Living Donor Nephrectomy Research Articles

Laterality of live-donor nephrectomy: does it have a urologic impact on post-donation pregnancy?

BackgroundOur center policy is to promote right nephrectomy for pre-menopausal live donor donors. This is based on the traditional belief that ureteral obstruction and subsequent urinary tract infections (UTIs) of post-donation pregnancies would be more frequent among female donors with a solitary right (compared to left) kidney. Studies that support or dismiss our policy are lacking. Therefore, we conducted this study.Methods100 donors who had post-donation pregnancy were included. They underwent an updated clinical, laboratory and ultrasound assessment. They were classified into two groups: right and left nephrectomy groups. Both groups were compared relative to pre- and post-donation data, urinary troubles during or after post-donation pregnancies as well as their current kidney function.ResultsRight nephrectomy was carried-out in 60 donors (60%). Post-donation acute pyelonephritis was not reported in either group. Unexpectedly, right nephrectomy group had a slightly higher (yet insignificant) lower UTIs during post-donation pregnancy. Furthermore, obstructive uropathy {two donors) and end stage renal disease (one donor) were only reported among right nephrectomy group. Both groups were comparable in terms of their current kidney function.ConclusionDespite that the endeavor to retrieve the right rather than the left kidney among premenopausal women could give them the benefit of doubt in regard to possible obstructive uropathy and UTIs during their subsequent pregnancies, this policy is likely an overdoing practice. Larger-scale studies are needed.

The learning curve for modified hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy

BackgroundWe aimed to introduce our modified hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy (HARPLDN) technique and define the learning curve.MethodsOne hundred thirty-eight kidney donors who underwent modified HARPLDN by the same surgeon between May 2015 and March 2022 were included. A cumulative sum (CUSUM) learning curve analysis was performed with the total operation time as the study outcome.ResultsIn total, the mean operative time was 138.2 ± 32.1 min. The median warm ischemic time (WIT) and estimated blood loss were 90 s and 50 ml, respectively. The learning curve for the total operative time was best modeled as a second-order polynomial with the following equation: CUSUMOT (min) = (–0.09 case number2) + (12.88 case number) – 67.77 (R2 = 0.7875; p<0.05). The CUSUM learning curve included the following three unique phases: phase 1 (the initial 41 cases), representing the initial learning curve; phase 2 (the middle 43 cases), representing expert competence; and phase 3 (the final 54 cases), representing mastery. The overall 6-month graft survival rate was 99.3%, with 94.9% immediate onset of graft function without delayed graft function and 0.7% ureteral complications.ConclusionsOur modified method is safe and effective for living donor nephrectomy and has the advantages of a shorter operating time and optimized WIT. The surgeon can become familiar with the modified HARPLDN after 41 cases and effectively perform the next 97 cases.

Living donor kidney nephrectomy: analysis of trends and outcomes from a contemporary national dataset

ObjectivesTo analyze the temporal trends and perioperative and long-term outcomes of living donor kidney nephrectomy in the United States. MethodsThe PearlDiverTM Mariner database (Pearl-Diver Technologies, Colorado Springs, CO, USA) was used for our retrospective analysis. The data were identified using ICD-9/10 codes, as well as CPT codes. Continuous and categorical variables were compared using 2-sided tests. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify predictors of 5-year ESRD. ResultsA total of 6333 patients were identified (median age 54, IQR 46-62 years) from 2010 to April 2022. A greater percentage of living donor nephrectomies were performed by general surgeons (56.1%), followed by transplant surgeons (16.5%) and urologists (14.7%). Unfortunately, physician specialty was not reported for the remaining patients. The MIS exceeded open surgery in each specialty group and inpatient setting. The significant predictors of ESRD were male, preoperative DM and hypertension, tobacco smoking, perioperative AKI and younger age at the time of kidney donation. ConclusionsMIS represents the main surgical approach for organ procurement. A meticulous selection process for donors and subsequent close monitoring are necessary to minimize the putative consequences of donor nephrectomy.

