Outcome Of Liver Transplantation Research Articles

Organ donation and organ assessment after primary circulatory death and secondary brain death

The global organ shortage is the biggest obstacle to expand urgently needed liver transplantation activities. In addition to donation after brain death (DBD), donation after primary circulatory death (DCD) has also been introduced in many European countries to increase the number of donated organs. This article summarizes the legal and ethical aspects of DCD, the practical donation process of DCD, the clinical results of DCD liver transplantation with aspecial focus on organ assessment before a planned DCD liver transplantation. In Europe 11countries have active DCD liver transplantation programs and atotal of 1230 DCD liver transplantations were performed in Europe in 2023. The highest proportion of DCD liver transplantations were recorded in Belgium (52.8%), the Netherlands (42.8%) and Switzerland (32.1%). The adequate selection of donors and recipients is crucial in DCD transplantation and the use of DCD livers particularly depends on the preparedness of the healthcare system for routine machine perfusion. The leaders are Belgium, France and Italy which implant around 68-74% of DCD organs. With an adequate organ assessment, the long-term results of DBD and DCD liver transplantations are comparable. To assess mitochondrial damage and thus organ quality, hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) was introduced and has the secondary benefit of mitochondrial protection through oxygenation. The establishment of aerobic metabolism in mitochondria under hypothermia leads to areduction of toxic metabolites and the restoration of ATP storage, which subsequently leads to areperfusion light during implantation. Expanding the donor pool with DCD donors can counteract the global organ shortage. With adequate patient selection and routine organ assessment short-term and also long-term outcomes of DBD and DCD liver transplantation are comparable.

Transcriptional Profiling Underscores the Role of Preprocurement Allograft Metabolism and Innate Immune Status on Outcomes in Human Liver Transplantation

Objective: The adverse effects of ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) remain a principal barrier to a successful outcome after lifesaving orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Gene expression during different phases of IRI is dynamic and modified by individual exposures, making it attractive for identifying potential therapeutic targets for improving the number of suitable organs for transplantation and patient outcomes. However, data remain limited on the functional landscape of gene expression during liver graft IRI, spanning procurement to reperfusion and recovery. Therefore, we sought to characterize transcriptomic profiles of IRI during multiple phases in human OLT. Methods: We conducted clinical data analyses, histologic evaluation, and RNA sequencing of 17 consecutive human primary OLT. We performed liver allograft biopsies at 4 time points: baseline (B, before donor cross-clamp), at the end of cold ischemia (CI), during early reperfusion (ER, after revascularization), and during late reperfusion (LR). Data were generated and then recipients grouped by post-OLT outcomes categories: immediate allograft function (IAF; n = 11) versus early allograft dysfunction (EAD; n = 6) groups. Results: We observed that CI (vs B) modified a transcriptomic landscape enriched for a metabolic and immune process. Expression levels of hallmark inflammatory response genes were higher transitioning from CI to ER and decreased from ER to LR. IAF group predominantly showed higher bile and fatty acid metabolism activity during LR compared with EAD group, while EAD group maintained more immunomodulatory activities. Throughout all time points, EAD specimens exhibited decreased metabolic activity in both bile and fatty acid pathways. Conclusions: We report transcriptomic profiles of human liver allograft IRI from prepreservation in the donor to posttransplantation in the recipient. Immunomodulatory and metabolic landscapes across ER and LR phases were different between IAF and EAD allografts. Our study also highlights marker genes for these biological processes that we plan to explore as novel therapeutic targets or surrogate markers for severe allograft injury in clinical OLT.

