Liver-specific Complications Research Articles

Oxaliplatin-induced spleen hypertrophy as a predictor of liver-specific complications following curative resection of colorectal liver metastases

Oxaliplatin-induced spleen hypertrophy as a predictor of liver-specific complications following curative resection of colorectal liver metastases

Improvements over time for patients following liver trauma: A 17-year observational study.

Centralisation of trauma care has been shown to be associated with improved patient outcomes. The establishment of Major Trauma Centres (MTC) and networks in England in 2012 allowed for centralisation of trauma services and specialties including hepatobiliary surgery. We aimed to investigate the outcomes for patients with hepatic injury over the last 17 years at a large MTC in England in relation to the MTC status of the centre. All patients who sustained liver trauma between 2005 and 2022 were identified using the Trauma Audit and Research Network database for a single MTC in the East Midlands. Mortality and complications were compared between patients before and after establishment of MTC status. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for complications according to MTC status, accounting for the potentially confounding variables of age, sex, severity of injuries and comorbidities for all patients, and the subgroup with severe liver trauma (AAST Grade IV and V). There were 600 patients; the median age was 33 (IQR 22-52) years and 406/600 (68%) were male. There were no significant differences in 90-day mortality or length of stay between the pre- and post-MTC patients. Multivariable logistic regression models showed both lower overall complications [OR 0.24 (95% CI 0.14, 0.39); p < 0.001] and lower liver-specific complications [OR 0.21 (95% CI 0.11, 0.39); p < 0.001] in the post-MTC period. This was also the case in the severe liver injury subgroup (p = 0.008 and p = 0.002 respectively). Outcomes for liver trauma were superior in the post-MTC period even when adjusted for patient and injury characteristics. This was the case even though patients in this period were older with more comorbidities. These data support the centralisation of trauma services for those with liver injuries.

Splenic hypertrophy predicts liver-specific complications in patients undergoing major liver resection for colorectal liver metastases, after preoperative chemotherapy

Splenic hypertrophy predicts liver-specific complications in patients undergoing major liver resection for colorectal liver metastases, after preoperative chemotherapy

What Is the Current Role and What Are the Prospects of the Robotic Approach in Liver Surgery?

Simple SummaryRobotic liver surgery is being applied with increasing frequency. Comparable, and in specific settings superior, perioperative outcomes compared to laparoscopic liver surgery have been reported. In its current form, the most commonly mentioned advantage of robotic surgery is improved dexterity. Important obstacles to its wider implementation in daily clinical practice are the associated costs, technical difficulties, and a scarce amount of evidence. Robotic liver surgery will likely continue to evolve in parallel with technological developments that enhance the robots’ abilities.In parallel with the historical development of minimally invasive surgery, the laparoscopic and robotic approaches are now frequently utilized to perform major abdominal surgical procedures. Nevertheless, the role of the robotic approach in liver surgery is still controversial, and a standardized, safe technique has not been defined yet. This review aims to summarize the currently available evidence and prospects of robotic liver surgery. Minimally invasive liver surgery has been extensively associated with benefits, in terms of less blood loss, and lower complication rates, including liver-specific complications such as clinically relevant bile leakage and post hepatectomy liver failure, when compared to open liver surgery. Furthermore, comparable R0 resection rates to open liver surgery have been reported, thus, demonstrating the safety and oncological efficiency of the minimally invasive approach. However, whether robotic liver surgery has merits over laparoscopic liver surgery is still a matter of debate. In the current literature, robotic liver surgery has mainly been associated with non-inferior outcomes compared to laparoscopy, although it is suggested that the robotic approach has a shorter learning curve, lower conversion rates, and less intraoperative blood loss. Robotic surgical systems offer a more realistic image with integrated 3D systems. In addition, the improved dexterity offered by robotic surgical systems can lead to improved intra and postoperative outcomes. In the future, integrated and improved haptic feedback mechanisms, artificial intelligence, and the introduction of more liver-specific dissectors will likely be implemented, further enhancing the robots’ abilities.

