Lipoprotein Subclasses In Patients Research Articles

Profile of Lipoprotein Subclasses in Chinese Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Patients.

To investigate the plasma lipoprotein subclasses in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), a total of 20 Chinese POAG patients on intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering treatment and 20 age-matched control subjects were recruited. Based on the levels of total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), the study subjects were divided into elevated- and normal-level subgroups. The plasma lipoprotein, lipoprotein subclasses, and oxidized LDL (oxLDL) levels were quantitatively measured. The discrimination potential of the lipoproteins was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and their correlation with clinical parameters was also evaluated. Compared to the control subjects with elevated TC and/or LDL-C levels, the levels of TC, LDL-C, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL), LDL subclass LDL3 and small dense LDL (sdLDL), and oxLDL were significantly higher in POAG patients with elevated TC and/or LDL-C levels. No differences in any lipoproteins or the subclasses were found between the POAG patients and control subjects with normal TC and LDL-C levels. Moderate-to-good performance of TC, LDL-C, non-HDL, LDL3, sdLDL, and oxLDL was found in discriminating between the POAG patients and control subjects with elevated TC and/or LDL-C levels (AUC: 0.710-0.950). Significant negative correlations between LDL3 and sdLDL with retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in the superior quadrant and between LDL3 and average RNFL thickness were observed in POAG patients with elevated TC and/or LDL-C levels. This study revealed a significant elevation of plasma lipoproteins, especially the LDL subclasses, in POAG patients with elevated TC and/or LDL-C levels, providing insights on monitoring specific lipoproteins in POAG patients with elevated TC and/or LDL-C.

Influence of CETP on High-Density Lipoprotein Subclasses in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease.

Inhibition of plasma cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) can effectively reduce the risk of ath-erosclerotic cardiovascular disease by increasing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels, but the effect of CETP on the distributions of HDL subclasses in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) is still elusive. To investigate the correlation between the level of CETP and the distributions of HDL subclasses, 121 healthy controls and 139 patients with CHD were selected as study subjects. The plasma levels of CETP and each HDL subclass were respectively determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and two-dimensional gel electrophoresis associated with the immunodetection method. At the same time, blood biochemical data from all subjects were collected, including the levels of triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), HDL-C, apoA1, and apoB100. Correlation analysis and multiple regression analysis among the plasma HDL subclass values and biochemical parameters in subjects with CHD were conducted. As the plasma level of CETP increases, the contents of TC, TG, and apoB100/A1 were obviously elevated, while the levels of HDL-C and apoA1 decreased significantly. For distributions of HDL subclasses, large-sized HDL2a and HDL2b were markedly decreased in the middle CETP group (p < 0.05) and the high CETP group (p < 0.001) compared to the low CETP group, while the small-sized preβ1-HDL was obviously increased. Intriguingly, when the plasma concentration of TC or TG in patients with CHD was higher, the elevated preβ1-HDL and reduced HDL2a were more dependent on the increase in CETP. Furthermore, correlation analysis and multiple regression analysis also confirmed that plasma CETP was positively correlated with preβ1-HDL levels and negatively correlated with HDL2b levels. The distributions of HDL subclasses were associated with CETP in patients with CHD, especially in those with high levels of TC and TG. CETP levels were associated with an increase in small-sized preβ1-HDL and a decrease in large-sized HDL subclasses, which indicated that CETP might be a limiter of reverse cholesterol transport and HDL maturation.

Dissimilar Effects of Anagliptin and Sitagliptin on Lipoprotein Subclass in Standard or Strong Statin-Treated Patients with Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Subanalysis of the REASON (Randomized Evaluation of Anagliptin versus Sitagliptin on Low-Density LipoproteiN Cholesterol in Diabetes) Trial.