Liver Transplantation from Elderly Donors (≥85 Years Old)

Background: Despite the ongoing trend of increasing donor ages in liver transplantation (LT) setting, a notable gap persists in the availability of comprehensive guidelines for the utilization of organs from elderly donors. This study aimed to evaluate the viability of livers grafts from donors aged ≥85 years and report the post-LT outcomes compared with those from “ideal” donors under 40 years old. Methods: Conducted retrospectively at a single center from 2005 to 2023, this study compared outcomes of LTs from donors aged ≥85 y/o and ≤40 y/o, with the propensity score matching to the recipient’s gender, age, BMI, MELD score, redo-LT, LT indication, and cause of donor death. Results: A total of 76 patients received grafts from donors ≥85 y/o and were compared to 349 liver grafts from donors ≤40 y/o. Prior to PSM, the 5-year overall survival was 63% for the elderly group and 77% for the young group (p = 0.002). After PSM, the 5-year overall survival was 63% and 73% (p = 0.1). A nomogram, developed at the time of graft acceptance and including HCC features, predicted 10-year survival after LT using a graft from a donor aged ≥85. Conclusions: In the context of organ scarcity, elderly donors emerge as a partial solution. Nonetheless, without proper selection, LT using very elderly donors yields inferior long-term outcomes compared to transplantation from very young donors ≤40 y/o. The resulting nomogram based on pre-transplant criteria allows for the optimization of elderly donor/recipient matching to achieve satisfactory long-term results, in addition to traditional matching methods.

Changes in thoracic radio density after living donor liver transplantation.

The outcomes after liver transplantation have greatly improved, which has resulted in greater focus on improving non-hepatic outcomes of liver transplantation. The present study aimed to evaluate thoracic spine radio density in children and adolescents after liver transplantation. A total of 116 patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation were retrospectively analyzed. The radio density at the eleventh thoracic vertebra was measured using computed tomography scan performed preoperatively then annually for 5 years postoperatively and subsequently every 2 or 3 years. The mean thoracic radio density of male recipients of male grafts had the lowest values during the study. The radio density of patients receiving a graft from a female donor was higher than in recipients with grafts from males. Total mean radio density decreased for first 5 years postoperatively and then increased. Changes in radio density were equally distributed in both steroid withdrawal and no steroid withdrawal groups for 5 years, after which patients with steroid withdrawal had a greater increase. Changes in radio density were equally distributed in both the steroid withdrawal and no steroid withdrawal groups up to age 20, after which patients in the steroid withdrawal group had a greater increase. Gender differences may affect the outcome of radio density changes after transplantation. Given the moderate association between thoracic radio density and bone mineral density in skeletally mature adults and further studies are needed to validate this relationship between thoracic radio density and bone mineral density changes in pediatric liver transplantation.

Deoxyguanosine kinase deficiency: natural history and liver transplant outcome.

Autosomal recessive pathogenetic variants in the DGUOK gene cause deficiency of deoxyguanosine kinase activity and mitochondrial deoxynucleotides pool imbalance, consequently, leading to quantitative and/or qualitative impairment of mitochondrial DNA synthesis. Typically, patients present early-onset liver failure with or without neurological involvement and a clinical course rapidly progressing to death. This is an international multicentre study aiming to provide a retrospective natural history of deoxyguanosine kinase deficient patients. A systematic literature review from January 2001 to June 2023 was conducted. Physicians of research centres or clinicians all around the world caring for previously reported patients were contacted to provide followup information or additional clinical, biochemical, histological/histochemical, and molecular genetics data for unreported cases with a confirmed molecular diagnosis of deoxyguanosine kinase deficiency. A cohort of 202 genetically confirmed patients, 36 unreported, and 166 from a systematic literature review, were analyzed. Patients had a neonatal onset (≤ 1 month) in 55.7% of cases, infantile (>1 month and ≤ 1 year) in 32.3%, pediatric (>1 year and ≤18 years) in 2.5% and adult (>18 years) in 9.5%. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed statistically different survival rates (P < 0.0001) among the four age groups with the highest mortality for neonatal onset. Based on the clinical phenotype, we defined four different clinical subtypes: hepatocerebral (58.8%), isolated hepatopathy (21.9%), hepatomyoencephalopathy (9.6%), and isolated myopathy (9.6%). Muscle involvement was predominant in adult-onset cases whereas liver dysfunction causes morbidity and mortality in early-onset patients with a median survival of less than 1 year. No genotype-phenotype correlation was identified. Liver transplant significantly modified the survival rate in 26 treated patients when compared with untreated. Only six patients had additional mild neurological signs after liver transplant. In conclusion, deoxyguanosine kinase deficiency is a disease spectrum with a prevalent liver and brain tissue specificity in neonatal and infantile-onset patients and muscle tissue specificity in adult-onset cases. Our study provides clinical, molecular genetics and biochemical data for early diagnosis, clinical trial planning and immediate intervention with liver transplant and/or nucleoside supplementation.

