Living Donor Liver Transplantation Patients Research Articles

Impact of electrical muscle stimulation on serum myostatin level and maintenance of skeletal muscle mass in patients undergoing living-donor liver transplantation: Single-center controlled trial.

Sarcopenia is reportedly associated with a poor prognosis in patients who undergo living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT), most of whom are not able to tolerate muscle strengthening exercise training. Myostatin is one of the myokines and a negative regulator of skeletal muscle growth. The clinical feasibility of an electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) system, which exercises muscle automatically by direct electrical stimulation, has been reported. In this study, we aimed to determine the effect of perioperative application of SIXPAD, which is a type of EMS system, with reference to the serum myostatin and sarcopenia in LDLT patients. Thirty patients scheduled for LDLT were divided into a SIXPAD group (n=16) and a control group (n=14). In the SIXPAD group, EMS was applied to the thighs twice daily. The serum myostatin was measured in samples obtained before use of SIXPAD and immediately before LDLT. The psoas muscle index (PMI) at the level of the third lumbar vertebra and the quadriceps muscle area were compared on computed tomography images before use of SIXPAD and 1month after LDLT. The preoperative serum myostatin was found to be higher in LDLT patients than in healthy volunteers and EMS significantly reduced the serum myostatin. Electrical muscle stimulation prevented a postoperative reduction not only in the area of the quadriceps muscles but also in the PMI despite direct stimulation of the thigh muscles. Stimulation of muscles by EMS decreases the serum myostatin and helps to maintain skeletal muscle in patients who have undergone LDLT.

Peri-operative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adult and pediatric living donor liver transplantation: a single-center experience.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a potential rescue therapy for patients with acute cardiopulmonary dysfunction refractory to conventional treatment. In this study, we described the clinical profiles and outcomes of adult and pediatric living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) patients who received ECMO support during the peri-operative period. From June 1994 to December 2020, eleven out of the 1,812 LDLTs performed at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital required ECMO support: six for respiratory failure, three for cardiogenic shock, and two for refractory septic shock. Comparison between the survivor and non-survivor groups was made. The survival rate for liver transplantation (LT) patients on ECMO support is 36.4%-40% in adults and 33.3% in pediatrics, while the survival rate per indication is as follows: acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (50%), cardiogenic shock (33.3%), and sepsis (0%). Shorter durations of LT-to-ECMO and pre-ECMO mechanical ventilation were observed in the survivor group. On the other hand, we observed persistently elevated total bilirubin levels in non-survivors, while none of the survivors had aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels >1,000 U/L. A higher proportion of non-survivors were on concurrent continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Our experience has proven ECMO's utility during the peri-operative period for both adult and pediatric LDLT patients, more specifically for indications other than septic shock. Further studies are needed to better understand the factors leading to poor outcomes in order to identify patients who will more likely benefit from ECMO.

Phase 1/2 donor antigen specific regulatory T cell-based cell therapy clinical trial to induce operational tolerance in living donor liver transplant patients

Phase 1/2 donor antigen specific regulatory T cell-based cell therapy clinical trial to induce operational tolerance in living donor liver transplant patients

Intention-to-treat analysis for survival benefit of ABO-incompatible living-donor liver transplantation in patients with a high Model for End-stage Liver Disease score

Intention-to-treat analysis for survival benefit of ABO-incompatible living-donor liver transplantation in patients with a high Model for End-stage Liver Disease score

Comparison of invasive and non-invasive measurements of cardiac index and systemic vascular resistance in living-donor liver transplantation: a prospective, observational study

