Stallion semen cryopreservation is an important procedure for conservation of genetic resources having a relevant roll in the horse industry. Distribution of commercial extenders is difficult due to the necessity of keeping them frozen during transport. The aim of this work was to compare after-thawing results of two commercial frozen extenders offered worldwide (C1 and C2) with two novel lyophilized freezing extenders produced in Brazil (STAR and MX3) which can be stored at room temperature up to one year. One ejaculate of each of 28 mature stallions from three breeds (Quarter Horse, Criollo and Mangalarga Marchador) was diluted with milk-based extender (Equiplus, Minitube) to 100 × 106 total sperm/ml and split into four 50ml centrifugation tubes. After centrifugation (600 g x 20’), the remaining pellet of each tube was resuspended with one of the four extenders to a concentration of 200 × 106 total sperm/ml. From each aliquot, semen was frozen with two different freezing curves named FC1 (Room temperature + 20’ at 5˚C into refrigerator + 20’ followed by LN2 vapor and plunging) and FC2 (60’ at 5˚C). After freezing, straws were thawed at 37˚C/30 sec and total motility (TM) was checked using optical microscopy in a blind test by three skilled vets. Means± standard deviation for total motility after freezing-thawing were: FC1 (C1=46.54±19.44;C2=35.30±21.32; STAR=51.15±21.18 and MX3=46.17±20.50) and FC2 (C1=51.55±21.92; C2=41.61±19.79; STAR=44.85±16.30 and MX3=49.21±15.98). Statistical analysis was performed (ANOVA followed by Tukey test) with 5% significance. No differences on average motility among extenders within or between curves was seen. Within each curve, the distribution of best motilities of each extender considering individual stallions was FC1 (C1=6, C2=2, STAR=14, MX3=6) and FC2 (C1=14, C2=4, STAR=4, MX3=6). The results show similarity on average motility for all extenders tested. Considering FC1, the lyophilized extenders got better motility in 20 of 28 stallions. In FC2, C1 performed better (14 of 28 stallions), while STAR and MX3 were comparable with the commercial extender C2. MX3 had similar performance in both curves and STAR reached better thawed motility in FC1 (14 of 28 stallions) when compared with FC2 (4 of 28 stallions). The highest motility obtained after the freezing-test revealed a balance between FC1 and FC2 with 13 and 15 stallions, respectively. Individual variation and freezing curve splitting were similar for both kinds of extenders, but further investigations are needed to clarify the better results of STAR when using faster curves. In conclusion, lyophilized extenders can be a good option to obtain similar semen quality without restrictions of frozen extender shipment and storage.
Read full abstract