Local Adverse Events Research Articles

Clinical outcomes of modified transarterial chemoembolization vs. drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization as initial treatment for single hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis.

Optimizing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) can enhance treatment efficacy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study compares modified TACE (M-TACE), which combines a lipiodol-based emulsion and drug-eluting beads, with drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE) as initial therapies for solitary HCC. In this retrospective study, 185 patients undergoing M-TACE or DEB-TACE were evaluated. Propensity score matching was used to create 69 balanced pairs. Initial tumor response, repeated treatments within six months, local tumor progression (LTP), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were assessed. M-TACE exhibited significantly higher initial complete response (CR) rates (39.1% vs. 23.2%, p = 0.043) and fewer repeated treatments within six months (1.7 ± 0.9 vs. 2.1 ± 0.7; p = 0.033) compared to DEB-TACE. LTP rates were notably lower with M-TACE at 12 months (39.1% vs. 65.2%, p = 0.002), and median time to LTP was prolonged with M-TACE (13.3 vs. 8.2 months, p = 0.038). Stratified analysis revealed a significantly longer OS in individuals achieving a CR after the initial M-TACE (50.5 vs. 33.4 months, p = 0.043). However, the overall study population did not exhibit a significant difference in OS between the two groups. Comparable AEs (all p > 0.05) were observed. M-TACE showed higher initial CR rates, lower LTP rates, and extended time to LTP compared to DEB-TACE, indicating its potential to enhance TACE effectiveness for solitary HCC.

Quadrivalent HPV (4vHPV) vaccine immunogenicity and safety in women using immunosuppressive drugs due to solid organ transplant

IntroductionImmunocompromised persons are at high risk of persistent Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) infection and associated diseases. Few studies evaluated HPV vaccines in immunocompromised persons. This study aimed to evaluate the quadrivalent HPV vaccine (4vHPV) immunogenicity and safety in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, in comparison to immunocompetent women (IC).MethodsOpen-label clinical trial that enrolled SOT recipients and immunocompetent women aged 18 to 45 years. All participants received three doses of 4vHPV vaccine. Blood samples were drawn for evaluation of immune responses at baseline and one month after the third vaccination. Seroconversion rates and antibody geometric mean concentration (GMC) against HPV 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 35, 52 and 58 were measured with in-house multiplexed serology assay (xMAP technology). Follow-up for the local and systemic adverse events (AEs) continued for seven days after each vaccination. Severe AEs were evaluated throughout the study.Results125 SOT and 132 immunocompetent women were enrolled; 105 (84%) SOT and 119 (90%) immunocompetent women completed the study. At baseline, HPV seropositivity was not significantly different between groups. Seroconversion rates were significantly lower in SOT (HPV18, 57%; HPV6 and 16, 69%; and HPV11, 72%) than in immunocompetent women (100% seroconversion to all vaccine types) (p<0.001). Antibody GMCs of all four HPV vaccine types were also significantly lower in SOT (p<0.001). Pain in the injection site and headache were the most frequent adverse event in both groups. Local pain was more frequent in immunocompetent women than in SOT recipients. Rates of other AEs were comparable in both groups.Conclusion4vHPV vaccine was well-tolerated by SOT recipients. We found strong evidence of lower humoral immune responses to 4vHPV vaccine in SOT compared to immunocompetent women, which strengthen recommendation of routine cervical cancer screening in SOT recipients regardless of HPV vaccination status.

Current Practice and Perspectives on Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy in Patients with Primary Antibody Deficiency Among Specialized Nurses in Poland

Background/Objectives: Inborn errors of immunity (IEI) encompass various congenital disorders, resulting in immunity defects and recurrent infections. Home-based subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy (scIgRT) is the best treatment option for those with primary antibody deficiency (PAD). However, the lack of standardized procedures in patient training remains a challenge. Our study investigates nurses’ practice and perspectives, aiming to identify areas for improvement in at-home scIgRT practice. Methods: We prepared a structured survey regarding scIgRT, including needle choice experience and perception of adverse events, and distributed it among qualified nurses involved in patient training and scIgRT supervising. Results: We included 56 nurses with a median age of 50 years. Among them, 67.9% represented adult care providers, while 32.1% supervised IgRT in children. Most respondents (83.9%) used the classic or assisted with hyaluronidase scIgRT preparations. Single-channel needles were administered most commonly (85.7%). The needle length was mostly chosen solely by a nurse (57.1%) or in cooperation with the patient (23.2%). Next, 9 mm and 12 mm needles were used most often (92.9% and 78.6%, respectively). As expected, the 6 mm needle was more frequently applied for children compared to adults (n = 16, 88.9% vs. n = 11, 28.9%, p < 0.001), while 12 mm was primarily used in adults (n = 35, 92.1% vs. n = 9, 50.0%, p < 0.001). Visual skin fold assessment was the basis for the needle selection (58.9%), followed by the injection site rule (26.8%) or a choice between two available needle types for thinner or thicker patients (25.0%). Results of this survey indicate that, according to nurses’ opinions presented in this survey, the needle length could be associated with local scIgRT adverse events, such as side needle leakage or local burning. Yet, it was likely unrelated to general adverse signs, such as headaches or dizziness. Most respondents (66.1%) indicated that, even if local adverse events occur, patients are reluctant to change scIgRT preparation or needle length. Most participants (69.6%) reported that the optimal administration technique needs to be discussed with the patient before and during scIgRT. Conclusions: This study sheds light on scIgRT practice in Poland, emphasizing deficiency in needle selection technique. Future research should focus on standardized training and advanced needle selection procedures on patient outcomes, investigating the correlation between needle strategies and adverse events, as well as the effectiveness of scIgRT.