Epidemiology and Management of Infections in Liver Transplant Recipients.

Background: Improvements in liver transplant (LT) outcomes are attributed to advances in surgical techniques, use of potent immunosuppressants, and rigorous pre-LT testing. Despite these improvements, post-LT infections remain the most common complication in this population. Bacteria constitute the most common infectious agents, while fungal and viral infections are also frequently encountered. Multi-drug-resistant bacterial infections develop because of polymicrobial overuse and prolonged hospital stays. Immediate post-LT infections are commonly caused by viruses. Conclusions: Appropriate vaccination, screening of both donor and recipients before LT and antiviral prophylaxis in high-risk individuals are recommended. Antimicrobial drug resistance is common in high-risk LT and associated with poor outcomes; epidemiology and management of these cases is discussed. Additionally, we also discuss the effect of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and monkeypox in the LT population.

Small graft size and hepatocellular carcinoma outcomes in living donor liver transplantation: a retrospective multicentric cohort study.

This study examined associations between the graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) for adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and HCC outcomes. Data from patients in the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry who underwent LDLT for HCC from 2014-2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized using the cutoff GRWR for HCC recurrence determined by an adjusted cubic spline (GRWR<0.7% vs. GRWR≥0.7%). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and HCC recurrence were analyzed in the entire and a 1:5 propensity-matched cohort. The eligible cohort consisted of 2005 LDLT recipients (GRWR<0.7 [n=59] vs. GRWR≥0.7 [n=1946]). In the entire cohort, 5-year RFS was significantly lower in the GRWR<0.7 than in the GRWR≥0.7 group (66.7% vs. 76.7%, P =0.019), although HCC recurrence was not different between groups (77.1% vs. 80.7%, P =0.234). This trend was similar in the matched cohort ( P =0.014 for RFS and P =0.096 for HCC recurrence). In multivariable analyses, GRWR<0.7 was an independent risk factor for RFS (adjusted HR [aHR] 1.89, P =0.012), but the result was marginal for HCC recurrence (aHR 1.61, P =0.066). In the pretransplant tumor burden subgroup analysis, GRWR<0.7 was a significant risk factor for both RFS and HCC recurrence only for tumors exceeding the Milan criteria (aHR 3.10, P <0.001 for RFS; aHR 2.92, P =0.003 for HCC recurrence) or with MoRAL scores in the fourth quartile (aHR 3.33, P <0.001 for RFS; aHR 2.61, P =0.019 for HCC recurrence). A GRWR<0.7 potentially leads to lower RFS and higher HCC recurrence after LDLT when the pretransplant tumor burden is high.

Optimizing pediatric liver transplantation: Evaluating the impact of donor age and graft type on patient survival outcome.

We examined the combined effects of donor age and graft type on pediatric liver transplantation outcomes with an aim to offer insights into the strategic utilization of these donor and graft options. A retrospective analysis was conducted using a national database on 0-2-year-old (N = 2714) and 3-17-year-old (N = 2263) pediatric recipients. These recipients were categorized based on donor age (≥40 vs <40 years) and graft type. Survival outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models, followed by an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis to examine overall patient survival. Living and younger donors generally resulted in better outcomes compared to deceased and older donors, respectively. This difference was more significant among younger recipients (0-2 years compared to 3-17 years). Despite this finding, ITT survival analysis showed that donor age and graft type did not impact survival with the exception of 0-2-year-old recipients who had an improved survival with a younger living donor graft. Timely transplantation has the largest impact on survival in pediatric recipients. Improving waitlist mortality requires uniform surgical expertise at many transplant centers to provide technical variant graft (TVG) options and shed the conservative mindset of seeking only the "best" graft for pediatric recipients.

