ABSTRACT Local decentralized energy projects are becoming an important component of the transition to renewable energy. These projects include aspirations that go beyond merely clean energy projection and include side benefits like fostering community empowerment, social cohesion, economic gains, and job opportunities. However, there is little evidence to what extend these projects deliver their promises and how different groups perceive the projects’ impacts in the post-implementation phase. Most of the existing assessment projects have a technoeconomic nature and are led by external stakeholders. Thus, they often fail to account for the local demands and expectations. The present study aims to bridge this gap by proposing the use of an ethical matrix combined with a follow-up deliberative workshop to evaluate the impact of local renewable energy projects postimplementation. Using the example of El Hierro Island’s local energy project, the study identifies project stakeholders and discusses their views. Results reveal significant differences in actor opinions, emphasizing the necessity to move beyond narrow project assessments to a pluralistic approach using ethical tools to challenge established moral frameworks.
Read full abstract