Innovation for the Sake of Innovation? How Does Robotic Hepatectomy Compare to Laparoscopic or Open Resection for HCC-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Simple SummaryRobot-assisted surgery has gained popularity in urology and colorectal surgery. Some benefits claimed are less complications and faster recovery due to a gentler approach. We aimed to evaluate current evidence on robot-assisted surgery in HCC resection in comparison to standard approaches—laparoscopic and open resections through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Robot-assisted resection was comparable to standardly utilized methods in terms of complication rates. Major complications occurred less but liver-specific complications, such as liver dysfunction or biliary leakage, were similar in frequency. Prospective studies are lacking but are needed to evaluate which patients would really benefit from robot-assisted liver surgery.Robot-assisted hepatectomy is a novel approach to treat liver tumors. HCC is on the rise as the cause of cancer and mortality and is often preceded by cirrhosis. Robot-assisted hepatectomy has been suggested to offer benefits to cirrhotic patients. We aimed to evaluate current evidence for robot-assisted hepatectomy for HCC and compare it to open and laparoscopic approaches. This systematic review and meta-analysis has been conducted in accordance with most recent PRISMA recommendations and the protocol has been registered at PROSPERO (CRD42022328544). There were no randomized controlled trials available and no study focused on cirrhotic patients exclusively. Robot-assisted hepatectomy was associated with less major complications than the laparoscopic approach, but comparable with open hepatectomy. No difference was seen in overall or minor complications, as well as liver specific or infectious complications. Cumulative survivals were similar in robot-assisted hepatectomy and laparoscopic or open approaches. There is a clear lack of evidence to suggest particular benefits for robot-assisted hepatectomy in cirrhotic patients. Otherwise, the robot-assisted approach has similar complication rates as open or laparoscopic methods. Non-industry driven randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy of robot-assisted liver surgery.

Suitability of Laparoscopic Liver Resection of Segment VII: a Retrospective Two-Center Study

BackgroundResecting liver tumors located in Couinaud’s segment VII is challenging; the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic liver resection for segment VII lesions compared to open liver resection remain unclear. MethodsMedical records of 84 patients who underwent liver resection of segment VII at Kobe University Hospital and Hyogo Cancer Center between 2010 and 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Surgical outcomes were compared between laparoscopic liver resection and open liver resection groups using propensity matching analysis. ResultsThirty-one and 53 patients underwent laparoscopic liver resection and open liver resection, respectively. After propensity matching, 29 patients were included in each group. The laparoscopic liver resection group had a significantly longer operation time (407 vs. 305 min, P = 0.002), lower blood loss (100 vs. 230 mL, P = 0.004), and higher postoperative alanine aminotransferase levels (436 vs. 252 IU/L, P = 0.008) than the open liver resection group. In patients with liver cirrhosis, the proportion of patients with postoperative liver-specific complications was higher in the laparoscopic liver resection group than in the open liver resection group (57% vs 11%, P = 0.049), although there was no significant difference in postoperative liver-specific complication rates between the groups in patients without liver cirrhosis. ConclusionsFor liver resection of segment VII, laparoscopic liver resection led to higher postoperative liver damage than open liver resection. Open liver resection may be better for patients with liver cirrhosis to avoid postoperative liver-specific complications. Laparoscopic liver resection could be an acceptable procedure for patients without liver cirrhosis, with some merits such as less blood loss.