The influence of neighborhood income on healthcare utilization in pediatric liver transplant.

Neighborhood contextual factors are associated with liver transplant outcomes. We analyzed associations between neighborhood-level socioeconomic status and healthcare utilization for pediatric liver transplant recipients. We merged the Pediatric Health Information System and Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients databases and included liver transplant recipients ≤21 years hospitalized between January 2004 and May 2022. Outcomes were annual inpatient bed-days, risk of hospitalizations, and risk of liver biopsies. The primary exposure was zip code-based neighborhood income at transplant. We applied causal inference for variable selection in multivariable analysis. We modeled annual inpatient bed-days with mixed-effect zero-inflated Poisson regression, and rates of hospitalization and liver biopsy with a Cox-type proportional rate model. We included 1006 participants from 29 institutions. Children from low-income neighborhoods were more likely to be publicly insured (67% vs. 46%), Black (20% vs. 12%), Hispanic (30% vs. 17%), and have higher model for end-stage liver disease/pediatric end-stage liver disease model scores at transplant (17 vs. 13) than the remaining cohort. We found no differences in inpatient bed-days or rates of hospitalization across neighborhood groups. In univariable analysis, low-income neighborhoods were associated with increased rates of liver biopsy (RR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.04-2.34, p = 0.03). These findings persisted after adjusting for insurance, race, and ethnicity (RR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.23-2.83, p < 0.01). Children from low-income neighborhoods undergo more liver biopsies than other children. These procedures are invasive and potentially preventable. In addition to improving outcomes, interventions to mitigate health inequities among liver transplant recipients may reduce resource utilization.

Asystolic donor warm ischemia time is associated with development of postreperfusion syndrome in donation after circulatory death liver transplant.

Individual events during donation after circulatory death (DCD) procurement, such as hypotensive or hypoxic warm ischemia, or circulatory arrest are all a part of donor warm ischemia time (dWIT), and may have differing effects on the outcome of the liver graft. This study aimed to identify risk factors for postreperfusion syndrome (PRS), a state of severe hemodynamic derangement following graft reperfusion, and its impact on DCD liver transplantation (LT) outcomes. This was a retrospective analysis using 106 DCD LT. Detailed information for events during procurement (withdrawal of life support; systolic blood pressure<80mmHg; oxygen saturation<80%; circulatory arrest; aortic cold perfusion) and their association with the development of PRS were examined using logistic regression. The overall incidence of PRS was 26.4%, occurring in 28 patients. Independent risk factors for PRS were asystolic dWIT (odds ratio (OR) 3.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.38-9.66) and MELD score (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.10). Total bilirubin was significantly higher in the PRS group at postoperative day (POD) 1 (p=.02; 5.2mg/dL vs. 3.4mg/dL), POD 3 (p=.049; 4.5mg/dL vs. 2.8mg/dL), and POD 7 (p=.04; 3.1mg/dL vs. 1.9mg/dL). Renal replacement therapy after LT was more likely to be required in the PRS group (p=.01; 48.2%vs. 23.1%). Asystolic dWIT is a risk factor for the development of PRS in DCD LT. Our results suggest that asystolic dWIT should be considered when selecting DCD liver donors.

Transplantace jater pro cholestatická onemocnění

Summary: Cholestatic liver diseases are characterized by their progressive nature and limited conservative treatment options. Liver transplantation is the only effective method of treatment for the terminal stage. Before the era of liver transplantation, patients with cholestatic disease had a significantly reduced life expectancy. Liver transplantation is now indicated not only for patients with chronic liver failure or hepatobiliary malignancy, but also for those with reduced quality of life from cholestatic symptoms. Post-transplant care is particularly specific because of the presence of immune-associated diseases, such as inflammatory bowel disease in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Recurrence of the underlying disease in the liver graft is a common long-term complication that can negatively affect graft survival and overall life expectancy. Despite the risk of recurrence, the long-term outcomes of liver transplantation for cholestatic disease are excellent, achieving longer survival compared to other transplant recipients. Key words: liver transplantation – primary sclerosing cholangitis – primary biliary cholangitis – secondary sclerosing cholangitis – liver sarcoidosis

Incidence, epidemiology and outcomes of acute allograft rejection following liver transplantation in Australia.