Safety and immunogenicity of a modified mRNA-lipid nanoparticle vaccine candidate against COVID-19: Results from a phase 1, dose-escalation study

ABSTRACT This phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation, multi-center study (NCT05477186) assessed the safety and immunogenicity of a booster dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (CV0501) encoding the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 spike protein. Participants aged ≥ 18 years previously vaccinated with ≥ 2 doses of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine received CV0501 doses ranging from 12 to 200 μg. After assessment of safety and immunogenicity of the 12 μg dose in 30 adults, 30 adults ≤ 64 years were randomized to receive either a 3 or 6 μg dose. Solicited adverse events (AEs) were collected for 7 days, unsolicited AEs for 28 days, and serious AEs (SAEs), medically attended AEs (MAAEs), and AEs of special interest (AESIs) until day (D) 181 post-vaccination. Serum neutralizing titers specific to SARS-CoV-2 BA.1, wild-type, Delta, and additional Omicron subvariants were assessed at D1, D15, D29, D91, and D181. Of 180 vaccinated participants (mean age: 49.3 years; 57.8% women), 70.6% had prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Most solicited local (98.1%) and systemic (96.7%) AEs were of mild-to-moderate severity; the most common were injection site pain (57.5%; 33.3–73.3% across groups) and myalgia (36.9%; 13.3–56.7%). Unsolicited AEs were reported by 14.4% (6.7–26.7%) of participants (mild-to-moderate severity in 88.5% of the participants). Three participants (1.7%) reported SAEs, 16.7% (6.7–30.0%) reported MAAEs, and 8.3% (0.0–13.3%) reported AESIs (15 COVID-19 cases), none related to vaccination. Geometric means of serum neutralizing titers increased from baseline to D15 and D29 (dose-dependent), and then decreased over time. The safety and immunogenicity results supported advancement to a phase 2 trial.

A Phase II/III multicenter randomized single blind non-inferiority immunogenicity and safety study of TeddyVac™ vaccine of Human Biologicals Institute in healthy subjects of 10 years to 60 years of age

Background WHO and other health agencies recommend that tetanus toxoid (TT) should be replaced by tetanus-diphtheria (Td) vaccine taking into consideration the low coverage and waning immunity, especially for diphtheria. In this randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority study, the immunogenicity and safety of TeddyVac™ vaccine of Human Biologicals Institute were compared with an existing brand. Methods The study involved 444 eligible subjects in two age groups at four centres across India. Group A included subjects of 18–60 years and Group B subjects of 10–18 years of age. All subjects received single dose of either TeddyVac™ or the comparator vaccine as per randomisation. Blood samples for antibody titre estimation were collected before vaccination and 4–6 weeks after vaccination. Immunogenicity was assessed by estimating seroconversion rate, seroprotection rate, and geometric mean titres of antibodies. Safety was evaluated by collection and analysis of data on solicited and unsolicited adverse events. Results Overall, 441 subjects completed the study. Both the vaccine arms showed comparable seroconversion after a single dose for both the components. Both arms showed increase in seroprotection and geometric mean titres after a single dose of vaccination for both vaccine components, being significantly better for the diphtheria component in the test vaccine arm. Only few minor local and systemic adverse events were observed in both the vaccine arms. No serious adverse event was reported. Conclusion The study results indicate that the TeddyVac™ vaccine is immunogenic, safe and non-inferior to the comparator Vaccine when administered to healthy subjects of 10 to 60 years of age. CTRI Registration number CTRI/2021/07/035112

Umbilical Cord Blood Platelet Lysate Eyedrops for the Treatment of Severe Ocular Surface Disorders in Graft vs. Host Disease Patients: Clinical Study

