Lip Augmentation Research Articles

The "4.3," A New Filler Lips Technique.

The "4.3" technique is a hybrid lip augmentation approach that combines the aesthetic benefits of the vertical-lip technique with the fewer entry points of the retrograde linear technique. This method aims to create natural-looking, harmonious, and defined lips using hyaluronic acid (HA)-based fillers, to enhance volume and contour. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and reproducibility of the "4.3" technique in achieving natural lip augmentation with minimal filler volume and reduced injections. This technique is applied to improve the shape and volume of the lips while minimizing the risk of complications. The technique was applied to male and female patients with standard anatomical features who desired subtle enhancements in lip contour, projection, and volume. The procedure involved four injections in the upper lip and three in the lower lip, using a combination of retrograde linear and vertical techniques. A total of 0.7 mL of HA filler were used for each patient. The "4.3" technique achieved consistent and aesthetically pleasing results across all patients, with improvements in lip volume, shape, and definition. The reduced number of injections minimized discomfort and risk of vascular complications. The use of Tri-Hyal technology contributed to smooth, plump lips with harmonious proportions. The "4.3" technique is a standardized, intuitive, and reproducible method suitable for most patients, regardless of sex. It allows for natural-looking lip augmentation using a reduced volume of filler and fewer injections, making it a safe and effective option for enhancing lip aesthetics.

Effectiveness and Safety of IPN-20-SENSE LIDOCAINE for Lip Volume Augmentation and/or Redefinition (SMILE Study): A Non-inferiority Randomized Double-Blinded Controlled Study.

Hyaluronic acid (HA) is a widely used dermal filler for lip augmentation. IPN-20-SENSE LIDOCAINE (Laboratoires VIVACY) is a monophasic gel consisting of cross-linked HA and includes lidocaine hydrochloride for the reduction of injection-associated pain. The SMILE study was designed to assess the non-inferiority of IPN-20-SENSE LIDOCAINE compared to HA-RK-Lido in improving aesthetic lip appearance. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of IPN-20-SENSE LIDOCAINE against the chosen similar active control device. This was a prospective, multicenter, double-blinded, randomized active controlled parallel group study undertaken in two investigational sites between May 2021 and July 2022 (14 months). The primary endpoint of this study was the proportion of subjects reporting an improvement on the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) 3 months after treatment initiation. Regarding the primary endpoint, the difference between the treatment arms in the proportion of improved subjects was +7.0[-2.2;17.7]. The lower limit of this 90%CI, being above the non-inferiority margin of -15 and below zero, demonstrated the non-inferiority of IPN-20-SENSE LIDOCAINE vs. HA-RK-Lido. The secondary outcomes reported by subjects and the blinded live evaluators supported this result. All injection site reactions and device-related adverse events reported in this study were expected, already described and were mostly mild and transient. The study demonstrated the non-inferiority of IPN-20-SENSE LIDOCAINE to HA-RK-Lido in the aesthetic improvement of the lips. The effect of both treatments decreased over time. Nonetheless, aesthetic improvement was sustained longer in the IPN-20-SENSE LIDOCAINE arm. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Lip Augmentation with Soft Tissue Fillers: Social Media, Perceptual Adaptation, and Shifting Beauty Trends beyond Golden Standard Ideals.

Unfortunately, current beauty trends greatly advertised by social media are trespassing recognized cannons of beauty. Of particular interest are patients' expectations of soft tissue volume augmentation of the face, specifically of the lips. An artificial intelligence picture of a White female face was generated. With the fixed standard golden upper-to-lower (U/L) lip ratio, a first set of pictures was generated with varying lip fullness. A second set of pictures was generated with various U/L ratios and lip fullness. In a survey format, the 2 sets of pictures were rated for attractiveness from the most to the least attractive by adult men and women. Rating the first set of pictures clearly demonstrates that overinflation of lips with upper lip height in excess of 30% of hemi-lip width is highly regarded as unaesthetic and unattractive, with a net preference of 20%-25%. For the second set, U/L ratios between 0.618:1 and 1:1 are still regarded to be most aesthetic. Though social media have an influence on perception of beauty, data provided by the survey confirm that golden standards of aesthetics remain constant and that exaggerated requests of some patients may not be attributed solely to social media influence but probably to social media in combination with additional personal predisposing factors. Patients must be made aware that how they are perceived by others is essential for them to be satisfied with their appearance.

