an independent risk factor for occult lymph node metastases, as well as local recurrences. Both histomorphologic risk factors could serve as an additional parameter for stratifying therapy and escalating multimodal treatment approaches.

Short- and long-term post-nephrectomy outcomes for retroperitoneal liposarcoma from a high-volume sarcoma center: a propensity score matching analysis.

Multivisceral en bloc resection with the ipsilateral kidney is commonly performed in patients with retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RLPS). We evaluated the effect of nephrectomy on short- and long-term outcomes in patients with RLPS. Data from a prospectively maintained database of the Peking University Cancer Hospital Sarcoma Center between April 2011 and August 2022 were analyzed. We classified the RLPS patients who underwent surgery into nephrectomy group (NP) and non-nephrectomy group (non-NP). Patients were matched using a 1:1 propensity score to eliminate baseline differences between groups. Postoperative renal function outcomes, major morbidity, and mortality were analyzed to compare short-term outcomes after nephrectomy. Differences in local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared by Kaplan-Meier analysis with respect to oncological benefits. In the matched cohort, patients in the NP group had significantly higher postoperative eGFR and CKD stages, but none required dialysis. Patients between NP and non-NP had a comparable major morbidity (p = 0.820) and 60-day mortality (p = 0.475). Patients in the NP group had a higher 5-year LRFS rates than those in the non-NP group (34.5 vs. 17.8%, p = 0.015), and similar 5-year OS rates (52.4 vs. 47.1%, p = 0.401). Nephrectomy was an independent risk factor for LRFS, but not for major morbidity or OS. RLPS resection with nephrectomy is related to a mild progression of renal impairment; however, dialysis is rare. En bloc nephrectomy for complete resection of RLPS is safe and improves local control.