Liver Biopsy For Assessment Of Fibrosis Research Articles

Application of alkaline phosphatase‑to‑platelet ratio as a novel noninvasive index predicts liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B.

Assessment of the extent of liver fibrosis is a crucial requirement for the design of antiviral treatments for patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Several non-invasive predictive indices have been developed as potential alternatives to liver biopsy for fibrosis assessment. The present study aimed to establish a novel non-invasive method for predicting liver fibrosis in patients with CHB. A total of 382 patients with CHB who underwent liver biopsy and pathological examination at The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University (Hefei, China) were enrolled into the present study. Liver fibrosis was assessed according to the meta-analysis of histological data in viral hepatitis scoring system. Logistic regression analyses were performed to explore possibly significant characteristics associated with liver fibrosis. In addition, potential correlations between the alkaline phosphatase (AKP)-to-platelet count (PLT) ratio (APPR) and the aspartate transaminase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), fibrosis index based on four factors (FIB-4) and γ-glutamyl transpeptidase-to-platelet ratio (GPR) were assessed using Spearman's correlation analysis. Subsequently, the performance of APPR was compared with APRI, FIB-4 and GPR using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Logistic regression analysis identified AKP and PLT to be significant independent predictors of fibrosis. Therefore, an index was then constructed for predicting the degree of fibrosis, which was expressed using the formula APPR=AKP (IU/ml)/PLT (1x109/l). APPR was found to be positively associated with the fibrotic stage of the liver in addition to being positively correlated with APRI, FIB-4 and GPR. The area under the ROC curve (AUROC) values of APPR were also significantly higher compared with those of APRI and FIB-4 in predicting significant fibrosis but were equal to those of GPR. However, for advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis, the AUROC value of APPR was shown to be higher compared with that of APRI, FIB-4 and GPR. In conclusion, these observations suggest that APPR is a viable marker that can be used to assess liver fibrosis in patients with CHB.

Updates in the quantitative assessment of liver fibrosis for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Histological perspective.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NAFLD/NASH) is a major cause of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. Accurate assessment of liver fibrosis is important for predicting disease outcomes and assessing therapeutic response in clinical practice and clinical trials. Although noninvasive tests such as transient elastography and magnetic resonance elastography are preferred where possible, histological assessment of liver fibrosis via semiquantitative scoring systems remains the current gold standard. Collagen proportionate area provides more granularity by measuring the percentage of fibrosis on a continuous scale, but is limited by the absence of architectural input. Although not yet used in routine clinical practice, advances in second harmonic generation/two-photon excitation fluorescence (SHG/TPEF) microscopy imaging show great promise in characterising architectural features of fibrosis at the individual collagen fiber level. Quantification and calculation of different detailed variables of collagen fibers can be used to establish algorithm-based quantitative fibrosis scores (e.g., qFibrosis, q-FPs), which have been validated against fibrosis stage in NAFLD. Artificial intelligence is being explored to further refine and develop quantitative fibrosis scoring methods. SHG-microscopy shows promise as the new gold standard for the quantitative measurement of liver fibrosis. This has reaffirmed the pivotal role of the liver biopsy in fibrosis assessment in NAFLD, at least for the near-future. The ability of SHG-derived algorithms to intuitively detect subtle nuances in liver fibrosis changes over a continuous scale should be employed to redress the efficacy endpoint for fibrosis in NASH clinical trials; this approach may improve the outcomes of the trials evaluating therapeutic response to antifibrotic drugs.

Accuracy of Liver Fibrosis Degree Based on King’s Score to FibroScan in Chronic Hepatitis B

Background: A great interest has been dedicated to the development of non-invasive predictive models in recent years to substitute liver biopsy for fibrosis assessment and follow-up. Cross et al proposed King’s score, age (years) x aspartate aminotransferase/AST (IU/L) x [international normalized ratio (INR)/platelets (109/L)]. This study aims to investigate the accuracy of King’s score for predicting liver fibrosis in patients with chronic Hepatitis B.Method: From February until July 2013, sixty two patients confirmed chronic Hepatitis B, underwent FibroScan in Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology at Haji Adam Malik Hospital, Medan. Serum obtained and analyzed for AST, INR, and pancreolauryl test (PLT) activity, and the King’s score was computed. Liver fibrosis pathology was staged according to a defined system on a scale of F0 to F4 in FibroScan. We used predictive values to assess the accuracy of King’s score.Results: King’s score greater than or equal to 12,3 in predicted significant fibrosis has 48.1% sensitivity, 88.6% specificity, 76.5% positive predictive value (PPV), 68.9% negative predictive value (NPV). King’s score greater than or equal to 16,7 in predicted cirrhosis has 83.3% sensitivity, 85.7% specificity, 38.5% positive predictive value (PPV), 98% negative predictive value (NPV). The validation set confirmed the utility of this index, area under receiver operating characteristic curves for each non-significant and cirrhosis was 0,684 (95% CI: 0,545-0,822; p = 0,014) and 0,845 (95% CI: 0,664-1,027; p = 0,006), respectively.Conclusion: The King’s score predicts cirrhosis (grade-4 fibrosis) in patients with chronic Hepatitis B with a high degree of accuracy, potentially decreases the need for liver biopsy.

Simpler score of routine laboratory tests predicts liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B

In recent years, a great interest has been dedicated to the development of noninvasive predictive models to substitute liver biopsy for fibrosis assessment and follow-up. Our aim was to provide a simpler model consisting of routine laboratory markers for predicting liver fibrosis in patients chronically infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) in order to optimize their clinical management. Liver fibrosis was staged in 386 chronic HBV carriers who underwent liver biopsy and routine laboratory testing. Correlations between routine laboratory markers and fibrosis stage were statistically assessed. After logistic regression analysis, a novel predictive model was constructed. This S index was validated in an independent cohort of 146 chronic HBV carriers in comparison to the SLFG model, Fibrometer, Hepascore, Hui model, Forns score and APRI using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The diagnostic values of each marker panels were better than single routine laboratory markers. The S index consisting of gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT), platelets (PLT) and albumin (ALB) (S-index: 1000 x GGT/(PLT x ALB(2))) had a higher diagnostic accuracy in predicting degree of fibrosis than any other mathematical model tested. The areas under the ROC curves (AUROC) were 0.812 and 0.890 for predicting significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in the validation cohort, respectively. The S index, a simpler mathematical model consisting of routine laboratory markers predicts significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic HBV infection with a high degree of accuracy, potentially decreasing the need for liver biopsy.

Assessment of fibrosis in chronic liver diseases

The assessment of liver fibrosis provides useful information not only for diagnosis but also for therapeutic decisions. Although liver biopsy is the current gold standard for fibrosis assessment, it has some risks and limitations, including intra-observer and inter-observer variation, sampling error and variability. In recent years, many studies and great interest have been dedicated to the development of non-invasive tests to substitute a liver biopsy for fibrosis assessment and follow up. Advances in serological and radiological tests such as serum marker panels, transient elastography and their combinations can assess fibrosis accurately and reduce the need for a liver biopsy. But at present, all have failed to completely replace a liver biopsy because of their respective limitations and an imperfect gold standard used in current researches. The searching for an ideal surrogate is still in progress.