Prior Lines Of Therapy Research Articles

Loncastuximab in high-risk and heavily pretreated relapsed / refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a real-world analysis from 21 US centers.

Outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are poor. Loncastuximab-teserine (Lonca) is an antibody drug conjugate (ADC) which was FDA approved for R/R DLBCL patients who have received at least 2 prior lines of therapy based on the LOTIS-2 trial. However, there are limited data regarding its efficacy in the real-world setting (RWS). This retrospective study included 21 US centers and evaluated outcomes of patients with R/R DLBCL treated with Lonca. Our analysis includes 187 patients with notably higher risk baseline features compared to LOTIS-2 including a higher proportion of patients with bulky disease (17% vs 0%), high-grade B-cell histology (HGBL) (22% vs 8%), and increased number of prior lines of therapy (median 4 vs 3). The complete response (CR) rate was 14% and overall response rate (ORR) was 32%. Median event free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 2.1 and 4.6 months, respectively. Those with bulky disease and HGBL had significantly worse outcomes, and those with non-germinal center cell of origin and CR to most recent line of therapy demonstrated superior outcomes. In summary, in this largest retrospective cohort study of Lonca in the RWS, the response rates, EFS, and OS were lower than those reported in LOTIS-2, which is likely reflective of its use in higher risk and more heavily pre-treated patients within the real world compared to those enrolled on clinical study.

Abstract 4114505: Cardiovascular Adverse Events After Anti-BCMA CAR-T (Ide-Cel and Cilta-Cel) for Relapsed/ Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Introduction: Idecabtagene vicleucel (Ide-Cel) and ciltacabtagene autoleucel (Cilta-cel) are novel CAR-T therapies targeting B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) and approved for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). While cardiovascular adverse events (CVAE) are relatively common with CD-19 CAR-T, the incidence of CVAE in the real-world setting for anti-BCMA CAR-T in RRMM is largely unknown. This study aims to determine the incidence of CVAE and its associated risk factors in patients treated with ide-cel and cilta-cel. Method: This single-center retrospective cohort study evaluated RRMM patients treated with ide-cel and cilta-cel from May 2021 to December 2023. We assessed baseline cardiac and oncologic characteristics and clinical outcomes post-CAR-T. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune cell-associated neurologic syndrome (ICANS) grading followed ASTCT consensus guidelines. Result: A total of 164 RRMM patients treated with ide-cel (N=109) or cilta-cel (N=55) with at least 6 months follow-up were included. The average age was 63 years, and 57% were male. Advanced RRMM stage (R-ISS III) was present in 17% with a median of 6 prior lines of therapy. CRS grade equal or greater than 2 occurred in 22%, and ICANS grade equal or greater than 3 in 6.7%. Twenty patients (12.2%) experienced CVAE, including atrial fibrillation (7.9%), non-sustained ventricular arrhythmia (3.0%), heart failure (3.7%), and cardiovascular death (0.6%). R-ISS III was associated with increased CVAE (52.9% vs. 11.5%; P=0.001). Patients with CVAE had higher baseline ferritin and CRP levels and a higher incidence of CRS grade ≥ 2 (60% vs. 16.7%; P<0.001) and ICANS grade ≥ 3 (20% vs 4.9%; P=0.001). Treatment with tocilizumab, steroids, or anakinra was more common in patients with CVAE. Conclusion: CVAE occurred relatively frequently following BCMA CAR-T therapy, with high-grade CRS identified as a consistent risk factor. Most CVAEs were manageable with appropriate supportive care, including careful observation and active treatment of CRS.

A Phase 2 study of acimtamig (AFM13) in patients with CD30-positive, relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphomas.

Patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) generally have poor prognoses and limited treatment options. This study evaluated the efficacy of a novel CD30/CD16A bispecific innate cell engager, acimtamig (AFM13), in patients with R/R PTCL. Patients included those with CD30 expression in ≥1% of tumor cells and who were R/R following ≥1 prior line of systemic therapy. Acimtamig (200 mg) was administered once weekly in 8-week cycles. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) by fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography per independent review committee; secondary and exploratory endpoints included duration of response (DoR), safety, progression-free survival, and overall survival. The ORR in 108 patients was 32.4% (95% CI: 23.7, 42.1) with a complete response rate of 10.2% (95% CI: 5.2, 17.5); median DoR was 2.3 months (95% CI: 1.9, 6.5). Patients with R/R angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma exhibited the greatest number of responses (53.3% [95% CI: 34.3, 71.7]). Responses were independent of CD30 expression level, prior brentuximab vedotin treatment, or steroid premedication. Acimtamig exhibited a tolerable safety profile; the most common treatment-related adverse events were infusion-related reactions in 27 patients (25.0%) and neutropenia in 11 patients (10.2%). No cases of cytokine release syndrome or acimtamig-related deaths were reported. Despite exhibiting promising clinical activity and tolerable safety in a heavily pretreated PTCL population, the study did not meet the criteria for the primary endpoint. The promising clinical efficacy observed warrants further investigation, and development of acimtamig for patients with R/R CD30+ lymphomas continues in combination with allogeneic natural killer cells.

CTIM-07. A PHASE II, OPEN LABEL, SINGLE ARM STUDY OF NIVOLUMAB FOR RECURRENT OR PROGRESSIVE IDH MUTANT GLIOMAS WITH PRIOR EXPOSURE TO ALKYLATING AGENTS

Abstract BACKGROUND Somatic mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) are an important prognostic factor in patients with gliomas. IDH-mutant gliomas are prone to develop hypermutation after exposure to alkylating agents; in other solid tumors, hypermutation may be a predictive biomarker for PD-1 inhibitor response. In this study, we hypothesize that this specific subgroup of patients would clinically benefit from nivolumab as measured by overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), median progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). METHODS Patients aged 18 years and older with recurrent/progressive IDH-mutant (WHO Grades 2-4) gliomas and prior exposure to alkylating agents were included. Nivolumab was given 240 mg q2w for 8 cycles, then 480 mg q4w until progression, toxicity, study withdrawal, or completion at 2 years. Efficacy was evaluated by ORR of partial (PR) and complete responses (CR) per RANO criteria; low-grade glioma RANO criteria was used for patients with non-enhancing disease. Secondary endpoints included median PFS, median OS, DOR. Toxicity and survival were followed every 3 months until death/study completion. RESULTS Thirty-three patients (66.7% male) were evaluable at study completion. Histology consisted of oligodendroglioma (N=11; 55% Grade 3) and astrocytoma (N=22; 36% Grade 3, 32% Grade 4). Median number of prior lines of systemic therapy was 1 (range 1-6). Median dexamethasone dose at screening was 0 mg (range 0-4). ORR was 9% with two PR and one CR, median DOR 33 months. 11 (32%) patients had stable disease (7 stable for 6+ months) with median PFS 2.2 months and median OS 29.1 months. There were two treatment-related Grade 3 adverse events (lymphopenia and hypotension). One patient discontinued treatment for Grade 2 transaminitis. CONCLUSIONS Though the primary endpoint was not met, three patients have ongoing CR and PR at 54+, 33+ and 24+ months. Future combination therapies with PD-1 inhibitors may increase efficacy in recurrent IDH-mutant gliomas.

CNSC-62. DIFFERENTIAL SURVIVAL IMPACT OF TRASTUZUMAB DERUXTECAN IN HER2-POSITIVE VERSUS HER2-LOW BREAST CANCER PATIENTS WITH BRAIN METASTASES

