Living Donor Liver Transplantation Research Articles

Liver transplantation for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine liver metastasis: optimal patient selection and perioperative management in the era of multimodal treatments.

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NET) often metastasize to the liver. Although curative liver resection provides a favorable prognosis for patients with neuroendocrine liver metastasis (NELM), with a 5-year survival rate of 70-80%, recurrence is almost inevitable, mainly in the remnant liver. In Western countries, liver transplantation (LT) has been performed in patients with NELM, with the objective of complete removal of macro- and micro-NELMs. However, prognosis had been unsatisfactory, with 5-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates of approximately 50 and 30%, respectively. In 2007, the Milan criteria were proposed as indications for LT for NELM. The criteria included: (1) confirmed histology of NET-G1 or G2; (2) a primary tumor drained by the portal system and all extrahepatic diseases removed with curative resection before LT; (3) liver involvement ≤50%; (4) good response or stable disease for at least 6months before LT; (5) age ≤ 55years. A subsequent report demonstrated outstanding LT outcomes for NELM within the Milan criteria, with 5-year overall survival and recurrence rates of 97 and 13%, respectively. In Japan, living donor LT (LDLT) for NELM has been performed sporadically in only 16 patients by 2021 in Japan; however, no consensus has been reached on the indications or perioperative management of LDLT. This article presents the outcomes of these 16 patients who underwent LDLT in Japan and reviews the literature to clarify optimal indications and perioperative management of LDLT for NELM in the era of novel multimodal treatments.

Challenges and strategies in managing severe portopulmonary hypertension during living donor liver transplantation: A clinical case study

Challenges and strategies in managing severe portopulmonary hypertension during living donor liver transplantation: A clinical case study

Clinicopathological Characteristics of Neutrophil-Rich Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Uncommon Subtype of Primary Liver Cancer.

Introduction. Neutrophil-rich hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an extremely uncommon subtype of HCC with an overall incidence of <1%. Neutrophil-rich HCC shows poor cellular differentiation and sarcomatoid transformation in most patients. There is prominent neutrophilic inflammatory cell infiltration in the tumor. These tumors are associated with poor prognosis, high rate of recurrence, and metastasis. Methods. Herein, we investigated 4 patients with neutrophil-rich HCC reported at our center. Clinical, radiological, and pathological findings were reviewed. Immunophenotypic characterization of the tumors were done. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), and mismatch repair immunostains were performed in all 4 tumors. Results. We report 4 neutrophil-rich HCCs in 3 male patients and one female patient with an age range of 43 to 64 years. Three underwent living donor liver transplantation and one underwent right hepatectomy. Tumor measured 0.5 cm to 12 cm in maximum dimension. Histologically, tumors demonstrated moderate to marked cellular pleomorphism. Spindle cell transformation was noted in 3 tumors. Three tumors showed vascular invasion, and one tumor showed bile duct invasion. Immunopositivity for Hep Par-1, arginase-1, and glypican-3 was present in all tumors. Tumors also expressed stemness markers including KRT19 and EpCAM. Cytoplasmic positivity for G-CSF and immunoexpression of PD-L1 was demonstrated. We also report proficient mismatch repair by immunohistochemistry in all tumors. Conclusion. Neutrophil-rich HCC is an aggressive primary liver cancer which demonstrates stemness-related features. Programmed cell death ligand 1 expression in tumor cells suggests distinct immunogenic features and potential role of anti-PD-L1 therapies in inoperable disease.

Early Outcomes Of Living Donor Liver Transplant Recipients In A University Teaching Hospital Of Nepal

