Linac-based Radiosurgery Research Articles

A multi-institutional trial evaluating the use of an integrated quality assurance phantom for frameless single-isocenter multitarget stereotactic radiosurgery.

Brain radiosurgery treatments require multiple quality-assurance (QA) procedures to ensure accurate and precise treatment delivery of ablative doses. As single-isocenter multitarget radiosurgery treatments become more popular for treating patients with multiple brain metastases, quantifying off-axis accuracy of linear accelerators is crucial. In this study, we developed a novel brain radiosurgery integrated phantom and validated this phantom at multiple institutions to enable radiosurgery QA with a single phantom to facilitate implementation of a frameless single-isocenter, multitarget radiosurgery program. The phantom combines multiple independent verification system tests including the Winston-Lutz test, off-axis accuracy evaluation (i.e., off-axis Winston-Lutz), as well as dosimetric measurements utilizing both point dose and film measurement. A novel 3D-printed phantom, coined OneIso, was designed with a movable insert which can switch between Winston-Lutz test targets and dose measurement without moving the phantom itself. In total, four phantoms were printed, and eight institutions participated in this study, which included both Varian TrueBeam (n=6) and Elekta Versa (n=2) linear accelerators. For off-axis Winston-Lutz measurements, a row of off-axis ball-bearings (BBs) was integrated into the OneIso. To quantify the spatial accuracy versus distance from isocenter, two-dimensional displacements were calculated between the planned and delivered BB locations relative to their respective MLC-defined field borders. For dose verification, brain radiosurgery clinical treatment plans previously treated were delivered at multiple cancer centers (six of eight centers). Radiochromic film and pinpoint ion chamber comparison measurements were obtained with OneIso. Dose verification performed using the OneIso phantom across the different centers were all within on average 3% agreement, for both film and point-dose measurements. OneIso identified a reduction in spatial accuracy further away from isocenter for all eight radiosurgery machines. Differences increased as distance from isocenter increased, exceeding recommended radiosurgery accuracy tolerances (<1mm) at different distances for each machine (2-7cm), indicating that the tolerance is machine-dependent. OneIso provides a streamlined, single-setup workflow for single-isocenter multitarget frameless linac-based radiosurgery QA that can be easily translated to multiple institutions. Additionally, quantifying off-axis spatial discrepancies allows for determination of the maximum distance between targets and iso that meet single-isocenter multitarget radiosurgery program recommendations.

Feature Analysis of Predictors Affecting the Nidus Obliteration of Linear Accelerator-Based Radiosurgery for Arteriovenous Malformations Using Explainable Predictive Modeling

This study aimed to evaluate prognostic factors associated with nidus obliteration following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for cerebral arteriovenous malformations. From January 2001 to January 2018, 119 patients who underwent SRS with AVM were studied to analyze major prognostic factors (age, prescription dose (Gy), volume (mm3), nidus size (cm), and Spetzler–Martin (SM) grade) for nidus obliteration. A random forest and tree explainer was used to construct a predictive model of nidus obliteration. The prognostic factors affecting nidus obliteration from most to least important were age, nidus size, volume, total prescription dose, and SM grade, using a predictive model. In a specific case for nidus size (1.5 cm), total dose (23 Gy), and SM grade (2), the result showed a high obliteration score of 0.75 with the actual obliteration period of 6 months spent; the mean AUC was 0.90 in K-fold cross validation. The predictive model identified the main contributing factors associated with a prognostic of nidus obliteration from linear accelerator-based SRS for cerebral AVM. It was confirmed that the results, including the prognostic factors, are potentially useful for outcome prediction for patient and treatment.