Right vs Left Living Donor Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Donor and Recipient Outcomes

Right vs Left Living Donor Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Donor and Recipient Outcomes

Relationship between surgical difficulty and postoperative complications of hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy and establishment of prediction model

BackgroundFew studies have systematically explored the factors influencing the difficulty of hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy. To investigate the relationship between the difficulty of hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy and postoperative complications of the donor as well as the recipient, and then build a model for predicting the difficulty of surgery.MethodsIn this study, 60 patients who underwent hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy by the same surgeon from September 2022 to March 2024 were included as the modeling group. 20 patients operated on by another surgeon served as the external validation group. The subjective score (1–3 points) of surgical difficulty was used as the quantitative index of surgical difficulty. Pearson and Spearman correlation tests were used to explore the correlation between preoperative data and surgical difficulty scores of kidney donors, and finally built a prediction model through multiple linear regression analysis.ResultsWith the increase in the difficulty of operation, both donors and recipients’ complications were increased. Linear regression analysis showed that only the number of renal arteries, visceral fat thickness and MAP score were independent risk factors for the difficulty of hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy. The prediction equation is as follows: Difficulty score = 0.584*Number of renal arteries + 0.731*MAP score + 0.110*visceral fat thickness.ConclusionsDonors with higher surgical difficulty are more likely to have serious complications after surgery as well as the recipient. We also established a reliable prediction model for the difficulty of hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

Learning curve analysis for hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: an analysis of 96 consecutive cases performed by a trained gastrointestinal surgeon.

This study aims to analyze the learning curve of hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy (HLDN) conducted by a trained gastrointestinal surgeon. A retrospective analysis was performed on the perioperative clinical data of 96 consecutive patients who underwent HLDN from May 2013 to March 2023. The learning curve was evaluated using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) test based on operation time and risk-adjusted CUSUM for postoperative complications. Patients were divided into three groups (novice, development, and competency phases) based on changes in operation time. Patient demographics and perioperative outcomes were compared between each group. Among the patients, 35 were male, with a mean age of 48.9 ± 11.3 years and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 24.5 ± 3.2 kg/m2. The novice phase (phase 1) included the first 30 cases, with the development phase (phase 2) up to the 65th case. Operation times were significantly different across phases, averaging 263.2 ± 33.4, 211.1 ± 34.4, and 161.1 ± 31.3 minutes for phases 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P < 0.001). Blood loss decreased gradually across phases (phase 1, 264.7 ± 144.4 mL; phase 2, 239.7 ± 166.3 mL; phase 3, 198.8 ± 103.5 mL), though not statistically significant. BMI impacted operation time only in phase 1. Overall postoperative complications occurred in 13 cases (Clavien-Dindo grade I, 4 cases; grade II, 9 cases), with no significant differences across phases. HLDN can be safely performed by a trained gastrointestinal surgeon, with approximately 30 cases needed to achieve proficiency.

Outcomes and Cost of Donor Nephrectomy Across Surgical Specialties and Operative Approaches.

Live donor nephrectomy (LDN) is performed by various specialty surgeons, including urologists, general surgeons, and transplant surgeons. However, national practice patterns and outcomes associated with surgeon specialty have not been previously explored. Here, we investigate surgeon specialty trends, perioperative complications, hospital length of stay, cost, and charge for LDN according to surgeon specialty. Patients who underwent LDN from 2000 to quarter 1 of 2020 were identified in the Premier Healthcare Database. Associations between physician specialty and 3-month complications, hospital length of stay, institutional cost, and patient charge for LDN procedures were examined using multivariable regression. We identified 11,418 patients who underwent LDN. Of these cases, 3387 (29.7%) were performed by urologists, 3127 (27.4%) by transplant surgeons, 3928 (34.4%) by general surgeons, and 976 (8.5%) by other specialties. In 2000, urologists performed 35.92% of LDNs, decreasing to 18.91% by 2019 (P < .001 for trend). In the last 5 years, we found no significant difference in complications or length of stay according to surgeon specialty. LDNs performed by a urologist ($57,289, 95% CI $49,292-$66,582) were associated with lower patient charges than those performed by a general surgeon ($68,501, 95% CI $59,090-$79,412) or transplant surgeon ($62,639, 95% CI $53,993-$72,670). From 2000 to 2019, the proportion of LDNs performed by urologists significantly decreased, while the proportion for transplant surgeons significantly increased, with no significant differences in complications or length of stay across specialties. However, surgeries performed by urologists cost hospitals less and had lower charges for patients.