Background: Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) is an overactive systemic inflammatory response that can arise following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). This condition occurs when the transplanted donor immune cells recognize the recipient’s tissues as foreign and trigger an immune response against them. The ocular surface (eyelids, conjunctiva, meibomian glands, lacrimal glands, and cornea) is particularly involved in GvHD, and its response to existing treatments, including potent immunosuppressants and new targeted therapies, is undesirable, with such treatments often being ineffective. Human allogeneic umbilical cord blood platelet lysate stands out as a potent adjunct to conventional therapies for ocular surface disorders related to severe Dry Eye Disease. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of umbilical cord blood platelet lysate eyedrops for the treatment of severe ocular surface disorders in graft-versus-host disease patients who have received previous unsuccessful treatments. Methods: This study was a prospective, non-comparative, interventional case series study involving 22 patients (10 females and 12 males) aged 25–46 years with severe ocular surface disorders that were unresponsive to standard treatments. The GvHD patients were categorized based on the severity of their ocular surface disorders into three groups: Group I: five patients with severe Dry Eye Disease and filamentary keratitis; Group II: eight patients suffering from severe blepharo-kerato-epitheliopathy; Group III: nine patients with corneal ulcers. Fresh umbilical cord blood (UCB) was obtained from healthy donors and subjected to centrifugation using a novel PRP preparation kit provided by Sciacca (AG) Cord blood bank, Italy in a one-step process. In all groups, the outcomes before and after treatment were evaluated by means of the OSDI (Ocular Surface Disease Index), SANDE (Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye) questionnaire, VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), slit lamp examination, Esthesiometry, Lissamine Green Staining, the NIBUT (Non-Invasive Break-Up Time) and BUT, fluorescein staining with digital photography and Oxford classification, the Schirmer Test, the Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA), and Meibography. In Group III at each evaluation time, the size of the ulcer and its relative reduction compared to the baseline size were recorded. Clinical variables, such as corneal inflammation, conjunctivalization, corneal neovascularization, or pain, were also considered individually. Results: We observed a significant improvement in the SANDE, VAS, and OSDI scores; Schirmer Test; BUT; BCVA; and Oxford classification after treatment with allogeneic cord blood serum eyedrops. Nevertheless, pain and inflammation reduced markedly over time until complete healing in all cases. The mean reduction in the ulcer surface area (compared to baseline values) was significantly higher at all assessment points (p = 0.001 for day 7 and p < 0.001 for subsequent time points every 30 days for 90 days). At the last check-up (after 90 days of treatment), the number of ulcers (Group III, nine patients) with a reduction in size of greater than 50% was eight (88.8%), of which seven ulcers were completely healed. None of the patients experienced treatment-related local or systemic adverse events. In this study, using a relatively large number of cases, we demonstrated that the use of umbilical cord blood platelet lysate eyedrops is a safe, feasible, and effective curative approach for severe ocular surface disease in patients with GvHD. Conclusions: Our pilot study highlights the remarkable effectiveness of allogeneic cord blood serum eyedrops in patients with severe ocular surface disorders following GvHD who have shown an inadequate response to the usual treatments. It is mandatory to design future studies on the efficacy of this therapeutic approach for acute ocular, mucosal, and cutaneous GvHD.

Sublingual Administration of Tacrolimus is Safe and Provides Similar Drug Exposure to Per-oral Route in Liver Transplant Recipients During Early Postoperative Period–A Large, Retrospective, Observational Study

BackgroundPer-oral(PO) administration of Tacrolimus(TAC) results in inadequate trough levels in early post-operative period in liver-transplant(LT) recipients who undergo Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy for biliary reconstruction. Sublingual administration(SL) of tacrolimus provides an alternative route in such patients. ObjectiveTo assess feasibility and safety of SL tacrolimus in adult LT-recipients in early post-operative period and to compare therapeutic efficacy of SL administration of tacrolimus vs.PO route. Patients and MethodSingle-centre, retrospective, observational study carried out in adult living donor liver transplant(LDLT) recipients between January 2022 till December 2022. Recipients who underwent Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy for biliary reconstruction, received tacrolimus through SL route till post-operative day(POD)5 as they were kept nil per oral constituted the study group while recipients who underwent duct-to-duct(D-D) anastomosis for biliary reconstruction were allowed orally from POD1 and received PO-tacrolimus were chosen as controls. Feasibility and safety of SL-Tacrolimus was assessed in terms of patient acceptance, need to discontinue SL-Tacrolimus, incidence of local adverse effects and systemic adverse events like neurotoxicity and nephrotoxicity. Therapeutic efficacy was evaluated by comparing median trough levels(TAC level) achieved and incidence of graft rejection between two groups. Results212 patients underwent LT during the study period of which 125 were included(58 in SL-group and 67 in PO-group). Both groups had comparable baseline characteristics. In SL-group, all patients tolerated SL-Tacrolimus well and no local adverse events were observed. Patients with SL-Tacrolimus administration achieved higher median TAC level(ng/ml) vs.PO route(5.85 vs 5(p=0.06)) despite similar median cumulative tacrolimus dose before assessing TAC-level. 50% patients achieved TAC level ≥6ng/ml in SL-group vs. 35.8% in PO-group(p=0.14). Incidence of neurotoxicity, nephrotoxicity and graft rejection during hospital stay were similar in both the groups(p=0.56,0.82 and 0.28 respectively). ConclusionSL-tacrolimus is safe and provides similar trough levels to PO-tacrolimus and may be considered as viable alternative whenever inadequate TAC-levels are anticipated through per-oral route.