Introduction: The burden of chronic liver disease (CLD) is on the rise and liver transplantation remains the best treatment modality for the end stage liver disease (ESLD). Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital has started doing living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and we aim to report our experience and early postoperative outcomes of the first 10 living donor liver transplants performed in our institute. Methods: This is a retrospective review and included all patients who were operated for LDLT from the year 2019 to 2023 for various indications. Demographic data, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, Child score, etiology of CLD, liver graft type, graft-to-recipient weight ratio, operative time, blood transfusion and complications were analysed. Results: From 2019 to 2023, in total, 10 patients underwent LDLT, including one paediatric transplant. The most common etiology was alcohol (50%) and right lobe was the preferred graft. The average operative time was 7.9 ± 2.56 hours. There were no re exploration or re transplantation. The mean duration of hospital stay was around 21.37 ± 6.43 days. All patients were followed for one to five years. Four recipients had Clavien Dindo Grade II and above complications, including bile leak and post-operative bleeding. One mortality occurred on 27th post-operative day due to covid infection. Conclusions: Living donor liver transplantation is a feasible option for patients with end stage liver disease and is safe to be performed in low volume centre with the help of expertise and good team work.

Two cases of living donor liver transplantation for colorectal liver metastases in Korea

Two cases of living donor liver transplantation for colorectal liver metastases in Korea

Outcomes of living donor liver transplantation in patients with concurrent extrahepatic malignancy

Outcomes of living donor liver transplantation in patients with concurrent extrahepatic malignancy

Small for size syndrome in living donor liver transplantation- Prevention and management

Small for size syndrome in living donor liver transplantation- Prevention and management

First series of Living Donor Liver Retransplants from India: Challenges and Outcomes

BackgroundThere is paucity of Indian data on long term survival after living donor liver transplant (LDLT) or the need for retransplant. In this article, we report the first series of retransplants from India with focus on indications, technical challenges and results. MethodsRetrospective study on 29 patients undergoing a liver retransplant (re-LT) was analysed with respect to survival outcomes and post operative complications. Patients were divided into early and late retransplant groups based on whether re-LT was performed within or beyond 30 days of primary transplant. ResultsLiver retransplant was performed in 29 (0.81%) patients out of a total of 3563 liver transplants ( 28 living donor and 1 deceased donor liver transplant). The primary transplant was a LDLT in 27 (93%) patients. Retransplant was performed at a median of 26 days after the first transplant. Re-LT was performed early (within 30 days) in 17 (59%) patients and late (beyond 30 days) in 12 (41%). Hepatic artery thrombosis (53%) and early graft dysfunction (47%) were the indications for early retransplant while biliary complications (50%) and chronic rejection (33%) were primary indications for late retransplant. Post retransplant complications occurred in 22 (75%) patients, the commonest being gram negative bacterial sepsis.The 30-day mortality following retransplant was 27% (8 of 29). The primary cause of mortality was gram negative septicemia. The mortality in the late retransplant group (2, 16.6%) was lower compared to the early retransplant group (6,35%). ConclusionRe-transplant using living donors is a viable option in properly selected patients with prior LDLT.

Management of preoperative recipient portal vein thrombosis in living donor liver transplantation

Management of preoperative recipient portal vein thrombosis in living donor liver transplantation

Digital single-operator cholangioscopy for difficult anastomotic biliary strictures in living donor liver transplantation recipients after failure of standard ERCP: SPYPASS-2 study

Digital single-operator cholangioscopy for difficult anastomotic biliary strictures in living donor liver transplantation recipients after failure of standard ERCP: SPYPASS-2 study

Splenectomy Before Recipient Hepatectomy for Inflow Modulation Using a Very Small Modified Right Hemiliver Graft: A Case Report

Portal inflow modulation has become standard practice in many transplant centers performing living donor liver transplantation. This is believed to counteract the deleterious effects of excess portal flow into a small-for-size graft. A splenectomy negates the contribution of the splenic vein flow completely and thereby substantially reduces portal inflow. Although it has been adopted as a standard strategy by many Japanese centers for inflow modulation, especially while using left hemiliver grafts, there is justifiable apprehension about its usage due to potential increases in morbidity. Described here is a splenectomy performed while using a modified right hemiliver graft with a graft to recipient weight ratio of 0.49. The challenges in decision making and reasons regarding how such a small graft might have worked without manifestations of small-for-size/flow syndrome are discussed.

Recurrence of HCC after living donor liver transplantation, retrospective cohort study of a single centre experience.

Recurrence of HCC after living donor liver transplantation, retrospective cohort study of a single centre experience.

The small-for-size syndrome in living donor liver transplantation: current management.