Abstract BACKGROUND Brain metastases (BM) in breast cancer (BC) present significant treatment challenges, with varying outcomes based on HER2 expression. There is limited real-world evidence of outcomes with the use of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) on survival in patients (pts) with HER2-low and HER2-positive (HER2+) MBC with BM. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from seven US-based health systems within the Guardian Research Network (GRN). We included pts treated with T-DXd from December 2019 to December 2023, classified as HER2-low (IHC 1+ or IHC 2+/HER2 FISH non-amplified) or HER2+ (IHC 3+ or HER2+ with FISH amplified). Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test. RESULTS 125 pts with BCBM treated with T-DXd were included in the final analysis, of which 70 (56%) were HER2+ and 55 (44%) were HER2-low. The median age at BM diagnosis was 60.5 years (range 21.6 to 87.1 years). HER2 low pts had a higher prevalence of ER+ disease than HER2+ pts (81.9% vs. 55.7%, p=0.01). Most of these pts (≥75%) had received multiple prior lines of therapy. HER2+ pts with BM had a median overall survival (mOS) of 9.3 months (95% CI: 6.79-11.88), significantly longer than 4.3 months (95% CI: 1.89-6.82) in HER2-low pts (p < 0.001). At 6 months, OS for HER2+ pts with BM was 40% compared to 25% in HER2-low pts. At 12 months, OS for HER2+ pts was 20% compared to 10% in HER2-low pts. CONCLUSIONS This study represents the largest real-world evidence to date on the effectiveness of T-DXd in treating BM from breast cancer. HER2+ BCBM exhibited longer mOS and 12-month survival rates than pts with HER2-low disease, suggesting HER2 expression is crucial in determining T-DXd’s effectiveness. Future research should explore combination therapies and identify predictive biomarkers to optimize treatment strategies through clinical trials.

Elranatamab (Elrexfio)

Reimbursement reviews are comprehensive assessments of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, as well as patient and clinician perspectives, of a drug or drug class. The assessments inform non-binding recommendations that help guide the reimbursement decisions of Canada’s federal, provincial, and territorial governments, with the exception of Quebec. This review assesses elranatamab (Elrexfio), 40 mg/mL, solution for subcutaneous injection supplied as 76 mg/1.9 mL (40 mg/mL) in a single-dose vial and 44 mg/1.1 mL (40 mg/mL) in a single-dose vial. Indication: For the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who have received at least 3 prior lines of therapy, including a proteasome inhibitor, an immunomodulatory agent, and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, and who have demonstrated disease progression on the last therapy.

Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy has less efficacy in Richter transformation than in de novo large B-cell lymphoma and transformed low-grade B-cell lymphoma.

The activity of anti-CD19 chimerci antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with Richter's transformation (RT) to aggressive large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) is largely unknown. In a multicenter retrospective study, we report the safety and efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy in patients with RT (N=30) compared to patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma (N=283) and patients with transformed indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL) (N=141) between April 2016 and January 2023. Two-thirds of patients received prior therapy for CLL before RT and 89% of them received B-cell receptor and B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitors. Toxicities of CAR T-cell therapy in RT were similar to other lymphomas, with no fatalities related to cytokine release syndrome or immune effector-cell associated neurotoxicity synderome. The 100-day overall response rate and complete response rates in patients with RT were 57% and 47%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 19 months, the median overall survival (OS) was 9.9 months in patients with RT compared to 18 months in de novo LBCL and not reached in patients with transformed iNHL. The OS at 12 months was 45% in patients with RT compared with 62% and 75% in patients with de novo LBCL and transformed iNHL, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, worse OS was associated with RT histology, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, and more prior lines of therapy. CAR T-cell therapy can salvage a proportion of patients with CLL and RT exposed to prior targeted agents; however, efficacy in RT is inferior compared to de novo LBCL and transformed iNHL.

Preclinical evaluation of the CD38-targeting engineered toxin body MT-0169 against multiple myeloma.