Cochlear sparing in LINAC-based radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma: a dosimetric comparison of dynamic conformal arc, IMRT and VMAT treatment plans

BackgroundStereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is the preferred treatment for vestibular schwannoma (VS) in patients with preserved hearing and tumour diameter < 3 cm. Emerging evidence suggests restricting cochlear dose could preserve hearing. This retrospective replanning study aims to compare dynamic conformal arc therapy (DCAT), intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for superiority of cochlear dose sparing without compromising tumour coverage.MethodsEligibility criteria included sporadic VS, serviceable hearing and availability of CT and MRI for planning. The original gross tumour volume and brainstem OAR volume were retained; the cochlea was newly contoured on the planning CT scan (bone window). Each case was replanned using the three above techniques, prescribing 12 Gy to the 80% isodose line. No dose constraint was applied to the cochlea.ResultsEighteen patients were replanned. Mean tumour volume was 2.25 cc. Tumour coverage and tumour mean dose (DCAT: 14.2, IMRT: 14.6, VMAT: 14.5 Gy) were comparable. Paddick and RTOG conformity indices were better for DCAT (0.66 and 1.6) and VMAT (0.69 and 1.5) compared to IMRT (0.56 and 1.9). DCAT had superior gradient index (3.0) compared to VMAT (3.4) and IMRT (3.4). VMAT delivered the lowest mean brainstem maximum dose (8.3 Gy) and decreased the mean cochlear dose (3.4 Gy) by 2.3 and 2.1 Gy, and the mean cochlear maximum dose (3.6 Gy) by 2.4 and 2.5 Gy relative to DCAT and IMRT, respectively.ConclusionLINAC-based SRS treatment using VMAT can achieve better cochlear dose sparing than DCAT or IMRT while maintaining tumour coverage.

Multi-Center Quality of Life Outcomes for Patients with Acoustic Neuromas Treated with a Non-Invasive Stereotactic Radiosurgery Instrument and Linear Accelerator-Based Radiosurgery

<h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3> Prior studies have reported favorable local control for patients treated with Gamma Knife (GK) or linear accelerator (LINAC)-based radiosurgery (SRS); however, direct comparison of detailed patient-reported quality of life (QOL) outcomes are lacking. This multi-center retrospective review assessed for differences in QOL outcomes and toxicity profiles after radiotherapy for acoustic neuromas in patients treated with GK and LINAC-based radiosurgery. <h3>Materials/Methods</h3> In this multi-center single institution analysis, we retrospectively reviewed acoustic neuroma cases treated with either GK or LINAC-based SRS between 2008-2017. We compared pre- and post- treatment clinical outcomes including new development of tinnitus, vertigo, gait disturbance, facial palsy, hydrocephalus and audiometric data. We also collected radiographic and dosimetric information including tumor size and dose to cochlea. Descriptive statistics were performed and χ² was utilized to assess for intergroup differences in clinicoradiographic or dosimetric differences. Univariate and multivariate multinomial logistic regression analyses were performed with backward selection at alpha of 0.2 to assess for statistically significant associations with the development of the clinical endpoints described above. <h3>Results</h3> A total of 85 patients were included in our review, 36 in the GK group and 49 in the LINAC-SRS group. 39 patients were male (45.9%) and 46 female (54.1%), 45 were left-sided tumors (52.9%) and 40 right-sided tumors (47.1%). All patients were treated with single-fraction SRS, with a prescription of 12.5 Gy for GK and 12 Gy for LINAC-based SRS. Median follow up was 25 months (median 21 months in GK group, 26 months in LINAC group). On multivariate analysis, there was no significant difference in the development of post-treatment tinnitus, vertigo, gait disturbance, facial palsy, hydrocephalus, change in Gardner Robertson Grade, or change in hearing between the GK and LINAC treatment groups (p> 0.05). Similarly, multivariate analysis did not show tumor size or cochlear dose to be associated with development of specific toxicities between treatment modalities (p>0.05). <h3>Conclusion</h3> This multi-center retrospective review found no significant differences in patient-reported QOL outcomes for patients treated with either Gamma Knife or LINAC-based radiosurgery for acoustic neuromas. This study adds to the body of evidence that both modalities are feasible approaches with similar toxicity profiles for the treatment of acoustic neuromas, and patients can be counselled as such.

Cochlear Implants: What the Neurosurgeon Needs to Know.