Acute allograft rejection is a well-known complication of liver transplantation (LT). The incidence, epidemiology and outcomes of acute rejection have not been well-described in Australia. We retrospectively studied consecutive adults who underwent deceased-donor LT at a single centre between 2010-2020. Donor and recipient data at time of LT and recipient outcomes were collected from a prospective LT database. Liver biopsy reports were reviewed and only a graft's first instance of biopsy-proven acute rejection was analysed. During the study period, 796 liver transplants were performed in 770 patients. Biopsy-proven rejection occurred in 34.9% of transplants. There were no significant changes in the incidence of rejection over time (linear trend p=0.11). The median time to first episode of rejection was 71 days post-LT: 2.2% hyperacute, 50.4% early (≤90d) and 47.5% late rejection (>90d). Independent risk factors for rejection were younger recipient age at transplant (aHR 0.98 per year increase, 95% CI 0.97-1.00, p=0.01), and ABO-incompatible grafts (aHR 2.55 vs. ABO-compatible, 95% CI 1.27-5.09, p<0.01) while simultaneous multiorgan transplants were protective (aHR 0.21 vs. LT only, 95% CI 0.08-0.58, p<0.01). Development of acute rejection (both early and late) was independently associated with significantly reduced graft (aHR 3.13, 95% CI 2.21-4.42, p<0.001) and patient survival (aHR 3.42, 95% CI 2.35-4.98, p<0.001). In this 11-year Australian study, acute LT rejection occurred in 35%, with independent risk factors of younger recipient age and ABO-incompatible transplant while having a simultaneous multiorgan transplant was protective. Acute rejection was independently associated with reduced graft and patient survival after adjustment for other factors.

Enhancing the Usability of older DCD donors through strategic approaches in liver transplantation in the US.

The use of older donors after circulatory death(DCD) for liver transplantation(LT) has increased over the past decade. This study examined whether outcomes of LT using older DCD(≥50y) have improved with advancements in surgical/perioperative care and normothermic machine perfusion(NMP) technology. 7,602 DCD LT cases from the UNOS database(2003-2022) were reviewed. The impact of older DCD donors on graft survival(GS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and hazard ratio(HR) analyses. 1,447 LT cases(19.0%) involved older DCD donors. Although there was a decrease in their use from 2003-2014, a resurgence was noted post-2015 and reached 21.9% of all LT in the last four years(2019-2022). Initially, 90-day and one-year GS for older DCDs were worse than younger DCDs, but this difference decreased over time and there was no statistical difference after 2015. Similarly, HRs for graft loss in older DCD have recently become insignificant. In older DCD LT, NMP usage has increased recently, especially in cases with extended donor-recipient distances, while the median time from asystole to aortic cross-clamp has decreased. Multivariable Cox regression analyses revealed that in the early phase, asystole to cross-clamp time had the highest HR for graft loss in older DCD LT without NMP, while in the later phases, the CIT(>5.5h) was a significant predictor. LT outcomes using older DCD donors have become comparable to those from young DCD donors, with recent HRs for graft loss becoming insignificant. The strategic approach in the recent period could mitigate risks, including managing CIT(≤5.5h), reducing asystole to cross-clamp time, and adopting NMP for longer distances. Optimal use of older DCD donors may alleviate the donor shortage.