Routine Postoperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis Offers No Benefit after Hepatectomy-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Prophylactic antibiotics are frequently administered after major abdominal surgery including hepatectomies aiming to prevent infective complications. Yet, excessive use of antibiotics increases resistance in bacteria. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics after hepatectomy (postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis, POA). Method: This systematic review and meta-analysis were completed according to the current PRISMA guidelines. The protocol has been registered prior to data extraction (PROSPERO registration Nr: CRD42021288510). MEDLINE, Web of Science and CENTRAL were searched for clinical reports on POA in hepatectomy restrictions. A random-effects model was used for synthesis. Methodological quality was assessed with RoB2 and ROBINS-I. GRADE was used for the quality of evidence assessment. Results: Nine comparative studies comprising 2987 patients were identified: six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and three retrospectives. POA did not lead to a reduction in postoperative infective complications or have an effect on liver-specific complications—post-hepatectomy liver failure and biliary leaks. POA over four or more days was associated with increased rates of deep surgical site infections compared to short-term administration for up to two days (OR 1.54; 95% CI [1.17;2.03]; p = 0.03). Routine POA led to significantly higher MRSA incidence as a pathogen (p = 0.0073). Overall, the risk of bias in the studies was low and the quality of evidence moderate. Conclusion: Routine POA cannot be recommended after hepatectomy since it does not reduce postoperative infection or liver-specific complications but contributes to resistance in bacteria. Studies into individualized risk-adapted antibiotic prophylaxis strategies are needed to further optimize perioperative treatment in liver surgery.

Con: Patients With Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure Should Not Receive Priority on the Waiting List.

Content available: Audio Recording.

Is metabolic syndrome a risk factor in hepatectomy? A meta-analysis with subgroup analysis for histologically confirmed hepatic manifestations

BackgroundMetabolic syndrome (MetS) is a risk factor in surgery. MetS can progress to metabolic (dysfunction)-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), a vast-growing etiology of primary liver tumors which are major indications for liver surgery. The aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate the impact of MetS on complications and long-term outcomes after hepatectomy.MethodsThe protocol for this meta-analysis was registered at PROSPERO prior to data extraction. MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for publications on liver resections and MetS. Comparative studies were included. Outcomes encompassed postoperative complications, mortality, and long-term oncologic status. Data were pooled as odds ratio (OR) with a random-effects model. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool (QUIPS), and the certainty of the evidence was evaluated with GRADE. Subgroup analyses for patients with histopathologically confirmed non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) versus controls were performed.ResultsThe meta-analyses included fifteen comparative studies. Patients with MetS suffered significantly more overall complications (OR 1.55; 95% CI [1.05; 2.29]; p=0.03), major complications (OR 1.97 95% CI [1.13; 3.43]; p=0.02; I2=62%), postoperative hemorrhages (OR 1.76; 95% CI [1.23; 2.50]; p=0.01) and infections (OR 1.63; 95% CI [1.03; 2.57]; p=0.04). There were no significant differences in mortality, recurrence, 1- or 5-year overall or recurrence-free survivals. Patients with histologically confirmed NAFLD did not have significantly more overall complications; however, PHLF rates were increased (OR 4.87; 95% CI [1.22; 19.47]; p=0.04). Recurrence and survival outcomes did not differ significantly. The certainty of the evidence for each outcome ranged from low to very low.ConclusionPatients with MetS that undergo liver surgery suffer more complications, such as postoperative hemorrhage and infection but not liver-specific complications—PHLF and biliary leakage. Histologically confirmed NAFLD is associated with significantly higher PHLF rates, yet, survivals of these patients are similar to patients without the MetS. Further studies should focus on identifying the tipping point for increased risk in patients with MetS-associated liver disease, as well as reliable markers of MAFLD stages and early markers of PHLF.Trial registrationPROSPERO Nr: CRD42021253768

Outcome of Major Liver Resections with Routine Use of Pringle’s Maneuver: Single Team Experience from Developing HPB Unit of University Teaching Hospital