FSCIG 10% in pediatric primary immunodeficiency diseases: a European post-authorization safety study

BackgroundThe safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of hyaluronidase-facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin (fSCIG) 10% (dual-vial unit of human immunoglobulin 10% and recombinant human hyaluronidase [rHuPH20]) were assessed in children with primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDs).MethodsThis phase 4, post-authorization, prospective, interventional, multicenter study (NCT03116347) conducted in the European Economic Area, enrolled patients aged 2 to < 18 years with a documented PID diagnosis who had received immunoglobulin therapy for ≥ 3 months before enrollment. New fSCIG 10% starters underwent fSCIG 10% dose ramp-up for ≤ 6 weeks (epoch 1) before receiving fSCIG 10% for ≤ 3 years (epoch 2); patients pretreated with fSCIG 10% entered epoch 2 directly. The primary outcome was the number and rate (per infusion) of all noninfectious treatment-related serious and severe adverse events (AEs).ResultsIn total, 42 patients were enrolled and dosed (median [range] age: 11.5 [3–17] years; 81% male; 23 new starters; 19 pretreated). Overall, 49 related noninfectious, treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were reported in 15 patients; most were mild in severity (87.8%). No treatment-related serious TEAEs were reported. Two TEAEs (infusion site pain and emotional distress) were reported as severe and treatment-related in a single new fSCIG 10% starter. The rate of local TEAEs was lower in pretreated patients (0.1 event/patient-year) versus new starters (1.3 events/patient-year). No patients tested positive for binding anti-rHuPH20 antibodies (titer of ≥ 1:160).ConclusionsNo safety signals were identified, and the incidence of local AEs declined over the duration of fSCIG 10% treatment. This study supports fSCIG 10% long-term safety in children with PIDs.Trial registration number (ClinicalTrials.gov)NCT03116347.

In Vivo Histological Study Evaluating Non-Ablative Fractional 1940-nm Laser.

Non-ablative fractional lasers (NAFL) have increased in demand compared to ablative laser treatments as they provide lesser down time, fewer side-effects, and are safer to use. Non-ablative fractional treatment with lasers ranging from 1320 to 1927-nm have been shown to be safe and effective for skin resurfacing procedures. The objective of this study is to investigate healing of the 1940-nm NAFL-induced microthermal treatment zones (MTZs) in human skin from a histologic perspective. Three subjects received 1940-nm NAFL treatment to test areas on the abdomen at various timepoints during the study. The minimum 5 mJ/MTZ and maximum 20 mJ/MTZ energy settings were used at 20% coverage. Biopsies were taken coinciding with immediately posttreatment, 1, 3, 7 days, and 6 weeks posttreatment. Blinded analysis of hematoxylin and eosin stained slides was performed to measure the width and depth of the MTZs and evaluate the inflammatory and healing response of the skin over time (immediately to 6 weeks posttreatment). Safety was evaluated by assessing local skin responses and adverse events immediately after treatment and at all study visits. Histological analysis of tissue following NAFL 1940-nm treatments showed mild early inflammatory response (presence of lymphotic infiltrate) in some test areas and zones of necrosis and coagulation having widths and depths (immediately-3 days posttreatment) that scaled with the 1940-nm pulse energy. Signs of healing such as presence of dermal mucin, evidence of fibrosis, and absence of necrosis were observed long-term (7 days to 6 weeks posttreatment). Evidence of the MTZ persisted beyond the 6-week study and was predicted to last for 100 days. All local clinical skin responses healed within 6 weeks and were limited to mild, transient erythema and edema which resolved in less than 12-24 h following treatment. No serious adverse events occurred during the study. NAFL 1940-nm treatments are safe for inducing small fractional coagulation and necrosis zones in abdominal skin. NAFL 1940-nm laser creates fractional columns of injury with sufficient depth and coverage that suggest effective skin resurfacing, like other non-ablative fractional lasers.

Combined treatment of atrophic scars using radiofrequency microneedling and hyaluronic acid fillers with subcision

Introduction. Atrophic scars may be associated with significant psychological stress and a substantial negative impact on quality of life. Despite the great relevance of the atrophic scars therapy, existing treatment methods do not always provide their complete elimination.Aim. To study the efficacy of combined therapy of atrophic scars with radiofrequency microneedling (RF-MN), subcision and hyaluronic acid filler injection.Materials and methods. Ten female patients aged 28–44 years with a clinical diagnosis of atrophic scars were randomly assigned to two groups. Group 1 received RF-MN alone, while Group 2 received a combination treatment comprising RF-MN, subcision, and hyaluronic acid injections. Clinical effectiveness was assessed using the Goodman-Baron scar rating scale and the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). Ultrasound was used to determine the changes in dermal thickness. The volume of depressions and skin texture were measured using the Antera 3D®. The safety of the treatment was evaluated by recording adverse events.Results. The combined method demonstrated superior efficacy compared to RF-MN alone in the majority of efficacy parameters. In Group 2, a statistically significant reduction in Goodman-Baron scale was observed in 100% of patients (p = 0.026). 3D measurements of the face demonstrated a more pronounced improvement in skin texture in Group 2 relative to Group 1. Statistically significant changes (p = 0.027) in the Face-Q scale were exclusively observed in the group that received the combined treatment. Ultrasonic imaging demonstrated a restoration of dermal thickness following treatment. No serious adverse events were observed. Expected local adverse events (pain, erythema, swelling, and bruising) were mild and resolved spontaneously within 1–7 days.Conclusion. The combined treatment with RF-MN followed by subcision and hyaluronic acid filler injections demonstrated its efficacy in patients with atrophic scars.