Comparison of analgesic effectiveness between nefopam and propacetamol in living kidney donors following rectus sheath block after hand-assisted living donor nephrectomy: a prospective, randomized controlled trial

BackgroundNefopam and propacetamol are the most commonly used analgesics in postoperative multimodal analgesic regimens. Distinct mechanisms are involved in each drug’s anti-nociceptive effects. No studies have compared pain relief efficacy between the two drugs in patients undergoing transplantation surgery. Here, we investigated whether the administration of nefopam or propacetamol to healthy living kidney donors who underwent rectus sheath block (RSB) for parietal pain could reduce the subsequent opioid dose necessary to produce adequate analgesia.MethodsThis prospective, randomized controlled trial included 72 donors undergoing elective hand-assisted living donor nephrectomy into two groups: propacetamol (n = 36) and nefopam (n = 36). Intraoperative RSB was performed in all enrolled donors. The primary outcome was the total volume of intravenous opioid-based patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) used on postoperative day 1 (POD 1). Additionally, the Numeric Rating Scale scores for flank (visceral) and umbilicus (parietal) pain at rest and during coughing were compared, and the Korean adaptation of the Quality of Recovery-15 Questionnaire (QoR-15 K) was evaluated on POD 1.ResultsBoth groups had similar preoperative and intraoperative characteristics. On POD 1, the total amount of PCA infusion was significantly lower in the nefopam group than in the propacetamol group (44.5 ± 19.3 mL vs. 70.2 ± 29.0 mL; p < 0.001). This group also reported lower pain scores at the flank and umbilical sites and required fewer rescue doses of fentanyl in the post-anesthesia care unit. However, pain scores and fentanyl consumption in the ward were comparable between groups. The QoR-15 K scores were similar between groups; there were substantial improvements in breathing, pain severity, and anxiety/depression levels in the nefopam group. The incidences of postoperative complications, including sweating and tachycardia, were similar between groups.ConclusionCompared with propacetamol, nefopam provides a greater analgesic effect for visceral pain and enhances the effects of blocks that reduce the opioid requirement in living kidney donors with parietal pain managed by RSB.Trial registrationThe trial was registered prior to patient enrollment in the clinical trial database using the Clinical Research Information Service (registration no. KCT0007351, Date of registration 03/06/2022).

Robotic performance metrics model fellow proficiency in living donor nephrectomy

Robotic performance metrics model fellow proficiency in living donor nephrectomy

#2132 Recipient outcomes after laparoscopic versus open living donor nephrectomy: a propensity score-matched cohort study

