Ligamentous Lisfranc Injuries Research Articles

Delayed Diagnosis of a Ligamentous Lisfranc Injury on a Bomber Task Force Member.

The tarsometatarsal joint, or Lisfranc joint, is an extremely important anatomical structure and injury to it has been shown to cause long-term disabling ramifications. With a wide spectrum of injury involvement, from fracture dislocations to sprains, it is important to establish a diagnosis early to guide management. Although the more extreme higher energy fracture dislocations are more widely studied, there remains a paucity of literature on lower energy purely ligamentous injuries, especially among military service members.1 The deployed setting provides an extra layer of complexity in determining a musculoskeletal injury etiology for the provider, especially in resource-limited areas. When a high level of suspicion for Lisfranc injury exists based upon clinical presentation and in the setting of negative X-rays, more prudence should be placed on additional workup. This will guide decision-making for possible expedited stateside return for the patient and better odds of follow-up care. The following case demonstrates a unique scenario of an undiagnosed, purely ligamentous Lisfranc tear in a 23-year-old woman in a deployed environment with late presentation to an orthopedic surgeon stateside. Furthermore, emphasis is placed on factors that led to her delayed diagnosis and how advocating for advanced imaging modalities up-front can expedite care.

The Use of Knotless Suture Tape Construct vs Screw Fixation for Lisfranc Injuries: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study.

Lisfranc injuries are often treated with open reduction and internal fixation using rigid fixation techniques. The use of flexible fixation to stabilize the Lisfranc joint is a newer technique. The purpose of this cadaveric study is to compare the amount of diastasis at the Lisfranc interval under diminished physiologic loads when treated with a knotless suture tape construct and a solid screw. Ten cadavers (20 feet) had native motion at the intact Lisfranc interval assessed at multiple increasing loads (69, 138, and 207 N). The Lisfranc ligamentous complex was then disrupted, and testing repeated to evaluate the amount of diastasis. Randomization was performed to determine the type of fixation for each cadaver: solid screw or knotless suture tape construct. Once fixation was completed, specimens were cyclically loaded for 10 000 cycles at loads, and diastasis was quantified after each load cycle to compare the interventions. Diastasis was measured using motion tracking cameras and retroreflective marker sets. A non-inferiority statistical analysis was performed. Diastasis mean values were confirmed to be >2 mm for all load bearing conditions in the injury model. Posttreatment, diastasis was significantly reduced when compared to the sectioned conditions (P < .01) for both treatment options. Non-inferiority analyses showed that the knotless suture tape construct did not perform inferior to screw fixation for diastasis at the Lisfranc interval at any of the compared load states. Under the loads tested, there is no significant difference in diastasis at the Lisfranc interval when treating ligamentous Lisfranc injuries with a knotless suture tape construct or solid screws. Both reduced diastasis from the injured state and were not different from the intact state. In this cadaveric model with ligamentous Lisfranc injury, diastasis of a knotless suture tape construct is compared to solid screw fixation as tested.

Outcomes of Lisfranc Injuries Treated with a New Flexible Fixation Technique: A Retrospective Case Series

Objectives Ligamentous Lisfranc injuries are devastating injuries that can lead to complications and difficulty returning to work and sports. Controversy exists over the preferred method of treatment for purely ligamentous injuries. The study aims to evaluate early postoperative complications and time to return to work/play in patients with ligamentous Lisfranc injuries who underwent ORIF using flexible fixation. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed on nine patients who underwent ORIF with flexible fixation using the InternalBrace (Arthrex Naples, FL) for ligamentous Lisfranc injuries. Patients were evaluated at 2- weeks, 6- weeks, and 12- weeks postoperatively with radiographs at 6- weeks, 12- weeks, and 24- weeks postoperatively. Results The average follow-up time was 6.6 months (SD = 5.1), the average time to unrestricted weight-bearing was 6.8 weeks (n=9), and the average time to return to work/sport as tolerated was 14.3 weeks (n=7). The only complication noted at the 2-week follow-up was hypersensitivity along the foot [1 (11%)], resolved by the 12-week follow-up. No radiographic hardware complications were noted at either 6-week or 12-week postoperative x-rays. Conclusions Flexible fixation using the InternalBrace (Arthrex, Naples, FL) is an effective procedure for patients with ligamentous Lisfranc injuries. The present study found no early postoperative complications, and the time to return to work/sport was comparable to other methods of ORIF reported in the literature.

Charcot neuroarthropathy in persons with diabetes: It's time for a paradigm shift in our thinking.