Patients with cochlear implants (CIs) commonly undergo neurosurgical interventions for concurrent pathologies. The neurosurgeon must be aware of the limitations these devices place on treating these patients and all pertinent interactions CIs have with common neurosurgical instruments and procedures. A literature search was performed utilizing the terms "cochlear implant" and "neurosurgery" or "neurosurgical" and all associated iterations. We reviewed the abstracts of 146 generated reports and eight published papers discussing the interaction and limitations of CI use in different neurosurgical procedures. Five realms were identified in which a CI may potentially interfere with standard neurosurgical care: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), radiotherapy, deep brain stimulation (DBS),intraventricular shunt placement, andintraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM). First, MRI use with CIs is limited due to thermal injury risk, imaging disruption, and implant damage. Secondly, high-dose >50 Gysingle-fraction linear accelerator-based radiosurgery has been demonstrated to result in a loss of radio frequency link range in CIs, interfering with their function. Next, during surgery for DBS, the need for MRI and microelectrode recording requires CI magnet removal by neurotology and the surgeon must communicate with a non-hearing patient. Tunneling of shunts must accommodate CI position retroauricularly, if ipsilateral, and programmable valves must be placed >2 cm from the CI to prevent interference. Intraoperative neuromonitoring may produce voltages that interfere with CIs, and while monopolar cautery may pose the same risk, no study has proven this to date. Generally, bipolar cautery is safe and favored >1 cm from CIs. MRI use is limited in CI patients, although MRI-safer devices are in production. DBS electrodes may be successfully placed after CI magnet removal. Programmable shunt valves may be placed >2 cm away from CIs and radiosurgery <50 Gy has not demonstrated harm to these devices. IONM and monopolar cautery have not been demonstrated to directly affect CIs; however, more research is needed.

PO-1136 Linac-based Radiosurgery and Hypofractionated radiotherapy for the Meingeomas

PO-1136 Linac-based Radiosurgery and Hypofractionated radiotherapy for the Meingeomas

LINAC-based radiosurgery for functional and psychiatric disorders: Problems and their solutions.

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is practically non-invasive treatment option, and its application for ablative procedures in functional and psychiatric brain disorders seems rather promising. In such cases, gamma knife surgery (GKS) is considered a standard option due to its proved accuracy in targeting and dosimetry. However, modern linear accelerators (LINAC), which are the most commonly used radiosurgical device, provide comparable treatment preciseness. Although at present experience with LINAC-based SRS of functional brain disorders is rather limited, from the technological viewpoint it definitely seems possible and theoretically may be of the similar efficacy as established with GKS for the same indications. However, widespread introduction of such practice requires resolution of several important methodological issues, particularly related to establishment of specific treatment standards, development of dedicated training for involved medical professionals, and creation of the data accumulation and outcome analysis systems.

RADIOSURGERY FOR MULTIPLE BRAIN METASTASES IN NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER – PARADIGM SHIFT

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to present a case of multiple brain metastases treated with LINAC-based radiosurgery (SRS). Materials and methods: Case report and a summary review of pertinent literature regarding SRS for multiple brain metastases. Results / Case Study: This case presents a patient with non- small cell lung cancer diagnosed with nine brain metastases who was treated with SRS. During follow-up, all brain lesions showed complete response with minimal impact on the patient’s quality of life.

PD-0942 Intrafraction error analysis of homemade mouth-bite masks in linac-based SRS for brain metastasis