Clinical outcomes of liver transplantation in human immunodeficiency virus/hepatitis B virus coinfected patients in China

BackgroundHighly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has been able to improve the immune system function and survival of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) patients. However, Patients coinfected with HIV and hepatitis B virus (HBV) are more likely to develop end-stage liver disease (ESLD) than those infected with HBV alone. Consequently, liver transplantation is often required for these patients. This study evaluates the outcomes of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) of HIV-HBV coinfected patients in China.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis on all HIV-HBV coinfected patients that underwent OLT from April 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021 and their outcomes were compared to all HBV monoinfected patients undergoing OLT during the same period. Patient outcomes were determined, including cumulative survival, viral load, CD4 T-cell count and postoperative complications.ResultsThe median follow-up of HIV recipients was 36 months after OLT (interquartile range 12–39 months). Almost all patients had stable CD4 T-cell count (> 200 copies/ul), undetectable HBV DNA levels, and undetectable HIV RNA load during follow-up. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year posttransplant survival rates were 85.7% for the HIV group (unchanged from 1 to 3 years) versus 82.2%, 81.2%, and 78.8% for the non-HIV group. Cumulative survival among HIV-HBV coinfected recipients was not significantly different from the HBV monoinfected recipients (log-rank test P = 0.692). The percentage of deaths attributed to infection was comparable between the HIV and non-HIV groups (14.3% vs. 9.32%, P = 0.665). Post OLT, there was no significant difference in acute rejection, cytomegalovirus infection, bacteremia, pulmonary infection, acute kidney injury, de novo tumor and vascular and biliary complications.ConclusionsLiver transplantation in patients with HIV-HBV coinfection yields excellent outcomes in terms of intermediate- or long-term survival rate and low incidence of postoperative complications in China. These findings suggest that OLT is safe and feasible for HIV-HBV coinfected patients with ESLD.Trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300067631), registered 11 January 2023.

Cell-specific Extracellular Vesicles and Their miRNA Cargo Released Into the Organ Preservation Solution During Cold Ischemia Storage as Biomarkers for Liver Transplant Outcomes.

Liver transplantation (LT) is crucial for end-stage liver disease patients, but organ shortages persist. Donation after circulatory death (DCD) aims to broaden the donor pool but presents challenges. Complications like acute rejection, hepatic artery thrombosis, and biliary issues still impact posttransplant prognosis. Biomarkers, including extracellular vesicles (EVs) and microRNAs (miRNAs), show promise in understanding and monitoring posttransplant events. This study explores the role of EVs and their miRNA cargo in LT, including their potential as diagnostic tools. EVs from intrahepatic end-ischemic organ preservation solution (eiOPS) in 79 donated livers were detected using different techniques (nanosight tracking analysis, transmission electron microscopy, and flow cytometry). EV-derived miRNAs were identified by quantitative real time-polymerase chain reaction. Bioinformatics analysis was performed using the R platform. Different-sized and origin-specific EVs were found in eiOPS, with significantly higher concentrations in DCD compared with donation after brain death organs. Additionally, several EV-associated miRNAs, including let-7d-5p, miR-28-5p, miR-200a-3p, miR-200b-3p, miR-200c-3p, and miR-429, were overexpressed in DCD-derived eiOPS. These miRNAs also exhibited differential expression patterns in liver tissue biopsies. Pathway analysis revealed enrichment in signaling pathways involved in extracellular matrix organization and various cellular processes. Moreover, specific EVs and miRNAs correlated with clinical outcomes, including survival and early allograft dysfunction. A predictive model combining biomarkers and clinical variables showed promise in acute rejection detection after LT. These findings provide new insights into the use of EVs and miRNAs as biomarkers and their possible influence on posttransplantation outcomes, potentially contributing to improved diagnostic approaches and personalized treatment strategies in LT.

Indications and outcomes of liver transplantation for liver tumors in the United States