The aim of this paper is to review the recent literature regarding the epidemiology and surgical management of Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy (CNO). We propose that a fundamental change in the approach and assumptions regarding the historical treatment of active CNO should be considered. Although the true incidence and prevalence of CNO in the US population with diabetes are not known, we estimated the incidence to be 27,602 per year and the prevalence to be 208,880 persons. In persons with diabetes, the incidence of CNO is higher than that of prostate, lung, kidney, and thyroid cancer, and in the entire US population, the incidence of CNO is higher than that of multiple myeloma, soft tissue sarcoma, and primary bone sarcoma. In persons with diabetes, the incidence of CNO is higher than fractures of the femoral shaft, distal femur, tibia, talus, calcaneus and Lisfranc ligament injuries. Surgical techniques have evolved over the past half century, and surgery is the standard for treating displaced fractures and intra-articular injuries. Since CNO is a fracture, dislocation, or fracture dislocation in patients with neuropathy, why do we treat CNO differently? Elsewhere in the skeleton displaced osseous and ligament injuries are treated surgically. Based on the information presented in this manuscript, we suggest that it is time for a paradigm shift in the treatment of persons with CNO. While uncommon, CNO in persons with diabetes is not rare. Given the advances in surgical techniques, surgical intervention should be considered earlier in persons with CNO who are at risk for developing deformity related foot ulceration.

Intercuneiform Instability is Present in Midfoot Arthritis Patients: A 3D Volumetric Case-Control Assessment

Category: Midfoot/Forefoot; Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Lisfranc complex stability, primarily coming from the tarsometatarsal ligaments, is crucial for midfoot integrity. It has been shown that Lisfranc injuries can lead to midfoot issues, such as midfoot arthritis when not properly diagnosed/treated. Previous studies have estimated the volumes of the articulating joint volumes of surgically confirmed Lisfranc Ligament injuries, but no study has assessed articulating joints and space-of-interest of the Lisfranc Complex in patients with midfoot arthritis. The objective of this retrospective study was to determine if patients with confirmed midfoot arthritis have increased volumes at the Lisfranc complex when compared to controls, particularly between the first and second rays. We hypothesized that volumes would be increased in midfoot arthritis patients, consistent with medial column/first ray instability. Methods: In this IRB-approved, retrospective case-control study, we analyzed WBCT data of 20 consecutive midfoot arthritis patients and 20 healthy controls. Using an automated segmentation method (DISIOR Bonelogic 2.0, Paragon28, USA), 3D volumetric models of the bones of the foot were created from WBCT data. Opposing articular spaces in the Lisfranc joint of the midfoot were selected on the STL models of the bones. Interarticular distance mapping was then performed to characterize the joint space width (JSW) in each of the articulations. Interarticular volume was then estimated using an area-weighted volume measurement. Areas of each triangle from the triangulated surface were multiplied by the JSW at each triangle. The sum of individual volumes was then normalized by the total surface area. The final volume was estimated using the product of the normalized summation and average area of both surfaces. Comparisons were performed with independent t-tests. P-values &gt;0.05 were considered significant. Results: Estimates of joint volume were obtained using the automated method written in MATLAB. These outputs are reported in Table 1. Significant increase of approximately 25% was observed in Midfoot arthritis patients at the 1-2 intercuneiform joint, consistent with intercuneiform instability. Conversely, a decrease in the space between the second metatarsal and medial cuneiform of about 30% was observed, what could be explained by pronation of the first ray secondary to first ray instability. All other changes in joint volumes were not significant (Figure). Conclusion: In this case-control study with midfoot arthritis patients and healthy controls we performed a 3D volumetric assessment of the Lisfranc Complex joints and spaces-of-interest. We found that midfoot arthritis patients have a significant increase in the 1-2 intercuneiform joint consistent with intercuneiform instability. Conversely, a decrease in the Lisfranc space (in between second metatarsal and medial cuneiform) was observed, what could be explained by first ray pronation in the setting of medial column instability. Additional prospective studies assessing angular measurements and patient reported outcomes are needed.

Outcomes of Surgically Treated Purely Ligamentous Stage II Lisfranc Injuries.