Purpose or Objective To assess the intrafraction accuracy of a frameless stereotactic linac-based radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases (BM) using a homemade mouth-bite thermoplastic mask in combination with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and six-degrees of freedom (6-DOF) couchtop. Materials and Methods Covid-19 restrictions resulted in significant delays in the supply of the dedicated devices for BM SRS. A frameless approach using a homemade mouth-bite thermoplastic mask was implemented to offer BM SRS in a period of limited mobility (figure 1). All patients were immobilized and treated at the same institution with 6 MV FFF VMAT radiosurgery, with a 2 mm isotropic expansion from the GTV to the PTV. Before treatment delivery, patients underwent a low-dose CBCT to check position accuracy. Through image co-registration, translational (x, y, z) and rotational errors (roll, pitch, and yaw) were determined. The 6-DOF couchtop was used to automatically relocate the patient with sub-millimetric precision. Immediately after irradiation, patients underwent a second CBCT to verify any translational or rotational errors occurring during therapy (intrafraction motion). $Φg Results From February 2020 to January 2021 sixteen patients (29 lesions) received BM SRS (14-21 Gy). The whole procedure, from the first CBCT scan to the end of irradiation and subsequent CBCT, required a median time of 9 minutes [6-13]. Mean translational error was 0.0 ± 0.3 mm [-0.7;0.9] in lateral direction, and -0.1 ± 0.5 mm [-1.4;1.0] in longitudinal direction. A 2.2 mm maximum shift was recorded on the vertical axis, nevertheless the mean translation error was 0.1 ± 0.6 mm. Roll, pitch and yaw registered a mean value of -0.1 ± 0.3° [-0.8;0.2], 0.0 ± 0.2° [-0.8;0.2], and -0.1 ± 0.3° [-0.8;0.4], respectively. The results are summarized in figure 2. Conclusion This study demonstrated that homemade mouth-bite thermoplastic masks combined with CBCT, 6-DOF couchtop, and fast FFF treatment delivery allow minimal intra-fraction uncertainties in BM SRS, confirming the accuracy of PTV margin definition. The results are comparable to the declared specifics of SRS dedicated commercial frameless mask, while improving patient's comfort compared to the invasive fixed frame. However, the moulding procedure requires improved RTT skills and expertise. Our findings show that SRS can be safely delivered in radiotherapy units without dedicated expensive installations, such as CyberKnife and Gamma Knife, thus reducing patient mobility according to Covid-19 restrictions.

PO-1059 LINAC-based radiosurgery for brain metastasis: patterns of recurrence and predictors of response

PO-1059 LINAC-based radiosurgery for brain metastasis: patterns of recurrence and predictors of response

An automated optimization strategy to design collimator geometry for small field radiation therapy systems

Purpose. To develop an automated optimization strategy to facilitate collimator design for small-field radiotherapy systems. Methods and Materials. We developed an objective function that links the dose profile characteristics (FWHM, penumbra, and central dose rate) and the treatment head geometric parameters (collimator thickness/radii, source-to-distal-collimator distance (SDC)) for small-field radiotherapy systems. We performed optimization using a downhill simplex algorithm. We applied this optimization strategy to a linac-based radiosurgery system to determine the optimal geometry of four pencil-beam collimators to produce 5, 10, 15, and 20 mm diameter photon beams (from a 6.7 MeV, 2.1 mm FWHM electron beam). Two different optimizations were performed to prioritize minimum penumbra or maximum central dose rate for each beam size. We compared the optimized geometric parameters and dose distributions to an existing clinical system (CyberKnife). Results. When minimum penumbra was prioritized, using the same collimator thickness and SDC (40 cm) as a CyberKnife system, the optimized collimator upstream and downstream radii agreed with the CyberKnife system within 3%–14%, the optimized output factors agreed within 0%–8%, and the optimized transverse and percentage depth dose profiles matched those of the CyberKnife with the penumbras agreeing within 2%. However, when maximum dose rate was prioritized, allowing both the collimator thickness and SDC to change, the central dose rate for larger collimator sizes (10, 15, 20 mm) could be increased by about 1.5–2 times at the cost of 1.5–2 times larger penumbras. No further improvement in central dose rate for the 5 mm beam size could be achieved. Conclusions. We developed an automated optimization strategy to design the collimator geometry for small-field radiation therapy systems. Using this strategy, the penumbra-prioritized dose distribution and geometric parameters agree well with the CyberKnife system as an example, suggesting that this system was designed to prioritize sharp penumbra. This represents proof-of-principle that an automated optimization strategy may apply to more complex collimator designs with multiple optimization parameters.