BackgroundWhile hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains the leading cause of liver transplant (LT) for liver tumors, indications have broadened over the years. Data regarding patient characteristics and outcomes of LT for liver tumors are limited. MethodsFrom Jan-2002 to March-2022, 14,406 LT recipients for various liver tumors were identified in United Network for Organ Sharing database. Overall post-transplant survival analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox proportional-hazards model. ResultsDuring the study period, indications for LT for various hepatic tumors were HCC (88.5 %), benign tumors (5.1 %), cholangiocarcinoma (3.9 %), angiosarcoma (0.7 %), bile duct cancer (0.7 %), secondary tumors (0.5 %) and others (0.7 %). Compared to non-HCC, LT recipients for HCC were older (median age 61 vs 54 years, P < 0.001), more often male (77% vs 48 %, P < 0.001), more often Hispanic (16% vs 8.0 %), had higher BMI (28.2 vs 25.3, P < 0.001) and higher prevalence of Hepatitis C (53% vs 3.9 %, P < 0.001). Donor characteristics across various groups were similar. One-year survival in LT recipients of HCC was higher (HCC: 91.7% vs. non-HCC: 90.3 %) with adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR) of 0.87; 95 % CI 0.77–0.99, P = 0.033 in a multivariable Cox regression analysis. Compared to HCC, survival outcomes were worse in cholangiocarcinoma (aHR 1.70; 95 %CI 1.43–2.01, P < 0.001), bile duct cancer (aHR 3.03; 95 %CI 2.12–4.33, P < 0.001), secondary tumors including colon cancer and neuroendocrine tumors (aHR 1.88; 95 % CI 1.24–2.85, P = 0.003), with best survival in patients with benign tumors (aHR 0.57; 95 %CI 0.46–0.70, P < 0.001). ConclusionsLT is performed for various liver tumors with variable outcomes among these primary indications.

US Liver Transplant Outcomes After Normothermic Regional Perfusion vs Standard Super Rapid Recovery

Normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) is an emerging recovery modality for transplantable allografts from controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) donors. In the US, only 11.4% of liver recipients who are transplanted from a deceased donor receive a cDCD liver. NRP has the potential to safely expand the US donor pool with improved transplant outcomes as compared with standard super rapid recovery (SRR). To assess outcomes of US liver transplants using controlled donation after circulatory death livers recovered with normothermic regional perfusion vs standard super rapid recovery. This was a retrospective, observational cohort study comparing liver transplant outcomes from cDCD donors recovered by NRP vs SRR. Outcomes of cDCD liver transplant from January 2017 to May 2023 were collated from 17 US transplant centers and included livers recovered by SRR and NRP (thoracoabdominal NRP [TA-NRP] and abdominal NRP [A-NRP]). Seven transplant centers used NRP, allowing for liver allografts to be transplanted at 17 centers; 10 centers imported livers recovered via NRP from other centers. cDCD livers were recovered by either NRP or SRR. The primary outcome was ischemic cholangiopathy (IC). Secondary end points included primary nonfunction (PNF), early allograft dysfunction (EAD), biliary anastomotic strictures, posttransplant length of stay (LOS), and patient and graft survival. A total of 242 cDCD livers were included in this study: 136 recovered by SRR and 106 recovered by NRP (TA-NRP, 79 and A-NRP, 27). Median (IQR) NRP and SRR donor age was 30.5 (22-44) years and 36 (27-49) years, respectively. Median (IQR) posttransplant LOS was significantly shorter in the NRP cohort (7 [5-11] days vs 10 [7-16] days; P < .001). PNF occurred only in the SRR allografts group (n = 2). EAD was more common in the SRR cohort (123 of 136 [56.1%] vs 77 of 106 [36.4%]; P = .007). Biliary anastomotic strictures were increased 2.8-fold in SRR recipients (7 of 105 [6.7%] vs 30 of 134 [22.4%]; P = .001). Only SRR recipients had IC (0 vs 12 of 133 [9.0%]; P = .002); IC-free survival by Kaplan-Meier was significantly improved in NRP recipients. Patient and graft survival were comparable between cohorts. There was comparable patient and graft survival in liver transplant recipients of cDCD donors recovered by NRP vs SRR, with reduced rates of IC, biliary complications, and EAD in NRP recipients. The feasibility of A-NRP and TA-NRP implementation across multiple US transplant centers supports increasing adoption of NRP to improve organ use, access to transplant, and risk of wait-list mortality.

Impact of preoperative infection on the outcomes of liver transplant recipients: a national propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study in China.