Comparative 3D Analysis of Lip Rejuvenation: Investigating Effects Before and After Soft-Tissue Filler Compared with Controls.

The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in lip metrics before and after facial rejuvenation treatment with hyaluronic acid-based fillers and to compare them with those of a control group using stereophotogrammetry (3D). This study included 63 Caucasian women divided into Group C (<30years, n=30) and Group H (>30years, n=33), which was further divided into before (HT0) and after (HT1) lip augmentation with hyaluronic acid (HA). Eleven anthropometric landmarks were identified for linear, angular, and surface area measurements. Three photos were captured in Group C, while Group H had photos taken at T0 and T1. Statistical analysis was conducted using the Shapiro-Wilk test to evaluate normality, the Kruskal-Wallis test and one-way ANOVA. Tukey's post hoc and pairwise comparison tests were performed to analyze differences between variables (P value < 0.05). There were significant differences between lip width (ChR-ChL) and philtrum width (CphR-CphL) (P<.001). The total heights of the upper (Ls-Li) and lower vermilion lips (Sto-Li) increased, and the heights of the upper (Sn-Ls) and lower (Li-Sl) cutaneous lips decreased. The angles related to the philtrum (ChR-CphR-Ls, P<.001; ChL-CphL-Ls, P<.001) and nasolabial angle (Prn-Sn-Ls) (P<.001) exhibited significant differences. The surface areas of the upper, lower, and total vermilion lip showed significant differences (P<.001). Tukey's test indicated no significant differences in surface area after lip augmentation between the HT1 and C groups. Analysis of lip morphology after a filler procedure revealed a reversal of age-related changes, with increases in vermilion lip height and surface area comparable to those of younger individuals. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Ethnic Considerations When Planning Lip Augmentation.

Ideal standards of beauty including preferred lip characteristics vary between ethnicities. Though plump, well-defined lips are globally associated with youth, variation exists with regards to the perceived ideal lip volume and proportions between ethnicities. Proportions that may be assessed when planning lip augmentation include the upper to lower lip ratio, philtrum length, upper and lower vermilion heights, the ratio between the philtrum height and that of the upper vermilion, and the lip height to lip width ratio. It is important that accurate assessments of patients are made pre- and post- augmentation. However, many aesthetic assessment tools are based on Caucasian models with limited use in other ethnicities. We present a review of the ideal lip characteristics and assessment techniques accounting for ethnicity, with a view to providing practitioners an evidence-based approach to lip assessment and treatment planning for patients of all backgrounds.

Advancements in lip augmentation: A scoping review exploring novel techniques.

Lip augmentation is among the most popular cosmetic procedures done today. Advancements in trustworthy techniques have made it feasible to alter the visual characteristics of the lips through the utilization of various injectable substances and surgical procedures. However, there is a lack of standardization in these techniques. The purpose of this review is to focus on novel dermal filler injection and surgical techniques for lip augmentation. We did a scoping review of the literature using PubMed, Embase, and the Google Scholar database to identify all original articles published up to June 2023, assessing new techniques that focus on lip augmentation. In our review, only two studies out of seven included studies were surgical whereas the other five studies were non-surgical. This suggests that injection of dermal fillers is currently the most opted technique performed. This review suggests that incorporating perioral rejuvenation into the plan for lower facial surgery can help to complete the youthful look sought by patients. Injectable fillers provide excellent but short-term benefits and additional options such as Modified upper lip lift and French kiss techniques exist that offer the patient permanent improvements at a low cost.

Blunt dissection with a cannula prior to filler introduction may facilitate lip augmentation and enhance volume

Blunt dissection with a cannula prior to filler introduction may facilitate lip augmentation and enhance volume

Full Face Tailored Treatments Using Hyaluronan Dermal Fillers: Biophysical Characterization for Safe and Effective Approaches

Hyaluronic acid (HA)-based dermal fillers are among the most popular non-invasive facial aesthetic treatments. To ensure an effective and safe treatment experience, knowledge of their biophysical and rheological characteristics, such as: HA concentration, molecular weight (MW), G′, and the degree of cross-linking is essential. Products with a higher MW, G′, and degree of cross-linking are more suitable for promoting volume and lift. Dermal fillers with a lower MW, G′, and degree of cross-linking can produce a soft filling effect that regulates hydration and elasticity. This review discusses how these rheological characteristics can inform treatment choice and their effects on clinical outcomes. The Aliaxin® line of HA dermal fillers, which are tailored to different clinical applications due to their rheological characteristics, highlights that extensive knowledge of the product can provide very safe and effective procedures for patients, whilst respecting their natural facial aesthetics. This review discusses studies using Aliaxin® dermal fillers for volumizing and hydrating treatments and fillers that can be used for lip augmentation. Treatment with Aliaxin® was overall very effective, with no reported adverse events. A full facial treatment using tailored dermal fillers may be a future approach to achieve an effective and safe harmonized and natural aesthetic.