Low-energy stage II Lisfranc injuries are rare, and treatment can be operative or nonoperative based on a surgeon's assessment of midfoot stability. No previously published patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) data for Lisfranc injuries isolates purely ligamentous stage II injuries. The purpose of this study was to analyze PROMs for patients who underwent operative management of stage II Lisfranc injuries. Thirty-nine patients (39 feet) with confirmed Nunley-Vertullo stage II Lisfranc injuries between May 2012 and February 2022 were identified through a retrospective chart review. PROMs that were analyzed were the visual analog scale (VAS) pain scale, Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12), Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), and patient satisfaction. Thirty-two open reduction internal fixations (ORIFs) and 7 fusions were performed. The mean latest follow-up was 44.6 (range, 12-92) months. There were 2 complications (5%, 2/39) that required a revision procedure. Twenty-six patients (67%, 26/39) underwent secondary surgery to remove retained hardware. The mean time to hardware removal was 3.97 (range, 2.70-7.47) months. The overall mean patient satisfaction score with overall medical care including clinical visits and interactions with medical staff personnel was 93.6/100. All PROMs (VAS, VR-12, FAAM) demonstrated statistically significant improvement (P < .05) from preoperative (injury) values to latest follow-up postinjury values. Patients who were treated surgically with stage II purely ligamentous Lisfranc injuries via the methods used were found to mostly undergo hardware removal and have high levels of overall satisfaction with their process of medical care. Level IV, retrospective case series.

Clinical and Biomechanical Outcomes of Suture Button Fixation for Ligamentous Lisfranc Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Flexible ligamentous fixation has increased in popularity for the treatment of ligamentous Lisfranc injury, but the optimal fixation strategy is unclear. To review the biomechanical, clinical, and radiographic results of ligamentous Lisfranc injuries treated with flexible fixation. Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. A systematic literature review was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The PubMed/Medline and Google Scholar literature databases were queried for clinical and biomechanical (cadaveric) studies relating to flexible fixation of ligamentous Lisfranc injury. Outcomes of interest included patient-reported outcome scores, clinical/biomechanical results, radiographic alignment, and return to activity. Where appropriate, meta-analysis of the postoperative outcomes was performed. Of the 34 initial studies, 14 articles (243 feet) were included in the analysis. In the 11 clinical studies (216 patients), the mean postoperative American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society score was 90.1 (n = 150; 6 studies) and the mean visual analog scale score was 1.5 (n = 137; 5 studies). The rate of return to activity was 100% (n = 35; 5 studies), and 100% of patients maintained radiographic alignment postoperatively (n = 62; 6 studies). No complications or subsequent hardware removals were reported. Of the 3 biomechanical studies (27 feet), 1 study found significantly greater change in diastasis under axial load between intact and postfixation ligaments with suture button versus screw fixation (+1.1 vs -0.1 mm; P < .05), another found no difference in the decrease in diastasis under axial load between the injured state and screw or suture button fixation (1.2 vs 1.0 mm; P = .5), and the third found no difference in displacement between intact and either screw or suture button fixation under either axial (intact vs screw: 1.0 vs 2.0 mm, P = .1; intact vs suture button: 0.6 vs 1.8 mm, P = .1) or abduction (intact vs screw: 1.5 vs 1.1 mm, P = .5; intact vs suture button: 1.3 vs 2.1 mm, P = .1) load. Flexible fixation use in the treatment of ligamentous Lisfranc injury was found to have significant potential as a fixation option, as demonstrated by excellent clinical results. Biomechanical evidence was inconclusive but suggested a trend toward decreased diastasis in specimens fixed with screws compared with suture buttons.

Simulated Weightbearing and Articular Injury From Transarticular Screws in a Ligamentous Lisfranc Injury Model.

Transarticular screw fixation is a common surgical treatment for tarsometatarsal ligamentous (Lisfranc) injuries. Iatrogenic damage to articular cartilage from screw placement, however, has been thought to potentially lead to increased risk of tarsometatarsal (TMT) joint arthritis after initial injury. To date, no study has evaluated the effect of weightbearing on articular cartilage after screw fixation. The aim of this study was to create a Lisfranc injury and quantify and compare articular damage due to screw fixation before and after simulated weightbearing. A ligamentous Lisfranc injury was created in 10 cadaveric specimens and treated with transarticular screws. Specimens were cycled for 1000 cycles at 250 N to simulate 2 weeks of physiologic weightbearing. Rotation and diastasis across the Lisfranc complex were measured. Articular injury as a percentage of total articular surface was measured using digital imaging of the first and second TMT joint before and after simulated weightbearing. Comparisons between articular damage were made and statistical analysis was performed. Simulated partial weightbearing increased articular injury 1.44-fold (P < .001). The second metatarsal (M2) showed the greatest increase (1.54-fold, P = .0047), whereas the first (M1) showed the least (1.35-fold, P = .0083). Increases seen at the medial (1.43-fold, P = .0387) and middle cuneiform (1.44-fold, P = .0292) were intermediate between the values seen at M2 and M1. Articular damage from transarticular screw fixation significantly increased after simulated partial weightbearing. This may increase the risk of arthritis and future morbidity when using transarticular screws for the treatment of ligamentous Lisfranc injuries. Iatrogenic damage to articular cartilage due to screw fixation of ligamentous Lisfranc injuries may be increased with weightbearing.

Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Purely Ligamentous Lisfranc Injury in a Rugby Player: A Case Report

Objective: Lisfranc injuries are found in various injury patterns, especially in athletes. These injuries are the second most common type of foot injuries in athletes. However, the treatment decision differs and is essential in athletes for a good outcome. The main controversies in surgical management include whether to execute open or close reduction, fixation technique, and arthrodesis’ role in athletes. Case Report: A previously healthy 21 Years Old Malay gentleman sustained a sports injury diagnosed with pure ligamentous Lisfranc injury with an incomplete, partial lateral dislocation. The patient was treated with Open Reduction and Internal Fixation (ORIF) using a dorsal bridge Lisfranc locking plate. Conclusion: Early diagnosis and appropriate treatment are crucial to achieving stability in unstable Lisfranc injuries. Anatomical reduction and Lisfranc joint restoration are the keys to a good outcome. Open reduction and internal fixation are preferred methods where most athletes can return to their previous level of sports.

Various Flexible Fixation Techniques Using Suture Button for Ligamentous Lisfranc Injuries: A Review of Surgical Options.

Contrary to Lisfranc joint fracture-dislocation, ligamentous Lisfranc injury can lead to additional instability and arthritis and is difficult to diagnose. Appropriate procedure selection is necessary for a better prognosis. Several surgical methods have recently been introduced. Here, we present three distinct surgical techniques for treating ligamentous Lisfranc employing flexible fixation. First is the "Single Tightrope procedure", which involves reduction and fixation between the second metatarsal base and the medial cuneiform via making a bone tunnel and inserting Tightrope. Second is the "Dual Tightrope Technique", which is similar to the "Single Tightrope technique", with additional fixation of an intercuneiform joint using one MiniLok Quick Anchor Plus. Last but not least, the "internal brace approach" uses the SwiveLock anchor, particularly when intercueniform instability is seen. Each approach has its own advantages and disadvantages in terms of surgical complexity and stability. These flexible fixation methods, on the other hand, are more physiologic and have the potential to lessen the difficulties that have been linked to the use of conventional screws in the past.

A Rare Case of a Lisfranc Ligament Transection.

Ligamentous Lisfranc injuries, which mimic a surgical transection are rare. Left untreated or missed, these injuries may result in severe complications including long-term disability. The present case describes a unique mechanism of injury via a sharp object puncture through the plantar surface of the midfoot. It highlights the utility of planning staged procedures to remove a large foreign body object, reports notable intraoperative techniques, and provides a decision management guide for treating this type of injury. Extensive surgical planning may be required when encountering similar cases and knowledge of this may be useful to providers.

Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Fixation of Lisfranc Injury Using Suspensory Fixation.