Background: With improved perioperative care and improvement in surgical techniques have led to excellent outcomes following major liver resections. Inflow occlusion is selectively used these days. However, at our center, we routinely use Pringle‘s Maneuver during major liver resections. This study is done to analyze the outcome of major liver resections with routine use of Pringle’s Maneuver. Method: Retrospective review of the medical records of the patients (Oct 2011 to July 2021) undergoing major liver resections performed by single team with routine use of Pringle’s Maneuver was analyzed. Major liver resections were defined by resections of three or more segments of liver. Indications, types of resections, various preoperative and intraoperative parameters including blood loss, duration of surgery and postoperative outcomes according to Clavien Dindo classification was performed. Incidence of Post hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) and other liver surgery specific complications were also analyzed. Results: Total 65 major liver resections with Pringle‘s maneuver was performed, 13 extended resections, 20 right, 16 left and 16 nonanatomical resections. Average inflow occlusion was 20 minutes (Range: 5- 30 minutes). Postoperative morbidity was 30%. Blood transfusion required in 13(20%). Liver specific complications included bile leak (7, 10.7%), PHLF (5, 7.6%). There was single perioperative mortality. Conclusion: Perioperative outcomes of major liver resections with the use of Pringle ‘s maneuver is in acceptable range.

Changing clinical management of NAFLD in Asia.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has become the leading cause of chronic liver disease, affecting approximately 25% of the world's population. Recently, because of the sedentary lifestyle and overnutrition resulting from urbanisation, the burden of NAFLD has rapidly increased in many Asian countries. Currently, the prevalence of NAFLD in Asia is approximately 30%, as is the case in many Western countries. In Asia, the prevalence and presentation of NAFLD vary widely across regions because of the substantial diversity in race, socioeconomic status and living environment. Furthermore, the dual aetiology of fatty liver, particularly with viral hepatitis in Asia, makes it complex and challenging to manage. Because Asians are likely to have central adiposity and insulin resistance, approximately 7%-20% of non-obese Asians with body mass indexes of less than 25kg/m2 are estimated to have NAFLD. Accumulating evidence indicates that NAFLD is associated with various extrahepatic comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, malignancy, in addition to liver-specific complications. Therefore, NAFLD should be managed as a multisystem disease in conjunction with metabolic syndrome. Lifestyle modification remains the basis of NAFLD management, but few patients can achieve adequate weight loss and maintain it long term. While various pharmacological agents are in phase 3 trials for steatohepatitis, Asian patients are underrepresented in most trials. This article reviews the epidemiological trends, clinical features, optimal assessment and current management practices for NAFLD in Asia.

Short-term postoperative outcomes after liver resection in the elderly patient: a nationwide population-based study

BackgroundLiver resection is high-risk surgery in particular in elderly patients. The aim of this study was to explore postoperative outcomes after liver resection in elderly patients. MethodsIn this nationwide study, all patients who underwent liver resection for primary and secondary liver tumours in the Netherlands between 2014 and 2019 were included. Age groups were composed as younger than 70 (70-), between 70 and 80 (septuagenarians), and 80 years or older (octogenarians). Proportion of liver resections per age group and 30-day major morbidity and 30-day mortality were assessed. ResultsIn total, 6587 patients were included of whom 4023 (58.9%) were younger than 70, 2135 (32.4%) were septuagenarians and 429 (6.5%) were octogenarians. The proportion of septuagenarians increased during the study period (aOR:1.06, CI:1.02–1.09, p < 0.001). Thirty-day major morbidity was higher in septuagenarians (11%) and octogenarians (12%) compared to younger patients (9%, p = 0.049). Thirty-day mortality was higher in septuagenarians (4%) and octogenarians (4%) compared to younger patients (2%, p < 0.001). Cardiopulmonary complications occurred more frequently with higher age, liver-specific complications did not. Higher age was associated with higher 30-day morbidity and 30-day mortality in multivariable logistic regression. ConclusionThirty-day major morbidity and 30-day mortality are higher after liver resection in elderly patients, attributed mainly to non-surgical cardiopulmonary complications.