Immunogenicity and safety of different dose levels of Ad26.RSV.preF/RSV preF protein vaccine in adults aged 60 years and older: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2a study

BackgroundRespiratory syncytial virus (RSV) can cause severe illness in older adults. A combination vaccine containing Ad26.RSV.preF and purified recombinant RSV preF protein has previously demonstrated efficacy and tolerability in older adults. We report results of a dose-ranging study to determine immunogenicity and safety of different doses of the Ad26.RSV.preF component in the combined Ad26.RSV.preF/RSV preF protein vaccine to support Ad26.RSV.preF drug product release and stability specifications. MethodsIn this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2a study, adults aged ≥60 years in good or stable health were randomly assigned within 1 of 3 cohorts to receive either placebo or Ad26.RSV.preF/RSV preF protein, composed of different doses of Ad26.RSV.preF with a fixed dose of RSV preF protein (150 μg). Ad26.RSV.preF doses in Cohort 1 (4 dose-down groups) ranged from 3.7 × 109 to 1.0 × 1011 viral particles (vp). Doses in Cohorts 2 and 3 (2 dose-up groups, each) ranged from 1.0 to 1.6 × 1011 vp. Primary endpoints were immunogenicity (RSV preF protein antibody titers) for Cohort 1 and safety (solicited local and systemic adverse events [AEs] and unsolicited AEs) for Cohorts 2 and 3. Immunogenicity analyses (RSV preF protein antibody titers, RSV A2 neutralizing antibodies, and RSV-F–specific interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot) were performed on the day of vaccination and 14 days, 3 months, and 6 months postvaccination. Safety was monitored from vaccination until study end. ResultsOverall, 454 participants were enrolled and received 1 dose of study vaccine or placebo (Cohort 1, n = 226; Cohort 2, n = 124; Cohort 3, n = 104). No substantial differences in measured immune responses were observed between lower or higher Ad26.RSV.preF doses compared with Ad26.RSV.preF 1.0 × 1011 vp across all postvaccination time points. All Ad26.RSV.preF doses between 3.7 × 109 vp and 1.6 × 1011 vp were well tolerated, with no safety issues identified. ConclusionsResults of this dose-ranging study may be used to inform the refinement of Ad26.RSV.preF drug product release and stability specifications.Clinical Trial Registration:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04453202

Initial Outcomes following Fresh Meniscus Allograft Transplantation in the Knee.

Based on recent evidence-based advances in meniscus allograft transplantation (MAT), fresh (viable) meniscus allografts have a potential for mitigating key risk factors associated with MAT failure, and preclinical and clinical data have verified the safety of fresh meniscus allografts as well as possible efficacy advantages compared to fresh-frozen meniscus allografts. The objective of this study was to prospectively assess clinical outcomes for the initial cohort of patients undergoing MAT using fresh meniscus allografts at our center. Patients who were prospectively enrolled in a dedicated registry were included for analyses when they had undergone primary MAT using a fresh meniscus allograft for treatment of medial and/or lateral meniscus deficiency with at least 1-year follow-up data recorded. Forty-five patients with a mean final follow-up of 47.8 months (range = 12-90) were analyzed. Mean patient age was 30.7 years (range = 15-60), mean BMI was 29.7 kg/m2 (range = 19-48), and 14 patients (31%) were female. In total, 28 medial, 13 lateral, and 4 combined medial and lateral MATs with 23 concurrent ligament reconstructions and 2 concurrent osteotomies were included. No local or systemic adverse events or complications related to MAT were reported for any patient in the study. Treatment success rate for all patients combined was 91.1% with 3 patients requiring MAT revision and 1 patient requiring arthroplasty. Treatment failures occurred 8 to 34 months after MAT and all involved the medial meniscus. None of the variables assessed were significantly different between treatment success versus treatment failure cohorts. Taken together, the data suggest that the use of fresh (viable) meniscus allografts can be considered a safe and effective option for medial and lateral meniscus allograft transplantation. When transplanted using double bone plug suspensory fixation with meniscotibial ligament reconstruction, fresh MATs were associated with a 91% success rate, absence of local or systemic adverse events or complications, and statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in patient-reported measures of pain and function at a mean of 4 years postoperatively.

Safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of ZR-202-CoV and ZR-202a-CoV recombinant vaccines compared with ComirnatyⓇ: A randomized, observer-blind, controlled, phase 1 study

ZR-202-CoV and ZR-202a-CoV are novel recombinant vaccines containing 25 µg of the prototype (Wuhan strain) or B.1.351 strain (Beta variant) SARS-CoV-2 S-protein expressed in CHO cells, respectively, adjuvanted with Al(OH)3 and CpG-ODN. We assessed their safety and immunogenicity in this Phase I, randomized, observer-blind, controlled study in Mali. Sixty healthy 18-55-year-old adults randomized 1:1:1 received two doses of ZR-202-CoV, ZR-202a-CoV, or ComirnatyⓇ 28 days apart. Primary outcome measures were solicited and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) including AESI (Adverse Events of Special Interest); secondary outcome was immunogenicity measured as SARS-CoV-2 specific neutralizing antibodies. Participants were followed up for 1 year. Injection site pain and headache were the most frequent solicited local and systemic AEs, respectively. No unsolicited AEs or SAEs related to vaccination were reported during the study period. Although most participants had detectable neutralizing antibodies at baseline robust immune responses were observed in all vaccine groups after the first dose with no further increase after the second dose. Cross-neutralizing antibody responses against Beta, Delta, and Omicron BA.5 variants were similar in magnitude after ZR-202-CoV, ZR-202a-CoV and ComirnatyⓇ. Similar reactogenicity and immunogenicity profiles of ZR-202-CoV, ZR-202a-CoV and ComirnatyⓇ support further clinical investigation in a wider population.

A Phase 1/2a Study Evaluating Safety and Immunogenicity of Ad26.RSV.preF in RSV-seronegative Toddlers Aged 12-24 Months.

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) causes serious illness in children. The Ad26.RSV.preF vaccine candidate was immunogenic with acceptable safety in a phase 1/2a study of RSV-seropositive children. Here, we assessed its safety and immunogenicity in RSV-seronegative children. In this randomized, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2a study (NCT03606512; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03606512), RSV-seronegative toddlers aged 12-24 months received Ad26.RSV.preF (2.5 × 1010 viral particles) or placebo on days 1, 29, and 57 (a meningococcal vaccine [Nimenrix] could substitute for day 57 placebo). Primary endpoints were solicited local and systemic adverse events (AEs; 7 days after each vaccination), unsolicited AEs (28 days postvaccination), and serious AEs (first vaccination until study end). Participants were monitored for RSV-respiratory tract infection to assess infection rates and for severe RSV-lower respiratory tract infection as an indication of enhanced disease. RSV-A2 neutralizing, RSV (A and B) preF binding, and RSV postF immunoglobulin G-binding antibodies were evaluated on days 1 (predose), 8, and 85, and after RSV season 1. Thirty-eight participants were enrolled and vaccinated (Ad26.RSV.preF, n = 20; placebo, placebo/Nimenrix, n = 18). Solicited AEs were more common following Ad26.RSV.preF than placebo; most were mild/moderate. No vaccine-related serious AEs were reported. Five of 19 participants receiving Ad26.RSV.preF and 2/18 receiving placebo or placebo/Nimenrix had confirmed RSV-respiratory tract infection or RSV-associated otitis media; none were considered severe. At the final season 1 study visit, most Ad26.RSV.preF recipients had ≥2-fold increases from baseline in RSV-A2 neutralizing, RSV A and B preF binding, and RSV postF antibodies. Ad26.RSV.preF was well tolerated and immunogenic in RSV-seronegative toddlers.

Delphi study for developing a checklist of adverse events associated with acupotomy

BackgroundAcupotomy, a more invasive procedure than acupuncture, involves the use of a thicker needle with an integrated knife at the tip, necessitating safety research. We aimed to define relevant adverse events (AEs) and create a standardized form of the ACUPOtomy-related AEs CHECKlist (ACUPOCHECK). MethodsBefore conducting the Delphi process, a systematic review and pilot prospective study were conducted to gather information on previously reported AEs. Using these data, pilot versions of the ACUPOCHECK and Delphi questionnaires were developed. The Delphi questionnaire involved selecting types of AE for inclusion, establishing separate criteria for acupotomy-related AEs, and achieving a consensus on AE assessment. Thirteen Korean doctors with experience in acupotomy or AE research were recruited to participate in each Delphi round. Consensus was considered to have been reached if the critical value for the content validity ratio met or exceeded 0.538. ResultsThe final ACUPOCHECK was developed using four rounds of the Delphi method and one face-to-face consensus meeting. It included 12 local AEs (pain, hemorrhage, bruise, hematoma, edema, pruritus, rash, infection, nerve damage, dysesthesia, movement impairment, and pneumothorax) and 14 systemic AEs (disease aggravation, needle fatigue, sleepiness, procedural nausea, procedural vomiting, procedural headache, procedural dizziness, sweating, procedural shock, syncope, dyspnea, procedural pain, sleep disorder, and postprocedural infection). Separate criteria were established for pain, hemorrhage and bruising: pain was defined as pain that occurrs during daily activities and persists for longer than 72 h, hemorrhage as bleeding that continues for ≥ 3 min despite pressure application, and bruising as having a bruise with a diameter of ≥ 3 cm. Open-ended descriptions were allowed for AEs not covered by the checklist, and severity and causality were assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events and modified World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Center criteria. ConclusionACUPOCHECK provides a standardization framework that can help research on traditional practices as well as new tools and techniques that are more invasive and may cause more severe AEs. Subsequent studies will use ACUPOCHECK to develop rational safety guidelines for acupotomy techniques.Please cite this article as: Jun H, Lee H, Yoon SH, Kwon CY, Jeon D, Lee JH, Leem J. Delphi study for developing a checklist of adverse events associated with acupotomy. J Integr Med. 2024; 22(5): 579–587.