This closed reduction and percutaneous fixation (CRPF) technique utilizing suspensory fixation is indicated for the treatment of Lisfranc injuries with displacement or instability of the tarsometatarsal joint complex-and typically only for low-energy, purely ligamentous Lisfranc injuries. The goal of this procedure is to restore joint stability and prevent common complications of Lisfranc injuries (e.g., midfoot arch collapse and posttraumatic arthritis) while avoiding the complications and risks associated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and primary arthrodesis. We recommend performing the procedure within 10 to 14 days of the injury; otherwise, an open debridement may be necessary to address scar tissue formation. We start with the patient in the supine position and perform a fluoroscopic stress examination of the joint. Next, the Lisfranc joint undergoes closed reduction, which is held in place with a clamp. Following reduction, a guidewire is drilled from the lateral border of the base of the 2nd metatarsal medially through the medial cuneiform, followed by a medial-to-lateral cannulated drill. The suspensory fixation is then passed lateral-to-medial, placing the suture button on the lateral cortex of the 2nd metatarsal base. The tape is then tensioned while a bioabsorbable interference screw is inserted to maintain tension. Prior studies have assessed both operative and nonoperative alternatives to CRPF with suspensory fixation for the treatment of Lisfranc injuries. Nonoperative treatment with closed reduction and cast immobilization of Lisfranc injuries is typically reserved for nondisplaced injuries; however, a number of studies have shown poor outcomes with use of this technique1-3. The 2 most common operative alternatives are ORIF and primary arthrodesis4. CRPF with suspensory fixation offers several benefits over both traditional surgical techniques such as ORIF and primary arthrodesis, as well as over percutaneous reduction and internal fixation (PRIF) with a screw. Compared with ORIF and primary arthrodesis, a number of studies have shown that percutaneous treatment of Lisfranc injuries minimizes soft-tissue trauma and reduces the risk of postoperative complications such as wound breakdown, infection, and complex regional pain syndrome, while allowing for earlier participation in rehabilitation5-10. A systematic review of outcomes following PRIF with screw fixation also showed that percutaneous treatment of Lisfranc injuries is a safe and effective technique with good functional outcomes11. When comparing PRIF with a screw to our technique of CRPF with suspensory fixation, CRPF has the added benefit of creating a nonrigid fixation in the Lisfranc joint, which allows for increased range of motion of the medial column and improved return to activity12,13. The rigid fixation in PRIF with a screw can also lead to metal irritation, intra-articular screw fracture, and impaired mobility, which often necessitate the need for screw removal13-15. This fixation-related drawback is not present with our technique, and also avoids the need for use of a biologic substitute such as tendon grafts13. Following CRPF with suspensory fixation, patients can expect to return to full activity at 12 to 16 weeks postoperatively. Postoperatively, patients are typically kept non-weight-bearing for 6 weeks. The operative foot is kept immobilized in a splint for the first 2 weeks, then transitioned to a boot. Between postoperative weeks 6 and 12, partial progressive weight-bearing is introduced with use of an arch support, progressing toward full weight-bearing13,16,17.For comparison, patients who underwent PRIF with screw fixation had a similar postoperative course, but almost all required screw removal at 4 to 6 months postoperatively13,16. Cho et al. retrospectively reviewed the results of 63 patients who underwent either PRIF with screw fixation (n = 32) or CRPF with a suture button (n = 31) and found that CRPF patients had significantly better American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society midfoot scale scores (81 versus 74 points) and visual analog scale scores (3.1 versus 4.6 points) at 6 months postoperatively and prior to screw removal in the PRIF group (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in these scores, radiographic outcomes, weight-bearing analysis, or complications at 1 year postoperatively. The authors concluded that both techniques provided comparable fixation stability and clinical outcomes. Of note, however, the PRIF group had 4 patients whose postoperative course was complicated by screw breakage13. Start with a fluoroscopic stress examination to identify all components of instability.Ensure that the reduction clamp does not interfere with or affect your guidewire path.If the joint cannot be reduced, convert to an open procedure and debride the obstruction. ORIF = open reduction and internal fixationPRIF = percutaneous reduction and internal fixationCRPF = closed reduction and percutaneous fixationNSAID = nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugOR = operating roomAP = anteroposteriorCT = computed tomographyMRI = magnetic resonance imagingAOFAS = American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle SocietyVAS = visual analog scaleROM = range of motionPT = physical therapyASA = acetyl-salicylic acid (aspirin)BID = twice dailyPRN = as needed.

Comparison of flexible fixation and screw fixation for isolated Lisfranc ligament injuries: A protocol for a meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Background:The frequency of isolated Lisfranc ligament (ILL) injuries has been increasing recently with the increase in low-energy trauma resulting from sports injuries. For ILL injuries, the optimal method of fixation still remains controversial. The traditional fixation method is achieved by trans-articular screws, but recently, dorsal bridge plates and suture button (SB) fixation have become alternatives. Some biomechanical studies have showed that SB fixation can provide adequate strength compared to trans-articular screws. Therefore, a meta-analysis is imperative to provide evidence on whether flexible fixation is comparable to screw fixation for treatment of ILL injuries.Methods:We will conduct a comprehensive literature search in PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and Web of Science databases and for comparative studies. We will apply the risk-of-bias tool of the Cochrane Collaboration for Randomized Controlled Trials to assess the methodological quality. Risk-of-Bias Assessment Tool for Non-randomized Studies was used to evaluate the quality of comparative studies. Statistical analysis will be conducted using RevMan 5.4 software (Cochrane Collaboration, London, England).Results:This systematic review will evaluate the functional outcomes and radiographic results of flexible fixation for treatment of ILL injuries.Conclusion:The conclusion of this study will provide evidence for judging whether flexible fixation is superior to screw fixation for treatment of ILL injuries.