Despite significant progress in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), relapsed/refractory patients urgently require more effective therapies. We here describe the discovery, mechanism of action, and preclinical anti-MM activity of engineered toxin body MT-0169, a next-generation immunotoxin comprising a CD38-specific antibody fragment linked to a de-immunized Shiga-like toxin A subunit (SLTA) payload. We show that specific binding of MT-0169 to CD38 on MM cell lines triggers rapid internalization of SLTA, causing cell death via irreversible ribosome inhibition, protein synthesis blockade, and caspase 3/7 activation. In co-culture experiments, bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells did not induce drug resistance against MT-0169. In the preclinical setting, MT-0169 effectively lysed primary MM cells from newly diagnosed and heavily pretreated MM patients, including those refractory to daratumumab, with minimal toxicity against nonmalignant hematopoietic cells. MM cell lysis showed a significant correlation with their CD38 expression levels but not with cytogenetic risk, tumor load, or number of prior lines of therapy. Finally, MT-0169 showed efficient in vivo anti-MM activity in various mouse xenograft models, including one in which MM cells are grown in a humanized bone marrow-like niche. These findings support clinical investigation of MT-0169 in relapsed/refractory MM patients, including those refractory to CD38-targeting immunotherapies.

Matching-adjusted indirect comparison of Acalabrutinib versus Ibrutinib in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma

ABSTRACT Objective In the absence of head-to-head clinical trials, matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) was used to compare 2 Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis) approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). This analysis compares the efficacy and safety of acalabrutinib versus ibrutinib using a more mature dataset than a previously published MAIC. Methods Individual patient data from 122 patients treated with acalabrutinib in a phase 2 study were weighted to match aggregate baseline characteristics of patients pooled from 3 separate trials of ibrutinib. Patients were matched on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, simplified Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index, lactate dehydrogenase, prior lines of therapy, tumor burden, and blastoid histology. Outcomes assessed included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events. Results After matching, differences in PFS between acalabrutinib (median 17.8 months) and ibrutinib (median 12.8 months) were not statistically significant (hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74–1.15; P = 0.48). Similarly, after matching, OS differences between acalabrutinib (median 36.5 months) and ibrutinib (median 27.9 months) did not reach statistical significance (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.64–1.17; P = 0.35). Acalabrutinib was associated with an improved safety profile compared with ibrutinib, with statistically significantly lower rates of grade ≥3 atrial fibrillation and thrombocytopenia. Conclusions This comparison of 2 BTKis used in the treatment of R/R MCL showed that PFS and OS risk was not statistically different between the treatments; however, acalabrutinib had an improved safety profile compared with ibrutinib.

Long-term 3-year follow-up of mosunetuzumab in relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma after ≥2 prior therapies

AbstractMosunetuzumab, a CD20×CD3 T-cell engaging bispecific antibody, redirects T cells to eliminate malignant B cells. We present updated efficacy and safety data of a pivotal phase 1/2 study after a median follow-up of 37.4 months in 90 patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) and ≥2 prior lines of therapy treated with fixed-duration mosunetuzumab. Investigator-assessed complete response (CR) rate and objective response rate were 60.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49.1-70.2) and 77.8% (95% CI, 67.8-85.9), respectively. Among 70 responders, median duration of response was 35.9 months (95% CI, 20.7 to not estimable [NE]). Among 54 patients who achieved CR, 49 remained in CR at the end of treatment; median duration of CR was not reached (NR; 95% CI, 33.0 to NE); Kaplan-Meier-estimated 30-month remission rate was 72.4% (95% CI, 59.2-85.6). Estimated 36-month overall survival (OS) rate was 82.4% (95% CI, 73.8-91.0); median OS was NR (95% CI, NE to NE). Median progression-free survival was 24.0 months (95% CI, 12.0 to NE). Median time to CD19+ B-cell recovery was 18.4 months (95% CI, 12.8-25.0) after 8 cycles of mosunetuzumab treatment. No new cytokine release syndrome events or fatal, serious, or grade ≥3 adverse events were reported. With extended follow-up, mosunetuzumab demonstrated high response rates, durable remissions, and manageable safety with no long-term concerns. This supports outpatient mosunetuzumab administration as an off-the-shelf, fixed-duration, safe, and effective treatment for patients with R/R FL, including those with high-risk disease. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02500407.

Matching-adjusted indirect comparisons of zanubrutinib (MAGNOLIA, BGB-3111-AU-003) versus ibrutinib (PCYC-1121) and rituximab (CHRONOS-3) in relapsed/refractory marginal zone lymphoma.