Laparoscopic versus open hemihepatectomy: comprehensive comparison of complications and costs at 90\xa0days using a propensity method

Laparoscopic hemihepatectomy (LHH) may offer advantages over open hemihepatectomy (OHH) in blood loss, recovery, and hospital stay. The aim of this study is to evaluate our recent experience performing hemihepatectomy and compare complications and costs up to 90 days following laparoscopic versus open procedures. Retrospective evaluation of patients undergoing hemihepatectomy at our center 01/2010–12/2018 was performed. Patient, tumor, and surgical characteristics; 90-day complications; and costs were analyzed. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance covariates. A total of 141 hemihepatectomies were included: 96 OHH and 45 LHH. While operative times were longer for LHH, blood loss and transfusions were less. At 90 days, there were similar rates of liver-specific and surgical complications but fewer medical complications following LHH. Medical complications that arose with greater frequency following OHH were primarily pulmonary complications and urinary and central venous catheter infections. Complications at 90 days were lower following LHH (Clavien–Dindo grade ≥ III OHH 23%, LHH 11%, p = 0.130; Comprehensive Complication Index OHH 20.0 ± 16.1, LHH 10.9 ± 14.2, p = 0.001). While operating costs were higher, costs for hospital stay and readmissions were lower with LHH. Patients undergoing LHH experience a significant reduction in postoperative medical complications and costs, resulting in 90-day cost equity compared with OHH.

Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Child-Pugh A Patients With and Without Portal Hypertension: A Multicentre Study.

Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) may improve outcomes for cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal hypertension (PHT). The aim of this study was to compare the short-term outcomes after LLR for HCC in cirrhotic patients with and without PHT. This multicentric study included 96 HCC patients who underwent LLR. Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) was defined by a hepatic venous pressure gradient ≥10mmHg. Short-term outcomes and liver-specific complications including post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF), ascites and encephalopathy were compared between patients with and without CSPH. Thirty-one patients (32%) had CSPH. The CSPH group had higher post-operative morbidity (52% vs. 15%; p < 0.001), PHLF (10% vs. 0%; p = 0.03) and encephalopathy (10% vs. 0%; p = 0.03). There was no difference in terms of post-operative ascites between the two groups (CSPH: 16% vs. no CPSH: 8%, p = 0.28). The length of stay was longer in patients with CSPH than in those without CSPH (6 vs. 4days; p < 0.001). The laparoscopic approach is feasible in selected HCC patients with CSPH, at the price of significant increases in liver-specific complications and length of stay.

The Association Between Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease, Stroke, and Extrahepatic Cancers

Although primarily a disease with liver-specific complications, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a systemic disease with extrahepatic complications. We aim to evaluate the association between NAFLD and cardiovascular disease (CVD), stroke and cerebrovascular disease, and extrahepatic cancers. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Systematic Review Database from January 1, 2000 to July 1, 2019 to identify peer-reviewed English language literature using predefined keywords for NAFLD, CVD, stroke and cerebrovascular disease, and extrahepatic cancers among adults. Two reviewers independently selected studies for inclusion. Measures of association between NAFLD and CVD, stroke and cerebrovascular disease, and extrahepatic cancers were extracted. Quality assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa scale and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Thirty studies were included evaluating CVD, 16 studies evaluating stroke or cerebrovascular disease, and 13 studies evaluating extrahepatic cancers. On pooled meta-analysis assessment, NAFLD was associated with increased risk of CVD (risk ratio [RR]: 1.78; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.52-2.08) and stroke or cerebrovascular disease (RR: 2.08, 95% CI: 1.72-2.51). Significant heterogeneity in assessing extrahepatic cancers prevented applying meta-analysis methods, but NAFLD seemed to be associated with increased risk of breast and colorectal cancers. Overall level of quality of studies were very low by GRADE. NAFLD is associated with increased risks of CVD and stroke or cerebrovascular disease among adults. There appears to be increased risk of breast and colorectal cancers. Given low quality of evidence, it is premature to make any strong conclusions to modify CVD, stroke, or cancer screening policies in patients with NAFLD.