BackgroundBased on the controversy surrounding pulmonary artery catheterization (PAC) in surgical patients, we investigated the interchangeability of cardiac index (CI) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) measurements between ClearSight™ and PAC during living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT).MethodsThis prospective study included consecutively selected LDLT patients. ClearSight™-based CI and SVR measurements were compared with those from PAC at seven LDLT-stage time points. ClearSight™-based systolic (SAP), mean (MAP), and diastolic (DAP) arterial pressures were also compared with those from femoral arterial catheterization (FAC). For the comparison and analysis of ClearSight™ and the reference method, Bland-Altman analysis was used to analyze accuracy while polar and four-quadrant plots were used to analyze the trending ability.ResultsFrom 27 patients, 189 pairs of ClearSight™ and reference values were analyzed. The CI and SVR performance errors (PEs) exhibited poor accuracy between the two methods (51.52 and 51.73%, respectively) in the Bland-Altman analysis. CI and SVR also exhibited unacceptable trending abilities in both the polar and four-quadrant plot analyses. SAP, MAP, and DAP PEs between the two methods displayed favorable accuracy (24.28, 21.18, and 26.26%, respectively). SAP and MAP exhibited acceptable trending ability in the four-quadrant plot between the two methods, but not in the polar plot analyses.ConclusionsDuring LDLT, CI and SVR demonstrated poor interchangeability, while SAP and MAP exhibited acceptable interchangeability between ClearSight™ and FAC.

Effect of Early Enteral Nutrition on Graft Loss After Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

This study aimed to elucidate the effect of early enteral nutrition on graft loss within 12 h after living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using propensity score-matching analysis and subsequently examine the risk factors for graft loss after LDLT. We retrospectively reviewed the data of 467 LDLT patients who were assigned to the early and non-early groups based on the optimal cutoff value of 12 h for the starting time of early enteral nutrition after LDLT to predict graft loss. The 1-year graft survival rate of the early group before propensity score-matching was 92.1%, whereas the 1-year graft survival rate of the non-early group was 86.2%. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups (P=.067). The incidences of early allograft dysfunction (EAD), small-for-size graft (SFSG) syndrome, acute cellular rejection (ACR), and sepsis were not statistically different between the 2 groups (P=.12, .91, .46, and .056, respectively). After propensity score-matching, the 1-year graft survival rate of the early group was 94.4%, whereas the 1-year graft survival rate of the non-early group was 85.4% (P=.034). The incidences of EAD, SFSG syndrome, and ACR were not statistically different between the 2 groups (P=.43, .81, and .24, respectively). However, the incidence of sepsis was statistically different between the 2 groups (non-early: 10.7% vs early: 3.6%, P=.038). Early enteral nutrition within 12 h after LDLT may contribute to better graft survival in LDLT patients by preventing sepsis.

Outcomes and Risk Factors for Liver Transplantation Using Graft-to-Recipient Weight Ratio Less Than 0.8 Graft From Living Donors: Multicentric Cohort Study.

To compare graft survival after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in patients receiving graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) <0.8 versus GRWR≥0.8 grafts and identify risk factors for graft loss using GRWR<0.8 grafts. Favorable outcomes after LDLT using GRWR<0.8 grafts were recently reported; however, these results have not been validated using multicenter data. This multicentric cohort study included 3450 LDLT patients. Graft survival was compared between 1:3 propensity score-matched groups and evaluated using various Cox models in the entire population. Risk factors for graft loss with GRWR<0.8 versus GRWR≥0.8 grafts were explored within various subgroups using interaction analyses, and outcomes were stratified according to the number of risk factors. In total, 368 patients (10.7%) received GRWR<0.8 grafts (GRWR<0.8 group), whereas 3082 (89.3%) received GRWR≥0.8 grafts (GRWR≥0.8 group). The 5-year graft survival rate was significantly lower with GRWR<0.8 grafts than with GRWR≥0.8 grafts (85.2% vs 90.1%, P =0.013). Adjusted hazard ratio for graft loss using GRWR<0.8 grafts in the entire population was 1.66 (95% CI: 1.17-2.35, P =0.004). Risk factors exhibiting significant interactions with GRWR<0.8 for graft survival were age ≥60 years, Model for End-stage Liver Disease score ≥15, and male donor. When ≥2 risk factors were present, GRWR<0.8 grafts showed a higher risk of graft loss compared with GRWR≥0.8 graft in LDLT (hazard ratio 2.98, 95% CI: 1.79-4.88, P <0.001). GRWR<0.8 graft showed inferior graft survival than controls (85.2% vs 90.1%), especially when ≥2 risk factors for graft loss (among age 60 years or above, Model for End-stage Liver Disease score ≥15, or male donor) were present.