In the absence of head-to-head randomized trials, unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparisons were conducted to estimate the relative efficacy of zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib and zanubrutinib versus rituximab in relapsed or refractory marginal zone lymphoma (MZL). Logistic propensity score models were used to estimate weights for the patient-level data from two phase II single-arm trials, MAGNOLIA and BGB-3111-AU-003, such that their characteristics matched the ibrutinib and rituximab aggregate-level data from PCYC-1121 and CHRONOS-3, respectively. The base case model for each comparison incorporated four key prognostic factors: prior lines of therapy, MZL subtype, response to prior therapy, and age. A sensitivity analysis incorporating additional prognostic factors was also conducted for the ibrutinib comparison. The impact of each covariate was explored via a leave-one-out analysis. Compared with ibrutinib and rituximab, zanubrutinib demonstrated significant benefits in terms of both overall response and progression-free survival in patients with previously treated MZL.

Combined PD-1 and CTLA-4 Blockade in an International Cohort of Patients with Acral Lentiginous Melanoma.

Combination immune checkpoint blockade targeting PD-1 and CTLA-4 leads to high response rates and improved survival in advanced cutaneous melanoma (CM). Less is known about the efficacy of this combination in acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM). To determine the efficacy of combination immune checkpoint blockade targeting PD-1 and CTLA-4 in a real-world, diverse population of ALM. This multi-institutional retrospective study analyzed patients with histologically confirmed ALM treated with the combination of PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors between 2010-2022. The primary objective of the study was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST criteria. The secondary objectives were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). In total, 109 patients with advanced ALM treated with combined PD-1 and CTLA-4 blockade in any line of treatment were included. The majority of patients had stage IV disease (n=81, 74.2%). The ORR for the entire cohort was 18.3% (95% CI 11.6-26.9%), with 9 (8.3%) complete responses (CR) and 11 (10.1%) partial responses (PR). An additional 22 patients (20.2%) had stable disease (SD), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 38.5%. The median PFS was 4.2 months [95% CI 3.25-5.62], while the median OS was 17 months [95% CI 12.4%-23.1%]. A total of 95 patients (87.2%) had a treatment-related adverse event, with 40.4% (n=44/109) experiencing at least one grade 3 or 4 toxicity. Elevated LDH (p=.04), 2+ lines of prior therapy (p=.03), and Asian race/ethnicity (p=.04) were associated with worse OS, while Hispanic/Latino race/ethnicity was associated with better OS (p=.02). Combination of PD-1 and CTLA-4 blockade is less effective for ALM, as compared to CM, despite similar toxicity. Asian patients, in particular, appear to derive lower benefit from this regimen. Novel treatment approaches are needed for this rare melanoma subtype.

Impact of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant on Safety and Outcomes of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell (CAR-T) Therapy in Patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM).