Dosimetric study between a single isocenter dynamic conformal arc therapy technique and Gamma Knife radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases treatment: impact of target volume geometrical characteristics

PurposeTo compare linac-based mono-isocentric radiosurgery with Brainlab Elements Multiple Brain Mets (MBM) SRS and the Gamma Knife using a specific statistical method and to analyze the dosimetric impact of the target volume geometric characteristics. A dose fall-off analysis allowed to evaluate the Gradient Index relevancy for the dose spillage characterization.Material and methodsTreatments were planned on twenty patients with three to nine brain metastases with MBM 2.0 and GammaPlan 11.0. Ninety-five metastases ranging from 0.02 to 9.61 cc were included. Paddick Index (PI), Gradient Index (GI), dose fall-off, volume of healthy brain receiving more than 12 Gy (V12Gy) and DVH were used for the plan comparison according to target volume, major axis diameter and Sphericity Index (SI). The multivariate regression approach allowed to analyze the impact of each geometric characteristic keeping all the others unchanged. A parallel study was led to evaluate the impact of the isodose line (IDL) prescription on the MBM plan quality.ResultsFor mono-isocentric linac-based radiosurgery, the IDL around 70–75% was the best compromise found. For both techniques, the GI and the dose fall-off decreased with the target volume. In comparison, PI was slightly improved with MBM for targets < 1 cc or SI > 0.78. GI was improved with GP for targets < 2.5 cc. The V12Gy was higher with MBM for lesions > 0.4 cc or SI < 0.84 and exceeded 10 cc for targets > 5 cc against 6.5 cc with GP. The presence of OAR close to the PTV had no impact on the dose fall off values. The dose fall-off was higher for volumes < 3.8 cc with GP which had the sharpest dose fall-off in the infero-superior direction up to 30%/mm. The mean beam-on time was 94 min with GP against 13 min with MBM.ConclusionsThe dose fall-off and the V12Gy were more relevant indicators than the GI for the low dose spillage assessment. Both evaluated techniques have comparable plan qualities with a slightly improved selectivity with MBM for smaller lesions but with a healthy tissues sparing slightly favorable to GP at the expense of a considerably longer irradiation time. However, a higher healthy tissue exposure must be considered for large volumes in MBM plans.

RETRACTED: 68. FRAMELESS, VAULT-FREE RADIOSURGERY: INITIAL CLINICAL EXPERIENCE WITH THE ZAP-X STEREOTACTIC SYSTEM

The Zap-X is a novel self-contained and self-shielded dedicated radiosurgery system developed and manufactured by ZAP Surgical Systems, Inc. of San Carlos, California. Intended for the stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatment of benign and malignant intracranial and cervical spine lesions, this gyroscopically stabilized 3 megavolt (MV) linear accelerator (LINAC) provides a unique radiosurgical alternative for selected patients. Beginning in January 2019, a total of 38 metastatic lesions in 24 patients were treated in our facility. Radiation prescription doses ranged from 1500–1900 cGy (single fraction) to 2500 cGy (five fractions), with treatment volumes ranging from .04 to 15.3 cc. Daily treatment times averaged 45 minutes or less. Target coverage, dose homogeneity, and conformality were comparable to the existing Gamma Knife, CyberKnife and LINAC-based radiosurgery treatment systems in daily use at our facility. As with other frameless radiosurgery platforms, the Zap-X proved particularly useful in situations where either surgery or single-fraction radiosurgery was considered a less desirable treatment option; or when fractionated radiosurgery was thought to be radiobiologically advantageous. All treatments were completed without complication. At two months post-treatment, all lesions showed a complete or partial response to therapy based on MRI scan. None of our patients experienced treatment-related skin reaction, cognitive deficit, fatigue or steroid dependency. Among patients who had previously undergone Gamma Knife treatment, there was a clear preference for frameless radiosurgery. In our experience, the Zap-X delivery system offers a high-precision, patient-friendly and cost-effective alternative to traditional dedicated radiosurgical platforms.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations: Evaluation of Obliteration and Review of Associated Predictors