The effects of antidiabetic agents on lipoprotein subclasses are assumed to be pivotal, but this assumption has not been studied. We evaluated lipoprotein subclasses in patients, randomly selected from REASON (Randomized Evaluation of Anagliptin versus Sitagliptin On low-density lipoproteiN cholesterol in diabetes) Trial participants, with type-2 diabetes treated with either anagliptin or sitagliptin. We measured total cholesterol (TC) and triglycerides (TG) in 4 (chylomicron (CM), very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL), low density lipoprotein (LDL), and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)) lipoprotein classes and 20 (2 CM, 5 VLDL, 6 LDL, and 7 HDL) lipoprotein subclasses. Between 0 and 52 weeks, TC and TG in lipoprotein and the lipoprotein subclass were distributed differently in patients treated with anagliptin and sitagliptin. The preferable changes in TC and TG levels were observed dominantly in the anagliptin-treated group under standard statin therapy, but the benefits were observed in both the anagliptin- and sitagliptin-treated groups, at least partially under strong statin therapy. In future studies, the atherogenic properties of lipoprotein subclasses might be considered when employing antidiabetic dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, especially in patients with type-2 diabetes who are at risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or are undergoing statin treatment.

The effect of metformin on the lipoprotein profile and lipoprotein particle size in the carotid atherosclerosis: Metformin for insulin resistance (camera) trial

Aim: Metformin, the most widely used treatment for type 2 diabetes (T2DM), has been shown to reduce total-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and triglyceride levels though this relationship has typically been studied in patients with T2DM not on statin therapy. Metformin is currently being investigated for potential cardiovascular benefit in patients without T2DM. We investigated whether metformin changes the profile of lipoprotein subclasses in patients already on statin therapy.

Distribution of Low-Density Lipoprotein and High-Density Lipoprotein Subclasses in Patients With Sarcoidosis

Systemic inflammatory diseases are associated with proatherogenic lipoprotein profile, but there is a lack of information regarding overall distributions of lipoprotein subclasses in sarcoidosis. To investigate whether patients with sarcoidosis have altered distributions of plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) particles. Seventy-seven patients with biopsy-proven sarcoidosis (29 with acute and 48 with chronic sarcoidosis) treated with corticosteroids and 77 age- and sex-matched controls were included in the study. Low-density lipoprotein and HDL subclasses were determined by gradient gel electrophoresis, while inflammatory markers and lipid parameters were measured by standard laboratory methods. Compared to controls, patients had fewer LDL I subclasses (P < .001), but more LDL II and III (P < .001) subclasses. This pattern was evident in both acute and chronic disease groups. Patients also had smaller HDL size (P < .001) and higher proportions of HDL 2a (P = .006) and 3a particles (P = .004). Patients with chronic sarcoidosis had smaller LDL size than those with acute disease (P = .02) and higher proportions of HDL 3a subclasses (P = .04) than controls. In acute sarcoidosis, relative proportions of LDL and HDL particles were associated with levels of inflammatory markers, whereas in chronic disease an association with concentrations of serum lipid parameters was found. The obtained results demonstrate adverse lipoprotein subfraction profile in sarcoidosis with sustained alterations during disease course. Evaluation of LDL and HDL particles may be helpful in identifying patients with higher cardiovascular risk, at least for prolonged corticosteroid therapy due to chronic disease course.

Evaluation of Low-Density Lipoprotein Particle Number Distribution in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

Many patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have relatively normal levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol yet have increased risk for cardiovascular events. Distribution of lipoprotein subclasses in patients with T2DM who have achieved very low levels of LDL cholesterol (<50 mg/dl) or non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (<80 mg/dl) have not been extensively examined. The aim of this study was to assess variations in lipoprotein particle concentration in patients with diabetes with "very low" LDL cholesterol and non-HDL cholesterol levels to elucidate the drivers of residual cardiovascular risk. Data were selected from a single large clinical laboratory database. Cases were patients with T2DM diagnosis codes (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, codes 250 to 250.93). Lipoprotein particle concentrations were analyzed using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The Friedewald equation was used to calculate LDL cholesterol. Among the 1,970 patients with T2DM, the mean age was 61 years, and approximately 51% were men. At LDL cholesterol concentrations <50 mg/dl (triglyceride <150 mg/dl and HDL cholesterol >40 mg/dl), 16% had LDL particle concentrations <500 nmol/L, 70% had concentrations of 500 to 1,000 nmol/L, and 14% had concentrations >1,001 nmol/L. At non-HDL cholesterol levels <80 mg/dl, 8% had LDL particle concentrations <500 nmol/L, 67% had concentrations of 500 to 1,000 nmol/L, and 25% had concentrations >1,001 nmol/L. In conclusion, despite attainment of LDL cholesterol <50 mg/dl or non-HDL cholesterol <80 mg/dl, patients with diabetes exhibited significant variation in LDL particle levels, with most having LDL particle concentrations >500 nmol/L, suggesting the persistence of potential residual coronary heart disease risk.