Preexisting portal vein thrombosis and adult LDLT: A retrospective cohort analysis

BackgroundPortal Vein Thrombosis (PVT) is a common concern in cirrhotic patients awaiting liver transplantation (LT), with high morbidity and mortality rates. While preexisting PVT was traditionally considered a contraindication for the LT procedure, recent advances in surgical techniques have provided new possibilities for operating on these patients. This retrospective cohort study compared the surgical outcomes of adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) patients with and without preexisting PVT. MethodsThe study analyzed data from 416 liver transplant recipients and included 270 patients without PVT and 69 patients with PVT who underwent LDLT between March 2019 and March 2023. Preoperative imaging methods and intraoperative assessments were used to diagnose PVT and classify the extent of the thrombus using the Yerdel classification. Various surgical techniques were employed to remove the thrombus and establish a portal flow to the graft. Postoperatively, patients were monitored for complications and followed up regularly. ResultsThere were no significant differences between the non-PVT and PVT groups regarding recipient age, gender, body mass index, primary disease leading to transplantation, Child-Pugh class, or Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score. The operative variables, including graft type, duration of surgery, and cold and warm ischemia times, were also similar between the groups. The surgical procedures varied based on the Yerdel classification grade of PVT, with most patients undergoing partial or complete thrombectomy. The mean hospital stays, intensive care unit (ICU) stay duration, and reexploration rates were comparable between the non-PVT and PVT groups. However, the incidence of portal vein thrombosis was significantly higher in the PVT group (p < 0.001). Other complications, such as portal vein stenosis and hepatic artery thrombosis, occurred in a small number of patients. ConclusionThis retrospective cohort analysis demonstrates the feasibility of performing LDLT in patients with preexisting PVT using various surgical techniques. While the overall surgical outcomes and postoperative complications were comparable between patients with and without PVT, the incidence of portal vein thrombosis was higher in the PVT group. Further studies are needed to explore optimal management strategies for PVT in LDLT patients and improve outcomes in this population.

Preventing Small-for-size Syndrome in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Guidelines From the ILTS-iLDLT-LTSI Consensus Conference.

Small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) is a well-recognized complication following liver transplantation (LT), with up to 20% developing this following living donor LT (LDLT). Preventing SFSS involves consideration of factors before the surgical procedure, including donor and recipient selection, and factors during the surgical procedure, including adequate outflow reconstruction, graft portal inflow modulation, and management of portosystemic shunts. International Liver Transplantation Society, International Living Donor Liver Transplantation Group, and Liver Transplant Society of India Consensus Conference was convened in January 2023 to develop recommendations for the prediction and management of SFSS in LDLT. The format of the conference was based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. International experts in this field were allocated to 4 working groups (diagnosis, prevention, anesthesia, and critical care considerations, and management of established SFSS). The working groups prepared evidence-based recommendations to answer-specific questions considering the currently available literature. The working group members, independent panel, and conference attendees served as jury to edit and confirm the final recommendations presented at the end of the conference by each working group separately. This report presents the final statements and evidence-based recommendations provided by working group 2 that can be implemented to prevent SFSS in LDLT patients.

Survival benefit of living-donor liver transplantation in patients with a model for end-stage liver disease over 30 in a region with severe organ shortage: a retrospective cohort study.

The benefits of living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in patients with a high Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score (who have high waitlist mortality) are unclear. Regional availability of deceased-donor organs must be considered when evaluating LDLT benefits. The authors aimed to compare the survival benefit of intended-LDLT to awaiting deceased-donor liver transplantation (DDLT) in patients with a MELD score greater than or equal to 30 in a region with severe organ shortage. This retrospective review included 649 patients with a MELD score greater than or equal to 30 placed on the liver transplantation waitlist. They were divided into intended-LDLT ( n =205) or waiting-DDLT ( n =444) groups based on living-donor eligibility and compared for patient survival from the time of waitlisting. Post-transplantation outcomes of transplant recipients and living donors were analyzed. Intended-LDLT patients had higher 1-year survival than waiting-DDLT patients (53.7 vs. 28.8%, P <0.001). LDLT was independently associated with lower mortality [hazard ratio (HR), 0.62; 95% CI, 0.48-0.79; P <0.001]. During follow-up, 25 patients were de-listed, 120 underwent LDLT, 170 underwent DDLT, and 334 remained on the waitlist. Among patients undergoing transplantation, the risk of post-transplantation mortality was similar for LDLT and DDLT after adjusting for pretransplantation MELD score (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 0.73-4.75; P =0.193), despite increased surgical complications after LDLT (33.1 vs. 19.4%, P =0.013). There was no mortality among living-donors, but 4.2% experienced complications of grade 3 or higher. Compared to awaiting DDLT, LDLT offers survival benefits for patients with a MELD score greater than or equal to 30, while maintaining acceptable donor outcomes. LDLT is a feasible treatment for patients with a MELD score greater than or equal to 30 in regions with severe organ shortages.

