ABSTRACT Rivers, along with mountain ranges, watersheds and coastlines, have long been used to separate states and regions in South Asia. Following the Anglo-Gorkha War (1814–1816), the Narayani River in the Tarai became one such landscape feature demarcating the border between Nepal and India. But the river’s recent change of course has posed material and conceptual challenges to the legacy of colonial frontier-making projects. India asserts that the new river direction is the international boundary, while Nepal contends otherwise. Stranded in disputed territory, the residents of Susta identify as Nepali, although few possess legal citizenship and landownership documents. For many individuals, this situation raises a critical question: Should a change in the course of a river also change the national affiliation of a people? Focusing attention on everyday life in Susta, we argue that foregrounding the environment – and particularly water bodies – is essential for a critical understanding of contemporary borders. The seasonal rhythms of the monsoon that shape the fluvial landscapes of the Tarai allow us to analyse how, when and where borders materialise and with what effects on attempts to secure territorial control. Drawing on long-term ethnographic research, we show that water is deeply entangled in local and regional politics of place-making and belonging, which, in turn, leads us to recognise borders as complex, more-than-human assemblages.
Read full abstract