Effects of coadministered extended-release niacin/laropiprant and simvastatin on lipoprotein subclasses in patients with dyslipidemia

The use of extended-release niacin and the prostaglandin D₂ receptor antagonist laropiprant (ERN/LRPT) reduces niacin-induced flushing in patients while preserving its lipid-modifying effects. This predefined exploratory analysis examined the individual and combined effects of ERN/LRPT and simvastatin (SIM) on lipoprotein subclasses. This double-blind study randomized 1398 dyslipidemic patients equally to ERN/LRPT 1 g/20 mg, SIM (10, 20, or 40 mg), or ERN/LRPT 1 g/20 mg + SIM (10, 20, or 40 mg) once daily for 4 weeks. At week 5, doses were doubled, except SIM 40 mg (unchanged) and ERN/LRPT 1 g/20 mg + SIM 40 mg (switched to ERN/LRPT 2 g/40 mg + SIM 40 mg). Cholesterol associated with lipoprotein subclasses was quantified by vertical auto profile II (VAP II). ERN/LRPT + SIM and SIM alone lowered LDL-C 1 and 3, whereas the effects were variable for ERN/LRPT; all three treatments increased LDL-C 4. ERN/LRPT + SIM and ERN/LRPT raised HDL-C 2 and 3, with greater relative percent changes in HDL 2 than HDL 3. ERN/LRPT + SIM for 12 weeks produced substantial reductions in IDL-C, which was additive compared with each monotherapy. Coadministered ERN/LRPT + SIM produced marked reductions in atherogenic lipoproteins, with the greatest effect on IDL-C, and increases in protective HDL subclasses.

Distinct effects of pitavastatin and atorvastatin on lipoprotein subclasses in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Effects of pitavastatin and atorvastatin on the lipid profile and lipoprotein subclasses were compared in patients with Type 2 diabetes with dyslipidaemia. Patients with Type 2 diabetes with hypercholesterolaemia and/or hypertriglyceridaemia were randomized to receive pitavastatin 2 mg (n = 16) or atorvastatin 10 mg (n = 15) for 6 months, and blood lipid and lipoprotein profiles and cholesterol and triglyceride contents of 20 lipoprotein subclasses, determined by high-performance liquid chromatography, were compared. At baseline, cholesterol in VLDL and LDL subclasses were increased equally in two groups of patients with diabetes as compared with normolipidaemic control subjects. As compared with baseline, serum levels of total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol:HDL cholesterol ratio and apolipoprotein B were decreased after 1, 3 and 6 months of treatment with atorvastatin and pitavastatin. Serum triglyceride levels were decreased after 1, 3 and 6 months of atorvastatin, but only at 3 months of pitavastatin. Serum HDL cholesterol was increased after 1, 3 and 6 months of pitavastatin, whereas HDL cholesterol was even decreased after 6 months of atorvastatin. Cholesterol levels of most VLDL and LDL subclasses were decreased equally in both groups. However, only pitavastatin increased cholesterol of medium HDL subclass. Serum triglyceride and triglyceride contents in VLDL and LDL subclasses were decreased only by atorvastatin. The impact on lipoprotein subclass profiles was different between pitavastatin and atorvastatin. It may be beneficial to determine lipoprotein subclass profile and select the appropriate statin for each profile in patients with diabetes with an additional cardiovascular risk such as low HDL cholesterol or hypertriglyceridaemia.