Overall Body Composition and Sarcopenia Are Associated with Poor Liver Hypertrophy Following Portal Vein Embolization

PurposeTo explore whether body composition and/or sarcopenia are associated with liver hypertrophy following portal vein embolization (PVE) in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM). MethodsPatients with CLM who underwent right PVE prior to a planned right hepatectomy were identified from the institutional liver database from 2004 to 2014. Patients were excluded due to previous liver-directed therapy/hepatectomy, right PVE + segment IV embolization, or planned 2-stage hepatectomy. Advanced imaging software was used to measure body compartment volumes (cm2), which were standardized to height (m2) to create an index: skeletal muscle index (SMI), subcutaneous adipose index (SAI), and visceral adipose index (VAI). SMI, gender, and body mass index (BMI) were used to define sarcopenia. The main outcome of interest was hypertrophy of the future liver remnant (FLR) following PVE, which was reported as degree of hypertrophy (DH) and kinetic growth rate (KGR). ResultsPatients were evenly divided into three KGR groups: lower third (KGR:0.7–2.0%), middle third (KGR:2.0–4.1%), and upper third (KGR:4.2–12.3%). Patients in the lower third KGR group had a lower VAI (31.0 vs 53.0 vs 54.5 cm2/m2, p = 0.042) and were more commonly sarcopenic (60%) compared to the upper third (20%, p = 0.025). Eighteen patients (40%) met criteria for sarcopenia. Sarcopenic patients had a lower VAI (29.1 vs 57.4 cm2/m2, p = 0.004), lesser degree of hypertrophy (8.3% vs 15.2%, p = 0.009), and lower KGR (2.0% vs 4.0%, p = 0.012). ConclusionSarcopenia and associated body composition indices are strongly associated with clinically relevant impaired liver regeneration, which may result in increased liver-specific complications following hepatectomy for CLM.

Effectiveness of terlipressin for prevention of complications after major liver resection – A randomized placebo-controlled trial

BackgroundElevated portal pressure in response to major liver resection is associated with impaired liver regeneration and increased postoperative complications. Terlipressin, a splanchnic vasoconstrictor used for treatment of hepatorenal syndrome, was tested for reduction of complications and renal protection after liver resection. MethodsA randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial including patients undergoing elective major liver resection was performed. Terlipressin was administered to patients in the intervention group for five days. The primary outcome parameter was the incidence of a clinical composite endpoint of following liver specific complications 6 weeks after surgery: liver failure, ascites, bile leakage, intra-abdominal abscess and operative mortality. Postoperative kidney function was assessed as a secondary endpoint. Results150 patients (mean age 63.4 years, 73.3% male) were included. No difference was found in the composite endpoint between the placebo and intervention group (32.8% versus 30.8%, relative risk 1.066, 95%CI 0.643 to 1.769, p = 0.85). Patients receiving terlipressin showed a significant lower decrease in postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate compared to placebo (two way ANOVA, p = 0.005). ConclusionPerioperative administration of terlipressin during major liver surgery did not affect a composite endpoint of liver specific complications, but significantly protected from postoperative deterioration of kidney function compared to placebo. Clinicaltrials.gov identifierNCT01921985.

HCV-infected individuals have higher prevalence of comorbidity and multimorbidity: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundAlmost 1% of Canadians are hepatitis C (HCV)-infected. The liver-specific complications of HCV are established but the extra-hepatic comorbidity, multimorbidity, and its relationship with HCV treatment, is less well known. We describe the morbidity burden for people with HCV and the relationship between multimorbidity and HCV treatment uptake and cure in the pre- and post-direct acting antiviral (DAA) era.MethodsWe linked adults with HCV at The Ottawa Hospital Viral Hepatitis Program as of April 1, 2017 to provincial health administrative data and matched on age and sex to 5 Ottawa-area residents for comparison. We used validated algorithms to identify the prevalence of mental and physical health comorbidities, as well as multimorbidity (2+ comorbidities). We calculated direct age- and sex-standardized rates of comorbidity and comparisons were made by interferon-based and interferon-free, DAA HCV treatments.ResultsThe mean age of the study population was 54.5 years (SD 11.4), 65% were male. Among those with HCV, 4% were HIV co-infected, 26% had liver cirrhosis, 47% received DAA treatment, and 57% were cured of HCV. After accounting for age and sex differences, the HCV group had greater multimorbidity (prevalence ratio (PR) 1.38, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20 to 1.58) and physical-mental health multimorbidity (PR 2.71, 95% CI 2.29–3.20) compared to the general population. Specifically, prevalence ratios for people with HCV were significantly higher for diabetes, renal failure, cancer, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, substance use disorder, mood and anxiety disorders and liver failure. HCV treatment and cure were not associated with multimorbidity, but treatment prevalence was significantly lower among middle-aged individuals with substance use disorders despite no differences in prevalence of cure among those treated.ConclusionPeople with HCV have a higher prevalence of comorbidity and multimorbidity compared to the general population. While HCV treatment was not associated with multimorbidity, people with substance use disorder were less likely to be treated. Our results point to the need for integrated, comprehensive models of care delivery for people with HCV.