Abstract Background and Aims Kidney transplantation is the optimal treatment for end-stage renal disease. To meet the growing demand for kidney allografts and to ensure the well-being of donors, laparoscopic nephrectomy has been adopted leading to superior donor outcomes. However, data on recipient outcomes of laparoscopically retrieved grafts are underreported. The aim of the study is to estimate the impact of laparoscopic compared to open living donor nephrectomy (LDN, ODN) on recipient outcomes in the first-year post-transplant. Method This was an observational cohort study of primary data on 396 recipients who had undergone living kidney transplantation from January 2011 to December 2021 at the Clinic of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation of ‘Laiko’ hospital. Since October 2018 laparoscopic surgery has supplanted ODN in the reporting center. Graft function, the risk of adverse events, patient and graft survival within the first-year post-transplantation, were evaluated. A propensity score analysis was applied (2:1 nearest-neighbor matching, with a caliper width of 0.05). As a robustness check, the analysis was rerun on the sub-groups of low and high immunological risk patients. Results After propensity score matching, 389 patients were analyzed. One-year post-transplantation, renal function (−0.074 mg/dl, p: 0.063) patient (99.44% vs 100%, p: 0.27) and graft (99.43% vs 100%, p: 0.13) survival were statistically equal among LDN and ODN recipients. Laparoscopically retrieved grafts demonstrated statistically higher risk of delayed graft function (10.1%, p: 0.032) and higher risk for transfusion (12.9%, p:0.022). The risk for acute rejection, surgical complications and infections (Fig. 1), as well as the length of hospital stay did not differ between the two groups. Kidney function at one year was similar in LDN and ODN patients, regardless of the immunological risk. Low immunological risk patients demonstrated comparable risk of adverse events in the first post-transplant year. High-immunological risk patients after LDN after LDN exhibited greater risk for reoperation (16%, p: 0.0078) urologic complications (19.6%, p: 0.042) and bacterial infections (7.1%, p: 0.027) compared to ODN recipients during the first year after transplantation. Conclusion The results indicate that one-year post-transplantation, renal function, patient and graft survival are equivalent among recipients of allografts procured either laparoscopically or by open surgery, with similar risk of adverse events.

Robotic living donor nephrectomy is associated with reduced post-operative opioid use compared to hand-assisted laparoscopic approach.

Robotic donor nephrectomy (RDN) has emerged as a safe alternative to laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN). Having previously demonstrated comparable efficacy, this study aims to examine postoperative analgesia use (opioid and non-opioid) in the two groups. We conducted a retrospective review of 300 living donor nephrectomies performed at our center, comparing 150 RDN's with a contemporary cohort of 150 hand-assisted LDN's. In addition to clinical and demographic information, data on postoperative inpatient opioid and non-opioid analgesia (from patient's arrival to the surgical floor after surgery till the time of discharge) was collected. Opioid dosages were standardized by conversion to morphine milligram equivalents (MME). All patients were managed post-operatively under a standardized ERAS pathway for living donor nephrectomy patients. There were no significant differences in donor age, gender, and BMI between RDN and LDN groups. Total post-operative opioid use (MME's) was significantly lower in RDN patients (RDN 27.1 vs. LDN 46.3; P < 0.0001). Breakdown of opioid use with post-operative (POD) day demonstrated significantly lower use in RDN group on POD1 (RDN 8.6 vs. LDN 17.0; P < 0.05), and POD2 (RDN 3.9 vs LDN 10; P < 0.05). RDN patients had a shorter post-operative length of stay (LOS) (RDN 1.69days vs. LDN 1.98; P = 0.0003). There were no differences between groups in non-opioid medication use, complications, and readmission rates. RDN has comparable safety to hand-assist LDN and offers additional benefits of lower postoperative opioid requirement and a shorter hospital LOS.

Néphrectomie pour don de rein : quel système utiliser pour la ligature de l’artère rénale ? Aspects réglementaires et résultats de l’enquête nationale du CTAFU

Polymer Locking Clips (Weck* Hem-o-lok*, Teleflex Medical) are widely used for the vascular control during laparoscopic nephrectomy. However, those clips are contraindicated for use in ligating the renal artery during laparoscopic nephrectomies in living donor patients since 2005. We reviewed regulatory aspects, meta-analysis and guidelines published on the means used to ligate the renal artery during laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy. We although investigated among 31 French kidney transplant centers about their technic to occlude the renal artery. This survey was compared to those previously published in North America and in Europe.

Laparoscopic Right Donor Nephrectomy: A Two-Center Comparative Study.

