276A RT HURIANA towards violently disruptive behaviour had alienated his local peers - the Suffolk esquire John Belsham perhaps being a comparable, if rather more extreme, example from the 1430s (P.C. Maddern, Violence and Social Order: EastAnglia 1422-1442, Oxford, 1992: 154-66) - than of the 'very special prisoner' whom the Lancastrian authorities were detetmined to keep under lock and key (117) proposed here. (It may be wotth noting that, Fauconberg apart, the only magnate apparently prepared to take an active interest in Malory by the mid-i450s was the duke of Norfolk, whose involvement in East Anglian local affairs was characterised by consistently poor political judgement, and who had been the only landowner from that region, gentle or noble, prepared to offer support to John Belsham.) TheLifeand Times ofSir Thomas Malory is a noteworthy and painstaking examination (presented, frustratingly, without a bibliography) of the surviving evidence relating to the man who, in all probability, wrote the Morte Darthur. However, largely because of the limitations of the source material, it is a book which rarely comes to life. It is a shame that such momentum as the text gathers is most often provided by the personal tone with which previous work on Malory's life (particularly that of Matthews and Carpenter) is criticised - a tone which seems ill-judged both in terms of analytical style, and because the points at issue are frequently not as clear-cut as Dr Field suggests. HELEN CASTOR Jesus College, Cambridge p.j.c. field, The Life and Times of Sir Thomas Malory. Arthurian Studies 29. Woodbridge, Suffolk and Rochester, N.Y: D. S. Brewer, 1993. Pp. x, 218. isbn: 085991 -385-6. $53.00. This should not be the first biography of Sir Thomas Malory that you read, but it should be the last. Given the paucity ofevidence regarding the life ofThomas Malory of Newbold Revel, it is a staggering achievement to say so much so economically as Field does; Kittredge's work, after all, was just a pamphlet ( Who Was Sir ThomasMahry? Boston, 1897), and Flick's (Sir Thomas Malory: His Turbulent Career, Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1928) a slim volume. Here, Field amasses a wealth ofprimary documentary evidence and fleshes out Malory's profile from the work ofthe Warwickshire historian Christine Carpenter (Locality and Polity: A Study ofWarwickshire Landed Society 1401pp , Cambridge: 1992). However, since the latest book-length treatment of the author of the Morte took him to be someone other than the knight of Newbold Revel (William Matthews, The Ill-FramedKnight: A SkepticalInquiry into the Identity ofSir Thomas Malory, Berkeley and Los Angeles: U of California P, 1966), and since R.R. Griffith and others have recently put forward yet another candidate for serious consideration ('The Authorship Question Reconsidered: A Case for Thomas Malory of Papworth St. Agnes, Cambridgeshire,' Aspects ofMalory, ed. Toshiyuki Takamiya and Derek Brewer, Woodbridge: Boydell and Brewer, 1981: 159-77), it was obviously necessary to justify Field's choice before relating any of the subject's life. Thus, he devotes the first two REVIEWS277 chapters to establishing the claim for Sir Thomas ofNewbold Revel and to disproving the others. Of the nine candidates for authorship, one 'is certainly Sir Thomas of Newbold Revel under a different appellation' (6); the second, an M.P. for Bedwin and Wareham, Field suggests was the same person (94-96); the third was a fiction 'created by John Bale'(7) the sixteenth-centuty antiquarian; a further four Field discounts on the grounds either that they were not knights or did not have sufficient social rank or income to have been granted knighthood; and this leaves two: the subject ofthe book, and Thomas Malory ofHutton Conyers in Yorkshire, favoured by William Matthews. Field builds a convincing case that this latter candidate was not a knight, and therefore also not the author of the Morte. In the second chapter, Field argues persuasively that the four documents cited by Matthews as referring to Thomas Malory of Hutton Conyers actually refer toThomas Malory ofNewbold Revel. All this depends, ofcourse, on likelihood, rather than categorical proof. The whole book is such; but all the evidence is so circumstantial that the matter can hardly be decided otherwise. There...