CT and Functional Outcomes of Primarily Ligamentous and Combined Ligamentous-Bony Lisfranc Injuries: A Retrospective Review

Lisfranc injuries have been rising in incidence and can cause significant and lasting morbidity. There is no consensus on the optimal surgical treatment for these injuries, be they primarily ligamentous or combined (bony and ligamentous). No study has ever followed Lisfranc injury patients postoperatively using advanced imaging. The purpose of this study was to compare the functional and radiographic outcomes of primarily ligamentous and combined osseous and ligamentous Lisfranc injuries treated operatively with reduction and fixation. We performed a retrospective review of all Lisfranc injuries treated operatively in a single institution over a 6-year period. Injuries were classified as primarily ligamentous or combined by independent evaluation of available computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging. Outcomes were measured using the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA). CT of 29 patients was performed at last follow-up to evaluate reduction and degenerative changes. Of the 56 patients identified, 38 were available for follow-up. The average follow-up was 3.8 years. There were 26 combined injuries and 12 primarily ligamentous injuries. Outcomes were excellent in all patients and there was no statistical difference in SMFA scores in any category between the groups. On follow-up CT, all injuries were anatomically reduced, and 26 of 29 patients had degenerative changes. Our results support that reduction and stable fixation of Lisfranc injuries may be suitable treatment regardless of classification as combined or primarily ligamentous. Future larger-scale prospective studies should be pursued to supplement existing data.

Biomechanical Comparison of Fiber Tape Device Versus Transarticular Screws for Ligamentous Lisfranc Injury in a Cadaveric Model

Background: The preferred method of fixation and surgical treatment for ligamentous Lisfranc injuries is controversial. Transarticular screws, bridge plating, fusion, and flexible fixation have been described, yet none have demonstrated superiority. Furthermore, screw fixation and plating often require secondary surgery to remove implants, leading surgeons to seek alternative fixation methods. Purpose: To compare transarticular screws and a fiber tape construct under a spectrum of biomechanical loads by evaluating the diastasis at 3 joints in the Lisfranc complex. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Eight matched pairs of fresh, previously frozen lower extremity cadaveric specimens were fixed with either 2 cannulated transarticular crossed screws or a fiber tape construct with a supplemental intercuneiform limb. The diastasis between bones was measured at 3 midfoot joints in the Lisfranc complex: the Lisfranc articulation, the second tarsometatarsal joint, and the intercuneiform joint. Measurements were obtained for the preinjured, injured, and fixation conditions under static loading at 50% donor body weight. Specimens then underwent cyclic loading performed at 1 Hz and 100 cycles, based on 100-N stepwise increases in ground-reaction force from 100 to 2000 N, to simulate postoperative loading from the partial weightbearing stage to high-energy activities. Failure of fixation was defined as diastasis ≥2 mm at the Lisfranc articulation (second metatarsal–medial cuneiform joint). Results: There were no significant differences in diastasis detected at the Lisfranc articulation or the intercuneiform joint throughout all loading cycles between groups. All specimens endured loading up to 50% body weight + 1400 N. Up to and including this stage, there were 2 failures in the cannulated transarticular crossed-screw group and none in the fiber tape group. Conclusion: The fiber tape construct with a supplemental intercuneiform limb, which does not require later removal, may provide comparable biomechanical stability to cannulated transarticular crossed screws, even at higher loads. Clinical Relevance: Ligamentous Lisfranc injuries are common among athletes. Therefore, biomechanical evaluations are necessary to determine stable constructs that can limit the time to return to play. This study compares the biomechanical stability of 2 methods of fixation for ligamentous injury through a wide spectrum of loading, including those experienced by athletes.

Shortening the Return-to-Play Times in Elite Athletes With Unstable Isolated Lisfranc Ligament Injuries Using a Knotless Interosseous Suture Button: Case Series and Literature Review.

Background:Isolated unstable Lisfranc ligament injuries in elite athletes are associated with a lengthy period of rehabilitation and prolonged absence from competition.Purpose:To assess the efficacy of a knotless, interosseous suture button system for repairing isolated unstable ligamentous Lisfranc injuries and its capacity to allow accelerated rehabilitation with earlier weightbearing and return-to-play times in elite athletes.Study Design:Case series; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:The authors retrospectively reviewed data from a prospectively compiled database for elite athletes treated by a single surgeon. All included patients had clinical and magnetic resonance imaging evidence of an unstable isolated complete ligamentous Lisfranc injury requiring surgical reduction and stabilization. All patients underwent surgery using a knotless interosseous suture button to achieve stabilization, followed by a standardized postoperative regimen involving full weightbearing at 4 weeks, and all had a minimum postoperative follow-up of 2 years.Results:Included were 12 patients: 7 National Rugby League (NRL) players, 2 professional dancers, 1 Olympic gymnast, 1 professional wakeboarder, and 1 professional NRL referee. The mean age of the patients was 21.1 years (range, 16-34 years). Ten patients underwent acute surgical stabilization within 3 weeks of the injury, and 2 patients sustained chronic isolated Lisfranc instability that was initially treated nonoperatively. All athletes were able to return to full weightbearing by 4 weeks postoperatively, successfully returned to training by 9 to 12 weeks, and returned to full competition by 12 to 16 weeks. No major complications were reported.Conclusion:Knotless interosseous suture button stabilization was a reliable treatment option for both acute and chronic isolated ligamentous Lisfranc injuries in these elite athletes. This technique does not require hardware removal, allows early weightbearing with accelerated rehabilitation, and may shorten the return-to-play interval.