Profiles of inflammatory markers and lipoprotein subclasses in patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

Patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) often have inflammation and dyslipidemia that accelerate to atherosclerosis. This study aimed to evaluate chronic inflammation and dyslipidemia in CAPD patients. We measured inflammatory markers and lipoprotein subclasses in 20 CAPD patients (12 men and 8 women, aged 59.5 ± 9.9 y) and 20 gender-matched controls. Lipoproteins were separated by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using an anion-exchange column. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein and serum amyloid A protein (SAA) were higher among CAPD patients vs. controls (1.6 ± 2.2 vs. 0.8 ± 1.2 mg/l, p<0.05; 11.9 ± 12.8 vs. 4.5 ± 2.4 mg/l). HPLC analysis revealed that chylomicron, VLDL, and IDL cholesterol levels were higher among CAPD vs. controls. In contrast, HDL cholesterol was lower among CAPD patients vs. controls. In the subgroup analysis, SAA levels were significantly lower among patients receiving CAPD for >3 y than among controls. However, IDL cholesterol was consistently higher among CAPD patients vs. controls. CAPD patients have chronic inflammation and dyslipidemia. IDL cholesterol is the only lipoprotein subclass that is consistently elevated regardless of CAPD duration. More attention should be paid to dyslipidemia in the management of the CAPD patients.

Effect of ezetimibe/simvastatin compared with atorvastatin on lipoprotein subclasses in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypercholesterolaemia

To evaluate the effects of the usual starting and next higher doses of ezetimibe/simvastatin and atorvastatin on the cholesterol content of lipoprotein subclasses in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypercholesterolaemia. This post hoc analysis compared the effects of treatment with ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/20 mg vs. atorvastatin 10 and 20 mg/day and ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/40 mg/day vs. atorvastatin 40 mg/day on the cholesterol content of lipoprotein subclasses in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population (n = 1013) and in subgroups of patients with triglyceride (TG) levels <200 mg/dl (n = 600) and >or=200 mg/dl (2.6 mmol/l) (n = 413). Ezetimibe/simvastatin significantly reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) subclasses LDL(1)-C, LDL(2)-C and LDL(3)-C; real LDL-C (LDL-C(r)); intermediate-density lipoprotein cholesterol (IDL-C), IDL(1)-C, IDL(2)-C; very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C), VLDL(3)-C; and remnant-like lipoprotein cholesterol (RLP-C) from baseline more than atorvastatin at all dose comparisons (p < 0.01) in the mITT population. Significant improvements were also observed in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) subclass HDL(3)-C at the ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/20 mg vs. atorvastatin 20 mg and highest dose comparisons (p < 0.001) and in VLDL(1 + 2)-C at the lowest and highest dose comparisons (p < 0.001). Changes in LDL(4)-C and LDL-C subclass patterns (A, B and I) were comparable for both treatments. Generally, similar results were observed for patients with TG levels <200 and >or=200 mg/dl (2.3 mmol). For both treatments, notable differences between TG subgroups were that patients with elevated TGs had smaller reductions in LDL(2)-C, slightly smaller decreases in all IDL subclasses and greater decreases in all VLDL-C subclasses than those with lower TG levels. Frequency of pattern B was also reduced more in patients with higher TGs for both treatments. Ezetimibe/simvastatin reduced the cholesterol content of most lipoprotein subclasses from baseline with generally similar efficacy in patients with low and high TGs. Despite the different mechanism of action of ezetimibe, the response to ezetimibe/simvastatin and atorvastatin treatment related to these lipoprotein subclasses was generally consistent with the overall effects of these therapies on the major lipid/lipoprotein classes. The clinical significance of these results awaits further study.