Redo hepatic artery reconstruction for thrombosis without retransplantation in 1355 adult living donor liver transplantations.

Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) after liver transplantation is associated with a marked increase in morbidity, leading to graft and patient loss. We evaluated the outcomes of adult living donor liver transplantation patients with HAT under an aggressive surgical intervention. A total of 1355 recipients underwent adult living donor liver transplantation at the Seoul National University Hospital. Surgical redo reconstruction for HAT was performed in all cases except in those with graft hepatic artery injury and late detection of HAT. Postoperative HAT developed in 33 cases (2.4%) at a median time of 3.5 days. Thirty patients (90.9%) underwent redo-arterial reconstruction. The survival rates in patients with HAT were similar to the rates in those without HAT (72.7% vs. 83.8%, p = 0.115). Although graft survival rates were lower in patients with HAT (84.8%) than in those without HAT (98.0%) ( p < 0.001), the graft survival rate was comparable (92.0% vs. 98.0%, p = 0.124) in the 25 patients with successful revascularization. Biliary complication rates were higher in patients with HAT (54.5%) than in those without HAT (32.0%) ( p = 0.008). In conclusion, the successful redo reconstruction under careful selection criteria saved the graft without retransplantation in 96.0% of the cases. Surgical revascularization should be preferentially considered for the management of HAT in adult living donor liver transplantation.

Invited Commentary: Living-Donor Liver Transplantation for Patients with Unresectable Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis: New Option for Highly Selected Patients.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons ():10.1097/XCS.0000000000000728, May 09, 2023. | DOI: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000728

Type of donor liver transplant does not affect pregnancy outcomes-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Liver transplant (LT) has become increasingly common among reproductive-aged women. The effect of the type of liver donor, either a living donor LT (LDLT) or a deceased donor LT, on pregnancy outcomes is unknown. As such, we aim to review the available literature and assess obstetric, pregnancy, or delivery outcomes in LDLT. We conducted a comprehensive literature review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Scopus databases. Random-effect meta-regression assessed the association between the percentage of women who underwent LDLT (independent variable) and the proportion of outcomes. Meta-regression results were expressed as a regression coefficient, which transforms the proportion of outcomes of interest associated with a 1% increase in the percentage of LDLT patients. A value of 0 denotes no relationship between the outcomes and LDLT. A total of 6 articles (438 patients) were included, with a total of 806 pregnancies. Eighty-eight (20.09%) patients underwent LDLT. None of the studies segregated the data based on the type of donor LT. The median time from LT to pregnancy was 4.86 (4.62-5.03) years. Twelve (1.5%) stillbirths were reported. LDLT was statistically significantly associated with a higher rate of stillbirths (coefficient 0.002, p < 0.001; I 2 0%). The type of donor LT was not associated with an increased risk of other obstetric, pregnancy, or delivery complications. This is the first meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of the type of donor LT on pregnancy outcomes. This study highlights the lack of robust literature addressing this important topic. The results suggest that pregnancy outcomes after LDLT and deceased donor LT are comparable. Despite LDLT being statistically significantly associated with a higher rate of stillbirths, the association is weak and is unlikely to be clinically significant.

Complications and Long-Term Outcomes in Adult Patients Undergoing Living Donor Liver Transplantation Because of Fulminant Hepatitis