BackgroundHigh arteriovenous malformation (AVM) obliteration rates have been reported with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and multiple factors have been found to be associated with AVM obliteration. These predictors have been inconsistent throughout studies. We aimed to analyze our experience with linear accelerator (LINAC)-based SRS for brain AVMs, evaluate outcomes, assess factors associated with AVM obliteration and review the various reported predictors of AVM obliteration. MethodsElectronic medical records were retrospectively reviewed to identify consecutive patients with brain AVMs treated with SRS over a 27-year period with at least 2 years of follow-up. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with AVM obliteration. ResultsOne hundred twenty-eight patients with 142 brain AVMs treated with SRS were included. Mean age was 34.4 years. Fifty-two percent of AVMs were associated with a hemorrhage before SRS, and 14.8% were previously embolized. Mean clinical and angiographic follow-up times were 67.8 months and 58.6 months, respectively. The median Spetzler-Martin grade was 3. Mean maximal AVM diameter was 2.8 cm and mean AVM target volume was 7.4 cm3 with a median radiation dose of 16 Gy. Complete AVM obliteration was achieved in 80.3%. Radiation-related signs and symptoms were encountered in 32.4%, only 4.9% of which consisted of a permanent deficit. Post-SRS AVM-related hemorrhage occurred in 6.3% of cases. In multivariate analysis, factors associated with AVM obliteration included younger patient age (P = .019), male gender (P = .008), smaller AVM diameter (P = .04), smaller AVM target volume (P = .009), smaller isodose surface volume (P = .005), a higher delivered radiation dose (P = .013), and having only one major draining vein (P = .04). ConclusionsAVM obliteration with LINAC-based radiosurgery was safe and effective and achieved complete AVM obliteration in about 80% of cases. The most prominent predictors of AVM success included AVM size, AVM volume, radiation dose, number of draining veins and patient age.

Pediatric Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformation: Long-Term Outcomes with Linear Accelerator (LINAC)-Based Radiosurgery

PurposeTo analyze and report the long-term outcomes of intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVM) treated with linear accelerator (LINAC)-based radiosurgery (LBRS) in the pediatric population. Methods and MaterialsA series of 34 pediatric patients (≤18 years old) who were treated between 2002 and 2016 were analyzed. All patients were treated with LBRS in a single fraction, with a median dose of 16.8 Gy to the 80% isodose line. Median age at treatment was 14.4 years (range 5.5-18.9). Median AVM volume was 2.91 mL (range 0.228-27.313). Median modified radiosurgery-based AVM score was 0.83 (range 0.18-2.96). The most common presenting symptom was intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) (n = 22, 64.7%). Nine patients underwent intervention before LBRS, which included prior embolization or resection. Seven lesions were in eloquent locations, defined as basal ganglia, thalamus, or brainstem. Cerebral angiography was done to confirm obliteration. ResultsMedian follow-up time was 98 months (range 36-200 months). Twenty-two of the 34 lesions were obliterated (64.7%) with median time to obliteration of 37 months (range 14-79). No deaths occurred during the follow up period; however, two patients experienced ICH after treatment. Three other patients were treated for symptomatic radiation necrosis. ConclusionsTreatment of intracranial AVM with LBRS in the pediatric population is demonstrated to be safe and effective with long-term follow up.