Introduction As the field of laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy (LLDN) has progressed over the years, there has been a growing emphasis on optimizing surgical techniques and outcomes to ensure the safety and well-being of living kidney donors. The early experiences with right LLDN, marked by challenges and concerns such as high conversion rates to open surgery and early graft loss due to technical reasons, prompted a reevaluation of the approach towardright-sided donor nephrectomies. In this article, we aim to compare the safety and efficacy of right LLDNto left LLDN performed in our centers and to provide valuable insights that can ultimately enhance patient outcomes and ensure the well-being of living organ donors. Methods Between January 2018 and January 2022, we conducted 16 cases of right LLDNand compared them with 134 cases of left LLDN procedures done in the Kingdom of Bahrain and Jordan over the same time period. We analyzed differences in donor age, sex, operative time, warm ischemia time (WIT), graft function, complications, and conversion to open technique. Patient data and surgical outcomes were extracted from medical records and surgical databases. Statistical analysis was conducted to identify significant differences between the two groups. Categorical variables such as complications and safety outcomes were compared using chi-square tests and logistic regression analysis. The primary outcomes of interest included safety metrics such as complication rates, vascular complications, graft loss, and postoperative serum creatinine levels for the recipients. Results Our study showed similar demographics in both groups. However, the operative time was shorter for the left LLDN, with 81 minutes compared to 96 minutes for the right. Warm ischemia times (WITs) were comparable at 4.5 minutes for the left and 5.2 minutes for the right. There was less incidence of delayed graft function on the left side (none in the left group compared to one case in the right group). Both groups had similar six-month graft function in terms of serum creatinine levels (0.98 mg/dL for the left and 1.2 mg/dL for the right), hospital stays (2.5 days for the left and 2.8 days for the right), and estimated blood loss (EBL) (90 mL for the left and 50 mL for the right). Additionally, no blood transfusions were required in either group, but there was one case of conversion to open surgery in the right LLDN group. Conclusion Our data confirm the safety and efficacy of the right LLDN, consistent with the current literature. This increases the cumulative evidence supporting the use of laparoscopic retrieval on the right side when indicated.

Prediction models for postoperative renal function after living donor nephrectomy: a systematic review.

Living-donor nephrectomy (LDN) is the most valuable source of organs for kidney transplantation worldwide. The current preoperative evaluation of a potential living donor candidate does not take into account formal estimation of postoperative renal function decline after surgery using validated prediction models. The aim of this study was to summarize the available models to predict the mid- to long-term renal function following LDN, aiming to support both clinicians and patients during the decision-making process. A systematic review of the English-language literature was conducted following the principles highlighted by the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines and following the PRISMA 2020 recommendations. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO on December 10, 2022 (registration ID: CRD42022380198). In the qualitative analysis we selected the models including only preoperative variables. After screening and eligibility assessment, six models from six studies met the inclusion criteria. All of them relied on retrospective patient cohorts. According to PROBAST, all studies were evaluated as high risk of bias. The models included different combinations of variables (ranging between two to four), including donor-/kidney-related factors, and preoperative laboratory tests. Donor age was the variable more often included in the models (83%), followed by history of hypertension (17%), Body Mass Index (33%), renal volume adjusted by body weight (33%) and body surface area (33%). There was significant heterogeneity in the model building strategy, the main outcome measures and the model's performance metrics. Three models were externally validated. Few models using preoperative variables have been developed and externally validated to predict renal function after LDN. As such, the evidence is premature to recommend their use in routine clinical practice. Future research should be focused on the development and validation of user-friendly, robust prediction models, relying on granular large multicenter datasets, to support clinicians and patients during the decision-making process.

Defining Vascular Anatomy of Kidney and Variation among Potential Live Kidney Donors Using Spiral Computed Tomographic Angiography