Small-for-size syndrome poses a significant challenge in living donor liver transplantation, with potentially severe consequences including liver failure and death. This review explores the management strategies for SFSS, starting from the pathophysiology of the disease. SFSS arises from insufficient liver mass in the graft and hyperdynamic circulation in cirrhotic recipients, leading to portal hyperperfusion and subsequent liver injury. Risk factors include graft size, quality, recipient factors, and hemodynamic changes during transplantation.Hemodynamic monitoring is crucial during living donor liver transplantation to optimize portal vein and hepatic artery flow. Prevention strategies focus on donor-recipient matching and intraoperative graft inflow modulation. Optimizing venous outflow and avoiding portal hyperperfusion is essential. Management of established small-for-size syndrome involves supportive care, pharmacologic interventions, and radiological and surgical options. Pharmacotherapy includes somatostatin analogues, beta-blockers, and vasopressin analogues to reduce portal flow and pressure. Surgical interventions aim to modulate portal flow and mitigate complications. Retransplantation may be necessary in severe cases, guided by persistent graft dysfunction despite liver flow modulations. In conclusion, preventing and managing small-for-size syndrome in living donor liver transplantation requires comprehensive assessment and tailored interventions. Advancements in graft/recipient matching, hemodynamic monitoring, pharmacologic and surgical techniques aiming to inflow modulation have improved outcomes, enabling successful transplantation even with ultra-small grafts.

Letter to the editor: Improved outcomes of ABO incompatible living donor liver transplant with biologically related donors.

Letter to the editor: Improved outcomes of ABO incompatible living donor liver transplant with biologically related donors.

Propensity Score-matched Donor and Recipient Outcomes: Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Donor Right Hepatectomy.

Few studies have examined the long-term outcomes of recipients in minimally invasive donor hepatectomies, particularly comparing robotic and laparoscopic donor procedures. Understanding these outcomes is crucial for optimizing surgical approaches and improving the overall success of living donor liver transplantation. This study aimed to compare the feasibility and safety of robotic donor right hepatectomy (RDRH) and laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (LDRH) by evaluating total follow-up patient outcomes. This retrospective, single-center study included 117 and 118 donors who underwent RDRH and LDRH between March 2016 and June 2023, respectively. After performing 1:1 propensity score matching, 71 donor-recipient pairs were included in each group. Donor and recipient complications were divided into early (within 90 d) and late (after 90 d) biliary and vascular complications. In the matched cohort, major complication rates of donors were similar in both groups. Bile duct (BD) variation was not significantly different; however, the rates of multiple BD openings (26.8% versus 54.9%; P = 0.001) and major biliary complications in recipients were higher in the LDRH group (22.5% versus 42.3%; P = 0.012). The cumulative biliary complication rate was significantly higher in the LDRH group. Early biliary complications were not significantly different; however, the rate of late biliary complications was higher in the LDRH group (11.3 versus 23.9%; P = 0.047). RDRH demonstrated comparable postoperative complications to LDRH in donors but showed fewer recipient biliary complications. This could be attributed to the precision of robotic dissection and BD division, resulting in fewer multiple BD openings.

Expanding Opportunities for Living Donation: Recommendations From the 2023 Santander Summit to Ensure Donor Protections, Informed Decision Making, and Equitable Access

A strategic vision toward global convergence in transplantation must encourage and remove barriers to living organ donation and transplantation. Here, we discuss deliberations of a working group of the 2023 Santander Summit charged with formulating recommendations for the safe expansion of living donor kidney transplantation and living donor liver transplantation worldwide. Living donor kidney transplantation has grown to be the preferred treatment for advanced kidney failure. Living donor liver transplantation emerged more recently as a strategy to reduce waitlist mortality, with adoption influenced by cultural factors, regional policies, clinical team experience, and the maturity of regional deceased donor transplant systems. Barriers to living donor transplantation span domains of education, infrastructure, risk assessment/risk communication, and financial burden to donors. Paired donor exchange is a growing option for overcoming incompatibilities to transplantation but is variably used across and within countries. Effectively expanding access to living donor transplantation requires multifaceted strategies, including improved education and outreach, and measures to enhance efficiency, transparency, and shared decision making in donor candidate evaluation. Efforts toward global dissemination and vigilant oversight of best practices and international standards for the assessment, informed consent, approval, and monitoring of living donors are needed. Fostering greater participation in paired exchange requires eliminating disincentives and logistical obstacles for transplant programs and patients, and establishing an ethical and legal framework grounded in World Health Organization Guiding Principles. Sharing of best practices from successful countries and programs to jurisdictions with emerging practices is vital to safely expand the practice of living donation worldwide and bring the field together globally.