Background: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) has seen limited use in treating multiple myeloma (MM), despite its potential to offer long-term survival or even cure through the graft-versus-myeloma effect. Its limited application is largely due to concerns over serious complications like infections and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). The possibility of GVHD exacerbation when CAR-T cells are administered to patients previously treated with allo-SCT remains a topic of concern. Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (Cilta-cel) and idecabtagene vicleucel (Ide-cel) are CAR-T therapies that have been FDA-approved for relapsed/refractory (R/R) MM. A recent study using data from the CARTITUDE-1 trial has shown promising safety and efficacy of Cilta-Cel in patients with a prior history of allo-SCT. This report outlines our real-world experience with CAR-T treatment in such patients. The objective of this study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of CAR-T therapy in R/R MM patients who have previously undergone allo-SCT. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of adult patients (18-70 years old) with R/R MM treated with CAR-T therapy as part of an institutional IRB-approved protocol. Data were collected on safety and efficacy outcomes from the institution's records. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 5.0. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) were graded based on American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) criteria. Efficacy metrics included overall response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS), analyzed through the Kaplan-Meier method, with PFS defined as the time from CAR-T initiation to disease progression or death. Results: Of the 56 patients treated with CAR-T therapy, 8 (14.3%) had previously undergone allo-SCT. These patients had a median of seven prior therapy lines (LOTs), compared to five LOTs in the non-allo-SCT group (p = 0.04). CAR-T infusion occurred a median of 98.8 months after allo-SCT, with a range from 57.9 months to 178.5 months. CRS occurred in 87.5% of the allo-SCT group versus 77.1% in the non-allo-SCT group (p = 0.48). One patient in the allo-SCT group developed hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), requiring anakinra. At a median follow-up of 4.8 months, the ORR was 87.5% in the allo-SCT group versus 75% in the non-allo-SCT group (p = 0.4). Median PFS had not been reached for the allo-SCT group at the time of analysis compared to 11.9 months in the non-allo-SCT group (p = 0.5). No treatment-related mortality or acute GVHD was noted in the allo-SCT cohort. Conclusions: The study suggests that prior allo-SCT does not adversely affect the safety or efficacy of CAR-T therapy in patients with R/R MM. These findings highlight the need for further investigations with larger patient samples and longer follow-up to better understand the interaction between allo-SCT and CAR-T therapy.

Engaging a New Treatment Paradigm: Elranatamab in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

To review the therapeutic profile of elranatamab, a novel bispecific T-cell-redirecting therapy, in treating relapsed or refractory (R/R) multiple myeloma (MM). A PubMed search was conducted for English-language articles published from January 2000 through June 2024, using the search terms: PF-06863135, elranatamab, Elrexfio, and "Multiple Myeloma." Additional data were obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov and other pertinent publications and meeting abstracts. Clinical trials, guidelines, and prescribing information pertaining to elranatamab were included. The phase II MagentisMM-3 trial demonstrated an overall response rate of 61.0% (95% confidence interval, 51.8-69.6) in patients naïve to B-cell maturation antigen targeting therapy (cohort A, n = 123), establishing elranatamab monotherapy as a viable treatment option for patients with R/R MM who have received at least 4 prior lines of therapy. The duration of response and progression-free survival at 12 months were 75.3% and 56.6%, respectively. Despite the promising activity of elranatamab in R/R MM, the significant treatment-related adverse effects (AEs) associated with this therapy necessitate careful monitoring and expert management. Common AEs include cytokine release syndrome, neurotoxicity, hematologic toxicity, and infectious complications. The cost-effectiveness of elranatamab has yet to be evaluated. Elranatamab is approved by the Food and Drug Administration as a treatment option for patients with heavily pretreated R/R MM. Further studies are warranted to identify the optimal treatment strategy for elranatamab and other bispecific antibodies in the management of R/R MM.

FDA Approval Summary: Teclistamab - A Bispecific CD3 T-cell Engager for Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

On October 25, 2022, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted accelerated approval to teclistamab-cqyv (TECVAYLI; Janssen Biotech) for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who have received at least four prior lines of therapy, including a proteasome inhibitor, an immunomodulatory agent and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody. Substantial evidence of effectiveness was obtained from the MajesTEC-1 trial, a phase 1/2, single-arm, open-label, multi-center study. Patients received step-up doses of teclistamab at 0.06 mg/kg and 0.3 mg/kg followed by 1.5 mg/kg subcutaneously once weekly until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. An overall response rate of 61.8% was observed, with a complete response or better rate of 28.2%. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 72% of patients and neurologic toxicity (NT) occurred in 57%, including immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) in 6%. Due to the risk of CRS and NT, including ICANS, the U.S. prescribing information for teclistamab includes a boxed warning and teclistamab is available only through a restricted program under a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy. Here, we summarize the data and FDA review supporting the accelerated approval of teclistamab, a BCMA-directed bispecific antibody that was the first bispecific CD3 T-cell engager approved for treatment of multiple myeloma.