Introduction This study measured the accuracy of spiral computed tomographic angiography (SCTA) in defining renal vascular anatomy and estimating the prevalence of renal vascular anomalies in live kidney donors. MethodsThis prospective clinical study included 400 live-related-donor nephrectomies from June 2017 to December 2023. Renal vascular anatomy was described after SCTA. Reporting included the number of renal arteries and veins. Analysis was done by considering intraoperative findings as “actual” findings and compared to preoperative SCTA images for their prediction. For donated side kidneys, the prevalence of vascular variations was calculated using surgical and SCTA findings. The non-donated side was evaluated using SCTA alone. ResultsFour-hundred live-donor nephrectomies were performed including 326 left and 74 right-sided cases. Of the 400 kidneys harvested, 429 renal arteries were detected out of which 414 arteries (96.5 %) were predicted by SCTA. Fifteen accessory renal arteries (1-2 mm) were identified at nephrectomy, which was not predicted. In two cases, SCTA was reported to have renal arterial stenosis (multiple in one and in mid-part in the other) which turned out to be normal intraoperatively. Similarly, 417 renal veins were detected in 400 harvested kidneys. Out of these, 408 renal veins (97.8 %) were predicted by SCTA. Two renal arteries were found in 161 Kidneys and three renal arteries were found in seven kidneys. In addition, two renal veins were found in 35 kidneys. ConclusionSpiral computed tomographic angiography provided a reliable and accurate assessment of renal vascular anatomy and its variations in live donor nephrectomy. Small accessory arteries were missed occasionally.

Renal implications of pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery: mechanisms, risk factors, and preventive strategies.

Pneumoperitoneum, which is established for laparoscopic surgery, has systemic implications on the renal system and may contribute to acute kidney injury or postoperative renal dysfunction. Specifically, when the pressure exceeds 10 mmHg, pneumoperitoneum decreases renal blood flow, leading to renal dysfunction and temporary oliguria. The renal effects of pneumoperitoneum stem from both the direct effects of increased intra-abdominal pressure and indirect factors such as carbon dioxide absorption, neuroendocrine influences, and tissue damage resulting from oxidative stress. While pneumoperitoneum can exacerbate renal dysfunction in patients with pre-existing kidney issues, preserving the function of the remaining kidney is crucial in certain procedures such as laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. However, available evidence on the effects of pneumoperitoneum on renal function is limited and of moderate quality. This review focuses on exploring the pathophysiological hypotheses underlying kidney damage, mechanisms leading to oliguria and kidney damage, and fluid management strategies for surgical patients during pneumoperitoneum.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic retroperitoneal donor nephrectomy: a safe and efficient improvement.

Reducing operative injuries is important in living donor nephrectomy. The robot-assisted transperitoneal approach has some advantages than traditional laparoscopic techniques. However, longer operation time and risks of abdominal complications indicate the need for improved techniques. The aim of this study is to present the robot-assisted laparoscopic retroperitoneal donor nephrectomy and evaluate its safety and feasibility. This was a retrospective study. From June 2016 to December 2020, 218living donors underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic retroperitoneal donor nephrectomy. Perioperative data such as operation time, warm ischemia time, length of stay and complications were collected and analyzed. To evaluate the feasibility of this surgical technique, the cumulative summation method was used to construct a learning curve. There were 60male and 158female donors aged 36-72years, with an average age of 53.1 ± 6.8years. Three patients (1.4%) were converted to open surgery. The mean operation time was 115.4 ± 41.9min, the warm ischemia time was 206.6 ± 146.7s, and the length of stay was 4.1 ± 1.4days. Complications were reported in 22 patients (10.1%), three of whom (1.4%) had Clavien‒Dindo IIIa complications. No ileus occurred. No donors were readmitted. Four patients had delayed graft function. The cumulative summation curve showed that the number needed to reach proficiency was 33. The operation time and warm ischemia time after technical proficiency were 100.4 ± 21.6min and 142.5 ± 50.7s, respectively. Robot-assisted laparoscopic retroperitoneal donor nephrectomy is a safe and efficient technique that offers advantages of shorter operation time and no abdominal organ interference.