Linear accelerator-based radiosurgery is associated with lower incidence of radionecrosis compared with gamma knife for treatment of multiple brain metastases

BackgroundGamma knife (GK) and linear accelerator (LINAC)-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) both offer excellent local control in the management of multiple brain metastases. The efficacy and toxicity of LINAC and GK SRS have not been directly compared in the modern era. We studied outcomes in patients treated with LINAC SRS and GK at two separate institutions. MethodsWe identified patients treated with either LINAC or GK who were treated to ≥2 lesions and had available follow up. LINAC patients were treated using single-isocenter multitarget technique. We used Cox regression, Fine and Gray competing risks regression, and nearest neighbor propensity score matching to account for confounders and imbalance between cohorts. Kaplan–Meier curves were used to estimate overall survival and rates of radionecrosis. ResultsWe identified 391 patients who were treated in 537 courses to a total 2699 lesions (LINAC: 1014, GK: 1685). After propensity score matching, GK was associated with similar overall survival (HR = 0.86; 95% CI 0.59–1.24; p = 0.41) and higher rate of radionecrosis (HR = 3.83; 95% CI 1.66–8.84; p = 0.002) compared to LINAC. In a secondary propensity score matched analysis comparing radionecrosis in single-fraction LINAC and GK, GK remained associated with higher incidence of radionecrosis (HR = 4.42; 95% CI 1.28–15.29; p = 0.019). ConclusionsIn this multi-institutional study, we found similar overall survival with lower incidence of radionecrosis in patients treated with LINAC compared to GK SRS. These findings are hypothesis generating and should be validated in an independent cohort.

An Empirical Model for Describing the Small Field Penumbra in Radiation Therapy.

Purpose We developed a mathematic empirical model for describing the small field penumbra in order to analyze the potential dose perturbation caused by overlapping field to avoid the dose calculation errors in linear accelerator-based radiosurgery. Materials and methods A ball phantom was fabricated for measuring penumbra at 4 different gantry angles in the coplanar plane. A least square root estimation (LSRE) Model was created to fit the measured penumbra dose profile and to predict the penumbra dose profile at any gantry angles. The Sum of Squared Errors (SSE) was used for finding the parameters n and t for the best fitting of the LSRE model. Geometric and mathematical methods were used to derive the model parameters. Results The results showed that the larger the gantry angle of the field, the more the expansion of the penumbra dose profile. The least square root estimation model for describing small field penumbra is as follows: where PenumbraD(š) denotes the dose profile D(š) at the penumbra region, T is the penumbra height (usually in scalar 100), n is the parameter for curvature, š = x − W d/2 (x and š are the values in cm on x-axis), and t is the radiation transmission of the collimator. Geometric analysis establishes the correlation between the penetration depth of the exposure and its effect on the penumbra region in ball phantom. The penumbra caused by an exposure at any arbitrary angles can be geometrically derived by using a one-variable quadratic equation. Conclusion The dose distribution in penumbra region of small field can be created by the LSRE model and the potential overdosage or underdosage owing to overlapping field perturbation can be estimated.

Twelve-year results of LINAC-based radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas.

To report long-term outcomes of 53patients with vestibular schwannomas (VS) submitted to asingle high-dose LINAC-based radiosurgery (SRS) in our institution. 48 (92%) patients were evaluable for clinical and MRI response as well as late toxicity. At amedian follow-up of 12years (range 2-16years), local control (LC), hearing capacity, trigeminal and facial nerve function, and toxicity were assessed. Hearing capacity was classified according to the Gardner-Robertson scale, where classI-II patients had "serviceable hearing." Median dose of SRS was 16.5 Gy (range 13-20Gy) and median tumor volume 1.7 cm3 (range 0.09-7.4 cm3). 35 (73%) patients were treated with SRS alone, in the remaining 13 (27%) patients, SRS was performed as salvage therapy for recurrent or progressive tumors after previous microsurgery. Before SRS, 44patients (92%) had hearing loss and 25 (52%) had "non-serviceable" hearing. Tumor extension, classified with Koos categories, was gradeI-II in 27 (56%) and gradeIII-IV in 21 (44%) cases. LC was 100% and hearing preservation in "serviceable hearing" patients was 91%. 4 (11%) patients developed incomplete and intermittent ipsilateral facial nerve palsy which regressed in amedian time of 6months. Trigeminal toxicity was registered in 11 (23%) patients, reversible in 6 (13%) and permanent in 5 (10%). Only Koos tumor gradeIII-IV significantly influenced late toxicity (p = 0.01). LC and hearing preservation after SRS were excellent. Toxicity proved acceptable. Although the median administered dose (16.5 Gy) was rather high, the only factor which significantly influenced late toxicity was Koos tumor gradeIII-IV.