PD-1 inhibitor sintilimab treated patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly challenging subtype due to a unique tumor microenvironment. Several evidence (IMpassion130 trial and KEYNOTE-355 trial) supported the therapeutic effect of the immune checkpoint inhibitor in TNBC. However, the efficacy and safety of the PD-1 inhibitor sintilimab in breast cancer (BC) has not been well-investigated. So the real-world data on sintilimab-treated patients with metastatic BC were collected and analyzed in this study. The patients were eligible according to the requirements included: ages between 18years and 75years; recurrent or metastatic TNBC; measurable disease based on RECIST v1.1; no limitation on the prior systemic treatments; and ECOG performance status of 0-1. Patients received sintilimab 200mg intravenously every 3 weeks until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. From 1 June 2019 to 1 October 2022, 40 female patients (median age, 55.5years) with metastatic TNBC (mTNBC) were enrolled into the study. The median prior lines of systemic therapy for mTNBC was three (range, 1-8), with 60% of cases receiving at least three lines of therapy for metastatic disease. The visceral or brain metastasis was detected in 40.4% or 9.6% of patients, respectively. The median duration of response was 2.8months (range, 0.7-21.0), and the median number of sintilimab doses administered was 4 (range, 1-30). The ORR and DCR were 22.5% and 72.5%, separately. The median PFS was 3.5 months (range, 1.4-21.0), with a 6-month PFS rate of 15.0% (6/40). The median OS was 52.5months (range, 9.0-247.0) as of data cut-off. Common adverse effects were acceptable, and fatigue, skin rash, and pruritus were the frequent toxicity observed. Two cases of grade 3 curable adverse events were considered to be treatment-related. PD-L1-positive tumor was found in 40% cases (4/10) of mTNBC. Although statistical difference was not reached, the trend was obvious. Patients with PD-L1-positive tumor gained better treatment response, while the TMB-high carrier received more benefits of PFS and OS. In our study, preliminary evidence provided the anticancer activity and acceptable adverse effects of sintilimab administered every 3 weeks to pretreated patients with mTNBC. Sintilimab showed its efficacy and safety of immunotherapy for patients with advanced TNBC.

Daratumumab-Based Therapeutic Approaches and Clinical Outcomes in Multiple Myeloma and other Plasma Cell Dyscrasias: Insights from a Nationwide Real-World Chart Review Study.

Singapore leads Southeast Asia in the routine use of daratumumab for multiple myeloma and other plasma cell dyscrasias. This retrospective review analyzed 112 patients who received daratumumab between 2012 and 2020. Tolerability, and efficacy based on prior lines (PL) of therapy, cytogenetic risk group, and the presence of renal impairment were presented. Infusion-related reactions occurred in 26.8% of patients. Grades 1 and 2 hematological and non-hematological adverse events were observed in 14.3% and 33.9% of patients, respectively. After a median follow-up of 16.9 months, there was no significant difference in overall response rates (ORR) (86% versus 76.3%, p = 0.082) or depth of response (≥ complete response (CR), 35.1% versus 28.9%, p = 0.469) between myeloma patients with and without renal dysfunction. Newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory patients had an ORR of 92% and 76.3%, and a ≥ VGPR (very good partial response) rate of 80% and 55.3%, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was better for patients with 0/1 PL compared to ≥ 2 PLs (19.8 versus 6.2 months, p < 0.001), with a deeper response (≥ CR, 38.5% versus 16.7%, p = 0.033). Forty-six and a half percentage of patients had high-risk FISH abnormalities, and those with 0/1 PL had a significantly better ORR than those with ≥ 2 PLs (83.3% vsersus 47.1%, p = 0.022), achieving an ORR similar to that of the general cohort (80.2%, p = 0.905). In conclusion, positioning daratumumab in earlier lines of therapy leads to better outcomes and may mitigate the impact of high-risk FISH abnormalities.