BackgroundThe present study investigates the complications that may occur during long-term follow-up in patients aged 18 years and older undergoing living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in our clinic because of fulminant hepatitis. MethodsThe study included patients aged 18 years and older with a minimum survival of 6 months who underwent an LDLT between June 2000 and June 2017. The demographic data of the patients were evaluated in terms of late-term complications. ResultsOf the 240 patients who met the study criteria, 8 (3.3%) underwent LDLT for fulminant hepatitis. The indication for transplantation in patients with fulminant hepatitis was cryptogenic liver hepatitis in 4 patients, acute hepatitis B infection in 2 patients, hemochromatosis in 1 patient, and toxic hepatitis in 1 patient. Of the 240 patients, 65 (27%) undergoing LDLT underwent a liver biopsy for suspected rejection because of an elevation in liver function test results during follow-up. Histopathologic scoring was carried out according to the Banff scoring system. A diagnosis of late acute rejection was made in only 1 of the 8 patients (12.5%) who underwent LDLT for fulminant hepatitis. ConclusionPatients with fulminant hepatitis must be prepared for an LDLT, if available, while waiting for a cadaveric donor. The results of the present study suggest that LDLTs in patients with fulminant hepatitis are safe, and the outcomes are acceptable in terms of survival and complications.

Analysis of Short-Term and Long-Term Outcomes of Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Patients with a High Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Score

The Model of End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scoring system can predict short-term survival among patients awaiting liver transplantation and is used to allocate organs prioritizing liver transplantation. Patients with high MELD scores have been reported to have worse early graft dysfunction and survival. However, recent studies have shown that patients with high MELD scores had satisfactory graft survival, although they showed more postoperative complications. In this study, we examined the effect of the MELD score on the short-term and long-term prognosis of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). This study included 102 patients who underwent LDLT in our institution between 2005 and 2020. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to MELD score (low MELD group: ≤20, moderate MELD group: 21-30, and high MELD group: ≥31). Perioperative factors were compared among the 3 groups, and cumulative overall survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The patients' characteristics were comparable, and the median age was 54 years. Hepatitis C virus cirrhosis was the most common primary disease (n=40), followed by hepatitis B virus (n=11). The low MELD group consisted of 68 patients (median score: 16, 10-20); the moderate MELD group, 24 patients (median score: 24, 21-30); and the high MELD group, 10 patients (median score: 35, 31-40). The mean operative time (1241 min versus 1278 min versus 1158 min, P=.19) and mean blood loss (7517 mL vs 11162 mL vs 8808 mL, P=.71) were not significantly different among the 3 groups. The vascular and biliary complication rates were similar. The periods of intensive care unit and hospital stay tended to be longer in the high MELD group, but the difference was insignificant. The 1-year postoperative survival rate (85.3 % vs 87.5 % vs 90.0 %, P=.90) and overall survival rate were also not significantly different among the 3 groups. Our study showed that LDLT patients with high MELD scores do not have a worse prognosis than those with low scores.

Long-term renal outcomes comparison between patients with chronic kidney disease and hepatorenal syndrome after living donor liver transplantation.

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a disastrous renal complication of advanced liver disease with a poor prognosis. Restoring normal liver function through liver transplantation (LT) is a standardized treatment with favorable short-term survival. However, the long-term renal outcomes in patients with HRS receiving living donor LT (LDLT) are controversial. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic impact of LDLT in patients with HRS. We reviewed adult patients who underwent LDLT between July 2008 and September 2017. Recipients were classified into 1) HRS type 1 (HRS1, N = 11), 2) HRS type 2 (HRS2, N = 19), 3) non-HRS recipients with pre-existing chronic kidney disease (CKD, N = 43), and 4) matched normal renal function (N = 67). Postoperative complications and 30-day surgical mortality were comparable among the HRS1, HRS2, CKD, and normal renal function groups. The 5-year survival rate was >90% and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) transiently improved and peaked at 4 weeks post-transplantation in patients with HRS. However, renal function deteriorated and resulted in CKD stage ≥ III in 72.7% of HRS1 and 78.9% of HRS2 patients (eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2). The incidence of developing CKD and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) was similar between the HRS1, HRS2, and CKD groups, but significantly higher than that in the normal renal function group (both P < 0.001). In multivariate logistic regression, pre-LDLT eGFR <46.4 ml/min/1.73 m2 predicted the development of post-LDLT CKD stage ≥ III in patients with HRS (AUC = 0.807, 95% CI = 0.617-0.997, P = 0.011). LDLT provides a significant survival benefit for patients with HRS. However, the risk of CKD stage ≥ III and ESRD among patients with HRS was similar to that in pre-transplant CKD recipients. An early preventative renal-sparing strategy in patients with HRS is recommended.