Dosimetric performance of two linear accelerator-based radiosurgery systems to treat single and multiplebrain metastases.

To evaluate and compare the dosimetric plan quality for noncoplanar volumetric arc therapy of single and multiple brain metastases using the linear accelerator-based radiosurgery system HyperArc and a robotic radiosurgery system. 31 tumors from 24 patients were treated by stereotactic radiosurgery using the CyberKnife system. CT images, structure sets, and dose files were transferred to the Eclipse treatment planning system for the HyperArc system. Dosimetric parameters for both plans were compared. The beam-on time was calculated from the total monitor unit and dose rate. For normal brain tissue, the received volume doses were significantly lower for HyperArc than for CyberKnife_G4 and strongly correlated with the planning target volume (PTV) for cases of single brain metastasis. In addition, the difference in volume dose between CyberKnife_G4 and HyperArc was proportional to the PTV. For multiple brain metastases, no significant difference was observed between the two stereotactic radiosurgery systems, except for high-dose region in the normal tissue. In low dose for brain minus PTV, when the maximum distance among each target was above 8.0 cm, HyperArc delivered higher dose than CyberKnife_G4. The mean ± SDs for the beam-on time were 15.8 ± 5.3 and 5.6 ± 0.8 min for CyberKnife_G4 and HyperArc, respectively (p < .01). HyperArc is best suited for larger targets in single brain metastasis and for smaller intertumor tumor distances in multiple brain metastases. The performance of HyperArc in comparison with CyberKnife_G4 was depended on defined margin and tumor distances.

Linac-Based Radiosurgery for Patients With Brain Oligometastases From a Breast Primary, in the Trastuzumab Era-Impact of Tumor Phenotype and Prescribed SRS Dose.

Background: The role of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the treatment of limited numbers of brain metastases in selected breast cancer patients is well-established.Aims: To analyse outcome from a single institutional experience with SRS, to identify any significant prognostic factors and to assess the influence of Her-2, estrogen receptor status, and prescribed dose on outcome.Methods: The medical records of 56 patients treated at in a single institution between 2009 and 2014 were reviewed. Demographic, treatment related and outcome data were analyzed to identify prognostic factors in this patient population. The primary endpoints were overall survival and local control. Secondary endpoint was distant intra-cranial progression-free survival.Results: The median follow- up time for the entire cohort was 10.33 months (1.25–97.28). The overall median survival was 12.5months (95%CI = 5.8–19.2), with 53.3%, and 35.8% surviving at 1- and 2- years post-SRS. After adjustment for the effect of Her 2 status, uncontrolled extra-cranial disease at the time of SRS predicted for shorter survival (HR for death = 3.1, 95% CI = 1.4–6.9, p = 0.006). At the time of death, 75% of the patients had active, uncontrolled intra-cranial disease, with 56% these patients presenting intra-cranial disease only. Sustained local control was observed in 56 (59.6%) of 94 treated metastases. In univariate analysis, Her2 status, ERHer2 group status?, and prescribed SRS dose were highly significant for local progression free-survival (LPFS). After adjustment for the effect of Her 2 status, patients receiving 12–16 Gy can expect shorter LPFS than those receiving 18–20 Gy (HR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.0–2.8, p = 0.043). After adjustment for the effect of dose group, patients with Her 2 negative cancer can expect shorter LPFS than those with Her 2 positive cancer (HR = 2.6, 95% CI = 1.5–4.4, p < 0.0005). Use of prior WBRT did not impact survival, local or distant intra-cranial progression-free survival.Conclusions: Survival outcome is similar to the published literature. Improved outcomes are observed in patients with Her 2-positive, controlled extracranial disease at the time of SRS and higher SRS dose delivered. Achieving intra-cranial control appears to be an important factor for the survival of the breast cancer patients in the era of targeted therapies.