Safety and efficacy of standard-of-care ciltacabtagene autoleucel for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

AbstractCiltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy was approved in 2022 for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). We report outcomes with cilta-cel in the standard-of-care setting. Patients with RRMM who underwent leukapheresis for cilta-cel manufacturing between 1 March 2022 and 31 December 2022 at 16 US academic medical centers were included. In terms of results, 255 patients underwent leukapheresis and 236 (92.5%) received cilta-cel. Of patients who underwent leukapheresis, 56% would not have met the CARTITUDE-1 trial eligibility criteria. Manufacturing failure rates at first attempt and overall were 6% and 1%, respectively. The median of prior lines of therapy was 6. In treated patients (n = 236), cytokine release syndrome was seen in 75% (grade ≥3, 5%), immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome in 14% (grade ≥3, 4%), and delayed neurotoxicity in 10%. Best overall and complete response or better rates were as follows: for patients who received infusion (n = 236), 89% and 70%; patients receiving conforming CAR T-cell product (n = 191), 94% and 74%; and conforming CAR T-cell product with fludarabine/cyclophosphamide lymphodepletion (n = 152), 95% and 76%, respectively. Nonrelapse mortality was 10%, most commonly from infection. After a median follow-up of 13 months from CAR T-cell therapy, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached, with the 12-month estimate being 68% (95% confidence interval, 62-74). High ferritin levels, high-risk cytogenetics, and extramedullary disease were independently associated with inferior PFS, with a signal for prior B-cell maturation antigen–targeted therapy (P = .08). Second primary malignancies excluding nonmelanoma skin cancers were seen in 5.5% and myeloid malignancies/acute leukemia in 1.7%. We observed a favorable efficacy profile of standard-of-care cilta-cel in RRMM, despite more than half the patients not meeting the CARTITUDE-1 eligibility criteria.

Clinical Efficacy of Isatuximab Plus Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients.

Isatuximab, a novel anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, is approved in combination with carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Isa-Kd) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients. Because of its recent introduction, real-world efficacy and safety are poorly reported. In this Italian multicenter real-life observational retrospective study, efficacy and safety of the Isa-Kd regimen were evaluated in a cohort of 103 RRMM patients. Overall response rate (ORR) was 85%, with stringent (sCR) or complete response (CR) in 18% of cases and very good partial response (VGPR) in 39%. Median PFS and OS were not reached within the study period, while 1-year PFS and OS were 72% and 77%, respectively. Hematological toxicities were observed in 42% of subjects, and cardiac toxicities occurred in 24% of cases. Moreover, we conducted a subanalysis on patients (N = 69) treated with Isa-Kd after one prior line of therapy, showing an ORR of 88%, with sCR + CR in 20% of subjects, VGPR in 46%, and PR in 22% of patients. In this group, median PFS and OS were not reached, while 1-year PFS and OS were 92% and 95%, respectively. In conclusions, our study confirmed Isa-Kd as an effective treatment option for RRMM with a manageable safety profile even in real-life settings.

Belantamab Mafodotin in Relapsed/Refractory AL Amyloidosis: Real-World Multi-Center Experience and Review of the Literature

Introduction: Treatment for relapsed/refractory AL amyloidosis (AL) is an unmet need. The safety and efficacy of belantamab mafodotin (BLM) in multiple myeloma are known, whereas in AL data are limited. Methods: We report a multi-center cohort of AL patients receiving BLM, and review all previous data on BLM therapy in AL. Results: Twelve patients with a median of 3 (range 2–9) prior lines of therapy were included. The overall hematological response rate (ORR) was 75% (9/12), including 5 complete responses. Six of the 10 evaluable patients had organ responses. The median event-free survivals/overall survivals were 22.3 and 28.8 months, respectively. Grade 3 toxicities were mostly infections and keratopathy, occurring in 7/12 (58%). Hematological toxicities were rare. No grade 4/5 toxicities occurred. The review of the previous series reveals BLM provides an ORR of 60–83% with similar rates of corneal toxicity. Conclusion: BLM, being an off-the-shelf therapy, with acceptable toxicity even in frail patients, may be a valuable option in AL, with a high ORR, and a signal for durable responses and high-quality organ responses.