Biomechanical Comparison of Fibertape Device vs Cannulated Screw for Ligamentous Lisfranc Injury in a Cadaveric Model

Category:Midfoot/Forefoot; SportsIntroduction/Purpose:The preferred method of fixation for ligamentous Lisfranc injuries is controversial, with the traditional method being transarticular screws. Unfortunately, screw removal is often required leading surgeons to seek alternative fixation methods including fibertape constructs. The purpose of this biomechanical study is to compare transarticular screws to a fibertape construct under a spectrum of biomechanical loads. This controlled laboratory study involved evaluating the diastasis at three joints in the Lisfranc complex in matched pairs and creating 3D models for each loading stage to evaluate at the plantar, interosseous, and dorsal aspects of each bone.Methods:Eight matched pairs of lower extremity cadaveric specimens were fixed with either a fibertape construct with a supplemental intercuneiform limb, or two transarticular cannulated crossed-screws. The diastasis between bones was measured at three midfoot joints in the Lisfranc complex; the Lisfranc articulation, the 2nd tarsometatarsal joint, and the intercuneiform joint using a 3D coordinate digitizer. Measurements were obtained for the pre-injured, injured, and fixation under static loading at 50% donor bodyweight. Specimens then underwent stepwise increases in cyclic loading performed at 1 Hz and 100 cycles, at additional 100 N ground reaction force intervals from 100 N to 2000 N to simulate postoperative loading from the partial weightbearing stage to high-energy activities. CT scans were obtained for each specimen to create 3D models that allowed for plantar and interosseous diastasis measurements. Failure of fixation was defined as diastasis greater than 2 millimeters at the Lisfranc articulation (second-metatarsal - medial-cuneiform joint).Results:There were no significant differences detected between groups in the pre-injury, injury or fixation stage and therefore no notable differences between groups prior to surgery with different constructs. Specimens fixed with the fibertape construct demonstrated failure in 1 of 8 (12.5%) specimens during a cycle with a peak force of 2000 N. In contrast, 2 of 8 (25%) specimens fixed with screws failed at peak forces of 1000 N and 1400 N. There were no significant differences in diastasis detected at the Lisfranc articulation or the intercuneiform joint throughout all loading cycles. However, the fibertape construct showed higher non-failure in statistical predictions, and significantly less motion at the adjacent 2nd tarsometatarsal joint.Conclusion:This study displayed a high level of repeatability in our injury creation under fluoroscopy with a specific criteria to avoid disrupting any adjacent ligaments and a threshold measurement of injury. The fibertape construct with a supplemental intercuneiform limb seems to provide comparable biomechanical stability to transarticular screws. There were no significant differences detected throughout our loading protocol which exceeds loads performed in previous studies. Furthermore, in combination with not requiring removal, this construct may allow for physiologic loading potentially providing accelerated post- operative protocols.

Computational analysis of Lisfranc surgical repairs.

Ligamentous Lisfranc injuries cause debilitating pain and loss of function. Even small diastasis of this normally rigid joint after injury requires surgical treatment, but outcomes remain poor. Existing literature has compared the different surgical procedures using cadaveric models, but no approach has been recommended over others. This study uses a computational biomechanical approach consistent with a cadaveric study to evaluate the different procedures' ability to stabilize the Lisfranc joint without inducing secondary consequences. A validated rigid body model for the cadaver foot with a Lisfranc injury was extended to compare the stability of four different surgical repairs-three open reduction and internal fixation procedures with different hardware (cannulated screws, endobuttons, and screws with a dorsal plate) and primary arthrodesis with screws. Forces calculated from the rigid body model for 50% partial weight bearing provided boundary conditions for a finite element model of the surgical repairs. Comparing the different surgical procedures, the open reduction and internal fixation with screws and primary arthrodesis with screws showed the most stable postoperative Lisfranc joint. However, the use of cannulated screws for fixation showed regions of high stress that may be susceptible to breakage and also resulted in higher contact forces in joints adjacent to the surgery site. Endobuttons and dorsal plates did not restore sufficient stability. Since all procedures showed different points of concern that could impact outcomes, additional surgical approaches could be needed in the future. This study offers a standard protocol for benchmarking the new procedures against those currently used.