VAP II analysis of lipoprotein subclasses in mixed hyperlipidemic patients on treatment with ezetimibe/simvastatin and fenofibrate

This analysis evaluates the effects on lipoprotein subfractions and LDL particle size of ezetimibe/simvastatin with or without coadministration of fenofibrate in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia. This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study included 611 patients aged 18-79 years randomized in 1:3:3:3 ratios to one of four 12 week treatment groups: placebo; ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/20 mg/day; fenofibrate 160 mg/day; or ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/20 mg/day + fenofibrate 160 mg/day. At baseline and study endpoint, cholesterol associated with VLDL, intermediate density lipoprotein (IDL), LDL, and HDL subfractions was quantified using the Vertical Auto Profile II method. LDL particle size was determined using segmented gradient gel electrophoresis. Whereas fenofibrate reduced cholesterol mass within VLDL and IDL, and shifted cholesterol from dense LDL subfractions into the more buoyant subfractions and HDL, ezetimibe/simvastatin reduced cholesterol mass within all apolipoprotein B-containing particles without significantly shifting the LDL particle distribution profile. When administered in combination, the effects of the drugs were complementary, with more-pronounced reductions in VLDL, IDL, and LDL, preferential loss of more-dense LDL subfractions, and increased HDL, although the effects on most lipoprotein subfractions were not additive. Thus, ezetimibe/simvastatin + fenofibrate produced favorable effects on atherogenic lipoprotein subclasses in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia.

Effect of fluvastatin on apolipoprotein-defined lipoprotein subclasses in patients with chronic renal insufficiency

According to the concept of apolipoprotein (apo)-defined lipoproteins, apoA-I-containing lipoproteins consist of two subclasses referred to as lipoprotein A-I (LpA-I) and lipoprotein A-I:A-II (LpA-I:A-II), and apoB-containing lipoproteins of five subclasses, namely lipoprotein B (LpB), lipoprotein B:C (LpB:C), lipoprotein B:E (LpB:E), lipoprotein B:C:E (LpB:C:E), and lipoprotein A-II:B:C:D:E (LpA-II:B:C:D:E). The purpose of this study was to determine the levels of apoA-I- and apoB-containing lipoprotein subclasses before and after fluvastatin treatment of patients with chronic renal insufficiency. ApoA-I- and apoB-containing lipoprotein subclasses were measured in 15 patients with chronic renal failure and 15 asymptomatic subjects. The effect of fluvastatin on lipoprotein subclasses was determined in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-way, treatment period crossover study. Patients were administered fluvastatin 40 mg/day or placebo during 8 weeks in a randomized order. Patients were characterized by significantly higher levels of LpB (P < 0.001), LpB:C (P < 0.001), and LpB:E (P < 0.05), and slightly higher levels of LpB:C:E and LpA-II:B:C:D:E than controls. The levels of LpA-I:A-II were significantly lower (P < 0.01) in patients than controls. Fluvastatin treatment reduced all apoB-containing subclasses, but only the reduced level of LpB subclass was statistically significant (P < 0.02). The levels of LpA-I and LpA-I:A-II were not affected. Fluvastatin treatment reduced and normalized LpB and LpB:E subclasses. Although slightly reduced, the levels of markedly atherogenic LpB:C subclass were not normalized. The potential role of LpB:C on the progression of coronary artery disease in chronic renal insufficiency remains to be determined in future studies.

Effect of niacin and atorvastatin on lipoprotein subclasses in patients with atherogenic dyslipidemia

This study was conducted to determine the efficacy of atorvastatin and niacin on lipoprotein subfractions in patients with atherogenic dyslipidemia. This was a multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-design study of patients with total cholesterol >200 mg/dl, triglycerides between 200 and 800 mg/dl, and apolipoprotein B >110 mg/dl. Patients were randomly assigned to atorvastatin 10 mg or immediate release niacin 3,000 mg daily for 12 weeks following a low-fat diet stabilization period. Lipoprotein subclasses were measured by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Atorvastatin and niacin both significantly reduced the concentrations of very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) particles (−31% and −29%, respectively) and small low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles (−44% and −35%, respectively). Niacin increased the concentration of large LDL (+75%). Atrovastatin reduced the number of LDL particles more than niacin (31% vs 14%). In patients with atherogenic dyslipidemia, both drugs had important effects on lipoprotein subfractions, which contributed to a reduction in coronary heart disease risk. The drugs equally reduced VLDL subclass levels. Niacin shifted the LDL subclass distribution toward the larger particles, more effectively converted patients from LDL phenotype B to phenotype A, and increased levels of the larger and perhaps more cardioprotective high-density lipoprotein particles. In contrast, atorvastatin preferentially lowered the concentration of small LDL particles without increasing levels of large LDL, and more effectively, reduced LDL particle numbers. Atorvastatin had a preferred LDL effect, whereas niacin had a preferred high-density lipoprotein effect.