Safety and immunogenicity of the live-attenuated hRVFV-4s vaccine against Rift Valley fever in healthy adults: a dose-escalation, placebo-controlled, first-in-human, phase 1 randomised clinical trial

Rift Valley fever virus, a pathogen to ruminants, camelids, and humans, is an emerging mosquito-borne bunyavirus currently endemic to Africa and the Arabian Peninsula. Although animals are primarily infected via mosquito bites, humans mainly become infected following contact with infected tissues or fluids of infected animals. There is an urgent need for adequate countermeasures, especially for humans, because effective therapeutics or vaccines are not yet available. Here we assessed the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a next-generation, four-segmented, live-attenuated vaccine candidate, referred to as hRVFV-4s, in humans. A first-in-human, single-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was done in Belgium in which a single dose of hRVFV-4s was administered to healthy volunteers aged 18-45 years. Participants were randomly assigned using an interactive web response system. The study population encompassed 75 participants naive to Rift Valley fever virus infection, divided over three dosage groups (cohorts) of 25 participants each. All participants were followed up until 6 months. Using a staggered dose escalating approach, 20 individuals of each cohort were injected in the deltoid muscle of the non-dominant arm with either 104 (low dose), 105 (medium dose), or 106 (high dose) of 50% tissue culture infectious dose of hRVFV-4s as based on animal data, and five individuals per cohort received formulation buffer as a placebo. Primary outcome measures in the intention-to-treat population were adverse events and tolerability. Secondary outcome measures were vaccine-induced viraemia, vaccine virus shedding, Rift Valley fever virus nucleocapsid antibody responses (with ELISA), and neutralising antibody titres. Furthermore, exploratory objectives included the assessment of cellular immune responses by ELISpot. The trial was registered with the EU Clinical Trials Register, 2022-501460-17-00. Between August and December, 2022, all 75 participants were vaccinated. No serious adverse events or vaccine-related severe adverse events were reported. Pain at the injection site (51 [85%] of 60 participants) was most frequently reported as solicited local adverse event, and headache (28 [47%] of 60) and fatigue (28 [47%] of 60) as solicited systemic adverse events in the active group. No vaccine virus RNA was detected in any of the blood, saliva, urine, or semen samples. Rift Valley fever virus nucleocapsid antibody responses were detected in most participants who were vaccinated with hRVFV-4s (43 [72%] of 60 on day 14) irrespective of the administered dose. In contrast, a clear dose-response relationship was observed for neutralising antibodies on day 28 with four (20%) of 20 participants responding in the low-dose group, 13 (65%) of 20 responding in the medium-dose group, and all participants (20 [100%] of 20) responding in the high-dose group. Consistent with the antibody responses, cellular immune responses against the nucleocapsid protein were detected in all dose groups, whereas a more dose-dependent response was observed for the Gn and Gc surface glycoproteins. Neutralising antibody titres declined over time, whereas nucleocapsid antibody responses remained relatively stable for at least 6 months. The hRVFV-4s vaccine showed a high safety profile and excellent tolerability across all tested dose regimens, eliciting robust immune responses, particularly with the high-dose administration. The findings strongly support further clinical development of this candidate vaccine for human use. The Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations with support from the EU Horizon 2020 programme.

Real-World Use of Off-Label MVASI in the Treatment of Patients With Neovascular AMD and DME.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab-awwb in the off-label treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (n-AMD) and diabetic macular edema (DME). All patients with n-AMD and DME treated in the maintenance phase according to the "treat and extend" strategy, who underwent forced drug substitution from bevacizumab to bevacizumab-awwb from October 2022 to April 2023 at the Tor Vergata Polyclinic in Rome, were evaluated in a retrospective study. The primary outcome was changes in central retinal thickness (CRT) over time following drug substitution. The secondary outcomes were variations in drug durability, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and retinal fluid, and the incidence of drug-related local and systemic serious adverse events. Of 80 eyes of 76 patients with n-AMD and 55 eyes of 44 patients with DME included, before and after drug substitution, the average CRT did not statistically differ; the proportion of patients within time intervals of q8, q12, and q16 was not different; and the mean BCVA remained constant. Of a cumulative 3496 bevacizumab-awwb treatments (2154 for patients with n-AMD and 1342 for patients with DME), no local severe complications were detected. Out of a total of 544 patients (342 affected by n-AMD and 202 affected by DME), no serious adverse events were reported. In our cohort of patients with n-AMD and DME in the maintenance phase, bevacizumab-awwb seems to represent a viable and cost-effective intravitreal therapy with comparable efficacy and safety to the originator. This study provides a preliminary assessment of the efficacy and safety of intravitreal bevacizumab-awwb, which is widely used off-label in retinal vascular diseases.