Reply: Improved outcomes of ABO incompatible living donor liver transplant with biologically related donor.

Reply: Improved outcomes of ABO incompatible living donor liver transplant with biologically related donor.

Donors’ Outcome After Living Donor Liver Transplantation in a University Teaching Hospital: A Case Series

Donors’ Outcome After Living Donor Liver Transplantation in a University Teaching Hospital: A Case Series

Early relaparotomy in recipients after living donor liver transplantation: causes, risk factors, and consequences.

Despite advancements in surgical methodologies and the extensive perioperative and postoperative care administered to recipients, the prevalence of complications requiring early relaparotomy following living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) remains persistent. This study sought to analyze the determinants influencing relaparotomy occurrences in the initial 30 days following LDLT. Additionally, it was aimed to evaluate the impact of early laparotomy on both graft and patient survival within this distinct patient cohort. The study encompassed recipients (n = 535) aged 18 years and older who underwent primary LDLT at our institution from January 2019 to December 2021. Exclusion criteria involved patients necessitating early retransplantation. Early relaparotomy was specified as surgical intervention within the initial 30 days following LDLT. The study enrolled a total of 535 patients, among whom 85 (15.9%) underwent early relaparotomy. The median age of the patients was 54 (range: 41-60) years, with a predominant male representation (66.2%). Univariate analysis comparing the laparotomy and nonrelaparotomy groups revealed statistically significant differences in the creatinine (p = 0.043) and sodium (p = 0.025) levels, graft side (p < 0.001), etiology (p = 0.005), and blood loss (p = 0.012).In the multivariate analysis, creatinine (p = 0.039; OR = 1.668; 95% CI = 1.027-2.709) and left lobe graft (p < 0.0001; OR = 3.611; 95% CI = 1.960-6.652) emerged as independent risk factors for relaparotomy. The primary causes of early relaparotomy following LDLT include postoperative bleeding, biliary leakage, and vascular complications. Preoperative elevation in creatinine and sodium levels, the presence of Budd-Chiari syndrome, utilization of a left lobe graft, and intraoperative blood loss are identified as risk factors associated with early relaparotomy after LDLT. Patients undergoing early relaparotomy exhibit inferior survival rates compared to those who do not.

Early Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury in Living Donor Liver Transplantation by Serum Cystatin C Concentration at the End of the Surgery.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a prevalent complication of liver transplantation, leading to prolonged hospital or intensive care unit stay and significant morbidity. Recently, biomarkers such as neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and cystatin C have been investigated for their potential role in the early detection of AKI in liver transplantation patients. Our study comprised 60 patients with end-stage liver disease undergoing living donor liver transplantation. Based on the postoperative development of AKI, the patients were categorised into two groups: the AKI group comprising 22 patients and the non-AKI group comprising 38 patients. Serum cystatin C and urine NGAL levels were measured twice: immediately after induction of anaesthesia (baseline) and at the end of the surgery. The overall incidence of AKI was 36.66%. The mean cystatin C level measured at the end of the surgery was significantly higher in the AKI group (1.12 ± 0.40 mg/L) than in the non-AKI group (0.82 ± 0.27 mg/L) [P = .001]. The receiver operating characteristic curve for the postoperative cystatin C biomarker demonstrated a significant difference between the AKI and non-AKI groups [area under the curve: 0.71, P = .007]. However, baseline cystatin C and urine NGAL levels did not significantly differ between the groups. Cystatin C levels measured at the end of the surgery showed a better predictive value and higher accuracy in identifying post-liver transplantation patients with AKI than baseline cystatin C and urine NGAL.