Effects of walnut consumption on plasma fatty acids and lipoproteins in combined hyperlipidemia

Epidemiologic studies show an inverse relation between nut consumption and coronary heart disease. We determined the effects of walnut intake on plasma fatty acids, lipoproteins, and lipoprotein subclasses in patients with combined hyperlipidemia. Participants sequentially adhered to the following diets: 1) a habitual diet (HD), 2) a habitual diet plus walnuts (HD+W), 3) a low-fat diet (LFD), and 4) a low-fat diet plus walnuts (LFD+W). In 13 postmenopausal women and 5 men ( +/- SD age 60 +/- 8 y), walnut supplementation did not increase body weight despite increased energy intake and the LFD caused weight loss (1.3 +/- 0.5 kg; P < 0.01). When comparing the HD with the HD+W, linoleic acid concentrations increased from 29.94 +/- 1.14% to 36.85 +/- 1.13% and alpha-linolenic acid concentrations increased from 0.78 +/- 0.04% to 1.56 +/- 0.11%. During the LFD+W, plasma total cholesterol concentrations decreased by 0.58 +/- 0.16 mmol/L when compared with the HD and by 0.46 +/- 0.14 mmol/L when compared with the LFD. LDL-cholesterol concentrations decreased by 0.46 +/- 0.15 mmol/L when compared with the LFD. Measurements of lipoprotein subclasses and particle size suggested that walnut supplementation lowered cholesterol preferentially in small LDL (46.1 +/- 1.9% compared with 33.4 +/- 4.3%, HD compared with HD+W, respectively; P < 0.01). HDL-cholesterol concentrations decreased from 1.27 +/- 0.07 mmol/L during the HD to 1.14 +/- 0.07 mmol/L during the HD+W and to 1.11 +/- 0.08 mmol/L during the LFD. The decrease was seen primarily in the large HDL particles. Walnut supplementation may beneficially alter lipid distribution among various lipoprotein subclasses even when total plasma lipids do not change. This may be an additional mechanism underlying the antiatherogenic properties of nut intake.

1.P.198 The effect of atorvastatin and niacin on lipoprotein subclasses in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia

1.P.198 The effect of atorvastatin and niacin on lipoprotein subclasses in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia

Quantitative and compositional changes in high density lipoprotein subclasses in patients with various genotypes of cholesteryl ester transfer protein deficiency

High density lipoprotein (HDL) with and without apolipoprotein (apo) E was quantified and characterized in subjects with three genotypes of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) deficiency: the nonsense mutation in intron 14 (10 homozygotes and 5 heterozygotes); the missense mutation in the exon 15 (3 homozygotes and 9 heterozygotes); and the Int14A/D442G in 6 compound heterozygotes. ApoE-poor and apoE-rich HDL-cholesterol levels were elevated significantly in all genotypic groups with the decrease in CETP activity, indicating that both types of HDL-cholesterol can be a substrate for CETP. However, an unchanged or only slightly increased serum apoA-II level in each genotype indicated that the HDL particles with apoA-II are relatively resistant to CETP-mediated lipid transfer. Serum apoE-rich HDL level was considerably higher in the Int14A homozygotes than in the compound heterozygotes, in spite of similar apoE-poor HDL-cholesterol levels, which may indicate that apoE-rich HDL is a better substrate for CETP than apoE-poor HDL. Although the apoE-rich and apoE-poor HDL subclasses were similar in the accumulation of cholesteryl ester and depletion of triglyceride, the accumulation of free cholesterol was unique to apoE-rich HDL, indicating inhibited cholesterol esterification on this lipoprotein. Clinical laboratories should be aware of the discrepancy in HDL-cholesterol measurements that comes from the different recoveries of apoE-rich HDL using commercial reagents. In conclusion, CETP deficiency causes considerable quantitative and compositional changes in HDL subclasses, reflecting a significant physiological role for CETP in HDL metabolism.