Lean body mass in living kidney donors impacts postoperative renal function

PurposeA living donor kidney transplant is the optimal treatment for chronic renal impairment. Our objective is to assess if lean skeletal muscle mass and donor factors such as body mass index, hypertension, and age impact on renal function following donor nephrectomy.MethodsPotential donors undergo CT angiography as part of their work-up in our institution. Using dedicated software (Horos®), standardized skeletal muscle area measured at the L3 vertebrae was calculated. When corrected for height, skeletal muscle index can be derived. Skeletal muscle mass index below predefined levels was classified as sarcopenic. The correlation of CT-derived skeletal muscle index and postoperative renal function at 12 months was assessed. Co-variables including donor gender, age, body mass index (BMI), and presence of pre-op hypertension were also assessed for their impact on postoperative renal function.Results275 patients who underwent living donor nephrectomy over 10 years were included. Baseline pre-donation glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and renal function at one year post-op were similar between genders. 29% (n = 82) of patients met the criteria for CT-derived sarcopenia. Sarcopenic patients were more likely to have a higher GFR at one year post-op (69.3 vs 63.9 mL/min/1.73 m2, p < 0.001). The main factors impacting better renal function at one year were the presence of sarcopenia and younger age at donation.ConclusionWhen selecting donors, this study highlights that patients with low skeletal mass are unlikely to underperform in terms of recovery of their renal function postoperatively at one year when compared to patients with normal muscle mass and should not be a barrier to kidney donation.

Health Inequity in Likelihood and Time to Renal Recovery after Living Kidney Donation: Implications for Kidney Health in Black Americans.

Live donor kidney transplantation has been popularized to help mitigate the organ shortage crisis. At the time of living donor nephrectomy, living donors lose 50% of their kidney function or glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Studies have shown that in healthy living donors, the remaining kidney is able to adapt and recover 10% to 25% of postdonation lost GFR. GFR recovery is critical to long-term kidney health, particularly for Black Americans who disproportionately suffer from kidney disease with an incidence 2.5 times White Americans. To date, no study has examined whether health inequities in renal recovery postdonation exist. We retrospectively analyzed 100,121 living kidney donors reported to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients between 1999 and 2021. We estimated GFR (eGFR) using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration 2021 equation and predicted the likelihood (logistic regression) and time (Cox regression) to recovery of 60% and 75% predonation eGFR. Models adjusted for age, sex, race, BMI, and predonation eGFR. Black patients were 47% (adjusted odds ratio 0.53, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.56, p < 0.001) and 43% (adjusted odds ratio 0.57, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.60, p < 0.001) less likely to recover 60% and 75% of predonation eGFR, respectively, compared with their White counterparts. The hazard ratio for time to renal recovery of 60% and 75% of predonation eGFR was 22% (adjusted hazard ratio 0.78, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.80, p < 0.001) and 38% (adjusted hazard ratio 0.62, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.65, p < 0.001) lower, respectively, than White patients. Black living kidney donors were less likely to recover predonation eGFR, and time to renal recovery was significantly longer than their White counterparts. These data highlight the need for enhanced living kidney donor follow-up, particularly for Black living kidney donors who are at greatest future risk of end-stage kidney disease.

Retroperitoneal hernia following laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy: a case report and review of literature

BackgroundThe laparoscopic approach is the standard of care for living-donor nephrectomy. A rare postoperative complication is small bowel obstruction due to a retroperitoneal hernia. We present a case of an incidental finding of a retroperitoneal hernia in a patient with a history of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.Case presentationAn adult male presented with diffuse abdominal pain, vomiting, and obstipation for 12 h. He had undergone laparoscopic donor nephrectomy two months prior. Plain abdominal radiograph revealed a dilated small bowel with homogenous opacity in the left lumbar region. Due to worsening diffuse abdominal pain and a high clinical suspicion of intestinal strangulation and ischemia after conservative management, an exploratory laparotomy was performed. Intraoperatively, an incarcerated small bowel segment herniating through an 8 cm descending mesocolon defect into the retroperitoneal space was discovered, forming a closed-loop obstruction. The bowel segment was reduced, and the mesocolon defect was repaired. The patient was discharged five days postoperatively with good recovery.ConclusionRetroperitoneal hernia following laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy is a rare but significant complication. Mitigation to prevent mesenteric defect creation, routine inspection, and closure of the defect can reduce the risk of hernia. Non-specific abdominal pain in patients with a history of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy prompts rapid imaging evaluation to aid in the early diagnosis of possible retroperitoneal hernia and its intervention.