Lip Augmentation With Saypha LIPS Lidocaine: A Postmarket, Prospective, Open-Label, Randomized Clinical Study To Evaluate Its Efficacy and Short- and Long-term Safety.

Versatility, biocompatibility, and reversibility make hyaluronic acid fillers the backbone of minimally invasive lip augmentation procedures. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and short- and long-term safety of Saypha LIPS Lidocaine (Croma Pharma, Leobendorf, Austria) for lip augmentation to correct moderate to severe lip volume deficiency (grade 1-3 lip fullness score [LFS]). In this postmarket, prospective, open-label, multicenter, randomized clinical study, 114 patients were initially treated (with optional touch-up treatment at Week 3). Retrograde and bolus techniques were employed with defined needles or cannula. The primary effectiveness endpoint was the proportion of patients with lip volume improvement of LFS ≥ 1 grade vs baseline at Week 6 (ie, responders); with follow-up (FU) for secondary effectiveness at Months 6, 12, and 18. Evaluation scores included the LFS, Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (investigator and patient), patient satisfaction questionnaire FACE-Q, and a numerical pain rating scale. At Week 6, >90% of the patients were responders (lower-lip: 95% CI, 92.24-99.43, P = .0071; upper-lip: 95% CI, 90.95-99.00, P = .0234), with post hoc analyses showing the outcome was influenced by the initial volume deficiency and total volume injected, but not by touch-up treatment. At Month 6, 90% of the patients were responders; at Month 12, 70%; and at Month 18, >40% still had a visible effect. Adverse events were mostly procedural, mild, and temporary. Pain perception was significantly reduced 15 minutes after the procedure. Aesthetic improvement and patient satisfaction were rated as high at all time points. Saypha LIPS Lidocaine for lip augmentation showed long-term aesthetic improvement and safety.

Comparing the Effects of Different Injection Techniques Used in Lip Augmentation on Filler Migration and Patient Satisfaction.

Lip rejuvenation has several aims, including enhancing lip volume, adjusting the upper and lower lip's length, diminishing fine lines, contouring and redefining the cupid bow and vermilion border, and eversion of the vermilion. Within the scope of this research, we aimed to compare popular injection techniques to augment the size of the lips. This randomized retrospective study included 216 female patients aged 19 to 39, who desired a lip filler treatment from 2017 to 2023. Pre- and post-procedure results were elaborated with top-to-the-bottom technique in Group 1, bottom-to-the-top technique in Group 2, and lateral-to-medial techniques in Groups 3 and 4.Once the patients were sufficiently anesthetized, the hyaluronic acid at a concentration of 20 mg/mL with 0.3% (3 mg/mL) lidocaine, was used in all groups. Patients were followed up for three weeks. Patient satisfaction scores were evaluated on a scale from 0 to 5 using a survey on the last follow-up day. A statistically significant difference was found between the groups regarding satisfaction scores (p<0.05).The patient satisfaction scores after injection were 4.78/5 in Group 1, 3.70/5 in Group 2, 4.15/5 in Group 3, and 3.85/5 in Group 4. Kruskal-Wallis variance analysis for more than two groups revealed statistically significant differences between Group 1 and Group 2 (p<0.001), Group1 and Group 3 (p<0.001), Group 1 and Group 4 (p<0.001), and Group 2 and Group 3 (p=0.009) (Mann Whitney U-Test with Bonferroni adjusted). No major complication was observed in any of the patients. In this study, patient satisfaction was found to be highest in the group with needle orientation top to bottom, taking into account migration to the upper lip. These findings showed that the direction of the needle during injection also determines the direction of distribution of the filler on the lip and may be an important factor in patient satisfaction.