Lisfranc injury: Refined diagnostic methodology using weightbearing and non-weightbearing radiographs

BackgroundTo compare diagnostic parameters for Lisfranc instability on WB and NWB radiographs and to assess the inter-observer reliability of a standardized diagnostic protocol. Patients and methodsPatients who had undergone surgical treatment for subtle, purely ligamentous Lisfranc injury with both WB and NWB post-injury, pre-surgery films (n = 26) were included in this multicentre, retrospective comparative study. Also included was a control group (n = 26) of patients with isolated fifth metatarsal avulsion fractures who similarly had both WB and NWB films. Multiple midfoot distance and alignment measurements were used to evaluate the Lisfranc joint on both WB and NWB views. To evaluate interobserver reliability, measurements were made by two independent observers across a cohort subset. ResultsWhen comparing the NWB views between groups, only C1M2 (medial cuneiform- second metatarsal) distance was found to be significantly larger (∆ = 1.35 mm, p <0.001) for Lisfranc injuries. Most notably, C2M2 (Intermediate cuneiform – second metatarsal) step off—caused by lateral translation of the second metatarsal base—was not significantly different (∆ = 0.39 mm, p = 0.101) between Lisfranc patients and controls. On WB views, Lisfranc patients had significantly larger changes to C1M2 distance and C2M2 step-off as compared to controls (∆ = 2.97 mm, p <0.001 and ∆ = 1.98 mm, p <0.001 respectively). M1M2 (first to second intermetatarsal) distance was not significantly different between patients and controls in WB films. Within the cohort of ligamentous Lisfranc patients, C1M2 distance and C2M2 step-off were significantly larger in WB when compared to NWB films (∆ = 1.77 mm, p <0.001 and ∆ = 1.58 mm, p <0.001 respectively). For these parameters, inter-observer reliability scores (ICC) of >0. 90 were found when interpreting WB radiographs and ICC's ranging between 0.61 and 0.80 were found when interpreting NWB radiographs. ConclusionUsing WB imaging for diagnosing subtle Lisfranc instability reveals larger diastasis in the tarsometatarsal joint and has a higher interobserver reliability compared to NWB imaging. Clinical concern for subtle or occult Lisfranc instability in any patient should therefore trigger WB radiographic assessment since such injuries may be missed on NWB views.

Flexible Fixation Technique for Subtle Lisfranc Injuries

Background: Subtle Lisfranc injuries represent a primarily ligamentous Lisfranc complex injury involving the Lisfranc ligament and the medial and middle cuneiform ligaments. Static radiographic displacement or dynamic instability of the medial cuneiform and 2nd metatarsal typically warrants operative intervention to prevent chronic functional pain, allow for timely return-to-sport, and mitigate posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Flexible fixation techniques offer a unique solution to the issues seen with transarticular screws, plates, and arthrodesis for ligamentous Lisfranc injuries. Indications: We present the case of a 16-year-old female basketball player with a subtle Lisfranc injury sustained during practice. X-rays show isolated widening of the 1st and 2nd metatarsal bases and dynamic diastasis between the medial and middle cuneiforms. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed a rupture of the plantar Lisfranc ligament. After extensive discussion regarding treatment options, the patient and her family decided to proceed with surgical intervention using a suture anchor and button technique to restore stability to the Lisfranc ligament and intercuneiform complexes. Technique Description: A standardized dynamic examination under anesthesia identifies the extent of the injury. Exposure of the base of the 2nd metatarsal and medial cuneiform is performed. Reduction clamps are applied to restore the intercuneiform relationship and interval between the medial cuneiform and base of 2nd metatarsal. The suture anchor and button construct is placed using fluoroscopic guidance. A final dynamic examination is performed to confirm stability of the construct. Results: Biomechanical studies have shown that flexible fixation maintains physiologic motion about the Lisfranc articulations and has comparable stability to transarticular screws in cadaveric models of isolated Lisfranc ligament insufficiency. Clinical results are limited but demonstrate excellent postoperative functional outcome scores with very few fixation-related complications at 1 to 3 years. Discussion: Flexible fixation techniques for subtle Lisfranc injuries offer unique benefits to transarticular screws, plates, and arthrodesis. We highlight the appropriate evaluation of patients with a suspected subtle ligamentous Lisfranc injury, the surgical technique using a suture button and anchor construct, and review postoperative management and expected outcomes based on the present literature.