Short-Term Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Portal Vein Embolization: an ACS-NSQIP Procedure-Targeted Hepatectomy Analysis

BackgroundPreoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) is utilized to induce growth of the future liver remnant volume (FLRV) among patients at elevated risk of post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). MethodsThe American College of Surgery National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was used to compare short-term outcomes of PVE versus non-PVE patients. A propensity score match (PSM) was used to compare short-term outcomes among PVE and non-PVE patients. ResultsAmong the 11,243 patients included in the study, 462 (4.1%) patients had a PVE. Postoperatively, patients who underwent PVE had a higher incidence of overall (PVE, 44% vs. non-PVE, 23%) and liver-specific complications (biliary leak PVE, 16% vs. non-PVE, 7%; post-hepatectomy liver failure [PHLF] PVE, 17% vs. non-PVE, 5%), as well as a longer length of stay (> 7 days PVE, 39% vs. non-PVE, 22%) compared with the non-PVE group (all p < 0.001). After PSM, no differences in mortality or LOS were observed among PVE and non-PVE patients. PVE patients remained more likely to have a bile leak, organ/surgical-site infection, and PHLF versus non-PVE patients (all p < 0.05). ConclusionAmong patients who underwent PVE before hepatectomy, the risk of postoperative complications was 1.6-fold higher than non-PVE patients. After PSM, PVE patients still had an increased risk of complications.

Preoperative Portal Vein Embolization Is Not Associated with Increased Postoperative Complications After Major Hepatectomy: a Study of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Database

BackgroundPreoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) is selectively performed to induce hypertrophy of the future liver remnant prior to major liver resection. The primary aim of this study was to determine the association of PVE with liver-specific and overall postoperative morbidity. MethodsA retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent major hepatectomy from 2014 to 2016 within the ACS-NSQIP hepatectomy-specific module was performed. ResultsOf the 3912 patients identified, 9.9% (N = 388) underwent PVE. Patients who underwent PVE were older (59.1 vs. 57.7 years). Most patients in the PVE cohort underwent right hepatectomy (51.8%, N = 201) or trisectionectomy (46.1%, N = 179), compared with right (49.3%, N = 1738) and left hepatectomy (29.6%, N = 1042) in the non-PVE cohort (p < 0.001). Median operative time was longer in the PVE group (310 vs. 276 min, p < 0.001). Post-hepatectomy liver failure was more common among patients undergoing PVE (18.6% (N = 72) vs. 9.9% (N = 350), p < 0.001), as was bile leak (17.3% (N = 67) vs. 12.2% (N = 428), p = 0.005). Overall complication rates were higher among patients who underwent PVE (45.9% (N = 178) vs. 34.0% (N = 1199), p < 0.001). However, on multivariable analysis controlling for patient and technical factors, PVE remained associated with an increased risk of liver-specific complications (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.01–1.74) but not with overall complications (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.92–1.50). ConclusionWithin a national cohort, patients treated with PVE are older and undergo a more extensive liver resection. When controlling for patient and technical factors, PVE is neither associated with an increase in overall morbidity nor mortality, suggesting that PVE can be safely used in appropriate patients undergoing major hepatectomy.