The impact of filling procedure for labial augmentation (FPLA) therapy on the stability of lip print: A longitudinal study

Lip print identification is one of the forensic identification tools recognized a long time ago. Few studies investigated the stability of lip prints, particularly the changes attributed to time or aging. To our knowledge, no previous studies speculated the changes in lip print following lip augmentation therapy, which has increased over the last few years. Therefore, the current study aimed to investigate the effect of lip augmentation therapy on lip print stability. The current study was a prospective longitudinal study that enrolled female volunteers who underwent a filling procedure for labial augmentation. A total of 24 volunteers' prints were analyzed using Suzuki and Tsuchihashi classification. Participants showed a mean age of 27.5 ± 6.0 years. The current study showed that no two lips exhibited the same pattern. Moreover, although the filling procedure for labial augmentation (FPLA) therapy preserved the predominant groove pattern, it significantly influenced the frequency of lip patterns in all lip quadrants. A significant decline in the number of lip grooves, notably Types I and I' was noticed. However, the predominant groove pattern was preserved. Quadrants A and D were the least affected lip parts. Type I′ was the predominant lip pattern over the study population, representing 83.3 %, followed by Type I, representing 16.7 % before and 12.5 % after augmentation without a statistically significant difference (p = 0.317). On the other side, Type III was the least presented pattern. The upper lip score had decreased significantly after augmentation from 71.5 ± 10.8–65.8 ± 10.2, and the lower lip score had decreased significantly from 67.4 ± 13.7–64.9 ± 13.5. Consequently, the overall lips score had decreased significantly from 139.0 ± 22.9–130.7 ± 21.1 after augmentation (p < 0.001). So, we recommend adopting more than one criterion to report a reliable, repeatable lip print, including the frequency of lip lines besides the predominant pattern. However, we advise giving more attention to the distinguished lip patterns (Types II, III, IV, and V) and considering the FPLA as one of the lip print modifiers.

Advancing Lip Augmentation: State-of-the-Art 2D and 3D Analysis for Assessing Volume Enhancement and Lip Line Redefinition

Over the preceding five decades, there has been a noticeable surge in the pursuit of achieving voluminous and well-defined lips. This trend has prompted an escalating number of individuals to undergo lip augmentation procedures, aiming for a natural three-dimensional enhancement of lip volume and distinct vermilion borders. Despite the proliferation of lip augmentation techniques, there remains a dearth of comprehensive investigations into their precise effects on the three-dimensional structural integrity of the lips. This research endeavors to address this gap by employing stereophotogrammetry as a quantitative tool to scrutinize lip augmentation outcomes and to appraise the efficacy of lip plumpers. The study methodology involves a comparative analysis of lip dimensions among subjects treated with a commercial lip plumper using multi-spectral imaging for lip dimension assessment, coupled with markerless tracking technology and 3D interpolating surface methodology to analyze lip volume and shape. Additionally, the study evaluated lip youth state, including moisture level, softness, firmness, and tissue density. The demand for lip augmentation procedures is driven by perceived advantages such as quick recovery and minimal risk. Therefore, it is crucial to substantiate their efficacy with robust findings. The investigation suggests that both 3D and 2D stereophotogrammetry techniques are reliable for evaluating lip size before and after augmentation, whether through cosmetic or aesthetic approaches. Overall, the study provides a comprehensive analysis of a lip treatment aimed at enhancing volume and redesigning lip lines. It demonstrates that stereophotogrammetry is effective for assessing 3D lip dimensions and their correlation with internal lip structure. This research could be particularly valuable for evaluating the efficacy and duration of various lip enhancement techniques, including dermal fillers, implants, and topical cosmetic formulations, offering quantitative and reproducible assessments over time.

9-point Injection Technique for Lip Augmentation and Lip Corner Lifting Using Sonographic Imaging of the Labial Artery Pathway.