Risk Factors for Cytomegalovirus Infection and Its Impact on Survival after Living Donor Liver Transplantation in South Korea: A Nested Case-Control Study.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV), a common pathogen, causes infectious complications and affects long-term survival after transplantation. Studies examining living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) are limited. This study analyzed the risk factors for CMV infection and its impact on the survival of LDLT patients. A nested case-control design retrospectively analyzed data from 952 patients who underwent LDLT from 2005-2021. The incidence of CMV infection for the study cohort was 15.2% at 3 months for LDLT patients managed preemptively. Patients with CMV infections were matched with those without the infection at corresponding time points (index postoperative day) in a 1:2 ratio. Graft survival was significantly lower in the CMV infection group than in the control group. CMV infection was an independent risk factor for graft survival in the matched cohort (HR 1.93, p = 0.012). Independent risk factors for CMV infection were female sex (HR 2.4, p = 0.003), pretransplant MELD (HR 1.06, p = 0.004), pretransplant in-hospital stay (HR 1.83, p = 0.030), ABO incompatibility (HR 2.10, p = 0.009), donor macrovesicular steatosis ≥10% (HR 2.01, p = 0.030), and re-operation before index POD (HR 2.51, p = 0.035). CMV infection is an independent survival risk factor, and its risk factors should be included in the surveillance and treatment of CMV infections after LDLT.

Outcomes of the Initial Phase of an Adult Living vs Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation Program in a Low-Volume Transplant Center: Integration of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery

The development of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is clinically challenging, especially in a low-volume transplant program. We evaluated the short-term outcomes of LDLT and deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) to demonstrate the feasibility of performing LDLT in a low-volume transplant and/or high-volume complex hepatobiliary surgery program during the initial phase. We conducted a retrospective study of LDLT and DDLT in Chiang Mai University Hospital from October 2014 to April 2020. Postoperative complications and 1-year survival were compared between the 2 groups. Forty patients who underwent LT in our hospital were analyzed. There were 20 LDLT patients and 20 DDLT patients. The operative time and hospital stay were significantly longer in the LDLT group than in the DDLT group. The incidence of complications in both groups was comparable, except for biliary complications, which were higher in the LDLT group. Bile leakage, found in 3 patients (15%), is the most common complication in a donor. The 1-year survival rates of both groups were also comparable. Even during the initial phase of the low-volume transplant program, LDLT and DDLT had comparable perioperative outcomes. Surgical expertise in complex hepatobiliary surgery is necessary to facilitate effective LDLT, potentially increasing case volumes and promoting program sustainability.

Innovative formulae for the estimation of standard liver volume in the era of widespread imaging analysis software.

Various formulae have been used for the estimation of standard liver volume (SLV) in preparation for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). However, these formulae have the disadvantage of being constructed using parameters that are substantially affected by the patient's condition. Here, we aimed to establish more precise formulae that are less affected by the general condition of the patient. We analyzed the liver volumes of LDLT donors and patients with normal livers (total: n=213) using the SYNAPSE VINCENT imaging analysis system, to develop new formulae. The accuracy of the new formulae were compared with those of existing formulae in a separate validation group of healthy patients (n=200). The new formulae were also validated using 81 LDLT recipients to assess their utility for graft selection in LDLT. Body surface area (BSA) and skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) independently affected total liver volume (TLV). We produced new formulae for SLV incorporating SMI: SLV = 32.2×L3-SMI-466.9 for men, with R2 .92, and 25.7×L3-SMI-55.97 for women, with R2 .79 (alongside a BSA formula with R2 .57), which provided the most accurate predictions of TLV in the validation group. A graft volume (GV)/SLV <.35, calculated using the new formulae, predicted the postoperative prognosis, including the development of small-for-size syndrome, sepsis, or acute rejection, significantly more effectively than GV/SLV using the previous formulae. The newly developed L3-SMI-based formula is more accurate for the estimation of SLV than previously reported formulae, and may thus help to improve the safety of LDLT.

Response to Comment on "Living Donor Liver Transplantation With Augmented Venous Outflow and Splenectomy: A Promised Land for Small Left Lobe Grafts".

Response to Comment on "Living Donor Liver Transplantation With Augmented Venous Outflow and Splenectomy: A Promised Land for Small Left Lobe Grafts".