Efficacy of Local Anesthesia for Radial Artery Puncture Pain: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to assist clinicians in determining the optimal patient-specific method of analgesia during radial artery puncture by comparing radial artery puncture procedural pain. We included randomized controlled trials that assessed the prophylactic efficacy of local anesthesia for radial artery puncture-associated pain. We searched the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online in January 2023, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in January 2023, the Excerpta Medica Database in December 2022, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Platform Search Portal in January 2023, and ClinicalTrials.gov in January 2023. We synthesized the pain scores (0-100 scale) using the frequentist random-effects NMA model. We evaluated the confidence in each outcome using the CINeMA tool (https://cinema.ispm.unibe.ch/). We conducted an NMA of 1,619 patients across 14 studies on pain scores during radial artery puncture-related procedures for 12 interventions. Compared with placebo, mepivacaine infiltration and lidocaine spray probably reduce pain (mean difference (MD): -47.67, 95% confidence interval (CI): -61.45 to -33.89, confidence rating (CR): moderate; MD: -27.38, 95% CI: -37.53 to -17.22, CR: moderate). Of the 32 studies included, none reported systemic adverse events, such as anaphylaxis or local anesthetic systemic toxicity, or severe local adverse events. In conclusion, mepivacaine infiltration and lidocaine spray probably reduce the pain associated with radial artery puncture more than other local anesthesia.

New Russian Trivalent Hepatitis B Vaccine (Bubo®­-Unigep): Reactogenicity, Safety and Immunological Efficacy

Relevance. In Russia, phase III of clinical trials of the domestic trivalent vaccine Bubo®-Unigep, containing protective antigens that provide protection against “wild” forms of the hepatitis B virus subtypes ay and ad, as well as the determinant of serotype ay with the G145R mutation, has been completed. Аim. Evaluation of the effect of the new recombinant polyvaccine against hepatitis B «Bubo-Unigep» on vital functions and laboratory parameters in previously unvaccinated individuals in an adult healthy population. Materials and methods. A randomized multicenter clinical study was conducted to assess the reactogenicity, safety and immunogenicity of Bubo®-Unigep (CJSC NPC «COMBIOTECH») in previously unvaccinated healthy adults (n = 166). The study performed according to the protocol developed by the contract research organization «R&amp;D Pharma» at eight clinical centers located in Russian Federation. Results and discussion. Analysis of the studied parameters throughout the study (frequency and severity of adverse events, physical examination data of volunteers with assessment of vital signs, laboratory test results, etc.) made it possible to establish a high safety profile of Bubo®-Unigep vaccine, which turned out to be virtually areactogenic without causing development of targeted local and systemic post-vaccination adverse events. Conclusion. The wide range of specificity of the immune response, along with the high safety and reactogenicity of the Bubo®-Unigep vaccine, the production of which can be carried out through a full technological cycle without the use of imported substances, will increase the effectiveness of hepatitis B prevention.

Comparative safety of monovalent and bivalent mRNA COVID-19 booster vaccines in adolescents aged 12 to 17 years in the Republic of Korea.

This study analyzed the safety of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) bivalent and monovalent booster vaccines, including the frequency of adverse events (AEs) such as myocarditis and pericarditis, in adolescents aged 12 to 17 years in the Republic of Korea. We aimed to share the safety profile of the COVID-19 bivalent vaccine booster doses. We analyzed the frequencies of AEs reported to the COVID-19 vaccination management system (CVMS) or self-reported through the text message survey (TMS). Diagnostic eligibility and causality with vaccines were compared using odds ratios (ORs) by vaccine type, and incidence rates per 100,000 person-days were calculated for confirmed cases of myocarditis and pericarditis following monovalent and bivalent booster doses. In the CVMS, the AE reporting rate (per 100,000 doses) was lower after the bivalent booster (66.5) than after the monovalent booster (264.6). Among the AEs reported for both monovalent and bivalent vaccines 98.3% were non-serious and 1.7% were serious. According to the TMS, both local and systemic AEs were reported less frequently after the bivalent vaccination than after the monovalent vaccination in adolescents aged 12 to 17 years (p<0.001). The incidence rates per 100,000 person-days for confirmed myocarditis/pericarditis following monovalent and bivalent booster doses were 0.03 and 0.05, respectively; this difference was not statistically significant (OR, 1.797; 95% confidence interval, 0.210-15.386). AEs in 12- to 17-year-olds following the bivalent booster were less frequent than those following the monovalent booster in the Republic of Korea, and no major safety issues were identified. However, the reporting rates for AEs were low.