Impact of preoperative infection on liver transplantation (LT) needs further investigation. From January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2022, 24,122 eligible patients receiving LT were enrolled from the China Liver Transplant Registry database. The outcomes of LT were compared after using the propensity score-matched analysis. Compared to the non-infection group, patients in the infection group were more likely to have postoperative effusion, infection, abdominal bleeding and biliary complications (all P<0.01), and they had shorter 30-day, 90-day survival and overall survival (OS) (all P<0.01). Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed that MELD score and cold ischemia time were risk factors for the OS in the infection group (both P<0.05). Besides, compared to the non-pulmonary group, patients in the pulmonary group were more likely to have postoperative effusion and infection (both P<0.0001), and less likely to have postoperative abscess and early allograft dysfunction (both P<0.05). Patients in the non-abdominal group also had a higher proportion of postoperative infection than those in the abdominal group (P<0.05). Furthermore, compared to the number=1 group, patients in the number≥2 group were more prone to postoperative effusion and infection (both P<0.01), and they also had shorter 30-day and 90-day survival (both P<0.05). Preoperative infection can result in a higher incidence of early postoperative complications and shorter survival in liver transplant recipients. The types and number of infection sites will also influence the prognosis of liver transplant recipients.

Recipient hepatectomy technique may affect oncological outcomes of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.

To date, caval sparing (CS) and total caval replacement (TCR) for recipient hepatectomy in liver transplantation (LT) have been compared only in terms of surgical morbidity. Nonetheless, the CS technique is inherently associated with an increased manipulation of the native liver and later exclusion of the venous outflow, which may increase the risk of intraoperative shedding of tumor cells when LT is performed for HCC. A multicenter, retrospective study was performed to assess the impact of recipient hepatectomy (CS vs. TCR) on the risk of posttransplant HCC recurrence among 16 European transplant centers that used either TCR or CS recipient hepatectomy as an elective protocol technique. Exclusion criteria comprised cases of non-center-protocol recipient hepatectomy technique, living-donor LT, HCC diagnosis suspected on preoperative imaging but not confirmed at the pathological examination of the explanted liver, HCC in close contact with the IVC, and previous liver resection for HCC. In 2420 patients, CS and TCR approaches were used in 1452 (60%) and 968 (40%) cases, respectively. Group adjustment with inverse probability weighting was performed for high-volume center, recipient age, alcohol abuse, viral hepatitis, Child-Pugh class C, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, cold ischemia time, clinical HCC stage within Milan criteria, pre-LT downstaging/bridging therapies, pre-LT alphafetoprotein serum levels, number and size of tumor nodules, microvascular invasion, and complete necrosis of all tumor nodules (matched cohort, TCR, n = 938; CS, n = 935). In a multivariate cause-specific hazard model, CS was associated with a higher risk of HCC recurrence (HR: 1.536, p = 0.007). In conclusion, TCR recipient hepatectomy, compared to the CS approach, may be associated with some protective effect against post-LT tumor recurrence.

Clinical Overview of Sarcopenia, Frailty, and Malnutrition in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis.

Sarcopenia, frailty, and malnutrition in patients with liver cirrhosis are commonly observed and are associated with higher long-term mortality. Therefore, recognizing patients with increased nutritional risk and providing recommended interventions are essential in the long- and short-term management of cirrhosis, especially as alcoholic and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease continues to rise. Various assessment tools are available to gauge frailty and malnutrition but are infrequently used. Given the global burden of liver cirrhosis, periodic screening for malnutrition, sarcopenia, and frailty is desperately needed as it improves liver transplantation outcomes. Necessary steps include addressing knowledge gaps in professional healthcare workers and patients and using standardized assessment tools to counteract physical deconditioning as early as possible. One potential method for assessing sarcopenia involves using computed tomography to evaluate the skeletal muscle index. Regarding frailty, useful tools for longitudinal assessment include the liver frailty index and the Karnofsky performance status. Addressing educational requirements related to malnutrition involves seeking guidance from dieticians, who can provide counseling on achieving sufficient calorie and protein intake to combat the progression of malnutrition.