As lip enhancement with fillers has grown in popularity, practitioners have sought to identify injection methods that achieve aesthetically pleasing results while avoiding adverse events such as arterial injury due to intravascular injection. The primary objective of this study was to establish a safe injection technique for creating appealing, proportionate, and aesthetically pleasing lips while elevating the lip corners with filler. Before injection, the locations of the superior and inferior labial arteries were established by sonography and a 9-point injection technique (9-PIT) was devised to reliably achieve fashionable lips. Particle hyaluronic acid filler was administered to 50 patients by the 9-PIT and these patients were monitored for 3 months. The extent of lip corner elevation and the angle of lip corners were quantified by 3-dimensional analysis, while changes in the length and curvature along the upper peristomal lines were evaluated after 1 week. The superior and inferior labial arteries originated from the deep lateral aspect of the lip and gradually traversed toward the midline in the superficial layer. Superficial arterial branches were identified in the submucosal layer near the midline. All patients expressed satisfaction with the lip shaping and corner elevation, without any adverse effects or vascular complications. The angle of lip corners decreased by 8.80%, and lip corners were lifted by 1.02 mm. The upper lip exhibited a more pronounced S-shape, with the upper lip line being elongated by 6.5%. This accentuated S-shape contributed to the appearance of lifted lip corners. The 9-PIT facilitated safe and aesthetically pleasing lip volumization with corner elevation in a consistent manner, while elucidating vascular pathways. Lip corner elevation was achieved solely using HA filler.

Tips for the Perfect Lips.

Lip augmentation can correct lip asymmetries, reduce fine lines, define lip shape and Cupid's bow, and add natural fullness to the lips. Achieving a perfect result when injecting lip filler is an art that combines the desire of the patient with the skill of the practitioner and the practitioner's understanding of the surrounding anatomy. It is essential for aesthetic practitioners to prioritize open communication, provide custom-tailored treatments, and have a strong commitment to achieving natural and harmonious results. By following these principles, patients can enjoy the benefits of enhanced lips that boost their self-confidence while maintaining their unique beauty.

Lip augmentation with hyaluronic acid hydrogel cross-linked with polyethylene glycol diglycidyl ether (PEGDE) in two women with autoimmune disease. Case report

Lip augmentation with hyaluronic acid hydrogel cross-linked with polyethylene glycol diglycidyl ether (PEGDE) in two women with autoimmune disease. Case report

Achieving Bratz Doll Look with Lip Fillers: A Prospective Observational Study on Blunt Cannula Techniques.

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a blunt cannula technique using hyaluronic acid fillers for achieving the Bratz doll lip aesthetic, characterized by enhanced volume and sharp definition. Thirty volunteers, 22-40 years of age, were selected based on specific inclusion criteria at Albany Cosmetic and Laser Center for 6 months. The technique involved precise filler injections using a Steriglide blunt cannula. Pre- and postprocedure measurements of lip dimensions and angular changes were meticulously documented and analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics software. The procedure significantly increased the average height of both the upper and lower vermilion zones, with notable changes in angular measurements and the distance between the midline and oral commissure, aligning with the Bratz doll aesthetic. Importantly, none of the participants experienced bruising, a common side effect in traditional needle-based methods. The overall satisfaction rate was high, with an average score of 8.5 out of 10, reflecting the procedure's success in meeting aesthetic goals and ensuring participant comfort. The blunt cannula technique for lip augmentation presents a safe and effective alternative to traditional needle-based methods. The absence of bruising and high satisfaction rates underscore the technique's precision and alignment with patient safety and comfort. This study contributes to the field of cosmetic lip enhancement, offering a novel approach that balances aesthetic aspirations with health considerations, potentially influencing future practices in cosmetic procedures.

A Natural Flat Volumized Lips Filler Technique: Retrospective Analysis of 920 Patients.

Traditionally, hyaluronidase (HYAL) is used after hyaluronic acid (HA) injection to dissolve the undesired migration of product. To describe a novel lip augmentation technique that uses HA and HYAL simultaneously in patients who previously had HA migration. Nine hundred twenty female patients were included. In the first group ( n = 793), HA injections were performed in subcutaneous plane of the lips. In the second group who had previous product migration ( n = 127), 7.5 units of HYAL is injected in 4 points in ergotrid area before proceeding with HA injection. The medicis lip fullness scale scores after 2 weeks improved in all patients, while 92% of patients perceived the results as "very much improved" with Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale ( p ˂ .001). There was no difference between 2 groups regarding the patient satisfaction rates ( p ˃.05), while filler migration was seen in 0.2% ( n : 15) of patients in the first group during the follow-up period. The new vertical injection approach provided an increased vertical height, optimal eversion, and an incisor display on the lips. The simultaneous use of HYAL before HA injection seems to be a safe and effective practice in 1-stage treatment of the previously injected lips with filler migration into ergotrid area.

HYALURONIC ACID LIP AUGMENTATION AND ITS EFFECT ON HUMAN IDENTIFICATION BY CHEILOSCOPY: A CASE REPORT

Cheiloscopy is a human identification technique that consists of studying the lips and their characteristics, such as their thickness, the arrangement of the labial commissure, the position of the grooves and their classifications, as well as recording the impressions produced by them on various supports. Lip augmentation with hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers has become very popular in recent years, especially since facial harmonization was included as a dental specialty. The aim of this study was to verify whether lip fillers with HA have implications for cheiloscopic studies, by means of a clinical case report. A 37-year-old female patient with leukoderma took part in the study. Photographs were taken and measurements of lip thickness, lip commissure layout and lipstick impressions were taken before the lip filler, 15 days after the application of 1 ml of HA and 15 days after the full 2 ml of HA filler. The results of the study suggest that lip filling with HA can interfere with the cheiloscopic method, as there was a change in the architecture of the lips, the layout of the labial commissure, improved contour, cupid's bow and filter, with a significant change in the thickness of the upper and lower lips of approximately 42% in relation to the previous volume. As for the pattern of the lip furrows, there was no change in the designs, however, the quality of the lip impression was affected due to the effect produced by the HA

Real-World Outcomes of Lip Augmentation Using a Hyaluronic Acid-Based Filler With Low 1,4-Butanediol Diglycidyl Ether Content: A Prospective, Open-Label, Multicenter, Post-marketing Study.

Background 1,4-butanediol diglycidyl ether (BDDE) is the most common cross-linker used to produce hyaluronic acid (HA)-based dermal fillers. However, BDDE may have cytotoxic and potentially mutagenic effects, raising safety concerns. Consequently, manufacturers are developing new HA filler formulations with reduced BDDE levels to mitigate potential biological risks. Here, we sought to evaluate the clinical outcomes of lip augmentation performed using an HA-based filler with a reduced BDDE content (Agex Fill Volume®; Biodue SpA, Barberino Tavarnelle, Italy) in a real-world clinical setting. Methods This was a prospective, open-label, multicenter, post-marketing study conducted over six months. Thirty adult subjects (29 women and one man) who desired a ≥1-point improvement on the validated Lip Fullness Scale 2 (LFS2) were enrolled. The primary efficacy endpoint was the post-procedural increase in the investigator-reported LFS2 compared to baseline. Other endpoints included self-perceived happiness assessed using the Happiness Measure Scale (HMS) and safety. Results Of the study participants, 73% (22/30) demonstrated an improvement of at least one point in their LFS2 scores immediately after treatment compared to baseline, thus qualifying as responders. Six months later, the responder rate, based on LFS2 scores, remained steady at 66.7% (20/30). Importantly, these aesthetic improvements were consistently associated with a positive impact on subject-reported HMS, with a significant difference (p < 0.001) between post-treatment and baseline scores. All adverse events (AEs) reported after treatment were mild. Conclusions Agex Fill Volume®, a HA filler with low BDDE content, provides a safe and effective option for enhancing lip volume in real-world aesthetic settings.

Comparison of 2 Fillers for Lip Injection—A Randomized-Controlled Clinical Trial Assessed by 3D Imaging

Abstract Background Lip aging is a concern for many, and hyaluronic acid (HA) injections are a popular solution. Objectives This study compared 2 different HA gel technologies (OBT and NASHA) for lip augmentation in 20 volunteers. Methods Both groups received treatment from the same injector using the same method. Lip volume was measured with a 3D stereophotogrammetry device before, immediately after, and 30 days posttreatment. Patient satisfaction and adverse events were assessed through FACE-Q scales analysis. Results The NASHA group showed an immediate volume increase (P = .01), which decreased after 30 days. The OBT group did not show a significant immediate growth (P = .535) but did exhibit a significant increase after 30 days (P = .014). After 30 days, there were no significant volume differences between the groups (P = .802 and P = .999). FACE-Q analysis revealed no significant differences among groups after 30 days. Conclusions This study highlights that less cohesive gels may modify faster in dynamic lip areas, emphasizing the importance of selecting products based on their physicochemical and rheological properties. In the context of lip augmentation with HA, it is important not to consider immediate aesthetic changes as definitive results, as volume changes may persist and develop over time after the treatment. Level of Evidence: 2